Transcript Highlights:

• On page three, section 4A, we struck the entire last sentence that starts with, "If the local tax cap
• uh uh section 4A, we struck the entire last<02:09:38.000><c> sentence</c><02:09:38.400><c> that</c><
• </c> violation of this section shall be void. violation of this section shall be void.
• So it would be that section of the RSA.
• There'd be a new section put in section two. >> And did you want to give me those words for the rulemaking

Committee: Senate Election Law and Municipal Affairs

Keywords: 1191, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• So moving down into the same section, you know, when you hit section 6 and it talks about going on the
• I think this is because this is a new section of code; it just continues it.
• So moving down into the same section, you know, when you hit section 6 and it talks about going on the
• I think this is because this is a new section of code it just continues it.
• If you look down to Section B, fewer than 50 employees... ...down to Section B, fewer than 50 employees

Committee: House Business

Summary: The committee first approved the February 11 minutes, then unanimously sent House Bill 721 to the floor with a due pass recommendation. HB 721, sponsored by Representative Crane, expands an existing 30-day initial plan review timeline from public school projects to all public works projects. Crane and supporters from the Idaho Associated General Contractors said the bill would improve efficiency, reduce regulatory burden, and let projects go to bid sooner; no opposition testified. The committee then heard extensive testimony on House Bill 618, a wildfire insurance transparency bill sponsored by Representatives Sauter and Church. The bill would require insurers using wildfire or catastrophe models to disclose certain risk-model information and mitigation-related details to policyholders and to the Department of Insurance, with annual data collection and website posting. Sponsors and several homeowners and fire-related witnesses said the measure would help consumers understand nonrenewals, appeal ratings, and learn what mitigation steps matter; opponents, including the American Property Casualty Insurance Association and some committee members, argued it could expose proprietary information, increase compliance costs, and raise premiums. After debate, the committee rejected a motion to send the bill forward and instead voted to hold HB 618 in committee. House Bill 817, sponsored by Representative Petsky, was then advanced to the floor with a due pass recommendation. The bill would allow mobile cigar-event businesses and related “cigar garden” operations under tobacco permitting rules, with age restrictions and compliance checks still in place. Supporters described it as a small-business and entrepreneurship update, while opponents worried mobile retail would make tobacco compliance enforcement harder; the sponsor said the Department of Health and Welfare believed enforcement could still work. Finally, the committee began hearing House Bill 801 from Representative Redman, which would ease land-use barriers for faith-based organizations to develop housing and related uses on religious land. Redman said the bill is intended to help churches use underutilized land for attainable housing and services, while preserving guardrails such as setbacks from heavy industrial uses, airports, and military zones. Members raised concerns about parking, building height, setbacks, and airport rules, and Redman said he was open to amendments; the transcript ends during that discussion before any final action on HB 801.

Transcript Highlights:

• Secondly, also in Section 3, we ask to include provisions that were included in the bill as a pass out
• That seems to be very, very broad, and we'd encourage you again to, frankly, remove that section.
• My name is Tiani Milner, and I am the section chief of the Major Economic Crimes Unit of the Attorney
• My name is Tiani Milner and I am the section chief of the major economic crimes unit of the Attorney
• The Attorney General's Office is very much sectioned and has diverse powers just as a county prosecutor

Committee: Senate Law & Justice

Keywords: 904, all

Transcript Highlights:

• This section would take effect July 1, 2026. There's no state revenue impact.
• This section would take effect July 1, 2026.
• This section would take effect July 1, 2026, and has no revenue impact.
• That section is removed.
• This section results in no revenue impact to the state property tax levy.

Bills: HB2559 , HB2135 , HB2133 , HB2442

Committee: House Finance

Keywords: affordable housing, local government funding, housing programs, community development, financial assistance, adaptive housing, disabled veterans, tax preferences, housing affordability, retail sales tax, property tax, senior citizens, tax exemption, permanent legislation, local government, tax authority, sales tax, use tax, real estate excise tax, REET

Transcript Highlights:

• First, going to section three, which is the only section in the bill that pertains to hospitals.
• I'm an advocate for the Purple Alert section in SB 6070.
• I'm here today as Jonathan Huang's sister to speak in support of section four of Bill 6070.
• Article I, Section 7, guarantees that people shall not be disturbed in their private affairs without
• And lastly, the third section, section 3.6, the hit from the ALPR camera should be sufficient as reasonable

Summary: The committee heard public testimony on four bills. SB 5925 would expand the Attorney General’s civil investigative demand authority to investigate possible violations of the U.S. and Washington constitutions, certain labor and civil rights laws, law enforcement use-of-force issues, and jail-related statutes. Supporters, including the Attorney General’s office, Teamsters 117, and Working Washington, said the bill would make investigations faster and more effective, especially in wage theft and discrimination cases. Opponents, including police, sheriffs, cities, counties, and retail and business groups, argued it would give the AG broad investigative power without enough threshold showing, could burden local governments and employers, and raised constitutional concerns about speech and search protections. No vote was taken. SB 5906 would codify and expand protections for non-public spaces in schools, child care facilities, health care facilities, higher education institutions, and county auditor election areas by limiting immigration enforcement access without a judicial warrant or court order and restricting collection of immigration-related information about students and families. Supporters said the bill would reduce fear, protect privacy, and make existing Keep Washington Working policies clearer and more durable, with testimony from immigrant rights groups, faith organizations, students, PTA, and health advocates. Some organizations, including health care and child care stakeholders, supported the goal but asked for amendments to clarify definitions, create model policies, add training and enforcement provisions, and adjust warrant/subpoena language. The committee also heard strong opposition concerns about federal immigration enforcement, but no action was taken. SB 6070 would expand missing-person tools by allowing certain digital investigative tools to be used in missing endangered person cases, creating new Abney and Purple Alerts for missing Black people and people with disabilities, and broadening the definition of missing endangered person. Supporters included prosecutors, law enforcement, tribal and disability advocates, families of missing persons, and students who argued that faster alerts and better digital tools save lives and address racial and disability disparities in missing-person responses. Testimony described delays in prior cases and the need for more urgent, targeted alerts. The committee then heard SB 6002, which would regulate automated license plate reader systems, set registration, use, retention, audit, and disclosure rules, and prohibit certain uses such as immigration enforcement and surveillance near protected locations. The sponsor said the bill is intended to create statewide guardrails for a technology already in use, and testimony was expected to continue after the excerpt ended; no vote or final action was recorded in the portion provided.

Transcript Highlights:

• Section 2063.004 expressly directs the two entities to collaborate.
• Three major sections: the Cybersecurity Threat Intelligence Center, the Cybersecurity Incident Response
• If SB 2721 is enacted, that section has no effect.
• It is actually affecting section 9 as to the applicability of the bill and making it immediate effect
• This bill does not change any of the protections in place for consumers under Section 1304.

Bills: HB146 , HB150 , HB1500 , HB1545 , HB1562 , HB2067 , HB2520 , HB2818 , HB3214 , HB3250 , HB3466 , HB3512 , HB3623 , HB4063 , HB4395 , HB4464 , HB4668 , HB4690 , HB5331 , HB3833 , HB146 , HB150

Committee: Senate Business & Commerce

Keywords: HB 146, Texas Capitol, State Capitol, State Preservation Board, Congress Avenue, Travis County, traffic lanes, lane closure, road closure, municipal authority, local control, Capitol area, downtown Austin, special events, construction traffic plan, pedestrian safety, public works, transportation policy, government code chapter 443, cybersecurity

Transcript Highlights:

• WE ARE RISING IN OPPOSITION TO SECTION 74 OF THE BILL.
• THIS SECTION WE BELIEVE CREATES A PROPER RIGHT OF ACTION DEALING WITH FINANCIAL DISCRIMINATION.
• CONCERNS AND PROBLEMS BUT THAT'S FOR ANOTHER DAY. >> Senator Davis: IN SECTION SEVEN.
• Ingoglia: NOT LAST QUESTION BUT WHAT I'D LIKE YOU TO LOOK AT IS I'M INTERESTED IN SECTION 16.
• IF SOMEBODY CAN HELP ME FIND OUT WHERE SECTION 16 STARTS. >> Sen.

Keywords: 999, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• This is governed by statute section 1011.45, which requires universities to maintain a 7% reserve and
• And then the last section is component units, which include direct support organizations, along with
• And then the last section is component units, which include direct support organizations, operations,
• And the last section is all other. And that's the sort of tanish, light gray section.
• And the last section is all other. And that's the sort of tanish, light gray section.

Summary: The Higher Education Budget Subcommittee met to hear an overview of State University System finances from the Board of Governors and detailed budget presentations from Florida State University, the University of Central Florida, and the University of North Florida. The witnesses explained how university budgets are organized into fund categories such as education and general, contracts and grants, auxiliaries, local/designated funds, capital projects, and component units such as direct support organizations. They also described carry forward funds, the statutory reserve and spending-plan requirements, the PICO/HECO capital outlay process, and how universities use investment accounts, audits, and board oversight to manage restricted and unspent funds. The universities emphasized that most operating dollars are restricted to specific uses and that state support helps keep tuition low. Members asked about differences in funding levels among institutions, especially why FSU receives more funding than UCF despite lower enrollment. Officials said preeminence funding, performance funding, and special legislative appropriations explain much of the difference, and the Board of Governors noted that Florida now has four preeminent universities, with UCF nearing that status. Questions also focused on what happens to unspent carry forward money, how it is invested, and whether the Board of Governors or Legislature can require funds to be returned; officials said the money is invested conservatively, subject to board and audit oversight, and can roll forward under a detailed spending plan, though the Legislature can change funding levels. The committee also discussed capital projects, with members asking about delays, inflation, and whether more projects should be phased or funded faster; witnesses said PICO funds remain with the state until needed and are reimbursed as construction proceeds. A substantial portion of the discussion covered athletics, research, student fees, and endowments. The universities said athletics is generally expected to be self-supporting, though limited use of auxiliary or carry forward funds may be allowed for projects benefiting the broader student body. They also described the financial pressures from name, image, and likeness changes and new NCAA-related costs, and said institutions are planning for those changes now. On research, the universities explained sponsored research funding, indirect cost recovery, compliance obligations, and tech transfer, but did not provide specific commercialization revenue figures and said they would follow up. Members also asked about student fee increases, student input, counseling and wellness funding, and how housing costs affect affordability; the universities said student committees and boards review fees, and aid packaging is intended to keep student debt low. Endowments were described as being held in separate foundations/DSOs with independent investment committees and used mainly for scholarships, faculty support, and research.

Transcript Highlights:

• Also, this was a quick read, and could you tell me the difference between where I'm on page two and section
• You say you see that in section two, and then you see on section two, it talks about the removal of the
• It says the municipality, and the next One section is the county. OK, thank you, senator.
• In what ways and questions did you ask of them as far as them to be involved in this particular section

Bills: SB1265 , SB1198 , SB2046

Committee: Senate Local and County Government

Keywords: municipal ordinances, local government, ordinance publication, posting requirement, public notice, municipal law, city ordinances, town ordinances, county government, newspaper publication, effective date, Oklahoma statutes, 11 O.S. 14-106, ordinance notice, government oversight, healthcare authority, property lien, county treasury, Oklahoma, municipalities

Transcript Highlights:

• I am prepared to go over each section at this print hearing, or can forego that until we get to a full
• Chairman, I'm prepared to go over each section at this print hearing or can forego that until we have
• explain why this draft doesn't have the elimination of any rules, even though it's in that exact section
• I'm prepared to detail each of those sections for you now, but if it pleases the Chair, I'll forego that
• And as you're going through those numbers, start thinking of which category or which section of the budget

Summary: The House Health and Welfare Committee met, established a quorum, and approved the January 15, 2026 minutes without objection. The committee then introduced several RS drafts. RS 32847, from the Department of Health and Welfare, would codify background-check requirements for certain licenses and facility operators to satisfy FBI database requirements while preserving the department’s ability to update rules as criminal laws change. RS 32853 would merge the Board of Dentistry into the Board of Dentistry, and RS 32859 would merge the Board of Podiatry into the Board of Medicine; during discussion on RS 32859, a member questioned why the draft did not also eliminate rules, and the presenter said that could be addressed later if the merger advances. All three RSs were introduced by voice vote. The committee also introduced RS 32861, a controlled substances update presented by the Division of Occupational and Professional Licenses and the Board of Pharmacy. The bill would update Idaho’s Controlled Substances Act, allowing the legislature to review scheduling changes independently, and it includes additions for new Schedule I substances and opioids, along with cleanup changes such as correcting drafting errors, simplifying substance names, and removing obsolete references to board rules. The presenter said the edits would not affect enforcement. The committee voted to introduce the RS by voice vote. At the close of the meeting, the chair announced that the committee would hear the Health and Welfare budget the next day from the JFAC co-chair and budget analyst, and encouraged members to identify areas they wanted to review. The chair also noted that additional RS drafts might be brought forward later in the week. The meeting adjourned after welcoming visitors, including Scouts and attendees for Pharmacy Day at the Capitol.

Transcript Highlights:

• Tallahassee To the Honorable Members of the Florida Senate and House of Representatives: Whereas, Article 3 Section
• Whereas, Article 3 Section 3 of Florida...
• Governor of the State of Florida, by virtue of the power and authority vested in me by Article 3 Section
• Section 1: Legislature of the State of Florida convened in special session commencing at 9:00 A.M., Monday
• Section 2: The Legislature of the State of Florida is convened in special session for the sole and...

Keywords: 999, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• Section 13 of the bill, line 758 to 800, substantially rewords section 945.48 of the Florida Statutes
• Emergency is defined and described in this section.
• Sealing of criminal records, that entire section was removed.
• 7 and the disposition of conservation lands in Section 18.
• Would you please delete the section of your amendment? Mr.

Summary: The committee met and first reported favorably CS for SB 1782, which creates a new offense for dangerous excessive speeding, with support noted from the Orange County Sheriff’s Office and the Florida PBA. It also reported favorably CS for SB 306, which addresses Medicaid managed care provider network access by requiring after-hours and holiday appointment availability and a minimum level of primary care participation. CS for SB 716, imposing mandatory minimum sentences for certain sexual offenses committed by registered sex offenders or predators, and CS for SB 1084, expanding protections against non-consensual dissemination of intimate images and digitally forged intimate images, were also approved. The committee then approved CS for CS for SB 1604, a corrections package that would require prepayment of court costs for certain inmate lawsuits, shorten the limitations period for confinement-condition claims, allow consecutive sentencing in some cases, and revise mental health treatment procedures in correctional settings. Members discussed constitutional concerns and access-to-courts issues, but the bill was reported favorably. CS for CS for SB 1804, which creates a capital offense for trafficking a child 12 or younger or a mentally incapacitated person for sexual exploitation, drew extensive debate and opposition from the Florida Conference of Catholic Bishops, the Florida Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers, and Floridaans for Alternatives to the Death Penalty; despite objections about constitutionality and ethics, it was reported favorably. The committee also approved CS for SB 1838, expanding protections for court officials against tampering, harassment, and retaliation, and CS for CS for SB 890, the Emily Adkins Family Protection Act, which creates a statewide VTE registry and requires blood clot screening and training in hospitals and care facilities. Members and public witnesses spoke in strong support of the blood clot bill, including family members and survivors. Finally, the committee reported favorably CS for SB 1252, directing FDLE to study a statewide pawn data database, CS for SB 468, increasing penalties for fleeing or eluding law enforcement and allowing vehicle impoundment, CS for SB 490, expanding off-duty concealed carry eligibility for correctional officers and correctional probation officers, and CS for SB 572, the Pam Rock Act on dangerous dogs, which was amended to refine enclosure, confiscation, euthanasia, and insurance requirements.

Transcript Highlights:

• I move to suspend House Rule 5, Section 11 of the House Rules to entitle necessary staff... from the
• If you have any questions or comments, please post them in the comments section.
• Section four by let's count please bring your amendment down front.
• Substitute Senate Bill 1 under Rule 8 Section 4 of the House.
• Senate Bill 1 is finally passed subject to Article 3, Section 49A, Texas constitution. Mr.

Bills: SB1 , HB500 , SB1 , HB1400 , HB 1094 , HB365 , HB 1109 , HB647 , HB500

Keywords: appropriations, budget, state funding, education, healthcare, infrastructure, state budget, mental health funding, education funding, infrastructure improvements, public safety, groundwater, water conservation, financial assistance, Texas Water Development Board, innovation fund, local conservation districts, transportation protection agreement, funeral services, insurance exemption

Transcript Highlights:

• </c> buildings referred to in that section buildings referred to in that section Roman<01:17:31.520><
• </c> the end of that section has a through d. the end of that section has a through d.
• </c> you were talking about removing section you were talking about removing section C.<03:19:57.359>
• </c> because it says replace all of section because it says replace all of section one<03:20:01.439><
• The amendment says amend the bill by replacing section one. Section one contains A, B, and C. Okay.

Committee: House Criminal Justice and Public Safety

Keywords: 1189, house, all

Transcript Highlights:

• section section 7.<00:53:30.640><c> Section</c><00:53:31.119><c> seven</c><00:53:31.440><c> appropriates
• Section seven appropriates money, 7. Section seven appropriates money, right?
• That's what section 7 does. fund. That's what section 7 does.
• </c><01:32:44.239><c> 2</c> uh section Roman I'm sorry section 2 uh section Roman I'm sorry section 2
• </c> the DOT section of the paint. the DOT section of the paint.

Keywords: 928, house, all

Summary: The committee first took up House Bill 733, a third-party litigation financing reporting bill. Representative Cole explained that the bill shifts reporting from the Secretary of State to the courts, which he said removes the fiscal note and helps insurers obtain information for underwriting and premium-setting. The committee accepted the explanation and voted ought to pass; the roll call was 8-0 in favor, with one member taking a pause. The committee then heard House Bill 219, dealing with the renewable portfolio standard and the renewable energy fund. Representative Bose argued the bill would reduce electricity costs by lowering the REC purchase obligation from 220,000 to 170,000, which he said would reduce payments into the renewable energy fund by roughly $1 million to $2 million and save consumers only pennies a month. After questions about timing and whether to wait for a DOE report, the committee voted to retain the bill for further discussion rather than advance it; the motion to retain passed 5-4. House Bill 365 was then discussed as an election-related bill intended to help verify citizenship for voter registration and create a voucher process for people who cannot afford a birth certificate. The sponsor said the Secretary of State may be able to use federal and state databases to verify citizenship, and if not, indigent applicants could receive a voucher reimbursed by the state, with a $25,000 appropriation included. Members raised concerns about the Secretary of State’s access to databases and the bill’s timing and cost, and the committee decided to hold the bill until Secretary Scanlan could come testify. Finally, the committee heard House Bill 552, which updates retiree health coverage rules so dependent children can remain on the plan until age 26, consistent with the Affordable Care Act. DAS officials said retirees pay the full cost for dependents, about $1,000 per month, while the state covers only the retiree and spouse. The committee voted ought to pass unanimously, 9-0. The committee then began discussion of House Bill 572, a housing bill aimed at missing-middle housing, describing a voluntary program to identify developable public land, support construction, and streamline review, but the transcript cuts off before any action on that bill.

Transcript Highlights:

• made with the Senate author and with the broadband group is that we would put them in that second section
• It's going to generate a report that says, you know, these sections have a 90% likelihood or these sections
• A report that says, you know, these sections have a 90% likelihood or these sections have a less than
• That email has a rule impact statement that lists what the rule is, but it also lists those code sections

Bills: SB1280 , SB1316 , SB1433 , SB1455 , SB1456 , SB1457 , SB1459 , SB1461 , SB1463 , SB1465 , SB1466 , SB1721 , HJR1088

Committee: House Administrative Rules

Keywords: excise tax, oil tax, natural gas tax, state revenue, Oklahoma Corporation Commission, administrative rules, sunset provision, state agencies, regulatory review, legislative oversight, guidance transparency, administrative procedures, public inspection, state agency accountability, regulatory oversight, architects, landscape architects, interior designers, licensing, professional regulation

Summary: The committee first advanced Senate Bill 1721, which extends the sunset date for the Oklahoma Advisory Council on Indian Education and requires appointed members to represent a tribe or be involved in tribal education. It then passed Senate Bill 1433, a mirror bill requiring agencies to publicly post guidance documents and state that such documents do not have the force of law. Both bills were adopted without opposition and reported out favorably. The bulk of the meeting focused on Senate Bill 1316, which would create a rotating, eight-year review of administrative rules modeled on Idaho law. Members questioned whether the process would duplicate existing rule review, whether it would be used as a rubber stamp or to remove needed protections, and how AI tools might assist. The sponsor said the goal is to verify statutory authority, identify obsolete or duplicative rules, and use a limited AI system built from Oklahoma constitutional, statutory, and code materials only as a research aid, not a decision-maker. The committee then passed the bill unanimously. The committee also advanced a series of sunset-extension bills for various boards and agencies, including oil and gas tax apportionments, the Board of Governors of Architects, Landscape Architects, and Licensed Interior Designers, the Board of Tests for Alcohol and Drug Influence, the Construction Industries Board, the Oklahoma Abstractors Board, OETA, the Polygraph Examiners Board, the Board of Licensure for Professional Engineers and Surveyors, and the Advisory Committee on Midwifery. Most passed unanimously, though the Construction Industries Board bill passed 11-1, OETA passed 7-5, and the midwifery bill passed 10-2. The committee also approved H.J.R. 1088, which ratifies education agency rules, by an 11-1 vote. At the end, the chair outlined the committee’s remaining workload and said several bundled rule resolutions and a few major rules would be coming soon, including a large health-agency bundle. Members were asked to return rule assignments quickly so resolutions could be prepared before the end of session. The meeting adjourned after the chair said the next meeting would likely be brief and focused on one or two resolutions.

Transcript Highlights:

• Senate Bill 1430, amending Section 4.5th.
• You can win a IRS amending check in 401 by lost 2025 251 section 13, meaning section 403 1504 relating
• Senate Bill 1430, emitting section 4.5th.
• You can win a IRS amending check in 401 by lost 2025 251 section 13, meaning section 403 1504 relating

Keywords: 1182, all

Transcript Highlights:

• to note that this bill does apply to both children and vulnerable adults, to suit two different sections
• I'm looking at page 5, section 2, where it's talking about when a parent, guardian, or other custodian
• I'm on Section 54-1803. What are we defining here? Like, what definition should I be looking for?
• So the physician, as being defined by Section 54-1803, would be a physician that falls under the scope
• Chairman, I guess I'm kind of in the same section as Representative Egbert is because I'm thinking about

Committee: House Health and Welfare

Keywords: 989, all

Transcript Highlights:

• Just on the section that we signed up for, or as we're digging into budgets, if we have ideas on other
• inputs too, because there's going to be other members of this body that have looked at that other section
• So I appreciate getting all the input in any section of the budget.
• I appreciate getting all the input in any section of the budget.
• I appreciate getting all the input in any section of the budget.

Summary: The House Health and Welfare Committee convened with a quorum, approved the January 19 and January 20, 2026 minutes, and adjusted its agenda to account for absent members. The committee then introduced several RSs, including RS 3305 on cottage food operations, which would allow certain small-scale entrepreneurs to test refrigerated or frozen foods under a $5,000 threshold without full commercial-kitchen regulation. Members also introduced RS 32945, which would allow directed blood donation, and RS 32947, which would require providers to disclose cash and insurance prices for procedures and let patients choose the cash price while applying it toward deductibles. Committee members raised questions about how the pricing proposal would interact with payer-provider contracts and whether patients would have cash available, but the RS was still introduced. The committee also introduced RS 33015, updating Idaho law on epinephrine delivery systems so school-related self-administration or administration with parental permission would cover both EpiPens and newer single-dose nasal spray options. RS 32948, the oral parity proposal, was introduced after a brief numbering correction; it would address anti-cancer oral medications so patients are not required to pay the full deductible up front for pill forms when comparable IV treatments can be paid over time. Representative Bruce said the goal was to align coverage treatment between oral and intravenous cancer drugs. Finally, the committee heard RS 32915, which would repeal the Yellow Dot Program. Representative Scott said the program, created in 2020, is little used, costs the state money, and is outdated by newer technology and other ways to alert EMS to medical conditions. Members asked about the Senate’s prior inaction and the program’s cost, and the RS was introduced. The chair then shifted to committee business, noting that rules review would begin the next day and likely take several meetings, and asking members to submit budget recommendations by the beginning of the next week. The committee also discussed expectations for members to present RSs once they become bills, and the meeting adjourned without further action.

Transcript Highlights:

• details if you have questions about the program, but the bill would repeal a chapter, which is 10 sections
• Just on the section that we signed up for, or as we're digging into budgets, if we have ideas on other
• Just on the section that we signed up for, or as we're digging into budgets, if we have ideas on other
• inputs, too, because there's going to be other members of this body that have looked at that other section
• I appreciate getting all the input in any section of the budget.

Committee: House Health and Welfare

Keywords: 989, all