Transcript Highlights:

• So, you know, a certain amount of common sense should be used. A certain amount of common sense.
• Madam Chair, Representative, I want to thank you for, you obviously have put an incredible amount of
• That doesn't mean that it can't be done safely, given the right amount to do so. Thank you.
• How long would it take, sort of the shortest amount of time, to get a hearing?
• So it's a good amount of energy to produce, to treat the produced water. Correct, Madam Chair.

Keywords: 996, all

Transcript Highlights:

• What this bill does, it gives the trustee the authority to distribute the taxes that would be paid by
• Uh, allow them to distribute that so they could pay their taxes because sometimes people may get hit
• What this bill does, it gives the trustee the authority to distribute the taxes that would be paid by
• trust is required to be distributed trust is required to be distributed currently.<00:07:37.120>
• <00:09:15.600> uh may not have gotten a distribution uh may not have gotten a distribution

Bills: HB259, HB206, HB207, HB259, HB206, HB207

Keywords: income tax credit, tax incentive, recruitment, remote work, remote worker, recruited worker, rural counties, small counties, county population tiers, opportunity zone, teacher recruitment, nurse recruitment, law enforcement recruitment, workforce development, economic development, relocation incentive, Alabama Department of Revenue, nonrefundable tax credit, tax carryforward, state income tax

Transcript Highlights:

• So really focusing on the distribution rather than the individual…” The distribution rather than the
• This is the best practices to regulate and oversee the production and distribution.
• This is the best practices to regulate and oversee the production and distribution.
• , or possession with intent to distribute, rather than possession for personal use only, Chair Domb.
• , or possession with intent to distribute, rather than possession for personal use only, Chair Domb.

Keywords: 995, all

Summary: The special commission on xylazine met virtually to review and discuss the first draft of its final report. Chair Mindy Domb opened the meeting, confirmed quorum, and the commission approved the minutes from its December 11 public meeting. Staff then walked commissioners through the proposed report structure, including background on xylazine as both an FDA-approved veterinary drug and an illicit drug supply contaminant, as well as appendices for public meeting materials and public resources. The commission discussed findings and recommendations for several working groups. For oversight and enforcement, members focused on licit versus illicit sources of xylazine, noting that the illicit supply is typically obtained through online vendors rather than diverted from veterinary use. Recommendations included better storage and reporting practices in authorized settings, review of manufacturing and distribution information, and focusing enforcement on fentanyl trafficking and large-scale xylazine importation rather than personal possession. Commissioners also discussed whether xylazine should remain in Schedule 6 or be subject to additional penalties, and several members emphasized the need for coordination, information-sharing, and possibly a DPH task force or advisory body to monitor emerging drug threats. For outreach and treatment, staff summarized strong existing programs such as drug checking, wound care education, naloxone distribution, mobile and low-threshold care, and self-directed wound kits, while noting gaps including the lack of an FDA-approved reversal agent for xylazine, difficulty distinguishing xylazine from other exposures, and uneven access by geography, insurance, and audience. Commissioners stressed the need for provider education, including physicians, nurses, pharmacists, family support networks, and first responders, and for clear guidance on wound care and when more intensive treatment is needed. The education and training section identified first responders, clinicians, non-clinicians, and people who use drugs and their families as key audiences for tailored, stigma-free materials, with emphasis on real-time, centralized data, naloxone and breathing support, recognition of overdose versus xylazine exposure, and adapting materials as the drug supply changes. The meeting ended with discussion of next steps: staff will circulate a revised draft by March 2, the commission will meet again on March 9 to consider the report and recommendations, and an additional late-March meeting was reserved if needed before the statutory deadline.

Transcript Highlights:

• Foundation funding refers to the amount distributed to school districts for that school year from the
• So in 2025, that amount is $7,357...
• salary amount.
• So this is the amount for 500 students. We, as the Bureau, don't set that amount.
• The committee set that amount. So that's up to all of you to set that amount.

Keywords: 1204, all

Summary: The joint education committee continued its adequacy study with a Bureau of Legislative Research presentation on resource allocation, covering how Arkansas school spending is mapped to the adequacy matrix and how expenditures are split between foundation funds and other funding sources. Staff explained the methodology, district and school categories used for comparisons, and key findings for matrix spending, including that classroom teachers account for the largest share of matrix expenditures and that districts spend more per student than charter districts in most categories. Members asked for additional breakdowns on waivers, trend data, and more detailed spending by district type, and staff agreed to provide follow-up information. The committee then reviewed non-matrix spending, including instructional aides, facilities, school safety, mental health services, dyslexia support, gifted and talented, career and technical education, and other items not explicitly in the matrix. Staff noted that non-matrix spending exceeded $2 billion and that superintendents consistently identified mental health services, school safety, and dyslexia support as important needs not fully captured in the matrix. Members raised concerns about dyslexia identification and funding, school safety, facilities spending, and whether some items such as food service should be included in adequacy calculations. Staff and Department of Education representatives explained that some expenditures are difficult to isolate because of coding and commingled funds, and that certain items are funded outside the matrix or through separate programs. In the final section, staff summarized total spending across matrix and non-matrix items, noting that districts spent more than the foundation amount per student and that most total spending was on matrix resources. They also highlighted data limitations, including two matrix lines that cannot be fully tracked through current accounting codes. The chair then proposed postponing the second part of the presentation until a May meeting after the fiscal session, with additional time set aside to address questions for both staff and the Department of Education. The committee agreed, and the meeting adjourned without any formal vote on policy changes.

Transcript Highlights:

• But the executive budget did highlight a certain amount for school aid.
• >> Senator yields. >> This extender, in addition to that $5.9 billion in additional school aid distribution
• >> >> THROUGH YOU, MADAM PRESIDENT, >> Senator yields. >> Senator, what is the total amount
• >> SENATOR, WHAT IS THE TOTAL AMOUNT OF THIS BUDGET THAT IS BEING CONSIDERED?
• want to say thank you to... ...everyone for supporting our community, and I represent an enormous amount

Keywords: 993, senate, all

Summary: The Senate opened with routine proceedings, approved the prior day’s journal, and then took up a budget extender. Senator Serrano’s appropriation bill was recalled from the Assembly, reconsidered, amended, and sent through Rules to the floor. During debate, senators discussed the ongoing delay in finalizing the state budget, the 13th extender, school aid payments, the Yonkers school district payment, and unresolved issues such as Tier 6 retirement changes and other budget policy items. The extender was passed 57-2 after debate, with senators pressing for more transparency about the budget negotiations and the majority responding that those issues were not germane to the extender. The chamber then recognized several resolutions and guests. Senators spoke in support of Resolution 1948 honoring New York State 4-H and its Capital Days participants, Resolution 2054 commemorating Italian American Day, and Resolution 1620 mourning Denis Michael Troy of Rockland County. The Italian American Day resolution drew extensive remarks from many senators about family histories, immigration, cultural contributions, scholarships, and community traditions, and the Senate welcomed honored guests from the Italian American community. The Rosalyn Yalow Charter School fencing team was also introduced, along with the family of Denis Troy. The Senate then moved through a long calendar of bills, passing measures on public service, city administrative code, municipal law, correction law, criminal procedure, real property tax, education, social services, public health, executive law, parks, judiciary, and alcoholic beverage control, among others. Several members explained votes on bills related to ratepayer protection, hip-hop lyrics in criminal cases, sovereign nations and gaming compacts, and the Traveling with Dignity Act requiring adult changing stations in public facilities. Most bills passed with broad support, though some drew notable negative votes. The Senate completed the calendar and adjourned until Tuesday, May 19, at 3:00 p.m.

Transcript Highlights:

• 1997 fire that we had up in the San Cristóbal area, the Hondo fire, our communities have taken the amount
• There's not a reason why these could be reallocated, not changing the base amount.
• That's been A good amount of time to start catching up on these water initiatives.
• I just, if some of these are much longer programs, this is an extremely modest amount, and I would love
• And then finally, paradoxically or surprisingly, it would actually increase the amount of revenue towards

Keywords: 996, all

Transcript Highlights:

• YOU CAN SEE THE SLIDES AT 22 OR 23 BILLION IN 21 AND 22 AND 23 BILLION AND NOW A HUGE JUMP IN THE AMOUNT
• AND IN OUR GOVERNORS BUDGET WE ARE ADDING SIX MORE BECAUSE I CAN DOUBLE THE AMOUNT OF WORK THAT THERE
• FOR A FLORIDA STATE VETERANS HOME, 200 PLUS RESIDENTS HAVE BEEN PROVIDED DENTAL CARE IN THE AMOUNT OF
• YOU WILL SEE SHORTLY ON THE SLIDE THE AMOUNT OF DOLLARS WE DEDICATE TOWARD THAT.
• THAT $2 MILLION WE HAVE BEEN GETTING THE AMOUNT FROM THE STATE PRETTY REGULARLY.

Keywords: 999, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• So now that gets to be distributed to the different special funds.
• <01:30:43.400> to so now that gets to be distributed to so now that gets to be distributed
• be the appropriate amount that aligns with the administration package.
• <02:02:41.679> for<02:02:42.599> uh<02:02:42.719> an amount for uh an amount for
• language suggestion that um the amount language suggestion that um the amount of<02:09:49.239>

Keywords: 910, house, all

Summary: The joint hearing covered HB 553 on biomarker testing coverage, HB 556 on colorectal cancer screening access, and later HB 712 on 340B drug pricing. For HB 553, the American Cancer Society Cancer Action Network, patient advocates Natalie Heyman and Susan Hirano, a surgical oncologist, and the American Lung Association strongly supported the bill, arguing that biomarker testing should be covered when ordered by a doctor and guided by current evidence. DHS and several insurers offered comments and requested amendments, with DHS saying it appreciated the intent but wanted changes. The committees then voted to pass HB 553 with amendments, including a House draft and a defective date of July 1, 3000; both the House Health and Human Services and Homelessness committees adopted the recommendation unanimously. For HB 556, testimony focused on closing gaps in colorectal cancer screening, especially for uninsured and underinsured patients who can get stool-based screening but then cannot access follow-up colonoscopies. Community Clinic of Maui, ACS CAN, and the American Cancer Society supported the bill, with ACS CAN urging a program similar to the breast and cervical cancer control program and offering amendments. DHS requested that the program and appropriation not conflict with executive budget priorities, and the committees noted technical amendments, a defective date, a blank appropriation amount, and corrections changing Medicare references to Medicaid. HB 556 was also passed with amendments by both committees. The hearing then moved to HB 712 on 340B drug pricing and contract pharmacies. The Department of Health and the Attorney General’s office expressed concern that the bill would require the state to regulate private commercial activity and said the department lacked the expertise and resources to implement it as written, suggesting it might belong in a different statutory section. In contrast, PhRMA opposed the bill, while Hawaii Pacific Health and Hawaii Island Community Health Center supported it, saying 340B savings are important for hospital services and patient access to low-cost medications, especially where manufacturers have restricted shipments to contract pharmacies. No vote on HB 712 was taken in the portion provided.

Transcript Highlights:

• Foundation funding refers to the amount distributed to school districts for that school year from the
• multiplied in order to get a salary amount, but... ...to get a salary amount.
• Is that based on a certain amount of students?
• We don't set that amount; the committee set that amount.
• provided according to the matrix amount.

Summary: The House/Joint Education committee continued its adequacy study with a Bureau of Legislative Research presentation on resource allocation, focusing first on matrix spending and then non-matrix spending. Staff explained the methodology for mapping APSCN expenditure data to matrix lines, reviewed district and school categories used in the analysis, and highlighted key findings: foundation funding covered a large share of matrix costs but total spending on matrix items exceeded foundation funding, with classroom teachers making up the largest share. Members asked for additional breakdowns on waivers, superintendent survey responses, trend data, and spending by district type, size, and rural/urban status. Staff also noted limitations in tracking two matrix lines—salary enhancement for other employees and all personnel health insurance—because of coding and definition issues. The committee then reviewed non-matrix expenditures, including instructional aides, facilities, school safety, mental health, dyslexia services, gifted and talented, and career and technical education. Staff reported that non-matrix spending remained above $2 billion over the last three years, with most of it coming from other funds rather than foundation funding. Members raised concerns about dyslexia identification and funding, mental health needs, school safety, food service, athletic transportation, and whether some items should be added to the matrix. The Department of Education clarified that the building fund reflects district-held funds for construction and maintenance projects, while the facilities partnership program is a separate state process for approved projects. In the final discussion, staff summarized total spending as more than $15,800 per student in 2025, with about 69% going to matrix resources and 31% to non-matrix resources. The chair explained the adequacy process and the committee’s role in setting future funding recommendations, and members discussed the recommendations worksheet included in the binder. The chair then proposed postponing the remainder of Part Two of the presentation until a May meeting after the fiscal session, along with inviting the Department of Education back for more detailed questions; with no objections, the committee adjourned.

Transcript Highlights:

• programs, things that you have done as a legislature such as raise pay for teachers, increase the amount
• But we put a tremendous amount of importance on math and on reading and on graduation.
• The collection and the amount of the collection is out of our hands. So, Mr. Chair, I apologize.
• And so there is still an amount in the general fund which is theoretically in statute.
• And we're talking about increasing bonding amounts and we just increased them in 2018.

Transcript Highlights:

• The proposed amendment would increase the threshold amount for review from $50,000 to $2 million.
• not designated in the legislation, and so the board had to come up with that amount.
• We matched the same amount that we used for dialysis...
• And so the board had to come up with that amount.
• But that amount has to be approved by rule before it can be implemented.

Summary: The committee first approved a motion, then heard a lengthy presentation on homelessness policy and behavioral health. Testimony focused on the view that Arkansas should shift toward more data-driven, outcomes-based responses to homelessness, including stronger treatment options for serious mental illness and substance use disorder, better data collection, provider accountability, and possible statewide use of the Certified Community Behavioral Health Clinic (CCBHC) model. Speakers from Fort Smith, Restore Hope, Our House, and Western Arkansas Counseling described local work, the need for better coordination across providers, and the role of crisis services, ACT teams, and employment support. Members asked about sex offender tracking, the difference between sheltered and unsheltered homelessness, how to scale successful programs statewide, and whether Arkansas could apply for a statewide Continuum of Care or CCBHC planning grant. The discussion also touched on camping bans, civil commitment, and federal funding changes, with several speakers urging the state to pursue the CCBHC planning grant and more transparent reporting systems. After the homelessness discussion, the committee moved through a series of Department of Energy and Board of Nursing rule reviews. DEQ proposed updating the post-closure cleanup threshold for solid waste matters from $50,000 to $2 million to match Act 791 of 2025, and members asked about financial assurance and oversight; the rule was reviewed without objection. The Board of Nursing then presented multiple rule changes tied to recent acts, including adding fees for dialysis patient care technician registration, expanding contact-information requirements, implementing APRN delegation authority to unlicensed workers, clarifying APRN authority for death certificates and durable medical equipment prescriptions, updating certified medication assistant training and insulin-injection authority, and conforming independent-practice rules for clinical nurse specialists. Each rule was reviewed without objection. Near the end of the meeting, Senator Irvin announced that UAMS had completed its NCI designation submission for the Winthrop Rockefeller Cancer Institute, calling it an important milestone for the state. The committee then adjourned.

Transcript Highlights:

• for children should be no different than buying ibuprofen and children's Tylenol, and the dosage amounts
• I'm assuming the FDA and the company that distributes it. You're recognized for a follow-up.
• I've worked with the insurance committee to try to Get the language right and get the dollar amount to
• And looking at what the amount that we're wanting to put in these products at 0.4 milligram per pound
• We're on this earth for a finite amount of time.

Bills: HB3552, HB2984, HB4124, HB3934, HB3448, HB3131, HB4200, HB4201, HB3011, HB1912, HB3380, HB3881, HB3538, HB3851, HB3907, HB4430, HB4431, HB4457

Keywords: childcare, differential pricing, Department of Human Services, child care subsidy, licensed providers, emergency legislation, child care, subsidy program, annual report, program integrity, overpayments, ivermectin, over-the-counter medication, pharmacy immunity, healthcare access, FDA approval, prescription, public health, dentistry, licensing

Transcript Highlights:

• Permits HOAs to require a driveway gate to be set back an appropriate amount, prohibits the installation
• halls or meetings with constituents, and in order to do that, at times, we require a significant amount
• Current law sets a fixed maximum amount of unemployment benefits payable during a benefit year.
• House Bill 199 introduces a sliding scale for the maximum amount of unemployment benefits House Bill
• 199 introduces a sliding scale for the maximum amount of unemployment benefits payable during a benefit

Bills: HB112, HB199, HCR9

Keywords: school district, bond issuance, election dates, voter approval, Texas Education Code, HCR 9, Texas State Cemetery, Hill Country flood, July 4 2025 flood, Guadalupe River, Camp Mystic, memorial, monument, concurrent resolution, disaster remembrance, natural disaster, flood victims, survivors, State Preservation Board, Texas secretary of state

Summary: The Committee on Trade, Workforce and Economic Development met with a quorum and moved quickly through a long agenda, hearing testimony and taking recorded votes on several bills. Early in the meeting, HB 2214 was laid out to exempt certain short-term residential leases and leaseback arrangements from flood-disclosure requirements; Texas Realtors supported the change, and the bill was left pending. The committee then voted out a series of pending measures, including HB 46, HB 186 (with a committee substitute), HB 431, HB 1147, HB 1154, HB 2468, HB 2488, HB 2788 (with a substitute), HB 2791 (with a substitute), HB 3260, and HCR 90, all reported favorably to the full House, with HB 1147 receiving two nays and the others passing unanimously or nearly so. A major portion of the hearing focused on HB 112, which would create a Texas Science Park district and commission to support advanced manufacturing and innovation sites. The bill’s author and supporters, including Samsung Austin Semiconductor, the Texas Association of Business, and the Governor’s economic development office, argued it would strengthen supply chains, attract investment, and support national security and workforce development. Testimony described interest from semiconductor and advanced manufacturing companies and referenced the model of foreign science parks such as Sinshu in Taiwan. HB 112 was left pending after testimony. The committee also heard HB 3698 and HB 3699, both related to unemployment insurance administration. HB 3698 would expand eligibility for the Reemployment Services and Eligibility Assessment program using federal funds, while HB 3699 would tighten the definition of “last work” to help the Texas Workforce Commission investigate UI fraud. Both bills were discussed with TWC resource witnesses and left pending after the committee withdrew the substitutes. HB 1349, which would extend HOA transparency and property-rights provisions to condominiums and refine HOA rules, and HB 621, which would require HOA meeting spaces to be available for residents to reserve for qualified political candidates or elected officials, were also heard and left pending. Finally, the committee heard HCR 9 to designate the first Saturday of each month as Small Business Saturday, HB 199 to index unemployment benefit duration to the state unemployment rate, and HB 3466 to exempt certain cancelable service contracts from Texas’s in-home sales cooling-off law; each drew supportive and opposing testimony and was left pending before adjournment.

Transcript Highlights:

• And those contracts have a dollar amount written into it.
• <01:51:15.280> written contracts have a dollar amount written contracts have a dollar amount
• Ali, um, Muriel from Health Care Distribution.
• <04:23:30.560> that surplus in excess of any amounts that surplus in excess of any amounts
• Sorry if I didn't distribute the packets correctly.

Keywords: 928, house, all

Summary: The committee first heard Senate Bill 47, sponsored by Senator Regina Birdsell at the request of the Insurance Department. The bill would clarify that a birth mother’s health insurance is the primary policy for a newborn’s care unless the mother has no coverage or no employer-sponsored coverage. Birdsell and Insurance Commissioner DJ Benton Court said the measure simply codifies the department’s long-standing interpretation of existing law. Representative Miles asked whether the coverage would extend to a grandchild if a young woman on her parents’ plan had a baby, and Birdsell said it would. The hearing on SB 47 was then closed. The committee next heard Senate Bill 121, introduced by Grant Bosi for Senator Kevin Avard. The bill requires insurers to notify the Insurance Department when they stop writing an entire line of business or, in some cases, when they change Medicare Advantage offerings. Benton Court said the bill was prompted by disruption in the Medicare Advantage market, where consumers and the department were confused by carriers exiting, changing plans, or narrowing offerings. He said the department does not regulate Medicare Advantage itself, but does license the carriers, and the notice requirement would help the department advise consumers; he also said noncompliance could affect a carrier’s license and could lead to fines. Members discussed the notice period, and the department and AHIP indicated support for changing it from 120 days to 90 days to align with federal timing. The hearing was closed with plans to work on an amendment in subcommittee. Finally, the committee heard Senate Bill 247, introduced by Representative Brian Cole, which would prohibit network exclusion for pharmacies that refuse to dispense prescriptions when PBM reimbursement is below acquisition cost. Cole said the bill is meant to stop pharmacies from being forced to sell at a loss. Members questioned whether pharmacies voluntarily enter PBM contracts, whether the bill would raise consumer prices, and whether it would mainly affect independent pharmacies. Cole and others said the issue has changed over time because PBMs now control a much larger share of the market, and that the bill would let pharmacies refuse loss-making fills and direct patients to mail order instead. The discussion also noted that the bill excludes Medicare and Medicaid and that the current proposal does not create a middle-ground option for patients to pay a premium at the counter.

Transcript Highlights:

• I did not support it, but the author has put in just an unbelievable amount of work, including leading
• I repeat, it reduces the amount of single-family homes for people to buy.
• It is a large amount, and when I even talk to my constituents, they do not want 1,000.
• The cost shift has amounted to an estimated $8.5 billion last year alone and is expected to increase
• "Can you just dive over, can you just kind of explain how that is going to be distributed?"

Summary: The Assembly met after a quorum call and first dealt with a procedural dispute over four amendments to AB 1240. The Speaker ruled the amendments out of order as not germane, and the Assembly sustained that ruling on a 49-16 vote. Members then added co-authors to several consent-calendar resolutions, including measures on the National Conference of State Legislators, Suicide Prevention Awareness Month, ALS Awareness Month, and Men’s Mental Health Month, before adopting the consent calendar. The chamber also heard guest introductions, including a welcome for Oakland Mayor Barbara Lee, and took up a motion to bring AB 41 up out of file, which failed 19-48. The bulk of the meeting was floor action on a long series of bills and resolutions, many of which passed with broad bipartisan support. Measures approved included ACR 40 supporting immigrant students and FAFSA privacy; AB 917 on permanent status for certain school employees; AB 985 on anesthesia access; AB 7 and AB 42 on higher education and student services; AB 245 providing property tax relief for wildfire victims; AB 255 allowing funding for drug-free recovery housing; AB 279 updating K-12 library standards; AB 289 creating a pilot for automated speed enforcement in highway construction zones; AB 291 on an educator apprentice program; AB 327 addressing swatting; AB 340 on confidential union communications; AB 341 creating an oral health technical assistance center for people with disabilities; AB 356 on San Diego health care infrastructure; AB 410 on bot disclosure; AB 476 on copper theft enforcement; AB 477 on educator pay targets; AB 485 on stolen wages and business licensing; AB 487, the insurance committee’s technical omnibus bill; AB 573 on tobacco retail license fees; AB 598 on school mapping technology; AB 635 on mobile home law enforcement referrals; AB 651 on remote participation for incarcerated parents in dependency hearings; AB 654 on homelessness hotline assistance in Los Angeles County; AB 662 creating a South County higher education task force; AB 667 on language access in professional licensing; AB 669 limiting early denial of addiction treatment; AB 670 on naturally occurring affordable housing; AB 695 on online continuation of community college for deported students; AB 723 on disclosure for digitally altered real estate images; AB 727 placing Trevor Project information on student IDs; and AB 736, a $10 billion affordable housing bond for the June 2026 ballot, which passed on a 61-11 urgency vote after extensive debate. Debate on AB 736 was the most extensive of the day, with supporters arguing the bond would help address California’s housing crisis and give voters a chance to weigh in, while opponents criticized the state’s bond debt and past spending results. The Assembly then recessed for caucus meetings and later returned to continue the daily file, where additional measures were taken up, including AB 798 adding diapers and wipes to the emergency food bank reserve program, which passed 56-0, and AB 821 on career technical education, which was presented as bipartisan-supported as the transcript continued.

Transcript Highlights:

• Now the amount of money so in current law it allows the the amount of money is calculated, the maximum
• amount of money that can be kept is 5% of the amount raised by property tax.
• <03:36:35.680> that a um it's it's a budgeted amount that a um it's it's a budgeted amount
• of money is calc the maximum amount of money is calc the maximum amount<03:41:04.399> of<03:41
• amount to verbiage that doesn't amount amount to verbiage that doesn't amount to<04:51:56.878>

Keywords: 1189, house, all

Transcript Highlights:

• We are requesting a grant and aid for our capital work in the amount of $694,444 for the renovation of
• Now we're expanding our feeding the hungry distribution center to meet the growing demand.
• That's the estimated amount of the positive economic impact of this program on the local economy last
• amount of the positive<05:11:12.760> economic<05:11:13.400> impact<05:11:14.240> of
• Last April, we distributed over 10 million pounds of food through the school and senior pantries, yet

Keywords: 910, house, all

Transcript Highlights:

• This would or various dollar amounts.
• <01:08:43.040> of It simply um uh increases the amount of It simply um uh increases the amount
• everybody fighting for such small amount everybody fighting for such small amount amounts<01:29:
• Senator Seberger, so amounts of money.
• As you know, this was being distributed.

Keywords: 1187, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• on family size but just an amount.
• was chosen as an amount was chosen as an amount not<00:20:19.679> based<00:20:20.000>
• amount amount And<00:20:23.200> the<00:20:23.520> idea<00:20:23.760> that<00:20
• specified amount uh to a beneficiary. specified amount uh to a beneficiary.
• What it would do for me is expand the market for my self-distribution.

Keywords: 1191, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• you know obviously that that can amount you know obviously that that can kind<01:44:18.040> of
• as we as we kind Distributing as we as we kind of<02:09:32.559> create<02:09:32.880> and
• It's probably going to, like, quadruple the amount of inspectors that are needed to do this.
• We're noting the appropriation amounts in the committee report. Members, questions or concerns?
• We're noting the appropriation amounts in the committee report. Members, questions or concerns?

Keywords: 910, house, all