Transcript Highlights:

• Bill 1110 is a bill for an act to amend and reenact Section 49-10.1-14 of the North Dakota Century Code
• Chapter 49-02 of the North Dakota Century Code, relating to Public Service Commission requirements for
• and reenact Section 12.1-22-03 and subsection 1 of Section 12.1-22-06 of the North Dakota Century Code
• Of Section 12.1-22.06 of the North Dakota Century Code, relating to criminal trespass, and to provide
• But now we have something in code that we can all of a sudden change this.

Keywords: 908, all

Summary: The North Dakota House convened with prayer, roll call, and recognition of guests and student visitors, then moved through a long calendar of resolutions and bills. Early in the session, members honored Mandan High School’s e-sports team for state championships and recognized House Minority Leader Zachary Ista’s birthday. The House then passed HCR 3037 unanimously, urging mandatory reporting requirements for public officials, after committee support and remarks emphasizing accountability in public office. The chamber then considered numerous Senate amendments and final-passage votes on bills covering ambulance service grants (HB 1597), Public Service Commission records and open meetings (HB 1110 and HB 1063), squatter/trespass law (HB 1305), nonconforming structures in local governments (HB 1500), academic tenure policy (HB 1437), retirement eligibility for correctional officers and state radio dispatchers (HB 1274 and HB 1419), a Medicaid dental study (HB 1567), above-ground fuel storage tank regulation (HB 1058), gaming site authorization procedures (HB 1615), an oil extraction tax incentive outside the Bakken and Three Forks formations (HB 1483), and simple assault protections for hospital workers (HB 1341). Most of these measures passed, though HB 1231, which would have created a study on early discontinuation of sex offender registration, failed on final passage. A major point of debate was Senate Bill 2354, which would restrict student use of personal electronic devices during the school day in public and nonpublic schools, with exceptions for medical and special education needs and annual reporting on impacts. Supporters argued it would improve focus, behavior, and mental health, while opponents raised concerns about private-school regulation, logistics, liability, and duplication with a similar bill. The House passed SB 2354, and also passed SB 2112, which temporarily authorizes the Life Skills and Transition Center to serve certain non-eligible youth in crisis, despite objections that the facility should remain focused on developmental disabilities and concerns about repeating past institutional problems. The House also debated and rejected HB 1300 on legislative term limits after extensive discussion about whether the Senate’s date change altered the effect of the voter-approved measure. The session ended with announcements, committee notices, and adjournment until April 8, 2025.

Transcript Highlights:

• It's already in the code. It's area level six.
• That crime that's in this bill is already currently in the code as a level six felony.
• And we chose to write now another definition of the same crime and put it in the code.
• to try to redo our code.
• the code for the same crime.

Keywords: 964, all

Transcript Highlights:

• Arkansas Code 25-16-902. That's Exhibit C in your packet.
• They'll be created somewhere in the Arkansas Code and then also created in Title 19.
• They'll be created somewhere in the Arkansas Code and then also created in Title 19.
• I'm trying to look at how the uniform code reads.
• Anything else from the code reviser? Oh, sir.

Keywords: 1204, all

Transcript Highlights:

• Under North Dakota Century Code 61-04 and Administrative Code 89-03, it directs how the DWR is to administer
• Like I said, Century Code lays out, Process.
• "The Century Code lays out the purpose of the program.
• And really, just parts of the Century Code are silent.
• The other elements of the tax code can wait.

Keywords: 908, all

Transcript Highlights:

• It's also a building codes issue, etc., etc.
• Building codes. Uh, quick story there.
• Next slide, please. the existing codes. Next slide, please.
• , Um again focusing on building codes, Um again focusing on building codes, land<00:27:09.120>
• ,<01:03:05.599> but with that clear and concise code, but with that clear and concise code

Keywords: 958, all

Summary: The interim task force on disaster prevention and resiliency met for its fourth meeting and focused heavily on insurance markets, affordability, and mitigation. Cochairs noted they are working toward recommendations for a later fall meeting. The main presentation came from David Snyder of the American Property Casualty Insurance Association, who said the insurance industry sees itself as part of the problem and part of the solution because it ultimately pays for losses created by natural conditions, development choices, and construction practices. Snyder described rising losses from natural catastrophes, inflation-driven increases in rebuilding and repair costs, more development in disaster-prone areas, wildfire exposure, severe convective storms, hail, and roof damage. He argued that Kentucky should avoid the mistakes he attributed to California, where regulatory responses contributed to a strained insurance market and greater reliance on the FAIR Plan. He said Kentucky’s private market appears to be functioning better, with relatively few FAIR Plan policies, and urged lawmakers to preserve that market through risk-based rates and policies that do not worsen availability. He recommended a broad mitigation strategy involving stronger building codes, land-use decisions, stormwater infrastructure, public access to risk data, and incentives for resilient construction. He highlighted programs such as the Insurance Institute for Business and Home Safety, fortified-home standards, wildfire-prepared community practices, and examples from Alabama, Louisiana, and Florida showing that mitigation can produce quick returns and insurance discounts. He also suggested catastrophe savings accounts, flexible coverage options, and a whole-of-government approach that includes the insurance department, building-code agencies, first responders, FEMA, NFIP, and NOAA. In questions, a legislator asked about the prognosis if carriers continue exiting markets and if nothing is done to address affordability and accessibility. Snyder said he could not predict market exits but stressed that regulators should monitor the market closely, use available data, and focus on loss prevention and mitigation. He said insurers want to do business in Kentucky and that the long-term solution is coordinated action among public and private stakeholders to reduce risk and keep coverage available.

Transcript Highlights:

• Members, Senate File 571 deals with the Uniform Trust Code and the Uniform Probate Code, which I know
• of related changes to the probate code.
• <00:19:46.880> the elements of the revised trust code the elements of the revised trust code
• , powers of appointment, and the Uniform Probate Code.
• Senator Miller votes aye. uniform probate code third uniform probate code third reading<00:21:28.600>

Keywords: 1187, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• Next, we're going to Senator Burgess, tab 6, CS for SB 504 on code inspector body cameras.
• Next, we're going to Senator Burgess, tab 6, CS for SB 504 on code inspector body cameras.
• Does this include conversations with the tenant who may be reporting a landlord for code violations?
• Does this include conversations with the tenant who may be reporting a landlord for code violations?
• Take up tab 7, SB 506 on public records, body camera recordings recorded by a code inspector.

Summary: The Committee on Rules met and first approved several open-government sunset repeal bills and related measures. SB 7024 and SB 7026, both sponsored by Senator Mayfield, were explained as consolidating and extending public records/public meetings exemptions for cybersecurity information and trade secrets held by agencies; both were reported favorably. SB 7020, sponsored by Senator Trumbull, reenacted an aquaculture records exemption for records held by the Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services and was also reported favorably. Later, the committee approved SB 14 and SB 24, claims bills for relief involving Miami-Dade County, and SB 16, a claims bill for Heriberto Sanchez Mayan against the City of St. Petersburg; all were reported favorably without opposition. The committee also approved CS for SB 806, a consumer right-to-repair bill creating portable wireless device and agricultural equipment repair acts, despite opposition from several industry groups, and reported it favorably.

Transcript Highlights:

• Arkansas Code 25-16-902.
• I saw code is going to spend $150 to $200 for those replacement volumes.
• They'll be created somewhere in the Arkansas Code and then also created in Title 19.
• I'm trying to look at how the uniform code reads.
• Anything else from the Code Revisor?

Summary: The commission approved the prior meeting minutes and then adopted the annual authorization for expense reimbursement for commissioners under Arkansas Code 25-16-902. Members noted that legislative commissioners would not receive reimbursement for the meeting day itself, consistent with their understanding of legislative per diem rules. The commission next considered LexisNexis pricing and replacement volume proposals. Company representatives proposed roughly a 7% price increase, citing higher costs and the Producer Price Index, and recommended replacing three volumes in 2026 and four in 2027 based on supplement size and age. Members asked about pricing for the public, the criteria for selecting replacement volumes, and the number of state sets sold. LexisNexis said the state pricing was tied to the public price structure and explained that replacement decisions are driven by keeping supplements manageable and volumes current. The commission approved the pricing and replacement volumes. Senator Tucker also raised the possibility of a statewide legal research contract for circuit judges, and LexisNexis said it would connect him with its sales team. Staff then updated the commission on the funds codification project. They reported reviewing state treasury funds and identifying many that are codified in more than one place, with the goal of moving the technical creation language into Title 19 only and repealing duplicative language elsewhere. The project is intended for inclusion in a fall technical corrections bill, after coordination with BLR Fiscal and DFA. Members discussed whether obsolete funds could also be identified for possible cleanup legislation, and staff said DFA maintains a list of obsolete funds and that any such information could be incorporated into future technical corrections work. The commission concluded by noting that no further business was expected before a later fall meeting to review technical corrections, and then adjourned.

Transcript Highlights:

• What we're going to do is go back and just see if there's duplicative portions of the code or if there's
• obsolete portions of the code or portions of the code that do not have statutory authority, have the
• place a process to where we're going to do some processing between the statute, the administrative code
• It can put, say, OK, this statute goes with this code.
• Then we can go back and read that statute and verify that it goes with the code.

Bills: HJR1088, SB1280, SB1316, SB1433, SB1455, SB1456, SB1457, SB1459, SB1461, SB1463, SB1465, SB1466, SB1721

Keywords: education rules, administrative rules, joint resolution, Oklahoma State Department of Education, higher education, State Regents for Higher Education, Teachers' Retirement System, charter schools, Statewide Charter School Board, career and technology education, CTE, OEQA, rule approval, legislative oversight, permanent rules, school governance, teacher retirement, education agencies, excise tax, oil tax

Transcript Highlights:

• Then on the last page, uh, here is where we cover, um, the codes, so current codes and then codes to
• Then on the last page, uh, here is where we cover, um, the codes, so current codes and then codes to
• Then on the last page, uh, here is where we cover, um, the codes, so current codes and then codes to
• National Electric Code. National Electric Code.
• code is part of the state building code. code is part of the state building code.

Keywords: 1191, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• Beginning with STR 48 SD 1, requesting the Office of the Governor, State Building Code Council, building
• Beginning with STR 48 SD 1, requesting the Office of the Governor, State Building Code Council, building
• <00:01:58.479> Chair<00:01:58.960> for<00:01:59.320> the updated building codes
• Chair for the updated building codes. Chair for the testimony,<00:02:00.880> please.
• , governor, state of state building code, governor, state of state building code, council,<00:10:

Keywords: 910, house, all

Summary: The Committee on Housing heard two resolutions. STR 48 SD 1 called for a comprehensive strategy to adopt updated building codes, with testimony listed from several groups but no one appeared to testify. The committee later deferred the measure, noting it was very similar to House Concurrent Resolution 67 House Draft 1. The committee then took up STR 6D1, which urges the Hawaii Housing Finance and Development Corporation to develop a plan to produce enough housing to meet state demand. HHFDC testified that the resolution misstated the scope of low-income housing tax credit units and emphasized that the state’s housing need is much larger than previously cited, with a recent study showing about 33,000 units needed for households at or below 60% AMI statewide. HHFDC supported planning but said any plan must be realistic and account for private land constraints. A member raised concerns about rising leasehold costs and affordability for homeowners, and HHFDC responded that rental affordability can be maintained more readily than for-sale housing. The committee adopted HHFDC’s proposed amendments to STR 6D1, including deleting a clause about overbuilding, revising the shortage figures, and adding language referencing Senate Bill 26 and the affordable housing land inventory task force. The committee also amended the resolution to focus on density and timing of development for projects identified by that task force. The measure passed with amendments, and the meeting adjourned.

Transcript Highlights:

• Code to really figure out exactly how that state conforms.
• So it references the Internal Revenue Code Section 62.
• The Internal Revenue Code contains around 3 million words. That's a lot.
• Okay, so then on the next page, the Internal Revenue Code sections 224 and 63B.
• We need to get away from dollars and cents in the tax code.

Transcript Highlights:

• homes are built to a federal HUD code homes are built to a federal HUD code which<00:42:55.760><
• non-code area a private or the state so non-code area a private or the state so one<01:11:26.520>
• Building Code uh to comply with as far Building Code uh to comply with as far as<01:15:05.239> the
• <01:15:17.600> um so it's it's not the same code um so it's it's not the same code um modifying
• These homes are a part of the State Building Code.

Keywords: 1187, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• to the Business and Professions Code.
• Furthermore, there are valid concerns that transferring code provisions from the Health and Safety Code
• and Insurance Code to the Business and Professions Code could inadvertently create harmful roadblocks
• Code.
• Health and Safety Code.

Summary: The Assembly Health Committee heard several bills focused on health care access, oversight, and affordability. The first major item was SB 306 by Senator Becker, a prior authorization reform bill. Becker and supporters, including the California Medical Association and California Hospital Association, argued that prior authorization delays care, adds administrative burden, and can lead to serious patient harm. The bill was substantially amended late in the process to have DMHC and CDI identify services and drugs to exempt from prior authorization based on utilization data, with safeguards for fraud, waste, abuse, and patient safety. Health plans and insurers opposed the measure as written, saying prior authorization remains an important utilization-management tool and raising concerns about the 90% threshold, drug inclusion, and how modifications are counted. The committee also heard SB 35 by Senator Umberg, which would let cities or counties inspect unlicensed sober living homes if DHCS does not act promptly on complaints. Supporters said the bill would address weak enforcement and protect residents, while one behavioral health directors group opposed it unless amended. Members generally supported the measure, citing problems with unlicensed facilities and the need for local enforcement backup. The committee then heard SB 62, which would codify California’s updated essential health benefits benchmark if approved by the federal government. Senator Wiener said the package would add hearing aids, durable medical equipment, and infertility treatment including IVF, acknowledging that premiums could rise but arguing the benefits were worth it. Health Access California and other advocates supported the bill, while the California Family Council opposed it. The committee also took up SB 596 by Senator Menjivar, which would tighten the rules for hospitals claiming an on-call list as a defense to nurse staffing ratio penalties. Supporters, including nurses and SEIU, said hospitals have used vague or ineffective on-call practices to avoid accountability and that the bill would improve enforcement and patient safety. Hospital groups opposed it, arguing that staffing is highly dynamic, that hospitals need flexibility to manage acuity and emergencies, and that the bill could increase costs and interfere with collective bargaining arrangements. Finally, the committee heard SB 40 by Senator Wiener, the Insulin Affordability Act, which would cap insulin copays at $35 for a 30-day supply and restrict step therapy unless a plan covers at least one insulin in each drug type. Supporters, including physicians, diabetes advocates, nurses, students, and patient groups, said insulin is life-saving and too often unaffordable, forcing patients to ration or choose between medication and basic needs. There was no formal opposition testimony, though one member questioned why insulin remains so expensive. The committee also began discussion of SB 363, but the transcript cuts off before that bill’s full presentation or any action on the measures. No votes are recorded in the portion provided, and several bills were noted as consent items earlier in the hearing.

Transcript Highlights:

• We corrected some of the code terminology so that we believe it is code-compliant language.
• The primary function is to direct the Building Code Review Board to amend the existing code.
• comp all code compliant is code comp all code compliant language. language. language.
• review board to amend the existing code review board to amend the existing code.<01:39:41.280> A<
• A delayed effective date is code.

Keywords: 1189, house, all

Transcript Highlights:

• The lawsuit against the Orange County Fair revealed that the Public Contract Code competitive bidding
• The Public Contract Code was written to guard against favoritism and promote fair competition.
• that it did not apply the Public Contract Code.
• And if it was in the Ag Code and not explicit, it's an error.
• And if it was in the Ag Code and not explicit, it's an error.

Keywords: 987, senate, all

Summary: The Senate Committee on Agriculture met with a quorum on Agriculture Day at the Capitol. One item, SB 1410 by Senator Alvarado-Gil, was pulled, leaving SB 1223 by Senator Padilla as the only bill heard. SB 1223 would require state and county fairs to use competitive bidding standards for contracts and prohibit sole-source contracting, closing what the author described as a loophole in the Public Contract Code that has allowed favoritism and noncompetitive awards at fairs. Senator Padilla and his witness, attorney John Mute, cited investigative reporting and litigation involving the San Diego and Orange County fairs as evidence of corruption and manipulated bidding processes. They argued that fair contracts are significant public expenditures and should be subject to the same transparency and competition rules as other state contracts. No opposition testimony was presented. Committee members expressed support, describing the bill as a needed correction to unclear law and a safeguard against abuse. The committee voted to move SB 1223 to the Senate Appropriations Committee; the roll call showed four votes in favor, with the bill placed on call for the absent member before the meeting adjourned.

Transcript Highlights:

• The lawsuit against the Orange County Fair revealed that the Public Contract Code competitive bidding
• The Public Contract Code was written to guard against favoritism and promote fair competition.
• that it did not apply the Public Contract Code.
• And if it was in the Ag Code and not explicit, it's an error.
• And if it was in the Ag Code and not explicit, it's an error.

Summary: The Senate Committee on Agriculture met with a quorum and heard one bill, SB 1223 by Senator Padilla, after SB 1410 was pulled from the agenda. SB 1223 would require state and county fairs to use competitive bidding standards for contracts and prohibit sole-source contracting. The author and witness argued the bill was needed to close loopholes in the Public Contract Code after media reports and lawsuits alleged corruption and manipulated contract awards at certain fairs, including allegations that RFPs were written to favor a single bidder. No witnesses testified in opposition. Committee members expressed support, describing the issue as a matter of transparency and proper state contracting. A motion was made to pass the bill to the Appropriations Committee. The committee voted 4-0 in favor, with the bill placed on call for the absent member before the meeting concluded.

Transcript Highlights:

• Calendar item 50 is House Bill 4072, a bill to amend the Public Health Code.
• Dorocet-Hale's Single State Construction Code Act. The bill was discharged.
• Madam Chair, House Bill 4309 is a bill to amend the Public Health Code.
• Madam Chair, House Bill 5807 is a bill to amend the Insurance Code of 1996.
• Madam Chair, House Bill 4779 is a bill to amend the Public Health Code.

Summary: The Senate convened with an invocation, pledge, attendance, and a series of recesses and caucus calls. The chamber also recognized the retirement of Larry Horn of the Michigan Senate Police Department and later honored departing staff members Macy Maine, Maddie Cutler, and Julia Schmidt. Senator Geiss delivered a statement marking the 62nd anniversary of the Civil Rights Act, emphasizing its legacy and the need to protect and strengthen civil rights protections. The Senate received House messages on Senate Bills 870 and 878, with SB 878 sent to conference. It also introduced several new measures, including Senate Joint Resolution L and Senate Bills 1085 through 1091, plus House Bills 4833, 5152, 5153, and 5727, referring them to the appropriate committees. The chamber discharged multiple committees from further consideration of bills and suspended rules several times to move legislation onto the General Orders calendar and to allow committee meetings during session. On the floor, the Senate passed House Bill 4072 and Senate Bills 792, 793, 1013, and 947. SB 1013, dealing with the Insurance Code and price optimization, included a failed Tice amendment and passed 34-3. SB 947, concerning dam safety under the Natural Resources and Environmental Protection Act, drew supportive remarks from Senator McMorrow and a strong no-vote explanation from Senator McBroom before passing 22-15. The Senate also adopted a McMorrow substitute for SB 947 and later considered a large group of bills in Committee of the Whole, reporting many with amendments and others without amendment for third reading. The session ended with the Senate adjourning until Friday, July 3rd at 12:15 a.m.

Transcript Highlights:

• <00:01:16.040> sections being and just have the code sections being and just have the code
• just the code language as of now. just the code language as of now.
• . code. code.
• There are two different legislative subpoena code sections in current law.
• subpoena code sections in current<00:15:49.280> law.

Keywords: Accountability, Efficiency, Transparency - Room 210, 3 March, 2026; 2:30 P.M., 925, all

Summary: The committee first took up House Bill 1596, which Senator Johnson explained as a companion to another crypto-kiosk bill. He said the measure was being used to open the code and remove new kiosk language temporarily while lawmakers work on a regulatory framework for crypto kiosks, which are being used in scams involving callers posing as law enforcement and directing victims to deposit cash into kiosks. Members discussed the lack of reporting and registration data, the estimated number of kiosks in the state, and whether regulation might require identification and registration of the devices. The committee adopted the motion for title sufficient, do pass as amended, and reported the bill out. The committee then considered House Bill 859, which would eliminate the in-person absentee voting envelope while keeping the 45-day in-person absentee voting period and existing excuse requirements. Senator England said voters would still complete an affidavit and cast the ballot directly into an OMR machine, and he noted that circuit clerks preferred this version. The committee asked a few clarifying questions and then passed the bill, reporting it out. Next was House Bill 925, the CLEAR Act, which Senator McMahan described as a revised PEER-related bill that had been worked on with the governor’s office after a prior veto. He outlined provisions creating a PEER review program for agency rules, Medicaid transportation evaluations, a State Board of Health Professions, changes to the corporation work initiative program, and PEER subpoena and enforcement language. An amendment was adopted to delete the subpoena-related sections that had raised constitutional concerns and to retain the reverse repealer. After questions about the advisory role of the new board, the committee passed the bill as amended. The committee also heard House Bill 1171, a strike-all that Senator Sparks said would mirror a Senate bill on grant transparency. The measure would require clearer grant objectives, objective eligibility criteria, disclosure of conflicts and board relationships, reporting by grantees and subgrantees, and signed documentation under penalty of perjury with CPA review. Members asked about enforcement, and Senator Sparks said improper reporting could lead to loss of funds, audits, and possible criminal consequences. The committee adopted the strike-all and reported the bill out. Finally, the committee considered House Bill 1393, which would create an energy development fund at the Mississippi Development Authority for long-term infrastructure planning tied to large industrial energy users. Members asked whether the fund would cover water resources as well as electricity; the sponsor said it was intended for energy infrastructure, not water, and was aimed at large industrial projects such as steel mills. The committee adopted the strike-all and moved to report the bill out.

Transcript Highlights:

• Delete the proposed criminal penalties in proposed Section 1507 of the Elections Code.
• Delete Section 5 of the bill, which proposed to add Section 15104.5 to the Elections Code. clarify that
• sections 1553 and to the Elections Code.
• Will be brought back into Sections 18544 and 18545 of the Elections Code.
• The code provides a six-month retention period where ballots are secured.

Keywords: 988, house, all

Summary: The Assembly Elections Committee met on May 6, 2026, with a quorum present and took up one measure, SB 73 by Senator Svantez. The author described the bill as an urgency measure intended to strengthen protections around California elections, including restrictions on law enforcement or military presence at voting locations, protections for ballots and voting equipment, and limits on access to election materials. The chair also outlined a set of agreed-upon amendments, including removing a section to avoid conflict with AB 1664, deleting proposed criminal penalties in one section, clarifying language on vote-by-mail signature challenges, and refining provisions related to law enforcement support and certified voting technology. Supporters, including AAPI Force and CHIRLA, argued the bill was needed to protect voters from intimidation and to safeguard election administration from interference, citing concerns about immigration enforcement at polling places and the Riverside County sheriff’s seizure of ballots. Additional supporters from the League of Women Voters and Common Cause registered their support. Opposition testimony from CALA argued the bill would impede legitimate investigations and federal oversight of elections, and questioned the need for the measure. Committee discussion focused heavily on whether the bill addressed a real threat, the chain of custody for ballots, and the scope of the signature-challenge provisions. After closing remarks from the author and the chair, the committee voted to pass SB 73 and re-refer it to the Committee on Public Safety. The initial roll call was 5-1 with one member absent, and after the absent member’s vote was added, the final vote was 6-2-1. The bill advanced from committee.