Transcript Highlights:

• But one of the comments, one of the things I noticed that wasn't in this version that I've got is on
• unit may not require the replacement of a repairable septic system within 10 years of receipt of notice
• sure that we weren't doing what Minnesota did, where they changed their law and then everybody got notice

Committee: House Energy and Natural Resources

Summary: The House Energy and Natural Resources Committee met with a quorum and took up several bills, beginning with Senate Bill 2267 on on-site wastewater systems. DEQ testified that the bill would make DEQ the sole agency responsible for developing statewide wastewater code and licensing installers, replace local public health unit codes, create enforcement authority and civil penalties, and provide a $99,500 general fund appropriation for implementation. Members discussed whether the bill and proposed amendments adequately protected existing functioning or nonconforming septic systems, and DEQ said it would compare the Senate amendment with the committee’s draft and return the next day with feedback. The committee then considered Senate Bill 2339, a wildfire mitigation plan bill, and adopted amendment 02001 with a change from “Shell” to “May” on one line. After amendment, the bill passed 9-3 on a do pass as amended vote, despite opposition from members who argued it created a utility carve-out, reduced liability exposure for utilities, and incentivized safety without requiring compliance. The companion study bill, Senate Bill 2340, on fire service operational response needs also received a do pass recommendation, and the committee later agreed it should be handled on the floor before the mitigation bill so the two measures could be explained together. The committee also approved Senate Bill 2210, a study bill on watershed boundaries, with members noting it would help inform ongoing work on related water legislation. Finally, Senate Bill 2325, dealing with ordinary high watermark determination, received a unanimous do not pass recommendation after members expressed concern that high-water-mark language is difficult to define and may be better addressed in a separate study or resolution. The committee adjourned after noting that DEQ would return the next day with proposed amendments and that work on Senate Bill 2276 would continue with interested parties.

Transcript Highlights:

• What that does is it requires all grounds for appeal to be stated in the initial notice.
• And what this does um my initial notice.
• What does that signify in terms of public notice?
• Uh, if does by right exempt it from any notice for regional impact?
• </c> public notice? public notice?

Committee: House Municipal and County Government

Transcript Highlights:

• committees will reconvene and<00:01:44.720><c> a</c><00:01:44.880><c> public</c><00:01:45.040><c> notice
• Briefing materials from today's presentation are linked from the briefing notice and will also be posted
• As noted on the notice, this is a special briefing on Hawaii's election process and is purposely being
• </c><00:02:16.879><c> and</c><00:02:17.120><c> will</c> linked from the briefing notice and will linked
• ,</c><00:02:27.760><c> this</c> As noted on the not on the notice, this As noted on the not on the notice

Transcript Highlights:

• I'm here to present SB 1417, the Mutual Water Company Rate and Disclosure Notice Act.
• convene a public meeting to discuss the proposed service increase, send the written proposal and notice
• convene a public meeting to discuss the proposed service increase, send the written proposal and notice
• No notice, no payment plans.
• Notice of that meeting was provided to all shareholders, both by email, website posting, and mail.

Summary: The committee first heard SB 804, the Hydrogen Pipeline Safety Act, from Senator Arreguín. He said the bill would designate the State Fire Marshal as the safety regulator for intrastate hydrogen pipelines and require hydrogen-specific standards, while not mandating any pipeline construction or bypassing environmental review. Supporters included labor groups, utility employees, and the City of Burbank, while Air Products opposed unless amended, citing concerns about the bill’s specificity, fee structure, and the need for a hydrogen-specific rulemaking process. The committee discussed safety, fees, and regulatory certainty, and later passed SB 804 on a 9-0 vote to Emergency Management with commitment to take amendments. The committee then took up SB 905 by Senator Becker, aimed at reducing electricity rates by changing utility incentives. The bill would tie part of executive compensation to keeping rates below inflation, require more performance metrics, and allow the CPUC to consider lower returns on equity for certain lower-risk investments and alternative financing options. Support came from consumer, environmental, agricultural, and large energy user groups, while Southern California Edison, CalChamber, PG&E, and utility labor groups raised concerns that the bill could reduce investment, create regulatory uncertainty, and raise borrowing costs. After extensive discussion about utility affordability, wildfire costs, and capital markets, the committee passed SB 905 on a 7-1 vote to Appropriations. SB 913, also by Senator Becker, would create a clearer pathway for distributed energy resources such as batteries and smart thermostats to participate in the resource adequacy market and compete with utility-scale resources. Supporters said the bill would better use existing grid capacity, lower costs, and build on the state’s Demand Side Grid Support Program; PG&E opposed unless amended, saying the use case was not yet proven and was already being addressed in other rulemakings. After the committee accepted amendments, one opposition group moved to neutral and another said it might do so after reviewing the changes. The bill passed 8-0 to Appropriations and was placed on call. Several other measures were heard and advanced, including SB 1196 on faster utility hookups for small energization projects such as ADUs and EV chargers, SB 931 reauthorizing the Diablo Canyon Essential Services Mitigation Fund through 2028, SB 1158 reducing the frequency of joint reliability assessments from quarterly to twice yearly, and SB 1245 directing further study of California’s gasoline market and potential use of non-CARBOB fuel during supply disruptions. SB 1196 and SB 931 both passed with broad support and no opposition after amendments, SB 1158 passed without testimony, and SB 1245 drew strong support from consumer and environmental advocates but opposition from fuel industry and business groups concerned about costs, confidentiality, and fuel standards.

Transcript Highlights:

• So at that point in time, a meeting would be noticed, that public meeting would be noticed, and what
• they were to take up or consider at that meeting would be on that notice.
• So that is the public notice for consideration of designation.
• to an agenda, and there is a meeting notice for the governor and the cabinet to consider such a topic
• , that it will be difficult to escape notice when we will be talking about it and hearing about it in

Bills: S0500 , S0536 , S0762 , S1582 , S1632 , S1634 , S1742 , S1750 , S1792

Committee: Senate Appropriations Committee on Criminal and Civil Justice

Summary: The committee first considered SB 536, which updates Florida’s criminal gang statutes to reflect modern recruitment and communication methods, including social media and encrypted messaging. Senator Martin and supporters said the bill does not criminalize gang membership, but helps law enforcement and prosecutors establish gang-related connections for warrants and sentencing enhancements. Senator Smith raised concerns about the lowered threshold for being observed with gang members and possible unintended impacts on business owners and others; Martin said the language was not intended to cover ordinary business interactions and that a gang tattoo must be one used by the gang. After an amendment aligning the Senate bill with the House version was adopted, the committee reported CS/SB 536 favorably. The committee also favorably reported CS/SB 762, which allows chief judges to assign capital conflict cases across regional counsel offices, with an amendment requiring judges to consider judicial economy and geographic proximity. Testimony from regional counsel emphasized projected long-term savings, estimated at about $150 million over 10 years. The committee then approved CS/SB 1742, creating a new indecent exposure offense involving sexual conduct directed at minors, and CS/SB 1750, which increases penalties for serious sex crimes and child sexual abuse material offenses; both bills were amended before passage, with law enforcement groups appearing in support. The committee next took up SB 1582, which creates statewide data sharing for secondhand dealer and pawnbroker transactions without creating a new state-run database, while preserving confidentiality protections and law enforcement access. An amendment was adopted, and pawnbroker and recycling stakeholders testified in support. The linked public records bill, SB 1792, creating an exemption for those transaction records while allowing certain information to be released to alleged owners, was also reported favorably. The committee then approved CS/SB 500, which provides FDLE protective security details to major party nominees for governor, lieutenant governor, and cabinet offices after primary certification and until the general election is resolved; a technical amendment was adopted, and the bill was described as mirroring federal candidate protection practices. The longest and most contentious discussion was on CS/SB 1632, which would bar Florida courts from enforcing foreign or religious law in a way that overrides the U.S. or Florida constitutions and would create a process for designating foreign or domestic terrorist organizations, with related consequences for schools, funding, and student conduct. Senator Grall said the bill is intended to protect constitutional principles and target violent, criminal conduct rather than protected speech or religious practice, and she explained that designations would follow a public process with judicial review. Senators Smith and Polsky pressed repeatedly on First Amendment, due process, vagueness, and academic-speech concerns, asking how “promotion” would be defined and whether students, attorneys, or advocacy groups could be swept in; Grall said she was open to clarifying language but maintained the bill is aimed at furthering illegal acts, not mere opinion. Numerous speakers opposed the bill, warning it could be used to target Muslim students, religious communities, advocacy groups, and political dissent, while a few supporters argued it was needed for public safety. The transcript ends during public testimony on SB 1632, with no final committee vote shown in the excerpt.

Transcript Highlights:

• and we need to look at this us on notice and we need to look at this differently<00:18:12.880><c> or
• Um, and then we've noticed lots of media campaigns.
• Um, you'll notice some meal expenditures here.
• Um you'll notice rented in Switzerland.
• Um you'll notice some<00:48:05.599><c> meal</c><00:48:06.160><c> expenditures</c><00:48:06.800><c> here

Committee: House Appropriations & Revenue

Transcript Highlights:

• House rules require notices to be posted 48 hours in advance.
• So that means for a Wednesday hearing like today, we’re going to put out the hearing notice on Friday
• For a Friday notice, it will go out on Tuesday, which we abided for the February 6th hearing.
• on Friday, the out the hearing notice on Friday, the week<00:12:48.560><c> before.
• For a Friday notice, it week before.

Committee: House Education

Summary: The House Committee on Higher Education met on February 4 and began with announcements about committee protocol, including posting hearing notices and testimony earlier than required and using written HD1 drafts for more complex amendments. The chair also noted the new AV system and asked speakers to be clear because the microphones are sensitive. The committee then took up several University of Hawaiʻi-related measures, with most testimony coming from UH officials, state agencies, and advocacy groups, and no votes were taken in the portion provided. HB 1596, relating to student basic needs support at the University of Hawaiʻi, drew support from UH, the Oʻahu Youth Action Board, and an individual. UH said it stood on its written testimony and could answer questions. HB 1597, relating to Alzheimer’s disease and related dementias research, received support from UH/JABSOM, the Alzheimer’s Association, the Hawaii Medical Association, and others; the Attorney General’s Office offered a procedural reminder about statewide concern. HB 1970, funding the University of Hawaiʻi Cancer Center and the Hawaii Tumor Registry, was supported by UH, the American Cancer Society Cancer Action Network, the Hawaii Medical Association, and others, with testimony emphasizing the registry’s role in cancer surveillance, prevention, and federal funding. The committee also heard HB 1598, creating a Hawaii Climate Institute. UH testified in support, citing worsening drought, heat, sea level rise, and extreme weather, and said the institute would hire climate modelers and faculty across several schools. Members questioned funding, and UH said it would seek state startup money, possible green-fee support, and federal grants, noting recent federal cuts and the need for permanent positions. HB 1989, on water retention, was supported by UH as a study to slow runoff and improve aquifer recharge. HB 1951, on biosecurity, drew support from UH, DLNR, the Hawaii Farm Bureau, students, and other organizations; testimony stressed invasive species threats, the need for biocontrol research and containment capacity, and possible sites for a statewide facility. HB 1952, funding agricultural research station improvements on Kauaʻi, was supported by UH, the Farm Bureau, and others, with testimony noting aging facilities and the need to modernize stations across the islands. Finally, HB 2005, relating to language access, received UH support, with a UH representative noting that credit programs may fit best in a credit-bearing academic program and that Outreach College could be an option for noncredit programs.

Transcript Highlights:

• reconvene to discuss any outstanding business on Monday, April 14, 2025, in Room 229, and a public notice
• Um, are you noticing in your capacity that the Department of Education is collaborating well with SFA
• Um, are you noticing you for being here.
• Um, are you noticing in<00:38:38.800><c> your</c><00:38:38.960><c> capacity</c><00:38:39.599><c> that
• Um, what have you noticed that have caused concerns with DOE and and SFA and the need for DOE to have

Summary: The Senate Committee on Education heard several advice-and-consent nominations to the School Facilities Authority. For GM779, Shelley Pa was introduced as a nominee for a term ending June 30, 2029. The Department of Education supported her nomination, citing her large-scale operations and stakeholder-engagement experience. In her testimony, Pa said she retired from community policing, wanted to give back to teachers and students, and believed her strengths were collaboration, listening to community input, and helping balance differing priorities. Committee members questioned her about the construction and infrastructure focus of the board, her lack of direct construction experience, and how she would handle disagreements and budget limits; she responded that she would rely on collaboration, ask questions, and keep decisions centered on students, teachers, and the community while staying within budget. The committee then heard GM777 and GM778 for Robert Davis, with terms ending June 30, 2025 and June 30, 2029. Davis described more than 30 years with the Department of Education, including roles as teacher, coach, counselor, vice principal, principal, and complex area superintendent, and said he had worked on major facilities projects and managed pandemic-era funding. He emphasized communication, transparency, and trust, and explained that his experience on the Early Learning Board helped him understand how to set policy, identify schools for pre-K, and use data and community factors in decision-making. Members asked how he would handle SFA’s growing pains, the need to balance DOE wishes with practical and budgetary limits, and the board’s role when the legislature controls funding; Davis said the board must keep communication open, include the right people, and make sensible decisions that move projects forward without stalling. For GM780, nominee Michael Unbasami was introduced for a term ending June 30, 2029. The Department of Education supported him, highlighting over five decades of public service and experience in facilities management, finance, and legislative affairs. Unbasami said he had recently retired after 31 years as associate vice president for administrative affairs for the community colleges and had extensive experience with facilities planning, construction, renovation, repairs, and working within budgets. He stated that the DOE should be treated as the SFA’s client because it knows student, teacher, and facility needs best, while SFA’s role is to implement construction work and collaborate on priorities. Committee members pressed him on how to balance DOE requests with practical project delivery, especially for teacher housing and other non-classroom needs, and he said the legislature funds the work, SFA must keep projects moving, and the workflow should involve collaboration but also realistic decisions that fit the budget and avoid delays.

Transcript Highlights:

• The original version reads: After receipt of this notice, you in bad faith take action to frustrate the
• The revised version says: If you get this notice, then do something in bad faith to try and block or
• you in bad faith receipt of this notice you in bad faith take<00:02:49.360><c> action</c><00:02:49.640
• The notice would describe the complaint and explain the process and the timelines.
• Once that notice is given, the filer has 21 calendar days to respond.

Bills: HF2543 , HF2566 , HF2627

Committee: House Commerce Finance and Policy

Transcript Highlights:

• Sixty-two percent received disenrollment notices, and the majority of that, 3,400, are going through
• Providers have 60 days to respond to that disenrollment notice and to initiate an appeal.
• </c><00:46:25.760><c> of</c> after get getting a notice of after get getting a notice of disenrollment
• </c><01:34:51.360><c> in</c> revalidate or to respond to notices in revalidate or to respond to notices
• </c><01:42:08.560><c> Now</c> child's PCAs with little notice. Now child's PCAs with little notice.

Committee: Senate Human Services

Transcript Highlights:

• Officially<00:45:05.200><c> what</c><00:45:05.440><c> I</c><00:45:05.599><c> notice</c><00:45:05.920>
• in this bill is Officially what I notice in this bill is that<00:45:07.920><c> um</c><00:45:08.160><
• and is able to cross-examine the notice and is able to cross-examine the witnesses.<00:48:55.920><c>
• </c><00:49:09.760><c> and</c> suspect to be put on notice and suspect to be put on notice and essentially
• His mom noticed because they were on a joint account, asked him about it.

Committee: Senate Judiciary

Transcript Highlights:

• And it does provide residents and the nonprofits a strict legal notice requirement from the owner of
• The detailed notice must indicate that the park owner has received an offer it's considering, and it
• The<01:18:29.120><c> detailed</c><01:18:29.520><c> notice</c><01:18:29.920><c> must</c><01:18:30.239>
• <c> indicate</c><01:18:30.640><c> that</c> The detailed notice must indicate that The detailed notice
• And then it goes on to speak about the notice.

Committee: Senate Housing and Homelessness Prevention

Transcript Highlights:

• billboards; you notice a beautiful state.
• You don't notice what you're not seeing.
• You don't notice what you're not seeing.
• you notice a beautiful state Billboards you notice a beautiful state you<01:15:46.199><c> don't</c><
• </c><01:15:47.440><c> seeing</c> you don't notice what you're not seeing you don't notice what you're

Committee: Senate Transportation

Transcript Highlights:

• Um, I just was a question: if they notice the parent, like there is a notice, like a $60...
• There was a notice for him to know he owes $6. Uh, do the child support notices go out for $6?
• Yeah, there's... we sent notices.
• Once they've hit that threshold, they get the notice, and then they're on notice. $6 uh do the child
• . notice uh we are both straying a bit notice uh we are both straying a bit from<04:38:56.400><c> the

Summary: The meeting began with committee process reminders from the chair, including rules for questioning witnesses, time limits for testimony, and how motions and committee reports are handled. The chair also discussed the committee’s history, emphasized a cooperative approach with agencies and the Judiciary, and noted that a special committee on the Family Division of Circuit Court had previously done useful work; he said a new subcommittee could be appointed later to continue looking at judicial-system issues. He also mentioned that the Speaker’s office was expected to name members to the DHHS oversight committee by Friday at 1. The substantive presentation was from the Department of Health and Human Services’ Bureau of Child Support Services. Attorney John Williams introduced the bureau team, and Bureau Chief Lisa Dekowski described the program’s mission: encouraging responsible parenting, family self-sufficiency, and child well-being by locating parents, establishing paternity, setting or modifying support orders, and enforcing court-ordered child and medical support. She said the bureau operates statewide under Title IV-D of the Social Security Act, works with courts, employers, and other partners, and serves both in-state and out-of-state cases, with some international and tribal coordination. She also cited program scale, saying the bureau dispersed about $76 million to families in New Hampshire in fiscal year 2023 and that most collections go directly to families. Members asked about enforcement tools, especially passport denial. In response to a question about a case involving a very small shortfall, the bureau said the federal passport-denial threshold is $2,500 in arrears, not a few cents, and that denial remains in place until the balance is resolved or an arrangement is made with the agency, with hardship factors potentially considered. The bureau also explained that either parent can apply for services when a child support order exists and that the bureau can help initiate income withholding orders. No votes or formal actions were taken during this portion of the meeting.

Transcript Highlights:

• know there's multiple applications and they may vary in language, but on the critical equipment, I notice
• I know it's kind of a big question, but I just saw this one application and kind of noticed that Minot
• I know it's kind of a big question, but I just saw this one application and kind of noticing that Minot
• If there is a denial or termination or even a suspension or reduction in services, there will be a notice
• When you get an appeal, a simple yes, we got your notice of appeal, and when you make a decision, in

Summary: The committee was called to order, the roll was taken, and the March 18 minutes were approved. Members then received several project and program updates, beginning with CHI St. Alexius’s behavioral health buildouts in Bismarck, Williston, and Grand Forks. St. Alexius reported that the Bismarck project remains on track for June 2027 completion, with demolition underway and final design work nearing completion. Williston reported construction is progressing, staffing recruitment is underway for psychiatrists and other staff, and an air handler replacement is creating a roughly $750,000 unbudgeted barrier that will slightly delay the timeline. Grand Forks reported its expansion is about 30% complete, with no major barriers beyond weather, and leaders said the project should be substantially complete in the first quarter of 2027. The Department of Health and Human Services then presented a series of budget and program updates. Donna Ockland explained several recent line-item transfers as technical corrections that net to zero and do not require new spending, then reviewed salaries, wages, and FTE counts, noting the department remains within its authorized staffing levels. Pat Rainer followed with an update on the Rural Health Transformation Program, saying 12 opportunities have been posted, 422 applications received, and $8.4 million obligated so far, with a goal of obligating the full $199 million by September. He described grants for workforce retention, rural rotations and housing, community gardens, school wellness, behavioral health promotion, safety net services, equipment, technology, EMS, and other initiatives, emphasizing that the program is intended to be transformational and tied to metrics. Members asked extensive questions about how rural eligibility is defined, how grants will support both rural facilities and hub hospitals, and how future years of funding will build on current awards. The committee also heard an update on certified community behavioral health clinics from Elena Zeller, who said North Dakota has been accepted as a demonstration state, implementation is underway in Williston, North Central/Minot, Fargo, and Dickinson, and care coordination and service counts are increasing. Rebecca Askins then reviewed SNAP payment error rates, saying the 2025 rate was finalized at 9.89%, with the state aiming to get below 6% through policy updates, training, data tools, and a quality assurance team. Members pressed her on the causes of the error rate, the role of the SPACES software system, and the need for accountability and improvements. Finally, Dirk Wilkie reported the state laboratory project reached substantial completion on June 12 and is on budget at about $69.95 million, though a service elevator had to be redesigned because it was too small for equipment.

Transcript Highlights:

• Just for notice, Senate Bill 499 is being voluntarily deferred by the author and will not be heard today
• And we would also point out that all of these areas are already noticed in terms of where those are supposed
• to be, and those notices are required before someone can be arrested or detained before someone can
• to be and those notices are required before someone can be arrested or detained before someone can be
• The amendment is, the first of the amendments is simply increasing the notice requirement for a situation

Committee: Senate Judiciary B

Transcript Highlights:

• In addition to that, at the individual level, clients are already getting notices right now.
• Not official notices—it's kind of mass communications, general information.
• For the first cohort, the first notice will go out in July?
• We have to notice you. We have to make sure the system is set up.
• We have to notice you. We have to make sure the system is set up.

Summary: The Assembly Budget Subcommittee on Human Services held an informational hearing focused on the impacts of federal HR1 on CalFresh and Medi-Cal, along with related state mitigation efforts. CDSS, DHCS, DDS, county representatives, LAO, and Finance discussed automatic exemptions, data-sharing between departments, county workload, and the timing of implementation. CDSS said about two-thirds of adults ages 18 to 64 are already known to be exempt in CalFresh, and that administrative data matches could newly exempt about 200,000 of the roughly 955,000 adults potentially at risk. DHCS said Medi-Cal work requirements would begin in 2027 and the department is working to automate exemptions, including for IHSS recipients and some caregivers, while DDS said its population is expected to be covered by auto-exemptions. County welfare directors emphasized that individualized worker contact is critical, that counties need more staffing and stable funding, and that without it they expect delays, higher error rates, and reduced exemption screening capacity. Members pressed for written timelines, county-by-county impact data, and clearer guidance; the administration said it would provide follow-up materials and technical assistance. No votes were taken. The committee then heard a separate discussion on a proposed CFAP expansion or “CFAP Plus” concept to provide state-funded benefits to additional populations affected by HR1, including lawfully present non-citizens and ABODs. CDSS said implementation could not occur before October 1, 2027 because of policy and system-design constraints, and that adding unique eligibility rules would increase complexity and cost. Finance cautioned that any expansion would have General Fund impacts likely in the hundreds of millions to multiple billions. Members asked for cost estimates and technical feedback on trailer bill language, and CDSS said it would review the proposal and respond. The hearing also covered CDSS’s CalFresh strategic plan and mandated reporter training updates. CDSS said it is hiring a strategic plan lead to develop a long-term, data-informed CalFresh plan, and that the revised mandated reporter training is on track for launch in fall/winter 2026, ahead of the July 1, 2027 statutory deadline. The training will include updated content on structural racism, ICWA protections, implicit bias, and the distinction between reporting and supporting families. Members praised the work and asked for continued updates. Later panels focused on Promise Neighborhoods, Stop the Hate, and housing programs. Promise Neighborhood advocates and CDSS described the state’s prior $12 million investment, a positive evaluation showing roughly a 4-to-1 return, and a new proposal to support place-based partnerships and community schools through AB 1969. Stop the Hate grantees and CDSS reported that the program has provided direct services, prevention, and statewide coordination to millions of Californians, and urged reauthorization before funding expires; members asked for best-practice language and discussed focusing future funding on solidarity work, harm reduction, legal services, and education. Finally, CDSS presented on the CalWORKs Housing Support Program and Housing and Disability Advocacy Program, saying proposed General Fund investments of $105 million and $55 million would prevent funding cliffs and allow the programs to continue through 2026-27, while the absence of new funding would force reductions in housing assistance, subsidies, and enrollments.

Transcript Highlights:

• youth being transferred to the less restrictive program, whether a program has provided proof of notice
• youth being transferred to the less restrictive program, whether a program has provided proof of notice
• youth being transferred to the less restrictive program, whether a program has provided proof of notice
• But I noticed one thing going in: individuals in there were working really hard.
• So that gives notice to the D.A. To disclose their defense theory. So that gives notice to the D.A.

Committee: Senate Public Safety

Transcript Highlights:

• Thank you both for coming to testify on short notice. We are here at a...
• Thank you both for coming to testify on short notice.
• The meeting was called on 48 hours' notice. All right. I've been waiting two years.
• So not everybody could come on two days' notice. All right.
• That's when we put the notice out for Mr. Rothman's termination. I apologize.

Committee: Senate Senate Committee on Universities and Technical Colleges

Transcript Highlights:

• So we did provide advance notice, offer case management services, worked with families to address their
• And then we again provided notice to families in August just to again make sure that they were receiving
• in August um provided notice to families in August um just<00:20:33.840><c> to</c><00:20:34.159><c>
• >> Um, Madame Chair, um, since we provided notice to families in May, um, I think that we thought two
• So, we felt the time, which is why we gave them some advanced notice to make those plans several months