Transcript Highlights:

• The scope statement was approved in December. The team's in the planning phase.
• The scope statement was approved in December. The team's in the planning phase.
• The scope statement was approved in December. The team's in the planning phase.

Keywords: 928, house, all

Summary: The committee organized itself by electing Representative Griffin as chair and a senator as vice chair, then approved the prior meeting minutes. Director Young then gave status updates on several ongoing performance audits. The New Hampshire Commission for Human Rights audit was reported complete, with presentations already made to the fiscal committee and House Judiciary. The special education oversight audit is still in progress, with 17 observations already sent to the department, responses received on 14, partial concurrence on 12, and a full draft report expected in late summer or early fall. The education freedom accounts audit is also underway, with fieldwork focused on eligibility controls and expenses; staffing shortages at the department have slowed the work, and a draft report is hoped for in the fall. The Doorway program audit is in the planning phase, with a report targeted for the end of the year. Members then discussed whether the committee should do more follow-up on completed audits. Several members said audits often identify issues that remain unresolved for years, and suggested a more active review process, similar to the Health and Human Services Oversight Committee, where agencies would return to report on what audit findings have been fixed and what remains outstanding. Staff noted that any such follow-up would take time away from new audit work, but said they were willing to consider the committee’s direction. Members also discussed using Transparency New Hampshire updates and agency self-reporting to help track progress, and there was general agreement to move toward a system of periodic follow-up on recent audits. The committee also reviewed suspended and potential audit topics. Two Department of Health and Human Services audits, involving the Bureau of Elderly and Adult Services and out-of-date placements, remain suspended because of ongoing litigation. Two other DHS topics, contract management and the Bureau of Developmental Services, remain on the potential audit list. A member raised a possible Fish and Game topic based on constituent concerns, but agreed to wait after speaking with the new director. The committee concluded by agreeing that the audit division should compile a list of audits completed in the last 10 years, with members to identify which ones they want to revisit first.

Transcript Highlights:

• Is that a correct statement? That is a correct statement.
• You made the statement that we require y'all to have this liability.

Bills: SB397, SB481, SB596, SB760, SB855, SB1195, SB1196, SB1233, SB1257, SB1318, SB1368, SB1388, SB1398, SB1524, SB1558, SB1589, SB1677, SB1792, SB2034

Keywords: SB 397, telemedicine, telehealth, teledentistry, remote care, virtual care, consent documentation, patient consent, data collection, data sharing, audio-only telehealth, in-person examination, irreversible medical procedure, health professional regulation, Occupations Code, Texas Health and Human Services, medical records, provider compliance, data privacy, consumer rights

Transcript Highlights:

• That's my introductory statement on this proposal. Great, we'll hear from the CARB representative.
• So that's just my statement, and I'm ready to pass the torch. Thank you.
• As we assess the reality of the auctions coming in and look at updated fund condition statements for

Keywords: 988, house, all

Transcript Highlights:

• I'm definitely familiar with the sentiment that's out there in some of the recent statements.
• Yes, I'm familiar with some of the recent statements.
• I'd be happy to review the statements a little bit more closely.

Keywords: 1184, house, all

Transcript Highlights:

• Chip, do you recognize for a statement there?
• And Representative Alvarez, oh, sorry, I just want to add one more statement to make it clear for Representative
• Representative Hart, to your statement earlier about what are we doing about insurance companies, we

Summary: The subcommittee held its first meeting on homeowners property insurance, with members from both parties introducing themselves and repeatedly noting that insurance affordability, roof condition, claims handling, and storm recovery are top concerns for their districts. Chair Yeager said the meeting was intended as an educational discussion rather than a legislative debate, and introduced a panel that included Insurance Commissioner Mike Yaworski, consumer Chad Carr, agent Mary Catherine Lawler, insurer executive Melissa Burt DeVries, and policyholder attorney Chip Merlin. The panel and members discussed major cost drivers in Florida homeowners insurance, including inflation, home age, roof age, mitigation features, claims history, litigation costs, reinsurance, and the Florida Hurricane Catastrophe Fund. Commissioner Yaworski said underwriting has become more sophisticated and that litigation costs, reinsurance, and replacement-cost inflation all affect premiums; he also said litigation is down about 30% and average requested rate increases have fallen from about 22.1% in 2022 to 0.8% today. DeVries said age of home, replacement cost, roof age, and coverage choices can materially change premiums, and explained that reinsurance is a major expense passed through to consumers. Merlin emphasized transparency concerns, argued that insurers are increasingly individualizing risk, and said consumers often struggle with coverage limits, deductibles, and claim denials. Members asked about flood coverage, hurricane deductibles, managed repair programs, mitigation credits, new insurer capitalization, and whether savings from reforms are reaching consumers. Yaworski explained that flood is generally excluded from homeowners policies and covered separately, that hurricane deductibles are mandatory in Florida and usually around 5%, and that the office tracks savings from reforms through rate filings and insurer discussions. He said the state is updating mitigation discounts and monitoring new entrants closely for solvency and market conduct. Several members and panelists said recent reforms have helped reduce some abuses and litigation, but many consumers are still seeing higher premiums because replacement costs and reinsurance remain elevated. No votes or formal actions were taken.

Transcript Highlights:

• If the candidate has filed the financial disclosure statement required for public officers for that year

Keywords: 1182, all

Summary: The committee heard testimony on Senate Bill 1133, an emergency measure intended to streamline financial disclosure filings for certain candidates and officeholders. The bill would deem a candidate in compliance with nomination-paper disclosure requirements if they have already filed the annual financial disclosure statement required of public officers, eliminating the need for a duplicate filing for that year. Members discussed that the change would apply only for the relevant filing year, not for an entire term, and several members said the current process is repetitive and unnecessary. During discussion, staff clarified that the bill would not change the normal candidate filing requirements for all situations, but would reduce duplicative filings for officeholders who are also candidates. Members expressed support for simplifying the process. The vice chair moved Senate Bill 1133 be returned with a do pass recommendation, and the committee approved the motion by a vote of 5-0, with two members absent.

Transcript Highlights:

• The surplus statement, as you all know, did assume $5 million in the budget for the sale in state fiscal
• The surplus statement, as you all know, did assume $5 million in the budget for the sale in state fiscal
• So it was after the January 1 deadline had passed that he made that statement. Very informative.
• that he made that statement. that he made that statement.
• in the ACF uh uh there was a statement in the ACF uh uh material<00:39:17.440> that<00:39:17.680

Keywords: 1189, house, all

Summary: House Finance Division 3 met in work session and opened with procedural remarks from the chair about the committee’s schedule, deadlines, and recommendation options, noting the meeting was advisory and no votes were expected. The first bill discussed, House Bill 1569, concerned repealing the directive to sell the Anna Philbrook Center for Children property in Concord. Testimony from DHHS and New Hampshire Hospital focused on whether the property could be subdivided, the relationship to Senate Bill 572, the status of the city of Concord’s first right of refusal, and the practical effects of a sale. Witnesses said the $5 million sale estimate was a budget assumption, that moving staff and equipment would create some relocation costs, and that the center had required significant recent maintenance and renovation spending. Members also discussed the number of transitional housing beds at the site, the temporary nature of those beds, and whether the property should remain available given hospital workforce and service needs. The committee then turned to House Bill 661, which had been recommitted for further review after new information emerged. The chair summarized federal developments, including a December 2025 ACF letter and a related executive order, as well as a federal HHS press release about states diverting foster youths’ Social Security survivor benefits. Representative Walner explained that amendment 3055H had been drafted to move the bill forward in smaller steps, with a fiscal note requested on the amendment because the original bill was viewed as too large and expensive. Members discussed whether the committee had received copies of the amendment and whether federal guidance or funding had changed the policy landscape. The discussion also included broader questions about foster youth benefits and whether federal action would support state implementation. One member cited ACF language stating that only 11 states had enacted policies to stop interception of survivor benefits and that technical assistance would be available to the remaining states. The meeting remained in work-session mode throughout, with no votes taken and no final recommendations made during the portion provided. The chair indicated the committee could return to the bills later in the month.

Transcript Highlights:

• So the provisions that you laid out in your statement, parental control, I think that applies to everyone
• So the provisions that you laid out in your statement, parental control, I think that applies to everyone
• So the provisions that you laid out in your statement, parental control, I think that applies to everyone
• like this where uh you know statement like this where they<01:39:24.480> can<01:39:24.800>
• Pediatrics put out a policy statement Pediatrics put out a policy statement called<01:46:55.520>

Keywords: 1189, house, all

Keywords: 1136, house, all

Transcript Highlights:

• or the physician's speculation of the patient's reproductive intentions contrary to the patient statement
• or the physician's speculation of the patient's reproductive intentions contrary to the patient statement
• It was specifically said in another statement that the facilities can add more information that was not
• that<02:39:50.120> um<02:39:50.560> the<02:39:50.720> facilities another statement
• that um the facilities another statement that um the facilities can<02:39:51.640> add<02:39:52.040

Keywords: 1189, house, all

Transcript Highlights:

• >> uh just a general statement on those two?
• Um, you don't that's just a statement.
• Thank you for those statements.
• Thank you for those statements. >> Follow. Thank you for those statements.
• Just I'll start with a brief statement.

Keywords: 916, all

Transcript Highlights:

• Let me make one quick statement to the committee members, and then we're going to adjourn.

Keywords: 959, house, all

Summary: The Special Committee on Tourism met in executive session after establishing a quorum and considered three measures. House Bill 2213, relating to Ulysses S. Grant Day, was moved do pass and approved unanimously. House Bill 3216, relating to Missouri River Runner Day, was also moved do pass and approved unanimously. Senate Bill 1613, relating to Frankie Muse Freeman Day, received the same treatment and was approved unanimously as well. Members noted that testimony had been heard on each bill in a prior meeting, and the chair described the committee’s work this year as bipartisan and focused on naming days, roads, bridges, and similar measures. Several members offered appreciative remarks about the committee’s collegiality and the chair’s leadership. No other business was taken up, and the committee adjourned.

Transcript Highlights:

• Before we begin, I wanted to make a quick statement about testimony.

Summary: The Assembly Committee on Military and Veterans Affairs met for a brief hearing and announced that all four bills on the agenda were on consent. The chair reviewed the bills: SB 54 by Senator Umberg on court fee waivers, SB 55 by Senator Umberg on state park passes for Gold Star family members, SB 67 by Senator Seyarto on student financial aid and Cal Grants, and SB 621 by Senator Grove on voter registration for military and overseas voters. No public testimony was taken, and the chair emphasized orderly proceedings and limits on disruptive conduct. A quorum was present, and the committee moved to approve the consent calendar. The secretary called the roll, and the committee voted to pass the bills. SB 54, SB 55, and SB 67 were approved with a do pass recommendation and re-referred to the Committee on Appropriations. SB 621 was also approved and sent to third reading. After the roll was held open briefly for an absent member, the remaining vote was recorded and all consent items were cleared. The hearing concluded immediately after the consent calendar was completed, with no opposition, amendments, or substantive debate recorded.

Transcript Highlights:

• And I don't make a statement as to whether another officer from the area would or would not have been
• That would be a correct statement, if you think?
• If you state your name, who you represent, and you may give your statement.
• If you state your name, who you represent, and you may give your statement.
• an exception to hearsay as long as there's been a hearing to determine the reliability of those statements

Keywords: 1185, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• The gentleman from McCracken stated in his opening statement that we now have the healthiest rainy day
• 34.960> opening from McCracken stated in his opening from McCracken stated in his opening statement
• 53:36.520> we<00:53:36.680> now<00:53:37.000> have<00:53:37.240> the statement
• that we now have the statement that we now have the healthiest<00:53:38.360> rainy<00:53:38.640
• And I will point back to the gentleman's statement earlier when we started this endeavor a year or better

Keywords: 958, all

Transcript Highlights:

• Chair, if it's all right with you, my colleague Rogers would like to make a brief statement. forward
• 27.320> it's Chair, if it's all right with you, my colleague Rogers would like to make a brief statement
• to<00:42:45.720> make<00:42:45.880> a<00:42:45.920> brief<00:42:46.120> statement
• <00:42:47.120> Rogers to make a brief statement. Um Mr.
• Rogers to make a brief statement. Um Mr.

Keywords: 1187, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• affects previously estimated funds available for budget operations as shown in the following summary statement
• in the budget operations as shown in the following<00:07:39.200> summary<00:07:39.600> statement
• <00:07:40.080> Sincerely, following summary statement.
• Sincerely, following summary statement.
• listening to the pastor's comments this morning, and during the invocation, she made a very profound statement

Keywords: Senate streaming session for Friday, March 6, 2026, 960, senate, all

Summary: The Senate opened with an invocation by Pastor Jermaine Turner, followed by welcoming remarks for visiting students and a quorum call confirming the chamber was in session. The body then moved through introductions and began considering bills and messages, including a supplemental budget message from the Governor that was journalized and referred to Budget and Taxation for incorporation into the FY27 budget. The chamber also handled several committee reports and amendments, with multiple measures ordered printed for third reading after no objections. Among the notable committee actions, the Senate adopted amendments and advanced Senate Bill 538 on Baltimore City raffles for organizations affiliated with professional baseball and football teams, Senate Bill 108 on water resources and wetlands enforcement, Senate Bill 328 on property tax credits for disabled or fallen public safety and judicial officers, Senate Bill 587 funding the Maryland Patient Safety Center Fund, Senate Bill 765 on property tax sales heir protection and tax credits, and Senate Bill 767 on property tax credits for commercial buildings rented to small businesses. The chamber also adopted favorable reports for Senate Bill 503 on the Growing Family Child Care Opportunities Program and Senate Bill 519 on delaying and studying the Earned Income Tax Credit Assistance Program. The Senate then took up third-reading votes on a series of bills, passing measures including Senate Bills 540, 544, 578, 581, 634, 638, 852, 897, 69, 177, 241, 323, 776, and 439. The final bill, Senate Bill 439 on employment discrimination related to fire and rescue public safety employees’ use of medical cannabis, prompted extended discussion about off-duty cannabis use, impairment, and the difference between prescribed opioids and medical cannabis recommendations. The bill sponsor and other senators debated whether cannabis can be prescribed, the role of physicians, and the lack of a measurable standard for impairment, but the transcript ends before a final vote on that bill is shown.

Transcript Highlights:

• It's just trying to make a statement. It has no weight or bearing.
• The city of Orlando in fiscal year 24-25 required all grant applications to submit DEI statements.
• Senator Yarborough: DEI statements.
• This bill very clearly just states that if you're a consumer, and as Senator Leake made that statement
• I was very concerned about the statements regarding Jasmine, the Jacksonville area sexual minority youth

Summary: The committee first considered CS/SB 1434 on infill redevelopment. A late-filed strike-all amendment narrowed eligibility to certain contaminated or brownfield properties in Miami-Dade, Broward, and Palm Beach counties, added adjacency and density/intensity limits, and excluded agricultural land, park land, land outside the urban growth boundary, and land near military installations. The amendment was adopted without opposition, and the bill was reported favorably on an 8-0 vote, with limited support and opposition noted in waived appearance forms. Members then took up CS/CS/SB 212 on sexual offenders and sexual predators. The strike-all added public swimming pools and related child-centered locations to residency and presence restrictions. Testimony was sharply divided: proponents argued the bill would help protect children and law enforcement, while opponents, including treatment experts and homelessness advocates, said there was no empirical evidence the restrictions reduce abuse and warned of retroactive punishment and increased homelessness. The amendment was adopted, and the bill passed 8-1. The committee also approved CS/CS/SB 686 on agricultural enclaves after an amendment allowing certain enclaves adjacent to interstates to be developed for commercial, industrial, or single-family residential uses and clarifying exclusions for protected areas. Opponents argued it would weaken zoning and comprehensive plans, while supporters framed it as a property-rights measure; the bill was reported favorably 10-0. SB 554 on nonprofit corporations, a technical update to nonprofit law modeled on prior for-profit corporate revisions, also passed unanimously after supportive waived testimony. Later, the committee approved SB 1338 on charitable giving, which creates a donor remedy for endowment restrictions and limits state reporting burdens on certain regulated or exempt organizations; members discussed cy pres and the sponsor said further changes would be worked out later. CS/SB 532 on court fees was amended to let clerks retain all collections above revenue projections rather than half, with supporters saying clerks have been underfunded for years; it passed 10-0. The committee also favorably reported SB 218 on land use regulations, which restores normal land-use authority to counties not affected by recent hurricanes, and CS/SB 692 on cybersecurity standards and liability, which creates a presumption against liability for entities that comply with cybersecurity frameworks and reporting requirements; the cybersecurity bill drew concerns about retroactivity and the adequacy of compliance incentives but passed 9-2.

Transcript Highlights:

• Because you're already—there's already a candidate statement that they're allowed to make. Correct.
• , which is SP 2457." already there's already a a candidate already there's already a a candidate statement
• statement that they're allowed to make. statement that they're allowed to make.
• That statement has stayed with me today.

Bills: SB2444, SB2446, SB2450, SB2453, SB2461, SB2457, SB2462, SB2313, SB2528, SB2532, SB2571, SB2678, SB2529

Keywords: real property, exemption, attachment, execution, consumer protection, financial security, inflation adjustment, head of family, senior citizens, Intermediate Court of Appeals, judges, Hawaii judiciary, court membership, legal system, presidential preference primary, elections, political parties, Hawaii voting, 2028 election, voting

Summary: The Judiciary Committee heard testimony on several bills. SB 2444 would raise the real property exemption amount for attachment or execution, which the Attorney General said could create vague retroactivity language and litigation risk; the committee noted the exemption had last been adjusted around 1978. SB 2446 would add a seventh associate judge to the Intermediate Court of Appeals. Judiciary staff testified in opposition, saying recent internal restructuring and a pending vacancy had improved output and that it would be prudent to wait and see the effect before adding another judge. The Public Defender supported the goal of faster appellate resolution but said it would defer to the court’s assessment and had no objection to revisiting the issue later. The committee also discussed current appellate timelines, with staff saying at least 225 days is built into the process before a case reaches a merit panel, and that a two-year delay from panel assignment was realistic under the current structure. The committee then heard SB 2450, which would establish a presidential preference primary for the 2028 cycle. The Chief Election Officer said the election would cost about $4 million, less if combined with the regular primary. Several opponents argued the bill would add bureaucracy, duplicate or undermine party-run processes, and waste taxpayer money; one speaker estimated the total cost could be closer to $6 million when county costs are included. Supporters and committee members discussed that the measure would not require parties to use the results and that Hawaii remains one of the few states still using caucuses. The committee also asked whether counties could staff the election and whether the results would be useful given Hawaii’s current primary timing. SB 2453 would require the Office of Elections to include a notice with each ballot that a digital and printed voter information guide is available, with the notice in 32-point font as a separate insert. The Chief Election Officer said the insert would cost about $90,000 and asked for an effective date of January 1, 2027 because mailing preparations for the primary would already be underway. The Disability and Communications Access Board, League of Women Voters, National Federation of the Blind of Hawaii, and others supported the bill. The committee also began hearing SB 2461, which would have the Office of Elections prepare a questionnaire for candidates and publish responses online and in the voter guide; the Chief Election Officer said the office did not think it should be the agency to shape campaign questions, though he said it could work if the questions were specified in statute. Finally, the committee heard SB 2457, which would require a criminal conviction before seized property could be forfeited. The Attorney General and Honolulu Police Department opposed the bill, arguing it would prolong cases, increase storage costs, and make forfeiture less effective against crime, especially where owners flee, die, or hide assets through shell companies. The Public Defender strongly supported the measure, saying forfeiture should be tied to convictions and that people challenging forfeiture often lack counsel. The Honolulu Prosecutor also opposed the bill, but said it supported transparency, due process, and even a right to counsel; it argued conviction-only forfeiture would fail in cases involving fugitives, deceased suspects, or hidden ownership structures. The committee questioned what would happen to property if an owner could not be found, and the prosecutor said the outcome would depend on the type of property and could involve abandonment or interpleader proceedings.

Transcript Highlights:

• The chair covered much of this in her opening statements.
• Relatively quickly, the chair covered much of this in her opening statements.
• And that wouldn't be an accurate statement, would it, that it's a constantly changing number.
• way—you've said it this way, but I'm going to add something on to it and tell me if this is an accurate statement—that
• Is that an accurate statement? For the most part, yes, in the simplified way, right?

Summary: The hearing was a select committee discussion on the transportation costs and impacts of California’s Low Carbon Fuel Standard (LCFS), with opening remarks from the co-chairs and members emphasizing affordability, climate goals, and the need to explain the program’s benefits to the public. The first panel from CARB and the California Energy Commission described how LCFS works as a market-based, declining carbon-intensity program that rewards lower-carbon fuels, supports zero-emission vehicle infrastructure, and is intended to reduce greenhouse gases and local air pollution. They argued the program has driven billions in private investment, increased alternative fuel use, and that LCFS credit prices are not the main driver of retail gasoline prices, which they said are dominated by crude oil, refining, and distribution costs. Members questioned the panel on the gap between the regulatory target and actual carbon-intensity performance, the role of credit banking, which fuels are generating the most credits, how the 2025 amendments affected the program, and whether LCFS credits are truly additional. CARB explained that banking helps cost-effectiveness and investment certainty, that ethanol, renewable diesel, and biodiesel currently provide the largest volumes while electricity is expected to grow, and that the updated targets were informed by the state’s 2045 carbon-neutrality goals and the 2030 scoping plan. The Energy Commission said its data show environmental programs add some cost to gasoline but do not drive price volatility, which is mainly tied to crude oil and refinery margins. The second panel, featuring academic and research experts, focused on program design, out-of-state credit generation, and broader economic effects. Speakers said LCFS is successful because it ties incentives to emissions benefit, uses life-cycle analysis, and allows flexible compliance that lowers costs compared with more direct regulation. They also said the program’s benefits generally outweigh costs, that it can reduce air pollution disparities and support equity, but that some issues—especially indirect land use change, additionality, and older program assumptions—need more research and may warrant future rulemaking. One researcher noted that while LCFS likely raises gasoline prices somewhat, the effect is uncertain by design and usually smaller than normal market fluctuations, and another warned that limiting credit generation too narrowly could create legal and efficiency problems.