Video & Transcript Research : 'commodity assessment'

Page 16 of 417
OK

Oklahoma 2026 Regular Session

Education 3RD REVISED Feb 24th, 2026 at 10:30 am

Education

Transcript Highlights:
  • Thank you, committee, said about 1632 Simply places administrative authority for career readiness assessments
  • Virtual instruction if the high school site is completing statewide assessments.
  • And so I'm giving schools the option in terms of how they are making the assessment for that retention
  • My other line of question is really on screeners versus diagnostic assessments.
  • The diagnostic assessment kind of comes in and then keys in on this specific standard or skill.
TX
Transcript Highlights:
  • at how other agencies have addressed that so that the people actually feel that it's an honest assessment
  • And finally, it clarified. that a city may still assess a fee for the issuance of any approval permit
HI

Hawaii 2026 Regular Session

AGR Public Hearing - Wed Feb 11, 2026 @ 9:30 AM HST

Agriculture & Food Systems

Transcript Highlights:
  • Um, you know, there is a requirement when you're transporting commodities of, I believe, it is 100 or
  • Um, you know, there is a requirement when you're transporting commodities of, I believe, it is 100 or
  • of I believe it transporting commodities of I believe it is<00:32:04.799> $100<00:32:05.600><
  • It requires establishment of a biological aquatic risk-based framework for assessment and approval of
  • <00:49:21.599> and riskbased framework for assessment and riskbased framework for assessment
HI

Hawaii 2025 Regular Session

AGR Public Hearing - Tue Mar 12, 2025 @ 9:00 AM HST

Agriculture & Food Systems

Transcript Highlights:
  • ; it's other commodities.
  • it's not just agricultural Commodities it's not just agricultural Commodities it's<02:16:01.480>
  • 16:02.840> we<02:16:03.000> have it's other Commodities and then we have it's other Commodities
  • <02:16:08.840> so specific to agricultural Commodities so specific to agricultural Commodities
  • <02:43:02.640> and Agricultural Product or commodity and Agricultural Product or commodity
Keywords: 910, house, all
MN

Minnesota 2025 1st Special Session

House Agriculture Finance and Policy Committee 3/26/25

Agriculture Finance and Policy

Transcript Highlights:
  • Are there pathways that we can target to effectively prevent CWD prion uptake in commodities?
  • There is research showing that those prions can be uptaken in commodities like alfalfa.
  • So the research community has already identified commodities as a potential concern, hence the bill.
  • <00:27:50.640> like<00:27:51.279> um uptaken in commodities like um uptaken in commodities
  • million dollars for uh risk assessment million dollars for uh risk assessment in<01:00:50.880>
MN
Transcript Highlights:
  • It helps strengthen commodity values, supports more processing and value-added activity, and gives farmers
  • It helps strengthen commodity values, supports more processing and value-added activity, and gives farmers
  • It helps strengthen commodity values, supports more processing and value-added activity, and gives farmers
  • uh that do not require those commodities uh that do not require any<00:37:24.160> diversion<00
  • the broader context in which assess the broader context in which we're<00:42:35.520> legislating.
Keywords: 919, house, all
Summary: The committee took up House File 1669, adopting the DE2 amendment, which was described as the bill itself. The amended bill would expand Minnesota’s sustainable aviation fuel (SAF) tax credit by increasing annual allocations, extending the sunset date from 2030 to 2035, adding an extra credit for lower-carbon fuels, and adding environmental and other qualifying requirements. The chair noted the amendment aligned the bill with the governor’s proposal, and the amendment was approved on a voice vote. Testimony was overwhelmingly supportive. Commissioner Tom Peterson of the Minnesota Department of Agriculture backed the bill as a way to preserve Minnesota’s leadership in SAF, attract private investment, and keep crop and timber feedstocks processed in-state. Farmers and agricultural groups, including Minnesota Farmers Union and Minnesota Farm Bureau, said SAF could create new domestic markets for crops such as corn, soybeans, winter camelina, and pennycress while improving farm income and supporting climate-smart practices. Forestry representatives argued that wood waste and forest residue could be turned into SAF, improving forest health and reducing wildfire risk. Environmental and clean-energy groups also supported the bill, emphasizing the added guardrails. The Minnesota Environmental Partnership, Friends of the Mississippi River, and Fresh Energy said the amendments would better protect water quality, soil health, biodiversity, and climate outcomes by favoring lower-carbon SAF and limiting harmful land-use change. University of Minnesota Forever Green representatives said winter-hardy crops could scale over time, and they pointed to ongoing commercialization work and a 1 Million Acre Scaling Study. Labor and construction groups said the bill would support major infrastructure investment and create long-term jobs, with testimony citing the first Minnesota SAF facility already announced and the potential for multiple hubs statewide. No vote on final passage was taken in the portion provided, but the committee heard extensive supportive testimony and questions focused on scalability, infrastructure, and how the credit would accelerate SAF development in Minnesota.
NH

New Hampshire 2026 Regular Session

House Environment and Agriculture (01/13/2026)

Environment and Agriculture

Transcript Highlights:
  • And to make an assessment of what are the mandated programs the division currently oversees.
  • And so the way that risk assessment.
  • Most of which is on the commodity crops that are treated in this bill.
  • Most of which is on the commodity US.
  • crops that are affected by commodity crops that are affected by this<04:11:12.319> bill.
Keywords: 1189, house, all
FL

Florida 2026 Regular Session

Governmental Oversight and Accountability Feb 18th, 2025

Governmental Oversight and Accountability

Transcript Highlights:
  • In the event that a commodity or contractual service isn't available on a state term contract, there
  • from other state entities or governmental entities within the United States, and they have been assessed
  • If commodity or contractual services is available on that state term contract or that alternate contract
  • partners at Florida's Digital Service to improve these processes as we seek to find value for IT commodities
Summary: The Committee on Governmental Oversight and Accountability met with a quorum present and first took up SB 268, a public records exemption bill for public officers. Senator Brodeur explained the bill on behalf of Senator Jones, saying it would protect partial home addresses, phone numbers, and certain family information for the governor, cabinet members, and other elected officials because of threats and harassment against public servants. An amendment narrowing and clarifying the definition of public officer and the process for claiming the exemption was adopted without objection. Chair Fine and Senator Brodeur both spoke in support of the bill, citing personal experiences with threats and the need to protect officials and their families. CS for SB 268 was then reported favorably by roll call vote. The committee then heard a presentation from Brandon Spencer, Director of State Purchasing and Chief Procurement Officer at the Department of Management Services, on state agency procurement and contracting practices, including IT procurements. He described the state’s procurement structure, including state term contracts, alternate contract sources, and agency procurements, and said the division now manages more than 960 enterprise-wide agreements, with that number continuing to grow. He also highlighted that roughly 21% of purchase order spend is on IT services, discussed statutory requirements for IT procurements, and said the division is working with Florida Digital Service to improve oversight, training, vendor accountability, and procurement options. No committee action followed the presentation, and the meeting adjourned after no further business was raised.
HI

Hawaii 2026 Regular Session

AEN-EDT, AEN Public Hearings 02-06-2026

Agriculture and Environment

Transcript Highlights:
  • <00:43:25.520> coordinator given thank you a commodity coordinator given thank you a commodity
  • risk from um know in order to assess risk from um potential<01:04:44.400> drift<01:04:45.520>
  • to assess to assess >> and<01:05:28.079> that's<01:05:28.319> not<01:05:28.640
  • that are farming different commodities. that are farming different commodities.
  • >> Uh, so that would be based on EPA's risk assessments as far as, um, the routes of exposure.
Summary: The committee heard testimony on SP 2350, which would transfer oversight of the Department of Agriculture’s Agricultural Development Division and the aquaculture and livestock support services branch to the Agribusiness Development Corporation. The Department of Agriculture and ADC both testified, with ADC opposing the bill as written while supporting the goal of strengthening agriculture. ADC said the transfer could create federal operational and coordination risks, jeopardize federal funding and program continuity, and was unnecessary because ADC is a business development entity, not a regulatory agency. The Hawaii Farmers Union also expressed concern that moving the programs could weaken the department’s ability to access federal resources, while the Hawaii Farm Bureau submitted written testimony and the Hawaii Aquaculture and Aquaponics Association and H-Plan were noted as supporting the measure; the Hawaii Cattlemen’s Council was noted as opposing it. Much of the discussion focused on aquaculture’s economic potential and the role of regulation, permitting, and funding. Committee members questioned why aquaculture had not grown faster, citing current gross revenues of about $66 million last year, a prior high of $82 million, and a possible long-term target of $500 million. Testimony identified permitting and feed costs as major barriers, along with market conditions and water quality issues affecting producers. ADC described ongoing efforts on feed development, permitting streamlining, coastal-state collaboration on seaweed and restorative aquaculture, and national advocacy for more parity in seafood import standards. Members also pressed the Department of Agriculture on its leadership and priorities, criticizing the lack of bills and resources dedicated to aquaculture and asking whether the department should have more authority to pursue land purchases and development opportunities. The department said it relies on divisions and industry feedback for bill ideas, noted it funds an annual aquaculture survey, and said it was pursuing congressional earmarks and other funding for aquaculture parks, research, and export/import issues. ADC said it would work with the department if the bill passed, but that its current statute does not give it regulatory authority and any such change would require a statutory amendment.
US
Transcript Highlights:
  • I ask that you assess the ramifications of the loss of food production from within our borders.
  • We grow over 40 different commodities.
  • You know, we have so much of our farm program is on commodities, dairy included, but the specialty crops
  • This is tiny compared to the 6.3 billion that we spend on the commodity. crop program.
  • We ask the committee to update the wool marketing loan rate that, unlike other commodities, has not been
Summary: The committee meeting focused on crucial discussions surrounding the challenges faced by the agriculture sector, particularly concerning avian flu and its impact on poultry and dairy producers. Members provided insights into the economic struggles within the industry, emphasizing the need for a new bipartisan farm bill that addresses the diverse needs of specialty crop and livestock producers. Witnesses from various agricultural sectors spoke about their experiences, illustrating the high costs, regulatory burdens, and emerging diseases that threaten their operations. The meeting underscored a commitment to exploring solutions that will help maintain market stability and ensure food security.
AL

Alabama 2025 Regular Session

Alabama House Transportation, Utilities and Infrastructure Committee Feb 26th, 2025

Transportation, Utilities and Infrastructure

Transcript Highlights:
  • The provision of this bill is to exempt electric utility commodities from... ...exempt electric utility
  • commodities from the requirement of obtaining an oversized permit for movement on the state highway
  • I echo Representative Given's assessment of the safety consciousness and the focus on safety that utilities
  • The annual permit both protects the carrier, the hauler, and the utility company that is moving commodities
Bills: SB42, HB323
MN

Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session

Agriculture Committee Meeting - 2025-03-26

Agriculture Finance and Policy

Transcript Highlights:
  • essential that we invest in the research to understand the threat of prion uptake by plants, including commodities
  • Are there pathways that we can develop to effectively prevent CWD prion uptake in commodities?
  • Prions can be uptaken, showing they can be uptaken in commodities like alfalfa.
  • So the research community has already identified commodities as a potential concern, and hence the bill
  • So here we're laying a bill over today that allocates a million dollars for a risk assessment in urban
CA

California 2025-2026 Regular Session

Assembly Insurance Committee Apr 2nd, 2025

Transcript Highlights:
  • In many cases, satellite photos were used to assess roof conditions, resulting in policies being incorrectly
  • The days of people coming to your home to assess are, by and large, long gone.
  • payments—in other words, commodity-in-kind for work—there's no record of you, and then you're not subject
  • a cash-based employee, even are off-the-books employee, or in some cases we found incidences of commodity-based
  • payments, in other words, commodity-in-kind for work, there's no record of you, and then you're not
Summary: The Assembly Insurance Committee met as a subcommittee and heard several bills focused on insurance transparency, wildfire mitigation, market access, and workforce issues. AB 75 would require insurers to give homeowners 30 days’ notice before collecting aerial images of their property and allow homeowners to review those images; supporters said it would improve privacy and prevent inaccurate non-renewals, while consumer and industry groups both sought amendments. AB 234 would add the Assembly Speaker and Senate President pro Tem, or designees, as non-voting members on the California FAIR Plan governing committee; the Department of Insurance supported it as an oversight measure, while Consumer Federation of California said it was only a small first step toward broader transparency reforms. AB 428 would let water corporations join joint powers authorities for pooled insurance, with supporters citing rising insurance costs for small water systems and no remaining opposition after amendments. AB 943 would streamline producer pre-licensing education by removing the 20-hour per-line requirement while keeping ethics training; industry sponsors said it would reduce barriers to entry, while consumer advocates warned it could lower professional standards. AB 1209 would create a pathway for cannabis employers to secure workers’ compensation coverage and related services through a state-coordinated network; supporters said it would help bring the industry into compliance, while one member raised concerns about creating a special carveout for a federally restricted industry. AB 1 would require periodic review of the state’s Safer from Wildfire regulations every five years, and it drew broad support from the department, insurers, local governments, and industry groups as a way to keep wildfire mitigation incentives current. The committee also took up a consent calendar including AB 69, AB 487, and AB 570, all of which were sent to Appropriations. The committee approved AB 75 to Privacy and Consumer Protection, AB 234 to the Assembly Floor, AB 428 to Local Government, AB 943 to Appropriations, AB 1209 to Business and Professions, and AB 1 to Appropriations. Most measures passed on strong or unanimous votes after members added coauthor requests and expressed support for the bills’ consumer protection, transparency, or wildfire-related goals.
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Energy Resources May 12th, 2025

Energy Resources

Transcript Highlights:
  • This leads to complexities for our Commercial Motor Vehicle Division in being able to assess what they're
  • They’re altering their commodity so they can get back on the highway.
  • I have not actually been physically at either the Los Indios or the Star Commodity Far Bridge, but I
  • us an opportunity to potentially shed some light on how legitimate commerce can continue in every commodity
  • Like the Star Commodity Bridge, obviously we...
Bills: SB290, SB2949
MN

Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session

House Energy Finance and Policy Committee 3/12/26

Energy Finance and Policy

Transcript Highlights:
  • Historically, these filings had significant engagement by intervening parties while risk assessment and
  • If you'd want to come before the committee here, introduce yourself. risk assessment and performance
  • <00:08:32.719> and parties while risk assessment and parties while risk assessment and performance
  • in 2002 and had um assessment in 2002 and had um assessment requirements<00:34:38.320> that
  • But energy and this is the good news about solar: it is pretty much a one-for-one commodity, right?
Bills: HF3830, HF3688
NH

New Hampshire 2025 Regular Session

House Ways and Means (03/25/2025)

Transcript Highlights:
  • Um and commodity commodity commodity trading<00:13:43.040> is<00:13:43.279> a<00:13:43.440
  • entities that assess this property.
  • assessment and a DRA assessment.
  • assessment. That was their big rub. assessment. That was their big rub.
  • Does the DRA use subjective assessments, or what is the standard that is used to get to an assessment
Keywords: 928, house, all
Summary: The hearing focused on House Bill 302, which would allow the state treasurer to invest public funds in precious metals and digital assets. The sponsor was not present, so Representative Urs introduced the bill briefly and said he did not know much about it. No one from the Treasury Department testified, and members repeatedly noted the treasurer’s absence. Susan Elme testified against the bill, arguing that these investments are highly volatile and contrary to the treasury’s duty to remain stable and liquid. She said the bill should be killed. In questioning, she estimated the 5% cap in the bill would amount to roughly $10 million, depending on available funds, and said such investing would be more appropriate for an individual day trader than for the state treasury. Members also discussed prior legislative experience with Bitcoin-related proposals and raised concerns about whether the treasury had the staff expertise to manage commodity or digital asset investing. The committee did not take a final vote; instead, it agreed to hold a work session and seek additional information from the treasurer, with a plan to revisit the bill on April 1.
AZ

Arizona 2026 Regular Session

03/25/2026 - Senate Judiciary and Elections

Judiciary and Elections

Transcript Highlights:
  • procedures relating to the enforcement of a defendant's default on the payment of fines, surcharges, assessment
  • The bill establishes an additional assessment of $200 to be levied on each person convicted of paying
  • or agreeing to pay for sexual conduct and requires the additional assessment to be deposited into the
  • experiencing homelessness to perform community restitution in lieu of paying all or part of the $20 assessment
Summary: The committee first heard HB 2825, which would replace criminal enforcement tools for nonpayment of fines, fees, restitution, and related obligations with a civil collection process. Supporters, including the sponsor, argued it would streamline restitution collection and reduce costly incarceration, while opponents from victims’ rights groups, judges, and prosecutors said it would weaken victims’ constitutional rights and remove effective enforcement leverage. The chair adopted an amendment requiring a summons and clarifying that victims’ constitutional remedies are preserved, and the committee passed the bill 5-2. The committee then considered HB 4070, which would bar corporations from incorporating if an officer, director, or trustee had been convicted of sex or human trafficking, and would extend civil liability to those who facilitate trafficking. Supporters framed it as a “corporate death penalty” aimed at preventing trafficking through corporate governance, while the ACLU warned the facilitation language was vague and could sweep too broadly. After adopting the chair’s amendment defining “facilitate,” the committee passed the bill 5-2. The committee also unanimously recommended confirmation of Neil McDowell to the Arizona Board of Executive Clemency after hearing his background in corrections and his plans to review cases thoroughly and efficiently. Next, HB 2720 was heard, which would raise penalties for paying or agreeing to pay for sexual conduct, add a $200 assessment for the anti-human trafficking fund, and allow certain sex-trafficking victims convicted of prostitution to seal vacated records. Supporters, including law enforcement, prosecutors, and survivor advocates, said it would deter demand and help victims; opponents argued it could still sweep in trafficking victims and lacked sufficient safeguards. The committee passed the bill 4-3. The committee also heard HB 2028, a strike-everything amendment allowing community restitution in lieu of a $20 assessment for indigent homeless defendants, and HB 2047, which would increase trespass penalties for remaining in or returning to property after an eviction writ; both were discussed but no final vote is reflected in the transcript excerpt. Additional bills were introduced and heard later in the meeting, including HB 2136, which would create new offenses for “civil terrorism” and “subversion” and increase penalties for certain highway obstruction; the ACLU opposed it as viewpoint discrimination. HB 2406 would make images and recordings of abused children and deceased minors confidential and restrict dissemination and monetization; the sponsor said it was intended to prevent re-victimization and misuse of public records, while defense-side speakers asked for clearer access for defense teams. HB 2415 would tighten regulation of kratom products and specifically target concentrated 7-OH products; testimony sharply split between supporters who described public-health risks and opponents who said prohibition would harm consumers who use it for pain or recovery. The transcript ends before any final action on those later bills is shown.
HI
Transcript Highlights:
  • Our concern: the initial companion bill was about having water availability assessments, evaluations,
  • , evaluations and and to put assessments, evaluations and and to put up<00:40:57.680> information<
  • and um that's readily assessments and um that's readily available<00:41:55.040> should<00:41:
  • They would do an assessment of how much RPT would be generated as the development comes in, and then
  • They would do an assessment<01:21:57.040> of<01:21:57.280> how<01:21:57.520> much
Summary: The House Housing Committee heard testimony on a series of housing-related Senate bills. SB 2190 SD2 on inclusionary zoning drew support from HHFDC, Hawaii YIMBY, Grassroot Institute, Housing Hawaii’s Future, and Hako Seed Center, with opposition from OHA and Aloha Independent Living Hawaii. SB 2338 SD1, dealing with housing agency personnel authority, received comments from the Attorney General cautioning that the bill should be clarified to avoid conflicts with civil service and collective bargaining laws and recommending removal of a provision limiting employment contracts; HHFDC said its comments addressed those concerns and supported the measure. SB 2424 SD1, concerning HHFDC, received broad support from housing, business, and community groups, with one opposition. Testimony focused on changing the definition of “qualified resident” so people who already own an HHFDC-assisted unit could later purchase another if their housing needs change; HHFDC said the current rule forces people to sell before buying again and that the bill would help people move up the housing ladder and encourage more housing development. SB 2356 on parking also drew broad support from state agencies, housing advocates, business groups, and local officials, with Unite Here Local 5 in opposition. SB 2981 on land use had strong support from many organizations and 67 individuals, with Unite Here Local 5 opposing. SB 3028 SD2 on property conveyance generated the most detailed policy debate. Supporters, including Catholic Charities Hawaii, Hawaii Children’s Action Network, Indivisible Hawaii, and others, backed restructuring the conveyance tax into a marginal rate system and urged changes to revenue allocations, including dedicated funding for homeless services, DHHL, and the rental housing revolving fund. The Tax Foundation of Hawaii supported the marginal-rate concept but opposed dedicated special-fund allocations and criticized the bill’s blank sections. Committee members questioned the historical purpose of the conveyance tax, and the Tax Foundation explained it was originally a modest tax tied to property-value tracking when the state still ran the property tax system. The committee also heard SB 3187 SD2 on off-site construction, SB 2378 SD2 on housing permitting, and SB 2398 SD2 on residential housing utilities. OPSD supported SB 3187 but said it preferred the House version and wanted clarification that off-site certification should apply to factories in Hawaii, not out of state, to avoid outsourcing labor; it also suggested starting with a small scope. SB 2378 SD2 drew support from engineering, housing, and labor groups, with testimony that the House version included needed fixes to make the program insurable. On SB 2398 SD2, the Board of Water Supply opposed the bill, saying it could require disclosure of sensitive infrastructure information beyond ordinary water-availability assessments and raise critical-infrastructure and cybersecurity concerns; developers and housing groups supported the measure. No votes or final actions were taken in the portion of the hearing provided.
MN

Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session

House Public Safety Finance and Policy Committee 3/10/26

Public Safety Finance and Policy

Transcript Highlights:
  • One thing she also heard consistently is that there really needs to be lethality assessments done in
  • So they have asked the task force to look at that and have a consistent lethality assessment across the
  • <00:47:12.960> done needs to be lethality assessments done needs to be lethality assessments
  • that and have a<00:47:17.680> consistent<00:47:18.319> lethality<00:47:18.960> assessment
  • <00:47:19.680> across a consistent lethality assessment across a consistent lethality assessment
FL

Florida 2026 Regular Session

Appropriations Mar 2nd, 2026

Appropriations

Transcript Highlights:
  • It provides that a 60-day period is available to contest an assessment or a denial that becomes final
  • Because at the end of the day, babies shouldn't be commodities.
  • Women's bodies shouldn't be commodities. And I think we all agree to that.
  • Because at the end of the day, babies shouldn't be commodities.
  • Women's bodies shouldn't be commodities. And I think we all agree to that.
Summary: The Appropriations Committee met and considered a large agenda of bills, reporting several measures favorably. Early action included SB 6, a settled claim bill involving the Department of Children and Families and the estate of Leila Estrada and Sapphire Williams, which was approved for $3.8 million. The committee also passed a cybersecurity internships bill creating a Department of Commerce program with Cyber Florida, and SB 532, which lets clerks of court retain the full amount of certain excess revenue and clarifies foreclosure-sale procedures. Veterans housing measures, CS for CS for SB 1602 and SB 1604, were approved to create a pilot program and a related trust fund for vacancy relief and risk mitigation for veteran housing. The committee also favorably reported SB 1110 on Medicaid and insurance coverage for orthotics and prosthetics, with emotional testimony from a student and family describing the high cost and importance of activity-specific prosthetics. Members also approved CS for CS for SB 1012 after adopting an amendment that removed inmate emergency and specialty medical service compensation provisions while retaining changes to the contractor-operated institutions inmate welfare trust fund. Another bill, CS for CS for SB 1614, was narrowed by a delete-all amendment to focus on limiting the use of excess fees for new building construction by local governments. All of these measures were reported favorably after brief debate, with some support testimony submitted in writing or waived. The most extensive discussion centered on CS for CS for SB 17, a major Medicaid and public assistance overhaul. The bill would create a Joint Legislative Committee on Medicaid Oversight, allow the Legislature to retain its own actuary, tighten Medicaid program oversight, update encounter-data reporting, set performance standards for managed care plans, revise pharmacy benefit manager rules, and require DCF to implement SNAP fraud-reduction and payment-accuracy reforms, including photo IDs on EBT cards and updated work requirements. It also would direct agencies to seek federal waivers for Medicaid work requirements for able-bodied adults and expanded behavioral health services. After lengthy questioning and testimony, the committee adopted amendments adding a transitional medical benefits glide path for people who gain employment and later lose Medicaid eligibility, and exempting hospice patients with six months or less to live. Supporters argued the bill would improve accountability, reduce fraud, and save money, while opponents warned it would create administrative burdens, increase paperwork, and cause eligible people to lose coverage or food assistance. The committee ultimately reported the bill favorably as amended.