Video & Transcript : 'emission fees' :

Page 17 of 500
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Judiciary & Civil Jurisprudence Apr 9th, 2025

Judiciary & Civil Jurisprudence

Transcript Highlights:
  • And the reason is that there's the unknown of the legal fees. Ms.
  • That partition took another seven years. $1.2 million in legal fees only.
  • The problematic attorney fee provision requires non-heir co-tenants to pay legal costs.
  • . fees to the government if it loses its appeal, discouraging delay tactics.
  • You can send an offer of settlement and they end up paying costs and attorney's fees.
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Judiciary & Civil Jurisprudence Apr 9th, 2025

Judiciary & Civil Jurisprudence

Summary: The Committee on Judiciary and Civil Jurisprudence met to hear House Bill 1761, a broad judicial package focused on increasing judicial compensation and adding accountability and efficiency measures. The chair explained that HB 1707 and HB 2100 were withdrawn from the agenda, and that HB 1761 would be taken up first because many judges and stakeholders were present. The committee substitute for HB 1761 proposed a 30% increase in base judicial pay to $182,000, changes to judicial retirement linkage, stronger judicial conduct provisions, and efficiency measures such as targeted reporting for judges not meeting benchmarks, appellate in-person meeting encouragement, and time limits on certain motions. The chair and several supporters said judicial pay had reached “emergency status,” citing Texas’s low national ranking and difficulty recruiting and retaining qualified judges. Witnesses in support included presiding and district judges, the State Bar’s judicial section, business and trial lawyer groups, and prosecutors. They emphasized that many judges work long hours off the bench, handle warrants at night and on weekends, manage heavy dockets, and face recruitment problems in both urban and rural counties. Supporters also said higher pay would help attract experienced lawyers, retain judges, and improve court efficiency. Several witnesses and members discussed judicial accountability, including public reporting of court performance and the role of the Texas Supreme Court and presiding judges in setting benchmarks. Some members raised concerns that raw statistics can be misleading because judges also do substantial off-the-bench work and often help cover other courts’ dockets. There was also testimony and discussion about the bill’s conduct and discipline provisions. A representative of the Texas Civil Rights Project opposed parts of the bill that would tie pay raises to changes affecting judicial independence, warning about subjective bail-related discipline standards and possible chilling effects. The executive director of the State Commission on Judicial Conduct cautioned against civil penalties for complainants, saying it could discourage good-faith complaints and create litigation risks. Other witnesses supported accountability reforms but urged caution about unintended consequences, especially for family and emergency cases and for judges handling warrants and other time-sensitive matters. After testimony, the committee withdrew the committee substitute and left HB 1761 pending, then recessed the committee.
MN

Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session

House Judiciary Finance and Civil Law Committee 4/1/25

Judiciary Finance and Civil Law

Transcript Highlights:
  • Um, and so in the interest then of the third part that we removed, um, removing the penalty fee, um,
  • failed to give the required notice that they no longer qualify, um, we had put in that there would be a fee
CA
Transcript Highlights:
  • We'd have the fee in place.
  • Legally, the board approves the fee. Is the fee a legal fee at that moment?” “Yes, it is.”
  • So you have a legal fee.
  • It is a fee.” “It is legally a fee at that point in time.
  • Those fees would have applied to both the newest, cleanest CARB-certified TRUs as well as zero-emission
Summary: The committee hearing focused heavily on CARB’s broad trailer bill request for regulatory fee authority. Finance and CARB argued the proposal would let CARB develop fees to recover reasonable costs for implementing and enforcing regulations, while the LAO recommended rejection because the authority was too broad, could apply to an entire division of code, and would delegate core legislative taxing/fee-setting power without enough guardrails. Members from both parties raised concerns about the breadth of the authority, accountability, affordability impacts, and whether the Legislature would be put in an up-or-down position after CARB had already developed regulations. CARB responded that fees would still go through a budget change proposal and legislative approval before collection, and cited existing examples such as transport refrigeration units and commercial harborcraft fees. The committee then reviewed CARB’s request for permanent resources to implement SB 905 on carbon capture, utilization, storage, and carbon dioxide removal. CARB said the Legislature had previously authorized limited-term positions and funding, but it had struggled to recruit and retain staff with specialized regulatory and technical expertise, and that the work had included pre-rulemaking contracts, technology review, and permit-related preparation. Members questioned the pace of work, the use of limited-term positions, and whether additional permitting authority would be needed. CARB said it hoped to begin rulemaking later in the year if permanent resources were approved. Members also discussed the cap-and-trade spending plan, noting lower-than-expected auction revenues but higher interest earnings, and the need to monitor the Greenhouse Gas Reduction Fund and possible May Revision changes. The committee then heard overviews of the zero-emission vehicle package, the Community Air Protection Program, demand-side grid support, and e-bike incentives. CARB described ongoing investments in community-based transportation equity, drayage trucks, harbor craft, and other clean technology demonstrations, while members pressed on affordability, program duplication, and whether enough funding was being directed to incentive programs. No formal votes were taken during the portion provided, and the chair repeatedly indicated that the hearing was intended to surface concerns for later budget negotiations.
CA
Transcript Highlights:
  • Legally, the board approves the fee. Is the fee a legal fee at that moment? Yes. All right, it is.
  • It is a fee. It's legally a fee. That's correct. At that point in time.
  • Look at compliance dates, whether it be for complying with a particular emission standard or even a fee
  • of their fees.
  • Those fees would have applied to both the newest, cleanest CARB-certified TRUs, as well as zero-emission
KY
Transcript Highlights:
  • c> regarding air emission fees and so at regarding air emission fees and so at the<00:05:20.680><c> time
  • But the bill also removes an existing 4,000-ton cap on calculating emission fees.
  • The bill also removes an existing 4,000-ton cap on calculating emission fees.
  • You don't have to pay emissions fees on them.
  • You don't have to pay emissions fees on them.
Summary: The committee met with a quorum and first considered House Bill 88, which was described as a short bill to clarify procedures for Waste Management boards, including term limits, appointments, and making sure consolidated governments actively recruit community members and make openings easier to find. The sponsor said the bill was intended to resolve confusion about members staying on after terms expire. The bill received no opposition, passed the committee unanimously, and was reported favorably for the floor. The committee then took up House Bill 346, as amended by a committee substitute. The sponsor explained that the bill responds to a dispute over air emission fees, especially for emergency generators and backup generators used for worker safety and limited non-emergency testing. The bill would exempt emergency generators and backup generators operating 100 hours or less for maintenance/testing from fees, while also removing an existing 4,000-ton cap so the per-ton fee would drop for most permitted sources. Members discussed the possible impact on utilities and ratepayers, with concerns raised that costs could be passed through to consumers and affect coal-dependent areas. The sponsor and another member argued the change would generally reduce fees for most sources and incentivize emissions reductions; the cabinet was described as neutral, and the affected utilities were identified as TVA, LG&E, East Kentucky Power, and Big Rivers, with only TVA having raised comments. The committee substitute was adopted, and the bill passed the committee with a favorable recommendation, though one member voted no and several members explained yes votes while expressing ongoing concerns about future rate impacts. At the end of the meeting, members briefly discussed broader concerns about utility surcharges and the need to monitor the effects of legislation on ratepayers, but those comments were not part of the bill under consideration. The chair noted that future meetings may include more bills and could start earlier if needed, and the committee then adjourned.
CA

California 2025-2026 Regular Session

Assembly Transportation Committee Jul 14th, 2025

Transportation

Transcript Highlights:
  • And again, on the issue of carbon and NOx emissions, it is true that older cars had higher NOx emissions
  • That's a lot of growth since the original $80 fee and the $85 fee were approved as a flat fee some time
  • It is a capped fee. It is not a mandatory fee.
  • , surprise fees at the end of the day, and so I—” “...fees and all those types of things, the price fees
  • emission reductions.
Summary: The Assembly Transportation Committee heard several bills, beginning with SB 712 by Senator Grove, which would expand the smog-check exemption for classic vehicles from model years 1976 to 1986, phased in over five years and sunset in 2032. Supporters, including lowrider and classic car advocates and the Specialty Equipment Market Association, said the bill would preserve car culture, reduce burdens on owners of rarely driven vehicles, and support related businesses. Opponents, including air district representatives, the American Lung Association, and environmental groups, argued the bill would increase pollution and weaken an important clean-air program. The committee ultimately passed SB 712 on a due-pass-as-amended vote to Appropriations after adopting amendments and holding the roll open for additional votes. The committee then took up SB 800 by Senator Reyes, presented by Assemblymember Richardson, which would direct Caltrans and local governments to assess mitigation measures for suicides on locally owned overpasses crossing state highways. Support came from local officials, health organizations, and community groups, who described the measure as a needed suicide-prevention step and a way to identify high-risk locations for safety improvements. There was no organized opposition, and members spoke in favor of the bill before it was moved on a due-pass vote to Appropriations. Next, the committee considered SB 30 by Senator Cortese, as amended, to restrict California public entities from selling, donating, or transferring decommissioned diesel locomotives and railroad equipment with Tier 1 or older engines unless the engine is removed, while allowing some Tier 2 and newer transfers with approval. Supporters said the bill would prevent older diesel engines from continuing to pollute elsewhere and would reduce health and climate harms. Transit agencies opposed the measure, arguing it could limit useful transfers of locomotives and should instead allow case-by-case air-quality review. The bill passed out of committee on a 6-4 vote, with the roll held open. The committee also heard SB 791 by Senator Cortese, which would replace the flat $85 dealer document processing charge with a 1% fee capped at $350, along with new disclosure requirements. Dealers and industry groups supported the bill as a way to recover costs and modernize a fee that has lagged behind inflation, while consumer advocates opposed it as too high and burdensome for buyers. After extensive questioning about transparency, negotiability, and affordability, the committee passed SB 791 to Appropriations. The meeting also included the start of testimony on SB 34, a port-related air quality and anti-automation measure from Senator Richardson, with support from ILWU and allied groups and opposition from some transit and business interests, but the transcript cuts off before final action on that bill.
AZ

Arizona 2026 Regular Session

03/17/2026 - House Natural Resources, Energy & Water

Natural Resources, Energy & Water

Transcript Highlights:
  • So you have 2,400 homes, you said, so they all pay their HOA fees, and this would probably be an extra
  • financial impact of the tortosa homeowners so you have 2,400 homes you said so they all pay their HOA fees
  • Chair and members, Senate Bill 1447 extends the exemption from the groundwater withdrawal fee for water
  • The bill additionally extends by four years the groundwater withdrawal fee for groundwater and irrigation
  • This continues a fee for pumping groundwater currently on existing agricultural lands.
US

US Federal 2025-2026 Regular Session

US House Floor Proceedings (Tuesday, March 3, 2026)

US Federal House Floor Meeting

Transcript Highlights:
  • conservation holdings that cannot be practically developed in exchange for approximately 65,000 acres of fee
  • The America the Beautiful Pass is an annual interagency pass that covers entry fees to over 2,000 recreational
  • <04:46:06.120><c> that</c><04:46:06.240><c> covers</c><04:46:06.880><c> entry</c><04:46:07.280><c> fees
  • </c><04:46:07.680><c> to</c><04:46:07.800><c> over</c> pass that covers entry fees to over pass that
  • covers entry fees to over 2,000<04:46:09.240><c> recreational</c><04:46:09.960><c> sites</c><04:46:10.280
OK

Oklahoma 2026 Regular Session

Public Safety Feb 17th, 2026 at 08:30 am

Public Safety

Transcript Highlights:
  • Raises the DUI assessment fee from $160 to $200.
  • So currently, with the fee structure the way it is, do these fees ever go unpaid, and if they do, what
  • No, those fees would be paid prior to taking the assessment.
  • to $55 fee.
  • Would they pay the fee?
Bills: SB1192 , SB1264 , SB1284 , SB1810 , SB1921
NM

New Mexico 2026 Regular Session

Senate - Tax, Business and Transportation Jan 29th, 2026 at 02:36 pm

Senate Tax, Business & Transportation

Transcript Highlights:
  • So what this bill did in 2020 is create a $100 fee on large pet food manufacturers.
  • This whole question about whether this is a tax or a fee is something that's been in federal court.
  • So that's how it works; it's just a hundred dollar fee. Again, in fairness, Mr.
  • How do the fee structures work to ensure that it's really fair? Just introduce yourself.
  • What is the typical fee for a neuter?
Bills: SB97 , SB55 , SB40 , SB38 , SB120 , SB113 , SB116 , SB117 , SB118
WA

Washington 2025-2026 Regular Session

House Appropriations Jan 28th, 2026 at 04:00 pm

Appropriations

Transcript Highlights:
  • It has had about a 9% per year return on investments and currently has about a 0.39% expense fee that
  • The CEF at the University of Washington has had an annualized return of about 7% net of fees, and an
  • expense fee of about 0.9%, a portion of which is directed to the University of Washington Advancement
  • Pringle pointed out, and you can see in the staff report, the Investment Board's internal expense fee
  • I was four years old the last time the clerks had their fees adjusted.
Bills: HB2565 , HB1607 , HB2254 , HB2385 , HB2531 , HB2543
WA

Washington 2025-2026 Regular Session

Senate Early Learning & K-12 Education Jan 15th, 2026 at 10:30 am

Early Learning & K-12 Education

Transcript Highlights:
  • with amendments next time, and we will go and just have Senate Bill 5943, the use of school impact fees
  • Senate Bill 5943, the use of school impact fees, with an amendment, is before us.
  • Senate Bill 5943 allows expiring impact fees to be used to modernize school facilities to comply with
  • This amendment provides that the authority to use impact fees for the expanded purposes under the bill
  • So we heard some testimony yesterday, I believe it was, about impact fees.
Bills: SB5952 , SB5961 , SB5969 , SB5841 , SB5943
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Human Services Apr 1st, 2025

Human Services

Transcript Highlights:
  • We're just not requiring them to in the last one was a decrease in late fees on on some of the penalties
  • Additional fees can make that starting point even higher.
  • But because of their lower emissions, also get permitted to run for.
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Human Services Apr 1st, 2025

Human Services

Transcript Highlights:
  • Members, the committee substitute provides clarifying language that excludes monthly fee-based discount
  • One solution to high prescription costs are monthly fee-based membership discount programs.
  • It requires consumers to pay both annual subscriptions and monthly fees, which creates a member-only
  • these issues by ensuring Medicaid reimbursement reimbursement rates reflect the usual and customary fees
  • So House Bill 2402... would clarify that monthly fee-based subscription programs are exempt from the
CA

California 2025-2026 Regular Session

Assembly Transportation Committee Jul 14th, 2025

Transcript Highlights:
  • NOx emissions.
  • fee some time ago.
  • It is a capped fee. It is not a mandatory fee. You are correct. It is a capped fee.
  • It is not a mandatory fee.
  • emission reductions.
Summary: The committee first took up SB 712, which would expand California’s smog-check exemption for classic vehicles by adding model years 1976 through 1986 in phases, with a sunset in 2032. The author and supporters, including lowrider advocates and the Specialty Equipment Market Association, argued the bill would preserve car culture, support a small class of rarely driven collector vehicles, and reduce burdens on owners who struggle to find equipment for older smog tests. Opponents, including air district officials, the American Lung Association, and other environmental groups, warned the bill would weaken an important emissions-control program and increase pollution. After discussion, the committee adopted the motion to do pass as amended to Appropriations on a roll call vote of 10-0, with the roll held open for additional votes. The committee then heard SB 800, which requires Caltrans, working with local governments, to assess mitigation measures for suicide prevention on locally owned overpasses crossing state highways. The bill was presented as a response to recent tragedies in Rancho Cucamonga and was supported by local officials, health organizations, and suicide-prevention advocates, who said the measure would help identify high-risk locations and lead to life-saving interventions. There was no registered opposition. The committee members expressed support, and SB 800 was passed to Appropriations on a unanimous roll call vote, with the roll held open. Next, the committee considered SB 30, which would prohibit California public entities from selling, donating, or transferring decommissioned diesel locomotives and railroad equipment with Tier 1 or older engines unless the engine is removed, while allowing Tier 2 and newer transfers under certain conditions. The author and supporters framed the bill as a climate and public-health measure to prevent older, dirtier locomotives from continuing to pollute elsewhere, while transit agencies opposed it, arguing it could limit useful transfers of equipment that still supports passenger service and could be better handled through case-by-case air-quality review. After debate, the committee voted 6-4 to pass SB 30 as amended to Appropriations, with the roll held open for later additions. The committee also heard SB 791, which replaces the flat dealer document processing charge cap with a 1% fee capped at $350, along with new disclosure requirements. Dealers and industry groups supported the bill as a way to recover costs and improve transparency, while consumer advocates opposed it as an unjustified increase that would burden buyers. The committee approved SB 791 on a 8-? roll call vote and held the roll open. The meeting then moved on to SB 34, a port-air-quality bill presented by Senator Richardson, but the transcript ends during testimony and debate on that measure.