Video & Transcript Research : 'Type C'
Page 17 of 500
MN
Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session
Conference Committee on H.F. 2438 - Transportation Omnibus - 05/15/25
Transcript Highlights:
- c><00:02:12.080><c> servicec><00:02:12.800><c> uhc> type services, lift and Uber service uh type
- services, lift and Uber service uh type<00:02:13.360><c> availablec><00:02:14.040><c> toc><00:02
- :15.200><c> uhc><00:02:15.360><c> ourc><00:02:16.160><c> disabilitiesc> type available to uh our
- And it's really to deliver<00:04:44.400><c> TNCc><00:04:44.960><c> typec><00:04:45.280><c> services
- c><00:04:46.720><c> umc><00:04:46.880><c> toc><00:04:47.199><c> peoplec> deliver TNC type services
MN
Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session
Minnesota Zoo bonding request 3/5/26
Minnesota House Floor Meeting
Transcript Highlights:
- ><c> threec><00:01:14.680><c> typesc><00:01:14.960><c> ofc><00:01:15.040><c> hair.
- ><c> typesc><00:03:08.160><c> ofc><00:03:08.320><c> foodc><00:03:08.560><c> thatc><00:03:08.720
- ><c> shec><00:03:08.920><c> willc> her favorite types of food that she will her favorite types of
- c><00:10:05.160><c> ofc> working outside through all types of working outside through all types of
- typesc><00:17:19.400><c> ofc><00:17:19.480><c> thingsc><00:17:19.679><c> willc><00:17:19.760
Summary:
The Minnesota Zoo presented its infrastructure and animal health needs to the committee, beginning with an educational demonstration featuring Aspen, a North American porcupine. Staff used the animal to explain porcupine biology and correct common myths, including that porcupines cannot shoot their quills and that the quills are not poisonous. Members asked about the animal’s natural predators and care, and staff explained that porcupines are protected by their quills but can still be preyed on by animals such as bobcats, cougars, great horned owls, and fishers.
Zoo leadership then shifted to the facility request, describing the zoo as a major state attraction and education center with about 1.4 to 1.5 million annual visitors, nearly 100,000 students served, and significant economic impact. They said the 50-year-old campus is in poor condition, with a third of its 125 structures in poor or crisis condition and more than $78 million in deferred maintenance, creating safety risks for visitors, staff, and animals. The zoo said it is seeking to use the governor’s recommended $4 million for critical life-support and infrastructure needs.
The main funding request discussed was an additional $6 million for the zoo’s animal hospital project. Zoo officials explained that the original plan for a standalone new hospital was no longer affordable, so they are now proposing a new wing attached to the existing A Building hospital. The extra funds would renovate A Building for staff, storage, and support spaces, remove asbestos, meet code, and improve safety so the new hospital can function as intended. Members asked about incidents at the zoo, and staff described examples such as close calls with animal enclosures and injuries tied to aging facilities and outdated equipment. No vote or formal action was taken in the transcript.
MN
Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session
Elections Finance and Government Operations Committee 3/2/26
Elections Finance and Government Operations
Transcript Highlights:
- > certainc><00:07:15.600><c> typesc><00:07:15.880><c> ofc><00:07:16.000><c> housing.
- c><00:07:16.560><c> Villac> role in certain types of housing.
- <c> homec><00:07:33.800><c> buyersc><00:07:34.280><c> arec><00:07:34.440><c> notc> housing types
- :42:12.920><c> thatc><00:42:13.840><c> uhc><00:42:14.160><c> typec><00:42:14.440><c> ofc><00:
- c><00:42:15.600><c> Umc> in some of that uh type of thing. Um in some of that uh type of thing.
Keywords:
homeowners associations, local government, building permits, housing policy, residential development, voter access, polling place, elections, ballot, unexpected needs, election judge, public information, political parties, transparency, 1183, house
Summary:
The committee took up House File 2614, a bill aimed at preventing local governments from requiring or effectively mandating homeowners associations (HOAs) as a condition of residential development approval. The committee first approved the February 25 minutes, then adopted the DE1 amendment to HF 2614 before hearing the bill. The authors said the measure is a bipartisan piece of a larger HOA reform effort and that the language was negotiated with the League of Minnesota Cities and other stakeholders; they emphasized that developers could still choose to create HOAs, but cities and counties could not require them.
Testimony in support came from Housing First Minnesota and the Minnesota Homeownership Center. Supporters argued that unnecessary HOAs raise housing costs, reduce affordability, and are often used to shift public infrastructure costs onto homeowners. They said HOAs remain appropriate for shared-wall housing, shared amenities, and other situations where common property is truly needed, but should not be imposed for single-family developments or minor features. Several members shared examples of HOA overreach and asked for clarification on how the bill would work, including whether developers could still request neighborhood signs or other features; staff and the authors said that would still be possible if the developer requested it rather than the local government requiring it.
A significant portion of the discussion focused on stormwater ponds and other infrastructure. One member said the bill should not prevent cities from requiring stormwater facilities because maintenance costs and water-quality responsibilities can be substantial and should not be shifted to all taxpayers. The authors responded that the amendment language was intended to balance concerns about unnecessary HOA mandates with the need to address maintenance, noting that some maintenance responsibilities could remain with cities or be handled through developer agreements. A member requested a roll call on the bill, but the transcript does not include a final vote or disposition beyond the discussion and amendment adoption.
MN
Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session
House State Government Finance and Policy Committee 2/25/25
State Government Finance and Policy
Transcript Highlights:
- :04:15.239><c> questionc><00:04:15.599><c> whatc><00:04:15.799><c> typec><00:04:16.000><c> of
- 20.840><c> typec><00:05:21.319><c> spacec><00:05:22.319><c> umc><00:05:23.120><c> forc> on a
- ><c> typec><00:13:12.480><c> ofc><00:13:12.680><c> investmentc> that is worth that type of investment
- 32:37.440><c> somec><00:32:37.679><c> typec><00:32:37.840><c> ofc> intrum um you know some type
- ><c> samec><01:41:12.000><c> typesc><01:41:12.280><c> ofc> very quickly these are the same types
NH
New Hampshire 2025 Regular Session
Commission to Study Costs of Special Education (12/19/2025)
Transcript Highlights:
- 10:45.279><c> wasc><00:10:45.440><c> typingc> Ford.
- c> typec><00:35:28.079><c> ofc> policies and procedures and that type of policies and procedures
- ><c> andc><00:39:58.160><c> thatc><00:39:58.400><c> typec><00:39:58.560><c> ofc><00:39:58.720
- ><c> thingc><00:39:59.520><c> andc> procedures and that type of thing and procedures and that type
- $250,000c><01:11:45.840><c> typec><01:11:46.080><c> kid,c> student, $250,000 type kid, student
Summary:
The commission met to review and amend the minutes from its previous meeting, correcting the date, several spelling and wording errors, and clarifying references to a scholarship fund and a member’s title. The minutes were then approved as amended, with some members abstaining because they were not present at the prior meeting. The chair then turned to the commission’s work plan under SB 57, emphasizing the need to prioritize the statutory topics and identify which issues require additional research, documentation, and possible spreadsheets.
Members discussed a broad range of special education cost drivers and policy questions, including student referral rates, why students are classified as other health impaired, whether referrals increased after COVID school closures, intervention processes before referral, the cost of services required under IEPs and 504 plans, differences between federal law, state law, and DOE rules, reporting of special education costs, out-of-district and residential placements, district sharing of resources, dispute resolution, graduation rates, and adult learning outcomes. Several members raised concerns that school environments, mental health, bullying, and possible overidentification may be contributing to rising special education numbers and costs, while others cautioned that some reported district percentages may be inflated or unclear because of how the data are counted.
A major portion of the meeting focused on HB 742, which would eliminate prorated special education aid when state appropriations are insufficient and require the governor to draw a warrant to cover shortfalls. Representative Ames explained that the bill had been recommended for interim study because the commission is already examining special education costing, and he highlighted the gap between FY24 special education costs of about $977.1 million and state aid of $33.9 million for catastrophic aid, $67.4 million for differentiated aid, and $50.8 million in federal IDEA funds, leaving local districts to cover about $825.1 million. He argued the commission should ultimately make clear that both the federal government and the state should contribute more.
The Department of Education, through Melissa White, answered questions about data and oversight. She said special education counts come from IEPs entered into the state system using SASIDs, that DOE monitors districts through both desk audits and on-site visits, and that billing is checked against the services listed in each student’s IEP. She also said DOE’s special education work is largely federally funded, with roughly $56.7 million received through IDEA this year and about $49.1 million flowing through to LEAs, while the department retains a small amount for administration and statewide support activities. Members also discussed how adequacy calculations use special education counts from the state system and how those figures are reported.
MN
Minnesota 2025 1st Special Session
House Housing Finance and Policy Committee 3/11/25
Housing Finance and Policy
Transcript Highlights:
- c><00:03:52.040><c> typesc><00:03:52.280><c> ofc> large conglomeration of those types of large
- conglomeration of those types of homes<00:03:53.319><c> andc><00:03:53.439><c> here'sc><00:03:54.000
- 53.720><c> differentc><00:28:54.000><c> typesc><00:28:54.240><c> ofc><00:28:54.360><c> people
- c><00:28:54.519><c> toc><00:28:54.679><c> ourc> many different types of people to our many different
- 37.800><c> comec><01:19:38.000><c> fromc><01:19:38.199><c> allc><01:19:38.360><c> typesc> think
MN
Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session
Regulating Artificial Intelligence / Legislation to Stop Dangerous Deepfakes Mar 16th, 2025
Minnesota Senate Floor Meeting
Transcript Highlights:
- we do want to attract those types<00:08:02.000><c> ofc><00:08:02.199><c> companiesc><00:08:02.840
- ><c> butc><00:08:02.960><c> wec><00:08:03.120><c> certainlyc><00:08:03.520><c> arec> types of
- situationc><00:08:53.800><c> thesec><00:08:53.920><c> arec><00:08:54.360><c> billionairesc> type
- thatc><00:19:57.000><c> thisc><00:19:57.159><c> typec><00:19:57.360><c> ofc><00:19:57.640><c>
- Technologyc><00:19:58.760><c> canc> argue that this type of Technology can argue that this type
MN
Transcript Highlights:
- on any other confession of judgment on any other property<00:31:25.360><c> typec><00:31:26.360><c>
- all other property types<00:32:22.919><c> arec><00:32:23.080><c> beingc><00:32:23.320><c> charged
- c><00:32:23.799><c> onlyc> types are being charged only types are being charged only 8%<00:32:26.360
- c><00:43:53.319><c> thosec><00:43:53.559><c> differentc><00:43:53.880><c> typesc><00:43:54.119
- ><c> ofc> starts to bring those different types of starts to bring those different types of property
NH
New Hampshire 2025 Regular Session
House Labor, Industrial and Rehabilitative Services (10/22/2025)
Labor, Industrial and Rehabilitative Services
Transcript Highlights:
- <00:41:36.880><c> bringc><00:41:37.040><c> anyc><00:41:37.200><c> typec><00:41:37.359><c> ofc
- > typesc><00:44:38.800><c> ofc><00:44:38.960><c> codesc><00:44:39.920><c> thatc><00:44:40.240
- > ofc><00:48:52.800><c> certainc><00:48:53.040><c> typesc><00:48:53.280><c> ofc> the exception
- atc><00:50:47.520><c> certainc><00:50:47.839><c> typesc> would we need to look at certain types
- ><c> thatc><02:04:58.480><c> thec><02:04:58.719><c> otherc><02:04:58.960><c> typesc> >>
NH
New Hampshire 2025 Regular Session
House Municipal and County Government (04/28/2025)
Municipal and County Government
Transcript Highlights:
- ><c> typec><00:32:43.360><c> ofc><00:32:43.519><c> ac><00:32:43.760><c> noticec><00:32:44.720
- So<01:08:13.200><c> inc><01:08:13.440><c> thatc><01:08:13.680><c> typec><01:08:14.400><c> toc
- umc><01:59:28.800><c> typec> um do research and provide this um type um do research and provide
- c> typesc><02:01:02.080><c> ofc><02:01:02.239><c> taxes.
- c><02:01:02.719><c> Onec><02:01:02.880><c> ofc><02:01:02.880><c> thec> down the types of taxes
MN
Minnesota 2025 1st Special Session
House Workforce, Labor, and Economic Development Finance and Policy Committee 2/19/25
Workforce, Labor, and Economic Development Finance and Policy
Transcript Highlights:
- typec><00:03:23.760><c> ofc><00:03:23.959><c> therapyc><00:03:24.480><c> hasc><00:03:24.640>
- those types of until they break down those types of things<00:10:34.240><c> soc><00:10:34.360><c>
- <c> typec><00:52:20.440><c> ofc><00:52:20.559><c> thec><00:52:21.119><c> phonec><00:52:22.119
- ><c> umc><00:52:22.319><c> wec> issue tells the type of the phone um we issue tells the type of the
- ><c> typesc><01:04:14.640><c> ofc> um of the of the different types of um of the of the different
NH
Transcript Highlights:
- c> types of projects.
- ><c> typesc><01:16:10.080><c> ofc><01:16:10.239><c> residentialc> very normal for all types of
- typec><03:05:46.319><c> ofc><03:05:46.479><c> development.
- typesc><03:05:51.040><c> ofc> parking to zone out certain types of parking to zone out certain types
- <c> isc><03:26:07.120><c> thec><03:26:07.279><c> typec><03:26:07.439><c> ofc><03:26:07.520><c
MN
Transcript Highlights:
- 10:15.000><c> muchc><00:10:15.160><c> itc><00:10:15.360><c> costc><00:10:15.839><c> typec><00
- when we start<00:26:15.039><c> conductingc><00:26:15.520><c> thisc><00:26:15.760><c> typec><00
- :26:16.039><c> ofc><00:26:16.840><c> ofc><00:26:17.120><c> updatec> start conducting this type
- ><c> toc><00:42:53.760><c> havec><00:42:53.960><c> thisc><00:42:54.119><c> typec><00:42:54.280
- type of hearing right<00:42:55.319><c> toc><00:42:55.480><c> showc><00:42:55.839><c> thatc><00:
Summary:
The Senate Finance Committee met on January 9, 2025, to focus on internal controls, fraud prevention, and legislative oversight of state agencies. Legislative Auditor Judy Randall explained Minnesota’s internal control framework, based on the GAO Green Book, and described five core controls: assigning responsibility, separating duties, restricting access, maintaining policies and procedures, and keeping records. She tied each control to examples from recent audits, including DHS’s Medicaid provider debt recovery, the Minnesota State Academies’ travel reimbursement issue, privileged access at the Minnesota State Lottery, missing mileage-verification procedures at the Board of Firefighter Training and Education, and weak documentation in the Board on Aging’s senior nutrition program.
Deputy Legislative Auditor Jod Mson Rodriguez then presented a new follow-up report on implementation of prior recommendations from 2022 through 2024, including special reviews. She said the office gathers agency documentation, evaluates progress, and categorizes recommendations from implemented to not applicable, while noting that some items require more work to verify and that this reflects OLA capacity rather than agency performance. Examples included the Department of Commerce, where some policy changes were verified but further work would be needed to confirm consistent investigator compliance, and the Metropolitan Council, where more data analysis would be needed to determine whether bonus payments were properly earned. She also noted that a legislature-directed recommendation to require grant manager training had not been implemented.
Overall, OLA reported that state agencies had implemented or partially implemented close to 70% of its recommendations, while the legislature had implemented or partially implemented about 40% of recommendations from the last three years. Members generally praised the office’s work and discussed how agencies respond after reports are issued. Senator Westrom raised concerns about a recent media report on alleged fraud in CCAP, and Randall said OLA was aware of the issue but could not discuss details. Senator Draheim asked about post-report agency engagement, and Randall and Rodriguez said follow-up varies, with some agencies seeking private meetings and others engaging less, but that the follow-up process often prompts further discussion and improvement.
KY
Transcript Highlights:
- c><00:01:18.440><c> Wec><00:01:18.640><c> havec><00:01:18.800><c> ac><00:01:18.880><c> quorum
- doc><00:01:22.000><c> havec><00:01:22.360><c> memberc><00:01:22.640><c> ofc><00:01:22.720><c>
- :01:55.760><c> mec><00:01:56.000><c> likec><00:01:56.400><c> youc><00:01:56.920><c> wouldc><00
- c><00:02:54.400><c> Canc><00:02:54.640><c> Ic><00:02:54.720><c> havec><00:02:54.960><c> ac>
- ><c> toc><00:04:01.440><c> bec><00:04:01.560><c> madec><00:04:02.080><c> inc><00:04:02.880><c
HI
Transcript Highlights:
- ><c> thatc><00:27:03.559><c> typec><00:27:03.720><c> ofc><00:27:04.159><c> wec> helicopter gear
- :08.280><c> quarantinec><00:47:08.920><c> typec><00:47:09.240><c> workc><00:47:10.240><c> umc
- ><00:47:10.720><c> likec><00:47:11.200><c> umc><00:47:12.200><c> forc> does quarantine type work
- c> toc><00:48:44.839><c> putc><00:48:45.800><c> thisc><00:48:46.079><c> typec><00:48:46.280><
- c><00:49:28.440><c> allc><00:49:28.599><c> thatc><00:49:28.720><c> typec><00:49:28.839><c> of
Summary:
The joint hearing focused on a bill reorganizing Hawaiʻi’s biosecurity and invasive species framework, including moving or renaming responsibilities within the Department of Agriculture and Biosecurity and clarifying the role of the Hawaiʻi Invasive Species Council (HISC). Testimony from the Hawaiian Invasive Species Council, DLNR, Oʻahu and Big Island invasive species committees, the Sierra Club, farmers, and community members generally agreed that invasive species management is critical, but many opposed consolidating HISC or broader biosecurity functions into a single department. Supporters of the existing interagency model emphasized HISC’s statewide coordination role, its links to DLNR and other agencies, and its ability to fill gaps with federal funding and cross-agency collaboration.
Several testifiers raised concerns that the bill could weaken existing authority or create unintended legal and operational problems. The Sierra Club and others warned about possible interstate commerce issues, loss of authority to regulate movement of infested material within an island, and the need to preserve HISC as an independent or elevated coordinating body rather than placing it inside one agency. Community testimony described real-world impacts from little fire ants, coqui frogs, and landscaping-related introductions, and argued that the current system has produced service gaps and duplication when funding or responsibilities shift. One testifier also urged removing hemp movement reporting provisions, saying they do not aid biosecurity and should be treated like other crops.
DLNR and Department of Agriculture representatives said they support the overall goal of stronger biosecurity but stressed that invasive species work is broader than agriculture alone. They noted that DOA, DLNR, and other partners each have different missions and capabilities, and that staff safety, terrain, and training matter when responding in remote areas. The department said it was recruiting for new positions, with some of the 44 funded positions still being finalized, and that implementation would require phased rulemaking, standards, training, and outreach. Members asked about the bill’s practical impact, staffing needs, and whether inspectors are prohibited from hiking; the department said no blanket prohibition exists, but staff use judgment based on safety and terrain. No vote or final action was taken in the portion provided.
NH
New Hampshire 2025 Regular Session
House Finance Division I (03/07/2025)
Transcript Highlights:
- /c><00:31:10.760><c> typesc><00:31:11.120><c> forc> One-Stop shop for those those types for One-Stop
- c><00:43:53.200><c> thec> other types of permits they have but the other types of permits they have
- :40.920><c> andc><00:55:41.480><c> andc> types of consequences as well um and and types of consequences
- ><c> ofc><02:55:50.080><c> thingsc> hazardous waste those types of things hazardous waste those types
- ><c> typec><03:19:08.960><c> ofc> right design um depends on the type of right design um depends
Summary:
The committee heard a presentation from the Department of Environmental Services on proposed changes in House Bill 2 and related technical changes in House Bill 1 tied to the governor’s permitting realignment initiative. The proposal would move environmental review staff from Fish and Game and DNCR to DES to create a more centralized “one-stop shop” for applicants needing DES permits, especially for wildlife and natural heritage reviews. DES said the goal is to speed permitting, support a 60-day review clock, and improve coordination among agencies while keeping the substantive review work in place.
Members asked about staffing impacts, the scope of the transferred duties, and whether the change would create redundancy or weaken the other agencies. DES said most of the affected staff work primarily on these reviews, though Fish and Game staff also handle other state and federal reviews, which is why the proposal was adjusted to keep one of the four Fish and Game positions there and move three to DES, along with two positions from DNCR. DES also described a new supervisory position in HB 2 to manage the transferred staff within its land resources bureau. Officials said the reviews would still be done by specialists, but under DES supervision, and that the agencies would continue to coordinate recommendations on species impacts and mitigation.
The committee also discussed fee increases intended to offset costs, including a 50% increase in wetlands fees and a 100% increase in alteration-of-terrain fees, with the department saying the changes would cover the new positions. Members raised concerns about impacts on private homeowners, possible incentives to work without permits, and whether fines should be used more as a revenue source or for mitigation. DES said wetlands permits are roughly split between homeowner-related and commercial projects, that permit-by-notification already creates a two-tier structure for smaller projects, and that enforcement relies partly on public complaints and online permitting systems. The department also said most fines currently go to the general fund and vary widely year to year, with about $75,000 budgeted, and that the proposal would also create permit-by-notification authority for alteration-of-terrain projects between 100,000 and 150,000 square feet, mirroring language in Senate Bill 110. No vote or final committee action was taken in the portion provided.
KY
Kentucky 2025 Regular Session
Interim Joint Committee on Transportation (8-18-25) - Reupload
Transcript Highlights:
- ><c> wec><00:31:09.279><c> havec><00:31:09.679><c> severalc><00:31:10.080><c> typesc><00:31:10.320
- So, you know, those<01:28:24.719><c> typec><01:28:24.960><c> of,c><01:28:25.360><c> youc><01:28
- ><c> bringc><01:29:36.159><c> thesec><01:29:36.480><c> typec><01:29:36.719><c> ofc> just want
- ><c> thatc><01:37:42.400><c> arec><01:37:42.960><c> originalc> these types of systems that are
- bec><01:42:18.400><c> umc><01:42:19.360><c> thesec><01:42:19.679><c> typesc><01:42:19.920><c
Keywords:
This meeting was recovered from a back up copy and uploaded after the original meeting took place., 958, all
Summary:
The committee received an update from the Kentucky Transportation Cabinet on the FY 2025 road fund. Officials reported road fund revenues came in $38.5 million above the enacted estimate, but were down about $11 million from FY 2024, largely because a motor fuels tax rate reduction took effect at the start of FY 2025. Motor vehicle usage tax receipts were stronger than expected, and the cabinet said the road fund ended the year with a $61.6 million surplus, which the budget bill directs to state highway construction. Members also discussed how the motor fuels decline affects formula distributions to cities, counties, and rural/secondary roads, with officials saying about $122.8 million had been planned for revenue sharing but was not distributed because receipts were lower than forecast.
Members asked about broader revenue trends, including fuel efficiency, electric vehicles, and the removal of a hybrid fee. Cabinet officials said improved fuel efficiency and CAFE standards reduce gasoline consumption and therefore fuel tax receipts, while EVs and plug-in hybrids are subject to a user fee. They also said toll revenues from the Louisville bridges are covering bills and commitments, though they did not have detailed figures at hand. On project delivery, officials said delays are often caused by right-of-way acquisition, utility relocation, and the large volume of projects in the highway plan, and that much of the work happens behind the scenes before construction begins.
The committee also reviewed the cabinet’s cash management approach, which was adopted after 2000 to avoid setting aside full project costs all at once and to keep the road fund cash balance above a required minimum. Officials said the balance typically rises in winter and falls in summer as project bills come due, and that the current balance was about $166 million. They also reported that project awards for the year were nearing $998 million and expected to exceed last year’s total. No formal votes or legislative actions were taken beyond approving the prior meeting minutes.
NH
New Hampshire 2025 Regular Session
House Municipal and County Government (02/19/2025)
Municipal and County Government
Transcript Highlights:
- ><c> typicallyc><01:46:43.040><c> ourc><01:46:43.520><c> typec> application um typically our type
- c><01:47:07.560><c> rulec><01:47:08.080><c> onc><01:47:08.400><c> thosec><01:47:08.639><c> types
- c><01:47:08.880><c> ofc> um really rule on those types of um really rule on those types of applications
- 17.679><c> havec><01:59:17.880><c> somec><01:59:18.119><c> typec><01:59:18.280><c> ofc> involved
- anyc><02:02:52.840><c> otherc><02:02:53.040><c> typec><02:02:53.199><c> ofc> doesn't do that
MN
Minnesota 2025 1st Special Session
House Housing Finance and Policy Committee 3/12/25
Housing Finance and Policy
Transcript Highlights:
- 36.720><c> varietyc><00:26:37.320><c> ofc><00:26:37.520><c> typesc><00:26:37.760><c> ofc> the
- :58.679><c> typec><00:26:58.840><c> ofc><00:26:58.960><c> homesc> town home um again the type of
- c><00:27:04.000><c> differentc><00:27:04.279><c> typesc><00:27:04.520><c> ofc> but because of
- thisc><01:15:54.679><c> typec> to make decisions of this type to make decisions of this type based
- 16.600><c> typec><01:34:16.840><c> locationsc> some nominal strip mall type locations some nominal
WY
Wyoming 2026 Regular Session
House Labor, Health & Social Services Committee, February 27, 2026
Labor, Health & Social Services
Transcript Highlights:
- > typesc><00:20:13.840><c> ofc> uh all the time to those types of uh all the time to those types
- 20:58.000><c> thatc><00:20:58.400><c> thatc><00:20:58.880><c> typec><00:20:59.039><c> ofc><00
- c> types of hospitals. types of hospitals.
- 54:14.400><c> typec><00:54:14.720><c> servicesc> really for more shoppable type services really for
- 26.240><c> typec><00:54:26.480><c> servicesc><00:54:27.520><c> um,c><00:54:27.599><c> thatc><