Transcript Highlights:

• SB 1113, services of possess evaluate agencies.
• SB 1113, services to possess evaluate agencies.
• SB 1124, health boards evaluations notices. SB 1125, DCS memorandum of understanding tribes.

Keywords: 1182, all

Transcript Highlights:

• also honored to come to work every day to work with an extraordinary team of analysts, economists, evaluators
• And along with that, the excellent work that your team does for program evaluation—I mean, really rigorous
• , high-quality research that I think gives us a leg up as an appropriating body to evaluate our decisions

Summary: The committee heard a final wrap-up presentation from Director So Lee on the Legislative Finance Committee’s budget framework for the upcoming session. He said the state remains in a strong fiscal position, though revenue estimates are lower than earlier projections and available nonrecurring funds have declined by more than $1 billion from the prior session. He emphasized that the recommendation still preserves reserves above 30 percent and supports targeted investments in the committee’s three priorities: increasing per capita earned income through education and workforce development, improving access to high-quality health care and behavioral health, and enhancing quality of life through infrastructure, water, parks, trails, and other community amenities. Director Lee highlighted several major funding areas, including a proposed expansion of the UNM medical education program, water projects, capital outlay for state agency assets, and use of a mix of severance tax bonds, general obligation bonds, and cash for capital needs. He also noted continued pressure from health insurance, liability, and compensation costs, and said the committee would keep using pilot programs for new initiatives. Members broadly praised the staff, interim travel, and budget analysis work. During member comments, Senator Woods focused on school funding stability, liability costs, and fraud or waste in state agencies, arguing the state should take more claims to court to establish precedent and better protect taxpayers. Other members thanked staff and leadership for their work and collaboration. The committee then adopted the catch-up cleanup items and the overall LFC budget framework, with Senator Woods recorded in opposition, and created a technical committee with members from both chambers to resolve any final technical issues before the January session.

Transcript Highlights:

• <00:31:03.120> by skills, and they should be evaluated by skills, and they should be evaluated
• By reviewing the best needs for our counties, cities, and towns, the topic would evaluate the balance
• By reviewing the best needs for our counties, cities, and towns, the topic would evaluate the balance
• We're still evaluating our official position on that, but Mr.
• c><01:26:18.800> official >> We're still evaluating our official >> We're still evaluating

Keywords: 916, all

Summary: The chairman opened by explaining that the committee would hear proposed interim topics and then rank them by written submissions rather than debating them one by one. The Public Service Commission presented two topics: an educational session on small water utilities, citing maintenance needs, water-quality compliance, and difficulty accessing capital, and a review of civil penalties for pipeline safety violations because Wyoming’s statutory penalties are far below federal levels and could affect compliance and funding. Members and outside presenters then outlined a range of additional topics. Representative Campbell proposed work on fire protection districts and EMS districts, focusing on financial stability, mill levies, and possible county authority to combine districts and levies. He also raised public records at meetings, corporate filing fees, and fraudulent corporate filings. The Community College Commission proposed updating annexation statutes so communities can join community college districts more easily, especially where current mill-levy rules create funding issues. Senator Crago supported the fraudulent corporate filings topic and noted related technology-based solutions and overlap with blockchain issues. Other proposals included CPA “Pathways” licensing changes to address a shortage of accountants, a review of public meetings and public records laws, continuation of the electricity study with emphasis on grid reliability and large-load capacity constraints, and a broader review of the public meetings and records act. Ashley Harpstreith of the Wyoming Association of Municipalities supported extending municipal audit deadlines and described a statewide shortage of auditors and CPAs. Healthy Wyoming proposed studying health coverage options for low-income working adults, including state-sponsored or cooperative models. Representative Chestek proposed making most nonpartisan county offices elected on a nonpartisan basis. No votes or final selections were taken in the portion provided; the committee mainly heard testimony and discussed whether topics should be assigned to this committee or another one.

Transcript Highlights:

• co-design evidence-based, practitioner-driven solutions that improve our outcomes, and to continuously evaluate
• co-design evidence-based, practitioner-driven solutions that improve our outcomes, and to continuously evaluate
• co-design evidence-based, practitioner-driven solutions that improve our outcomes and to continuously evaluate
• Um, the transfer center assists students with transfer admission, credit evaluation, and advising.
• This addition will allow us to more quickly improve transfer evaluation times, helping students make

Keywords: 958, all

Summary: The House Standing Committee on Postsecondary Education opened its first meeting with roll call, member introductions, and introductions of numerous interns from Kentucky colleges and universities. The chair reviewed committee rules for the 2026 session, including witness oaths, sign-up procedures, limits on testimony, and the deadline for submitting committee substitutes and amendments. The committee then took up House Bill 96, sponsored by Chair Tipton, which would revise the membership and timing of the performance-based funding work group. Tipton said the bill would expand legislative participation from one House and one Senate member to five from each chamber, keep university and KCTCS presidents on the group, make the CPE president a nonvoting chair, and change the work group’s schedule from a fiscal year to a calendar year. He argued the changes would build institutional knowledge, allow university leaders to meet without creating quorum/open-meeting issues, and help the group develop recommendations for the next General Assembly. Members raised concerns about politicization and the even-numbered membership, while Tipton said he wanted consensus rather than a tied vote. The committee approved HB 96 on a roll call vote, with most members voting yes and Representative Willner voting no but saying she might change her vote later on the House floor. The committee also heard House Bill 94 for discussion only, so no vote was taken. Representative Vanessa Gracel and CPE counsel Travis Pal described the bill as a transfer-pathways measure aimed at making two-year-to-four-year and four-year-to-four-year transfers more seamless in high-demand programs. They said the proposal would require CPE, public universities, and KCTCS to collaborate on statewide transfer pathways based on student and workforce demand, with institutions able to opt in or out of specific pathways but required to disclose nontransferable courses for transparency. Gracel argued the bill would reduce credit loss, lower time and cost to degree, improve completion rates, and help students and families understand transfer options; she also criticized some universities for not engaging in the process. No action was taken on HB 94 at this meeting.

Transcript Highlights:

• Sometimes there's concern about whether they need some sort of evaluation or therapy, and they might
• It can go for dismissal, or there's a confidential inquiry and preliminary evaluation.
• So during the confidential evaluation, the judge generally is not aware of it, at least from the board's
• they they know that if they evaluation they they know that if they they<00:46:12.319> can<00:
• how they plan determining an evaluating how they plan to<01:17:12.080> move<01:17:12.320>

Keywords: 1183, house

Summary: The Judiciary and Civil Law Committee met to hear an informational presentation from the Board of Judicial Standards. After brief member and staff introductions and a review of committee rules, the board’s executive secretary, Sarah Bas, and Mary Pat Maher explained the board’s history, mission, and operations. They described the board as an independent state agency that handles complaints about judicial misconduct and disability, issues advisory opinions, and educates judges on ethics. The presentation covered the board’s composition, complaint intake and screening process, and the levels of discipline available, ranging from summary dismissal and letters of caution to private admonitions, deferred disposition agreements, public reprimands, and formal complaints that can lead to Supreme Court review. Members asked about the board’s budget, public access to discipline records, confidentiality of complaints, and how the board balances accountability with protecting public confidence in the judiciary. The board said public discipline is posted on its website, while private admonitions, deferred dispositions, dismissals, and letters of caution remain confidential. It also said judges generally are told who complained so they can respond, though the board can withhold the source for good cause. Questions also focused on whether attorneys are underreporting misconduct, how many complaints are nuisance complaints, and whether the online complaint system changed the types of complaints received; the board said nuisance complaints make up more than half, the complaint types have not changed much, and it does not have data comparing complaint sources to outcomes. No votes or formal committee actions were taken.

Transcript Highlights:

• We also recommended revising the psychological evaluation.
• At the time of these talk stories, there was one individual doing all evaluations for every incoming
• Uh, we don't have the mental health staffing to do the evaluations on everybody going out the door.
• <01:12:16.800> on health Staffing to do the evaluations on health Staffing to do the evaluations
• We just started an initiative with the 704 cases for the evaluations.

Keywords: 912, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• We are formally evaluating the READ Act implementation efforts again.
• A little bit about the REACT evaluation: I know I'm getting close to time here.
• I know I'm about the react evaluation I know I'm getting<00:25:20.240> close<00:25:20.480>
• plan in place have a formal evaluation plan in place and<00:25:31.120> these<00:25:31.360>
• and then we're continually re-evaluating and then we're continually re-evaluating the<00:29:45.519

Keywords: 1187, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• Line 36 is an appropriation for a biosolid and sewage sludge technical evaluation panel.
• Paragraph J generates money to the M.D.A. to evaluate the economic and environmental performance of Olmstead
• Anderson's bill **HF 2683** that we heard last Wednesday and includes a new requirement that the **NDA** evaluate

Transcript Highlights:

• As the event progresses, we evaluate what the National Weather Service is saying.
• 12.000> progresses, as the event progresses, as the event progresses, we<00:15:13.760> evaluate
• we evaluate we evaluate what<00:15:15.760> the<00:15:16.160> National<00:15:16.560
• But also still evaluating rivers and dams and so forth.
• But<01:23:30.240> also<01:23:30.600> still But also still But also still evaluating evaluating

Bills: SCR21, SCR75, SCR50, SCR149, SCR47, SCR163, SCR169, SCR170

Keywords: healthcare, rural clinic, feasibility study, access to care, community health, Volcano community, Hawaiʻi Health Systems Corporation, emergency services, health assessment, Fetal Alcohol Spectrum Disorders, health care, interdepartmental collaboration, public awareness, support services, education, health insurance, affordable healthcare, working group, Hawaii Health Plan, Medicaid expansion

Transcript Highlights:

• And then the third phase is implementation and evaluation.
• I'm the Equity Measures and Evaluation Manager at the California Arts Council and the project manager
• Lastly, it's really to get into implementation and evaluation.
• This is an iterative and long-term process, and so we see a lot of moments of reflection, evaluation,
• Lastly, it's really to get into implementation and evaluation.

Keywords: 987, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• “So this process sets up a way to enter into an evaluation process with both an operator and a landowner
• But if you do have a willing operator and a willing landowner, you can enter into this evaluation process
• There's a process when we use the evaluation process that everybody tests and then somewhat goes to C
• There's a process when we use the evaluation process that everybody tests and then somewhat goes to C
• Through the evaluation process, you're going to test and sample, and you're going to submit that data

Summary: The House Natural Resources Committee met on April 29, 2026, with a quorum present and took up several bills related to property rights, expropriation, renewable energy recycling, and local permitting. Representative Domangue first presented HCR 80 on private property rights, using it to highlight the 2025 landman code of conduct and the need for stronger guardrails in expropriation negotiations. She then deferred the resolution in order to allow Chairman Geymann to present HB 841, which was described as establishing a code of conduct for landmen and expropriation-related negotiations. The committee heard testimony and watched video examples from landowners describing intimidation, inadequate compensation offers, and the need for fair treatment. Amendments were adopted to broaden the bill to all certificate holders, prohibit threats about court costs and attorney fees, shorten response times, and add graduated fines and public posting for violations. HB 841 was reported favorably as amended, with no opposition cards recorded. The committee then considered HB 621 by Representative Coates, which would require recycling of decommissioned renewable energy infrastructure to the extent practical. After discussion with DEQ, the bill was amended to clarify that existing universal waste rules apply and to remove language that would have required the renewable facility owner to pay decommissioning costs in that section; the effective date was set for January 1, 2027. Testimony from renewable energy industry representatives supported the measure and explained that solar panels and related components can be recycled at high rates, with established markets for recovered materials. The committee adopted the amendments and reported HB 621 favorably. Next, Representative Jacob Landry presented HB 595, aimed at preventing local governments from unreasonably delaying or impeding energy projects through permit requirements, especially road permits affecting Haynesville Shale operations. After amendment, the bill required timely action on local road permits and deemed them approved if not acted on within 30 days. Supporters emphasized the economic importance of the Haynesville and the need for predictable permitting, while opponents argued the bill could further erode local authority, particularly regarding carbon capture and sequestration. The committee reported HB 595 favorably. Landry then presented HB 1191, creating a certificate of compliance process for oilfield and exploration and production sites to provide a cleaner path for cleanup, finality, and future investment. The bill drew technical and substantive amendments, including changes to definitions, confidentiality, and the role of DEQ; discussion continued over whether the bill should be deferred to allow more time to work through the remaining issues.

Transcript Highlights:

• So this process sets up a way to enter into an evaluation process with both an operator and a landowner
• There's a process when we use the evaluation process that everybody tests and then somewhat goes to C
• There's a process when we use the evaluation process that everybody tests and then somewhat goes to C
• The response was that it does: the evaluation process includes testing and sampling, submission of data
• The speaker said each successor would require a new evaluation from C&E.

Keywords: 965, house, all

Summary: The committee first heard HCR 80 by Representative Domangue, which expressed support for private property rights and reviewed the 2025 landman code of conduct. Domangue described concerns about aggressive landmen and expropriation threats, then voluntarily deferred the resolution so Chairman Geymann could present his bill. The committee then took up HB 841, also on expropriation procedures and landman conduct. Geymann explained the bill was aimed at how expropriation negotiations are conducted and enforced, not at whether expropriation is allowed, and cited a recent dispute involving a pipeline right-of-way and threatening letters to landowners. A video of affected landowners was played, and members from industry and landowner groups discussed the need for fair compensation and better communication. The committee adopted two amendment sets to HB 841. The first set made technical changes, removed some court-cost language, broadened the code of conduct to all certificate holders, added a prohibition on threatening landowners with court costs and attorney fees, shortened the response period for offers, and clarified that the rules apply across energy types rather than only carbon capture. The second amendment set added graduated fines for violations, required the Department of Conservation and Energy to collect the fines, and directed the department to post violators on its website. After support testimony and no opposition, HB 841 was reported favorably as amended. The committee next considered HB 621 by Representative Coates, which requires recycling of decommissioned renewable energy infrastructure to the extent practical. An amendment clarified that existing DEQ recycling rules apply. Members raised concerns about decommissioning language, costs, and whether the bill overlapped with existing hazardous-waste and universal-waste rules. Coates agreed to remove the bill’s last sentence on decommissioning costs and add an effective date of January 1, 2027. DEQ explained that many components are already covered under federal and state universal-waste rules, and industry witnesses said solar recycling is feasible and already occurring. HB 621 was then reported favorably as amended. Finally, the committee heard HB 595 by Representative Jacob Landry, which addresses local permits that impede natural resource development, especially road permits affecting Haynesville shale operations. An amendment clarified that local governments may not unreasonably interfere with permitted activity and that road permits not acted on within 30 days are deemed approved. Supporters said delayed parish permits can stall rigs, reduce investment, and hurt royalty owners, while opponents warned the bill could further erode local authority, including in carbon capture matters. Police jury representatives said they were willing to keep working on the issue and suggested a 30- to 45-day target for permit decisions. HB 595 was reported favorably as amended. The committee then began HB 1191 by Representative Landry, creating a certificate of compliance process for oilfield and exploration and production sites, with testimony that it could help clear environmental liability and bring properties back into commerce; the bill was still under amendment and questioning when the transcript ended.

Transcript Highlights:

• Cook—talking about the replacement value, so you can have a 25-year-old barn, but you evaluate that as
• I think there is a way to look at the five years, how you evaluate this, and move it into statute.
• this shift would be having statutory caps if there's shift at all because you're going to have to evaluate
• Cook, talking about the replacement value so you can have a 25-year-old barn, but you evaluate that as
• stuff it's really not apples and apples I think there is a way to look at the five years how you evaluate

Bills: HB2014, HB2031, HB2078, HB2102, HB2103, HB2117, HB2261, HB2262, HB2264, HB2278, HB2428, HB2494, HB2756, HB2758, HB2762, HB2782, HB2932, HB2933, HB2986

Keywords: air emissions, fuel blends, environmental quality, feasibility study, Arizona Department of Agriculture, water rights, groundwater, Willcox, active management area, certificate of grandfathered rights, Arizona legislature, aggregate mining, reclamation plans, environmental protection, public safety, land use, domestic water, improvement district, water delivery, water hauling

Transcript Highlights:

• It moves the requirement for mandatory alcohol evaluation from a BAC of 0.18 to a BAC of 0.16.
• During the alcohol evaluation, an evaluator determines whether there are underlying substance abuse issues
• The national average where an alcohol evaluation is required is a BAC of 0.15.
• This mandatory evaluation is an opportunity to address underlying causes of substance abuse and to hopefully
• Specifically, it allows a provider who is on the person's treating team to participate in the evaluation

Keywords: 909, all

Transcript Highlights:

• A staff appraiser from the Department evaluated the property based on its contributory value, which was
• A staff appraiser from the Department evaluated the property based on its contributory value, which was
• A staff appraiser from the Department evaluated the property based on its contributory value, which was
• 41:48.119> from<00:41:48.200> the<00:41:48.319> Department<00:41:48.720> evaluate
• appraiser from the Department evaluate appraiser from the Department evaluate the<00:41:49.319><

Keywords: 928, house, all

Summary: The Long Range Capital Planning and Utilization Committee met in organizational session and first elected Representative John Cluder as clerk. A nomination of Senator Mark Makoni as vice chair was made but not voted on because he was absent; it was carried over to the next meeting. The committee also reviewed its guidelines and procedures, including how it handles property-disposal requests, late items, and informational materials, and then approved the November 12, 2024 minutes with one abstention from a member who had been absent. The committee then considered several state property and lease requests. It approved a 50-year, $1-per-year ground lease for about 5.66 acres at Berlin Regional Airport in Milan for a New Hampshire Army National Guard hangar/support facility, after hearing that the project is federally funded, intended for training and search-and-rescue support, and would have no permanent full-time staffing. The committee also approved a 30-year lease for the Department of Justice to move the chief medical examiner’s offices, morgue, and autopsy suite to 279 Pleasant Street in Concord, with testimony that the current Concord Hospital space is inadequate and that the new site would double body-storage capacity. Several Department of Safety and Department of Transportation property items were approved as well. Safety received approval for a 10-year lease, with renewal options, for the State Police aircraft hangar at 91 Airport Road in Concord. Transportation was authorized to continue disposal efforts for remnant parcels in Concord, Conway, Lisbon, Effingham, and Mount Vernon, with testimony explaining market conditions, appraisals, access limits, and easements; members asked questions about access and buildability, but each item was approved. During the Berlin lease item, the committee was told the FAA objects to any lease longer than 50 years at that airport, so the request was revised from 55 years to 50 years on the record before approval.

Transcript Highlights:

• We see these stress tests where we evaluate how far our revenues could fall in the event of an emergency
• Okay, I think that bears a little bit further evaluation.
• If the evaluators could stand up, they are led by Ms.
• Whether that's a program evaluation, what do we need to do with CYFD?
• We're going to look at how we evaluate and the structure with which we approach this really important

Transcript Highlights:

• So could you first of all tell us, has that evaluation report been released?
• <00:52:32.000> their operational structure and evaluate their operational structure and evaluate
• Uh, again, I mentioned Baker Tilly, formerly Moss Adams, as a third-party evaluation firm.
• Uh, no, we were not tasked with evaluating the private foundation.
• evaluating the, you know, the private<01:09:00.799> foundation.

Keywords: 958, all

Summary: The committee met with a full quorum and approved the prior minutes. Members offered introductions of guests and family members, then heard a presentation from University of Louisville President Thomas Jared Bradley, who was sworn in before testifying. He described his background and outlined U of L’s strategic priorities: student success, access and affordability, workforce development, community engagement, and research. Bradley highlighted enrollment growth, increases in first-generation and Pell-eligible students, strong transfer pathways with KCTCS, and support programs such as the Cardinal Commitment Grant, 15-to-Finish, Comeback Cards, tutoring, mentoring, and mental health services. Bradley also emphasized U of L’s statewide and regional impact through UofL Health, rural outreach, the Bullitt County rural cancer education and research center, nursing expansion, and the Kentucky Manufacturing Extension Partnership program. He noted major institutional distinctions, including R1 status, a new Carnegie Opportunity College and University designation, and community-engaged classification. He said the university is one of only 10 public universities nationwide with all three designations and reported record enrollment, improved retention, and strong research expenditures. He also thanked lawmakers for significant capital and operating support, including funding for the simulation center, health science center, asset preservation, and the MEP program. During questions, members praised the university’s public service role and asked about first-generation enrollment, retention, graduation rates, and post-graduation outcomes. Bradley said the university is working to improve completion by expanding academic support, early alerts, incentives for tutoring, and faculty/advisor mentoring, especially for first-generation and high-need students. He acknowledged that post-graduation employment data is difficult to collect but said the new Carnegie classification reflects positive outcomes. No votes were taken beyond approving the minutes, and no formal actions were taken on legislation in this portion of the meeting.

Transcript Highlights:

• and premier experts in digital behavioral health interventions for youth, conducted an external evaluation
• Our mission is to provide evaluation and treatment in a safe and responsible manner by leading innovation
• Our primary tools are data and policy research, program evaluation, grantmaking, technical assistance
• We also evaluate programs so California can learn from implementation, improve performance over time,
• We also evaluate programs so California can learn from implementation, improve performance over time,

Keywords: 988, house, all

Transcript Highlights:

• We did, from day one, build an extensive evaluation of this program to be able to evaluate initially
• And they've evaluated Farm to School as a very valuable program, but it doesn't meet the standard of
• And what we've done initially with our evaluation,” “What we've done initially with our evaluation, knowing
• So I feel like there's more measurement to do, but we're committed to the evaluation to make sure that
• I'd have to work with our evaluation team to pull a specific number because it's so, what's the word?

Summary: The meeting began with a lengthy opening discussion with Secretary Karen Ross of the Department of Food and Agriculture, who reviewed the department’s proposed budget, emphasized California agriculture’s record output, and highlighted major priorities including climate-smart agriculture, groundwater management, local food systems, farm-to-school, food hubs, invasive pest prevention, bird flu response, and food safety. She also warned about federal budget cuts, especially at USDA and FDA, and discussed market access challenges abroad, rising input costs, labor shortages, and the need for automation and workforce training. Members raised questions about the future of Farm to School, the California Nutrition Incentive Program/Market Match, local food procurement, and how to better connect farmers to schools, food banks, and food hubs; Ross said the department had strong evidence the program benefits small farms and Title I schools and noted continued interest in building out local food infrastructure. The committee then took up item one on eliminating vacant positions at the Departments of Fish and Wildlife, Parks and Recreation, and Food and Agriculture. The Legislative Analyst’s Office explained that the Governor proposed eliminating 6,000 vacant positions statewide, with the Joint Legislative Budget Committee previously rejecting 650 of them, including 174 in these three departments. LAO and Finance said the vacancies represented a source of budget flexibility, but warned that eliminating them could create program impacts; LAO recommended retaining the special-funded positions at Fish and Wildlife and Food and Agriculture, while weighing the General Fund positions against other priorities. Finance argued the reductions were part of a broader budget-resiliency exercise and that departments could reclassify or shift vacancies to higher priorities. Members focused heavily on the practical impacts of the cuts. Assemblymember Petrie-Norris argued that Fish and Wildlife staffing shortages were already slowing permits needed for housing, clean energy, water, and transportation projects, and questioned the value of saving relatively small amounts of money. Fish and Wildlife officials said the department had prioritized mission-critical work and could still meet permitting obligations, but acknowledged limited-term staffing constraints. State Parks said the proposed ranger and maintenance cuts would not have immediate effects but could slow maintenance and eventually worsen deferred maintenance. Food and Agriculture said some of the eliminated positions supported early pest detection and eradication, but that the department believed it could still meet its mandate and reclassify positions if needed. The chair and several members signaled concern about the Fish and Wildlife and Parks cuts, while also noting the broader need for budget reductions. The committee then moved to item six, hearing an overview from the Governor’s Office of Land Use and Climate Innovation. Staff described the office’s role in CEQA implementation and said the budget requests were baseline funding to maintain existing functions, including IT services and administrative/legislative support, rather than new programs. The chair asked the presenters to move quickly through background material so the committee could get to questions, and the item began with no votes taken during the meeting.

Transcript Highlights:

• It's good for the school district uh as they evaluate.
• It's good for the school district uh as they evaluate.
• So we still do have the they evaluate.
• Uh and this uh initial evaluation<00:25:52.400> allows<00:25:52.799> for<00:25:53.039><
• for the review of that evaluation allows for the review of that collaboration<00:25:54.799> between

Bills: HB0023, HB0024, HB0025

Keywords: extracurricular activities, public school participation, enrollment, Wyoming, student access, charter schools, application process, authorizers, public hearing, community support, scholarship, education, eligibility, continuous enrollment, 916, all