Video & Transcript Research : 'testimonials'

Page 196 of 500
TX
Transcript Highlights:
  • Well, thank you both of you for your testimony. Okay, well thank you.
  • Thank both of you for your testimony. Thank you.
  • Thank you both of you for your testimony. Thank you.
  • Okay, we're going to start public testimony.
  • Okay, we're going to start public testimony.
Bills: SB 1
Summary: The committee heard budget presentations from the Legislative Budget Board and agency officials on several agencies, starting with the Texas Historical Commission. LBB described a large biennial reduction driven mainly by the removal of one-time funding and discussed capital projects, rider changes, and exceptional items including Presidio La Bahia and the National Museum of the Pacific War. Senators asked about heritage trails, courthouse grants, unexpended balance authority, and the status of historical-site funding. Historical Commission leadership emphasized preservation, courthouse restoration, heritage tourism, coordination with the Alamo and other Texas Revolution sites, and requested additional IT, staffing, and vehicle funding. No votes were taken. The committee then reviewed the Pension Review Board and the Employees Retirement System. The Pension Review Board’s budget was largely unchanged aside from IT maintenance and salary adjustments, with an exceptional item for additional IT enhancements. Members discussed the Dallas Police and Fire Pension System’s funding dispute and the need for a workable restoration plan. ERS presented a much larger budget, including funding for the retirement system, the group benefits plan, and the legacy payment intended to reduce unfunded liability. Senators focused heavily on pension investment returns, benchmark comparisons, and rising health-care costs, especially pharmacy spending driven by GLP-1 drugs; ERS said the plan covers about 540,000 lives and that premiums would rise 8% while benefits remain unchanged. ERS also said it had no exceptional items, and committee members requested more detailed benchmark information. The committee also heard from the Texas Emergency Services Retirement System and the Cancer Prevention and Research Institute of Texas. TESSORS reported an unfunded liability, an infinite amortization period, and requested additional state support, staffing, and IT funding, including a statutory change to allow a higher contribution level; the agency warned that without more funding it may have to cut benefits. CEPRIT’s presentation covered its bond-funded cancer research and prevention portfolio, revenue-sharing from funded projects, and a request to increase salary limits for its CEO and chief scientific officer. Senators questioned CEPRIT’s accomplishments and return on investment, while CEPRIT cited screening, prevention, and research outcomes, including tens of thousands of detected cancers and precursors and hundreds of thousands of first-time screenings. The meeting ended after these presentations and questions, with no recorded committee action or vote.
CA

California 2025-2026 Regular Session

Assembly Appropriations Committee Jul 16th, 2025

Transcript Highlights:
  • We encourage the public to provide written testimony before the hearing by visiting the committee website
  • Please note that any written testimony, Website at APRO.Assembly.ca.gov.
  • Please note that any written testimony submitted to the committee is considered public comment and may
  • Testimony on any such bill will be limited to a statement of name, organization, and position on the
  • The The committee will allow no more than 40 minutes of testimony in total.
Summary: The Assembly Appropriations Committee met on July 16, 2025, with a quorum present and 51 bills on the agenda. The chair reviewed public testimony rules, noted Assemblymember Arambula was absent, and took up the consent calendar. Several bills were approved on consent in two motions: one group eligible for the Assembly floor consent calendar and another group approved do pass with amendments. The suspense calendar was then deemed approved, covering a long list of Senate bills that were not individually heard. Two bills were presented before the committee. Senator Sívants presented SB 307, which would require CSU and UC to adopt protections for undocumented students affected by immigration enforcement, including preserving nonresident tuition exemption status, providing access to financial and academic support, and creating policies for grade withdrawals and re-enrollment. The California Faculty Association supported the bill, and an Assemblymember spoke in favor, citing the need to protect undocumented students; the bill was sent out on a roll call. Senator Allen presented SB 413, which would allow limited access to juvenile court records in certain civil and government claims cases to speed resolution and reduce costs, while maintaining privacy safeguards. The County of Los Angeles sponsored the bill, and it also moved out on a roll call, with Assemblymember Dixon not voting. After those presentations, the committee opened the floor for public comment on bills not heard that day, but no additional testimony was offered. The meeting then adjourned.
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Culture, Recreation & Tourism May 8th, 2025

Culture, Recreation & Tourism

Transcript Highlights:
  • witnesses who have registered and to accommodate all those who wish to testify, the chair may limit testimony
  • We'll proceed to testimony. We do not have anybody registered to testify.
  • As you'll hear from some of the testimony, it's something that is really quite a passion in our district
  • Seeing none, we're going to proceed to public testimony. Thank you for being here.
  • Tomlinson, for your testimony. Members, any questions for this witness?
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Insurance Apr 23rd, 2025

Insurance

Transcript Highlights:
  • We will be limiting testimony. Testimony will be limited to two minutes per witness.
  • I appreciate your testimony. Okay. Representative Morgan? Thank you.
  • So anyway, thank you for your testimony. Thank you for being here. Thank y'all very much.
  • Thank you for your testimony. Thank you, Mr. Chairman. The chair calls Craig Island. Welcome back.
MN

Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session

Committee on State and Local Government - Part 1 - 03/27/26

State and Local Government

Transcript Highlights:
  • begin with your testimony. begin with your testimony.
  • . testimony. testimony.
  • So I've also submitted written testimony So I've also submitted written testimony that<00:26:10.160
  • <00:28:27.440> Does uh for the testimony here. Okay. Does uh for the testimony here.
  • Members, any for the testimony.
Keywords: 1187, senate, all
MN

Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session

House Human Services Finance and Policy Committee 2/26/26

Human Services Finance and Policy

Transcript Highlights:
  • Uh, please move your bill and proceed with your testimony. Okay.
  • testimony from the online testifier.
  • We have two more testifiers testimony.
  • <00:26:20.640> and I appreciate everyone's testimony and I appreciate everyone's testimony
  • Uh, thank you so much for your testimony.
Bills: HF3423, HF2354, HF3634
MN

Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session

House Judiciary Finance and Civil Law Committee 2/24/26

Judiciary Finance and Civil Law

Transcript Highlights:
  • my testimony. my testimony.
  • Due to time, I will limit my testimony to three issues.
  • . testimony. testimony.
  • will limit my testimony to three issues. will limit my testimony to three issues.
  • Uh, are >> Thank you for your testimony.
KY
Transcript Highlights:
  • I know it took a lot of courage to give that testimony.
  • Um, as I said earlier, there testimony.
  • And as I heard you do your testimony today, it's very difficult to hear that.
  • So again, I just want to thank you for bringing your testimony here today.
  • <00:35:32.320> here you for bringing your testimony here you for bringing your testimony here
Keywords: 958, all
Summary: The committee met for its sixth and final interim meeting after a brief technical delay, approved the October 14 minutes, and heard a presentation on a proposed Kentucky hands-free driving bill. The main discussion centered on distracted driving and a draft measure modeled on South Carolina law that would prohibit holding or supporting a mobile electronic device while driving on public roads, while allowing limited exceptions for parked/stopped vehicles, navigation, emergency reporting, dispatch systems, first responders, and certain hands-free call functions. The bill would make a violation a $100 fine plus court costs, with the draft allocating fine revenue to the traumatic brain injury trust fund, Kentucky trauma care system, and veteran program trust fund. The sponsor also said the bill would address prior concerns about enforcement and clarify that officers need a clear, unobstructed visual observation before stopping a driver, and that they may not search or seize devices or make custodial arrests solely for the violation. Alyssa Burns gave emotional testimony in support of the bill, describing the death of her young daughter Kimberly in a crash she attributed to a distracted driver and urging lawmakers to pass the measure to improve roadway safety. The sponsor cited Kentucky traffic fatality statistics, including 814 deaths in 2023 and an estimated 20% involving distracted driving, and argued that the bill could reduce preventable deaths. Several members voiced support and sympathy, including remarks comparing the effort to past seat belt legislation and suggesting possible future additions such as community service. One member raised concerns about enforcement and whether officers could reliably observe phone use inside vehicles, while another asked about the bill’s interaction with existing texting-while-driving penalties and whether points would still apply. The sponsor said the draft was still being refined, acknowledged gray areas, and invited further changes as the bill moves forward.
MN

Minnesota 2025 1st Special Session

House Higher Education Finance and Policy Committee 4/1/25

Higher Education Finance and Policy

Transcript Highlights:
  • your testimony. your testimony.
  • Is there anyone testimony. All right.
  • Um, we're Appreciate your testimony.
  • Uh, thank you, Chair Robbins testimony.
  • Thank you testimony short. Thank you.
MN

Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session

House Workforce, Labor, and Economic Development Finance and Policy Committee 3/13/25

Workforce, Labor, and Economic Development Finance and Policy

Transcript Highlights:
  • I appreciate you taking my testimony and consideration to this bill.
  • There was a lot of testimony today.
  • We heard that in the last testimony in the delay bill.
  • We heard that in the last testimony in the delay bill.
  • think in line with previous testimony think in line with previous testimony the<01:42:32.239>
Bills: HF1976
NH

New Hampshire 2026 Regular Session

House Municipal and County Government (02/17/2026)

Municipal and County Government

Transcript Highlights:
  • Uh, we did hear testimony from the bill.
  • Rely on my previous testimony. >> Further comments?
  • My comment involves testimony by one of the witnesses to our committee.
  • the testim part a part of the testimony the testim part a part of the testimony was<06:06:03.120
  • <07:13:18.080> anything testimony nor was there anything testimony nor was there anything
Keywords: 928, house, all
Summary: The Municipal and County Government Committee met in executive session on February 17, 2026, to act on a series of bills. Early in the meeting, members agreed that they could consult the online submission summaries rather than have changing submission counts read aloud. The committee then took up House Bill 1386, which would have allowed citizens in a municipality to vote to require a financial audit of a local school district. Members opposing the bill argued that school districts already have audit authority and reporting requirements under existing law, and that the proposal was unnecessary and potentially burdensome. The committee voted 17-0 to recommend the bill inexpedient to legislate, placing it on the consent calendar. The committee next considered House Bill 1181FN on public hearing notice requirements for zoning board of adjustment appeals. Members who opposed the bill said newspaper publication provides independent third-party verification and archival value, and that removing that requirement would weaken public notice. The committee voted 17-0 ITL and sent the bill to the consent calendar. It also voted 17-0 ITL on House Bill 1327, concerning the definition of commercially zoned land, largely because the sponsor was absent and members said they could not do due diligence without hearing from the sponsor. The committee then acted on House Bill 1473FN, concerning the use of agricultural fairground property, and House Bill 1147, concerning the use of capital reserve funds. In both cases, members cited the sponsor’s absence and the need for more information as reasons to recommend inexpedient to legislate; both votes were 17-0 and both bills were placed on the consent calendar. House Bill 1220, which would have allowed municipal governing bodies to review and approve school budgets, was also recommended ITL by a 17-0 vote after members raised concerns about local control, legal conflicts between separate entities, and technical drafting problems. The committee recommended ought to pass on House Bill 118, which raises the amount of money municipal treasurers may hold before depositing it in the bank, with supporters saying the higher threshold would reduce unnecessary trips to the bank and improve efficiency. It also recommended ought to pass on House Bill 1151, a housekeeping bill correcting statutory references related to conservation commission appropriations, and it approved House Bill 1309 as amended after adopting Amendment 2026-0411H to clarify town meeting warrant language. Finally, the committee considered House Bill 1385, prohibiting negative property tax rates in certain municipalities, and recommended ITL by a 17-0 vote after testimony indicated the practice at issue had already ended and that a blanket prohibition could create problems for municipalities with excess revenues. The committee also began work on House Bill 1369, relating to posting warrants for special town meetings, and discussed an amendment to preserve newspaper notice while also allowing website posting where available.
NH

New Hampshire 2026 Regular Session

House Transportation (01/27/2026)

Transportation

Transcript Highlights:
  • that you had written testimony? that you had written testimony?
  • This is his written testimony. Uh, I don't see no written testimony, right? No. Okay.
  • written testimony for us. written testimony for us.
  • Just need your written testimony. testimony. testimony.
  • of<04:53:12.480> the testimony from representatives of the testimony from representatives
Keywords: 1189, house, all
NH

New Hampshire 2026 Regular Session

House Environment and Agriculture (02/17/2026)

Environment and Agriculture

Transcript Highlights:
  • you for your very thoughtful testimony you for your very thoughtful testimony on<04:19:32.239>
  • you for your testimony. Very valuable. you for your testimony. Very valuable.
  • . testimony. testimony.
  • Thank you so much for your testimony. testimony. testimony. >> Thank<05:20:25.440> you.
  • Thank you so much for your testimony. >> Thank you. >> Okay.
Keywords: 928, house, all
Summary: The subcommittee held an open work session on HB 1766-FN, a bill addressing cruelty to livestock, and focused on proposed language changes from the Department of Agriculture. Assistant State Veterinarian Nathan Harvey, speaking for the commissioner, explained concerns about the term “imminent danger,” arguing that the bill should allow seizure based on probable cause when an animal is starving or has a life-threatening condition, rather than tying action too closely to whether the owner is arrested. The department also proposed language on “extreme suffering” that would require euthanasia if the cost of treatment would exceed the allowable reimbursement amount under AGR rules, though members immediately raised concerns about using a dollar limit to require euthanasia. The department further suggested clarifying who may participate in investigations by allowing the state veterinarian or a designate, and noted that the current draft could be read too narrowly. Members discussed the $5,000 emergency care cap in the rules, with Josh Marshall confirming it is an aggregate emergency veterinary care limit. Several legislators said they were uncomfortable changing the bill from “may” to “shall” euthanize, arguing that treatment costs vary widely by species and condition and that a fixed monetary threshold could be too rigid. Representative Bixby also raised a separate concern that the bill’s language may be broader than intended and could apply to all animals rather than livestock only. The department agreed the bill should be limited to livestock and suggested using existing statutory definitions or adding a new section to make that clear. The discussion also turned to humane societies and other organizations that might investigate complaints or board seized animals. A representative from a humane organization said the groups with expertise in care often also have expertise useful to investigations, and that removing them entirely could be impractical because only a few facilities in the state can provide boarding. Members and witnesses explored alternative language that would allow for-profit and nonprofit organizations to participate in either the investigation or the care of livestock, but not both, to avoid conflicts of interest while preserving needed expertise. No votes were taken; the work session ended with agreement to consult the Office of Legislative Services and the department to refine the bill before the next meeting.
MN

Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session

Legislative Commission on Pensions and Retirement - 03/10/26

Minnesota Senate Floor Meeting

Transcript Highlights:
  • With that, please introduce yourself and present your testimony.
  • Please identify yourself and present your testimony. Mr.
  • <00:54:27.400> tonight, hearing all of the testimony tonight, hearing all of the testimony
  • If you could please introduce yourself and present your testimony.
  • <01:30:40.640> Hennessey Rice-oriented testimony. Ms. Hennessey Rice-oriented testimony.
Keywords: 1187, senate, all
MN

Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session

House Human Services Finance and Policy Committee 4/3/25

Human Services Finance and Policy

Transcript Highlights:
  • Please move the bill and proceed. testimony this morning in support of testimony this morning in support
  • Thank you so much for your testimony.
  • thank you so much for your testimony. thank you so much for your testimony.
  • Uh Thank you so much for the testimony.
  • record and continue with the testimony? record and continue with the testimony?
MN

Minnesota 2025 1st Special Session

Committee on State and Local Government - 04/03/25

State and Local Government

Transcript Highlights:
  • Uh, with that, uh, thank you for your testimony.
  • Uh members, any questions or testimony.
  • Thank you, Senator Hoffman, for that testimony.
  • Thank you, chair testimony or answer.
  • testimony or just answer questions? testimony or just answer questions?
Keywords: 1187, senate, all
MN

Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session

House Human Services Finance and Policy Committee 3/20/25

Human Services Finance and Policy

Transcript Highlights:
  • Thank you so much for your testimony.
  • with your testimony. Thank you, Chair. with your testimony. Thank you, Chair.
  • Thank you so much for your testimony.
  • Uh, and for the final your testimony.
  • Thank you so much for your testimony.
MN

Minnesota 2025 1st Special Session

House Agriculture Finance and Policy Committee 3/19/25

Agriculture Finance and Policy

Transcript Highlights:
  • Strom's first time facilitating virtual testimony, so we may have some glitches.
  • Michael Hansen, Consumer Reports senior scientist, continued his testimony.
  • We'll do questions at the end of testimony. Arlene Jones, Sprout Food Hub, via Zoom. Hi.
  • <00:58:27.760> and committee and they get testimony and committee and they get testimony and
  • We did hear testimony after we were back there, and that testimony could also be compelling upon each
MN

Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session

House Education Finance Committee 2/25/25

Education Finance

Transcript Highlights:
  • with your presentation and testimony with your presentation and testimony thank<00:04:24.680>
  • Thank you all for your testimony.
  • Thank you all for your testimony.
  • Thank you all for your testimony. Public testimony is now closed.
  • state thank you all for your testimony state thank you all for your testimony uh<01:16:42.360>
Bills: HF1, HF779, HF1034
WY

Wyoming 2026 Regular Session

House Corporations, Elections & Political Subdivisions, February 11, 2026

Corporations, Elections & Political Subdivisions

Transcript Highlights:
  • No one responded, and public testimony was closed on HB 83.
  • The chair closed public testimony on HB 83. It was moved and seconded.
  • close public testimony on House Bill<00:13:53.600> 84.
  • your testimony being handc counting. counting. counting.
  • Thank you guys for your testimony. Is there anybody else for public testimony in the room?