Video & Transcript Research : 'fiscal transparency'

Page 16 of 500
ND

North Dakota 2025-2026 Regular Session

Senate Appropriations - Education and Environment Division Apr 7th, 2025 at 02:30 pm

Appropriations - Education and Environment Division

Transcript Highlights:
  • And basically, if you look at the fiscal note on that, you will see that they're talking about $1.5 million
  • It's in the fiscal note, but not appropriated in the bill. Okay. Okay.
  • , so then if we're taking the $1.5 million out and we're taking the $310,000 out, then there's no fiscal
  • Well, there's no, the fiscal note, yeah, it wasn't in there.
  • No, the fiscal note, yeah, it wasn't in there.
Bills: SB2004, HB1600
Summary: The committee reconvened to continue work on water-related appropriations and related bills, with the chair emphasizing the need to move the water bill to conference committee soon because of differences with the House. Members reviewed project funding levels and carryover balances across several water projects, including NAWS, Southwest, Valley City, Cirrus River flood control, Hart River, Redder water supply, municipal and rural water, general water, and discretionary funding. The discussion focused on reduced revenue forecasts, the use of a $150 million line of credit as a working assumption, and concerns about large carryover amounts and piling up cash. No final changes were made to the water funding numbers, but the chair said the committee would revisit the bill after further cleanup of the draft language. The committee then took up House Bill 1600, which would create an immigration law clinic at the University of North Dakota law school. Members agreed the program should be treated as a one-time pilot rather than ongoing general fund spending, so they adopted an amendment changing the $400,000 appropriation to one-time funding from the strategic investment fund. The amended bill passed unanimously, and Senator Meyer was assigned to carry it. House Bill 1417, dealing with parole and probation-related policy, was also amended. The committee removed Section 8, which eliminated the bill’s appropriations language, based on testimony that the referenced funding was already included elsewhere in the budget. The amended bill then passed unanimously. The committee also discussed possible future amendments to water study language, including earlier reporting deadlines and a proposal to require larger new water project requests to go through the Water Topics Overview Committee before being introduced, but no final action was taken on those concepts. Several other bills, including the AI-related House Bill 1448 and law enforcement bonus bill 1193, were left for later consideration.
TX
Transcript Highlights:
  • Because of our open nature, because of transparency, reciprocity, but we have an adversary particularly
  • Governing Boards by implementing this requirement Senate Bill 452 increases transparency and ensures
  • The bill also seeks to create more transparency surrounding faculty.
  • Senate Bill 37 will ensure this transparency and accountability. at all of our academic institutions
  • Some do, like A&M does, the transparency requirements and.
AL

Alabama 2026 1st Special Session

Alabama House Transportation, Utilities and Infrastructure Committee Mar 11th, 2026

Transportation, Utilities and Infrastructure

Transcript Highlights:
  • Notably, the fiscal note on this bill does not provide an estimate of what those costs look like.
  • And the lack of that fiscal note, the clear cost is an issue.
  • And the lack of that<00:55:00.800> fiscal<00:55:01.200> note,<00:55:01.680> the<
  • 02.000> clear<00:55:02.319> cost<00:55:03.040> is<00:55:03.359> an that fiscal
  • note, the clear cost is an that fiscal note, the clear cost is an issue.<00:55:04.800> These<
MN

Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session

House Public Safety Finance and Policy Committee 4/8/26

Public Safety Finance and Policy

Transcript Highlights:
  • Representative Bakeberg, please come to the testify table with your testifiers. hear today have fiscal
  • impacts either hear today have fiscal impacts either general<00:01:38.640> fund<00:01:39.200>
  • So I I'm just looking at transparency.
  • Then for fiscal 28, um, it goes down to 878 plus the 2.49 million again that is in the base.
  • Then for fiscal 28, um, it goes down to 878 plus the 2.49 million again that is in the base.
NM

New Mexico 2026 Regular Session

Senate - Finance Feb 11th, 2026 at 04:38 pm

Senate Finance

Transcript Highlights:
  • Senate Bill 190 is a... ...a targeted, fiscally responsible bonding bill focused on expanding access
  • , being that this wasn't, and I don't know if you already discussed this, but this doesn't have a fiscal
  • , being that this wasn't, and I don't know if you already discussed this, but this doesn't have a fiscal
  • Line 159, and I would submit, is not needed to provide a supplemental appropriation before the fiscal
  • So that's money towards DFA to not only reform the capital outlay portion and make it more transparent
Bills: SB152, SB145, SB190, HB247
NM

New Mexico 2026 Regular Session

Senate - Finance Feb 11th, 2026 at 09:05 am

Senate Finance

Transcript Highlights:
  • It changes the entire structure of the accountability and transparency in this state.
  • And as was mentioned already, the model right now essentially has more transparency and accountability
  • You're giving them a budget increase in their base, and then before the fiscal year has even started,
  • That's only half of the year is covered, not the full fiscal year.
  • That's only half of the year is covered, not the full fiscal year.
Bills: SB152, SB145, SB190, HB247
AZ

Arizona 2026 Regular Session

02/09/2026 - Senate Finance

Finance

Transcript Highlights:
  • Documentation, transparency.
  • They lack transparency about how they reach their voting recommendations.
  • Do we want to have transparency in that?
  • I believe there will be a fiscal note on this.
  • You'd probably capture most households and lower the fiscal cost.
Summary: The committee first approved the February 2, 2026 minutes and held Senate Bill 1090. It then heard Senate Bill 1503, which would require pension fiduciaries and proxy advisory firms to act solely in the economic interest of plan participants and beneficiaries, prohibit ESG- or ideology-based voting, require disclosures and economic analyses in certain cases, and authorize attorney general enforcement. The sponsor said the bill was meant to protect investors and align with federal action. Testimony was mixed: a policy witness supported the bill, while representatives of ASRS and PSPRS said they were neutral but raised concerns about added costs, operational burdens, reporting requirements, possible conflicts with existing fiduciary duties, and increased litigation risk. After debate, the committee voted 4-3 to give SB 1503 a do-pass recommendation. The committee then considered Senate Bill 1293, which would prohibit GPLET school-district revenues from being abated during the eight-year abatement period. Supporters argued the bill would protect school funding and reduce state aid backfill costs, and a Goldwater Institute witness said it would also reduce gift-clause concerns by limiting subsidies that shift costs to other taxpayers. City and economic development representatives from Phoenix, Mesa, and the Greater Phoenix Economic Council opposed the bill, saying GPLET is an important redevelopment tool that helps finance projects in urban cores and that the change would reduce its effectiveness and slow revitalization. The committee adopted an amendment and then passed SB 1293 on a 4-3 vote. Next, the committee heard Senate Bill 1414, which gives insurers 30 days to review and respond to third-party settlement demands in bodily injury claims. Insurance representatives supported the bill as a commercially reasonable timeframe, while the Arizona Trial Lawyers Association opposed it, arguing that 30 days would become a minimum and could delay settlements for injured claimants; members discussed a possible 15-day compromise. The committee passed SB 1414 by a 5-2 vote. It also passed Senate Bill 1633, which creates an income tax subtraction for capital gains from the sale of a primary residence after a five-year residency; opponents warned it would mainly benefit wealthy homeowners and cost the state tens of millions annually, while the sponsor said it could help housing turnover. Finally, the committee passed SB 1429, as amended, allowing Senate and House leaders to designate board members for the Arizona Commerce Authority, SB 1536, which lets municipalities consolidate multiple street-light improvement districts, and heard SB 1724, which clarifies when property splits or consolidations trigger a limited property value recalculation to prevent tax-base manipulation.
NM

New Mexico 2026 Regular Session

Senate - Education Jan 28th, 2026 at 09:05 am

Senate Education

Transcript Highlights:
  • It improves transparency and family understanding.
  • It improves transparency and family understanding.
  • It improves transparency and family understanding.
  • I mean, somehow I read that in this second page of the fiscal impact report.
  • And the only other concern I had was there was a, in the fiscal impact report, it mentioned, and this
Bills: SB64, SB19, SB44, SB83
TX
Transcript Highlights:
  • There is a small fiscal note and in my understanding is the comptroller note on this one.
  • The fiscal impact and consequences without the additional funding school districts will be.
  • I had a question about the judicial transparency information. Okay. And it starts on page 16.
  • We tried to streamline the process. this bill and make it more transparent.
  • And by which transparency could be revealed for everybody. No. So with that, thank you. house.
Bills: SB260, SB263, SB293, SJR18
MN

Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session

House Judiciary Finance and Civil Law Committee 2/18/25

Judiciary Finance and Civil Law

Transcript Highlights:
  • also kind of wondering about the fiscal also kind of wondering about the fiscal impact<00:31:46.840
  • fiscal fiscal impacts<00:31:54.480> to<00:31:55.240> um<00:31:55.720> the<00:31
  • Committee and we just got the fiscal Committee and we just got the fiscal note<00:50:09.079>
  • We're for transparency. In fact, my office has a transparency dashboard. You can Google it.
  • those things but we're very transparent those things but we're very transparent about<01:09:42.040
Bills: HF7
TX
Transcript Highlights:
  • Members, that cannot go to local and. tested because of the fiscal note.
  • It's really about transparency and disclosure.
  • Leading to this, you're just saying transparency; you have to be full disclosure.
  • That reads, you know, there is a little bit of a fiscal note that may go away.
  • The driving theme of this Legislation is both transparency and privacy.