Video & Transcript Research : 'State Capitol'

Page 16 of 500
WY

Wyoming 2026 Regular Session

House Travel, Recreation, Wildlife & Cultural Resources Committee, February 19, 2026

Travel, Recreation, Wildlife & Cultural Resources

Transcript Highlights:
  • <00:04:22.079> with reminder, too, there are 46 states with reminder, too, there are 46 states
  • wasn't good for the state.
  • wasn't good for the state.
  • wasn't good for the state.
  • Uh Representative Harshman, I state.
Bills: SF0024
MN

Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session

House Human Services Finance and Policy Committee 4/10/25

Human Services Finance and Policy

Transcript Highlights:
  • to grow in our state, we have to find a fair, balanced process.
  • to grow in our state, we have to find a fair, balanced process.
  • to grow in our state, we have to find a fair, balanced process.
  • to grow in our state, we have to find a fair, balanced process.
  • to grow in our state, we have to find a fair, balanced process.
Bills: HF2434
MN

Minnesota 2025 1st Special Session

House Human Services Finance and Policy Committee 4/9/25

Human Services Finance and Policy

Transcript Highlights:
  • throughout the state.
  • throughout the state.
  • throughout the state.
  • throughout the state.
  • throughout the state.
Bills: HF2434
ND

North Dakota 2025-2026 Regular Session

House Industry, Business and Labor Apr 8th, 2025 at 02:45 pm

Industry, Business and Labor

Transcript Highlights:
  • And is it possible for state employees to lose their full health care coverage and working for the state
  • And is it possible for state employees to lose their full health care coverage and working for the state
  • But the state does not contribute to their premiums.
  • The state does not contribute to their premiums.
  • are state employees?
Bills: SB2160
Summary: The committee resumed work on Senate Bill 2160, which would move the Public Employees Retirement System health plan from grandfathered to non-grandfathered status under the Affordable Care Act. PERS officials Rebecca Frickie and Derek Holbein explained that the bill would allow more flexibility in plan design, including higher deductibles, co-pays, and out-of-pocket maximums, while also adding enhanced preventive benefits. They clarified that ACA “essential health benefits” apply to individual and small-group markets, not to PERS as a large employer, and that the bill’s projected cost increases were based on actuarial estimates and prior bid scenarios from Sanford and Blue Cross Blue Shield. Members debated whether the bill would actually save money or simply shift costs to employees. Supporters argued that non-grandfathered status would create more levers to manage medical inflation and could produce net premium savings through plan redesign, citing prior bid comparisons showing potential reductions of 1% to 8% depending on the option. Opponents, including Representative Schauer and North Dakota United president Nick Archelette, questioned how the state would pay for the estimated $25 million to $30 million in added benefits and warned that employees could face higher out-of-pocket costs amid already strained household budgets. Frickie said the legislature would control funding decisions and that current law requiring the state to pay full family premiums could be changed only by statute. The committee also discussed reserve funding, with members noting that a $4.3 million reserve draw in the bill was intended to cover the final months of the biennium and could be modified. After testimony and discussion, Vice Chair Johnson moved a do-pass recommendation and referral to Appropriations. The motion passed 10-3-1, with Representatives Ostlie, Schatz, and Schauer voting no. Representative Gump agreed to carry the bill.
TX
Transcript Highlights:
  • Not sure if y'all know a lot about it, but it was a nuisance to the state of Texas.
  • The state of Texas allows the officers to... ...and gives it to their discretion whether they're going
  • Think about that. ...work and they have to live their lives, and the State of Texas is not getting their
  • There is going to be a law on the books in September stating that you cannot tamper with it.
Bills: HCR10, HCR9
AZ

Arizona 2026 Regular Session

02/17/2026 - Senate Natural Resources

Natural Resources

Transcript Highlights:
  • Arizona is one of these states.
  • Arizona is one of these states.
  • that we have in our state?
  • Ensuring that the State Land Department... ...the State Land Department operates with predictability
  • We've removed them from underneath the state land to have their own state setup board that does several
Summary: The Senate Natural Resources Committee first considered two nominations. Jessica Manuel was introduced as a nominee to the Arizona Game and Fish Commission, where testimony emphasized her science background and experience working with agencies and stakeholders. Members asked about wolf management and her qualifications, and the committee voted 8-0 to recommend her confirmation. Stephen Williams was then introduced for the Arizona Livestock Loss Board, with discussion focused on his livestock and State Land Department experience and how the board handles wolf-related livestock losses. The committee also voted 8-0 to recommend his confirmation. The committee then took up several bills. SB 1785, which would codify ADWR’s one-mile safe-harbor policy for recovery wells near groundwater storage facilities, passed 5-3 after ADWR said it largely reflected current practice but requested clarifying language. SB 1082, requiring sanitation measures and signage for petting zoos and similar animal encounter exhibits, drew strong testimony from a parent advocate describing severe E. coli/HUS cases and opposition from fair/agriculture representatives who argued the bill was too broad and unnecessary; after amendment, it failed 4-4. SB 1336, extending the State Land Department and creating a temporary oversight committee with a broad amendment on lease holdovers, notice periods, and committee membership, passed 6-2 after significant debate over the committee’s composition and scope. Later, SB 1200, which would require ADWR to revisit certain Phoenix AMA assured water supply applications using older groundwater models, passed 5-3 despite opposition from CAP and ADWR over added replenishment obligations and concerns about relying on outdated models. SB 1335, requiring the Arizona Water Banking Authority to post its annual report online, passed 7-1. SB 1559, creating rural groundwater management work groups in each basin to report to ADWR, passed 5-3 after supporters said it would improve basin-level coordination and opponents argued it created new bureaucracy without enforcement tools. SB 1761, appropriating $47.7 million to the University of Arizona for the Yuma Center of Excellence for Desert Agriculture, Cooperative Extension, and the Experiment Station, passed 7-1 amid broad support but some concern about funding levels. Finally, SCM 1007, urging Congress to divest and improve the San Carlos Irrigation Project electric system, passed unanimously.
WY

Wyoming 2026 Regular Session

House Appropriations Committee, February 13, 2026

Appropriations

Transcript Highlights:
  • currently exists in our state? currently exists in our state?
  • of law enforcement here in the state of law enforcement here in the state moving<00:35:58.960>
  • And I just brought state statute?
  • I'd be happy to answer any questions. state. It made a wife a widow, left a state.
  • He added that the west half of the state is looking much better than the eastern half of the state.
WY

Wyoming 2026 Regular Session

Senate Appropriations Committee, February 13, 2026

Appropriations

Transcript Highlights:
  • It does not stop Wyoming law state.
  • act for fear of violating state law. act for fear of violating state law.
  • <00:25:34.720> and It would negatively impact state and It would negatively impact state and
  • with both at the federal and the state with both at the federal and the state level.<00:40:24.240
  • our state realizes as a result of this our state realizes as a result of this investment.<00:51:48.319
NM

New Mexico 2026 Regular Session

House - Consumer and Public Affairs Feb 10th, 2026 at 06:48 pm

House Consumer & Public Affairs

Transcript Highlights:
  • New Mexico's affordable spay and neuter law has created resources across communities, across the state
  • So the lawsuit originated in state court, it was removed to federal court.
  • Now, it's important that that not be misinterpreted or misapplied and stated falsely that there's been
  • And due to federal changes, including in HR1, the federal reconciliation bill, states are prohibited
  • So without state action, ...creating new programs similar to the HDAA.
Bills: HB25, SB38, SB101, HB199
NM

New Mexico 2026 Regular Session

Senate - Conservation Feb 5th, 2026 at 09:09 am

Senate Conservation

Transcript Highlights:
  • We propose that state agencies participate in a no-cost workshop, and that the state agencies disseminate
  • The F.I.R. also states that the name of the study should be changed to State Agency Arthropod... ...study
  • throughout the state.
  • None of those states have a five-year period. None of those states have a related-to provision.
  • , you know, across the state.
Bills: SB154, SB187, SB193, SM3
MN

Minnesota 2025 1st Special Session

House Judiciary Finance and Civil Law Committee 2/27/25

Judiciary Finance and Civil Law

Transcript Highlights:
  • <00:07:27.680> funds may require a recipient of State funds may require a recipient of State
  • use as of public Fund in state use as of public Fund in state government<00:13:32.399> with
  • with you representa leing that our state with you representa leing that our state employees<00:14
  • employees of that office in state employees of that office in state agencies<00:21:03.240> we
  • welcome to the committee please state welcome to the committee please state your<00:51:31.400>
Bills: HF25, HF1, HF428
TX
Transcript Highlights:
  • The Committee on State Affairs will come to order. Will the clerk call the roll?
  • After stakeholders and after that hearing, we're going to actually put kratom back in its natural state
  • After stakeholders and after that hearing, we're going to actually put kratom back in its natural state
  • So kratom in its natural state will be legal under the bill. Additionally, it adds...
  • In its natural state will be legal under the bill.
Summary: The Senate Committee on State Affairs met with a quorum present and considered several pending measures. On Senate Bill 1868, Senator Perry explained a committee substitute that would keep kratom in its natural state legal while continuing to ban 7-OH and other synthetic derivatives, and would also add three synthetic opioids from another bill. The substitute was adopted, and SB 1868 was reported favorably to the full Senate and certified for the local and uncontested calendar. The committee also adopted a committee substitute for Senate Joint Resolution 39, Senator Birdwell’s proposed constitutional amendment related to veto overrides after a regular session, and reported it favorably to the full Senate; members noted a floor amendment would also be offered later. The committee then considered Senate Bill 1184, relating to the age of wine authorized to be sold by a wine collection seller, and reported it favorably to the full Senate. After some procedural discussion and a revote to clarify members’ positions, SB 1184 was also certified for the local and uncontested calendar. Senate Bill 1194 was likewise certified for the local and uncontested calendar without objection, though the transcript does not include its substantive discussion. Senate Bill 1577, relating to the temporary sale of alcoholic beverages at certain racing facilities, was reported favorably to the full Senate and then certified for the local and uncontested calendar. Finally, Senate Concurrent Resolution 42, by Chairman Hughes, was reported favorably to the full Senate on an 8-1 vote. The committee then recessed until called back by the chair.
TX

Texas 89th Regular

State Affairs (Part I) Apr 7th, 2025

State Affairs

Transcript Highlights:
  • Just to wrap up, the state of Texas has thousands of homeless throughout the state.
  • capitol.
  • in the state from which the person moved.
  • , you would send them another state.
  • Second, we oppose 1863 because it allows an unelected state appointee, the Secretary of State, to withhold
Summary: The Senate Committee on State Affairs heard testimony on several bills, with most measures left pending after public testimony closed. SB 801, by Sen. Menéndez, would require DSHS and local clerks to issue birth certificates at no cost to people experiencing homelessness. The author and Maria Benavides of SA Youth said the fee and mailing requirements are major barriers to obtaining ID, housing, and work, and Benavides described clients who were able to secure housing and employment after getting birth records and IDs through her program. The bill was left pending. The committee also heard a set of bills related to the Gulf of Mexico/Gulf of America naming issue: SB 1410 would require state agencies to use “Gulf of Mexico” in official documents, SB 1717 would conform state law to the federal renaming to “Gulf of America,” and SJR 63 would amend the Texas Constitution to match that change. Support testimony for the latter two emphasized alignment with federal action and the use of different geographic names by different countries. All three measures were left pending. Members then heard SB 1200, which would require plaintiffs suing defense contractors to disclose in discovery whether they are receiving litigation funding from adversarial nations such as China, Russia, or Cuba. The author and Texans for Lawsuit Reform said the bill targets third-party litigation funding and foreign influence on lawsuits, especially those affecting defense contractors; the committee substitute narrowed the definition of defense contractor and expanded applicability to actions involving defense contractors’ activities. SB 2626, which requires continuing medical education on pregnancy-related emergencies for OB-GYN physicians and nurses, drew support from witnesses who said it would reduce confusion about Texas abortion law and improve care in emergencies. SB 506, SB 2681, SB 1862, SB 1863, and SB 2216 all focused on elections, including ballot language standards, voter registration challenges, interstate voter-roll cleanup, procedural audits, and election equipment security; testimony split between supporters who said the bills improve transparency and integrity and opponents who warned of vague standards, added costs, and possible voter disenfranchisement. Each of those bills was left pending after testimony.
OK

Oklahoma 2026 Regular Session

Retirement and Government Resources REVISED Feb 17th, 2026 at 10:30 am

Retirement and Government Resources

Transcript Highlights:
  • That's not stating that they. Would be putting in moving them instead of into Oprah.
  • . the state had to take them over because they were pretty well bankrupt.
  • Our firefighters are dealing with all kinds of things that have a state impact and that our state investments
  • And as you stated We're at about 80%. So I think we can do both.
  • It's one of the correspondents I have is on state use.
OK

Oklahoma 2026 Regular Session

Education Feb 10th, 2026 at 10:00 am

Education

Transcript Highlights:
  • I hope you enjoyed the committee and your time at the Capitol.
  • those students to come as an in-state resident tuition.
  • Then just on other states that you're Referencing, you're trying to mock something from another state
  • I do not believe that the state Our state department of Education necessarily needs to hire a new position
  • Senate Bill 1477 is a request from the state regents.
HI

Hawaii 2026 Regular Session

EIG-GVO Public Hearing 02-19-2026

Energy and Intergovernmental Affairs

Transcript Highlights:
  • only state projects. only state projects.
  • State projects only. >> That they would work on state projects only. >> Only. >> State projects only.
  • State projects only. >> That they would work on state projects only. >> Only. >> State projects only.
  • State projects only. >> That they would work on state projects only. >> Only. >> State projects only.
  • State projects only. >> That they would work on state projects only. >> Only. >> State projects only.
Bills: SB2066
Summary: The joint committees on Energy, Intergovernmental Affairs, and Government Operations heard Senate Bill 2066 on county permitting and inspection. Testimony focused on whether the bill should exempt state projects from county permitting requirements. One testifier opposed the measure, arguing it would bypass established permitting processes, weaken good government, and put the public at risk. A DOE representative said the intent was to speed up state projects, but suggested a different approach: funding county positions dedicated solely to state permits, possibly as a pilot program, rather than removing county review entirely. Committee members discussed the difficulty of moving state projects through county systems, the lack of special treatment, and whether a more systematic or standardized process could be created for repetitive projects. After the discussion, the chairs announced a substantive rewrite of SB 2066. The amended version would delete the county-permitting exemptions for state projects and instead create a cooperative working group to address the intersection of state projects and county permitting needs. The revised measure would also include a blank appropriation for counties to fund personnel to expedite permitting for state projects only. Members clarified that any funded staff would be dedicated solely to state projects. The committee then took votes on the revised measure. The committees adopted the amended bill. The Government Operations Committee recommended the Senate draft one version, and members present voted yes, with Senator Awa excused. The measure was adopted with the revised approach and an effective date set for April 19, 2042.
HI
Transcript Highlights:
  • <00:19:19.280> by<00:19:19.440> a state agencies are regulated by a state agencies
  • Please state your name and your presentation.
  • ,<00:29:07.520> county coordinated efforts with state, county coordinated efforts with state
  • <00:38:25.119> Um for the division of state parks. Um for the division of state parks.
  • We're going to permit state counties.
Bills: SB2187
Summary: The joint House Tourism and Water and Land hearing focused on HB 1947, which would repeal the Hawaii Tourism Authority, create an Office of Tourism in DBEDT, and establish a Division of Destination Management in DLNR. The Attorney General opposed provisions allowing the new tourism office or advisory board to hire independent attorneys, and also noted civil service and transfer-of-functions issues, including the need for standard transition language for employees, contracts, records, and equipment. DNR said it stood on its written comments, while the Department of Taxation also stood on its written testimony. HTA opposed the bill, arguing that Act 132 had already improved its governance and that destination management should remain within a single, holistic tourism framework. HTA said it is better positioned to coordinate with counties, communities, and state agencies on both tourism promotion and mitigation of impacts, and pointed to its strategic plan and DMAP work as evidence. The County of Kauai Office of Economic Development also opposed the bill, saying tourism issues cross multiple agencies and that coordination is best handled by one entity rather than splitting responsibilities between DBEDT and DLNR. One member of the public testified in support with reservations, saying Hawaii needs stronger leadership and control, but also warning that dissolving HTA would be a major change. During questioning, committee members pressed HTA on why destination management should not simply be handled by DLNR if HTA already consults with it on land-use and conservation issues. HTA responded that its role is broader than conservation alone and includes balancing economic development, visitor management, and resident quality of life, while deferring to DLNR on matters within DLNR’s jurisdiction. The hearing then moved to decision-making, where the chairs announced amendments that removed the transfer of destination management to DLNR, added counties and state/county agency assistance to the Office of Tourism, and made other conforming changes. The House committees voted to recommend HB 1947 pass with amendments, with several members voting aye and some voting with reservations, and the hearing was adjourned.