Transcript Highlights:

• And I've had to apologize to our partner agencies for these delays for our shared clients.
• To be able to share and exchange information, right?
• One department can't share information with another department.
• make sure that they can share different information.
• We're also concerned about the state share of new IHSS hours being shifted to counties.

Summary: The joint informational hearing focused on the impact of H.R. 1 on older Californians and related county administration issues. Chair Jackson and Chair Addis opened by emphasizing California’s rapidly aging population and the need to protect seniors’ access to food, health care, housing, and in-home support services. Testimony from the Department of Social Services, Department of Health Care Services, and Department of Aging described how H.R. 1 would expand work and reporting requirements in CalFresh and Medi-Cal, increase redeterminations, and create new eligibility barriers. Witnesses and advocates warned that these changes could lead to large coverage losses, especially for adults ages 55 to 64, people experiencing homelessness, caregivers, and some immigrant groups, while also increasing administrative burden on counties. The LAO noted that many provisions do not directly apply to Californians 65 and older, but highlighted indirect effects and some direct impacts, including a new home equity limit for certain long-term care recipients and narrower immigration eligibility rules. Committee members pressed the administration and counties on how exemptions would be identified and implemented, whether data systems could automatically protect eligible people, and how outreach would reach older adults, women, LGBTQ seniors, and people with limited digital access. DHCS and CDSS said they are working to use existing data, cross-program information sharing, and human-centered communications to maximize exemptions and reduce churn, including text outreach, print and radio campaigns, and navigator support. Members also raised concerns about the need for legal aid and county eligibility workers to help people navigate complex rules, and requested updated analyses on the number of people likely to lose both Medi-Cal and CalFresh and the broader human and system impacts. No votes were taken. The second major topic was the administration’s proposal to shift some future IHSS costs to counties by establishing a statewide baseline for average authorized hours per case. CDSS said the proposal is intended to improve consistency in assessments and not reduce services, while counties and labor groups strongly opposed it, arguing that rising hours reflect real increases in need, an aging and higher-acuity caseload, and state-mandated assessment tools rather than county error. County representatives said the proposal would strain already limited local revenues, worsen the effects of H.R. 1, and could force cuts to other safety-net services. Committee members questioned the proposal’s timing and impact, but the hearing ended without action, with the chairs asking for continued updates, additional analysis, and more information before May Revision.

Transcript Highlights:

• I've shared a number of slides. I won't go through all of them.
• see all of the detail there, which I can share later.
• Like we all share in that.
• This is the idea that some providers have a disproportionate share or large share of patients on Medicare
• We would be happy to share that and send it over. Okay. Thank you.

Keywords: 1184, house, all

Transcript Highlights:

• We all have some sort of network within our community that people listen to us, and when we share out
• We all have some sort of network within our community that people listen to us, and when we share out
• We all have some sort of network within our community that people listen to us, and when we share out
• We all have some sort of network within our community that people listen to us, and when we share out
• </c><00:53:50.799><c> lots</c> know representative Curran shared lots know representative Curran shared

Keywords: 1183, house

Transcript Highlights:

• that as we have um those to share that as we have um those particular<00:22:53.760><c> pieces</c><00
• But I thank you for your thoughtful testimony today and for sharing that information.
• All of us share a daily mission to prevent, intervene, and treat violence in our communities.
• </c> Senator wesland thank you for sharing Senator wesland thank you for sharing with<01:18:36.960><c
• </c> thank you Senator weslin um for sharing thank you Senator weslin um for sharing your<01:18:58.639

Keywords: 1187, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• retirement income comes from our public retirement systems, do not have... ...share of their retirement
• I actually share a lot of what you sent to us with my constituents who are retired, and they appreciate
• I would like to share a personal story about why I think this bill should be passed.
• I would like to share a personal story about why I think this bill should be passed.
• In closing, I want to share that I recently lost In closing, I want to share that I recently lost my

Keywords: 995, all

Summary: The committee heard testimony on a range of public retirement and municipal health insurance bills. Mass Retirees and the American Federation of Teachers supported House 2890/Senate 1848 on transparency in municipal health insurance, arguing that broker and consultant roles should be clearly defined, commissions disclosed, and dual roles prohibited to reduce conflicts of interest and costs. They also supported House 2799/Senate 1848 on protecting municipal retirees from future premium contribution increases, House 2854 on voting rights for surviving spouses in retirement board elections, and Senate 1917 on updating the definition of veteran for retirement purposes. Committee members discussed whether the veteran definition should simply conform to the federal definition going forward. Educators testified in support of House 2769/Senate 1921, which would allow teachers with at least 20 years of service to buy back creditable service for periods when they worked part-time while raising children. Multiple teachers described the financial and retirement penalties they experienced after stepping down to part-time work for child care, calling the current system inequitable and a “mom tax.” Sponsors and supporters said the bill is intended to correct that disparity and help retain teachers, while one committee member noted it appeared neutral on an actuarial basis. The committee also heard strong support for Senate 1908, which would raise the cap on outside income for public pension recipients, from retired State Police troopers who said the current limit is outdated and unfair to those forced into disability retirement after line-of-duty injuries. Another State Police representative supported House 2910 on state police pensions, citing recruitment and retention problems under current pension rules. In contrast, Hampden County Regional Retirement System officials and the Massachusetts Association of Contributory Retirement Systems opposed House 2745, a bill to restructure the Hampden County system’s governance, arguing it would weaken PERAC oversight and create an unworkable local system. They instead supported House 2813, which would extend the time to fill a vacant fifth member seat on retirement boards. At the end of the hearing, the committee voted to adjourn the hearing.

Transcript Highlights:

• It provides that any amendment to a required time share plan registration shall be deemed approved by
• </c><00:28:32.880><c> provides</c> registration of time shares provides registration of time shares provides
• plan registration shall be deemed share plan registration shall be deemed approved<00:28:51.840><c>
• We have House Bill 1946 relating to registration of time shares.
• </c> relating to registration of time shares. relating to registration of time shares.

Bills: SB2278, SB2908, SB2987

Keywords: light pollution, outdoor lighting, fully shielded, Hawaii Revised Statutes, environmental protection, night sky, lighting fixtures, local control, exemptions, athletic facilities, wildlife conservation, Hawaiian culture, 910, house, all

Summary: The House Committees on Tourism and Economic Development and Technology heard several measures on February 12, 2026. HB 1950 would dedicate 15% of transit accommodations tax revenue to a new state-led marketing and branding special fund and require an annual tourism management plan. HTA and DBEDT supported the bill as providing predictable funding for marketing and tourism management, while the Tax Foundation of Hawaii opposed the special fund structure as limiting legislative flexibility. Members discussed the size of the allocation and whether a tourism emergency fund would still be needed; the bill later advanced with amendments that removed some provisions and blanked out the 15% figure for further discussion, and it passed with amendments. HB 2268 would add film production marketing and promotion to HTA’s powers. The governor’s office, HTA, the Hawaii Film Alliance, and several industry groups supported the measure, arguing that film and TV exposure drives tourism and generates significant spending and tax revenue, while one individual testified in opposition. In questions, HTA said it would use existing staff and did not have a separate cost estimate. The committee amended the bill to specify that film productions are primarily filmed in Hawaii and deferred the date to continue discussion; it then passed with amendments. The committee also heard HB 2156, which would raise filing thresholds for general excise tax and transit accommodations tax filers. The Department of Taxation said the change could increase administrative burden if more filers shift from mandatory electronic filing to paper filing, while the Tax Foundation noted the filing threshold issue is separate from e-filing requirements. The bill was moved forward with a deferred date. HB 1946, concerning time-share registration renewals and amendments, drew support from ARDA and other industry testimony, with no opposition noted; DCCA was said to be in talks with the industry. It was also advanced with technical amendments and a deferred date.

Transcript Highlights:

• Senate Bill 382 does the following: creates a provision that riders must yield to pedestrians on a shared
• Sidewalks and crossings are shared spaces, and right now the rules haven't caught up with how fast and
• Chair, I have to say, not only do you and I share the same hairstyle, we also share the same mind.
• I share your sentiment with these cameras as well. The answer to that is no.
• and limited sharing of video surveillance.

Bills: S0382, S0628, S0654, S0696, S0880

Keywords: transportation facility designations, road naming, highway designation, honorary designation, memorial highway, memorial boulevard, memorial interchange, airport naming, FDOT markers, Florida Department of Transportation, State Road 80, SR 80, U.S. 90, U.S. 41, A1A, Turnpike interchange, Kissimmee Park Road, Bobby Bowden, Donald Trump Highway, President Donald J. Trump Highway

Transcript Highlights:

• Thank you all for being here both in person and virtually to share your thoughts on the legislation before
• And of course, if you do have longer thoughts to share, once again, we welcome the submission of written
• This law establishes that the residential class has to pay the lowest percentage share of the tax levy
• I'd like to ask the council president to share some thoughts on this, and as I noted before, our city
• It is a place where people look out for one another and take pride in sharing what we have.

Bills: H3012, H4008, H4435, H4444, H4526, H4547, H4574, H4575, H4576, H4577, H4585, H4605, H4687, H4703, H4722, H4754, H4755

Keywords: fines, property valuation, commercial property, real estate, tax penalties, property taxes, local option tax, marijuana sales, Salem, revenue generation, taxation, recreation, local government, commercial activities, Charlemont, property exemption, disabled persons, Swampscott, senior exemption, property tax

Transcript Highlights:

• IF YOU WANT TO HOLD YOUR QUESTIONS AS WELL I WILL INVITE STEP UP TO COME UP IF THEY WOULD LIKE TO SHARE
• BUT AT THIS TIME I WANT TO INVITE A REPRESENTATIVE FROM STEP UP TO COME UP IF THEY WANT TO SHARE ANYTHING
• BUT CAN YOU SHARE WITH US WHERE WE ARE TODAY AS WE SIT ON FES UA STUDENT ACCOUNTS ARE THERE ANY FES UA
• WE HAVE SHARED THAT NO MONEY CAN GO INTO AN ACCOUNT THAT HAS IN EXCESS OF $50,000.
• I WANTED TO SAY THAT AND SHARE THAT.

Transcript Highlights:

• Minnesotans are rightly concerned, and they came and they shared that with us in numbers of five and
• Minnesotans are rightly concerned, and they came and they shared that with us in numbers of five and
• Minnesotans are rightly concerned, and they came and they shared that with us in numbers of five and
• Minnesotans are rightly concerned, and they came and they shared that with us in numbers of five and
• I am really happy to share that talking?

Keywords: 1183, house

Transcript Highlights:

• It clarifies which jurisdiction can share building officials via interagency agreements.
• So I'm just a little confused with the sharing of the information.
• They do share information with the restaurant, and there's a connection there.
• That information is shared. They know when that table is filled. They know who that individual is.
• They share information. Question. Okay. I understand the problem and the issue.

Summary: The Committee on Regulated Industries met with a quorum and heard several bills, with SB 1742 on condos temporarily postponed. SB 1298 on building construction was reported favorably after sponsor testimony about continuing education for building professionals, rural sharing of building officials, residential inspector limits, a planning examiner internship, permitting modernization, and contractor transition liability. SB 638 on home inspectors was also reported favorably after discussion of increasing required education from 120 to 200 hours, adding subject-specific exam and course requirements, and requiring $300,000 in errors and omissions insurance. SB 960 on elevator accessibility requirements was reported favorably, allowing additional shorter support rails in elevators while keeping the existing 42-inch rail requirement. The committee also unanimously recommended confirmation of a block of board and commission appointees. The committee adopted amendments and reported favorably CS/SB 940 on third-party restaurant reservation platforms, aimed at stopping bots and unauthorized resale of restaurant reservations; the Florida Restaurant and Lodging Association and Booking Holdings supported the bill, and members discussed how the measure would preserve direct restaurant-platform relationships like OpenTable and Resy while targeting third-party marketplaces that resell reservations. CS/SB 196 on foods containing vaccines or vaccine materials was reported favorably after amendments that defined mRNA vaccine use and added a cosmetics-related amendment addressing harmful chemicals such as PFAS, phthalates, formaldehyde-releasing agents, and mercury compounds; the Florida Retail Federation raised concerns but said it was working with the sponsor. CS/SB 1418 on heated tobacco products was reported favorably after an amendment clarifying the definition of heated tobacco products and excluding hookah, with support from the Florida Retail Federation and comments that the bill would distinguish these products from cigarettes for tax purposes. The committee also adopted a strike-all amendment and reported favorably CS/SB 1262 on construction contracting, which adds consumer protection and financial literacy topics to contractor continuing education, increases penalties for unlicensed contracting, creates a standardized disciplinary reporting system, and requires timely refunds and project completion standards; the Florida Home Builders Association supported the measure. Finally, CS/SB 1304 on solar facilities was reported favorably after extensive testimony from county commissioners and local officials supporting greater local oversight and decommissioning requirements for utility-scale solar on agricultural land; the bill would remove the current statewide by-right treatment for solar on agricultural land and authorize counties to adopt decommissioning ordinances. The meeting ended with members recording additional affirmative votes on selected bills and adjourning.

Transcript Highlights:

• Hi, I'm Penny King, and I am Harbor Cove's youth specialist, and I would like to share a story that didn't
• Monroy, the only Latino teacher I would have in my K-12 career, shared drawings of Mexico and portraits
• Monroy, the only Latino teacher I would have in my K-12 career, shared drawings of Mexico and portraits
• This strengthens empathy, community, and shared American values.
• I can share with you that our national research shows that a PEDA inclusive curricula boosts attendance

Keywords: 995, all

Summary: The Joint Committee on Education heard testimony on a wide range of bills, with the largest portions focused on the Healthy Youth Act (S.340/H.656), comprehensive and inclusive curriculum bills (H.655/S.371 and related measures), climate literacy education (H.560/S.391), computer science coursework (H.534/S.362), arts education funding and STEM-to-STEAM proposals (H.561 and H.4297), and a homeschooling reporting bill (H.518). Supporters of the Healthy Youth Act argued it would preserve local control while requiring medically accurate, age-appropriate, LGBTQ-inclusive sex education and regular updates to state health frameworks; opponents raised parental rights, age-appropriateness, and opt-out concerns, with some calling for fetal development content. Supporters of inclusive curriculum bills said they would improve representation, belonging, and civic understanding, while opponents argued they could undermine parental authority or promote ideological content. Climate, computer science, and arts advocates emphasized workforce readiness, student engagement, and the need for state support and funding to expand access and teacher training. Testimony on the climate literacy bill described increasing climate impacts in Massachusetts and argued that interdisciplinary instruction would prepare students for science, policy, and green careers; witnesses said the bill was not a mandate but a support and funding measure. Computer science supporters said access remains uneven, especially for girls, students of color, and students with disabilities, and urged stronger statewide requirements and AI-related standards. Arts advocates backed both the STEM-to-STEAM bill and the Lowell Mason arts funding proposal, citing research on student achievement, attendance, creativity, and the economic importance of the arts sector. The homeschool bill was supported by a homeschool advocacy group as a modernization of reporting requirements. The committee closed testimony on numerous bills where no one remained signed up or testimony had concluded, including several education, curriculum, and commission proposals. No votes were taken during the hearing itself. At the end of the session, the committee closed out the remaining testimony and adjourned after a motion and second.

Transcript Highlights:

• We have card services this morning enabled, and we have shared a card services link with attendees and
• are traveling throughout the Commonwealth to be in the places where we can meet people for them to share
• A memo has sent out outreach materials and would be grateful if you could share them with your networks
• And there's job-sharing issues. There's all kinds of things like that, right, to think about it.
• And I wanted to share with you, like all of you, I wear a lot of hats.

Keywords: 995, all

Summary: The Massachusetts Commission on the Status of Persons with Disabilities held its quarterly virtual/in-person meeting and approved the December minutes. The chair announced plans for the next “Meeting the Moment” community forum in Lowell on March 27, in partnership with MassAbility, focused on digital accessibility, education-to-employment transition, workforce supports, long-term services and supports, and health equity, along with a resource fair. The commission also began planning for its October National Disability Employment Awareness Month event and sought volunteers for a small planning group. The meeting featured an update from the Attorney General’s office on federal litigation affecting Massachusetts, including challenges to federal actions on higher education diversity data collection and DEI-related funding conditions, immigration/TPS for Haitians, NIH research grant disruptions, and the nonrenewal of mental health services grants for schools. The presenter said the state has helped protect more than $3 billion in federal funding and noted ongoing or pending appeals in several cases. Commissioners asked about possible impacts on disability-related DEI work and Medicaid; the AG’s office said guidance on DEIA/employment initiatives is available and that the state is closely monitoring federal Medicaid communications and coordinating with the governor’s office. Undersecretary of Labor Josh Cutler and apprenticeship liaison Amara Riemann presented on registered apprenticeship and pre-apprenticeship programs, emphasizing paid, employer-driven pathways with classroom instruction and wage progression. They highlighted growth in nontraditional fields such as human services, IT, early education, biotech, and banking, and described Bridgewater State University’s Excel program for neurodivergent people and people with disabilities as a model that can lead from pre-apprenticeship to apprenticeship. Commissioners discussed expanding similar models through community colleges and disability-focused workforce pipelines. Subcommittee reports covered disability employment, long-term services and supports, and health equity. The employment subcommittee heard from CED on state disability employment initiatives and planned future presentations from the Lawrence Partnership for Transition to Employment and Veterans Affairs. The long-term services and supports subcommittee discussed MassHealth budget pressures, anticipated federal Medicaid changes, the personal care attendant working group, and an upcoming discussion on crisis standards of care. In commissioner announcements, members highlighted recent honors for several commissioners, updates on municipal digital accessibility grants, a June Medicaid summit, and other commission activities. No formal votes were taken beyond approval of the minutes.

Transcript Highlights:

• Are you guys able to share your screens?
• Yeah, I think if I stop sharing my screen, you should be invited to do so. Okay.
• Just quickly, I think there was, I just thought it would be helpful to share.
• So we all share best practices. We get training from LeadingAge.
• But thank you to everybody for sharing those thoughts.

Keywords: 995, all

Summary: The Joint Committee on Aging and Independence commission meeting focused on continuing care retirement communities (CCRCs), with members and presenters discussing how the model works, consumer protections, and areas for future review. After member introductions, Jennifer Fuller summarized survey results showing the top priorities as financial viability and affordability, consumer protections and rights, and regulation/monitoring standards. The commission said those issues would guide its work plan, while also keeping staffing, definitions, and federal support on the radar. Alyssa Sherman of LeadingAge Massachusetts and Jim Freiling of Brookhaven at Lexington gave a detailed overview of CCRCs, explaining that they combine housing with health-related services under long-term contracts and typically require entrance fees plus monthly fees. They described the three common contract types: Type A/life care, where costs stay relatively stable if residents need more care; Type B, which offers some included or discounted care with higher costs later; and Type C, fee-for-service, with lower entrance fees but higher costs if care needs increase. They also discussed nonprofit governance, resident involvement, and the role of state and Attorney General disclosure requirements. Several members raised concerns about affordability, refund timing, and the need to distinguish true CCRCs from other senior housing marketed similarly; presenters said refunds are often tied to reoccupancy and that their organizations are collecting data on refund timelines and contract terms. The discussion also covered resident rights and governance, including whether residents should have seats on nonprofit boards. Christine Griffin said her community lacks resident board representation and urged the commission to consider a state requirement, while others said resident associations and direct engagement with boards can be more effective than mandatory board seats. Members also discussed transparency around monthly fee increases, financial screening before admission, and the importance of clear marketing so consumers understand what they are buying. No votes were taken. The meeting ended with logistical updates, including a tentative public hearing date of June 3, 2025, a note that the next meeting would focus on regulation and monitoring standards, and a reminder that the commission would continue refining its work plan based on survey feedback.

Transcript Highlights:

• One comment shared, we have to be taught the disturbing parts of our history and pass it on so it is
• And the things that I wanted to convey when I shared her story were that she had an incredible life in
• Black Americans and Jewish Americans share a history that runs deep.
• As members of Asian Pacific Islander communities, we recognize our shared responsibility to stand in
• Our histories are connected and shared commitment to standing against hatred, prejudice, and injustice

Summary: The Assembly convened without a quorum, then quorum was established and the chamber proceeded with prayer, the Pledge of Allegiance, journal approval, and a series of procedural motions. Members approved multiple unanimous-consent requests to suspend rules, re-refer bills to committees, and allow committees to notice bills pending re-referral. The day also included several guest introductions recognizing student leaders, public power executive Randy Howard, a family member of Assemblymember Gallagher, higher education leaders, Leadership Torrance, and the Vacaville PAL program. On the floor, the Assembly adopted several resolutions and heard extensive remarks in support of them. ACR 160, proclaiming April 2026 as Parkinson’s Disease Awareness Month, was adopted by voice vote after co-authors were added. H.R. 98, designating California Holocaust Memorial Day, received broad bipartisan support and was adopted after 76 co-authors were added. H.R. 100, recognizing Vaisakhi, also passed by voice vote after 73 co-authors were added, with members highlighting Sikh history, service, and cultural contributions. The Assembly then took up several bills on the third-reading file. AB 1977, relating to online notarization and notaries public, passed 69-5. AB 1987, which would direct wildlife-area fees back to operation and maintenance of state wildlife areas, passed 69-0. Other items on the second- and third-reading files were passed and retained, continued, or placed on the consent calendar as noted by the presiding officer. The session concluded with adjournment-in-memory tributes for La Mesa Police Officer Lauren Craven, community organizer Cynthia Brantley Pierce, coach John Beam, and Ralph Cavallo. The Assembly then adjourned until Thursday, April 16, at 9 a.m.

Transcript Highlights:

• Would you like to share about your bill? Yes, good morning. Thank you so very much.
• I'm going to share a story with you about a recently graduated music therapist in Washington State.
• They are shared to the residents.
• Let me start by sharing what this bill means in real terms.
• And Jacob, welcome back, if you'd like to share a briefing with us. Yes.

Bills: HB2540, HB2113

Keywords: emergency medical services, EMT recertification, healthcare, first responders, public health, radiologic technologists, diagnostic imaging, healthcare regulation, professional supervision, state licensing, 904, all

Transcript Highlights:

• And I think Idaho and Montana share many of the same characteristics.
• those actions to address those findings are corrected by the timeline that we've established and shared
• And I think, you know, that's a shared value for the rest of my leadership team.
• And I think, you know, that's a shared value for the rest of my leadership team.
• And I think, you know, that's a shared value for the rest of my leadership team.

Keywords: 989, all

Summary: The Senate Health and Welfare Committee approved the January 26 and January 27, 2026 minutes, then held a confirmation hearing for Juliet Sharon as director of the Idaho Department of Health and Welfare. Sharon outlined her background in Medicaid and health policy and described priorities including program integrity, tighter fiscal oversight, improved customer service, child welfare, disability services, and efforts to resolve long-running lawsuits. Senators asked about measurable goals, audit findings, collaboration with the disability community, and the department’s role in broader health care policy; Sharon said she expects to more than double program-integrity recoveries, that audit findings have corrective action plans but no terminations, and that the department can influence national policy by setting strong examples in Idaho. The committee then moved into the department’s Medicaid budget presentation. Sharon and Deputy Director/State Medicaid Director Sasha O’Connell explained a $107.2 million supplemental request for FY 2026 driven by caseload growth, especially in traditional Medicaid, adult disability services, and behavioral health, along with federally required rate and system changes. They also reviewed the FY 2027 request, including funding for the MMIS procurement, estate recovery contractor support, additional procurement staff, and forecast adjustments for caseload, pharmaceuticals, mandatory pricing, utilization, and provider rate changes. The department said the earlier 4% provider rate reduction and behavioral health service cuts were already producing savings, but another roughly $22 million in general funds would still be needed to balance the budget, requiring legislative direction on possible options. Senators raised concerns about the impact of rate reductions on access, especially for small home- and community-based providers, and about how audit findings and system failures were being addressed. O’Connell said the department received the most public comments it has ever seen, held some very small providers harmless, and is building access-monitoring reports and cost surveys to better track service availability. The committee also discussed a planned Medicaid pharmacy copay under House Bill 345, with the department saying it intends to implement the maximum allowable amounts. The meeting ended after Sharon answered questions about Medicaid expansion caseload trends, estate recovery, and the department’s efforts to keep the program sustainable, and the chair adjourned the committee with plans to meet again the next day.

Transcript Highlights:

• And I think Idaho and Montana share many of the same characteristics: many rural communities, communities
• And I think, you know, that's a shared value for the rest of my leadership team.
• And I think, you know, that's a shared value for the rest of my leadership team.
• And I think, you know, that's a shared value for the rest of my leadership team.
• And I think, you know, that's a shared value for the rest of my leadership team.

Summary: The Senate Health and Welfare Committee approved the January 26 and January 27, 2026 minutes, then took up the gubernatorial appointment of Juliet Sharon as director of the Idaho Department of Health and Welfare. Sharon described her background in public health and Medicaid administration in Arizona, Texas, and Idaho, and outlined her priorities if confirmed: program integrity, efficient operations, clearer outcome measures, child welfare, disability services, and resolving long-running class action lawsuits. Senators asked about measurable goals, balancing compassion with fiscal responsibility, audit findings, and collaboration with the disability community. Sharon said she expects to more than double program integrity recoveries, that audit findings are being addressed through corrective action plans rather than firings, and that disability collaboration should be embedded in daily operations. Committee members also discussed Idaho’s influence on federal policy and Medicaid administration. No vote on the appointment was taken in the portion provided. The committee then heard a lengthy Medicaid budget presentation focused on the Department’s supplemental request for state fiscal year 2026 and line-item requests for 2027. Sharon and Deputy Director/State Medicaid Director Sasha O’Connell explained that the supplemental request was driven by caseload growth, especially in traditional Medicaid, adult disability services, and youth/adult behavioral health, along with federally required rate and system changes. They also reviewed the impact of the governor-directed 4% provider rate reduction and the ending of some adult behavioral health services, saying the department had already been tracking budget sustainability before the executive order. O’Connell said the rate cuts drew the most public comment the agency has ever received, especially from home- and community-based providers, and that access monitoring is being developed to track whether services remain available. For 2027, the department requested funding for MMIS procurement, estate recovery, additional procurement staff, Medicaid admin reductions, and population forecast adjustments. Sharon said the MMIS modernization is on pause because of litigation over a major contract award, but other modules are moving forward. She also said estate recovery is underperforming and could bring in more general funds with contractor support. The committee discussed pharmacy costs and a possible Medicaid copay under House Bill 345, with Sharon saying implementation is underway and O’Connell noting savings estimates are still being developed. Senators also asked about expansion Medicaid growth and whether it affects other eligibility groups; Sharon said expansion growth is leveling off and that recovery rules apply to any Medicaid member receiving long-term care services. The meeting ended without any budget votes in the excerpt provided.

Transcript Highlights:

• The 40% share goes to higher education institutions for career services, quantum computing education,
• If I can share the infrastructure of a grid with more and more people and more and more users, then my
• If I can share the infrastructure, Because grids have these incredible economies of scale.
• If I can share the infrastructure of a grid with more and more people and more and more users, then my
• of costs. there's also a risk that Large loads to commit to paying their fair share of costs.

Summary: The committee first met in executive session on Senate Bill 5941, which would exempt certain school districts from a Washington State Energy Code requirement for onsite renewable energy systems on large new commercial buildings or additions. The committee adopted Senator Short’s amendment narrowing the eligible school district definition from 1,000 or fewer students to 500 or fewer students, then approved the bill as amended and sent it to the Rules Committee with a do pass recommendation. The committee then held a public hearing on Senate Bill 6171, a proposed substitute addressing emerging large energy use facilities, primarily data centers. Staff explained that the bill would require utilities serving such facilities to adopt tariffs or policies to protect other ratepayers, require long-term contracts and full cost recovery, allow curtailment during emergencies, add reporting and sustainability requirements, create a fee to fund energy assistance, weatherization, and higher education programs, and impose new clean energy and labor-related requirements. The prime sponsor said the bill is intended to protect affordability, reliability, transparency, and the public interest as data center demand grows. Testimony was mixed. Supporters, including community action groups, environmental organizations, some utilities, Ecology, and student representatives, argued the bill would prevent cost shifting, improve transparency, support low-income energy assistance, and help manage grid and climate impacts. Opponents, including data center representatives, public utility district and business groups, and some local government and port officials, said the bill was too prescriptive, could raise costs, threaten competitiveness, duplicate existing utility practices, and interfere with existing CCA/CETA provisions and local flexibility. No vote was taken on SB 6171 during the hearing, and the meeting adjourned after public testimony.

Transcript Highlights:

• We appreciate the committee's attention to children's online safety, a priority we share.
• Everyone does share the same goal, making the internet safer for kids, but that goal cannot be achieved
• And again, I think the record and the information that I've shared with the committee on the cases, you
• My name is Max Martin with the Association of Washington Business, and I'm here to share the industry's
• Thank you for the opportunity to share our thoughts today. Thank you for your testimony.

Bills: SB5928

Keywords: wildfire risk, disclosure, safety, environmental policy, risk assessment, 904, all