Transcript Highlights:

• President and Senator, are there any restrictions with respect to the length of maturity time on these
• President and Senator, the question was: Is there any restriction with respect to maturity?
• Restriction with respect to maturity levels in this bonding package?
• There is no restriction on maturity levels or timelines inside the bill.
• Senate Bill 131, introduced by Senator Mayes, is an act relating to property, eliminating restrictions

Keywords: 996, all

Transcript Highlights:

• the North Point Training Center to address the tuckpoint and masonry on the dorms, as well as the restricted
• the North Point Training Center to address the tuckpoint and masonry on the dorms, as well as the restricted
• This is housing the general population inmates that are currently there, along with the restrictive housing
• <00:18:27.120><c> along</c><00:18:27.440><c> with</c><00:18:27.679><c> the</c><00:18:28.000><c> restrictive
• </c><00:18:28.480><c> housing</c> there along with the restrictive housing there along with the restrictive

Keywords: Opening and Roll Call 00:28 Public safety Cabinet 01:09 Juvenile justice MH Facility: 04:30 Department of Corrections Repair and Replacement: 10:29 Department of Criminal Justice Flat Track 19:05 KSP : 27:02 Department of Public Advocacy : 37:35, 958, all

Summary: The subcommittee heard capital project requests from the Justice and Public Safety Cabinet for fiscal years 2026-28. The cabinet described its large statewide footprint and said its facilities face significant deferred maintenance, with the governor’s budget proposing full funding for maintenance pool requests, including an additional $60 million for the Department of Corrections’ maintenance pool and cash funding through investment income. Officials said the projects were based on facility assessments and were presented as necessary public safety investments rather than wish-list items. For the Department of Juvenile Justice, the main requests were $35 million for a high-acuity mental health treatment facility and $45 million each for two new female detention facilities. Officials said the mental health facility would fill a gap for youth needing psychiatric care, while the female facilities were needed to support a regional detention model and address overcrowding; they noted the current female population has grown by 50% since July 2024. Members asked about locations, and staff said they were considering western Kentucky abandoned mine land and available land in Fayette and Jefferson counties, with current female placements in Boyd County and Warren County. For the Department of Corrections, officials requested funding for critical mechanical, electrical, plumbing, roof, and structural repairs, including $15.78 million for Kentucky State Penitentiary utilities infrastructure and additional funding for North Point Training Center projects. They also highlighted two re-entry initiatives: a KCTCS partnership for a re-entry campus at North Point and the East Kentucky Applied Manufacturing Institute at Eastern Kentucky Correctional Complex, both aimed at reducing recidivism through intensive training and job preparation. Members asked about the KCTCS re-entry model, and DOC explained it would be a more immersive, campus-style program than current prison-based vocational classes. The Department of Criminal Justice Training discussed projects at its Richmond campus and the planned Western Kentucky Training Center, including a replacement flat track and campus access road at Richmond and added training features in Madisonville. Officials said the Richmond changes were needed because EKU construction had removed the existing flat track and would affect access, while the Western Kentucky project would expand training capacity and reduce travel for law enforcement agencies. The Kentucky State Police then outlined the final phase of the statewide emergency radio system replacement, estimated at about $17.5 million, and said the system is being built in geographic phases; members asked how long completion would take, and staff estimated roughly four years after funding, assuming no major inflation spikes. No votes were taken, and the meeting remained informational with member questions and staff responses.

Transcript Highlights:

• universities the authority and and the duty to place content-neutral, time, place, and manner restrictions
• in 2972, the prohibition on disruptive activities between 10 p.m. and 8 a.m. and several restrictions
• Instead, it should have been upheld as a rule. reasonable restrictions of time, place, and manner of
• weeks. of the semester so the students could complete their exams without disruption. and place restrictions
• I'm pretty sure texaneum does. restricted by your 40 acres, I'm sure. But having said that is the.

Keywords: 1185, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• THEY ARE OUR RESTRICTIONS. THESE ARE NOT FOR FOREVER.
• WILL SAVE MOST OF MY COMMENTS FOR THE BILL ITSELF BUT THIS AMENDMENT DOES WANT TO MAKE IT LESS RESTRICTIVE
• ABOUT SITUATIONS BEYOND THEIR CONTROL THAT DEMAND COMPASSIONATE SUPPORTIVE RATHER THAN PUNITIVE OR RESTRICTIVE
• THERE'S NO AGE RESTRICTION ON IT.
• CHAIR COLLINS, MY QUESTION IS AS PERTAINS TO THE VACCINE, IS IT YOUR INTENT IN THIS BILL FOR US TO RESTRICT

Keywords: 999, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• Um, as Representative Hudson indicated, we are not looking to expand uh or reduce or restrict or any
• It is actually more restrictive.
• It is actually more restrictive. We're only talking about convictions.
• > talking</c><00:11:49.200><c> about</c> restrictive.
• We're only talking about restrictive.

Bills: HF2233, HF1524, HF1893, HF1396, HF2456, HF2959, HF2300, HF2412, HF3022, HF2825, HF1862, HF1373, HF1039, HF3070

Keywords: Uniform Special Deposits Act, special deposit, banking law, financial institutions, escrow, escrow account, trust account, security deposit, beneficiary, depositor, creditor process, garnishment, attachment, levy, setoff, recoupment, financial market infrastructure, retirement benefits, compensation, earnest money

Transcript Highlights:

• I have always believed that the ratio of PAs to physicians restricts access to care, and I think it's
• a witness to the daily struggles faced by our community due to outdated practice agreements and restrictive
• a witness to the daily struggles faced by our community due to outdated practice agreements and restrictive
• So I have the experience of going from a less restrictive state to a more restrictive state, which has
• to engage with government bodies, and we need to ensure we're prioritizing access for help, not restricting

Summary: The joint sunset oversight hearing reviewed five regulatory entities: the Board of Behavioral Sciences, the Board of Psychology, the Physician Assistant Board, the Podiatric Medical Board, and the California Massage Therapy Council. Across the hearing, each entity described recent accomplishments, licensing and enforcement workload, workforce shortages, and efforts to modernize processes. Common themes included streamlining licensure, expanding access to care, addressing telehealth or emerging technology, and balancing consumer protection with workforce needs. For the Board of Behavioral Sciences, members discussed workforce shortages in mental health, supervision barriers, telehealth confidentiality, AI in therapy, interstate compacts, school-based services, and military spouse licensure. The board said it has expanded outreach, improved licensing processes, and created temporary practice authority tracking, while also expressing concern about counseling compacts and emphasizing California-specific law, ethics, and cultural competency. Public commenters supported the board’s work and the possible move to a national MFT exam, while also urging more resources. The Board of Psychology highlighted fee adjustments, streamlined licensure pathways, enforcement process improvements, new CPD requirements, and proposed changes including a psychotherapist-client privilege exception for investigations. Committee members and public witnesses focused heavily on that privilege proposal, with some members opposing it as too broad and privacy-invasive, while the board argued it is needed to obtain records in bias and sexual misconduct cases. The board also discussed workforce shortages, processing improvements, and the use of inactive status for psychological associates. The Physician Assistant Board reported growth in the PA workforce and education programs, SB 697 implementation, and financial pressure from rising enforcement costs. The main policy debate centered on physician-to-PA ratios and practice agreements, with board representatives and many public commenters arguing that current restrictions limit access to care, especially in rural areas, while the California Medical Association defended the need for explicit ratios and agreements. The board also discussed AI, fee increases, and tracking temporary practice authority. The Podiatric Medical Board described licensing and renewal reforms, residency expansion, enforcement support, and budget constraints, while public testimony raised concerns about a proposed fee increase and about reimbursement parity and practice recognition for podiatrists. Finally, the California Massage Therapy Council defended the certification model over licensure, citing lower costs, local government collaboration, anti-trafficking work, and its role in vetting applications and disciplining bad actors; no formal votes or final actions were taken during this portion of the hearing.

Transcript Highlights:

• </c><01:10:39.520><c> we</c><01:10:39.719><c> had</c><01:10:39.880><c> no</c><01:10:40.080><c> restrictions
• </c> forth in our plan we had no restrictions forth in our plan we had no restrictions on<01:10:40.840
• to March 21, and asked the committee to look at their March schedules to see if anybody has any restrictions
• 13:24.400><c> any</c> schedules and see if anybody has any schedules and see if anybody has any restriction
• <01:13:25.400><c> or</c> restriction or restriction or any any any um um um request<01:13:32.120><c>

Keywords: 928, house, all

Summary: The Fiscal Committee met on February 21 and first approved the January 30 minutes and the consent calendar, with item 2540 removed by the Department of Education and item 25057 set aside for discussion. The committee then took up FIS 25057, a Department of Transportation request tied to a federal grant for building information modeling and related data standardization across DOT systems. Transportation officials explained that the $2.405 million consultant-heavy request would connect surveying, design, construction, and asset management systems, improve efficiency and long-term asset tracking, and help the department catch up with other states. Several senators questioned the lack of immediate, quantifiable budget savings and the reliance on consultants, but the item was ultimately adopted. The committee next approved FIS 25054 for the Department of Health and Human Services after questioning a $16 million shortfall in the Children’s Health Insurance Program. DHHS explained the variance as a budgeting and accounting issue tied to separating CHIP from Medicaid managed care, pandemic-era continuous enrollment, and the new federal requirement for 12 months of continuous coverage for children. Members also approved a Cannon Mountain fee item, where park officials described a proposed price freeze for early-bird passes, a new in-season tier, and modest increases in off-season pricing, while noting operating cost pressures, strong snow conditions, and favorable customer value ratings. That item was adopted unanimously. The committee also approved the Department of Corrections item after discussion of staffing, retirement eligibility, overtime, and recidivism. Commissioner Helen Hanks said retirement-eligible staff had declined slightly, recruitment was improving, overtime hours were down, one housing floor had been closed because of lower population, and the department had reduced reincarceration by 8% over seven years, which she said produced substantial savings. The item was adopted. During informational items, the committee heard a Legislative Budget Assistant performance audit of the New Hampshire Commission for Human Rights. The audit found the commission inefficient and ineffective in processing complaints, with average case closure taking 840 days, significant backlogs dating back decades, expired administrative rules, weak management controls, disorganized and outdated procedures, unreliable data, and unresolved prior audit findings. The audit included 25 recommendations, two of which may require legislative action. Commission staff said they appreciated the recommendations and expected the additional resources from the prior budget cycle to help address the backlog and improve transparency and efficiency.

Transcript Highlights:

• Then it brings in restrictions for accountability and transparency and fiscal protections.
• ><c> and</c> restrictions for accountability and restrictions for accountability and transparency<03:
• On page 22, subsection A is the specific restrictions, and these are federal restrictions as well, but
• the specific restrictions, and these are<03:44:48.080><c> federal</c><03:44:48.479><c> restrictions</
• These are language that was taken from the restrictions and financial accountability act and restrictions

Keywords: 916, all

Transcript Highlights:

• A managed access system, although not foolproof, allows us to control and restrict unauthorized cellular
• As I mentioned, restrictions on books.
• As I mentioned, restrictions on books.
• Similarly, recent restrictions on books raise concerns about proportionality and access.
• And then restricting private security license exemptions under 1702, under the Occupations Code 1702,

Keywords: 1185, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• engagement and the goal of ensuring safe, clinician-led care, we feel the bill would significantly restrict
• We do believe. ...individuals, and restricting access to historical data weakens all of those functions
• We proposed a balanced framework that retains strong privacy protections, restricts access, and tiers
• But that breaks down the moment large platforms controlling distribution use their power to restrict
• It's getting harder and harder to run a small business when we're restricted by laws that don't seem

Summary: The committee heard several bills focused on AI, privacy, and surveillance. SB 903 would prohibit AI from independently providing psychotherapy or presenting itself as a licensed mental health provider, require disclosure and informed consent, and reinforce confidentiality and privacy protections for therapy records. Supporters, including a mother and therapist whose son died by suicide after extensive chats with ChatGPT, argued the bill is needed to prevent harmful, crisis-related interactions. Behavioral health groups and labor/privacy organizations supported the measure, while TechNet, the California Medical Association, and the California Hospital Association opposed unless amended, saying the bill could restrict useful clinical tools and create conflicts around triage, screening, and data use. The committee passed SB 903 4-0 to Appropriations, with members noting the need for further work on definitions and implementation. SB 1119 would create a broader framework for chatbot safety for children, including annual risk assessments, crisis response protocols, default child protections, parental controls, notice and time limits, restrictions on advertising and use of children’s data, incident reporting, audits, and a private right of action. The author and supporters again cited the death of Adam Raine as evidence that chatbots can reinforce suicidal ideation and isolate children. Common Sense Media and several labor and privacy groups supported the bill. CalChamber, TechNet, the California State Sheriffs’ Association, and other industry and local government groups opposed unless amended, raising concerns about vague standards, overlap with SB 243, prescriptive design mandates, and litigation risk. The committee approved SB 1119 4-0 to Judiciary, with amendments to be taken there. The committee also heard SB 1013, which would tighten rules for automated license plate reader data by requiring DOJ audits, employee training, and a 30-day retention limit for most data. Supporters said the bill responds to documented misuse and over-retention of data that mostly belongs to innocent drivers. Law enforcement groups opposed, arguing the retention limit would hinder investigations and reduce the usefulness of ALPRs in serious or delayed cases. The bill passed 4-1 to Appropriations. SB 1292, a local control bill for six cities, would allow camera or sensor-based enforcement of curb and loading zones, with a human reviewing each violation before issuance. Supporters said it would help cities manage congestion and unsafe blocking of bike lanes and loading zones; privacy advocates warned about expanding automated surveillance. It passed 4-1 to Appropriations. Finally, the committee heard SB 1101, which would require higher education institutions to notify students, faculty, and staff when personal information is shared with federal agencies and limit disclosure to what is legally required. Supporters framed it as a transparency and anti-doxing measure in response to recent federal investigations and subpoenas; there was no opposition testimony. The bill passed 5-0 to Appropriations. The committee then began hearing SB 951, the California Worker Technological Displacement Act, which would require advance notice and reporting when employers displace workers due to technology and give displaced workers priority for openings, but the transcript cuts off before the hearing concluded.

Transcript Highlights:

• I think that this is a little overly restrictive as written.
• 00:45:18.800><c> a</c><00:45:18.960><c> little</c><00:45:19.119><c> overly</c><00:45:19.599><c> restrictive
• </c> that this is a little overly restrictive that this is a little overly restrictive as<00:45:20.319
• Under this bill, once the cabinet determines a restriction is no longer necessary, notice is sent to
• a restriction is no longer<01:25:52.800><c> necessary,</c><01:25:53.840><c> notice</c><01:25:54.239>

Keywords: 958, all

Transcript Highlights:

• So, this would be restricted only to hospitals with a hospice unit if I understand the amendment."
• So, this would<00:46:13.599><c> be</c><00:46:13.760><c> restricted</c><00:46:14.160><c> only</c><00:46
• :14.400><c> to</c><00:46:14.640><c> hospitals</c> would be restricted only to hospitals would be restricted
• 46:35.280><c> only</c> on 33 through 35 so that you're only on 33 through 35 so that you're only restricting
• this bill to hospitals with restricting this bill to hospitals with hospice<00:46:41.599><c> facilities

Keywords: Public Health and Welfare - Room 216, 25 February, 2026; 3:00 PM, 925, all

Transcript Highlights:

• Now, this bill talks about restricting that on sterilization, and part of it, and maybe I'm missing the
• </c><01:00:49.359><c> that</c><01:00:49.599><c> on</c> about uh that restricting that on about uh that
• restricting that on sterilization<01:00:50.559><c> and</c><01:00:50.799><c> part</c><01:00:50.960><c
• I don't think we need to try to stuff anything more into that bag, especially with the bag restrictions
• </c> bag restrictions we have in this state. bag restrictions we have in this state.

Keywords: 981, all

Transcript Highlights:

• However, the RTC relies on federal transportation planning funds, which are restricted to transportation
• For these reasons, I urge you to oppose the bill and support policies that expand rather than restrict
• The chamber does not believe that you should limit competition with distance restrictions or moratoriums
• Furthermore, exempting physician-owned practices from these restrictions fosters a fairer competitive
• Furthermore, exempting physician-owned practices from these restrictions fosters a fairer competitive

Bills: AB568, SB90, SB133, SB147, SB229, SB233, SB240, SB245, SB280, SB378, SB393, SB417, SB434, SB494, SB495

Keywords: higher education, Nevada System of Higher Education, operational expenses, instructional expenses, public funding, education funding, teacher grants, classroom supplies, instructional support, specialized personnel, civics education, Nevada Center for Civic Engagement, funding, youth programs, civic involvement, Southern Nevada, Clark County, Las Vegas Valley, regional planning, economic resiliency

Transcript Highlights:

• Line 17 is related to the restricted<00:08:46.399><c> use</c><00:08:46.640><c> pesticide</c><00:08:47.200
• ><c> plan</c><00:08:47.440><c> updates</c> restricted use pesticide plan updates restricted use pesticide
• Top of page R6 is another House-only writer to update MDA's restricted use pesticide plan to account
• 00:32:12.960><c> to</c><00:32:13.279><c> update</c><00:32:13.600><c> MDA's</c><00:32:14.240><c> restricted
• </c> onlyly writer to update MDA's restricted onlyly writer to update MDA's restricted use<00:32:14.880

Keywords: 919, house, all

Summary: The Agriculture Conference Committee met for an initial organizational and comparison session on House File 2446, the agriculture broadband and rural development bill. Members introduced themselves, noted that no conference target had yet been set, and agreed to begin with a side-by-side review of House and Senate positions. No oral testimony was taken; instead, the chair listed written testimony submitted by a wide range of agricultural, environmental, local government, food bank, and industry groups. Nonpartisan fiscal staff walked through the major funding differences. Both bills included some shared items such as operating adjustments, wolf and elk damage compensation, and certain technical changes, but they differed on several major appropriations. The House generally proposed larger increases for meat inspection, local food purchasing, and the Board of Animal Health, and added items such as county inspector grants, biofertilizer innovation, a biosolids/PFAS-related study, a soil health study, broadband installation study funding, an Agri Works program, an Agri Support program, a milk grant program, and several House-only transfers and grants. The Senate included items such as a climate coordinator position, biofuel-related reductions and policy changes, livestock processing funding, farm-to-school and urban agriculture changes, MARL funding, cottage foods licensing updates, and several Senate-only pass-through grants and transfers. Staff also noted differences in the agriculture emergency account transfer approach and in how the two bodies handled the Second Harvest Heartland and related food distribution provisions. House Research then reviewed the policy language differences in the bill. The House language included provisions allowing more flexible use of grant administration funds, unpaid prior-year claims, county inspector grants, and updates tied to its own policy article, while the Senate language included the climate coordinator, PFAS-related commercialization language, cooperative development grant permissive language, and other Senate policy changes. The committee did not take any votes or final actions at this meeting; the session was informational and focused on identifying differences for later negotiation.

Transcript Highlights:

• So for those of us parents that are restricting our kids to two hours or less, think of all the children
• As such, for nearly 30 years, As such, for nearly 30 years, California has restricted the use of electronic
• These restrictions effectively shut out low-income and unrepresented litigants who need the protection
• AB 928 presupposes that cockfighting is a rampant issue in California, justifying heightened restrictions
• This bill will severely restrict and may even decimate many successful lines of purebred poultry that

Summary: The committee heard several bills, beginning with AB 2, which would create enhanced civil penalties for large social media companies when negligence proven in court causes harm to children and teens. The author and supporters argued the bill is needed to address addictive algorithms and harmful content, while opponents warned it was vague, could chill speech, and might be preempted by federal law. Members largely focused on whether the bill changed the standard of care or burden of proof; the bill passed out of committee on a roll call vote, with some members noting concerns but supporting it to continue the discussion. AB 282, dealing with housing vouchers and source-of-income discrimination, would clarify that housing providers may prioritize applicants who qualify for rental assistance without violating fair housing law. Supporters from housing authorities, local governments, and advocacy groups said it would help voucher holders find units and improve use of housing funds. There was no opposition, and the bill passed to Appropriations on a roll call vote, with two no votes. The committee also considered AB 882 on court reporter availability and electronic recording in certain cases when a court reporter is unavailable. Supporters said the bill is a temporary, narrowly tailored response to a shortage of reporters and would preserve access to accurate records, while opponents argued it was too narrow, raised access-to-justice concerns, and should be broadened. Members from both sides emphasized the importance of court reporters and electronic recording as a backup; the bill passed with an urgency clause and was sent to Appropriations. The committee then heard AB 325 on algorithmic price fixing, AB 935 on civil rights data clarity, AB 1414 on tenant choice of internet service provider, and AB 67 on Attorney General enforcement of the Reproductive Privacy Act; each drew support from sponsors and advocacy groups, opposition centered on overbreadth or policy concerns, and each advanced on committee votes, with several members requesting further amendments or clarification.

Transcript Highlights:

• I request as earnestly as possible that you remove this unjustified restriction and allow my son and
• I request as earnestly as possible that you remove this unjustified restriction and allow my son and
• I request as earnestly as possible that you remove this unjustified restriction and allow my son and
• Are we, is there any restrictions on us seeing that?
• Are we, is there any restrictions on us seeing that?

Summary: The committee heard a budget oversight hearing on the Department of Health Care Services, focusing first on the overall Medi-Cal budget and a March General Fund loan to cover a current-year shortfall. DHCS said the 2025-26 budget proposal totals $193.4 billion, with Medi-Cal projected at $188.1 billion total funds and $42.1 billion General Fund, driven by higher enrollment, pharmacy costs, managed care growth, and costs tied to eligibility expansions and the COVID-era redetermination unwinding. The department said the $3.44 billion loan was needed to manage cash flow and ensure timely payments to providers and plans, while the LAO noted Medi-Cal’s cash-basis budgeting creates volatility and that more detailed estimates would come with the May Revision. Members discussed federal Medicaid threats, the need for transparency on cost drivers, and the impact of pharmacy spending, long-term care, and immigration-related coverage expansions. The second major topic was family health programs, including California Children’s Services, the continuous coverage unwinding, and opioid settlement fund spending. DHCS described CCS funding methodology changes, ongoing county stakeholder work, and a delayed rollout of CCS monitoring and oversight until July 1, 2025, while county representatives and advocates argued the program is underfunded and asked for more technical assistance and a delay in implementation. On the unwinding, the department explained that federal redetermination flexibilities helped maintain coverage after the pandemic, but the Governor’s budget proposes ending them at the end of June 2025; advocates urged making the flexibilities permanent to avoid coverage losses. For opioid settlement funds, DHCS and Finance said the budget increases funding for naloxone distribution while reducing other harm-reduction spending based on updated settlement revenues, prompting criticism from members and public commenters who argued the change would weaken effective harm-reduction programs. The hearing also included an update on Proposition 35 implementation. DHCS said the voter-approved measure continuously appropriates MCO tax revenues beginning in 2025, with up to $4.6 billion annually available for specified Medi-Cal and provider investments in 2025 and 2026, but implementation depends on consultation with the required stakeholder advisory committee. The department and LAO noted uncertainty about future federal rules affecting the MCO tax after 2026. Public testimony largely supported maintaining Medi-Cal expansions, protecting immigrant coverage, preserving harm-reduction funding, and increasing support for community health workers, pediatric dental care, and CCS county administration. No votes were taken during the portion of the hearing provided.

Transcript Highlights:

• This is a resource that should not be restricted to the few and the fortunate.
• ><00:26:09.360><c> should</c><00:26:09.520><c> not</c><00:26:09.679><c> be</c><00:26:09.840><c> restricted
• </c> resource that should not be restricted resource that should not be restricted to<00:26:10.399><c
• :26:56.080><c> specifically</c> assembly Bill 1780 specifically assembly Bill 1780 specifically restricting
• the practice at private restricting the practice at private colle<00:26:58.240><c> Coles</c><00:26:58.440

Keywords: 1187, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• And the answer to your second question would be why should we restrict it to just one storm?
• And the answer to your second question would be why should we restrict it to just one storm?
• second question would be why<00:22:28.240><c> should</c><00:22:28.480><c> we</c><00:22:28.720><c> restrict
• </c><00:22:29.200><c> restrict</c><00:22:29.679><c> it</c><00:22:29.840><c> to</c> why should we restrict
• restrict it to why should we restrict restrict it to just<00:22:30.240><c> one</c><00:22:30.480><c>

Keywords: 1189, house, all

Transcript Highlights:

• So folks are going to be moving from full scope to restricted scope Medi-Cal. Let's start there.
• And so it is no longer included in the restricted scope benefit.
• We also continue to oppose restricting health care access for 200,000 immigrants, including refugees,
• We also continue to oppose restricting health care access for 200,000 immigrants, including refugees,
• We also continue to oppose restricting health care access for 200,000 immigrants, including refugees,

Keywords: 988, house, all