Video & Transcript Research : 'data disaggregation'
Page 193 of 500
HI
HI
HI
Hawaii 2026 Regular Session
ECD Public Hearing - Fri Feb 6, 2026 @ 8:30 AM HST
Economic Development & Technology
Transcript Highlights:
- We also have a data and AI office.
- So we are in support of this bill, and the measure requires our chief data officer, who is here today
- We're going to move now to HP 2499 relating to demographic data. Relating to demographic data.
- This bill upgrades the state open data portal with an AI chatbot and data visuals. have been transferred
- portal with an AI chatbot and data um portal with an AI chatbot and data um visuals. visuals. visuals
Bills:
HB1838, HB1870, HB2445, HB2540, HB1886, HB1839, HB2269, HB1939, HB2037, HB1635, HB1941, HB1576, HB2568, HB2267, HB2590, HB2266, HB2597, HB2499, HB2500, HB2502, HB2607, HB2137, HB2357, HB1782
Keywords:
HB1838, Hawaii, Act 142, U visa, T visa, U nonimmigrant status, T nonimmigrant status, immigration certification, visa certification, Form I-918 Supplement B, Form I-914 Supplement B, noncitizen victims, crime victim, human trafficking, victim helpfulness, law enforcement certification, prosecutor certification, judicial review, circuit court, confidentiality
Summary:
The committee opened testimony on House Bill 1838, relating to visas. Testifiers from the State Health Planning and Development Agency, the legal clinic, the Hawaii State Coalition Against Domestic Violence, the ACLU, CARES, and immigrant-rights groups strongly supported the bill, saying it would bring Hawaii into compliance with federal law, standardize and speed up certification for U and T visa applicants, and better protect survivors of crime and trafficking. Supporters emphasized that delays in certification can leave eligible survivors waiting years for federal visa access and can undermine public safety by discouraging victims from reporting crimes. The chair announced there were 103 testimonies in support and one in opposition, and the committee then moved on without taking a vote on the bill in the hearing.
The committee next heard House Bill 1870, concerning protected locations and immigration enforcement. Testimony from the Hawaii Coalition for Immigrant Rights, ACLU of Hawaii, educators, students, and community advocates supported limiting immigration enforcement at schools and other essential-service sites, arguing that families should be able to access education, health care, shelters, libraries, and social services without fear. The Department of Education said it had already issued guidance in March 2025 for how staff should respond when law enforcement comes onto campus, and the Public Charter School Commission noted implementation would need to occur at the school level. Testifiers said the bill would create standardized protocols and protect students and families from fear and disruption; the chair reported 142 testimonies in support, one in opposition, and five comments.
The committee then took up House Bill 2445, relating to student safety and law enforcement on campus. The Department of Education again said it had already rolled out statewide guidance and described its process for staff to notify administration, verify law enforcement identification and purpose, and route matters through the complex area superintendent and attorney general, while noting emergencies would be handled differently. A committee member questioned whether the procedures were sufficiently standardized and whether staff were trained for unusual situations. Student and community testifiers supported the bill, saying schools should remain safe havens and that clear procedures are needed if federal immigration enforcement appears on campus. The Department of Law Enforcement testified in opposition to parts of the measure, raising concerns about masking requirements, vehicle markings, officer safety, doxxing, retaliation, costs, and possible supremacy-clause conflicts, and suggested more exemptions and a compromise approach. The chair reported 106 testimonies in support, two comments, and no opposition for the bill before moving on to the next measure.
MN
Transcript Highlights:
- requests that that data be reviewed. requests that that data be reviewed.
- data again that we report on annually. data again that we report on annually.
- Ensure data includes disaggregation by race and disability.
- Ensure data includes schools.
- The data and collection is troublesome. The data and collection is troublesome.
Summary:
The Seclusion Working Group approved the minutes from its previous meeting by motion and vote. Members then began discussing a set of proposed recommendations submitted by Woodward, Havman, and Hull aimed at addressing concerns about the use of seclusion in special education settings.
The recommendations focused on several areas: requiring a mental health professional on the IEP team before seclusion is added to a student’s plan; replacing passive parental consent with explicit written consent in the parent’s native language; limiting seclusion to students receiving setting 3 or setting 4 services; requiring annual review of seclusion frequency and duration data by the IEP team; and creating stronger monitoring and accountability through a reporting system modeled on Minnesota’s existing disproportionality process. The group also proposed mandatory annual staff training, more preventive crisis-intervention supports such as CPI and Ukeru, direct funding and technical assistance for districts, and incorporating restraint/seclusion data into disproportionality calculations.
Members discussed how the proposed accountability system might work in practice, including whether a third party or parent reporting mechanism should be added. Woodward explained Minnesota’s current disproportionality framework, including year 1, year 2, and year 3 notifications and the possibility of required coordinated early intervening services if problems persist. Participants also raised concerns about whether schools should track law-enforcement involvement as an alternative or related response to student behavior; some noted that such data is already collected in certain district reporting systems and could be useful to monitor alongside seclusion data. The discussion remained ongoing, with no final action taken on the recommendations during this portion of the meeting.
MN
Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session
House Workforce, Labor, and Economic Development Finance and Policy Committee 2/25/26
Workforce, Labor, and Economic Development Finance and Policy
Transcript Highlights:
- recent data point 2025. recent data point 2025.
- <00:41:16.000>
and we are able to evaluate that data and we are able to evaluate that data - without legal status. looking at this data from it's it's this looking at this data from it's it's this
- Representative Berg said she appreciated the data disaggregation and the identification of different
- <01:11:35.679>
We are we do have some data on that. We are we do have some data on that.
Keywords:
workforce development, youth employment, internships, mentoring, job opportunities, digital platform, online portal, career pathways, youth workforce, employment and economic development, DEED, general fund appropriation, nonprofit grant, social media outreach, digital outreach, workforce opportunities, teen jobs, young adults, career exploration, Minnesota youth
MN
Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session
House Human Services Finance and Policy Committee 2/19/26
Human Services Finance and Policy
Transcript Highlights:
- data um data<00:13:58.480>
privacy <00:13:59.600>um <00:13:59.760>provisions <00 - data privacy um provisions in state law. data privacy um provisions in state law.
- full picture because um we have data full picture because um we have data privacy<00:14:13.199><
- Certainly, data ongoing needs there.
- prepayment review, what does better data prepayment review, what does better data analytics<01:02
TX
Transcript Highlights:
- But again, looking at the data. Yes.
- I mean, I think if you look at county-level data, you're going to see a lot of data points that show
- data.
- Again, we're looking at PIMS data.
- Again, we're looking at a PIMS data.
Summary:
The Senate Committee on Education K-16 convened with a quorum, adopted its committee rules, and heard opening remarks from members introducing staff and outlining priorities for the session. Members from both parties emphasized education as a major issue, while several Republicans framed the committee’s work around school choice and parent empowerment. Senator West and other Democrats stressed protecting public schools, listening to Texans, and considering the effects of vouchers or education savings accounts on school districts and communities.
Chairman Creighton laid out Senate Bill 2, the Texas Education Freedom Act, describing it as a universal education savings account program modeled on similar programs in other states. He said the bill would provide about $200 million for a universal eligibility pool and additional funding for students with disabilities and lower-income families, with priority weighting for former public school students. He also highlighted anti-fraud measures, vendor pre-approval, criminal background checks, cybersecurity protections, annual testing requirements for participating students, and the use of the Comptroller rather than TEA to administer the program. Creighton repeatedly said the bill is not a voucher and argued it would not take money from public schools, which he said would receive separate historic funding increases.
Members questioned Creighton about the 500% of federal poverty line definition, the adequacy of the $10,000 ESA amount, whether the program would favor students already in private school, how microschools and homeschool pods would fit, and whether the bill protects religious liberty and private-school autonomy. Democrats raised concerns about disability protections, 504 students, foster children, public-school funding, open records, and the historical context of vouchers. Republicans generally supported the bill as a way to expand options for parents and students, while also asking about administration, fraud prevention, and data security. After member questions, the committee began invited testimony, with EdChoice President Robert Inlow presenting in support of SB 2 and citing the growth and reported success of school choice programs nationwide.
NH
New Hampshire 2026 Regular Session
Committee of Conference on HB 1306, HB 751 (5/28/26)
MS
Mississippi 2026 Regular Session
Ports and Marine Resources (Part 2)- Room 216, 2 March, 2026; 3:30 PM
MD
HI
Hawaii 2026 Regular Session
EEP Public Hearing - Thu Apr 11, 2024 @ 9:00 AM HST
HI
Hawaii 2026 Regular Session
CMV/JHA Joint Public Hearing - Fri Mar 15, 2024 @ 9:45 AM HST
KY
Kentucky 2026 Regular Session
House Standing Committee on Small Business and Information Technology (3-13-24)
HI
Keywords:
HI Senate YouTube, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XAhlAyboOf4, 2026-07-02T01:23:16+00:00, 2.2.24, Data collected via generic collector engine, Briefing Notice:
https://www.capitol.hawaii.gov/sessions/session2024/hearingnotices/HEARING_EET_02-22-24_INFO_.pdf, 912, senate, all, 2.2.42, 2.1.47
HI
Hawaii 2026 Regular Session
LGO/JHA Joint Public Hearing - Tue Feb 13, 2024 @ 9:30 AM HST
HI
Hawaii 2026 Regular Session
WAL/JHA Public Hearing - Mon Feb 12, 2024 @ 2:00 PM HST
HI
Hawaii 2026 Regular Session
HET Public Hearing - Fri Feb 9, 2024 @ 2:00 PM HST
HI
Hawaii 2026 Regular Session
LGO/EDN Joint Public Hearing - Thu Feb 8, 2024 @ 10:00 AM HST
HI
Hawaii 2026 Regular Session
CPC Public Hearing - Thu Feb 8, 2024 @ 2:00 PM HST
HI