Video & Transcript : 'reversal procedures' :

Page 16 of 500
HI

Hawaii 2026 Regular Session

JHA Public Hearing - Tue Feb 10, 2026 @ 2:00 PM HST

Judiciary & Hawaiian Affairs

Transcript Highlights:
  • This measure establishes the procedure that a court of the state shall follow upon the reversal or vacation
  • </c> This measure establishes the procedure This measure establishes the procedure that<00:37:13.680>
  • Preponderance that the reversal was inconsistent with evidence.
  • I do procedure for this process.
  • Um, from a civil procedure position.
Summary: The committee heard testimony on House Bill 1552, which would make the attorney general the interim chief election officer if that office becomes vacant until the Elections Commission appoints a replacement. The Department of the Attorney General opposed the bill, saying it could create a conflict of interest if the attorney general were both the state’s lawyer and the chief elections officer in any related litigation. The League of Women Voters supported having some interim backup for the office, but said it was not necessarily advocating that the attorney general fill the role. Several other testifiers, including the Hawaiian Islands Republican Women, opposed the bill, arguing the current law already provides for a prompt commission appointment and warning about partisan bias and concentration of power. Supporters, including Indivisible Hawaii, said an interim mechanism is needed to ensure election certification in a crisis. The chair also asked whether any statutory acting capacity already exists, and the attorney general said none was known. The committee then took up House Bill 2125, which would bar corporations operating under state law from engaging in election activity. The attorney general opposed the bill, citing Citizens United and arguing that corporations have First Amendment-protected political speech rights and that the bill would likely be unconstitutional. Indivisible Hawaii supported the measure, saying it would keep elections focused on the will of the people rather than corporate influence. Libertarian Party testimony was mixed: one witness supported the goal of reducing corruption but warned the bill could suppress organized dissent and sweep too broadly by treating many associations as corporations. The bill’s introducer asked whether the legislature could still enact it as a policy matter, but the attorney general maintained federal constitutional law would control. No vote was taken on either bill during the portion of the hearing provided. The committee also heard House Bill 2493 on wrongful imprisonment, which would set procedures and compensation for people whose convictions are reversed or vacated on grounds consistent with innocence and whose charges are dismissed. The Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation supported the bill’s intent but objected to language assigning it responsibility for helping released individuals secure housing, identification, health coverage, and other reentry needs, saying it no longer has jurisdiction after release and suggesting the courts or a community-based contractor handle that role. The Office of the Public Defender strongly supported the bill, emphasizing the harm of wrongful conviction and the need for compensation, case management, and medical coverage after release. No action or vote was reported on this measure in the excerpt.
CA
Transcript Highlights:
  • It was a 10-minute procedure, and we got to take a deep breath.
  • This is a reversible intervention that gives...” It's a problem, right?
  • This is a reversible intervention that gives It's literally in the name.
  • These are the procedures that we expect to be covered in your plan.
  • I'm someone who underwent the very procedures you guys advocate for. Look at me.
CA
Transcript Highlights:
  • It was a 10-minute procedure, and we got to take a deep breath.
  • This is a reversible intervention that gives... It's a problem, right?
  • This is a reversible intervention that gives... It's literally in the name.
  • These are the procedures that we expect to be covered in your plan.
  • I'm someone who underwent the very procedures you guys advocate for. Look at me. Don't look away.
LA

Louisiana 2026 Regular Session

Health and Welfare May 19th, 2026

Health and Welfare

Transcript Highlights:
  • It's a loss that can't be reversed. But every future one should be prevented.
  • It also limits agency authority and discretion and replaces it instead with rigid procedural requirements
  • It also limits agency authority and discretion and replaces it instead with rigid procedural requirements
  • It also limits agency authority and discretion and replaces it instead with rigid procedural requirements
  • But we have changed our procedures to be more responsive to families.
OK
Transcript Highlights:
  • House Bill 3697 is a simple procedural fix.
  • Currently, radiology Procedures are fixed in statute and they are the only specialty treated this way
US

US Federal 2025-2026 Regular Session

US House Floor Proceedings (Tuesday, May 20, 2025)

US Federal House Floor Meeting

Transcript Highlights:
  • </c> Congress to continue its work to reverse Congress to continue its work to reverse the<02:20:33.760
  • </c> it eliminated a fasttrack procedure it eliminated a fasttrack procedure where<04:34:12.719><c> even
  • This would likely lead to procedures.
  • eliminated expedited procedures for eliminated expedited procedures for approval<05:14:18.320><c> of
  • </c><05:15:17.680><c> makes</c> procedures. Makes sense to me. makes procedures.
Bills: SJR13 , HB1969 , HR1223 , HR426 , HR430
CA
Transcript Highlights:
  • It was a 10-minute procedure, and we got to take a deep breath.
  • This is a reversible intervention that gives... It's a problem, right?
  • This is a reversible intervention that gives It's literally in the name.
  • These are the procedures that we expect to be covered in your plan.
  • I'm someone who underwent the very procedures you guys advocate for. Look at me.
Summary: The joint hearing focused on access to gender-affirming care in California, with opening remarks from the subcommittee chairs emphasizing the importance of protecting transgender, gender-diverse, and intersex Californians and asking for decorum during public comment. The first panel from the Department of Justice, Department of Managed Health Care, and Department of Health Care Services described existing state protections, including nondiscrimination rules, privacy protections, shield laws, and Medi-Cal and commercial coverage requirements for medically necessary gender-affirming care. State officials also outlined ongoing litigation against federal actions and against hospital decisions to end or restrict care, including the Rady Children’s case and challenges to federal proposed rules and declarations affecting Medicaid, Medicare, and provider participation. Members questioned state agencies about why some hospitals that had stopped providing care had not been sued, how network adequacy is measured, whether the state can track actual access to gender-affirming care, and what legislative changes might strengthen protections. DMHC said it monitors complaints and independent medical reviews but does not track gender-affirming care as a separate provider category or collect utilization data, while DHCS said Medi-Cal continues to cover medically necessary care and that the state is preparing for possible federal rule changes. Finance staff said the previously approved $15 million for gender-affirming care was still being implemented through Covered California. The second panel featured a physician, clinic leaders, a parent, and a transgender teen describing how care is delivered and the effects of hospital closures and federal pressure. Dr. Johanna Olson-Kennedy described the history and medical basis for gender-affirming care, said minors need parental consent for medical interventions, and argued that care should be individualized and supported by families. Providers and families testified that hospital closures and insurance barriers have disrupted continuity of care, forced patients to travel farther, and shifted demand to community clinics that lack sufficient funding and contracting support. Several witnesses asked the Legislature to provide new funding, strengthen insurance enforcement, and stabilize access to care for transgender youth and families.
AZ

Arizona 2026 Regular Session

03/26/2026 - Senate Floor Session

Arizona Senate Floor Meeting

Transcript Highlights:
  • One of the most urgent services Choices provides is abortion pill reversal.
  • Women are often... ...services Choices provides is abortion pill reversal.
  • Through abortion pill reversal, at Choices, they have seen lives saved because someone was willing to
  • The second saddening procedural thing today was to deny a roll call vote when it was requested.
  • The second saddening procedural thing today was to deny a roll call vote when it was requested.
Summary: The Senate opened with prayer, the Pledge of Allegiance, attendance, and several personal privileges recognizing guests and proclamations, including a Coolidge centennial proclamation, a Pre-born Day of Rights proclamation, and a tribute to retired public servant Carmen Green Smith. The chamber also welcomed various guests and groups in the gallery, including Arizona Right to Life, Reproductive Freedom for All, a doctor of the day, schoolchildren, and community visitors. A motion to suspend the rules and immediately advance SB 1396 on contraception rights failed by a vote of 12 ayes to 16 nays. The Senate then considered House Concurrent Resolution 2053 honoring Brad Brower, adopted it unanimously, observed a moment of silence, and transmitted the resolution to the House. In Committee of the Whole, members considered HB 2072, HB 2307, and HB 2874. HB 2072, dealing with holidays and the César Chávez Day repeal/renaming debate, drew extensive floor debate over a Miranda amendment to rename the day for farm workers; that amendment failed 12-15, and the bill was ultimately advanced as amended by the committee’s striker/repeal language. HB 2307, concerning dangerous and incompetent defendants and a state facility process, received committee and floor amendments and was advanced as amended. HB 2874, relating to campaign committee termination statements and contributions, also received committee and technical floor amendments and was advanced as amended. On final third readings, HB 2874 passed 18-11 with one not voting and was transmitted to the House. HB 2307 passed 27-2 with one not voting and was transmitted to the House, with supporters emphasizing public safety and the emergency clause. HB 272 passed after a lengthy and contentious debate over whether to repeal or rename the holiday associated with César Chávez and the farm worker movement; supporters of repeal cited allegations against Chávez and the need for accountability, while opponents argued the holiday should preserve recognition of farm workers and the movement’s history. The Senate also adopted the Committee of the Whole report and assigned the bills accordingly.
FL

Florida 2025 Regular Session

Health Policy Feb 4th, 2025

Health Policy

Transcript Highlights:
  • So the plan also must include procedures that ensure actions will not conflict with federal EMTALA law
  • So the plan also must include procedures that ensure actions will not conflict with them federal EMTALA
  • Procedures that ensure actions will not conflict with federal EMTALA law; procedures to educate patients
  • On the same question, really, on the reversion, potential reversion of the MRT.
  • Additionally, a physician who performs a liposuction procedure can be fined $5,000 per procedure, where
Summary: The Senate Health Policy Committee received updates from the Agency for Health Care Administration and the Department of Health on implementation of 2024 health care laws. AHCA reviewed progress on workforce and reimbursement measures in Senate Bill 7016 and related bills, including FRAME and TEACH funding, graduate medical education reporting, behavioral health teaching hospitals, acute hospital care at home, advanced birth centers, non-emergent care access plans, and rural emergency hospitals. Agency officials said several programs are already operational or have begun payments, while others are still in rulemaking, federal approval, or report-preparation stages. Senators asked about timing, funding reversion concerns, and whether appropriated dollars would be spent on schedule, especially for behavioral health teaching hospitals and the new birth center category. The Department of Health then reported on practitioner licensure and public health programs. MQA described implementation of the Interstate Medical Licensure Compact, the Mobile Act licensure pathway, massage therapy enforcement changes, background screening expansion, liposuction safety requirements, pharmacist HIV post-exposure prophylaxis authority, and chiropractic dry needling. Public health staff updated the committee on FRAME and dental loan repayment, the Sinati screening grant program, the cancer research and innovation changes, the health care innovation council and loan program, the pediatric rare disease grant program, telehealth maternity care expansion, newborn screening for congenital CMV, the sickle cell registry and grants, and the swimming lesson voucher program. Members focused questions on how practitioners were being recruited to underserved areas, the pace of licensure approvals, and whether new programs were on track to use appropriated funds. The committee also heard a lengthy update from the Office of Medical Marijuana Use. The director reported more than 900,000 qualified patients, real-time seed-to-sale tracking now integrated across most dispensaries and labs, and ongoing compliance work on product testing, advertising, diversion, and patient safety. Senators questioned the decline in qualified physicians, how THC potency is labeled and verified, and what the agency can do about diversion to non-patients. The director said the office relies on complaints, inspections, lab audits, and coordination with law enforcement, and that patients can be suspended if violations are confirmed.
WA

Washington 2025-2026 Regular Session

Senate Law & Justice Jan 26th, 2026 at 10:30 am

Law & Justice

Transcript Highlights:
  • You have a procedural bar and then another bar. But the one is very easy, right?
  • The Attorney General must of a conviction for a reversal.
  • And on the other side of it, the adults today, adults who had this procedure done as kids, don't know
  • And on the other side of it, the adults today, adults who had this procedure done as kids, don't know
  • And on the other side of it, the adults today, adults who had this procedure done as kids, don't know
Bills: SB6087 , SB5934 , SB5520 , SB6017 , SB5890
AZ

Arizona 2026 Regular Session

01/13/2026 - House Commerce

House Commerce Committee of Reference

Transcript Highlights:
  • We did not include that recommendation for them to go back, just to align their policies and procedures
  • For example, we found that the department lacked policies and procedures for some information technology
  • security requirements intended to help state agencies implement recommended IT security procedures and
  • As part of the improvements already underway, we have implemented policies and procedures to ensure that
  • So you have no jurisdiction over the constituent getting that payout if it was reversed?
Summary: The committee met as the House Commerce Committee of Reference to hear sunset reviews and a performance audit covering the Department of Gaming, the Racing Commission, the Boxing and MMA Commission, the Barbering and Cosmetology Board, and the Arizona Sports and Tourism Authority. The Auditor General reported that the Department of Gaming and the two commissions generally met some statutory duties, but identified major issues: the department had not consistently reviewed independent audit reports for event wagering and fantasy sports operators, had disclosure and conflict-of-interest compliance gaps, lacked comprehensive complaint-handling processes, and was late distributing some compact trust fund payments to tribes. The Racing Commission needed better public records procedures, and the Boxing and MMA Commission had licensing and fee-setting issues. The department and commissions said they agreed with the findings and were implementing recommendations, with the department noting it had already begun look-back reviews, updated guidance, and additional staffing. Members also discussed consumer protection, illegal gambling, prediction markets, and whether out-of-state enforcement actions should affect Arizona licenses; the department said it would evaluate such matters case by case and generally wait for final adjudication or final regulatory action before acting. The committee then voted to recommend continuation of the Department of Gaming for two years until July 1, 2028, the Racing Commission for six years until July 1, 2032, and the Boxing and MMA Commission for six years until July 1, 2032. The Department of Gaming motion passed 7-4, the Racing Commission motion passed 10-1, and the Boxing and MMA Commission motion passed unanimously. The committee next heard the Barbering and Cosmetology Board audit. The Auditor General said the board timely processed many applications and complaints and had adopted curriculum rules, but it failed to enforce disciplinary guidelines consistently, sometimes issuing different sanctions for similar violations without documenting why it deviated from policy. The audit also found problems with reciprocity education requirements, application review quality control, inspections, open meeting and public records compliance, conflict-of-interest processes, fee-setting, and statutory clarity on scope of practice and training requirements. The board said it agreed with the findings, had already updated disciplinary parameters and documentation policies, and was working on the remaining recommendations and possible legislation. The committee then voted to continue the board for six years until July 1, 2032, and the motion passed unanimously. At the end of the meeting, the committee began hearing the Arizona Sports and Tourism Authority performance audit, but the transcript provided cuts off before that presentation was completed or any action was taken.
AZ

Arizona 2026 Regular Session

01/13/2026 - House Commerce

Commerce

Transcript Highlights:
  • For example, we found that the department lacked policies and procedures for some information technology
  • security requirements intended to help state agencies implement recommended IT security procedures and
  • So you have no jurisdiction over the constituent getting that payout if it was reversed?
  • And it develop and implement policies and procedures to document the rationale for deviations from the
  • We oversee the contractor to make sure that they're following the same procedures that we would follow
NH

New Hampshire 2025 Regular Session

Senate Health and Human Services (04/23/2025)

Health and Human Services

Transcript Highlights:
  • </c> suffering asking for this uh procedure suffering asking for this uh procedure and<00:11:09.920><
  • . procedure. procedure.
  • Um, I'm procedure eight weeks ago.
  • </c><00:53:31.040><c> improve</c> If a procedure to significantly improve If a procedure to significantly
  • This sex reversal has been girls.
MS

Mississippi 2026 Regular Session

Judiciary, Division A - Room 216, 29 January, 2026; 3:00 PM

Judiciary, Division A

Transcript Highlights:
  • </c> were some questions about the procedure were some questions about the procedure and<00:04:09.760
  • Would it be a friendly amendment to put a reverse repealer in it?
  • The amendment is a reverse repealer. Any questions on the amendment?
  • </c> be a friendly amendment to put a reverse be a friendly amendment to put a reverse repealer<00:13
  • Uh any amendment is a reverse repealer.
MN

Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session

House Health Finance and Policy Committee 3/26/25

Health Finance and Policy

Transcript Highlights:
  • </c><00:12:52.720><c> This</c> delicate ocular procedures. This delicate ocular procedures.
  • :15:40.639><c> expanded</c> reser reversed optometry's expanded reser reversed optometry's expanded scope
  • </c><00:19:04.000><c> before</c> observing hundreds of procedures before observing hundreds of procedures
  • </c> to do injections or eyelid procedures to do injections or eyelid procedures risks<00:20:02.240><
  • Injections around lowrisk procedures.
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Public Health Mar 10th, 2025

Public Health

Transcript Highlights:
  • How do we reverse engineer aging? It's really hard.
  • How can we reverse inflammaging? There's a lot of potential ways.
  • Reverse transgenic models of amyloid deposition.
  • Chairman, I have a procedure...
  • Lots of people come in and out of the room during a procedure.
Bills: HB5 , HJR3 , HB155 , HB513 , HB5 , HB155
Committee: House Public Health
AR

Arkansas 2026 Regular Session

ALC-CLAIMS REVIEW/LITIGATION REPORTS OVERSIGHT Mar 16th, 2026

ALC-CLAIMS REVIEW/LITIGATION REPORTS OVERSIGHT

Transcript Highlights:
  • So I've got some questions over procedure.”
  • But I'm happy to answer any questions about the procedural history of this claim.
  • Wesson's procedure.
  • But we don't have any procedure where we just notify them that, and ...any procedure where we just notify
  • Simpson asked for several, asserted several issues of presumed reversible error.
Summary: The committee first reviewed several wage-claim and labor-related litigation reports from the Department of Labor and Licensing. Members questioned the department’s authority and jurisdiction, whether it was acting like a court, and why it sought attorney’s fees and costs. Department staff explained that the claims arose under the Arkansas Minimum Wage Act and related labor statutes, that the department investigates small wage claims and can file suit when informal resolution fails, and that filing fees are waived by statute though service costs may be incurred. The committee reviewed individual cases, including one where the employer had not proven cash payments, another that had already been paid and dismissed, and a third where service could not yet be completed. The committee then voted to review or batch-file the labor items. The University of Arkansas System then reported on three pending lawsuits under the litigation-notification statute. One case involving a tenured professor alleging age and race discrimination had already been resolved and dismissed after the university re-engaged in discussions about a position. A second case involving a former employee alleging ADA and FMLA retaliation was moving forward after partial dismissal and an answer denying liability. A third case involved a former vendor employee alleging retaliation tied to a parking ticket; members asked about individual-capacity exposure for a university police sergeant, and counsel explained that punitive damages could potentially create personal exposure. The committee reviewed each report. The Department of Finance and Administration presented a proposed tax settlement reducing a sales-and-use tax assessment from about $48,000 to $20,000, with interest and penalties waived, and the committee approved it. The Claims Commission then presented several claims and settlements, including an unpaid salary differential for the Department of Health, reissued warrants, unpaid bills for DHS, and multiple negotiated settlements involving UAMS, Arkansas State Police, and ARDOT; these were generally approved or batched for approval. The most extensive discussion involved a settlement between the Teacher Retirement System and Tetronics International Limited in liquidation, arising from losses tied to the failed Blue Oak project; members questioned the company’s liquidation status, the prior investment loss, and why the matter was settling for $65,000, and the committee ultimately affirmed the settlement. The committee also heard a disputed tax-sale claim involving the Commissioner of State Lands, where a claimant argued that excess proceeds from a 2009 tax sale should have gone to her family rather than escheating to the county. After testimony from the claimant and counsel, members debated sovereign immunity, heirship, and whether the committee could or should award the $4,200 overage. The motion was amended and then replaced with a motion to hold the matter over for further review in a future joint session, which passed. Finally, the committee considered an appeal by Andrew Simpson challenging dismissal of his claim against the Arkansas Court of Appeals; after Simpson and court staff explained the underlying dispute, the committee reviewed the dismissal and the matter was held over for further consideration.