Transcript Highlights:

• Members, we're going to move to item B-3, Treasurer of State, Arkansas Financial Education Commission
• Treasurer of State, Arkansas Financial Education Commission.
• chronic pain or in the case of the dental bills to having a special needs diagnosis or developmental disability
• special education teacher, and now my new job is Beacon of Hope, and I help adults with complex disabilities
• and physical disabilities.

Summary: The Administrative Rules Subcommittee of the Arkansas Legislative Council reviewed several agency rules and requests. The Insurance Department’s amendment to its holding company system rule was reviewed and approved, as were two State Board of Election Commissioners rules: one clarifying poll watcher conduct, vote challenges, and provisional voting, and another increasing pay for certified election monitors and defining training, observation, and report-writing compensation. The Arkansas Financial Education Commission also had its rule reviewed and approved after removing membership requirements tied to DEI language to comply with Act 938. The committee held over the Department of Education’s request to be excluded from reporting requirements for one month to allow further discussion about who should write or implement the rules. A major portion of the meeting focused on the Department of Human Services’ request to be excluded from reporting requirements for Acts 567, 568, 967, and 1025. DHS said CMS had raised comparability and other federal approval concerns, especially for the dental and diagnostic lab provisions, and that it might not be able to meet the acts’ effective dates. DHS described several possible paths forward, including broader benefit changes, waivers, or splitting the dental provisions so the pediatric rate increase could move separately from the special-needs adult cap increase. The Arkansas State Dental Association disputed DHS’s conclusion that the acts could not be implemented as written, argued that Act 1025 is workable, and urged DHS to continue pursuing implementation and preserve the September 1 effective date where possible. Public testimony also supported expanded dental access for adults with disabilities and special needs. After discussion, the committee voted not to exclude DHS from reporting requirements for those acts. The committee then reviewed the Division of Higher Education’s Act 781 report. The division said it has 32 rules in effect, asked to repeal three rules—two replaced by new rules and one no longer supported by authority or current law—and to continue the remaining 29 rules. The committee approved that request, with the repeals effective upon adjournment of the Legislative Council meeting on January 16, 2026. The meeting concluded with no questions on the remaining written rulemaking updates from prior and current sessions, which were filed without further action.

Transcript Highlights:

• Thomas Gleason, Chairman, Public Utility Commission of Texas. Connie Corona, Executive Director.
• In the interim, after the wildfires, the Railroad Commission and the PC entered into an MOU.
• At this time, has the Railroad Commission asked the PUC to ask a utility to sever power anywhere?
• from the Railroad Commission, although I will caveat that that's only if they're not able to resolve
• That's the Public Utility Commission keeps that list.

Keywords: 1184, house, all

Transcript Highlights:

• I appear as co-chair of Arlington's Commission for Arts and Culture, an umbrella organization managing
• And the legislature commissioned the editor of the Worcester Telegram & Gazette, his name was John Milton
• And the legislature commissioned the editor of the Worcester Telegram Gazette, his name was John Milton
• As a dancer, as a as a disabled dancer, as a diverse leader in this space, I think it is important to
• is even harder for us to find spaces to perform, which impacts our ability to employ and have a disabled

Keywords: 995, all

Summary: The Joint Committee on Tourism, Arts, and Cultural Development held a hearing on October 21, opening with a moment of silence for former committee chair Senator Edward Kennedy. Chairs Senator Paul Mark and Representative Sean Garballey then heard testimony on several bills related to tourism funding, arts infrastructure, public art, Native heritage, and a choreographer laureate. A major focus was legislation to require earlier distribution of regional tourism council grants from the Tourism Trust Fund, with testimony from regional tourism leaders from North of Boston, Metro West, Cape Cod, and Senator Joan Lovely. Witnesses said delayed grant allocations make it difficult to plan fall, winter, and shoulder-season marketing, and they argued that an October 1 or September 1 deadline would help preserve tourism’s economic impact without increasing appropriations. They cited tourism’s role in jobs, tax revenue, and regional economic development, especially for smaller and less prominent tourism regions. The committee also heard strong support for the Creative Space Act and the PLACE Act, which would help municipalities preserve affordable creative workspace and create a public art funding mechanism tied to state construction projects. Testimony from MassCreative, MAPC, arts organizations, muralists, and local arts leaders emphasized loss of workspace, displacement of artists, and the economic and community benefits of public art. Additional testimony supported bills to protect Native American heritage by preventing the sale of funerary and sacred objects in public or nonprofit collections, and a bill to establish a first-in-the-nation choreographer laureate of the Commonwealth. No votes were taken during the hearing, and the committee adjourned after public testimony concluded.

Transcript Highlights:

• services at the Department of Economic Security and Department of Public Safety, and developmentally disabled
• Developmentally disabled, this budget does not touch the DDD program at all because it's formula-based
• It continues allowing monies appropriated to the Navigable Stream Adjudication Commission from the Water
• Representative Livingston, and Representative, I think the Arizona Navigable Stream Adjudication Commission
• is a one-line-item commission whose primary responsibility is verifying whether or not a stream or river

Keywords: 1182, all

Transcript Highlights:

• I will go ahead and call this October 21st meeting of the Citizens Commission for Performance Measurement
• This is a roll call for the attendance at the October 22nd, 2025 Citizen Commission meeting.
• Our first item of business is commission business, and on that, we need approval of the September 22nd
• This is a roll call vote to approve the September 22nd, 2025 Citizen Commission meeting minutes.
• Seeing nothing else, the next Citizens Commission meeting will take place on May 6, 2026, at 10 a.m.

Summary: The Citizens Commission for Performance Measurement of Tax Preferences met on October 22, 2025. Members approved the September 22, 2025 meeting minutes unanimously and reviewed a draft 2026 meeting schedule, tentatively setting meetings for May 6, August 4, September 15, and October 20, 2026, without taking a formal vote. The commission then worked through its commissioner comments on tax preference reviews, with Commissioner Forsyth recusing himself from the natural gas for transportation and energy sales to silicon smelters items. The discussion focused on reconciling endorse/endorse with comment/does not endorse positions into final recommendations. The commission adopted comments for the liquefied natural gas preference, the natural gas for transportation preference, the energy sales to silicon smelters preference, several low-income housing and veterans-related preferences, and other reviewed tax preferences. Several comments emphasized reporting burdens, the need for clearer legislative guidance, and in the veterans’ item, the possibility that low use may reflect limited visibility of the preference. Staff also clarified the reporting requirements for the natural gas transportation preference and the rationale for continuing the LNG preference while asking the legislature to consider a Department of Revenue workgroup report. All commissioner comment packages were ultimately adopted by roll call votes, with the relevant recusals noted. No members of the public testified in person. The chair invited written testimony by email or mail and thanked staff and members for their work. The next commission meeting was announced for May 6, 2026, at 10 a.m.

Transcript Highlights:

• electrification, establishing the virtual power plant program, authorizing the Public Regulation Commission
• Relating to firearms, making an exemption to unlawful possession of a firearm at a polling place for commissioned
• House Bill 120, introduced by Representative Cates, an act relating to disabilities, enacting the Accessibility
• redistricting, enacting the County Redistricting Act, requiring counties to create a county districting commission
• Districting commission, establishing requirements for creating county district plans and public participation

Transcript Highlights:

• Next up is SB 2002 relating to water, allows the Commission of Water Resource Management to retain independent
• Next up is SB 2002 relating to water, allowing the Commission of Water Resource Management to retain
• Recommendation is to pass with amendments adopting the proposed amendment from the Disability and Education
• Next item, Senate Bill 2816. amendment from the Disability and amendment from the Disability and Education

Keywords: 912, senate, all

Summary: The committees met in decision-making sessions and considered a long list of Senate bills, with no oral testimony taken. Several measures were advanced unamended, including SB 2178 on industrial hemp, SB 2277 on hospital price transparency, SB 2387 on digital financial asset transaction kiosks, SB 2688 on compassionate release, SB 3132 on syndromic surveillance data reporting, SB 3219 on housing infrastructure growth bonds, and others. Many bills were also advanced with technical or substantive amendments, including SB 2114 on collective bargaining grievance rights, SB 2601 on procurement penalties, SB 2698 on cruise ships/transportation, SB 2757 on digital asset charters, SB 2948 on insurance fraud, SB 2002 on water governance, SB 2022 on state water code penalties, SB 2190 on inclusionary zoning, SB 3294 on wrongful imprisonment compensation, and SB 17, SB 2407, SB 2811, SB 2907, SB 2930, SB 3084, SB 3103, and SB 2808 in the later agenda segment. The committee also discussed SB 2080, relating to the psychology interjurisdictional compact, where one senator objected to interstate compacts as opening local jobs to out-of-state professionals; despite that objection, the measure was adopted. SB 3133 on preventive medicine drew amendment discussion to remove unnecessary language about committee members not being state employees and to delete an immunity subsection, while preserving ethics-code coverage and provider immunity. SB 3000 on insurance was amended to remove a savings clause, and SB 2921 on fund transfers received extensive amendments removing or revising numerous special funds and revolving accounts across agencies. Most votes were unanimous or near-unanimous, often with members present voting aye or with reservations. A few measures drew recorded no votes or reservations, including SB 2080, SB 3133, SB 2921, and SB 2401, where one member voted with reservations and the committee report was to reflect the Attorney General’s comments. In each case, the committee adopted the recommendation and moved the bills forward.

Transcript Highlights:

• as robustly as we are, which leads to the next one: do you want to come present at the Education Commission
• I'm the vice chair of the Education Commission of the States this year, so I've got a little pool that
• linguistically responsive experts, teachers from different state regions, and a Special Education Disability
• So regarding the broader criteria for culturally and special education and disabilities versus now allowing
• To the cultural language that was there before regarding special education and disabilities and culturally

Keywords: 996, all

Transcript Highlights:

• Probably the two $25,000 homestead exemptions, but potentially more exemptions if you're a disabled veteran
• pay for their property taxes because they are a veteran, but they missed the timeline to request disabilities
• They didn't realize that they owe taxes, et cetera, et cetera... ...to request disabilities.
• You know, I don’t think you guys talk to your county commissions and city councils.
• You guys talk to your county commissions and city councils, I don’t think they’re sitting on a boatload

Summary: The Select Committee on Property Taxes held its first meeting with opening remarks from the co-chairs and ranking member framing the committee’s task as developing property tax legislation for next session. Staff then gave a high-level overview of Florida property taxes, explaining how ad valorem taxes work, the roles of property appraisers, tax collectors, taxing authorities, value adjustment boards, and the Department of Revenue, and reviewing key concepts such as just value, assessed value, exemptions, taxable value, millage rates, homestead exemptions, Save Our Homes, and portability. The presentation also emphasized that property tax law is largely rooted in the Florida Constitution and that local governments choose millage rates, which affects collections. No public comment was taken. The committee then discussed five Speaker-proposed concepts. Proposal 1 would require cities, counties, and special districts to hold a referendum on eliminating property taxes on homestead properties; members raised concerns about local funding, public safety, special districts, renters, and the need for extensive voter education, with some suggesting countywide elections or town halls instead. Proposal 2 would create a new $500,000 homestead exemption for non-school taxes and a $1 million exemption for seniors 65+ or long-term homesteaders; members split between seeing it as meaningful relief for seniors and warning it could devastate local tax bases, especially in lower-value or rural counties, while also potentially trapping older homeowners in place. Proposal 3 would authorize the Legislature to raise homestead exemptions by general law; some liked the flexibility, but others worried about statewide one-size-fits-all impacts, political difficulty in reversing changes, and the need for local revenue replacement. Proposal 4 would change assessment caps for homestead and non-homestead property; several members said it would not provide enough relief and could shift burdens to rental properties and non-homestead owners. Proposal 5, eliminating foreclosure on homestead property for tax liens, drew the strongest opposition, with members saying it would undermine lien priority, mortgage and title systems, and incentives to pay taxes. Throughout the meeting, members repeatedly stressed the need to understand local fiscal impacts, including police, fire, infrastructure, and other services funded by property taxes, and to consider alternative revenue sources or offsets if taxes are reduced. The co-chairs said the committee is still in the information-gathering stage, that all ideas remain on the table, and that members should do “homework” by meeting with local taxing authorities and learning how property taxes are set and spent in their districts. The meeting ended with no votes on the proposals and adjournment after a motion to rise.

Transcript Highlights:

• IF YOU SHOULD WEAVE YOUR SPIGOT ON YOUR COMMISSION WILL BE INCLUDED IN THE MEETING RECORDS.
• SB 1202 AIMS TO ENHANCE BENEFITS OR FIREFIGHTERS WERE TOTALLY DISABLED DURING OFFICIAL TRAINING EXERCISES
• A KEY PROVISION WOULD BE ELIGIBILITY FOR INSURANCE COVERAGE WHERE THEY BECOME DISABLED AS A RESULT OF
• APPLICANT BASED ON RACE, COLOR, RELIGION, SEX INCLUDING SEXUAL ORIENTATION, NATIONAL ORIGIN, AGE, DISABILITY
• AMENDMENT. >> THE DELETE ALL BASICALLY WHAT IT DID WAS WE WANTED TO SEPARATE THE DUTIES OF THE HISTORIC COMMISSION

Keywords: 999, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• bogus commissions or just giving commissions to anybody.
• When I took office in 2021, I revoked that commission, and I revoked all commissions.
• It's a commission; it's a commission; it's a commission. House Bill 1038 does not change that.
• It's a commission, it's a commission, as a commission.
• It's a commission, it's a commission, is a commission. House Bill 1038 does not change that.

Keywords: 974, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• , with intellectual disabilities, with intellectual disabilities, otherwise<00:30:47.279> known
• the part of the House to the Commission the part of the House to the Commission to<02:15:53.520>
• The commission is first priority.
• <04:27:07.120> is At the same time, the commission is At the same time, the commission is
• Safe and Beautiful Commission.

Keywords: U.S. House of Representatives Floor Proceedings on Wednesday, March 25, 2026, 1012, house, all

Transcript Highlights:

• And I think I... ...disabilities, maternal health, menopausal support, and so much more.
• So paid pregnancy disability leave for educators, a major, major milestone in California for 14 weeks
• So paid pregnancy disability leave for educators, a major, major milestone in California for 14 weeks
• The asset test limit alone would have threatened coverage for seniors and people with disabilities at
• There is a significant investment for increased funding to support our students with disabilities and

Summary: The Assembly Budget Committee met to consider the 2026 Budget Act, which leaders said was the negotiated compromise with the Senate and was expected to move to the floor that evening. Opening remarks emphasized that the plan balances the budget over two years, reduces the structural deficit, and builds reserves, while also protecting core services in the face of federal cuts. Jason Sisney outlined the legislative budget framework and the likely floor bills, including AB 109, SB 110, SB 122, and SB 125. Department of Finance representative Eric Khali said the administration appreciated the two-year balanced approach and supported the modification in SB 122, while noting the package uses additional revenues and new spending to soften or reject some proposed cuts. Most of the discussion focused on major spending areas. Members and subcommittee chairs highlighted protections and additions for health care and human services, including rejecting the proposed Medi-Cal asset limit change, delaying premium increases, restoring clinic and dental funding, supporting distressed hospitals and county indigent care, and expanding county eligibility staffing to handle H.R. 1-related workload. Education members described record or expanded support for TK-12 schools, child care, special education, community colleges, teacher recruitment, and higher education, including a change to extend Cal Grant eligibility to age 30 for some community college students. Housing and homelessness funding was increased for HAP, multifamily housing, and the low-income housing tax credit, while public safety members pointed to investments in victims’ services, restorative justice, and prison closure savings. Several members also raised concerns or priorities tied to the budget deal. Some praised the package as a moral document that protects vulnerable Californians, immigrant communities, LGBTQ residents, seniors, and people with disabilities. Others noted unresolved issues, including the MCO tax’s impact on districts, the need for more support for local journalism, arts, biotech R&D incentives, transit and GGRF-related concerns, and the need for continued work on Prop. 98 and long-term fiscal resilience. The vice chair cautioned that despite the current progress, the state remains vulnerable to revenue volatility and warned that the budget should build more resilience against a possible downturn. No formal vote was taken in the portion provided, but the committee was preparing the budget package for floor action and final negotiations.

Transcript Highlights:

• I had some work on the API Commission, the State Commission.
• accommodations for their disabilities.
• Approximately 11% of UC students receive accommodations for their disabilities.
• The population of students with disabilities registered with the UC Disability Support Service Centers
• recommendations to address specific ways the university could support students with disabilities.

Keywords: 988, house, all

Transcript Highlights:

• The most eligible student groups are students with disabilities, students experiencing homelessness,
• I had some work on the API Commission, the State Commission.
• accommodations for their disability.
• The population of students with disabilities registered with the UC Disability Support Service Centers
• recommendations to address specific ways the university could support students with disabilities.

Summary: The committee heard testimony on three education budget items: the Expanded Learning Opportunities Program (ELOP), differentiated assistance/statewide system of support, and universal school meals plus kitchen infrastructure grants. For ELOP, the Department of Finance described the Governor’s proposal to provide $4.7 billion ongoing Proposition 98 funding and $62.4 million to set a minimum Tier 2 rate of $1,800 per pupil. The LAO recommended instead fixing the Tier 2 rate at $1,579, and committee members questioned how the rate was determined, how much funding is actually spent, and whether overlapping funding from ELOP, ACEs, and 21st Century programs is being tracked. CDE said ELOP is showing positive attendance and math outcomes, but some requested data will not be available until mid-2027; members also raised concerns about double-funding, transparency, and whether middle and high school students are being equitably served. On differentiated assistance, CCEE outlined the statewide system of support and the various tiers of universal, targeted, supplemental, and intensive assistance. Finance explained the Governor’s proposal to replace the current DA structure with a more stable universal and targeted assistance model, funded at $131.9 million ongoing, with a three-year support cycle aligned to LCAP and ESSA timelines and broader State Board authority to revise eligibility criteria. The LAO objected to considering the proposal before the State Board finalizes the new performance criteria, and committee members expressed concern that moving to a three-year cycle could delay support for LEAs that newly fall into need mid-cycle. There was also discussion about whether the proposal would weaken subgroup-based equity guardrails or give the State Board too much discretion over who qualifies for support. For school meals and kitchen infrastructure, Finance proposed $1.8 billion ongoing for universal meals and an additional $100 million ongoing plus $100 million one-time for a fourth round of kitchen infrastructure and training grants. The LAO recommended rejecting the new kitchen grant round because prior rounds are still being spent and the unmet need is not yet clear. CDE said prior investments have improved meal participation, efficiency, and menu variety, but many schools still lack the facilities for scratch cooking and face construction, electrical, and procurement barriers. Members asked for more data on how prior grants were used, which schools are benefiting, and whether funds could also support lower-cost food access strategies such as pantries, while noting federal restrictions on some meal-service innovations.

Transcript Highlights:

• I've had people say, like the lady with the disability yesterday, that she couldn't attend the hearing
• We deserve maps drawn fairly by an independent citizen commission that reflect our communities, like
• I am a veteran, a disabled veteran, and I am a resident of El Paso, Texas.
• I am a retired and disabled veteran who lives in El Paso, Texas.
• Chairman, members of the commission, thank you so much for your time. I'll be brief.

Keywords: 1185, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• Uh, the EPIC Commission, as pointed out in the title, is a commission we put together last year that
• Uh, the EPIC Commission, as pointed out in the title, is a commission we put together last year that
• <01:01:45.800> to Planning and Inventory Commission to Planning and Inventory Commission to
• Uh the EPIC Commission Commission Commission as<01:02:29.360> pointed<01:02:29.720> out
• and the Legislative Research Commission and the Legislative Research Commission would<01:15:39.640

Keywords: 958, all

Summary: The House convened with 98 members present, declared a quorum, approved the prior journal, and received Senate concurrence requests on Senate Bills 263, 281, and 324. The chamber then moved through second readings and committee reports on a range of measures, including education, agriculture, banking and insurance, judiciary, licensing, and task force resolutions. Among the reported bills were measures on KEES scholarships for non-certified schools, a residential safe room rebate program, dual credit scholarships, impeding a first responder, motor vehicles, tallow-based cosmetic products, animal health emergencies, mortgage loan income limits, deferred deposit fees, child protection, Attorney General operations, corrections operations, school leadership, school transportation, advanced mathematics coursework, and task forces on charitable gaming and early childhood education governance. The House passed House Bill 642, a Teachers' Retirement System housekeeping bill, after adopting House Committee Substitute 1. The sponsor said the bill updates survivor benefit documentation, raises the daily earnings limit for retired members returning to work from $170 to $200, removes an unused early-return provision, reinstates a pension waiver program, clarifies benefit tier calculations using an earlier participation date in another state system, and allows a parent member to manage payments for a disabled child without a court order. Members asked about substitute teaching limits, retirement penalties, budget impact, and a removed provision involving index funds; the sponsor said he would follow up on the day limits and stated he did not believe the bill would add to unfunded liability. The bill passed 96-0. The House also passed House Bill 780 on recording commissioner’s deeds, after adopting a floor amendment that removed fines and penalties. The bill allows a city to petition circuit court if a deed is not recorded within 30 business days, and the court may compel filing and award costs and attorney’s fees. Members discussed whether the bill effectively created a lawsuit-based enforcement mechanism rather than a fine, and supporters said it would help local governments identify responsible property owners and address code enforcement and public safety issues. The bill passed 96-0. House Bill 541, concerning peace officers, also passed after a committee substitute; the sponsor said it cleans up Kentucky Law Enforcement Council procedures, strengthens certification standards, clarifies revocation language, and reflects input from law enforcement groups. It passed 95-0. House Bill 195, the Kentucky Urban Youth Agriculture Initiative, passed after a committee substitute and floor amendment. The substitute added Kentucky State University Cooperative Extension alongside UK Cooperative Extension, and the floor amendment changed the pilot’s implementation date to January 1, 2027 and adjusted the program’s term timing. Supporters said the bill would expand urban agriculture education, connect youth to food systems and career pathways, and help students in urban counties learn practical agricultural skills; it passed 97-0. The House then took up House Bill 794 on financial exploitation, which expands protections to all adults age 65 and older, adds felony penalties for knowingly, wantonly, or recklessly exploiting those adults, allows the attorney general to seek extradition from another state, and requires investment advisers to complete three hours of continuing education on financial exploitation. Members cited real-world scam experiences and urged stronger penalties, but the bill passed 96-0.

Transcript Highlights:

• In 2019, the legislature passed a law and it created a Section 35 commission.
• I've had children that have been under treatment, and I'm now the executive director of the Disability
• And I'm now the executive director of the Disability Law Center.
• We receive a lot of calls from people, as does CPCS at the Disability Laws. a lot of calls from people
• I was on the White House Commission for Mental Health.

Keywords: 995, all

Summary: The committee held its fourth public hearing of the 2025-2026 session on bills dealing with involuntary commitment and access to addiction treatment, especially proposals to move Section 35 civil commitments away from jails and prisons and into facilities licensed or approved by DPH or DMH. Chairs Velis and Domb framed the hearing as a discussion of how to support people in crisis with compassion, while also warning against using involuntary commitment as a way to remove unhoused people from public view. The hearing also touched on related concerns about discharge practices, treatment capacity, and the need for a broader continuum of care. Testimony split largely along two themes. Addiction researcher Keith Humphreys argued that many people enter treatment under pressure, that involuntary treatment can be ethically justified in the face of overdose risk, but that it should not be mandated unless high-quality services exist first; he emphasized the need for inpatient care when someone is a grave danger, followed by case management and outpatient support. MAMH’s Kate Alicante supported the bill, saying Massachusetts is the only state that commits people with substance use conditions to jails or prisons and that carceral settings add trauma and stigma; she pointed to prior legislative steps, including the Section 35 commission and the planned closure of DOC’s MESAC facility, as evidence that the Commonwealth is moving toward health-based settings. A major portion of the hearing focused on Stony Brook, a sheriff-run stabilization and treatment center in Hampden County. Boston City Councilor John Fitzgerald, several committee members, and multiple people in recovery described the facility as humane, well-run, and effective, with longer stays, medical monitoring, medication-assisted treatment, counseling, and warm handoffs to aftercare. Several witnesses said Stony Brook saved their lives or helped family members recover, and they argued that the sheriff’s office model should be expanded rather than eliminated. Others, including family members and advocates, countered that even a well-run correctional setting remains stigmatizing and that people should not be treated in facilities run by sheriffs or corrections when they have committed no crime. No vote was taken. The hearing concluded with continued testimony, including Senator Friedman’s support for Section 35 as a civil commitment tool but not in a criminal justice setting, and her separate support for a bill to speed inpatient mental health treatment.

Transcript Highlights:

• That's why the legislature commissioned a report on how to improve the funding determination process
• I'm a charter school parent to special needs and learning disabled children and I strongly opposed AB
• First of all in your bill if a family has a child with disabilities that is on an IEP or a 504 and they
• The ELA requires the commission on teacher credentialing to update administrator preparation standards
• As you know, I've spent much of my professional life serving students with disabilities as a special

Keywords: 988, house, all

Transcript Highlights:

• with disabilities.
• staff with disabilities representatives staff with disabilities representatives from<00:45:56.079
• possible if you look at like disability possible if you look at like disability is<00:46:24.680>
• <00:47:50.119> are<00:47:50.359> federal disability are federal disability are federal
• or a higher a harder to disability or a higher a harder to diagnose<02:28:03.960> disability<

Keywords: 928, house, all

Summary: The committee opened with the Pledge of Allegiance and noted weather-related absences and a large number of new bills. The chair said a subcommittee would be formed to review three cell phone bills, and a full committee work session on bullying would be scheduled for the week after next. The committee then began a hearing on House Bill 121, which would create local special education advisory councils in school districts. Representative Glenn Cordelli, the sponsor, said the councils would be parent-driven, with parents of children with disabilities advising districts on education, safety, program development, evaluation, planning, policies, and communication with administrators. He said the bill would require at least quarterly meetings with district administration, an annual parent workshop, and a year-end report to the school board. He also cited federal guidance from the U.S. Department of Education on parent advisory councils and said the goal was to improve collaboration between parents and schools. Members raised questions about the use of “shall,” how councils would be formed in districts without PTAs/PTOs, whether the councils could function in very small districts, privacy concerns about parents disclosing their children’s disabilities, whether the councils should include guardians or educational professionals, and whether the councils would have any direct tie to the state advisory council. The sponsor said the requirement was intended to make the councils mandatory, that local districts could organize them organically if needed, that participation would be voluntary, that parents would not be required to disclose private information, and that the councils would remain advisory rather than determinative. He also said costs should be minimal. Testimony then began from Nicole Sheath, a pediatric occupational therapist and parent of four children with disabilities, who described her experience balancing advocacy, school collaboration, and the demands of her children’s therapies and education.