Transcript Highlights:

• Matt Goodlaw, one of your LFC program evaluators.
• Also on this project is Elizabeth Dodson, another program evaluator.
• It's an evaluation brief. It's in Tab J of your binder.
• . health of the local entity, but not necessarily evaluative.
• Or is that best handled elsewhere, not with our evaluators? Probably.

Transcript Highlights:

• The Senate proposed amendments to House Bill 1354, a bill relating to evaluations conducted by appraisers
• In subsection 3, it is clarified that appraisal and evaluations are distinctly different from each other
• ... ...or provides an evaluation, and the amendment in Section 4 clarifies that a certified appraiser
• may provide an evaluation if that evaluation is permitted by law.
• Despite favorable scientific evaluations deeming it suitable for long-term storage, the project faced

Keywords: 908, all

Summary: The House convened with prayer, the Pledge of Allegiance, and a quorum present, then approved journal corrections and recognized visiting students from Underwood School. The chamber also handled several conference committee appointments after failing to concur with Senate amendments on House bills 1022, 1049, 1229, and 1029, and after the Senate failed to concur on House amendments to Senate bills 2010 and 2113. The House then concurred in or passed a series of amended measures, including House Bills 1481 (dental insurance loss ratio and reporting), 1511 (physician guidance on abortion law, with an emergency clause), 1562 (mandated reporter training), 1197 (correctional facilities study), 1095 (child protective services liaison work group), 1317 (barber licensing board changes), 1549 (corrections facility grants and reentry-related provisions), 1354 (appraiser evaluations), 1374 (open meeting exemption for township supervisors during on-site inspections), 1355 (abbreviated notice for administrative rulemaking), 1025 (advanced nuclear energy study), 1470 (Game and Fish fee changes), 1592 (Lignite Research Council updates), and 1375 (alcohol service/photo ID provisions). Final passage votes were recorded on each bill, with most passing comfortably and some drawing notable opposition, especially HB 1470 and HB 1549. The House spent substantial time on Senate Bill 2011, the Highway Patrol appropriation. Members discussed shifting one-time funding from the general fund to the Electronic Motor Carrier Permit Fund, including body armor, preliminary breath tests, an emergency vehicle course, resurfacing, fleet costs, and handgun/taser replacement, while also noting a federal grant and no new FTEs. Questions focused on salary-line increases and the new-and-vacant FTE pool, with Appropriations explaining that those dollars had been moved back into agency budgets from OMB. The bill passed 84-6. The House also passed Senate Bill 2013, the Commissioner of University and School Lands appropriation, after discussion of Trust Lands operations, unclaimed property staffing, and distributions from the Common Schools Trust Fund; one member was excused for a conflict, and the bill passed 67-22. Senate Bill 2023, the Racing Commission appropriation, passed 65-25 after a brief explanation of the agency’s responsibilities and funding. A major policy debate centered on Senate Bill 2385, which revises mobile home park regulation. Supporters said it creates receivership procedures if a license is revoked, requires clearer tenant notices, limits certain fees, and strengthens protections against eviction and utility overcharges. Two members were excused from voting due to conflicts tied to mobile home park ownership, and the bill passed 84-4. Another extended debate occurred on Senate Bill 2159, which allows the State Energy Research Center to study nuclear-related projects with approval from the Industrial Commission and consultation with the radioactive waste advisory council. Supporters said it is meant to help study advanced nuclear energy while preserving existing prohibitions on high-level radioactive waste storage; opponents raised concerns that the language could weaken prior protections and open the door to waste-related research or storage. The transcript ends during that debate, before a final vote on SB 2159 is shown.

Transcript Highlights:

• When they're evaluating projects for us, they're still being paid by the Urban Forestry Program because
• We also have photos in the evaluation, so hopefully that would be helpful to tell the stories.
• We're evaluating that right now and considering all options on how we can implement the regulations as
• Opened some issues that you now feel like you need more time to evaluate?
• We have personnel going out there now doing trail logs and evaluating the roads and buildings.

Keywords: 988, house, all

Transcript Highlights:

• We are also in the process of strengthening our program evaluation systems.
• The impacts of the spending targets should be further evaluated by the legislature in order to ensure
• So during the vetting process, we evaluated these companies, and then we made the decision to select
• As mentioned, all of the uses have to be evaluated on a case-by-case basis.
• So I don’t know what we can say about formal evaluation planned. Yeah, absolutely.

Keywords: 988, house, all

Transcript Highlights:

• Hospitals should evaluate those prices that are above 500%.
• We asked the treasurer to evaluate a...
• We asked the treasurer to evaluate a public insurance program that would have included VHI and VSEA.
• The other body added a provision that when such an evaluation is required, that individual can obtain
• their own independent evaluation as well and provide it to the court.

Keywords: 927, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• Would you explain that evaluate and manage personnel so that I can understand exactly what it is you're
• Which is, the language here says to evaluate and manage personnel, and I guess my confusion is that I'm
• So, you're talking about evaluating and managing the volunteers. Is that correct?
• Which is, the language here says to evaluate and manage personnel, and I guess my confusion is that I'm
• So, you're talking about evaluating and managing the volunteers. Is that correct?

Bills: SB134, SB1356, SB1407, SB1611, SB1639, SB169, SB1722, SB182, SB1870, SB2039, SB432, SB609, SB715, SB716

Keywords: retirement, public employees, reemployment, benefit adjustment, Oklahoma Public Employees Retirement System, state government, OMES, Office of Management and Enterprise Services, Department of Labor, Department of Veterans Affairs, Department of Rehabilitation Services, civil service, human capital management, state employee disputes, whistleblower, veterans employment, veterans placement, fleet management, state fleet, motor vehicles

Transcript Highlights:

• So it gives us a little bit of time to sort of evaluate and vet them.
• We're currently evaluating them. And one follow-up, Mr.
• In developing data that we might use to evaluate bills if they come to us. Thank you.
• In developing data that we might use to evaluate bills if they come to us.
• Thank you. data that we might use to evaluate bills if they come to us.

Summary: The Senate Committee on Finance and Tax met to hear a staff presentation on Florida property taxes. Staff Director Azar Khan gave an overview of the property tax system, including constitutional limits, January 1 assessment rules, homestead and non-homestead residential property, commercial and agricultural classifications, tangible personal property, and centrally assessed property. The presentation highlighted major exemptions and assessment caps, such as the homestead exemptions, Save Our Homes, the 10% cap for non-homestead property, and favorable treatment for agricultural/classified use land. It also reviewed long-term growth in just value and taxable value statewide, along with declining millage rates over time as taxable values have risen. Members then discussed the possibility of eliminating property taxes and the fiscal consequences of doing so. Senator Jones asked about the impact on local governments and referenced estimates that replacing property tax revenue could require roughly $43 billion; staff responded that current levied amounts are in the ballpark of more than $30 billion for non-school levies and more than $20 billion for school levies, but that the exact impact would depend on county and district budgets and collections. Senators Bernard, Passidomo, Gates, and others emphasized the need for more data on alternative revenue sources, such as sales tax increases or other combinations, and for input from counties and cities before considering broad tax changes. Chair Avila explained the presentation was intended to give members a foundation before property tax proposals are heard in committee, noting that several bills had already been filed involving homestead and tangible personal property. No bills were voted on, and no formal action was taken beyond the informational presentation. The committee then adjourned.

Transcript Highlights:

• The bill directs the Joint Commission on Technology and Science to evaluate the feasibility and impact
• It evaluates best practices for demand management programs. I move passage of the bill.”
• It evaluates best practices for demand management. is as the clerk described, it evaluates best practices
• HB 768 relates to custody and visitation arrangements for minor custody evaluations.
• This bill makes it clear that judges can order custody evaluations.

Keywords: March 11, 2026 - Regular Session, 976, house, all

Transcript Highlights:

• To do that evaluation in our Office of Performance and Accountability and so that is how we're gonna
• All right, I think that next we have our program evaluation team coming up.
• We have Sarah Rang who's our program evaluator and we'll have Secretary Groginsky. both to provide us
• My name is Doctor Sarah Rang, and I'm a program evaluator with the LFC.
• And then reiterating a recommendation from the 2020 evaluation.

Transcript Highlights:

• So the concern is that appropriate mental health evaluations aren't mandated as part of those things
• mental health evaluations mental health evaluations aren't<01:24:35.560> mandated<01:24:36.560
• <01:25:48.400> looked<01:25:48.600> at<01:25:48.960> being<01:25:49.239> evaluated
• <01:25:49.719> at<01:25:49.840> a be looked at being evaluated at a be looked at being
• evaluated at a hospital<01:25:50.520> first<01:25:50.880> before<01:25:51.119> they

Keywords: 1191, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• This bill requires municipalities to give a 90-day notice for any re-evaluation of assessed property,
• In Hudson, we always send out notices of value in regard to re-evaluation when we do a townwide re-evaluation
• In Hudson, they always send out notices of value in regard to re-evaluation when they do a townwide re-evaluation
• The citizens in Nashua and throughout are concerned about surprise evaluations.
• Hospital or somebody who never got their mail that could respond to the re-evaluation.

Keywords: 1191, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• Currently, we receive 38 requests for evaluations from private schools per month.
• The increase to $1.3 billion will be so helpful for school districts taking on increased evaluations
• We evaluate these students. We hold a review of this evaluation called an ARD meeting.
• We have experienced an increased evaluation load, special education evaluations, and expect that to increase
• This will allow more students to be evaluated and qualify for special education services.

Bills: HB2

Keywords: disaster preparedness, emergency management, flooding, mass fatality, mass casualty, fatality tracking, body recovery, autopsy, justice of the peace, medical examiner, county judge, sheriff, mayor, emergency coordinator, emergency manager license, volunteer management system, volunteer registration, criminal history check, background check, Texas Division of Emergency Management

Summary: The committee continued public testimony on House Bill 2, which would make major changes to public school funding, teacher pay, special education, early learning, school safety, and related programs. Many superintendents and education advocates supported the bill’s overall direction but urged changes, especially a larger basic allotment and more flexible funding for rural and small districts. Witnesses from Paint Creek, West Hardin, Cushing, Blooming Grove, Mildred, Buffalo, Plano, and rural school groups said the bill’s targeted raises and new requirements would not fully cover inflation, TRS/Medicare costs, transportation, insurance, or support staff salaries, and several asked the committee to restore the House version’s higher basic allotment and small-school allotment. Charter school representatives supported the facilities funding changes and said charter schools need state help because they cannot levy taxes, while also noting the funding gap with ISDs. Fine arts advocates asked the committee to restore the fine arts allotment, arguing arts improve engagement, attendance, and academic outcomes, especially in rural and at-risk communities. Early learning and special education witnesses supported parts of the bill but raised concerns about pre-K restrictions, disability-related pre-K access, and the need to preserve or clarify special education provisions and mental health oversight language. Several witnesses praised the teacher pay raise, teacher incentive allotment expansion, and teacher preparation investments, saying they would help recruit and retain educators and improve student outcomes. Others, including counselors and support staff advocates, argued the bill should also include raises for counselors, nurses, librarians, bus drivers, custodians, aides, and other non-teaching employees who keep schools running. One witness from the Texas Counseling Association opposed the substitute because it removed a counselor pay provision, warning of counselor shortages and inequities. A parent and special education advocate said the bill’s structure creates too many strings attached and asked for a larger basic allotment instead of more targeted funding. Another witness from Mental Health America urged keeping the collaborative task force on public school mental health services through 2031, and a disability rights advocate said the committee substitute appears to omit some special education items that were in the House version. The committee also briefly took up House Bill 6, a school discipline bill. After questions about automatic mandatory expulsion for vape possession and concerns about younger students, the committee adopted the substitute and voted to report HB 6 favorably to the full Senate by a 9-1 vote, with Senator Menendez voting no and Senators West and Menendez expressing reservations but supporting further discussion. After that vote, testimony on HB 2 resumed. Senators used the hearing to ask about the bill’s cost, the difference between the basic allotment and the bill’s targeted funding buckets, and whether the permanent teacher pay increase shifts pressure off districts. The bill’s supporters emphasized that it represents an historic, roughly $8 billion investment and that many of the new funding streams are intended to be permanent or to address specific district needs.

Transcript Highlights:

• Also, to add a new section to amend Section 342G-104, subsection B3, to add 'evaluate' instead so it
• reads 'evaluate and promote recyclable market development activities.'
• Also, to add a new section to amend Section 342G-104, subsection B3, to add 'evaluate' instead so it
• reads 'evaluate and promote recyclable market development activities.'
• g-104 subsections B3 to add evaluate g-104 subsections B3 to add evaluate instead<01:03:19.960><

Keywords: 910, house, all

Summary: The committee heard testimony on HB 818 HD1, which would establish the Waiawa Community Development District. The Attorney General’s office said the bill may not comply with requirements for a special fund, and DLNR asked for further amendments so lease revenues would remain with DLNR while it continues managing the lands. DLNR cited ongoing costs, including the Uncle Billy’s demolition debt and management needs at Banyan Drive/Banyan Country Club. HCDA/Waiawa representatives supported the bill, agreed that DLNR should keep lease revenues while it remains the land manager, and said a future transfer of land management would change where revenues should go. Members focused on whether removing lease revenue would undercut the bill and on how existing and future revenues should be allocated. The committee then took up HB 338 HD1 and HB 339 HD1 on renewable energy-related utility transactions and procurement. Testimony came from the Consumer Advocate, the State Energy Office, the Public Utilities Commission, Hawaiian Electric, IBEW Local 1260, Ulupono Initiative, and Life of the Land. Supporters generally backed the measures, while some asked for labor-related strengthening language. Discussion centered on how the PUC should handle competing bids or offers in utility merger or acquisition situations, with concerns raised about NDAs, timing, and whether the original version or amended language better allowed public and intervenor participation. A witness from Life of the Land argued that utilities should not negotiate under NDA in a way that blocks later public competition, and a PUC-related witness said the current language was changed from the original to address PUC testimony. Finally, the committee heard HB 1467 HD1 on housing resiliency. OIP was not present, while B&F raised concerns about placing federal funds into a special fund, saying federal grant money should remain in a separate P fund for transparency, accountability, and single-audit compliance. State agencies and groups including OPSD, Hawaii Emergency Management Agency, the Climate Advisory Team, and Hawaii Realtors supported the measure. Testimony emphasized that many older roofs lack hurricane clips and that strengthening homes could reduce disaster sheltering and temporary housing costs. IBEW Local 1260 supported the bill but argued that building to current standards upfront is preferable to retrofitting later. Members questioned funding structure, eligibility, and whether the program should be needs-based; the bill was described as limited to households under 140% AMI. No votes or final actions were taken in the portion of the meeting provided.

Transcript Highlights:

• It has nothing to do with evaluating the need in a community.
• It has nothing to do with evaluating the need in a community.
• It's not a net need evaluation.
• Once that third-party evaluation is agreed upon, we split the cost.
• c> is<01:31:24.520> a it's not a net need evaluation it is a it's not a net need evaluation

Keywords: 1191, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• If you recruit and evaluate staff, does the SAU recruit and evaluate staff also? Yes.
• SAU recruit and evaluate staff also? SAU recruit and evaluate staff also?
• would actually prefer to see us evaluate would actually prefer to see us evaluate educational<01
• same same levels that they're evaluated same same levels that they're evaluated throughout<01:48:02.480
• If you want to<01:52:49.599> evaluate<01:52:50.719> academics to evaluate academics to

Keywords: 928, house, all

Summary: The meeting focused on school governance and a proposed shift in responsibilities related to SAU consolidation, with committee members first discussing how school board members and other local officials would be selected for future testimony. The main presentation came from the New Hampshire Association of School Principals, whose executive director Brady Belair and several principals argued that mandatory statewide administrative consolidation should be approached cautiously and that any consolidation should be voluntary and locally driven. They said anticipated savings may not materialize, citing possible higher personnel, transportation, and technology costs, and warned that forcing changes could create disruption without improving student outcomes. Principals testified that their jobs are already broad and demanding, centered on instructional leadership, student safety, staff supervision, family communication, and day-to-day crisis response. Kathleen Murphy of Amherst described working 60 to 70 hours a week and said principals spend substantial time coaching teachers, handling student issues, and supporting school climate; she said adding more administrative duties would compromise student learning and teacher growth. Adam Osborne of Bow Memorial School similarly described principals as daily problem-solvers who set school-level direction and create conditions for schools to thrive. The witnesses also emphasized that principals, superintendents, school boards, and business administrators have different training and responsibilities, and that specialized tasks such as special education compliance, FERPA/HIPAA issues, and labor matters require appropriate expertise. Committee members questioned the witnesses about overlap between superintendent and principal duties, the completeness of statutory responsibility lists, and whether some functions such as curriculum, discipline, hiring, and evaluation are shared. The principals acknowledged some overlap and collaboration, but said superintendents typically handle broader system-level, legal, and central-office responsibilities while principals focus on building-level leadership and teacher support. One member raised the earlier expectation that districts might move to a principal-plus-business-manager model, but the witnesses said that model did not develop as expected and that district structures vary widely. No votes or formal actions were taken in the portion of the meeting provided.

Transcript Highlights:

• If you recruit and evaluate staff, does the SAU recruit and evaluate staff also? >> Yes.
• would actually prefer to see us evaluate would actually prefer to see us evaluate educational<01
• same same levels that they're evaluated same same levels that they're evaluated throughout<01:48:02.480
• Are we want to evaluate how good is New Hampshire's education, right?
• If you want to<01:52:49.599> evaluate<01:52:50.719> academics to evaluate academics to

Keywords: 928, house, all

Summary: The committee met to hear from the New Hampshire Association of School Principals as part of its review of a proposal involving statewide administrative consolidation and changes to school governance. Members first discussed how school board witnesses would be selected, with the chair saying the committee would seek a mix of district sizes and structures and would also accept emailed input. The principals’ association said it represents more than 550 principals and assistant principals and urged caution about any mandatory consolidation, arguing that successful consolidations are gradual and voluntary. Association leaders and principals testified that principals already handle a wide range of responsibilities, including instructional leadership, student discipline, safety, staff supervision and evaluation, family and community engagement, and day-to-day crisis response. They argued that shifting more legal, budgetary, and administrative duties onto principals would reduce time for coaching teachers and supporting students, increase burnout and turnover, and create legal and training risks, especially in areas such as special education, privacy, and labor issues. They also said the roles of superintendents, principals, and school board members are distinct and require different training and expertise. Members asked detailed questions about how responsibilities are divided between principals and SAUs, whether principals recruit and evaluate staff, and how much time principals work. One principal said she works about 60 to 70 hours a week and that additional duties would be difficult to absorb. Another principal described his school’s structure, the importance of community building, and the need to preserve district-wide alignment if consolidation moves forward. No votes were taken during this portion of the meeting.

Transcript Highlights:

• At the same time, pathways for clinicians to become authorized 5150 evaluators vary significantly across
• By making clear what is required to be designated as a 5150 evaluator, SB 16 will help counties recruit
• And I think that making sure that we re-evaluate as we go and make the improvements and tweaks that are
• This highlights the need for more oversight, re-evaluation of process, transparency, efficiency, and
• SB 874 requires DHS to take the following actions to evaluate and improve behavioral health treatment

Keywords: 988, house, all

Transcript Highlights:

• How does the district evaluate the cumulative economic impact? Absolutely.
• How does the district evaluate the cumulative economic impact? The list goes on.
• workforce, the Air District, when we were evaluating how to best implement this rule, the phasing out
• of how we can... ...and I was part of that direction of an ongoing evaluation of how we can ensure that
• That's something that is part of your evaluation of the success of this.

Keywords: 987, senate, all

Summary: The Senate Committee on Rules met to consider several gubernatorial appointments and a reference of bills to committee. The committee first approved or advanced a series of appointments not required to appear, including Paulette Brown Hines to the California Transportation Commission, Christopher Clark and Laura Capps to the Board of State and Community Corrections, Maggie Hallahan to the Boating and Waterways Commission, Kent Sasaki to the Building Standards Commission, and Danielle N. Munoz to the Board of Barbering and Cosmetology. The committee also approved the reference of bills to committees. The committee then heard from Tanya Pacheco Warner, PhD, for reappointment to the San Joaquin Valley Unified Air Pollution Control District Board. She described her public health background, her family’s experience with asthma, and her work on agricultural burning phaseouts, mobile-source emissions strategies, AB 617 community programs, and climate and air-quality education. Members questioned her about the economic impacts of air rules on agriculture, the district’s approach to mobile-source reductions amid federal uncertainty, AB 617 community outcomes, and how she communicates climate and air-quality issues. The appointment was approved and moved to the full Senate. The committee next considered three California Horse Racing Board reappointments: Dennis Alfieri, Damascus Castellanos, and Thomas Hudnut, J.D. The nominees and committee members discussed horse and rider safety improvements, the sharp decline in equine fatalities, the impact of Golden Gate Fields’ closure on Northern California racing, declining interest in the sport, and possible revenue options such as racing-on-demand machines and other gambling-related changes. Public witnesses from the racing industry spoke in support. All three appointments were approved and sent to the full Senate. Finally, the committee heard from Julie Lee and Ann Patterson, J.D., for the Delta Stewardship Council. Both emphasized the Delta’s importance to statewide water supply, ecosystem protection, science-based decision-making, climate adaptation, and community engagement. Senators asked about the council’s co-equal goals, the role of science and social science, public trust, and whether the council’s mission should continue after specific projects are resolved. A public witness from the Association of California Water Agencies supported both nominees. Both appointments were approved and moved to the full Senate.

Transcript Highlights:

• talk about, oh, we need to perform an audit or we performed an audit, and they are referencing an evaluation
• An external audit is separate from that structure and can do an evaluation that is separate from the
• That's when other auditors come and evaluate me and my function and my standards every five years.
• Our audit objective was to evaluate whether the Oregon Parks and Recreation Department has established
• Senator Lieber, members of the committee, and Senator Robinson, I think that's a constant evaluation

Keywords: 907, all

Summary: The Joint Interim Committee on Legislative Audits met on June 17 for informational presentations. The Department of Administrative Services, through Chief Audit Executive Eli Ritchie, gave an overview of statewide internal audit requirements and the fiscal year 2025 report. He explained the difference between internal and external audit, described Oregon’s statutory and rule-based internal audit structure, and reported that 30 agencies had internal audit functions, with most meeting required standards. He said 73 audits and 49 advisory/consulting engagements were completed statewide, with strong compliance overall, though a few agencies were rebuilding audit committees after vacancies. No committee questions were raised after the presentation. The Secretary of State’s Audits Division then presented its Government Waste Hotline annual report. Director Steve Bergman and audit manager Olivia Rekhed described changes made to align the hotline with statute, including renaming it the Government Waste Hotline, creating a review panel, improving anonymity protections, removing fraud reporting from the hotline’s scope, and adjusting reporting timelines. They said hotline volume increased modestly in 2025, most reports were referred elsewhere or closed for insufficient evidence, and two reports were substantiated, including questioned costs of about $856 for personal use of a state vehicle and about $2.9 million tied to the Preschool Promise program. Committee members asked about hotline staffing, cost, anonymity, and follow-up on findings; staff said the hotline is lightly resourced, uses a contracted intake service, and referrals or recommendations are followed up through management letters and later reviews. The committee also heard an audit of the Oregon Parks and Recreation Department’s safety inspections and asset tracking. The Secretary of State’s office reported that OPRD had not consistently conducted or documented quarterly OSHA safety inspections and had incomplete asset records, including missing acquisition dates and costs for many assets. The audit made eight recommendations covering safety inspection policies, asset management guidance, tagging, reconciliations, disposition controls, training, and a new asset management system; OPRD agreed to all recommendations. OPRD officials said they had already begun training staff, improving inspection procedures, and working toward a replacement asset system, while noting operational challenges from a large, dispersed park system and manual processes. Committee members asked about what kinds of assets are tracked, how tagging works, whether items were actually being lost, and how much tracking is necessary for low-value tools; OPRD said the main issue was inconsistent classification and documentation rather than widespread loss. The meeting ended with no votes or formal actions taken.

Transcript Highlights:

• It is sometimes difficult in these evaluations to nail down completely the impact with regard to cost
• and benefit for these proposals, but that process will be made even harder if those evaluations are
• Um it is sometimes difficult uh in<00:24:06.880> these<00:24:07.200> evaluations<00:24:
• to to nail down uh in these evaluations to to nail down uh completely<00:24:10.400> the<00:24
• need in order to make the evaluations need in order to make the evaluations that<00:43:36.160>

Keywords: 1187, senate, all