Video & Transcript Research : 'algorithmic decision making'

Page 16 of 500
AL

Alabama 2025 Regular Session

Alabama House Children and Senior Advocacy Committee Feb 19th, 2025

Children and Senior Advocacy

Transcript Highlights:
  • Okay, wow, you make a break a minute. I was supposed to tell Corley I could make it.
  • I could make it to the Insurance to make a quorum, but I'm not going to make it right now.
  • I am trying to change that in Alabama to make it... ...to change that in Alabama to make it so you have
  • those decisions.
  • And let's not forget the algorithms that... ...and let's not forget the algorithms that are designed
Bills: HB235, HB276, HB285
AZ

Arizona 2026 Regular Session

03/23/2026 - Senate Federalism and Family Law

Federalism and Family Law

Transcript Highlights:
  • Transparency and public participation are core... ...to local decision making.
  • The bill allows a parent with sole legal decision-making authority who is a participant in the ACP to
  • It's just a legal decision making.
  • That loss of medical decision-making? Thank you, Mr. Chairman, and thank you, Senator Diaz.
  • That loss of medical decision-making. Thank you, Mr. Chairman, and thank you, Senator Ortiz.
Summary: The committee first heard HB 2793, which would let cities and towns expedite annexations when 100% of the property owners request it, waive the 30-day waiting period and public hearing in those cases, and allow electronic newspaper notice and a single on-site posting for small single-parcel annexations. Buckeye testified in support, saying the bill would streamline uncontested annexations and reduce delay and cost, while a Tucson-area senator raised concerns that faster annexation can limit public awareness and input. The bill passed 4-3 for a due pass recommendation. HB 2041, which would prohibit a parent, guardian, or custodian from being treated as abusing or neglecting a child solely because poverty prevents them from providing supervision, clothing, food, shelter, or medical care, drew strong support from child welfare and anti-poverty advocates. Opponents argued the bill still leaves room for investigations based on poverty and should more fully remove poverty from the neglect definition. The committee also heard HB 2239, creating a child care grant program and infrastructure fund at DES; witnesses from northern Arizona and child care providers described shortages, workforce challenges, and the need for facilities and support. An amendment adding tax-credit language and opening eligibility to entities seeking to open child care facilities was adopted, and the amended bill passed 6-0 with one not voting. The committee then approved HB 2321, requiring DCS to place a credit freeze on a child’s credit report when the child enters care, by a 7-0 vote. HB 2371, allowing consenting divorcing parties without minor children to use AI-assisted arbitration and adding a separate amendment on therapeutic interventions in parenting cases, prompted questions about whether AI arbitration is currently used and whether the amendment was germane; it passed 4-3. HB 2594, concerning the Address Confidentiality Program in family court and making attempts to obtain protected address information a felony, passed unanimously after testimony from a survivor and advocates. HB 2661, which requires DCS to inform parents under investigation that they may delegate temporary guardianship and seek court relief, passed 4-3 after amendment removed attestation and documentation requirements. Finally, HB 2995, a major domestic-violence custody bill, was heard with extensive testimony from survivors, attorneys, and legal aid advocates. The bill removes the “significant” domestic violence threshold, adds coercive control to the analysis, requires domestic violence to be treated as contrary to the child’s best interests, and mandates detailed court findings; supporters said it addresses cases where abuse was minimized in custody decisions, while members raised concerns about evidentiary standards, implementation, and the risk of false allegations. The committee adopted a 13-page amendment and then gave the amended bill a due pass recommendation by a 4-3 vote.
AZ

Arizona 2026 Regular Session

02/18/2026 - House Judiciary

Judiciary

Transcript Highlights:
  • a dominant factor in legal decision-making and parenting time cases.
  • a domestic violence finding a dominant factor in legal decision-making and parenting time cases.
  • In that sense, it only included legal decision-making.
  • So if you note, this bill makes sure that domestic violence does affect legal decision-making and also
  • HB 2995, strengthens child safety, judicial clarity, and victim protection in determining legal decision-making
Summary: The committee first heard HB 2931, which would continue the Arizona Civil Rights Advisory Board for eight years. Staff and the sponsor described it as a continuation measure to preserve the board’s civil rights reporting and advisory role. One supporter from the Civil Rights Division testified that the board is a volunteer, nonpartisan body that issues reports on civil rights issues, while the division itself protects Arizonans in employment, housing, voting, and public accommodations. The bill passed on a 5-3 vote with a due pass recommendation. Members then considered HB 2862, a strike-everything amendment creating a sentencing enhancement for crimes committed while wearing a mask to conceal identity, narrowed by amendment to Title 13 offenses only. Supporters argued it would deter offenders and help law enforcement, while opponents from CAIR Arizona and the ACLU warned it could burden religious expression and expressive protest, including niqabs, hijabs, motorcycle helmets, and protest costumes. The committee adopted the striker and an additional amendment, then advanced the bill as amended on a 7-2 vote. HB 4042, dealing with paternity actions in the adoption/termination context, would require service of a filed paternity action to prevent waiver of paternal rights and allow failure to do so to support termination of the parent-child relationship. An adoption attorney said the change would close a loophole that can leave children in legal limbo, and the bill passed unanimously. HB 4136 created unlawful entry into a residential structure where a vulnerable adult resides as a felony, but several members and an opponent argued the conduct was already covered by existing trespass, burglary, abuse, and aggravating-factor statutes; the bill nevertheless received a due pass recommendation on a 6-3 vote. The committee also advanced HB 2995, which rewrites child custody/domestic violence standards to make domestic violence a dominant factor in legal decision-making and parenting time, expand the definition to include coercive control, and create a rebuttable presumption against custody for a parent who committed domestic violence. The sponsor and a bereaved mother testified that the bill is intended to better protect children from lethal domestic violence; it passed 8-0 with one member present. Later measures included HB 4070, which would bar certain convicted individuals from serving as nonprofit officers/directors and expand civil liability related to trafficking; supporters called it a prevention tool, while opponents said it was overbroad and could chill nonprofit services, especially for immigrants and DACA recipients. The bill passed 7-2. HB 2861, codifying post-nuptial agreements and setting standards for enforceability, passed 9-0. HB 2800, increasing penalties when someone knowingly lends a vehicle to a restricted DUI driver and a serious injury or death results, passed 9-0 after emotional testimony from the victim’s family and MADD. HB 2495, adding sentencing enhancements for offenses against vulnerable adults and limiting early release, passed 8-0 with one present. HB 2557, requiring health care providers to produce patient medical or payment records within seven business days after a written request, passed 9-0 after discussion about electronic records and timing. Finally, HB 2594, concerning the Address Confidentiality Program, would require family courts to use the participant’s state-issued address, limit access to a child’s records in certain cases, and make illegally obtaining or attempting to obtain a confidential address a class six felony; the sponsor and a participant described repeated attempts by abusers to uncover protected addresses.
HI
Keywords: HI House YouTube, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t8MWmzIjZ64, 2026-07-02T01:23:04+00:00, 2.2.24, Data collected via generic collector engine, House Agenda: https://www.capitol.hawaii.gov/sessions/session2026/hearingnotices/HEARING_FIN_02-27-26_1_.PDF Followed by FIN 2:00 PM Agenda: https://www.capitol.hawaii.gov/Session2026/hearingnotices/HEARING_FIN_02-27-26_2_.PDF Timestamps: 15:02 - Introduction (FIN 10:00AM) 15:51 - HB816, HD1 16:48 - HB1535, HD1 18:22 - HB1537, HD1 29:36 - HB1541, HD2 30:07 - HB1562, HD1 33:35 - HB1574, HD1 39:47 - HB1591, HD1 48:06 - HB1853, HD1 53:25 - HB1854, HD1 54:37 - HB1871, HD1 57:24 - HB1965, HD1 1:06:52 - HB1966, HD1 1:11:38 - HB1969, HD2 1:16:56 - HB1973, HD1 1:24:15 - HB1974, HD1 1:32:11 - HB2315, HD1 1:33:08 - HB2343, HD1 1:34:37 - HB2501, HD1 1:37:54 - HB2505, HD1 1:40:32 - HB1577, HD1 1:43:48 - HB2443, HD1 1:47:44 - HB2498, HD2 1:48:37 - HB2581, HD2 1:55:16 - HB2622, HD1 2:07:04 - Decision Making (FIN 10:00AM) ----- 4:15:54 - Introduction (FIN 2:00PM) 4:15:05 - HB20, HD1 4:18:32 - HB1991, HD1 4:35:37 - HB2614, HD1 4:36:11 - HB276, HD1 4:36:50 - HB916, HD1 4:37:55 - HB1711, HD1 4:38:50 - HB1713, HD1 4:45:48 - HB1715, HD1 4:49:04 - HB1718, HD1 4:50:02 - HB1724, HD1 4:50:53 - HB1725, HD1 5:04:47 - HB1727, HD1 5:06:53 - HB1740, HD1 5:07:29 - HB1756, HD1 5:09:29 - HB1842, HD2 5:14:30 - HB1868, HD1 5:16:50 - HB1920, HD1 5:18:43 - HB2270, HD1 5:19:24 - HB2385, HD2 5:20:36 - HB2444, HD2 5:26:26 - HB2476, HD2 5:40:56 - HB2478, HD1 5:42:59 - HB2515, HD1 5:43:45 - HB2606, HD2 5:48:32 - Decision Making deferred to Monday 3/2/26 10:00AM, 910, house, all, 2.2.42, 2.1.47
MN

Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session

House Commerce Finance and Policy Committee 3/4/26

Commerce Finance and Policy

Transcript Highlights:
  • . decision-making. decision-making.
  • They open up again at 8:00 on Wednesday, and they make a decision from their 10:00 closing price to an
  • make a decision from Wednesday, and they make a decision from their<01:04:20.480> 10:00<01:04
  • It's defined, uh, which is defined as automated decision-making to inform individual prices and wages
  • <01:12:43.760> to defined as automated decision-making to defined as automated decision-making
Bills: HF3794, HF3408
Summary: The committee first approved the minutes from March 3, 2026, and then received a presentation from the Minnesota Office of the Attorney General on the Minnesota Consumer Data Privacy Act. Assistant Attorney General Caitlin Miko and Deputy Attorney General Jessica Whitney reviewed the law’s scope, consumer rights, business obligations, and enforcement history. They said the law took effect July 31, 2025, gives Minnesotans rights to access, delete, and opt out of sale, profiling, and targeted advertising, and is enforced by the Attorney General with penalties up to $7,500 per violation. They reported more than 200 complaints in the first six months, many warning letters, and a shift from education to active enforcement now that the initial warning-letter period has expired. Committee members asked about how the universal opt-out works, what happens when companies deny deletion or editing requests, how the office determines willful noncompliance, and whether the law could burden small businesses. The AG’s office said the opt-out can be set through privacy-protective browsers or extensions, companies must respond to consumer requests within 45 days, small businesses are exempt as defined by the SBA, and investigations look for patterns and evidence of willful conduct rather than minor technical violations. The office also said it needs additional funding to fully staff enforcement efforts and noted that it has already issued subpoenas and civil investigative demands. The committee then took up House File 3408, the Stop Grocery Surveillance Price Gouging Act. The author explained that the bill would prohibit retail grocers, physical and online, from setting individualized prices based on consumer information, would limit certain uses of facial recognition and electronic shelf labels, and would preserve narrow exceptions for discounts and loyalty programs. Public testimony followed from the Minnesota Farmers Union in support, arguing that grocery consolidation and surveillance pricing could worsen already high food costs and harm fair competition. The Minnesota Grocers Association opposed the premise that grocery stores use surveillance pricing, said shelf prices are generally uniform and set from a single storewide database, and argued electronic shelf labels are efficient and not nefarious. A technology company representative similarly said ESLs do not use personal data or facial recognition, prices are uniform, and a 2025 study found no meaningful price increases after ESL adoption. The bill was laid over for possible further discussion after the testimony.
TX
Transcript Highlights:
  • Members in 2015 the legislature pioneered support decision-making agreements called SDMA that allow persons
  • with disabilities who are capable of making their own decisions to receive assistance. assistance from
  • Similarly, the bill would allow persons authorized to enter into a supportive decision-making agreement
  • Obviously, at Disability Rights Texas, we believe supportive decision making has made a huge impact in
  • How do we ensure that a supporter under a supported decision-making agreement in the legal context isn't
KY
Transcript Highlights:
  • Does anyone want to make a motion area.
  • with visit Jess. visit Jessine uh making with visit Jess. visit Jessine uh making an<00:03:20.159
  • <00:04:56.639> a this truly this support makes a this truly this support makes a difference
  • It does make a difference for us and it makes a difference in your all's communities as well.
  • happen to be in the area that also make happen to be in the area that also make that<00:18:18.559
Summary: The committee approved the September minutes and heard two presentations focused on tourism and economic development. First, Visit Jessamine and local winery representatives described Jessamine County’s tourism branding, visitor center renovation at the old jail in Nicholasville, wayfinding signs, kiosks, murals, and the Jessamine Wine and Spirits Trail. They said Kentucky tourism generates more than $1 billion in taxes and $14.3 billion in economic impact statewide, and that Jessamine County tourism generates about $6.2 million in taxes and $87 million in economic impact. They emphasized that the wine trail and related events, including the Kentucky Wine and Vine Festival, draw repeat visitors, support surrounding counties, and attract visitors from across the country and overseas. Committee members praised the presentation and discussed local events such as Halloween activities in Nicholasville and Wilmore and the Great Jessamine Pumpkin event. The committee also received prepared comments on Fort Knox from Lance O’Brien of the Knox Regional Development Alliance after a Fort Knox representative could not attend because of the federal government shutdown. The remarks highlighted Fort Knox’s role as a military installation, economic engine, tourism draw, and workforce partner. The presentation cited an estimated $5.6 billion in annual output, about $1.3 billion in payroll, more than 60,000 retirees and veterans in the surrounding area, and roughly 11,000 to 13,000 soldiers stationed there at a time. It also noted major tourism-related activity such as Cadet Summer Training, the National Raider Challenge, and the George Patton Museum, along with more than $484 million in small-business contracts in fiscal year 2025 and Fort Knox’s role in IT and cybersecurity. Members discussed the importance of tourism revenue, out-of-state visitors, and the broader economic impact of both Jessamine County and Fort Knox.
TX
Transcript Highlights:
  • decision-making never fully replaces human judgment. ...and judgment, where people's lives and liberties
  • AI, like people, can and does often make mistakes.
  • We had to make up for that loss.
  • So they make everybody...
  • I just want to make sure I got you right.
TX
Transcript Highlights:
  • There have been some people that have been replaced, maybe folks that were involved in the decision-making
  • It's your fault, management, for not doing that and not making those small decisions that, if made, wouldn't
  • Any responding employees or staffers making the decision to withhold information must undergo PIA training
  • any interested party to make certain that whatever we come up with makes sense.
  • with any interested party to make certain whatever we come up with makes sense.
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Business and Commerce (Part I) Apr 3rd, 2025

Business & Commerce

Transcript Highlights:
  • with PUC, obviously, to be held accountable to the commitment we're making.
  • assuming there have been some people that have been replaced, maybe folks that were involved in that decision-making
  • It's your fault, management, for not doing that and not making those small decisions, really, that are
  • Attorney ad litem normally appointed; wants to make it mandatory, that's fine.
  • with any interest in the party to make certain whatever we come up with would make sense.
Summary: The Senate Committee on Business and Commerce met with a quorum and first took up several pending and uncontested bills. It favorably reported SB 1405, SB 1762, SB 1977, SB 2077, SB 2148, and SB 1968, and also moved SB 2321 to the local and uncontested calendar. The committee then heard SB 819, which would change how the Public Utility Commission reviews proposed utility-scale solar and related interconnection projects. The committee substitute would shift the default so interconnection is allowed unless the PUC affirmatively prohibits it within 180 days, limit denial to cases where harm substantially outweighs benefits, remove public meeting requirements, retain setback and financial assurance provisions, add optional application materials such as national security and environmental information, and restore local control over county tax abatements. The substitute was adopted and SB 819 was favorably reported to the full Senate on a 7-3 vote. The committee then took up SB 231, focused on CenterPoint’s use of large emergency generators after Hurricane Beryl. Senator King explained that the original bill was intended to prevent customers from being charged for non-mobile generators that were leased at great cost and did not match the bill’s emergency-response purpose. CenterPoint’s Jason Ryan apologized for the company’s communication failures and said the company would make customers whole through a combination of rate reductions, foregone storm-cost recovery, and a donation of the 15 large generators to ERCOT for about two years to address a San Antonio-area reliability issue, with the company absorbing the associated costs. PUC Executive Director Connie Corona said the commission could enforce the agreement through its contested-case process. Public testimony included consumer and reliability advocates, one of whom argued utility-scale microgrids should be preserved as a policy option. SB 231 was left pending. The committee also heard SB 986, which would create an alternative process for routine Public Information Act requests so local governments can make initial redactions without sending every routine exception to the Attorney General, while preserving an appeal path and training requirements. Supporters said it would reduce backlog and speed access to records; opponents argued it would shift the burden to requesters and encourage delay. The AG’s office testified that the process could improve efficiency and still fit within current timelines if used promptly. SB 986 was left pending. Finally, SB 584 was briefly laid out to require consumer reporting agencies that buy data from others to ensure the information complies with Texas law on excluded items such as bankruptcies, judgments, and tax liens, and SB 600 was heard on heir property. SB 600’s substitute would strengthen notice, require an attorney ad litem, add an heir’s bill of rights, allow settlement conferences, and require fair-market-value sales protections; supporters said it would curb predatory partition practices, while opponents warned some provisions could burden or diminish minority heirs’ property rights. SB 584 and SB 600 were left pending after testimony.
AZ

Arizona 2026 Regular Session

02/04/2026 - Senate Judiciary and Elections

Judiciary and Elections

Transcript Highlights:
  • What unpopular decision have you had to make as a leader, the de facto leader since '24?
  • I need you to make a decision.
  • I need you to make a decision. I like that. Madam Chair, for me.
  • I need you to make a decision. we're not playing this game anymore. I need you to make a decision.
  • The Department of Health and Human Services was the entity making the ultimate decision.
Summary: The committee approved the minutes and then took up several election, family court, and criminal justice bills. SB 1425, the “big bill,” would move Arizona’s 2026 primary election date earlier and adjust related election administration timelines; the chair’s amendment moved the primary to July 21 and removed the shortened curing/ID deadlines. County officials testified in support, explaining the timing changes and the need to align dates, and the committee adopted the amendment and gave the bill a do-pass recommendation. SB 1289, dealing with certifications for entities providing money or resources for election administration and foreign funding disclosures, also received a do-pass recommendation after testimony from supporters arguing it would block foreign influence in election administration and ballot issue spending. The committee later heard SCR 1013, a related resolution that would more directly prohibit foreign-source money for election administration and ballot measures; the sponsor and supporters said it was similar to SB 1289 but broader, and testimony focused on foreign money flowing through nonprofit networks. The committee then considered SB 1326, which would allow courts to award attorney fees and costs to victims when a party violates or worsens a victim’s rights. A victim’s attorney testified that the bill would provide needed accountability and guidance, while opponents argued the term “exacerbates” was vague and that existing remedies already exist. The committee approved SB 1326 on a 4-3 vote. SB 1402, requiring courts to impose a fee on certain probationers to cover electronic monitoring costs, drew support from the sponsor and advocates who said offenders should pay for monitoring, and opposition from defense attorneys who warned it could burden indigent probationers and divert money from treatment; it also received a 4-3 do-pass recommendation. The most extensive debate was on SB 1330, which would allow a parent in certain custody cases to request a jury trial on parenting time or legal decision-making. Supporters, including several parents, described costly and traumatic family court experiences and argued a jury would provide a neutral check on judges and court-appointed professionals. County and court representatives opposed the bill, saying family cases require specialized judicial expertise, jury trials would delay urgent matters, increase costs, and risk confidentiality. Despite those concerns, the committee adopted the bill on a 4-3 vote. The committee also approved SB 1328, which declares state policy favoring parental rights and a child’s equal access to both co-parents, after adopting an amendment adding legislative intent language. Finally, SB 1329, which would let parents sue court-appointed professionals who deviate from professional ethics or standards in custody matters, passed 4-3 after testimony from parents and advocates who said court appointees lack accountability, while opponents said existing malpractice and licensing remedies already address misconduct.
AL

Alabama 2026 1st Special Session

Alabama Senate Banking and Insurance Committee Apr 1st, 2026

Banking and Insurance

Transcript Highlights:
  • The total purchase is calculated— The total purchase is calculated— >> I'd like to make a comment at
  • We finally got a thing, but to make a long story short, the engineer in DOT went to that conference and
  • thought<00:05:05.840> a<00:05:06.080> thing,<00:05:06.400> but<00:05:06.560> make
  • ><00:05:06.720> a<00:05:06.760> long<00:05:06.919> story thought a thing, but make
  • a long story thought a thing, but make a long story short,<00:05:07.840> the<00:05:08.040>
Bills: HB545