Transcript Highlights:

• It has pre-scripted, pre-programmed exports that are already in the program that users can automatically
• program it.
• And then programs like the PRC, we had to automate to the extent possible.
• So it's a brand new program.
• But again, those become programming discussions and how it looks.

Summary: The subcommittee of the Tax Reform and Relief Committee met to begin its study of the feasibility and desirability of revising the content of the real estate tax statement to improve property tax transparency. Legislative Council staff reviewed the study directive under House Bill 1176 and the statutory requirements for tax statements, including required line items such as true and full value, mill levy, legislative tax relief, primary residence credit, and the Legacy Fund portion of that credit. The Tax Department then explained how the current uniform statement is prescribed and approved, and noted that changes are typically driven by statute and implemented collaboratively with counties and vendors. County officials from the North Dakota Association of Counties described the full annual tax cycle, from county budgeting and valuation notices to budget hearing notices, levy certification, cap calculations, and final tax statement mailing. They emphasized that counties and auditors do extensive coordination with taxing districts and neighboring counties, and that the process is labor-intensive and often manual. Members discussed the limited public response to budget notices and tax statements, the difficulty of explaining the legislative tax relief line, the 3% cap and valuation issues, and whether more frequent assessments or different timing would improve understanding. Several members and witnesses noted that many taxpayers only engage when they receive their final bill, and that clarity may be more important than adding more detail. NDACO also presented a rough cost survey from eight counties, estimating an average tax statement cost of about 74 cents and a statewide total near $600,000 for printing and mailing tax statements alone, with outsourcing generally cheaper than in-house printing. Witnesses noted that House Bill 1176 added other mailings and notices, increasing county workload and cost beyond the statement itself. The committee then heard from software vendors, who explained how their systems handle tax billing, budget notices, valuation notices, primary residence credit processing, and tax levy calculations, and they identified the 1600/1685 primary residence credit and discount interaction as a current programming challenge. No votes were taken; the meeting was informational and focused on gathering testimony and identifying issues for possible future recommendations or bill drafts.

Transcript Highlights:

• It would simply say that we do the GIS program—geographic information systems program—does go off of
• information systems program geographic information systems program uh<00:30:59.240> does<00:30
• Bilingual workforce development programs and outreach support small Latino businesses’ efforts to develop
• <00:52:42.720> um launching a policy advocacy program um launching a policy advocacy program
• work and reserve some funds per program work and reserve some funds per program and<01:03:11.920

Keywords: 1187, senate, all

Summary: The committee heard Senate File 59, authored by Senator Green, which would require counties to locate and restore original public land survey monuments and related boundary markers. Green argued that newer GIS/GPS-based surveys have sometimes shifted long-established property lines, creating disputes for landowners, counties, and state agencies. He described examples involving his own property and constituents, including a case where a neighbor allegedly lost access to a well and septic system after a new survey and another where a landowner was told he was farming school trust land based on a newer plat reference. Testimony in support came from Allan Roger Olen, who said a newer survey changed his family’s property lines and created a dispute over land, a building permit, and ownership of well and septic systems. Senator Green also said county plat books are not legally binding and that the bill is intended to force counties to find original monuments before more disputes arise. Committee members raised concerns from the Association of Minnesota Counties about the bill’s timeline, funding, and requirement that counties employ a land surveyor. Green responded that counties had already been told to hire surveyors in some disputes, acknowledged the funding concerns, and said he would look for funding sources while emphasizing protection of property rights. A committee member who teaches surveying explained that adverse possession is a real legal doctrine in Minnesota and noted that restoring all monuments would cost far more than the $10 million already appropriated, estimating the total need at about $300 million. Phil Reigns of the Minnesota Society of Professional Surveyors testified that the Public Land Survey System underlies Minnesota’s land tenure system, that the original monuments were set mostly between 1850 and 1908, and that surveyors aim to restore them as accurately as possible using historical records and modern tools. He said the work is expensive because many counties lack staff surveyors and must hire consultants. Members discussed whether the bill would create boundary conflicts or authorize counties to alter lines, and Green said his intent was to restore original monuments and avoid litigation. Co-Chair Lang moved that Senate File 59, as amended, be recommended to pass and re-referred to the Committee on Judiciary. The motion prevailed on a voice vote. Afterward, the committee began receiving an overview from the Minnesota Council on Latino Affairs.

Transcript Highlights:

• So my ask today is to start implementing programs like Palante into schools as a restorative approach
• and its grant program for districts opting out.
• and its grant program for districts opting out.
• I'm the program support coordinator at the Massachusetts Law Reform Institute.
• My name is Julia Morales, and I'm here today representing the Youth Community Organizing Program from

Keywords: 995, all

Summary: The committee opened a public hearing on 41 bills related to school climate and safety, with chairs Jason Lewis and Ken Gordon outlining procedures and noting more than 125 witnesses. The first major topic was the “Study Act” on cell phones in schools and related social media restrictions (House 666/Senate 335). Secretary of Education Pat Tutwiler and Attorney General Andrea Campbell testified in strong support, arguing that bell-to-bell phone-free policies would improve student focus, reduce anxiety and distraction, and support mental health. Several legislators also supported the approach, though Representative Jeff Turco and Senator John Keenan emphasized narrower bills focused only on school-day phone restrictions rather than broader social media regulation. Senator John Velis likewise backed a comprehensive school-hours restriction, citing student distraction and mental health concerns. Representative Tarsky described successful implementation of a Yondr pouch system in a school where he served as principal, saying it improved engagement and reduced bullying and discipline issues. The committee then heard testimony on a bill to prohibit Native American mascots in public schools (Senate 312/House 575). Senator Joe Comerford, Brittany Wally, and Rhonda Anderson all urged passage, saying Native mascots are dehumanizing, harmful to Native youth, and inconsistent with civil rights and educational values. They described support from tribal nations and noted that many Massachusetts schools have already changed mascots, but some still resist. The hearing also included testimony on school start times (House 647/Senate 360), where middle school students Caroline Duffy and Emery Jarvis described exhaustion and survey data showing widespread sleep deprivation. Former educator Telia Jacobs, former principal Rep. Tarsky, and others argued that later start times would improve health, learning, and student well-being, while acknowledging transportation and scheduling challenges. Zoriana Petrosian, who helped write one of the bills as a student, said the state already has enough research to act now. Additional bills drew testimony on related school issues. Dr. Raul Fernandez supported a bill promoting racially integrated schools (Senate 324), citing a recent advisory council report showing large disparities in segregated schools and urging DESE to develop a statewide integration strategy. On safe firearm storage education (House 548/Senate 397), multiple witnesses from Grassroots for Gun Violence Prevention and school communities supported annual school-based education about secure storage, saying it would help prevent child access to unsecured firearms and build on local resolutions already adopted in some districts. The committee also heard testimony on bills to expand career and academic plans (House 533/Senate 438), with speakers saying more structured planning would help students make informed college and career choices. Later, testimony on child sexual abuse prevention and survivor support bills described the prevalence of abuse, the need for training in schools and youth-serving organizations, and the importance of extending compensation and prevention measures. Throughout the hearing, chairs repeatedly closed bills with no witnesses and moved the agenda forward, but no votes were taken in the portion of the transcript provided.

Transcript Highlights:

• a year-round deed restriction pilot program.
• an emergency rental assistance program after the pandemic, and protecting these programs requires policies
• an emergency rental assistance program after the pandemic, and protecting these programs requires policies
• She's one of our young people within the program. Perfect.
• She's one of our young people within the program. Perfect.

Keywords: 995, all

Summary: The Joint Committee on Municipalities and Regional Government held a long public hearing focused mainly on two sets of issues: proposals to amend or repeal the MBTA Communities Act, and bills to allow local rent stabilization. Committee chairs opened by explaining the hearing would be tightly managed because of the very large number of speakers, with testimony limited to two minutes per person and written testimony still accepted by email. Members and witnesses were called in a mix of in-person and virtual order throughout the hearing. On the MBTA Communities Act, several legislators and local officials argued the law is too rigid and should be revised to account for local conditions. Speakers from small, rural, or infrastructure-limited communities such as Hanson, Halifax, Marshfield, Winthrop, Dracut, Carver, Rehoboth, and others said the law’s one-size-fits-all approach does not fit towns with limited water, sewer, transit access, or buildable land. Some filed bills would repeal the law, exempt certain communities, or create appeals processes based on infrastructure, environmental, or historical constraints. Supporters of the law’s changes emphasized local control and the need to avoid forcing development where communities believe it is impractical or inconsistent with town character. A large portion of the hearing was devoted to rent stabilization legislation, especially S. 1447 and related House bills. Supporters included legislators, city councilors, tenant advocates, labor leaders, housing nonprofits, public health organizations, and residents who described sharp rent increases, displacement, homelessness risk, and the strain on working families, seniors, students, and people with disabilities. They argued local-option rent stabilization would let municipalities cap excessive increases and prevent no-fault evictions while preserving flexibility for local conditions. Opponents, including small landlords and property owners, said rent control would discourage investment, worsen housing quality, burden responsible owners, and drive small landlords out of the market. Some witnesses also supported a Cape Cod/Island transfer fee bill and a suburban infrastructure fund, arguing those would provide local revenue for housing or roads. No votes or formal committee actions were taken during the hearing.

Transcript Highlights:

• He's a hardworking, popular student at the college's ESL and ACE programs.
• ESL and ACE programs. He is a survivor of gun violence.
• the 2024-2025 program year, Higher Education Department...
• training program, nearly 800 learners... ...participated in integrated education and training programs
• And the only places that would be looked at for this emissions program are stationary sources.

Keywords: 996, all

Transcript Highlights:

• We have the increase of demand for ERPOs and program administration.
• We have the increase of public education and outreach campaigns.
• > the<00:58:46.799> military, In the military, if we think that our access to special programs
• was about those SMART meetings, uh, providing performance-based and how they were succeeding in programs
• <01:32:07.040> is look at whether that program is look at whether that program is successful

Keywords: 981, all

Transcript Highlights:

• I’ll find some program that’s going to help you find a car.”
• I’ll find some program that’s going to help you find a car.”
• <02:04:17.800> a America is the scenic byways program a America is the scenic byways program
• > country<02:04:20.599> and beloved program across the country and beloved program across
• money for our Bridge replacement program money for our Bridge replacement program so<02:10:14.119

Keywords: 1187, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• Dispensaries have been added along with more qualifications to get into the program, and the program
• has into the program, and the program has into the program, and the program has been<00:44:27.920
• medical program for very sick patients. medical program for very sick patients.
• And then they have a loose one laying... the federal program that receive 300 the federal program that
• at potentially expanding the program at potentially expanding the program again<01:22:37.040>

Keywords: 1191, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• <01:16:00.480> to up with a decal plate uh program to up with a decal plate uh program to
• in our safety programs. in our safety programs.
• the transportation alternatives program. the transportation alternatives program.
• ><02:04:53.280> program, is the federal program, is the federal program, um<02:04:55.280> it
• So that is programmed for 2027.

Keywords: 1191, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• We have peer-to-peer mental health and substance use programs, and there are programs across the country
• We have peer-to-peer mental health and substance use programs, and there are programs across the country
• access the program.
• <02:36:29.479> and federal 340b drug pricing program and federal 340b drug pricing program
• The program is a federal program, which would really need a federal fix, and we support a program that

Keywords: 1191, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• communication access Services Program communication access Services Program for<00:31:42.080>
• Thank you. program into the office of Health Equity program into the office of Health Equity and<00:35
• general funds for different programs general funds for different programs that<00:45:10.240>
• But in any program where there is an individual who works on a project or a program that has federal
• <02:47:13.880> voluntary program so these programs are voluntary program so these programs

Keywords: 1189, house, all

Transcript Highlights:

• ,<01:44:01.679> housing invest New Hampshire program, housing invest New Hampshire program
• We have a Lake Coast program.
• > all<04:51:50.000> that,<04:51:50.240> the program.
• Having said all that, the program.
• <05:00:37.280> in they they have some great programs in they they have some great programs

Keywords: 928, house, all

Summary: The committee heard public testimony on HB 1065, a housing bill that would clarify when multifamily and mixed-use housing may be allowed on commercially zoned land, define infrastructure standards, and preserve municipal discretion over where such development can occur. Prime sponsor Representative David Priest said the bill is intended to help address the housing shortage by using already developed commercial areas without overriding local planning. The New Hampshire Municipal Association, through Brody Dees, said it supports the bill and views it as a priority, but noted it is still discussing related language with stakeholders and wants clearer definitions for multifamily development, infrastructure, and adaptive reuse while preserving local control over commercial land use. Testimony was mixed. Ivy Van, a certified planner, opposed the bill because she said the infrastructure language is too restrictive and could exclude properties served by private utilities or septic systems. Chris Freeman, a housing provider, was generally supportive but recommended technical changes, arguing the infrastructure definition may be too broad and that the adaptive reuse language could unintentionally block useful building modifications. He said the bill should be clarified so it does not discourage reuse projects. The committee then moved to discussion of an accessory dwelling unit bill, with Representative Turkot describing changes that would shift some ADU approvals from a matter of right to conditional use or special exception, allow municipalities more control over attached versus detached units, set parking standards tied to single-family dwellings, and adjust size limits. He argued the bill would restore local discretion and prevent ADUs from becoming primarily rental units. Representative Reed pushed back, saying detached ADUs can help meet housing needs and provide opportunities for small landlords, while other members questioned how the bill would affect existing detached structures and breezeways. No votes were taken in the excerpt, and the chair also noted a recess and time limits for later testimony.

Transcript Highlights:

• Um, when we've looked into these projects, uh, so LIHTC, um, they're tax credit funded programs,
• We have a Lake Coast program.
• > all<04:51:50.000> that,<04:51:50.240> the program.
• Having said all that, the program.
• <05:00:37.280> in they they have some great programs in they they have some great programs

Keywords: 1189, house, all

Transcript Highlights:

• <01:53:18.760> to Development of uh training programs to Development of uh training programs
• programs to inform and educate the public, particularly regarding safety.
• oversight of nuclear incentive programs oversight of nuclear incentive programs such<04:09:47.439
• c> and well as Outreach programs to inform and well as Outreach programs to inform and educate<04
• <05:16:35.920> or effects of the programs or effects of the programs or experimentations<05

Keywords: 1189, house, all

Transcript Highlights:

• It was evident that ChatGPT was programmed to keep its users engaged and it engaged with Adam on every
• There was no siren, no call to emergency services, and no outreach to us as his parents.
• He was crying out for help to a machine that was programmed to be helpful, but was utterly incapable
• with this program.
• with this program.

Keywords: 987, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• Thank you. side of the Medicaid program. On behalf side of the Medicaid program.
• to the fact that this program exists. to the fact that this program exists.
• this program to $1.25 million annually. this program to $1.25 million annually.
• <00:26:20.799> Thank support of the program. Thank support of the program.
• screening programs, Kentucky improved. screening programs, Kentucky improved.

Keywords: 958, all

Summary: The meeting opened with roll call, approval of the September 17 minutes, and an introduction of Sarah Rome to the committee. The chair also noted that the committee would stay on schedule and then moved to presentations. Representative Amy Neighbors and Taylor Williams of the Kentucky Pharmacists Association presented a refiled “pharmacy parity” proposal, formerly House Bill 3, to require Medicaid reimbursement for pharmacist clinical services already authorized under current scope of practice. They said the bill would not expand Medicaid or pharmacist scope, but would align Medicaid with commercial insurance, improve access and outcomes, and likely save money; they cited a Cabinet report under Senate Joint Resolution 26, which found similar laws in other states were producing savings or trending toward savings and would require only modest administrative updates. No member questions were raised after that presentation. The committee then heard an update on the Kentucky Colon Cancer Screening Program from Senator Stephen Meredith, Dr. Whitney Jones, Melissa Carrier, and Representative Neighbors. They described the program’s goals of increasing screening, reducing deaths through earlier detection, and preventing cancers by finding polyps, saying it has produced substantial savings and improved outcomes. Speakers emphasized Kentucky’s high colorectal cancer burden, especially in younger adults, and said the program helps uninsured and underinsured Kentuckians access stool-based screening and follow-up colonoscopies through a network of partners including the Department for Public Health, Kentucky Cancer Link, and university cancer programs. They requested an increase in funding from $500,000 to $1.25 million annually, or $2.5 million over the biennium, to expand services, fill geographic gaps, and support education and navigation. Members asked whether the colon cancer screening was already covered by Medicaid, and the presenters replied that Medicaid does cover it, but the program serves people who are not on Medicaid or who fall into a separate eligibility category based on income and insurance status. A member also clarified the requested funding increase. The committee then moved on to the next agenda item, an update from the Children’s Home of Northern Kentucky, where board member Sal Santoro and CHNK Behavioral Health leaders began a presentation describing the organization’s broader behavioral health work and its request, but the transcript cuts off before that presentation concludes or any action is taken.

Transcript Highlights:

• The child support program is one of the largest income support and anti-poverty programs for families
• support and anti high-poverty programs support and anti high-poverty programs for<00:24:00.200><
• <00:34:01.600> and<00:34:02.080> they program it's a federal program and they program
• are federal programs.
• are federal programs those programs are federal programs there<04:39:52.040> are<04:39:52.360

Keywords: 928, house, all

Summary: The meeting began with committee process reminders from the chair, including rules for questioning witnesses, time limits for testimony, and how motions and committee reports are handled. The chair also discussed the committee’s history, emphasized a cooperative approach with agencies and the Judiciary, and noted that a special committee on the Family Division of Circuit Court had previously done useful work; he said a new subcommittee could be appointed later to continue looking at judicial-system issues. He also mentioned that the Speaker’s office was expected to name members to the DHHS oversight committee by Friday at 1. The substantive presentation was from the Department of Health and Human Services’ Bureau of Child Support Services. Attorney John Williams introduced the bureau team, and Bureau Chief Lisa Dekowski described the program’s mission: encouraging responsible parenting, family self-sufficiency, and child well-being by locating parents, establishing paternity, setting or modifying support orders, and enforcing court-ordered child and medical support. She said the bureau operates statewide under Title IV-D of the Social Security Act, works with courts, employers, and other partners, and serves both in-state and out-of-state cases, with some international and tribal coordination. She also cited program scale, saying the bureau dispersed about $76 million to families in New Hampshire in fiscal year 2023 and that most collections go directly to families. Members asked about enforcement tools, especially passport denial. In response to a question about a case involving a very small shortfall, the bureau said the federal passport-denial threshold is $2,500 in arrears, not a few cents, and that denial remains in place until the balance is resolved or an arrangement is made with the agency, with hardship factors potentially considered. The bureau also explained that either parent can apply for services when a child support order exists and that the bureau can help initiate income withholding orders. No votes or formal actions were taken during this portion of the meeting.

Transcript Highlights:

• room for this program?
• And that's how I view this program. And that's how I view this program.
• It's a voluntary program.
• Hampshire's employee assistance program. Hampshire's employee assistance program.
• it an insurance program of some sort? it an insurance program of some sort?

Keywords: 1189, house, all

Transcript Highlights:

• And I do vehicle under this program.
• In Campbell County, we um programming.
• ><02:48:01.359> and supporting programs, facilities, and supporting programs, facilities, and
• We're talking about swim lessons, youth and adult sport programs, after-school and summer camp programs
• , afterchool and summer camp programs, afterchool and summer camp programs,<02:49:06.800> community

Bills: HB0068, HB0062, HB0127, HB0109

Keywords: veterans, property tax exemption, disabled, service-connected disability, Wyoming, governmental claims, liability limits, inflation adjustment, public safety, local government insurance, HB0127, recreation mill levy, recreational facilities, public recreation, mill levy, property tax, local tax, county commissioners, school district levy, voter approval

Transcript Highlights:

• We are looking to add a staff member, both in our security program and facilities program.
• These are pilot programs.
• We hired a Chair, we hired a Program Manager. In fact, we hired two Program Managers.
• That's a psychoeducational program. Individuals aged 14 to 21 qualify to enter that program.
• , all three counties program.