Transcript Highlights:

• You really want as... initial evaluation and that's that is initial evaluation and that's that is what
• Was this evaluation or examination initially conducted, and what level of review is needed beyond that
• <00:28:39.120> or would be that secondary evaluation or would be that secondary evaluation
• <00:29:32.320> or<00:29:32.480> examination that initial evaluation or examination
• that initial evaluation or examination was<00:29:33.440> not<00:29:33.679> sufficient<00

Bills: SF0023, SF0057

Keywords: mental health, involuntary hospitalization, examiners, public safety, Wyoming legislature, hospital pricing, healthcare transparency, public health, civil penalties, shoppable services, 916, all

Transcript Highlights:

• We both further evaluated those sites, and we requested and received an extension.
• We both further evaluated those sites, and we requested and received an extension.
• So that we can further evaluate sites outside of the no-pass zone, which we did.
• We both further evaluated those sites, and we requested and received an extension.
• by our landfill advisory evaluated by our landfill advisory committee<00:17:29.240> as<00:17:

Keywords: 912, senate, all

Summary: The informational briefing focused on the City and County of Honolulu’s effort to site a replacement landfill for Oahu before Waimanalo Gulch landfill closes in 2028. Department of Environmental Services officials outlined the solid waste system, including curbside collection, convenience centers, transfer stations, H-POWER, and the existing landfill, and explained that H-POWER reduces the volume of waste going to the landfill by about 90%. They reviewed the siting history, including the 2019 Land Use Commission deadline, the 2020 enactment of Act 73 with landfill setback and conservation-district restrictions, and the 2021-2022 landfill advisory committee that evaluated six sites but recommended none because they were within the Board of Water Supply’s no-pass zone. The city said it ultimately selected a site in central Oahu, on agricultural land near Wahiawa and the Dole Plantation, as the best legally permissible option and described it as requiring about 150 acres, with 90 acres for the landfill itself. City officials also described the proposed landfill design and safeguards, emphasizing a modern sanitary landfill with double liners, leachate collection, groundwater monitoring wells, and post-closure monitoring. They said the ash from H-POWER is dry and that leachate would be pumped to a wastewater treatment plant. They stated the site is away from residences and groundwater wells, accessible by highway, and can be permitted under state and federal rules, though they acknowledged that a full environmental review, public hearings, and multiple permits would still be required. When asked whether the new landfill could be operating before the 2028 closure date, the city said it did not yet know and that an extension of Waimanalo Gulch might be needed if the new site is not ready in time. The Board of Water Supply strongly opposed the city’s decision to site a landfill above Oahu’s freshwater resources. Its representative said the agency’s mission is to protect safe, dependable water for the future and that it had disapproved all six previously proposed sites because they were located over freshwater aquifers. In response to questions from legislators, the Board said it could not guarantee the liner system would remain impermeable forever and warned that leachate can contain hazardous chemicals, including so-called forever chemicals. The Board characterized the proposal as a long-term risk to the island’s drinking water supply and compared the decision to past infrastructure choices that later proved problematic. No votes or formal actions were taken during the briefing.

Transcript Highlights:

• utilities to identify critical circuits and provide the information necessary for local entities to evaluate
• some of the existing portals do not provide many of the distribution system details necessary to evaluate
• as we understand them, I think they could go a long way in addressing our concerns, and we'll re-evaluate
• that the state should allow the data center cost study due January 1, 2027, to be completed and evaluated
• now states that if a utility submits their general rate case and then upon their own review and evaluation

Keywords: 987, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• If we were to look back on another way that we try to evaluate things and say, what can we live without
• If we were to look back on another way that we try to evaluate things and say, what can we live without
• But I think that we can at If we were to look back on another way that we try to evaluate things and
• But I think that we can at Evaluate things and say, what can we live without?
• , you know, one, can we achieve evaluate, you know, one, can we achieve the<00:21:24.000> same

Keywords: 958, all

Summary: The committee first heard a presentation from Northern Kentucky building industry representatives Brian Miller and Matt Mains on housing affordability and construction workforce issues. They argued that regulatory and code requirements add significant cost to new homes, citing an estimate of nearly $94,000 per home nationally and $15,000 to $20,000 per home in Boone County over the past decade. They recommended reforms to building code adoption, architectural design mandates, permit fees and delays, and setback/land dedication rules, saying these changes could reduce costs by $25,000 to $35,000 per home without affecting public safety. They also discussed workforce training efforts through the Enzwe Building Institute, dual-credit programs, apprenticeship incentives, and workforce grants, saying these efforts have helped hold wage growth below regional trends and improve housing affordability. Committee members asked about the breakdown of regulatory costs, the effect of energy codes, and ways to speed up permitting. The presenters said the costs were roughly split among federal, state, and local requirements, with local regulations adding about $25,000 to $35,000 and some energy-code changes adding about $19,000 per home. They said faster plan review, coordination with the Kentucky Division of Water, and addressing municipal staffing shortages could cut 30 to 45 days from approvals. Members also discussed the difficulty of building starter homes under about $350,000 and the need for more missing-middle housing, with the presenters saying such homes are hard to produce without sacrificing quality. The committee then took up Representative Kim Moer and Dr. Dale Bertram’s discussion of marriage and family therapist licensing and healthcare workforce data reporting. They explained that the bill would allow Kentucky to recognize out-of-state marriage and family therapists who meet licensure requirements, have no disciplinary history, and have passed the national exam, in order to reduce barriers and address provider shortages, especially in rural areas. They also described a separate workforce data reporting section that would require licensure boards to collect consistent information on where licensees practice and whether they are actively seeing patients, including through telehealth, so the state can better understand its healthcare workforce. Members supported the portability idea, noted that some qualified applicants are currently working in Indiana instead of Kentucky, and asked whether the data collection could be handled administratively; the sponsors said the bill would create consistency across boards. The committee also briefly discussed occupational board updates and the need for stronger communication between legislators and licensing boards, including architecture licensure issues and efforts to recruit more professionals.

Transcript Highlights:

• , and evaluation for special education services.
• , and evaluation for special education services.
• As it relates to the evaluation of the instructors, that lies with the satellite district.
• The district should be evaluating the people on their campus.
• Who's doing, who's managing the evaluation of the satellite campus instructor?

Keywords: 1182, all

Transcript Highlights:

• We're evaluating those institutions, and we're evaluating those decennial reviews to make sure that the
• evaluate their financial stability. evaluate their financial stability.
• We're evaluating those meeting.
• We're evaluating those institutions<00:50:39.839> and<00:50:40.079> we're<00:50:40.319>
• evaluating<00:50:40.800> those institutions and we're evaluating those institutions and

Keywords: 928, house, all

Summary: The committee heard updates from the chancellors of the state university system and the community college system on ongoing restructuring, collaboration, and enrollment trends. The university system said its office move to the NHTI campus is ahead of schedule and should save students about $250,000 a year while creating revenue for the community college system. Both systems described continued work on transfer pathways, direct-admit outreach, shared advising, and broader efforts to shrink footprints, reduce costs, and improve operational efficiency in response to declining enrollment and demographic pressure. A major topic was a possible federal change to Pell Grant eligibility that would require students to enroll in at least 7.5 credits. The chancellors said most community college students are part-time because of work and family responsibilities, and that the change could affect roughly 2,000 current Pell recipients and make it harder for students to afford or sustain enrollment. Members also discussed how the state’s governor’s scholarship statute largely benefits full-time students, suggesting possible future statutory changes. The chancellors explained how credits typically work, noting most courses are three or four credits and that students would likely need to add an entire course to meet the proposed threshold. The committee also discussed the broader higher education landscape, including declining high school cohorts, competition among New England institutions, and the need to right-size capacity. One member raised concerns about the health of regional campuses such as Plymouth and Keene; the chancellors said incoming enrollment is down at UNH and Plymouth and holding at Keene, attributing the trend to demographics rather than one campus drawing students away from another. They emphasized the importance of community colleges, adult learners, and short-term workforce programs as part of the state’s future education mix. Finally, the committee touched on the value of the university system’s research enterprise. The chancellor said about $250 million a year flows into the university system in federal research grants, with about $9.5 million currently under stop-work orders from federal agencies. She said the immediate concern is not DEI-related but federal cuts and possible caps on indirect cost recovery. Members noted that the R1 research designation supports business partnerships, student opportunities, and economic development projects such as West Edge in Durham.

Transcript Highlights:

• And it is to evaluate—it is to invalidate the law. Is that right? Right.
• I think we have some data needs that we would need to evaluate, and I know that it probably would require
• June draft agenda, I just have two items based on that discussion: the preliminary 2025 actuarial evaluation
• I mean, I have no idea how much time the evaluation will take.
• So would you... ...state the agenda is to include three items: preliminary 2025 actuarial evaluation,

Keywords: 904, all

Summary: The Executive Committee approved the April minutes by roll call vote, with members present voting aye and the minutes adopted. Staff then provided an Attorney General update on pension-related litigation, including the newly filed Dawson class action challenging Gross Second Substitute House Bill 2034, the concluded Dolan case, and the Fowler case, where the trial court orally ruled for plaintiffs on interest calculations and potential disgorgement of state gains, with a written ruling still pending. Committee members emphasized the need for ongoing monitoring and regular reporting on the Dawson case because of its potential impact on the committee and retirement systems. An actuarial update followed, noting that June will include the preliminary 2025 valuation results and contribution-rate information, along with commentary on the demographic experience study. Staff said actuarial resources are limited and asked that any additional actuarial agenda items be scheduled for July or later. The committee also discussed the draft interim work plan and agreed to move the OSA annual update to July. A substantial portion of the meeting focused on Plan 1 COLA policy. Retiree representatives urged the committee to keep working on both immediate ad hoc COLA relief and a longer-term ongoing COLA solution. Members discussed a possible budget proviso requiring legislators to consider a COLA each budget cycle, and staff was asked to develop proposals for further discussion. The committee also agreed to add a June briefing on the PERS/PEACERS request involving animal control technicians, and to include an introductory Plan 3 briefing, with possible comparison to Plan 2, on the June agenda. Staff also explained changes to correspondence handling, including removing letters from the public website to better protect privacy while still making records available upon request. The committee approved the revised June agenda and adjourned.

Transcript Highlights:

• authorities who are telling us how important the IRS determination will be before us so we can kind of evaluate
• and I will probably have to do a little bit of a dance, but the study itself does require it to evaluate
• and I will probably have to do a little bit of a dance, but the study itself does require it to evaluate
• But the study itself does require it to evaluate the actuarial impacts, and so that piece will be evaluated

Summary: The Select Committee on Pension Policy Executive Committee approved the June minutes and received a brief update from Assistant Attorney General Jesse Yoder, who had no litigation updates but offered to answer questions. Actuary Michael Harbour then previewed the September full committee meeting, which will include a report on the financial condition of the DRS-administered pension plans and the state actuary’s recommended economic assumptions. He also cautioned that any actuarial pricing done over the summer could change if assumptions are updated, and suggested taking votes on potential legislation later in the interim, possibly in November or December. A discussion followed about the Left 1 benefit improvement and where the funding came from. Harbour said the benefit tied to SSB 5791 (2022) was paid from the Left 1 trust fund, while a separate Left 2 benefit improvement was in SHB 1701, and he agreed to double-check the issue with DRS after members raised conflicting information. Members then discussed the broader Left 1 study, including whether IRS approval is a key barrier and whether options are limited to merger or closure. Several members asked to hear from Ice Miller, which has been advising on the tax issues, and staff said the committee should receive a written response in the next couple of weeks and could have Ice Miller appear in October. The committee reviewed and adjusted its interim work plan. September will include the actuarial presentations, a more detailed Left 1 study update, and a presentation on PERS and TERS Plan 1 COLAs, including a recap of the bill recommended this year and initial considerations for an ad hoc COLA. October is expected to include DRS administrative and performance updates, with November reserved for the State Investment Board update and a final Left 1 study update, and December may include an educational presentation on excess compensation. Members also requested a future briefing on the month-of-death benefit discussion. The September agenda was adopted, correspondence materials were noted, and the meeting adjourned.

Transcript Highlights:

• basically heads. or tails how we see our community members, our students in our community, for evaluating
• I would like to discuss how faculty is being evaluated in light of declining bar passage rates.
• We provided A 22-page self-assessment and an over 200-page self-evaluation questionnaire.
• All of this was reviewed by A 22-page self-assessment and an over 200-page self-evaluation questionnaire
• ranking purposes, credential purposes with AALS as well as ABA and perhaps even a UNM internal evaluation

Bills: SB1, SB3

Keywords: interstate medical licensure compact, physician licensure, medical license reciprocity, expedited licensure, medical practice act, New Mexico medical board, compact commission, physician mobility, telemedicine, license portability, background check, disciplinary action, joint investigation, reproductive health care, gender-affirming care, scope of practice, medical board transparency, multistate compact, licensure renewal, health care workforce

Transcript Highlights:

• The board lacked a quality control process to ensure staff evaluated and appropriately approved only
• We also found that the department has not developed a process to regularly evaluate the appropriateness
• In addition to the performance audit findings, the sunset review also evaluated the department across
• There was one category here to develop a time-bound plan for following up on the independent evaluator
• Recommendations three through five are regarding the event settlement reviews, which are CFO evaluates

Keywords: 1182, all

Transcript Highlights:

• We did an external evaluation of our Gear Up program.
• We did an external evaluation of our Gear Up program.
• <00:24:19.440> the have no way of really evaluating the have no way of really evaluating the
• c> impacts<00:34:41.280> in mean, we evaluate the impacts in mean, we evaluate the impacts
• of being um meaningfully evaluated. of being um meaningfully evaluated.

Bills: SB2901, SB2902, SB2903, SB2904, SB2905, SB2906, SB2907, SB2908, SB2909, SB2910, SB2911, SB2912, SB2913, SB2914, SB2915, SB2916, SB2917, SB2918, SB2919, SB2920, SB2921, SB2922, SB2923, SB2924, SB2925, SB2926, SB2927, SB2928, SB2929, SB2930, SB2931, SB2932, SB2933, SB2934, SB2935, SB2936, SB2937, SB2938, SB2939, SB2940, SB2941, SB2942, SB2943, SB2944, SB2945, SB2946, SB2947, SB2948, SB2949, SB2950, SB2951, SB2952, SB2953, SB2954, SB2955, SB2956, SB2957, SB2958, SB2959, SB2960, SB2961, SB2962, SB2963, SB2964, SB2965, SB2966, SB2967, SB2968, SB2969, SB2970, SB2971, SB2972, SB2973, SB2974, SB2975, SB2976, SB2977, SB2978, SB2979, SB2980, SB2981, SB2982, SB2983, SB2984, SB2985, SB2986, SB2987, SB2988, SB2989, SB2990, SB2991, SB2992, SB2993, SB2994, SB2995, SB2996, SB2997, SB2998, SB2999, SB3000

Keywords: geological subsurface characterization, groundwater, geothermal resources, environmental review, Hawaii groundwater and geothermal resources center, scientific research, non-extractive, public trust doctrine, clean energy, greenhouse gas, carbon sequestration, climate change, energy policy, Hawaii state energy office, emissions reduction, sustainable development, fare-free transportation, greenhouse gas emissions, public transit, tax on petroleum

Transcript Highlights:

• The other thing I would ask about is evaluations of these centers.
• The other thing I would ask about is evaluations of these centers.
• The other thing I would ask about is evaluations of these centers.
• We do have evaluations between those.
• and we're trying to constantly evaluate and we're trying to constantly evaluate to<01:07:29.039>

Keywords: 958, all

Summary: The committee met for its sixth and final interim meeting after a brief technical delay, approved the October 14 minutes, and heard a presentation on a proposed Kentucky hands-free driving bill. The main discussion centered on distracted driving and a draft measure modeled on South Carolina law that would prohibit holding or supporting a mobile electronic device while driving on public roads, while allowing limited exceptions for parked/stopped vehicles, navigation, emergency reporting, dispatch systems, first responders, and certain hands-free call functions. The bill would make a violation a $100 fine plus court costs, with the draft allocating fine revenue to the traumatic brain injury trust fund, Kentucky trauma care system, and veteran program trust fund. The sponsor also said the bill would address prior concerns about enforcement and clarify that officers need a clear, unobstructed visual observation before stopping a driver, and that they may not search or seize devices or make custodial arrests solely for the violation. Alyssa Burns gave emotional testimony in support of the bill, describing the death of her young daughter Kimberly in a crash she attributed to a distracted driver and urging lawmakers to pass the measure to improve roadway safety. The sponsor cited Kentucky traffic fatality statistics, including 814 deaths in 2023 and an estimated 20% involving distracted driving, and argued that the bill could reduce preventable deaths. Several members voiced support and sympathy, including remarks comparing the effort to past seat belt legislation and suggesting possible future additions such as community service. One member raised concerns about enforcement and whether officers could reliably observe phone use inside vehicles, while another asked about the bill’s interaction with existing texting-while-driving penalties and whether points would still apply. The sponsor said the draft was still being refined, acknowledged gray areas, and invited further changes as the bill moves forward.

Transcript Highlights:

• <00:10:06.760> and management system and then evaluate and management system and then evaluate
• We did further evaluate those sites, and we requested and received an extension. they suggested that
• 2022 um so that we can further evaluate 2022 um so that we can further evaluate sites<00:11:20.959
• which we did we both further evaluated which we did we both further evaluated those<00:11:25.200
• by our landfill advisory evaluated by our landfill advisory committee<00:14:39.360> as<00:14:

Keywords: 910, house, all

Summary: The informational briefing focused on the City and County of Honolulu’s effort to site a replacement landfill for Oahu before the Waimanalo Gulch landfill closes in 2028. Chair Nicole Lowen and other legislators opened the meeting by framing the issue as important statewide and encouraging recycling, composting, and proper use of the curbside bins. The city’s Department of Environmental Services, led by Director Roger Babcock and Deputy Director Mike O’Keefe, then presented the background and siting process. ENV explained the legal and technical constraints that shaped the search, including the 2019 Land Use Commission decision requiring closure of Waimanalo Gulch by March 2, 2028, and the 2020 Act 73 restrictions on landfill siting near residences, schools, hospitals, conservation districts, airports, and tsunami inundation areas. They said a landfill advisory committee reviewed six candidate sites in 2021-2022 and rejected them because they fell within the Board of Water Supply’s no-pass zone. After further evaluation and an extension of the naming deadline, the city selected a site in central Oahu near Wahiawa, on agricultural land currently used as a Dole pineapple field. City officials said the selected site was chosen as the best of the evaluated options and, in their view, could be permitted under state and federal law. They described planned environmental protections, including a modern sanitary landfill design with double liners, leachate collection systems, monitoring wells, and post-closure monitoring, and said the existing Waimanalo Gulch landfill has operated for 35 years without leachate leaks. They also emphasized that the site would still require a special use permit, Department of Health approvals, an environmental impact statement, and other public permitting processes, and that public engagement would continue over the next several years.

Transcript Highlights:

• say that I'm very happy to see compensatory aid funding in this bill as long as a work group to evaluate
• say that I'm very happy to see compensatory aid funding in this bill as long as a work group to evaluate
• Section 16 requires the department to post on its website the rubric used to evaluate curriculum.
• rubric used to evaluate curriculum. rubric used to evaluate curriculum.
• <01:38:08.560> the statutory criteria for evaluating the statutory criteria for evaluating

Keywords: 1187, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• Uh, Madam Chair, this has to do with the timing of reports, the program evaluation from the director
• Uh, Madam Chair, this has to do with the timing of reports, the program evaluation from the director
• Uh, Madam Chair, this has to do with the timing of reports, the program evaluation from the director
• Uh, Madam Chair, this has to do with the timing of reports, the program evaluation from the director
• this would work and they would evaluate this would work and they would evaluate that<01:16:10.400

Keywords: 1187, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• And so they need to be the metric that we evaluate our schools upon.
• Let's reimagine how we evaluate our schools.
• school, and I'm here to be excited and to learn," and not just as a statistic and a number to be evaluated
• In fact, I think we could guarantee a better bill written by these students to evaluate their performance

Keywords: House Bill 8, standardized testing, student testimony, education policy, mental health, parent concerns, Texas Education Agency

Summary: The committee meeting focused on the impacts of House Bill 8, which proposes increasing the frequency of state testing for students in Texas. During the meeting, various testimonies were provided by students, highlighting their concerns about the negative effects of standardized testing on their educational experience. Students expressed that the pressure of multiple assessments causes significant stress and detracts from the joy of learning. Some lawmakers voiced their opposition to the bill, emphasizing the need for a thorough review and consideration of alternative evaluation methods that prioritize student well-being over testing metrics.

Transcript Highlights:

• And so they need to be the metrics that we evaluate our schools upon.
• Let's reimagine how we evaluate our schools.
• this school, and I'm here to be excited and to learn and not just as a statistic and a number to be evaluated
• In fact, I think we could guarantee a better bill written by these students to evaluate their performance

Transcript Highlights:

• million per year to a higher number of $67 million per year for the additional special education evaluation
• We talked about how HB 2 doesn't just allow through policy for additional evaluations, but it funds those
• evaluations.
• To accommodate the goals within the bill, evaluation incentives for this biennium.

Keywords: 1185, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• And then, you know, after COVID, everybody wanted to re-evaluate their lives and try new jobs.
• And like I said, not 2008 numbers because we re-evaluated and we got what we thought we needed.
• And I encourage other agencies to look and evaluate that.
• That's where all the other state audit agencies come in and look at how we do our audits and then evaluate

Keywords: 924, joint, all

Transcript Highlights:

• And as a matter of fact, they haven't been evaluated for it.
• I wanted to read the warning, or the statement. 13.1, spike vaccine has not been evaluated for carcinogenic
• TOXIC  OR THAT THEY'RE NOT CARCINOGENIC 462 AND AS A MATTER OF FACT THEY  HAVEN'T BEEN EVALUATED
• Have not been evaluated for carcinogenic or mutagenic potential or impairment of fertility.
• THAT CAUSES CANCER 481 BECAUSE IT'S A PROBLEM. 482 THIS IS MMR TWO VACCINES 483 HAVE NOT  BEEN EVALUATED

Summary: The Budget Committee met with a quorum present and heard several bills, with HB 1483 temporarily postponed. The most contentious measure was HB 945, which would create a state counterintelligence/counterterrorism team within FDLE. The sponsor said it was aimed at terrorists, nation-state actors, and other criminal threats, not political speech, and noted an amendment would address First Amendment concerns later. Opponents from the First Amendment Foundation, ACLU Florida, and other groups argued the bill was too vague, lacked guardrails, and could enable surveillance of protected speech or political activity. Members also raised questions about fiscal impact, oversight, warrants, and the bill’s July start date. Despite those concerns, the committee reported HB 945 favorably by roll call vote. The committee then unanimously passed HB 6507, a claims bill appropriating funds to compensate for damages caused by departmental negligence. HB 813, which clarifies Florida’s firefighter cancer law and death-benefit provisions, also passed after an amendment narrowed the bill and added language allowing a firefighter’s family to receive the death benefit if the firefighter separates from employment and dies within one year. Firefighter representatives supported the bill as a compassionate fix, while one local firefighter representative opposed the amendment, saying it would remove protections and create an arbitrary cutoff. Sponsors responded that DROP would not be affected and that the change was intended to help terminally ill firefighters spend their final days at home without losing survivor benefits. Finally, HB 365, dealing with law enforcement interactions with individuals with autism, passed favorably. Supporters, including family members and autism advocates, said in-person training and positive interactions are crucial to preventing escalations and tragedies during police encounters. They described real-life incidents where lack of training led to harmful outcomes and urged adoption of the bill’s training provisions. Members from both parties voiced support, calling the measure overdue and important for both public safety and the autism community. The chair closed the meeting by noting it was likely the committee’s last budget meeting and adjourned without objection.