Video & Transcript : 'feedback mechanisms' :
Page 198 of 500
NH
Transcript Highlights:
- [Music] If it's okay, I think I've got good feedback on this issue.
- If it's okay, I think I've got good feedback on this issue.
- I think I I've got I've<01:15:46.880><c> received</c><01:15:47.120><c> good</c><01:15:47.320><c> feedback
- on on this I've received good feedback on on this issue<01:15:49.360><c> number</c><01:15:49.639><c>
- </c> speculate on that right the mechanism speculate on that right the mechanism should<02:50:20.560>
OR
Oregon 2026 Regular Session
Financial Estimate Committee - Drafting Meeting Jul 6th, 2026
Transcript Highlights:
- One, we should certainly gather more of that feedback directly.
- our Great conversation we've had is take this as our next draft and maybe let the staff take our feedback
- Okay, that's the kind of feedback I was looking for. Thank you. I appreciate that.
- I'm guessing you all may need to think about the feedback you've received, plus those other pieces that
Summary:
The Financial Estimate Committee met on July 6, 2026, to begin work on the financial estimate for IP 28, after reviewing the statutory process and confirming that only IP 28 had cleared the signature threshold for consideration. Staff explained the committee’s duties under ORS 250.125 and the timeline for draft statements, public hearing, and final adoption. The committee also designated Carol Moreno C. Fuentes to file the committee’s eventual statements.
Staff from the Department of Administrative Services and the Legislative Revenue Office presented preliminary analysis of IP 28, describing major uncertainties in estimating impacts because the measure is not a tax law change and would affect multiple industries and government functions. Preliminary figures discussed included an estimated $56.5 million loss in the current biennium and $6.7 million in reduced expenditures, with larger projected revenue losses of roughly $244.1 million to $258 million and reduced expenditures of $30.7 million to $34.9 million in 2027–29, plus $87.8 million to $88.3 million in increased expenditures. Analysts said the biggest effects would likely involve agriculture, fish and wildlife, hunting and fishing, local government enforcement, and possible shifts in state funding, but many impacts remained difficult to quantify.
Committee members raised concerns about local government costs, law enforcement and prosecution burdens, impacts on the hospitality and recreation sectors, possible effects on tribal governments and treaty rights, and whether the measure would affect shellfish and crabbing. They also discussed the Humane Transition Fund, subsidies, possible litigation costs, and whether the statement should include broader uncertainty language and multiple scenarios. Members generally agreed the draft should be revised to better reflect uncertainty, clarify assumptions, and possibly use bullets or other formatting to improve readability.
No vote was taken. The committee agreed to treat the current draft as a working version, with staff to revise it based on the discussion and return an updated draft before the next meeting scheduled for July 17 at 2 p.m., with both in-person and virtual participation available.
MN
Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session
Office of Inspector General 3/24/26
Minnesota House Floor Meeting
Transcript Highlights:
- I appreciate the feedback, and we can continue to take a hard look at that and make sure we've got the
- I appreciate the feedback, and we can continue to take a hard look at that and make sure we've got the
- Um I appreciate the feedback and line.
- Um I appreciate the feedback and we<00:06:17.560><c> can</c><00:06:17.720><c> continue</c><00:06:18.240
MN
Transcript Highlights:
- WORK OF THE OF THE EXISTING ROMAN FRAUD WORKING GROUP AND INVITED THEM TO PROVIDE IT TO PROVIDE FEEDBACK
- They're quick to give us feedback in that space. Thank you.
- They're quick to give us feedback in that space. Thank you.
- THE THEY'RE QUICK TO GIVE GIVE US FEEDBACK IN THAT SPACE. THAT THANK YOU, Mr.
MS
Mississippi 2026 Regular Session
Municipalities - Room 216, 30 January, 2026; 9:30 AM
Municipalities
Transcript Highlights:
- planners association, some economic development folks, um, the counties, the realators to get their feedback
- 04:01.680><c> their</c> counties, the realators to get their counties, the realators to get their feedback
- 03.360><c> think</c><00:04:03.519><c> based</c><00:04:03.840><c> on</c><00:04:04.000><c> what</c> feedback
- And I think based on what feedback.
ND
North Dakota 2026 1st Special Session
Legislative Procedure and Arrangements Jan 8th, 2026 at 10:00 am
Transcript Highlights:
- So their feedback will also be included in the overall analysis.
- this goes out, it is verified that the state is engaging with the public, and we want to hear the feedback
- passing the same or a similar piece of legislation over years, refining it based on each session's feedback
- And I want to be very careful when I'm saying that, but that is some of the feedback that I received
Summary:
The Legislative Procedure and Arrangements Committee met with a quorum, approved the previous meeting minutes, and heard an update from Garty Consulting on the interim study of legislative term limits. The consultants outlined their research plan and preliminary themes, including loss of institutional knowledge, shifts in power toward executive agencies and lobbyists, reduced long-term policy capacity, faster leadership turnover, and recruitment/support challenges. They also described possible recommendation categories ranging from constitutional and statutory changes to procedural and cultural adjustments. Committee members asked about how other states repealed term limits, how the public survey would address perceptions of term limits, and how stakeholder focus groups would be selected. The committee also heard a presentation from NCSL on term limits in other states, including examples from Nevada, Montana, and Colorado, with discussion of training programs, staffing changes, annual-session debates, bill limits, and impacts on decorum and leadership continuity. Several members requested follow-up data on part-time versus full-time legislatures, taxpayer costs, and nonpartisan staff devoted to oversight.
The committee then considered revisions to the legislature’s workplace harassment policy and related forms. Legislative Council explained changes that clarified the definition of harassment, added captions for readability, extended several deadlines, allowed informal resolution before a review panel is appointed, clarified the role of Legislative Council in intake and documentation, and updated confidentiality/open-records language. Members, especially Senator Hogan, said the revisions better formalize the role of counsel and provide a less intimidating path for resolving complaints. The committee adopted the revised policy and forms by roll call vote.
Finally, the committee approved a motion to enter executive session at 1:00 p.m. to review the results of a capital threat assessment and discuss legislator security, citing the applicable open-meetings exemptions. Members were instructed to limit discussion to the stated purpose and not take final action until returning to open session.
CA
California 2025-2026 Regular Session
Assembly Water, Parks, and Wildlife Committee Jul 15th, 2025
Transcript Highlights:
- What's DWR's sort of feedback for you? Yeah, I have not heard from DWR.
- Thank you for the feedback. Thank you for the feedback. Thank you for the feedback.
Summary:
The committee heard and advanced several natural resources and water-related bills. SB 224 by Senator Hurtado would require the Department of Water Resources to implement audit recommendations, improve climate-informed water supply forecasting, and provide annual updates to the Legislature; supporters emphasized the need for better transparency and more accurate water planning, and the bill passed as amended to Appropriations. SB 556, also by Senator Hurtado, would fund floodplain restoration in the Tulare Basin to reduce flooding, recharge groundwater, and provide habitat and other community benefits; local officials and conservation groups supported it, some initial concerns about Proposition 4 were resolved, and the bill passed as amended. SB 630 by Senator Allen would streamline State Parks and other state real property acquisitions by raising review thresholds and reducing duplicative approvals; conservation groups and park advocates supported the measure, while some members raised oversight and fiscal concerns, and it passed as amended. SB 718 by Senator Allen would reduce hunting and fishing license costs for low-income Californians, framed as helping subsistence users and disabled veterans and seniors, and it passed as amended.
The committee also approved SB 427 by Senator Blakespear, which extends the sunset of the Habitat Conservation Fund from 2030 to 2035. Supporters said the fund has protected more than 1.2 million acres, leverages other funding, and supports habitat, recreation, and climate resilience; members highlighted its importance for areas like the Salton Sea and the need to protect the funding stream from future sweeps. SB 586 by Senator Jones, an e-moto off-highway vehicle bill, was taken up with little discussion and passed as amended. SB 639 by Senator Ashby would extend the deadline for Sacramento-area flood protection projects in the Natomas Basin and Beach Lake subareas from 2025 to 2030 to allow completion of remaining work and avoid delays to infill housing; city, county, and flood agency representatives supported it, and it passed as amended.
Throughout the hearing, witnesses and members repeatedly emphasized water reliability, flood protection, conservation funding, and reducing bureaucratic delays. Several bills drew broad support from local governments, water agencies, tribes, and conservation organizations, and multiple members requested to be added as coauthors. All of the measures discussed were reported out of committee, generally with amendments and with some items left open for add-on votes.
NH
New Hampshire 2025 Regular Session
JLCAR Administrative Rules (06/20/2025)
Transcript Highlights:
- So trying to balance it there and happy to consider further feedback.
- 07:17.840><c> to</c><00:07:18.000><c> consider</c><00:07:18.880><c> further</c><00:07:19.360><c> feedback
- </c><00:07:20.479><c> And</c> happy to consider further feedback.
- And happy to consider further feedback.
Summary:
The JLCAR June meeting opened with the pledge, approval of the prior minutes, and adoption of the consent calendar after one Fish and Game item was pulled for separate consideration. The committee then reordered the regular calendar and postponed an HHS item at the agency’s request because work was still ongoing.
The committee next considered OPLC item 2547, concerning amendments to licensure and discipline forms for regulated professions. Members raised concerns that the application was still too geared toward health professions and that renewal forms should be shorter, but the agency said it was moving toward a dynamic online form that would collapse irrelevant questions. The committee concluded the issue was more about agency operations than policy and adopted the rule.
For DNCR item 2551, on rules for the Adopt-a-Park volunteer program, staff explained the agency had been operating the program under statute but had realized rules were required and had been using DOJ review in the meantime. Committee members noted the agency had not followed the rulemaking requirement but was now correcting it, and the rule was approved. Fish and Game item 2570, on electronic OHRV and snowmobile registration applications, drew discussion over whether the online process should be processed in five days to match mail-in applications or remain at ten days; the agency cited workload and file-transfer delays, and the committee adopted a conditional approval with an oral amendment leaving the ten-day timeframe in place for now.
In other business, staff described a planned upgrade to the committee’s agency portal and database workflow, moving from email submissions to an online portal with better form validation and document upload features. Members supported the modernization and approved the manual change, with implementation expected after agency sign-up and training later in the summer.
MN
Transcript Highlights:
- So there's this ongoing communication feedback loop.
- We do get initial feedback from districts to be able to pay out the funds immediately after the summer
- Inadvertently, in our discussions with our colleagues in DCYF, as well as some feedback we received during
- We're in constant communication with the governor's office, relaying information, communication, or feedback
MN
Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session
Human services committee considers bill to create Department of Direct Care and Treatment 3/25/25
Transcript Highlights:
- what this amendment does: it establishes the CEO underneath the commissioner, and all the other feedback
- c><00:01:34.640><c> all</c><00:01:34.880><c> the</c><00:01:35.119><c> other</c><00:01:35.360><c> feedback
- </c><00:01:35.680><c> that</c> uh and all the other feedback that uh and all the other feedback that
Summary:
The committee took up House File 2037, which would replace the current executive board model for Direct Care and Treatment with a commissioner-led structure. Representative Frederick moved the DE1 amendment, which was adopted, to conform the bill with Senate language and place the CEO under the commissioner. Frederick said the change was intended to preserve some continuity while increasing accountability and insulating direct health care services from politics.
Frederick argued that the existing executive board, which meets only a few times a year and hires the CEO, would leave the legislature and governor with limited ability to respond quickly to serious problems in a billion-dollar agency. He said the bill is about accountability to Minnesota taxpayers and creating a structure more like other state agencies. Public testimony was closed without any outside witnesses.
Members discussed the tradeoffs between board governance and a commissioner model. Chair Schumacher noted Frederick would become chief author of the bill, and several members said they appreciated the effort to balance accountability, continuity of care, and operational expertise. Questions focused on the role of the advisory council; Frederick said it would remain in place so stakeholders could advise the commissioner and CEO, and that legislators are included among its members. The committee then laid over House File 2037, as amended, for possible inclusion in a later bill.
MN
Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session
Committee on Judiciary and Public Safety - Part 2 - 03/19/26
Judiciary and Public Safety
Transcript Highlights:
- Um, it has some enforcement mechanisms.
- I'd like to see a formal mechanism for them to say, "Hey, here's the deal.
- The third is providing a mechanism with the Clean Slate law.
- The third is providing a mechanism with the Clean Slate law.
- The third is providing a mechanism with the Clean Slate law.
WY
Wyoming 2026 Regular Session
Senate Floor Session-Day 13, February 24, 2026-PM
Wyoming Senate Floor Meeting
Transcript Highlights:
- To find a mechanism to prevent some of that in the future.
- And they were hoping to<01:01:59.520><c> find</c><01:01:59.839><c> a</c><01:02:00.079><c> mechanism</
- to prevent some of to find a mechanism to prevent some of that<01:02:02.319><c> in</c><01:02:02.480>
- Something to think about. have some built-in escape mechanism.
- And have some built-in escape mechanism.
MN
Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session
House Commerce Finance and Policy Committee 2/19/26
Commerce Finance and Policy
Transcript Highlights:
- But thank you to each of the members and the stakeholders that have reached out to offer your feedback
- But thank you to each of the members and the stakeholders that have reached out to offer your feedback
- 59:14.880><c> there's</c><00:59:15.119><c> there's</c><00:59:15.520><c> two</c><00:59:15.839><c> mechanisms
- </c><00:59:16.400><c> of</c> bill, there's there's two mechanisms of bill, there's there's two mechanisms
ID
Transcript Highlights:
- This rule docket was fully negotiated and we received no negative feedback or concerns from our stakeholders
- This was fully negotiated, and we received no negative feedback or concerns from stakeholders.
Summary:
The House Health and Welfare Committee met with a quorum, approved the February 9, 2026 minutes, and heard an RS from Representative Josh Wheeler and Representative Healy, RS 33336. The proposal would create a pilot program giving primary care, psychiatry, and OB-GYN physicians who serve as preceptors a one-year exemption from prior authorization requirements, with the goal of reducing administrative burden and increasing medical preceptorships. Wheeler said the department believed it could absorb the work with existing staff, and the pilot would be capped at 100 physicians per specialty. The committee voted to introduce the RS.
The committee then considered two rules dockets from the Commission on Aging. Director Judy Taylor said docket 15-01-01-2501 would streamline and simplify rules governing senior centers and Older Americans Act programs, update definitions, and align references with program guidance and federal regulations; the docket had been fully negotiated and drew no stakeholder opposition. The committee voted to adopt it. Taylor also presented docket 15-01-20-2501, which would repeal the rules governing area agency on aging operations because they were duplicative of federal law and contract terms; this docket was also fully negotiated and had no negative feedback. The committee voted to adopt that docket as well.
The meeting concluded with the chair noting there were no further agenda items and that the committee would meet again the next day.
ID
Idaho 2026 Regular Session
Agenda Jan 15th, 2026
Transcript Highlights:
- I've had really good feedback about your work already and I think you're going to work out real well
- I've had really good feedback about your work already, and I think you're going to work out real well
Summary:
The Senate Commerce Committee met with a quorum and held a brief organizational session. The main items were introductions of two new pages: Amanda Olson of Rathdrum, a Lakeland High School student involved in student council, FCLA, and National Honor Society who said she is interested in government and politics; and Cooper Smith of Nampa, who enjoys weight training, recently moved from Europe, and plans to study global management and international business in France. Committee members welcomed both students and asked Cooper a few questions about his time in Spain and plans to study in Toulouse or Paris.
Vice Chairman Lenny then discussed the committee rules, noting that the rules packet had to be distributed on paper because of a website/system glitch affecting the electronic version. He explained that the rules would not be assigned out individually and asked all committee members to review them. No substantive legislation was heard, and no votes were taken.
The chair then asked for any further committee or public comments. None were offered, and the meeting adjourned.
MN
Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session
Committee on Health and Human Services - 03/26/25
Health and Human Services
Transcript Highlights:
- We've had 37 associations reach out to us to engage on providing feedback, and we're scheduling those
- But all of that feedback was provided on all of your listening sessions from day one, which the agency
- That's something you can discuss with your team as well and provide feedback to the members that have
- </c> able to provide um significant feedback able to provide um significant feedback on<00:58:36.559>
- Cunningham: Members, I would appreciate it if you have any feedback or input on this type of approach
CA
California 2025-2026 Regular Session
Senate Budget and Fiscal Review Subcommittee No. 3 on Health and Human Services May 7th, 2026
Transcript Highlights:
- So we're happy that we were able to incorporate a lot of the feedback we received.
- So are you saying this is the first time you've ever heard this feedback?
- So are you saying this is the first time you've ever heard this feedback?
- This is the first time you've ever heard this feedback?
- We've received that feedback.
MN
Transcript Highlights:
- They haven't used the city's newsletter to ask for feedback.
- Since that day, they have yet to hold the town hall feedback or uh feedback on these projects.
- They haven't used the city's newsletter to ask for feedback.
- Since that day, they have yet to hold the town hall feedback or uh feedback on these projects.
- Since that day, they have yet to hold the town hall feedback or uh feedback on these projects.
MN
Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session
House Fraud Prevention and State Agency Oversight Policy Committee 2/23/26
Fraud Prevention and State Agency Oversight Policy
Transcript Highlights:
- We welcome DHS audits and legislators' evaluation of our programs so that we can receive feedback and
- Very much appreciate the feedback from the agency. Appreciate the concern from Lead Pinto.
- Very much appreciate the feedback from the agency. Appreciate the concern from Lead Pinto.
- </c><01:26:29.480><c> Appreciate</c><01:26:30.080><c> the</c> feedback from the agency.
- Appreciate the feedback from the agency.
Bills:
HF3542
MN
Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session
House Workforce, Labor, and Economic Development Finance and Policy Committee 1/16/25
Workforce, Labor, and Economic Development Finance and Policy
Transcript Highlights:
- Thank you for the opportunity to give our feedback on this important matter.
- I just wanted to see if you have heard any additional feedback in that regard on this topic.
- I just wanted to see if you have heard any additional feedback in that regard on this topic.
- I just wanted to see if you have heard any additional feedback in that regard on this topic.
- I just wanted to see if you have heard any additional feedback in that regard on this topic.