Transcript Highlights:

• For compact amendments, our ex officios do become voting members.
• So you have completed that first part, the compact negotiation with the director.
• We negotiated and signed one of the first tribal-state gaming compacts in 1995.
• I had not heard about that in other tribal compacts.
• I appreciate the committee's time to hear the proposed amendments to the compact.

Summary: The Senate Business, Financial Services and Trade Committee held a public hearing on a proposed tribal gaming compact amendment involving the Lummi Nation and the Washington State Gambling Commission. Tina Griffin, director of the Gambling Commission, explained the compact amendment process under the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act, the role of the commission and legislative ex officio members, and noted that the proposal had reached tentative agreement and would next go to hearings before the commission and the House. She said the commission and tribe have a long-standing collaborative relationship. Lummi Nation Vice Chairman Terence Adams and other tribal representatives described the tribe’s gaming history and the purpose of the amendment. The proposal would add or update compact provisions for higher table and lottery limits, extension of credit to customers, electronic table games, and conforming definition changes. Tribal representatives said the changes would support tribal governmental services and economic development while maintaining strong regulation and internal controls. Commission staff said similar provisions have already been approved for other tribes and that the tribe would be responsible for setting responsible credit limits and controls, including customer vetting and self-exclusion checks. Senator Hasegawa asked about how credit would work and what oversight would apply, and staff said they would follow up with more detail. Senator Fortunato clarified that the request was for Lummi to receive provisions already available in other tribal compacts. Committee members also asked about the timing of public comment, and staff said it would be taken at the end of the hearing if any was signed up. No public comment was offered, and the chair closed the hearing without any vote or formal action taken by the committee.

Transcript Highlights:

• </c><01:26:47.120><c> Comp</c> think that the Nurse Compact Comp think that the Nurse Compact Comp Compact
• </c> keeping the compact out. Thank you. keeping the compact out. Thank you.
• </c> nurse lure compact. nurse lure compact.
• Uh, the thing with compacts, this isn't my language. This is the compact language for that.
• Uh, the thing with compacts, this isn't my language. This is the compact language for that.

Bills: HF1925

Committee: House Health Finance and Policy

Transcript Highlights:

• So I do think that this helps with the compact.
• There are about 30 states already in the compact.
• I'm a big fan of compacts.
• I will keep my testimony compact.
• So there are currently, there's only the one compact.

Committee: House Elementary and Secondary Education

Transcript Highlights:

• I didn't want to get onto the compact. Here we go.
• How many states have joined this compact? Mr. Chair and Senator 43.
• compact, not the way we're setting it out because the compact that we've adopted right now already has
• How many, how many times did New Mexico in isolation from the compact?
• Who would pay it under this compact? Who pays the levy? Mr.

Committee: Senate Senate Judiciary

Transcript Highlights:

• I believe the lack of compactness, there was a lack of compactness. That would be a reason.
• I believe the lack of compactness. There was a lack of compactness.
• I believe the lack of compactness, there was a lack of compactness. That would be a reason.
• I believe the lack of compactness. There was a lack of compactness.
• It's less compact.

Summary: The Senate convened in special session with an opening prayer and the Pledge of Allegiance, then moved to the special order calendar to consider congressional redistricting legislation, beginning with Senate Bill 8D and then substituting the identical House Bill 1D. The bill would establish Florida’s congressional districts. Senator Gaetz, presenting the measure, said the Governor had proposed the map to address population growth and to draw race-neutral districts, and argued that mid-decade redistricting is legally permissible and has occurred before in Florida and other states. He repeatedly said the Legislature could accept, reject, or amend the proposal, but that the Governor had the prerogative to propose it. The floor debate focused heavily on the legality and timing of the map, especially after the U.S. Supreme Court’s Louisiana redistricting decision was announced during the session. Several senators, including Rouson, Sharief, Smith, Polsky, Arrington, Bracy Davis, Bernard, Nathan, and Berman, questioned whether the map complied with the Florida Constitution’s Fair Districts Amendment, the Voting Rights Act, and equal protection principles. They raised concerns about the short notice, lack of statewide public hearings, the use of partisan data, the absence of sworn testimony from the Governor’s representatives, the claimed severability of the Fair Districts Amendment, and the impact on minority communities and communities of interest. Gaetz generally declined to offer legal opinions, saying those issues would ultimately be for the courts, but he relayed the Governor’s position that race-based provisions in the Fair Districts Amendment are unconstitutional and that the proposed map is race-neutral and compact. Members also debated whether the map’s population data and compactness scores justified the district lines, with critics arguing that the plan cracked and split communities in places such as Central Florida, Tampa Bay, and South Florida. Gaetz said the Governor’s office relied on 2020 census data plus updated population estimates from the Office of Economic and Demographic Research and the American Community Survey, and that the mapmaker said he drew the map himself without outside consultants. After questions concluded, the Senate adopted a motion to substitute HB 1D for SB 8D, read the bill a third time, and proceeded to debate the House bill. The transcript ends during debate, with no final vote on passage shown.

Transcript Highlights:

• I believe the lack of compactness, there was a lack of compactness. That would be a reason.
• I believe the lack of compactness. There was a lack of compactness.
• I believe the lack of compactness, there was a lack of compactness. That would be a reason.
• I believe the lack of compactness. There was a lack of compactness.
• It's less compact.

Transcript Highlights:

• . >> So, House Bill 36, um, the sub adds on the athletic trainers and dietitians to this compact.
• We're working with Interstate Compact.
• Athletic trainers are vital compact.
• </c> compacts? Okay. Senator Hickden. compacts? Okay. Senator Hickden.
• </c> compact bill. compact bill.

Committee: Senate Licensing & Occupations

Transcript Highlights:

• The changes in the 2021 compact also included the establishment of the compact trust fund.
• Madam Chair, I guess if it's in the compact, is it in the compact or is it just being discussed?
• Senator Leach, the tribes have all signed the compact and the state has signed the compact.
• The description of how you calculate the disbursements of the Compact Trust Fund are in the compact,
• We want to make ...the compact and the state has signed the compact.

Committee: Senate Senate Regulatory Affairs & Government Efficiency Committee of Reference

Summary: The committee first heard the Arizona Auditor General’s 2025 sunset review of the Arizona Barbering and Cosmetology Board. The audit found the board generally processed licenses and complaints timely and had adopted required school curriculum rules, but it also identified inconsistent disciplinary actions, gaps in required infection-prevention and law education for some reciprocity and instructor applicants, weak application review controls, and noncompliance issues involving open meeting law, public records, and conflicts of interest. Auditors also recommended statutory changes on esthetics scope of practice, cease-and-desist authority, and eyelash technician training standards. The board’s executive director said the agency agreed with the findings, had already implemented some changes including updated disciplinary parameters, conflict-of-interest training, lawful presence verification, and revised cash-handling procedures, and was working through the remaining recommendations. After questions, the committee voted 7-0 to recommend the board implement the audit recommendations and be continued for six years, until July 1, 2032. The committee then took up the combined sunset review and performance audit of the Arizona Department of Gaming, the Arizona Racing Commission, and the Arizona Boxing and Mixed Martial Arts Commission. The Auditor General reported that while the department distributed tribal gaming funds and issued some licenses appropriately, it failed to consistently obtain and review required independent audit reports for event wagering and fantasy sports operators, did not fully comply with conflict-of-interest disclosure requirements, lacked comprehensive complaint-handling processes, and had delayed some compact trust fund distributions. Additional issues included IT security documentation, horse-racing suitability checks, fee-setting reviews, rulemaking, and public records procedures; the Boxing and MMA Commission also had licensing and fee-setting deficiencies. The department and commissions agreed to implement the recommendations, and the department director said the agency was already making changes, including updated guidance to operators, a new complaint-tracking process, conflict-of-interest training, and work on trust fund distributions and rule changes. Committee members pressed both the auditor and the department on why fantasy sports audit reviews had not been completed, whether underpayments would be recovered, and why no distributions had yet been made to certain Category 3 tribes under the 2021 compact trust fund. The director said the department was now doing a look-back review, would seek any owed fees, penalties, and interest, and was helping tribes resolve the baseline-revenue formula needed for distributions. Members also asked about conflict-of-interest practices, problem gambling, and whether prediction markets fall under gaming regulation. The discussion continued into the department’s broader presentation, with the director describing the agency’s regulatory role and ongoing modernization efforts.

Transcript Highlights:

• The compact would allow that portability to travel within the compact states.
• </c> we're going to have to pick a compact we're going to have to pick a compact and<02:02:02.760><c>
• <02:02:34.520><c> to</c><02:02:34.599><c> be</c> compact to be compact to be recognized<02:02:36.679>
• </c><02:03:25.400><c> had</c> language that the compact had language that the compact had established
• So the compact license requirements would apply to someone getting a compact license.

Committee: Senate Executive Departments and Administration

Transcript Highlights:

• So, we're instrumental that compact.
• </c><00:19:27.840><c> So</c> first of all um with the compact. So first of all um with the compact.
• Um, our organization is very compact.
• </c> didn't communicate with the compact didn't communicate with the compact ahead<00:25:50.559><c> of
• </c> been working closely with the compact. been working closely with the compact.

Committee: Senate Licensing & Occupations

Transcript Highlights:

• pathology compact, and an occupational therapy compact.
• compact, an emergency medical services compact, a nurse's licensure compact, and a physical therapy
• compact, just to name a few of the medical compacts.
• This compact is the gold standard when it comes to interstate compacts.
• I am in full agreeance with compacts, compacts, compacts.

Summary: The House convened with prayer and the Pledge of Allegiance, then approved the House Journal by roll call vote, 114-1. Members spent a large portion of the morning introducing guests and recognizing visitors, including career and technical education students, FFA and FCCLA groups, school leaders, interns, a physician of the day, and a Black History Month personal privilege honoring inventor Alice H. Parker and her early central heating design. The chamber then took up several bills for perfection and printing. House Bill 1847, the Missouri Dental and Dental Hygienist Compact, was presented as a workforce and access-to-care measure; members cited dental shortages and broad professional support, and it was ordered perfected and printed. House Bill 1866, dealing with peace officer licensure, was presented as allowing the Department of Public Safety to deny applicants whose licenses were revoked or suspended elsewhere and to require U.S. citizenship; an amendment to allow lawful permanent residents who honorably served in the military to qualify was debated at length but failed 95-52, and the bill was then ordered perfected and printed. House Bill 1908, with a companion bill, was described by its sponsor as ending a Missouri rule that delays divorce when a spouse is pregnant; supporters framed it as a due process and safety issue, especially for abuse survivors, and it was adopted and ordered perfected and printed. House Bill 1961, creating temporary licensure and a compact for dietitians, and House Bill 2180, changing Department of Revenue notice delivery options for blind pension recipients and taxpayers to include first-class mail and electronic delivery, both drew support as workforce or accessibility measures and were ordered perfected and printed after amendments. House Bill 2591, which would let speech-language pathologists count clinical fellowship experience completed in any state toward Missouri licensure, also passed perfection and printing. The House then moved to announcements and recessed until 2 p.m.

Transcript Highlights:

• Speaker, this is the Dental Compact Bill.
• With a compact, you pay a fee to the compact and you're allowed to go across state lines without getting
• It says that our state will enact a compact that is, quote, not materially different from the model compact
• Lady, I have not read the model compact.
• This is a basic licensing compact.

Summary: The House opened with prayer, the Pledge of Allegiance, and approval of the previous day’s journal by a 119-0 vote. Members then used personal privilege remarks to recognize a 40th wedding anniversary, honor Sherry Anderson for her service to the House, and observe Black History Month with a tribute to former Senator Yvonne Starks-Wilson. The chamber also welcomed several guest groups, including representatives from the Alzheimer’s Association, the Festus girls cross-country team, the Blue Springs Chamber of Commerce Leadership Conference, and advocates connected to the blind pension fund. The main floor debate centered on House Committee Substitute for House Bills 2033, 1608, 1672, and 1854, which would remove the sunset from the SAFE Act and continue restrictions on gender-affirming care for minors. Supporters argued the bill protects children, citing concerns about puberty blockers, hormones, surgery, and evolving medical guidance; opponents said it targets transgender youth, interferes with family and medical decisions, and misstates the science. After extended debate, the previous question was adopted 102-45, and the combined bill package passed 102-40. House Bill 1847, creating the Dental Licensure Compact, also passed 138-10 after questions about reciprocity, data sharing, and state sovereignty. The House then passed House Committee Substitute for House Bill 1866, which bars peace officer licensure for applicants whose certification was revoked or suspended and for non-citizens, by a 101-36 vote after debate over citizenship, military service, and law enforcement standards. House Committee Substitute for House Bills 1908 and 2337 passed 147-0; the sponsor described it as protecting women and children in abusive situations and addressing legal responsibility in marriage. House Bill 1961, allowing temporary dietitian licenses and a compact for interstate practice, passed 137-8. House Bill 2180, changing Department of Revenue and blind pension notice delivery methods and allowing electronic notices, passed 146-0 and was described as both a service improvement and a cost saver. House Bill 2591, updating speech-language pathologist licensure to allow out-of-state training and practice in Missouri, passed 144-0. The House then announced upcoming committee meetings, a Scouting America Eagle Scout recognition, an America 250 celebration event, and a Labor Caucus meeting before adjourning until Monday, February 16, 2026.

Transcript Highlights:

• physician assistants licensed in other states to practice in North Dakota under a compact privilege.
• I did walk through the provisions of the compact in quite a bit of detail last time.
• Are we saying that is also needed in here, or it's already in this one or this compact?
• So there is nothing that relates to the occupational therapy compact that's in this bill.
• They'd be practicing under what's a compact privilege.

Summary: The committee reviewed four bill drafts for the Rural Health Transformation effort. The first required the presidential physical fitness test in PE classes; members asked about DPI and school support, then moved and approved the draft. The second required physicians to complete one hour of continuing education on nutrition and metabolic health each renewal cycle and included legislative intent encouraging other health boards to consider nutrition-related CE; it was approved after brief discussion. The third bill adopted the Physician Assistant Licensure Compact. Members discussed a separate issue involving occupational therapy compact background checks and whether that fix could be added now or would need to wait until later; the committee also discussed Board of Medicine input and the compact’s workforce benefits. The draft was moved forward to the full committee. The fourth bill expanded pharmacists’ prescriptive authority and therapeutic substitution. Legislative Council explained the draft, and Senator Roars proposed substantial amendments to narrow motion sickness, UTI, diabetes supply, and substitution provisions. Members debated whether to vote on amendments now or wait for the special session public hearing; concerns were raised about transparency, stakeholder input, and avoiding premature action. No amendment vote was taken, and the bill was left for later consideration. The committee then recessed until the next day.

Transcript Highlights:

• an American Indian tribe on a proposed compact with the legislature.
• For compact amendments, our ex officios do become voting members.
• So you have completed that first part, the compact negotiation with the director.
• I had not heard about that in other tribal compacts.
• I appreciate the committee's time to hear the proposed amendments to the compact.

Summary: The Senate Business, Financial Services and Trade Committee held a public hearing on a proposed amendment to the Washington State tribal gaming compact involving the Lummi Nation. Tina Griffin of the Washington State Gambling Commission explained the compact amendment process under the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act and said the state and tribe had reached tentative agreement. She noted the commission’s role, the legislature’s 30-day hearing window, and that the proposal would next go to a commission hearing and then potentially to the governor for review. Lummi Nation representatives, including Vice Chair Terence Adams and tribal gaming officials, said the amendments would update their compact to add higher gaming limits, allow extension of credit to customers, and authorize electronic table games, along with conforming definition changes. They described tribal gaming as an important source of revenue for governmental services, infrastructure, and jobs, and said the proposed changes would be regulated through internal controls and the Lummi Tribal Gaming Commission to protect game integrity and customer welfare. Senator Hasegawa asked several questions about how customer credit would work, what limits would apply, and what oversight would exist. Commission staff said the detailed framework and limits would be set by the tribe after approval, with responsible gaming safeguards such as know-your-customer procedures and self-exclusion checks. Staff also said similar compact provisions had already been approved for other tribes, and that the tribe would follow applicable federal requirements such as the Bank Secrecy Act. No public comment was offered, and the committee closed the hearing without taking a vote.

Transcript Highlights:

• The Interstate Teacher Mobility Compact is simply an occupational compact that increases flexibility
• </c> used throughout the compact. used throughout the compact.
• the requirements of the compact.
• </c> requirements of the compact. requirements of the compact.
• </c> Teacher Mobility Compact Commission. Teacher Mobility Compact Commission.

Committee: Senate State and Local Government

Transcript Highlights:

• that their compactness scores are roughly the same as those of the That their compactness scores are
• I believe the lack of compactness, there was a lack of compactness. That would be a reason.
• I believe the lack of compactness. There was a lack of compactness.
• The compactness overall of the map is the same as the compactness of the underlying map, the one that
• It's less compact.

Transcript Highlights:

• With the compact, military spouses with a multi-state license from a compact state would not need to
• other compact member states.
• From a regulatory perspective, the Which is also governed via compact.
• From a regulatory perspective, the cosmetology licensure compact preserves the authority of each compact
• Just like the five occupational licensure compacts that Texas is already a member of, this compact will

Committee: Senate Business & Commerce

Summary: The Senate Committee on Business and Commerce met with a quorum and took up a long list of pending House bills, most of them on motions by Senator King or Senator Campbell. The committee adopted committee substitutes and favorably reported numerous bills, including HB 252, HB 700, HB 1500, HB 1545, HB 1562, HB 1732, HB 267, HB 2213, HB 2221, HB 2520, HB 2818, HB 3016, HB 3214, HB 3250, HB 3512, HB 3623, HB 3689, HB 3833, HB 4063, HB 4395, HB 4690, HB 4751, HB 5331, HB 3824, HB 4464, HB 4468, and HB 5247. Most of these were sent to the local and uncontested calendar, while some, including sunset and other significant measures, were reported to the full Senate. HB 146 was the only bill reported out on a divided vote, passing 6 ayes to 4 nays. Several bills received brief explanation of committee substitute changes. HB 3016, dealing with rental car collision damage waivers and stolen vehicles, was amended to change a cooperation standard from “fully cooperate” to simply “cooperate.” HB 3689, a major ESF/TWA financing bill, was described as making technical changes to align terminology with the Comptroller’s authority and to avoid creating state debt or new liability. HB 5247, a capital cost recovery bill for transmission in the Permian Basin, was revised to clarify how the new mechanism fits with existing Utilities Code provisions and to add a 2035 expiration date. HB 3824, the battery fire safety bill, also received technical changes to align terminology with industry usage. The committee heard public testimony on several pending measures. HB 3069, which would direct the PUC to develop supplemental multi-decade planning criteria for transmission certificates in ERCOT, drew support from industry, environmental, and manufacturing witnesses who said it would help address congestion costs while balancing consumer protections; the bill was left pending. HB 5196, requiring state agencies to adopt and post telework policies and use written telework agreements, received both support and concern: supporters said it would preserve productivity and retention, while a senator raised concerns about notice and family logistics; it was left pending after testimony. HB 3112, allowing closed deliberations on cybersecurity policy details, was laid out and left pending after brief discussion. HCR 102, supporting federal nuclear tax credits, drew testimony from nuclear industry and energy advocates, who argued the credits are essential for existing plants, new nuclear development, grid reliability, and U.S. competitiveness; the resolution was left pending, with discussion about whether the language should focus more exclusively on nuclear. HB 705, creating a cosmetology licensure compact, was supported by industry, employers, and compact experts as a mobility tool that preserves state authority; HB 3516, expanding a public information exemption for Railroad Commission administrative law judges and technical examiners, and HB 3388, authorizing group property and casualty coverage for personal lines, were also heard and left pending. At the end of the meeting, the committee recessed subject to the call of the chair.

Transcript Highlights:

• District 27, in a similar way, is a very compact district, maybe one of the most compact districts on
• So District 18 is a very compact district, almost entirely.
• You talked about how you focused on compactness. Does this plan increase the compactness scores?
• But looked at in totality, it's consistently compact, and those compactness decisions were made throughout
• We want them to be compact.

Summary: The Committee on Rules met with a quorum present and took up a presentation from the Governor’s office on proposed congressional reapportionment. Executive Office of the Governor counsel Mo Jazeel argued that mid-cycle congressional redistricting is legally permissible, that race should not be used in drawing districts, and that the Florida Fair Districts provisions are inconsistent with federal equal protection principles and, in the executive branch’s view, are inseverable. Jason Parada then presented the proposed map, explaining that it was drawn using 2020 census block data, with county growth estimates used only as a guide, and that the plan was designed to be race-neutral while also considering compactness, county and municipal boundaries, and other traditional redistricting criteria. He said the map keeps 48 counties and 382 municipalities whole, has compactness scores comparable to the current map, and makes the largest changes in South Florida, with some districts remaining unchanged and others reconfigured around population shifts and geographic boundaries. Members questioned both presenters extensively about the legal basis for disregarding the Fair Districts Amendment, the use of partisan data, the absence of racial analysis, and whether the map truly reflects population growth. Jazeel said the executive branch’s position is that race-based provisions in the state constitution cannot be used if they conflict with the U.S. Constitution, and that the forthcoming U.S. Supreme Court decision in Louisiana v. Calais could further clarify the law. Parada said he did not use race in drawing the map, did use partisan information as one of several traditional criteria, and relied on 2020 census data for population equality. Senators also pressed him on who reviewed the map, why the public and legislators had limited time to review it, and whether the plan was intended to favor Republicans; Parada denied partisan intent and said he was the only person who moved lines on the map, though he consulted with other Executive Office of the Governor staff and counsel. Several senators raised concerns that the map did not clearly reflect Florida’s recent population growth, that some districts remained highly irregular, and that the plan appeared to be based on a legal theory contingent on future court rulings. The presenters responded that congressional districts must be equal to the person, that growth estimates can only guide orientation rather than replace census data, and that the map was designed to preserve as much of the existing structure as possible while making the largest adjustments in South Florida. No vote or final action on the map was taken during the excerpted portion of the meeting, and the committee continued with questions and discussion.

Transcript Highlights:

• And that it also improves compactness.
• Is that compact?
• Is that compact? It is as compact as many, many congressional districts around the state are today.
• And it's more compact.
• Does that sound compact to you? It does not sound compact, and it surprised me when I saw it.

Bills: SB 2 , SB 5 , SB 9 , SB 7 , SB 17 , SB 4 , HB4 , HB1 , HB3 , HB20 , HB22 , SB9 , SB7 , SB17 , SB4 , HB4 , SB2 , SB5

Transcript Highlights:

• , having to do with the physician assistant licensure compact.
• So with a compact, it does mean that the criteria have to be acceptable, Compact, it does mean that the
• So with a compact, it does mean that the criteria have to be acceptable, compact, it does mean that the
• compact, and social work.
• So North Dakota has been very forward-thinking in adopting these compacts as they have come along.

Summary: The Health Care Task Force reconvened to hear reports from its divisions. The Appropriations Division reviewed a draft bill appropriating $198 million in federal grant funds for the current year and another $198 million for the next grant year, authorizing DHS to transfer funds within its budget, allowing OMB to adjust federal fund authority for related grants, speeding procurement and bulk purchasing, requiring grant recipients to acknowledge the temporary nature of the funding, and mandating periodic reporting. After questions were answered to the division’s satisfaction, the committee voted to forward the appropriations bill draft to Legislative Management. The Policy Division then reviewed four bills. One would require the presidential physical fitness test to be included in high school physical education; another would require physicians to complete one hour of continuing education on nutrition and metabolic health each renewal cycle; a third would add physician assistants to the interstate licensure compact framework; and a fourth would authorize limited pharmacist prescriptive authority and therapeutic substitution. Members generally supported the first three measures and noted that the pharmacist bill had been amended in discussion but was left in its current form so stakeholders could comment before the special session. The division also discussed that all four policy bills were tied to the federal grant funding and that failure to pass them, or changing them in a way that reduced CMS scoring, could reduce or eliminate funding. Department officials confirmed that if any of the bills failed or were altered in a way that lowered the score, the state could lose money and could not make up the points elsewhere. Members raised concerns about the physical fitness bill, including possible exemptions for students with severe illnesses or physical limitations, and noted the need for DPI input. Leadership indicated the special session hearings would likely begin Wednesday morning. The committee then approved a motion for Legislative Council to prepare a committee report for Legislative Management and adjourned, noting the task force may need to remain available during the special session.