Transcript Highlights:

• <00:43:44.839> not One-Stop shop so the applicants not One-Stop shop so the applicants not
• <00:49:14.520> and decision on a specific application and decision on a specific application
• through the process with the applicant through the process with the applicant rather<01:16:47.360
• these V and even require the evaluate these V and even require the applicant<02:05:33.360> to
• c> the<02:06:59.000> site<02:06:59.280> evaluation impacts does the site evaluation

Keywords: 928, house, all

Summary: The committee heard a presentation from the Department of Environmental Services on proposed changes in House Bill 2 and related technical changes in House Bill 1 tied to the governor’s permitting realignment initiative. The proposal would move environmental review staff from Fish and Game and DNCR to DES to create a more centralized “one-stop shop” for applicants needing DES permits, especially for wildlife and natural heritage reviews. DES said the goal is to speed permitting, support a 60-day review clock, and improve coordination among agencies while keeping the substantive review work in place. Members asked about staffing impacts, the scope of the transferred duties, and whether the change would create redundancy or weaken the other agencies. DES said most of the affected staff work primarily on these reviews, though Fish and Game staff also handle other state and federal reviews, which is why the proposal was adjusted to keep one of the four Fish and Game positions there and move three to DES, along with two positions from DNCR. DES also described a new supervisory position in HB 2 to manage the transferred staff within its land resources bureau. Officials said the reviews would still be done by specialists, but under DES supervision, and that the agencies would continue to coordinate recommendations on species impacts and mitigation. The committee also discussed fee increases intended to offset costs, including a 50% increase in wetlands fees and a 100% increase in alteration-of-terrain fees, with the department saying the changes would cover the new positions. Members raised concerns about impacts on private homeowners, possible incentives to work without permits, and whether fines should be used more as a revenue source or for mitigation. DES said wetlands permits are roughly split between homeowner-related and commercial projects, that permit-by-notification already creates a two-tier structure for smaller projects, and that enforcement relies partly on public complaints and online permitting systems. The department also said most fines currently go to the general fund and vary widely year to year, with about $75,000 budgeted, and that the proposal would also create permit-by-notification authority for alteration-of-terrain projects between 100,000 and 150,000 square feet, mirroring language in Senate Bill 110. No vote or final committee action was taken in the portion provided.

Transcript Highlights:

• grant applications.
• These employee panelists review these and score applications based on.
• for evaluating and scoring applications solely on the commissioners.
• we have 12 applications.
• Meteorological meteorological evaluation towers are used to evaluate locations for future wind turbines

Transcript Highlights:

• Um this is evaluation committee.
• evaluation committee.
• at DES and then go file your site evaluation committee application and have your hearing at the site
• evaluation committee.
• hub of the site evaluation committee. hub of the site evaluation committee.

Keywords: 1191, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• team evaluates these things.
• The agency review team uses that application criteria, evaluates each of the projects, and recommends
• They can't submit the application, but they can complete it so that the actual applicant can come in
• It's 30 days for an application to be submitted.
• five applications that we are reviewing.

Transcript Highlights:

• application round.
• So an evaluation of that should also be included.
• Our program evaluators are here today to provide an update on the Child Care Services Program evaluation
• We currently have no pending applications.
• We have had 108 applications denied, with the primary denial reason being that applicants were not enrolled

Summary: The committee first heard an update on North Dakota’s Interagency Council on Homelessness and Continuum of Care funding. Jennifer Henderson of the North Dakota Housing Finance Agency reported that homelessness remains driven by tight housing markets, low incomes, rising rents, and barriers to rental assistance, public benefits, and disability determinations. She said the state’s one-time North Dakota Homeless Grant is serving all regions but reaches far fewer households than the former Rent Help program, and that aging homelessness, shelter staffing shortages, and limited affordable units are growing concerns. Members discussed the need for more housing supply, better coordination with Health and Human Services, landlord engagement, reentry housing, and possible continued one-time funding for the $10 million Homeless Grant and $25 million Housing Incentive Fund. Henderson also warned that federal Continuum of Care funding is uncertain, with HUD expected to issue a new notice June 1 and possible shifts away from permanent supportive housing toward transitional housing and other models. The committee then took testimony on accessibility of government services for people who are blind, visually impaired, deaf, or hard of hearing. Paul Olson of North Dakota Vision Services School for the Blind described the school’s services for infants, children, and adults, including screenings, mobility training, assistive technology, and outreach across the state. He said the agency works closely with Vocational Rehabilitation and is also involved in improving website and document accessibility, especially for PDF materials. Public testimony highlighted barriers such as inaccessible CAPTCHA systems, online forms, driver’s license requirements on job applications, and limited transportation in rural areas. A deaf resident urged broader use of video remote interpreting and video relay services, along with training so people know how to use them effectively. Finally, Kay Larson presented the final report on the child care provider licensing study. The report recommended streamlining North Dakota’s child care licensing structure into three provider types plus a preschool designation, while preserving health and safety standards and maintaining eligibility for child care assistance. The committee discussed simplifying training and qualification rules, revising ratio and group-size requirements, and adjusting age bands for infants and toddlers. The report also noted that some changes would require statutory amendments and later administrative rule changes, with a transition period likely extending through 2029. No formal votes were taken in the transcript, but the committee accepted the updates and scheduled follow-up presentations for a later meeting.

Transcript Highlights:

• to be evaluated here. to be evaluated here.
• permit applications.
• certificate application. certificate application.
• as wanting a site evaluation committee. as wanting a site evaluation committee.
• fully evaluate. fully evaluate.

Keywords: 1189, house, all

Transcript Highlights:

• It is the policy of the state of Minnesota to consider grant application applicants' past performance
• applicants past performance application applicants past performance before<00:15:43.680> awarding
• evaluation of deeds grants management. evaluation of deeds grants management.
• evaluation manager, Mariam Nada. evaluation manager, Mariam Nada.
• application stage.

Keywords: 1183, house

Transcript Highlights:

• eligibility of individuals. has a process that they can evaluate the has a process that they can evaluate
• evaluate those in a position to evaluate those documents<00:14:25.120> and<00:14:25.760> uh
• So, an applicant would submit that application.
• So in terms of that pre-application, the individual would submit that request, the NCA would evaluate
• So, we anticipate that most of the applications, if not all the applications we receive, will follow

Keywords: 1183, house

Transcript Highlights:

• As part of the application. TDLR learned that he was incarcerated.
• And in closing, I will say that in our sunset evaluation, self-evaluation report that we submitted, uh
• and useful for evaluating performance.
• MRIS applicants are unlike parole applicants, they often suffer from very serious and complex medical
• still incarcerated so that they can begin the application process.

Bills: HB153

Transcript Highlights:

• This application was created exclusively for us. We call that CMS.
• This application was created exclusively for us in VR by our IT department.
• They determine eligibility for applicants.
• So we'll start with application for services. Applicants for VR find VR in many different ways.
• And just to note, that is a lot of evaluation statewide that I look at.

Keywords: 977, all

Summary: The committee met to receive a detailed financial operations presentation from the South Carolina Vocational Rehabilitation (VR) agency, with staff walking members through funding sources, budgeting, accounts receivable, accounts payable, and grants management. Sabrina Walker explained VR’s blended funding structure, including federal grants, state appropriations, program income, and interagency contracts, and emphasized that state funds are essential to meeting the federal match and maintenance-of-effort requirements. Members asked repeatedly about transparency, audit controls, and the risk that state cuts could reduce federal drawdowns; staff responded that all reports reconcile back to the SCEIS accounting system, are subject to state audits and internal reviews, and that even modest state reductions could significantly reduce total available funding. The committee also discussed pre-employment transition services for students with disabilities, with staff confirming services are offered through school districts, charters, and private schools, and that contracts are monitored for performance and compliance. The presentation then shifted to budgeting and internal controls. Walker described a zero-based departmental budgeting process, monthly monitoring reports, contingency reserves for unexpected expenses, and a formal annual cycle that culminates in board approval. Members asked about facilities tracking, culture, and how the agency maintains accountability; staff said facilities staff inspect buildings and equipment, supervisors justify line-item requests, and the process has become smoother over time as departments learned the system. Cynthia Johnson followed with an accounts receivable overview, describing invoicing, receipting, aging, customer verification, year-end reporting, and the use of cross-training, shared email inboxes, and spreadsheets as checks and balances. She also explained work training center billing, interdepartmental transfers, and the revolving fund used to issue consumer checks more quickly than standard vendor payments. Olivia Perez presented accounts payable operations, including invoice processing through SCEIS and OnBase, the three-way match, travel reimbursements, revolving fund checks, State Treasury Office interactions, and handling of reversals, rejections, and levy notices. She reported that AP processed 67,723 SCEIS payments, 13,670 case management system invoices, 3,379 travel reimbursements, and 15,693 revolving fund checks in fiscal year 2025, with only 70 payment rejections. The final portion of the meeting covered Grants and Funds Management, where Walker explained federal reporting, drawdowns, payroll allocation, asset tracking, lease and IT contract reviews, cost allocation, and closing packages. She noted upcoming system changes such as S/4HANA, Workiva, and SC Pro, but said the agency is receiving training and feedback opportunities. No formal votes or legislative actions were taken during the presentation portion beyond approval of the prior minutes and a brief recess.

Transcript Highlights:

• so to support this effort applications so to support this effort the<00:15:15.920> branch<00:
• over the past two years, vendor support for several of these aging applications was discontinued due
• The need for forensic medical evaluations in criminal and civil commitment cases has really surged in
• The need for forensic medical evaluations in criminal and civil commitment cases has really surged in
• The need for forensic medical evaluations in criminal and civil commitment cases has really surged in

Keywords: 1183, house

Summary: The House Judiciary Finance and Civil Law Committee heard a presentation from State Court Administrator Jeff Shorba on the Minnesota judicial branch’s 2026-27 budget request. He outlined the courts’ structure and workload, noting 322 judges, about 2,800 staff, roughly 1 million district court cases annually, and a current budget of about $479 million. Shorba emphasized the courts’ constitutional role, the fact that court fines and fees are deposited into the general fund rather than retained by the branch, and recent legislative investments that helped reduce pandemic-era backlogs, improve technology, sustain treatment courts, and raise interpreter and examiner pay. The budget request focused on several areas: a 6% judicial salary increase to address recruitment and retention problems, including a 15% rise in turnover and a 27% drop in applicants since 2020; funding for health care and office lease cost increases; digital accessibility compliance work required by new federal ADA rules; a modernized justice partner access system for court records; higher pay for forensic psychological examiners, whose workload has risen sharply; increased juror compensation from $20 to $100 per day and mileage adjustments; and ongoing funding for interpreters, jury services, and cybersecurity. Shorba said the total request would be a 12% increase over the FY 2026-27 base budget. Members asked follow-up questions about funding for newly launched treatment courts and how those courts are financed after federal grants expire. Shorba said he would provide more detail later and noted the branch generally starts treatment courts with federal funding before seeking state support. Representative Ric also asked about labor negotiations, and Shorba explained that the judicial branch negotiates its own contracts rather than using the executive branch, with three unions involved and many unrepresented employees. No votes or formal actions were taken during the discussion.

Transcript Highlights:

• Each of our grant programs has an advisory and evaluation committee attached to it, so that applicants
• Each of our grant programs has an advisory and evaluation committee attached to it, so that applicant
• an evaluation committee attached to it so that applications and projects are assessed by groups of volunteers
• I don't think it was quite that level, but we definitely saw new applicants—applicants that we had not
• our grants and our applications.

Summary: The Capital Budget Committee heard presentations from the Department of Commerce, the Recreation and Conservation Office (RCO), and a consultant on the School Construction Assistance Program (SCAP) study. Commerce officials described their agency’s role in housing, energy, local government, broadband, and other capital programs, and reported on a $5 million pilot under Senate Bill 5200 that used trusted community messengers and technical assistance to help historically excluded organizations prepare for capital funding. They said 18 organizations received direct support and 79 smaller projects were also funded, but emphasized that statutory match rules, reimbursement-based payments, site-control requirements, insurance and audit costs, and extensive contracting rules remain major barriers. Commerce outlined efforts to expand outreach, digital modernization, internal contracting improvements, tribal MOUs, and innovation centers, and members asked about small business support, housing program placement, and outreach to Eastern Washington and communities of color. RCO described its grant programs for recreation, conservation, education, and salmon/orca recovery, and reviewed equity work done before and after a 2021-23 proviso. The agency had already created a small-communities carve-out in youth athletic facilities, piloted stipends for advisory committee members, and reduced match requirements where allowed. Under the proviso, RCO completed an equity review and a planning program that funded 54 projects across 34 counties, with many applicants being new or long-absent grantees. Staff said the review led to changes in scoring criteria, clearer application guidance, more objective data measures, expanded technical assistance, and targeted community engagement. Members asked about application burden, project sizes, outreach, and how the agency is broadening participation and representation on advisory committees. The final presentation summarized a planning study on SCAP, which examined rising construction costs, fragmented grant programs, local funding barriers, and uneven district capacity. The report recommended nine major changes, including stronger planning support, a new minor-modernization category, a mechanism to use unused funds more quickly, an education-specification prototype, a SCAP enhancement program for low-capacity districts, acceptance of non-SCAP funds, phased modernization, streamlined D-form and reimbursement processes, and revisions to the SCAP formula to better account for grade-band differences, enrollment projections, and regional cost factors. Additional recommendations included ongoing monitoring and evaluation, facilities-impact reviews, matching SCAP increases to construction-cost inflation, earlier locking of funding estimates, flexible program spaces, and updated statewide building-condition assessments. No votes were taken during the meeting.

Transcript Highlights:

• How can our approach be evaluated holistically?
• Patel, the number of applicants, the number of applications, and reporting is tied to the number of programs
• of this application and make it more simple.
• We had about 237,000 CSU applications passed, 228,000 UC applications passed, and so far 105,000 California
• We had about 237,000 CSU applications passed, 228,000 UC applications passed, and so far 105,000 California

Summary: The Assembly Budget Subcommittee on Education Finance heard an overview of the governor’s new Career Education Master Plan and related budget items. Labor Secretary Knox described the plan as an effort to reduce fragmentation across K-12, community colleges, workforce boards, and other systems by improving statewide and regional coordination, data sharing, skills-based hiring, career pathways, and wraparound supports such as child care, housing, food, and transportation. Members asked how success would be measured, how the plan would serve disconnected youth and adults, and whether the proposed data integration would rely on Cradle to Career; the secretary said it would. The Department of Finance said it was available to answer questions on the education side. The committee then reviewed existing CTE funding and oversight. The LAO, CDE, and Community Colleges Chancellor’s Office described the major ongoing programs, including CTIG, Perkins, K-12 Strong Workforce, and Community College Strong Workforce, and noted that many programs overlap in purpose and administration. Members repeatedly raised concerns about duplication, annual applications and reporting burdens, lack of clear outcome metrics, and whether funding incentives should be better aligned to regional collaboration. CDE and the Chancellor’s Office said they support alignment and dual enrollment, and Finance and CDE said LCFF/local match dollars are part of the funding structure. The committee also discussed child care as a barrier to participation and the need for better tracking of enrollment, completion, and job outcomes. On the consolidated application proposal, Finance proposed a study directing CDE to examine whether three long-standing CTE grant programs—Specialized Secondary Programs, CTIG, and California Partnership Academies—could be streamlined into a single application and reporting process. The LAO supported reducing administrative burden but noted that the largest programs, CTIG and K-12 Strong Workforce, were excluded from the proposal even though districts most often cite them as burdensome. CDE said it did not oppose the study but warned that statutory differences may limit consolidation. Members said the proposal should better address regional coordination, multi-year funding stability, and outcome measures rather than only simplifying paperwork. Finally, the committee heard a proposal for a $5 million ongoing California Education Interagency Council. GovOps said the council would provide a neutral venue for statewide coordination across education and workforce systems. The LAO opposed the proposal, arguing that existing bodies already provide coordination, the proposal does not change agency incentives, and the council would lack authority to implement decisions. Members expressed mixed views, with some supporting a coordinating body and others questioning whether it would differ from past efforts. No votes were taken during the portions summarized here, and the committee indicated it would hold some items open for further discussion.

Transcript Highlights:

• So, GIS accessibility application question data.
• So here are some numbers: self-evaluation completed, self-evaluation in progress, coordinated, not started
• applications.
• There was one new applicant this year also.
• Who participates in those decisions, and how artistic quality is evaluated, since the application relies

Keywords: Virginia Commission for the Arts Board Meeting, 976, house, all

Summary: The Virginia Commission for the Arts meeting opened with attendance, a welcome from Secretary of Education Dr. Jeffrey Smith, and approval of Commissioner Allison’s remote participation. Smith praised the commission’s role in supporting arts education and community life, and commissioners thanked him for the administration’s support. The commission then approved the March 2026 minutes, with Allison and Vanessa Thaxton Ward recused because they were absent from that meeting. Commission updates highlighted staff changes, including the arrival of communications and office specialist Tess Lidar, and several developments affecting arts organizations in Richmond, including the closure of Art 180 and the pause in operations at Swift Creek Mill Theater. Staff also reported strong communications growth, the upcoming return of Artworks in 2027, and progress on accessibility initiatives, including expanded grant application questions, an Open Door Arts cohort, site visits to area agencies on aging, and a forthcoming creative aging/futures grant opportunity. A separate report on the Small Town and Rural Arts pilot in Region 8 described in-person convenings, a digital toolkit, and lessons learned about place-based work, funding language, and the value of regional partners. The commission then approved FY27 grant recommendations across multiple programs: General Operating Support short form and long form panels, Operating Support for Small Arts Organizations, Creative Communities Partnership Grants, and Community Impact Grants. Commissioners who observed panels reported that the review process was organized, thoughtful, and increasingly focused on sustainability, accessibility, community engagement, and clear financial and strategic planning. Several recusals were noted, including Commissioner Armstrong on Opera on the James, Commissioner Grebeck on Prince Edward County, and others tied to specific organizations. The commission also approved the FY27 allocation budget, which uses state funds, NEA support, carryforward funds, one-time appropriations, and interest from the Arts Fund to increase grant support and launch new programs such as lifelong learning, accessibility microgrants, artist catalyst, and capacity-building grants. In additional actions, commissioners approved updates to the FY27 capacity building and lifelong learning grant guidelines, revised the teaching artist roster background check policy, and voted to repeal the existing VCA policy manual so staff can draft a new one aligned with agency and board responsibilities. Staff explained that the repeal would not leave the agency without coverage because state HR, procurement, and statutory grant-making requirements remain in place. The meeting then turned to a broader bylaws review led by the Attorney General’s office, prompted by the need to address a secretary vacancy and other governance gaps.

Transcript Highlights:

• We received 61 applications to build or expand residences. 61 applications to build or expand residences
• We've had this program evaluated by WestEd over a number of years.
• And so the applications come into the commission, And so the applications come into the commission, and
• The first CSAC evaluation is The first CSAC evaluation is in December of this year, so additional funding
• We paused applications on November 15 after we received over 9,200 applications for this current year

Summary: The Assembly Budget Subcommittee on Education Finance heard an extended discussion on state efforts to recruit, prepare, and retain teachers, with a focus on whether current programs are sustainable and well targeted. Testimony from the Learning Policy Institute, the Commission on Teacher Credentialing, the Department of Education, and the Legislative Analyst’s Office described persistent shortages, especially in special education, math, science, bilingual education, and high-need schools. Speakers emphasized that residency programs, Golden State Teacher Grants, National Board incentives, classified employee pathways, and undergraduate teacher pipelines have helped increase preparation and retention, but many of these efforts rely on one-time funding and lack long-term certainty. Committee members repeatedly raised concerns about the “leaky pipeline,” working conditions, the burden of student debt, and whether the state should simplify and institutionalize support for aspiring teachers rather than rely on a patchwork of grants. The agencies presented data showing continuing shortages and uneven distribution of fully credentialed teachers. CTC reported projected hiring needs of roughly 20,000 to 25,000 teachers annually, with the highest needs in self-contained classrooms, special education, and certain regions of the state. It also noted that emergency permits, waivers, and intern credentials remain high, and that teachers entering through those routes have higher turnover. LPI cited research showing residency-prepared teachers are more effective and more likely to stay, and argued that Golden State Teacher Grants attract candidates who might not otherwise enter teaching and help them complete preparation. CDE stressed that most new demand comes from attrition and urged support for multiple entry points, tuition assistance, and campus-based coursework. Several members also discussed the role of community college pathways, dual credentialing, and support for school leaders as part of retention. The LAO recommended rejecting the educator pipeline proposals under discussion, citing limited evidence of effectiveness and suggesting that any new spending should be more narrowly targeted to the highest-need schools and long-standing shortage subjects. The LAO also said that if the Legislature funds new programs this year, Proposition 98 would be preferable given the state’s fiscal condition. Committee members pushed back on the idea that declining enrollment or layoffs would solve shortages, noting that shortages and layoffs can coexist in different subject areas and regions. The discussion ended with agreement that staff would continue working with agencies on how to make teacher pipeline investments more consistent, coherent, and easier for candidates to navigate. The committee then turned to the Golden State Teacher Grant Program. Finance proposed $50 million in one-time General Fund support to extend the program for one additional year, while the LAO recommended rejecting the proposal because the first CSAC evaluation is not due until later in the year and because the funding would be non-Proposition 98. CSAC supported the extension, saying demand has been strong, over 20,000 aspiring educators have been served since 2021, and the agency had to pause applications after receiving more than 9,200 this year; it also said more than 2,500 candidates had already expressed interest for next year. Members asked how many students the new funding would serve, and CSAC estimated just under 5,000 awards at $10,000 each. The discussion also covered whether the grant could be moved into Proposition 98 and how the one-time nature of the funding affects confidence among prospective teachers.

Transcript Highlights:

• criteria and proposals are evaluated against that.
• We may not be able to evaluate every program, but how do we select which programs we're going to evaluate
• So I think the structure of how do we pick what we're going to evaluate.
• We may not be able to evaluate every program, but how do we select which programs we're going to evaluate
• But it seems like they're evaluating programs in that section.

Keywords: 908, all

Transcript Highlights:

• And evaluate the application to determine if the project and applicant are eligible.
• ...over by larger applicants.
• But most importantly, part of this is just how we're going to evaluate these applications and how we're
• So we're working on policies for how we're going to evaluate these applications and then developing some
• . applicants.

Transcript Highlights:

• Which provided a detailed evaluation of the currency best platform.
• But it's a deft ability of the application to meet ongoing comments.
• The APD will never end the day that they've implemented the application.
• applications through its lifespan.
• It's still their application.

Transcript Highlights:

• So the applicant submits the application.
• We opened up the application process June 1st, 2025.
• the applicants.
• We really evaluate projects on the merits.
• And so that we can really evaluate that.

Keywords: 996, all

Transcript Highlights:

• How can our approach be evaluated holistically?
• process rather than through separate application processes.
• This item is described as an evaluation, as research.
• How would this evaluation help implement that?
• We had about 237,000 CSU applications passed, 228,000 UC applications passed, and so far 105,000 California

Keywords: 988, house, all