Transcript Highlights:

• status under Section 23071(d) of the California Revenue and Taxation Code or federal tax-exempt status
• federal Internal Revenue Code.
• exempt status under Section 23071D, the California Revenue Text Code, or federal tax exempt status under
• Code are eligible for public funding.
• internal revenue code.

Summary: The committee heard a series of child care, social services, immigrant support, disability services, and language access bills, with many measures drawing strong support and no opposition. Early in the hearing, AB 450 proposed a Department of Aging task force to study and recommend policies for undocumented adults age 55 and older; AB 593 would let CDSS identify data-sharing opportunities to improve CalFresh administration and participation; and AB 904 would clarify child care subsidy eligibility so families do not lose care during pregnancy leave, family leave, caregiving, or job search periods. All three were presented as ways to reduce barriers and improve access to essential services, and AB 904 was moved out on a 1-0 call after support testimony from child care advocates and a member of the public. AB 617, which would expand and standardize respite care access for people with intellectual and developmental disabilities by requiring licensing and registry participation, drew both support and significant opposition from respite providers and disability service organizations concerned about added regulation, cost, and possible delays; the author said she would continue working with opponents, and the bill was moved out on a 2-0 call. The committee also heard AB 1220, which would require regional centers to document denials, notices of action, and appeals in individual program plans and include that data in annual reports to improve transparency and equity in developmental services. The bill drew extensive public support from parents, advocates, and disability organizations, with no opposition, and passed 5-0. AB 752 would make child care centers by right in certain residential zones when co-located with multifamily housing or institutional uses, and supporters argued it would reduce zoning barriers and help expand child care capacity; it also passed 5-0. AB 1242 would create a CalHHS language access director, require human review of machine translation, and improve language coverage determinations for state and local agencies; supporters emphasized health equity and the need for better access for limited-English communities, and the bill was moved out on a 4-0 call. Later, AB 548 would continue and expand the Asylee and Vulnerable Non-Citizen Program, which provides case management and integration services for asylees and certain visa holders; supporters said the program had been effective but had run out of funding, and the bill passed 4-0. AB 495, the Family Preparedness Plan Act, would strengthen family safety planning for immigrant families, standardize acceptance of caregiver authorization affidavits, and create a joint guardianship process for temporary separations; testimony focused on fear of family separation and the need for clear school and medical procedures, and the bill passed 4-0. AB 1357 would exclude guaranteed income payments from being counted as income for state public assistance eligibility, with supporters arguing it would prevent recipients from falling off the “benefits cliff”; it passed 4-1. Finally, AB 1201, the Reunity Act, was introduced to require individualized court assessments before denying reunification services to parents with certain violent felony convictions after a five-year period, with the author and a witness describing the bill as a trauma-informed approach to family reunification.

Transcript Highlights:

• They are the federal tax and a state tax.
• When employers are complying with paying state taxes, they get a discount on their federal taxes.
• up front, When an employer is subject to an unemployment tax, their specific tax rate is determined
• So the tax rate that Virginia businesses pay for this federal tax is 0.6%, which is, on an annual basis
• The fund is primarily financed through the tax scheme that I explained a few slides ago, and those taxes

Summary: The Commission on Unemployment Compensation met, established a quorum, and elected Delegate Destiny LeVere Bolling as chair and Senator Mike Jones as vice chair. The commission also adopted its electronic meeting policy and heard introductions from new members, staff, and officials from the Secretary of Labor’s office and the Virginia Employment Commission (VEC). Secretary Jessica Lumen outlined the administration’s workforce and labor priorities, including supporting workers, employers, and program transparency, while members raised concerns about business climate, job losses, labor participation, and the implementation of paid family and medical leave. Staff provided legislative updates on recent unemployment-related bills. These included increases to the weekly unemployment benefit amount enacted in 2025 and 2026, a bill on labor dispute disqualification that changed how lockouts are treated for benefit eligibility, and a budget item providing $75,000 for actuarial support to the commission. The commission also discussed the 2025 work group on annual adjustments to weekly benefit amounts; staff reported that the work group did not complete its charge, and members agreed to revisit whether to reconstitute it at a future meeting. Delegate Martinez expressed support for continuing the work, and the chair said the issue would be taken up at the next meeting. Deputy Commissioner Joanna Darkus gave a detailed presentation on Virginia’s unemployment insurance system, including current claims data, eligibility rules, employer tax structure, benefit levels, trust fund solvency, fraud prevention, and customer service operations. She reported that Virginia’s unemployment rate remains low, weekly claims are modest, the current weekly benefit range is $160 to $478, and the trust fund balance factor is projected at 50.9 percent, near the threshold for additional employer charges. Members asked about the taxable wage base, trust fund solvency, the effect of benefit increases, fraud controls, and the planned paid family and medical leave program. VEC said it is implementing that program through regulations, staffing, IT procurement, public listening sessions, and consultation with other states. A public commenter from the Virginia Poverty Law Center urged the commission to strengthen state investment in unemployment insurance and warned that federal support is uncertain. The commission then adjourned without taking further action.

Transcript Highlights:

• There's a QR code. It is prescriptive.
• It's if you want to scan a QR code, if the consumer goes the next step to actually scan the QR code.
• That QR code has to be linked to someplace. Where is your QR code linked to? To their website.
• So if there's a QR code that's reference to, thank you for that.
• So then let me ask you, this QR code, Assembly Member Rodriguez, this QR code that's going to link to

Keywords: 987, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• tax revenue also has...
• Since we only receive extraction tax revenue in North Dakota, extraction tax revenue also has stripper
• Another area: administrative code. Our new administrative code updates will go live April 1.
• So on the property tax, last year we generated about $8.8 million in property taxes.
• But not all of the counties that are taxed with property tax have a benefit from this project.

Keywords: 908, all

Transcript Highlights:

• THAT I CAN RESCIND AT ANY GIVEN TIME WITH NOTICE BUT MAKE THEM AVAILABLE TO ME, SHOW UP WITH A QR CODE
• PCB IS ONE OF THE FEW CITIES WITHOUT AN AD VALOREM TAX. RCRA KEEPS TAXES LOCAL AND EFFICIENT.
• IN DEPTH FROM THE WATERS EDGE TO THE ORANGE CODE. THAT'S WHAT I EDGE TO THE ORANGE CODE.
• LET'S TAKE UP AMENDMENT OR CODE 295004. YOU ARE RECOGNIZED TO EXPLAIN THE AMENDMENT.
• LET'S TAKE UP AMENDMENT BAR CODE 401 NINE 28 YOU ARE RECOGNIZED. THANK YOU.

Keywords: 999, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• we cut taxes and reduce taxes, it time we cut taxes and reduce taxes, it generates<00:02:01.920>
• of the BET tax? of the BET tax?
• raising business taxes. raising business taxes.
• tax the tax revenue And it showed that tax the tax revenue would<00:32:17.440> go<00:32:17.600
• tax tax uh credit know, most of our uh tax tax uh credit type<01:26:45.840> of<01:26:46.080><

Keywords: 1191, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• And if we don't know who we're taxing or how much we're taxing, how could it be an accurate financial
• taxing or how<00:27:58.240> much<00:27:58.399> we're<00:27:58.640> taxing,<00:27
• I don't know if it I don't think taxes.
• <00:45:48.280> Um was heard in commerce and taxes. Um was heard in commerce and taxes.
• to charge a facility fee for that particular type of billing code.

Keywords: 1187, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• <00:37:44.800> Um of it is our tax dollars. Um of it is our tax dollars.
• excise tax uh hearing aid purchases. excise tax uh hearing aid purchases.
• Tax Foundation of Hawaii. Tax Foundation of Hawaii.
• code.
• code.

Keywords: 910, house, all

Summary: The joint hearing opened with House Bill 1969, which would provide state funding for colorectal cancer screenings for uninsured and underinsured residents. The Department of Human Services said it supports the goal of early screening but would need new administrative capacity, including a program manager and claim pre-screening, to run the program. The Department of Health supported the measure and cited low screening rates in Hawaii, noting an educational campaign to encourage screening. The Insurance Division raised concerns about reliance on federal FAQs, warning that guidance can change and may create state cost exposure. Supporters including the American Cancer Society Cancer Action Network and the Hawaii Medical Association argued the bill would close a preventive-care gap, reduce late-stage diagnoses, and save long-term costs; the committee also discussed implementation costs, estimated by DHS at roughly $1.4 million to $2 million annually plus administrative expenses, and a 6-month to 1-year timeline to establish the program. The committee then took up House Bill 1965, which would require health carriers to spend at least 6% of total medical expenditures on primary care providers. The Insurance Division said several provisions raise technical and legal concerns, including the premium freeze, the medical loss ratio language, the lack of an existing external review process for downcoding claims, and a new mandate for medically necessary inter-island transportation that could trigger an ACA defrayal. The Department of Human Services supported the intent but suggested broader language to include primary care supports and services, and noted that QUEST integration plans already invested at least 9% of total medical expenditures in primary care in 2024, with additional spending on supports and low-value care reductions. State health planning officials strongly supported the bill as an investment in primary care, saying it could improve outcomes and lower long-term costs, though they acknowledged a possible temporary premium increase during the transition. Testimony in support emphasized Hawaii’s physician shortage, especially on Maui, the Big Island, and other neighbor islands, and warned that clinics are under financial strain and may close without higher primary care reimbursement. The Hawaii Healthcare Task Force, AARP Hawaii, and other supporters said the bill would help retain providers, improve access for Medicare and Medicaid patients, and prevent downstream costs from emergency room use and avoidable hospitalizations. No votes or final committee action were taken in the portion of the hearing provided.

Transcript Highlights:

• font color="aaaaaa">distribution of 4.1, 6, 7 million dollars in sales tax
• font color="aaaaaa">distribution of 4.1, 6, 7 million dollars in sales tax
• 7 million dollars in sales tax revenues.
• , which is a unified tax that our customers
• taxes, which is a unified tax structure, the