Video & Transcript Research : 'fiscal trigger'
Page 186 of 500
CO
Colorado 2026 Regular Session
Colorado House 2026 Legislative Day 108 Part 2 May 2nd, 2026
Colorado House Floor Meeting
Transcript Highlights:
- So, our fiscal note still expenditure.
- Not fiscal note dated today, May 1st.
- while I believe at this point our fiscal while I believe at this point our fiscal analyst<00:19:
- The analysis that was 1st fiscal note.
- Our first fiscal note was 140 million, I believe.
MN
Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session
Committee on Health and Human Services - 03/03/26
Health and Human Services
Transcript Highlights:
- state fiscal year. state fiscal year.
- This is as of fiscal year 26, so the current fiscal year.
- This is as of fiscal year 26, so the current fiscal year.
- This is as of fiscal year 26, so the current fiscal year.
- This is as of fiscal year 26, so the current fiscal year.
MN
Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session
House Higher Education Finance and Policy Committee 3/27/25
Higher Education Finance and Policy
Transcript Highlights:
- 56304 million in resources for fiscal 56304 million in resources for fiscal year year year 26<00
- If we focus on fiscal year 26, ...
- If we focus on fiscal year 26, the story is a little different because in fiscal year 26 State Grant
- two fiscal years.
- two fiscal years.
HI
Transcript Highlights:
- Yeah, Madam Chair, just to oversimplify: for fiscal years 2026, $565,000; fiscal year 2027, $3.365 million
- >
for <00:25:09.279>the $565,000 for fiscal year 27 for the $565,000 for fiscal year 27 - appropriates $2.8 $8 million for fiscal appropriates $2.8 $8 million for fiscal year<00:25:20.360
- <00:25:41.440>
years <00:25:41.840>26 for fiscal years 26 for fiscal years 26 565k< - /c><00:25:46.720>
in <00:25:46.880>the 565k fiscal year 27 3.365 in the 565k fiscal year
MN
Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session
Public Safety Committee Meeting - 2025-04-08
Public Safety Finance and Policy
Transcript Highlights:
- million in fiscal year 2028 and 2029.
- year 26 and an addition of $4,000 in fiscal year 26 and $7,000 in fiscal year 27.
- In fiscal year 26, and $336,000 in fiscal year 27.
- And on line 69, we add to that $18,000 in fiscal year 26 and $35,000 in fiscal year 27 for an operating
- That carries tails beginning in fiscal year 2020. And ongoing funds.
ND
Transcript Highlights:
- I do want to talk about the fiscal impact, but...
- I do want to talk about the fiscal impact, but if you don't mind, Mr.
- it's common with fiscal notes that there often is a bit of a range.
- It just says provide a fiscal impact.
- part of the fiscal note.
Summary:
The Legislative Management Committee met to fill a vacancy created by Representative Jared Hagert’s resignation, and the House majority recommended Representative Berg to replace him on the committee. The motion to appoint Berg was approved unanimously. The committee then took up its assigned task of estimating the fiscal impact of Initiated Constitutional Measure No. 3, the school meals measure, which would require public schools, and optionally nonpublic and tribal schools, to provide breakfast and lunch at no cost to students and reimburse schools through state funds after federal reimbursements are maximized.
Legislative Council’s Liz Fordall summarized the measure’s requirements and answered questions about implementation, including the 2027-28 start date, the measure’s interaction with the Legacy Earnings Fund, and the fact that the Legislature would still control the funding source. DPI’s Linnell Johnson then testified at length on current school meal programs, direct certification, CEP and Provision 2 participation, and likely behavioral changes if the measure passed. She estimated the biennial fiscal impact at $124 million to $134 million, with an additional roughly $300,000 in administrative costs, and explained that the estimate assumed higher participation and some schools shifting to CEP/Provision 2 to preserve federal reimbursements. She also noted that if no new applications were filed in non-CEP schools, the cost could be substantially higher.
After discussion, Senator Sorvaag moved to report a fiscal impact range of $124,300,000 to $134,300,000 per biennium to the Secretary of State, and the motion carried. The committee also received an informational update from Legislative Council attorney Dustin Richard on the ongoing redistricting litigation, explaining that the U.S. Supreme Court vacated the Eighth Circuit’s prior ruling and remanded the case for further consideration in light of Louisiana v. Callais, leaving the court-imposed map in effect for now. No action was required on that item, and the meeting adjourned after a brief note that the prior minutes would be brought back at a later meeting.
FL
Florida 2026 4th Special Session
January 13, 2026 - 01:00 PM
Transcript Highlights:
- Eason fiscal year 2030. 31 so outright decline.
- They're growing from 488,000, almost 489,000 in fiscal year, 26, 27 to 616,000 in fiscal year, 2030.
- districts receiving less fefp funds than in prior fiscal years.
- year 18, 19 and fiscal year. 25 26 as a point of clarification.
- And when we look at the column for fiscal year, 25 26.
WV
West Virginia 2026 Regular Session
WV Senate Finance Committee in Session Mar 12th, 2026 at 01:59 pm
Finance
Transcript Highlights:
- What is the fiscal note or impact of this? It's just shy of $8 million. Okay.
- The local fiscal body may terminate the contract at any time upon 30 days' notice, and local fiscal bodies
- documentation of material fiscal savings to the body.
- The fiscal note, Mr.
- The fiscal note, Mr.
NH
Transcript Highlights:
- Second. fiscal and request for more winter fiscal and request for more winter maintenance<00:32:07.200
- be asking for more money in fiscal. be asking for more money in fiscal.
- fiscal fiscal this<00:32:32.399>
winter <00:32:33.200>time, <00:32:34.080>we <00 - It's committee to close fiscal year 25.
- <01:06:49.920>
year a dollar appropriation in fiscal year a dollar appropriation in fiscal
NV
Transcript Highlights:
- James Malone, LCB Fiscal, for the record.
- year 2026 to fiscal year 2027.
- year 2026 would be reduced to $4 million in fiscal year 2026, but then an additional $5 million in fiscal
- million each fiscal year over the next biennium.
- year 2026 to $400,000 in fiscal year 2026.
CA
California 2025-2026 Regular Session
Assembly Budget Subcommittee No. 5 on State Administration Apr 22nd, 2025
Transcript Highlights:
- Yeah, this particular fiscal year is a full year of project execution.
- is, because most people don't know what fiscal is.
- migrated to Fiscal.
- With that, is anybody from the public that wants to speak on Fiscal?
- I'm a fiscal analyst there.
Summary:
The Assembly Budget Subcommittee No. 5 heard updates from the Secretary of State, EDD, the State Controller’s Office, CalHR, and DGS on a range of budget proposals and federal policy impacts. Secretary of State Shirley Weber opened with remarks about California’s election system, emphasizing its safety, transparency, high voter registration and vote-by-mail participation, and the office’s response to bomb threats and other election threats. Her staff then presented funding requests for the Cal-Access Replacement System (CARS) and Help America Vote Act/VoteCal activities, describing them as needed to modernize campaign finance and lobbying disclosure systems and maintain election security and voter services.
A major portion of the hearing focused on federal election policy, especially the potential effects of a presidential executive order and the SAVE Act. Secretary of State staff said California would face significant, potentially unquantifiable costs if forced to comply, including new burdens on county recorders, county election offices, and the Secretary of State’s office, and warned of voter disenfranchisement, especially for students, seniors, disabled voters, military and overseas voters, rural residents, and people with limited transportation. Members and public commenters strongly opposed the federal proposals and argued California’s current system is functioning well. The committee also heard that federal HAVA funds were not expected to be at risk because the state draws them down into an interest-bearing account.
EDD reported on paid family leave, explaining that recent delays were tied to a system transition and increased claim volume, and said it was simplifying applications and adding staff and automation. Public testimony supported expanding paid family leave to chosen family. EDD also said it is prepared for possible unemployment spikes, citing a recession plan, a command center, and recent hiring. The State Controller’s Office requested funding to continue the Fiscal migration project, which would move the state’s accounting book of record to the new system by July 1, 2026; Finance and LAO had no objections, and the committee expressed support for the project’s progress.
CalHR presented a proposal for a statewide recruitment, outreach, and education paid media campaign under AB 1511, saying its current advertising budget is too small to reach diverse communities effectively. The final item addressed Governor Newsom’s executive order requiring a return to office on a four-day schedule. CalHR and DGS said they were working department-by-department to assess space, parking, transit, and other logistics, but had not completed a statewide cost analysis. Members and many public commenters criticized the order, arguing it was rushed, costly, harmful to telework benefits, and potentially disruptive to workers, especially those with disabilities, caregiving responsibilities, or long commutes. No votes were taken during the hearing.
TX
Transcript Highlights:
- There is a fiscal and policy issue about staffing and retention.
- So we are still administratively attached to TDLR until the end of fiscal year 2027. the end of the fiscal
- been collected in the past three fiscal years combined.
- They have requested unexpended balance authority between fiscal year 2025 and fiscal year 2026 for these
- Moving to page three, Selected Fiscal and Policy Issues.
NH
New Hampshire 2026 Regular Session
House Finance Division III (04/20/2026)
Transcript Highlights:
- the majority of the members of Fiscal. the majority of the members of Fiscal.
- As I just mentioned, uh the Fiscal<00:39:10.560>
Committee Fiscal Committee Fiscal Committee can - I'm a member of the Fiscal<00:39:21.040>
Committee. Fiscal Committee. Fiscal Committee. - Fiscal Committee. Fiscal Committee.
- Fiscal Committee, I would imagine. Fiscal Committee, I would imagine.
Summary:
Division Three of the Finance Committee met in work session on April 20, 2026, to consider Senate Bills 481, 603, and 663, with the discussion focused primarily on SB 481, relative to the sale of the Sununu Youth Services Center property. The chair explained that the bill was advisory only and that the committee’s recommendations would go to full Finance on April 27. For SB 481, members reviewed conflicting provisions in the prior budget law about whether sale proceeds should go to the general fund or the Youth Development Center Claims and Administration Settlement Fund, and the bill was described as a compromise that would direct proceeds to the general fund before June 30, 2027, and to the settlement fund after that date. It was noted that the settlement fund had originally received about $20 million and had roughly $10 million remaining.
The committee also received an extensive update from DCYF Director Marie Noonan on the new Youth Development Center in Hampstead. She reported that construction remained on schedule, with major structural and interior work complete, substantial completion expected in late summer or early fall 2026, and occupancy anticipated in early 2027. The presentation highlighted the facility’s design features, including single-occupancy bedrooms, sensory rooms, an education wing, medical and clinical suites, visitation space, a gym, and multiple outdoor courtyards, all intended to support a trauma-informed setting. Members asked about the facility’s funding, square footage, fencing, and scanner; staff said the building is about 34,000 square feet, funded entirely with federal ARPA state recovery funds to date, and that the scanner is on site but not yet operational pending policy and staff training.
Committee members also raised concerns about the facility’s design and security. In response, DCYF said some concrete walls are required for structural and safety reasons, but they are being painted to maintain a brighter environment, and that the fencing will be about 15 feet high with privacy netting because the campus is shared with Hampstead. Officials said the new facility is legislatively limited to a maximum of 12 youth, while the current center can house 12 to 18, and emphasized that courts ultimately determine placements. No votes or final actions were taken during the work session.
MA
Massachusetts 2025-2026 Regular Session
Senate Session Jun 21st, 2026 at 01:00 pm
Massachusetts Senate Floor Meeting
Transcript Highlights:
- As we move closer to adopting a budget for the fiscal year, which will begin very, very shortly.
- Today, we will be considering the conference committee report on the fiscal year 2026 budget.
- year for which this budget covers, fiscal year 2026.
- year for which this budget covers, fiscal year 2026.
- I know how much he focuses on these issues and how much he focuses on fiscal discipline.
Summary:
The Senate first took up and passed several House bills establishing sick leave banks, including House 4182 for a Massachusetts Department of Transportation employee and House 1590 for Eric J. Awaniak. It also advanced and then enacted House 4237, a fiscal year 2026 appropriations bill providing interim funding before final action on the general appropriations act. During the session, Senator Collins also recognized Chaplain Clementina Cherry of the Lewis D. Brown Peace Institute as a distinguished guest, with remarks entered into the record.
The main business was the conference committee report on the fiscal year 2026 state budget, House 4001/House 4240. Senate Ways and Means leadership described the budget as balanced, on time, and fiscally responsible, with $61.01 billion in spending, no new taxes or fees, and a $33 million deposit to the stabilization fund. They highlighted major investments in Chapter 70 school aid, special education circuit breaker reimbursements, unrestricted local aid, MassEducate, universal free school meals, MBTA and regional transit funding, MassHealth, food security, and mental health services. The report also included policy items such as broker fee responsibility, fare-free regional transit, housing studies, a gold star family annuity provision, and a crumbling concrete commission.
Minority leader Senator Tarr and others questioned the spending reductions, use of one-time funds, and the treatment of excess capital gains, arguing for greater fiscal caution and concern about future federal actions and long-term spending growth. Supporters responded that the reductions reflected revenue uncertainty, federal policy risks, and the need to preserve budget stability, while using some one-time sources to balance the plan. The conference report was adopted by a roll call vote of 38-2, the emergency preamble for House 4240 was approved by standing vote, and the FY26 general appropriations bill was then enacted and sent to the Governor. The Senate also adopted an order to dispense with printing a calendar for the next session and adjourned until Thursday at 11 a.m.
MN
Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session
Hied Committee Meeting - 2026-03-26
Higher Education Finance and Policy
Transcript Highlights:
- <00:04:39.640>
note couldn't get an updated fiscal note couldn't get an updated fiscal note - fiscal note. Is that correct? fiscal note. Is that correct?
- So, in looking at the fiscal note, the fiscal note does no longer matches the bill.
- It has a fiscal note from OHE.
- OHE cuz it's about the fiscal note. OHE cuz it's about the fiscal note.
Keywords:
undocumented, financial aid, state policy, higher education, noncitizen eligibility, state grants, college affordability, Office of Higher Education, Minnesota State Grant, need analysis, expected family contribution, student aid, grant formula, living and miscellaneous expense allowance, dependent student, independent student, parental contribution, student contribution, surplus appropriation, biennium
NH
New Hampshire 2025 Regular Session
Fiscal Committee (03/21/2025)
Transcript Highlights:
- Crazy being after 10 o'clock, I will call to order the Friday, March 21st, 2025 meeting of the Fiscal
- 21st, 2025 meeting of the fiscal 21st, 2025 meeting of the fiscal committee<00:04:26.000>
and - Fiscal Committee is coming back from close session, and Senator Gray is recognized.
- fiscal 2020. 25 through June 30th, 2025. fiscal 2020. 25 through June 30th, 2025.
- But 11 o'clock fiscal on Friday the 18th. Good Friday fiscal. All right.
Summary:
The Fiscal Committee met on March 21, 2025, accepted the February 21 minutes, and approved a shortened consent calendar after removing Department of Safety item 2565 for separate discussion. That item concerned drone/UAS detection for special events and critical infrastructure. Department staff said the system would help locate drones and operators and support enforcement around temporary flight restrictions, but members pressed them on privacy versus security, and the department acknowledged the issue was primarily about security. The committee ultimately approved the item after discussion.
Members also approved Department of Transportation item 2572 after a question about whether increased transfer requests would affect paving; DOT said the paving program would continue as normal. Judicial Council items 2566 and 2567 were also approved without discussion. During informational items, members asked for follow-up on Fish and Game’s Hike Safe card revenues versus search-and-rescue costs, and on DHHS reporting issues, including nursing home bed counts and declining community mental health center client numbers; DHHS said it would verify the bed-count methodology and provide a written update on the mental health data.
The committee then entered non-public session to discuss an ongoing legal matter and related funding process. After returning, it considered a request under RSA 21-M:11 for an additional $5 million general fund appropriation for fiscal year 2025. Several members said they would have preferred the full $15 million request, but supported the smaller amount as a temporary step during the budget process, with expectations of monthly reporting back to the committee. The motion to approve $5 million passed 6-3. The committee set its next meeting for Friday, April 18 at 11:00 a.m. and adjourned.
MN
Transcript Highlights:
- Uh, the second column is the amount, so service in fiscal beginning in fiscal service in fiscal beginning
- million in fiscal year 28, and about $10.9 million in fiscal year 29.
- for fiscal year 26.
- It's 245,000 in fiscal year 27, 501,000 in fiscal year 28, and then 589,000 in fiscal year 29.
- Just for fiscal year 26. Just for fiscal year 26.
Summary:
The Senate Finance Committee took up Senate File 203, a broad housing bill authored by Senator Port. Port described the measure as a package including $50 million in housing infrastructure bonds, MHFA administrative and investment reforms, expanded Greater Minnesota infrastructure grants for workforce housing, manufactured housing bill of rights provisions, and a private equity restriction on large investors buying certain single-family homes starting in 2026. Fiscal analyst Eric Olafson walked through the spreadsheet and said the $50 million bond authorization would add debt service costs over time, with the total estimated debt service for that authorization at about $75.8 million. Senator Draheim raised concern about the growing cost of bonding and said the state should rely more on cash than debt.
The committee then adopted two technical amendments. The A21 amendment, described by Port as correcting manufactured housing bill of rights language, aligning MHFA board meeting language, conforming a lived-experience exemption to federal law, and fixing a capacity-building grants reference, was approved without objection. The A20 amendment, offered by Draheim, was also adopted and would give the legislature more control and visibility over MHFA funding and how quickly program dollars are reinvested after agency operations.
Members then debated Draheim’s A22 amendment, which would delete the manufactured home park provisions from the bill. Draheim and several Republicans argued the section could function like rent control, could burden good park owners, and might have unintended consequences for park operations and purchases. Port, Senator Boldon’s allies, and other supporters said the provisions were needed to protect residents from rent spikes and private equity abuses in manufactured home communities, where residents own their homes but not the land. The transcript ends during that debate, before any final disposition on A22 or the bill itself is shown.
MN
Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session
House Workforce, Labor, and Economic Development Finance and Policy Committee 3/6/25
Workforce, Labor, and Economic Development Finance and Policy
Transcript Highlights:
- There's no fiscal cost to this bill.
- There's no fiscal cost to this bill.
- There's no fiscal cost to this bill.
- There's no fiscal cost to this bill.
- There's no fiscal cost to this bill.
Keywords:
nursing home, employment standards, worker rights, Minnesota Statutes, labor compensation, workforce development, job training, economic stability, low-income, career pathways, education funding, Summit Academy, employment, STEM programming, GED preparation, Neighborhood Development Center, NDC, small business, entrepreneurship, business training
MN
Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session
House Workforce, Labor, and Economic Development Finance and Policy Committee 2/13/25 - Part 2
Workforce, Labor, and Economic Development Finance and Policy
Transcript Highlights:
- you heard in earlier I asked for fiscal you heard in earlier I asked for fiscal notes<01:03:47.440
- <01:03:52.960>
return workable I never got a fiscal return workable I never got a fiscal return - If we need a fiscal on this, they've had it.
- be a very straightforward easy fiscal be a very straightforward easy fiscal note<01:18:39.239>
- vote with no understanding the fiscal vote with no understanding the fiscal impact<01:20:17.760>
MN
Transcript Highlights:
- I'm Christa Boyd, Transportation fiscal analyst.
- So right now, in fiscal year 26, it's 5.5% of the sales tax.
- there's a slight decrease under fiscal there's a slight decrease under fiscal year<00:36:56.560>
- <00:37:46.640>
year that if you look at fiscal year that if you look at fiscal year 27<00: - changes um would that have a fiscal changes um would that have a fiscal impact<00:47:40.240>