Transcript Highlights:

• There just should be something else that they have to demonstrate.
• There just should be something else that they have to demonstrate.
• There just should be something else that they have to demonstrate.
• There just should be something else that they have to demonstrate.
• Unsafe practices, unsafe to demonstrate.

Keywords: Ports and Marine Resources - Room 216, 30 January, 2026; 11:00 AM, 925, all

Transcript Highlights:

• As a member of the Appropriations Committee, I'm always excited to support what's going on.
• And I think that's contributing to how the state has funded and supported these sites and what we do.
• data that's in our websites, and again, it's sort of a model for what a pooled program wants to demonstrate
• One of the things the rating agencies focus on is management, and I think the NMFA has demonstrated.
• demonstrated over the years that the management is solid, and that's also reflected in the lack of loan

Transcript Highlights:

• And then finally is support groups.
• It doesn't matter what type of support unit this was, if it was an elementary or a secondary support
• An elementary or a secondary support unit within a district, a support unit amount is the same.
• unit will generate more support units per student than a general support unit formula does.
• Statewide, on average, an exceptional education support unit generates about 40% more support units per

Summary: The committee first approved the minutes from February 2 and 3. It then introduced RS 3-1308, sponsored by Representative Raymond, which would change public school digital content and curriculum funding from a first-come, first-served process to an as-needed, scored application process so districts with greater need would receive funds. The motion to introduce passed without opposition. The committee next heard a presentation from the Office of Performance Evaluations on its K-12 district characteristics and funding study. Casey Petty explained that Idaho’s support unit funding model tends to provide more state funding per student to smaller districts and less per student to larger districts, but that funding does not consistently rise with higher proportions of high-need students such as special education or English learner populations. He said Idaho’s special education formula assumes only about 5.8% of students are in special education, while actual enrollment was about 11.5% in 2023, contributing to an estimated $37.7 million gap in support-unit funding for special education. Members asked about the support unit model, district size effects, charter school data limitations, Medicaid, and whether the formula should be revised. The committee then considered House Joint Memorial 11, which urges Congress to fully fund the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act at the promised 40% level. Representative Furman and several educators and administrators testified in support, describing the strain on district budgets and citing large local shortfalls in Boise and Fruitland. Witnesses said districts are covering mandated special education services with local and state funds, and that increased identification, early intervention, and behavioral needs are driving costs. Some members raised questions about over-identification, eligibility criteria, and behavioral issues, but the memorial was ultimately sent to the floor with a due pass recommendation by voice vote. The meeting then adjourned.

Transcript Highlights:

• way that I supported Senator Grall's.
• In order for them to demonstrate, it seems reasonable for them to demonstrate...
• I cannot support this.
• With that, I ask for your favorable support.
• I ask for your favorable support.

Keywords: 999, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• Do we have additional witnesses in support? Do we have additional witnesses in support?
• Seeing no other witnesses in support, do we have any main witnesses in opposition? in support?
• Do we have additional witnesses in support? Thank you. Witnesses in support.
• And so we urge your support for this bill. Do we have additional witnesses in support?
• We'd like to ask for your support. Thank you. Do we have additional witnesses in support?

Keywords: 988, house, all

Transcript Highlights:

• Here to speak in support of House Bill 2986.
• I stand in support of H.C.M. 2009.
• Trussell, we always do support our miners.
• Hope for your support. Madam Chair, Mr.
• We stand in support of this bill, essentially based on fairness.

Bills: HB2026, HB2027, HB2028, HB2031, HB2078, HB2094, HB2095, HB2101, HB2102, HB2103, HB2260, HB2278, HB2827, HB2932, HB2933, HB2934, HB2986, HCM2009, HCR2038

Keywords: assured water supply, groundwater, commingling, commingled water, water supply, Arizona Department of Water Resources, ADWR, active management area, AMA, subdivision plat, development approval, water rights, municipal provider, private water company, certificate of assured water supply, written commitment of water service, groundwater savings credits, gray water reuse, replenishment district, Central Arizona Project

Transcript Highlights:

• this bill, and I support the governor's veto.
• this bill, and I support the governor's veto.
• Uh, I rise in support of the governor's veto.
• </c> agencies, and other stateup supported agencies, and other stateup supported activities.<00:56:58.160
• We all want support our dentist.

Bills: SB141, SB124, SB56, SJR116, SB94, SB37, SB127, SB197, SB66, SB70, SB133, SB160, SB214, SB312, SB52, SJR62, SJR75

Keywords: legal advertisements, tax rates, public hearings, transparency, local government, sick leave, education, teacher retirement, benefits, employee compensation, Medicaid, nonopioid analgesics, pain management, health care regulation, utilization controls, physician shortage, health care access, medically underserved areas, medical education, workforce development

Transcript Highlights:

• . support. support.
• the support, Mr.
• the support, Mr.
• I'd ask for members support. support. support.
• ><c> support</c><02:43:05.439><c> your</c> support this bill and support your support this bill and support

Keywords: 1187, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• Do we have additional witnesses in support? Do we have additional witnesses in support?
• Do we have additional witnesses in support?
• And so we urge your support for this bill. Do we have additional witnesses in support?
• Mitch Steiger with CFT, also in support.
• We'd like to ask for your support. Thank you. Do we have additional witnesses in support?

Summary: The Assembly Labor and Employment Committee heard several bills focused on worker protections, AI in the workplace, bereavement leave, and construction labor standards. SB 909 by Senator Smallwood-Cuevas would increase public works contractor registration fees, raise prevailing wage and related penalties, and direct half of collected penalties back into the Public Works Enforcement Fund. Supporters said the bill would help combat wage theft and misclassification and strengthen enforcement; opponents argued the higher fees and penalties would burden contractors without fixing enforcement backlogs. The committee voted the bill out on a due pass motion to Appropriations. The committee also approved SB 951 by Senator Reyes, which would require 60-day notice when 25 or more workers are displaced by technology and require reporting on AI-related job impacts. Supporters framed it as a response to rapid AI-driven layoffs and a way to gather real-time data; opponents raised concerns about small employers, proprietary information, and litigation. SB 947 by Senator McNerney, the “No Robo Bosses Act,” would require human review of automated discipline, termination, or deactivation decisions and restrict predictive behavior analysis. Supporters said it would prevent biased or mistaken automated decisions; opponents objected to the inclusion of independent contractors, private rights of action, and other provisions. Both bills were advanced to the Committee on Privacy and Consumer Protection. The committee also passed SB 1149 by Senator Durazo, which would expand bereavement leave to cover a “designated person,” including chosen family relationships. Supporters, including AARP and a witness who described losing a long-term partner, said the bill reflects modern family structures; there was no opposition. In addition, SB 1185 by Senator Cortese, applying skilled and trained workforce standards to pharmaceutical facility construction, was approved despite opposition from business and construction groups who said there was no demonstrated safety problem and that the mandate could raise costs and reduce competition. Several other bills on the consent calendar were also approved, and all measures were reported out of committee.

Transcript Highlights:

• And I hope that we'll continue to support events, and it's up to us and I hope that we'll continue to
• support events like Juneteenth and we need to become more as one.
• Today I rise in strong support of ACR 124.
• And with that, I ask for your support on ACR 214. Thank you, Assembly Member Cork Silva.
• This bill has had zero no votes and has had bipartisan support.

Summary: The Assembly convened after a quorum call, opened with prayer and the Pledge of Allegiance, approved procedural motions, and recognized several guests and honorees, including CAUSE leadership academy participants, retiring FCMAT CEO Michael Fine, a Capitol intern, environmental leaders celebrating Black Conservation Week, family members of members, and NASA astronaut Captain Victor Glover Jr. The body also took up a number of routine file items and committee referral requests, with several bills referred to committees by unanimous consent and multiple items passed or retained on file. The main floor debate centered on ACR 214, the Juneteenth resolution. Members from the Black Caucus and other caucuses spoke in support, describing Juneteenth as both a celebration of emancipation and a reminder that freedom and equality remain unfinished work. Speakers emphasized Black history, civil rights, solidarity across communities, and ongoing issues such as education, housing, health, incarceration, and economic inequality. The resolution was adopted by voice vote after 66 coauthors were added. The Assembly also considered AB 2285 on blockchain staking and crypto regulation. The author argued the bill would provide consumer protections and clear rules for banks, credit unions, and crypto exchanges, while an opponent warned it could weaken securities oversight and consumer safeguards. The bill passed 45-1, and the author requested immediate transmission to the Senate. Later, SB 1036 on mitigation fee credits for redevelopment passed 55-0 after brief support for clarifying fee rules and reducing duplicative costs. The chamber then adopted the second-day consent calendar, including resolutions for Women’s Equality Day and the International Day of Yoga, along with several Senate bills, all by unanimous or near-unanimous votes. The Assembly announced it would not meet on Friday, June 19, would reconvene Monday, June 22 at 1 p.m., and then adjourned.

Transcript Highlights:

• So at federal staffing supporting CSD's other programs, definitely experienced layoffs. supporting CSD's
• Obviously, CSBG funding supports stable living environments also.
• Obviously, CSBG funding supports stable living environments also.
• And during that time, we use a lot of CSBG money to offer the support.
• So CSBG gives us just one more way that we can support community members.

Summary: The Senate and Assembly Human Services Committees held a special oversight hearing on California’s 2026-27 Community Services Block Grant (CSBG) state plan, a federal anti-poverty funding stream. Committee members opened by citing statewide poverty and homelessness data and said the hearing was meant to review how CSBG dollars are used, how local agencies respond to community needs, and how the state is preparing for possible federal funding cuts. Jason Wimbley of the Department of Community Services and Development (CSD) explained that California’s CSBG network works through 60 organizations in 58 counties, serving about 1.5 million low-income Californians in 2023, and that the state received $68.4 million in federal CSBG funds in fiscal year 2025. He described the program as flexible funding used for housing, employment, education, food, health, transportation, and emergency response, and noted that the federal administration had proposed eliminating CSBG, though the Senate Appropriations Committee had voted to fully fund it for the coming year. Representatives from the California Community Action Partnership Association and several CSBG-funded agencies described how the program supports local anti-poverty work and leverages other funding. CalCAPA emphasized local flexibility, workforce development, partnerships, and data systems such as ROMA, while also warning that agencies are preparing for possible reductions by tightening budgets, planning staffing contingencies, and seeking private foundation support. Agency witnesses from Contra Costa County, Northern California Indian Development Council, Proteus, and Sacred Heart Community Service described services including housing assistance, food distribution, utility help, employment training, youth programs, and culturally specific services for Native communities and migrant farmworkers. They repeatedly said CSBG is essential because it funds staffing and infrastructure that allow them to braid other grants and serve people who do not qualify for standard safety-net programs. Members also asked about the impact of federal staffing changes and the Los Angeles fires. Wimbley said federal layoffs had affected some CSD programs but not CSBG administration, and that the department coordinated disaster response with state agencies and used CSBG-funded supply distribution, food, water, clothing, and documentation support during the fires. Witnesses said they were preparing for possible future cuts by diversifying funding, reducing expenses, and considering service changes, while county officials warned that state and federal reductions could not be backfilled locally. During public comment, one speaker urged stronger oversight of community action agencies and raised concerns about transparency and compliance with state law. The chair then thanked the witnesses, emphasized the importance of CSBG for low-income seniors, youth, and people with disabilities, and adjourned the hearing without any votes or formal action taken.

Transcript Highlights:

• </c><00:07:10.800><c> workforce</c> quality child care to support workforce quality child care to support
• It supports children with special needs and child care.
• </c> 100,000 young children and supporting 100,000 young children and supporting workforce<00:11:41.440
• I'd like to express my support for this bill.
• </c> historic Selma demonstrations. historic Selma demonstrations.

Keywords: Convene 00:00 Senate Message 04:26 Report of Committees 05:13 Orders of the Day/ HB 6 06:22 HB 480 14:13 HB 562 17:55 HB 136 25:53 HB 257 29:47 HB 490 35:54 Motions, Petitions, and Communications 40:30 Introduction of New Bills and Resolutions 52:44 Recess for ConC/Rules Meeting 53:49 ConC/Rules Report 57:12 Floor Amendments 58:49 Adjournment 58:59, 958, all

Transcript Highlights:

• ><c> will</c> The state's financial support will The state's financial support will ensure<00:04:55.000
• </c><00:32:37.800><c> that</c> issues, and so providing support that issues, and so providing support
• </c> this is still a demonstration project. this is still a demonstration project.
• Please support House File 3476.
• </c> support House File 3476. Thank you, Mr. support House File 3476. Thank you, Mr.

Keywords: 919, house, all

Summary: The committee first took up House File 3939, a bill to support a Helping Paws service-dog litter named in honor of Gilbert and the Hortman family. Testimony from Helping Paws and service-dog graduate Angie Foley described the organization’s work, the significance of the “Guided by Gilbert” litter, and how the funding would help train dogs that provide independence and support to people with disabilities, veterans, and others. Members from both parties spoke warmly about Speaker Hortman’s connection to the organization and Gilbert, and the bill was laid over for possible inclusion. The committee then considered House File 3769, the Department of Corrections’ technical omnibus bill, with an A1 amendment adopted to clarify tuberculosis testing language. The bill updates TB screening procedures in correctional facilities, including how refusals are handled, and adds Quantiferon Gold Plus testing as an option alongside existing methods. Members discussed whether the bill would create costs for counties and jails, with some noting added testing and segregation costs and others arguing the changes would improve accuracy and reduce time in restrictive housing. The bill, as amended, was recommended to the general register. House File 3978 was next, a technical cleanup bill for a provider wellness program created last year. The bill expands eligibility and confidentiality protections from physicians to all health care providers, while supporters said the program is meant to address burnout and mental health strain in the workforce and does not require new money. Some members questioned whether the change was redundant or would broaden the program without additional funding, but the Minnesota Medical Association testified that the program is separate from insurance and was intended to serve all providers. The bill was recommended to the general register. Finally, the committee began House File 3476, which Rep. Liebling described as a cleanup bill related to Minnesota’s Medicaid managed care system and public program oversight. She argued that the state spends billions through managed care organizations and that the system has never been proven better than direct payment, setting up a broader discussion of the bill’s purpose and the state’s oversight of public health care spending.

Transcript Highlights:

• We've speaking in support, waiving in support. Okay. That's alright. Waiving in support. Great.
• I appreciate your support.
• , waiving in support R Dana Meter from Orlando, also waiving in support.
• Also waiving in support Kim Jung from Dade City waiving in support.
• support.

Keywords: 999, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• Our townspeople support this law.
• members’ written testimony demonstrates broad support for its passage.
• I'm a huge supporter of public schools.
• He also needs ABA support just to make it through a school day.
• As a teacher and as a parent, I'm asking again that you support House Bill H. 4867 and support small

Bills: H4867, H4927

Keywords: school choice, education policy, educational funding, public schools, student enrollment, applied behavior analysis, autism, education, special needs, school access, therapeutic interventions, 1212, all

Transcript Highlights:

• Again, I support the sustainable aviation fuel, but I cannot support this bill because it's on the backs
• Again, I support the sustainable aviation fuel, but I cannot support this bill because it's on the backs
• President, and rising in obvious support.
• Rising in strong support of this resolution.
• I stand in support. I don't rise in sport.

Bills: SCR8410

Keywords: returning bills to house of origin, sine die, end of session, legislative procedure, Rules Committee, third reading, unfinished business, pending bills, joint resolutions, concurrent resolutions, joint memorials, special session, bill numbering, legislative records, House of Representatives, Senate, Washington Legislature, session adjournment, procedural resolution

Summary: The Senate convened, approved the prior day’s journal, suspended rules to allow committee work and additional floor resolutions, and referred committee and gubernatorial appointment reports as designated. It then took up several gubernatorial appointments in third reading. Megan Matthews was confirmed as director of the Washington State Office of Equity by a 45-2 vote, and Robert A. Zupon, Denise E. Gideon, Andrea Buchanan, Michelle R. Smith, and Edison A. Valerio were each confirmed to various community and technical college boards of trustees by large bipartisan margins. The chamber then considered Engrossed Substitute House Bill 2711, a transportation revenue and policy measure. After rejecting the Transportation Committee’s original striking amendment and adopting a narrower floor striking amendment, senators debated the bill’s changes, including repeal of the luxury aircraft tax and replacement with higher aircraft fuel taxes, registration fees, and an annual excise tax, along with technical corrections and safety-related transportation provisions. Supporters said the bill was a workable compromise that would sustain transportation funding and support future aviation investments; opponents argued it would raise costs on small aircraft owners and general aviation. The bill passed final passage 33-15. The Senate also adopted Senate Resolution 8703 honoring Senator Steve Conway for his 34 years of legislative service. Multiple senators spoke in praise of his leadership on labor, pensions, veterans, and district advocacy, as well as his institutional knowledge, mentorship, and personal integrity. Senator Conway then offered a personal statement thanking colleagues, staff, family, and constituents, and saying he would continue advocating for working people after leaving the Legislature. The Senate then recessed for lunch and caucus.

Transcript Highlights:

• But if the department can demonstrate by a preponderance of the evidence that the act occurred, then
• As Julie might demonstrate to you, if you have further questions about this, oftentimes where this occurs
• Of course, the department has to demonstrate that by a preponderance of the evidence.

Keywords: 989, all

Summary: The Senate Health and Welfare Committee first considered the gubernatorial reappointment of Clayton Steele to the Board of Environmental Quality. Senator Harris moved to send the reappointment to the Senate floor with a recommendation for confirmation, Senator Blaylock seconded, and the committee approved it by voice vote. The committee then reviewed docket 16-0602-2501, foster care licensing rules, presented by Jared Larson of the Department of Health and Welfare with program manager Julie Subcheck available for technical questions. Larson highlighted implementation of kin-specific licensure, a change clarifying that a background check clearance does not prevent later revocation of a license, and a foster parent suitability standard allowing the department to deny licensure based on criminal conduct shown by a preponderance of the evidence even without a conviction. Senators asked about the 2023 age change from 21 to 23 for the program; Larson said participation had increased, he had not heard downsides, and the department would provide a written summary. The committee then approved the foster care licensing docket by voice vote. Finally, the committee considered docket 16-0613-2501, a pending rule repealing the Emergency Assistance for Families and Children chapter. Larson and division administrator Laura Denner explained the program is entirely federally funded and the existing state rules were essentially a copy of federal law, so the department was repealing the docket to avoid duplicating higher authority. With no questions from the committee, Senator Shippy moved to approve the repeal docket, Senator Blaylock seconded, and it passed by voice vote.

Transcript Highlights:

• </c><00:21:01.360><c> of</c> project uh we're here in support of project uh we're here in support of
• </c><01:06:24.799><c> the</c> increased aid but not supporting the increased aid but not supporting the
• </c> months these examples help demonstrate months these examples help demonstrate the<01:37:22.520><
• demonstrated that their families have demonstrated that they<01:44:39.119><c> do</c><01:44:39.320><c
• </c><03:18:48.160><c> HB</c> security I ask you to support HB security I ask you to support HB 646<03

Keywords: 928, house, all

Summary: The committee took up HB 651, a school-funding bill that would raise the base cost of an adequate education and increase differentiated aid for students in poverty, English language learners, and special education. The chair opened with housekeeping notices about parking and eating in committee spaces, and noted a revised fiscal note would be distributed. Representative David Luneau presented the bill as part of a broader package of public school funding measures, explaining that HB 651 builds on HB 550 and is intended to respond to court rulings and the ongoing school-funding litigation by adjusting both the base adequacy amount and equity-based funding factors. Luneau said the bill would raise the state’s adequacy grant from about $4,100 to $7,351 per student and increase differentiated aid, while also updating statutory language so future recalculations include the court-identified resource elements. He argued the measure is about fairness and shifting more of the burden from local property taxpayers to the state, not about increasing overall education spending. He reviewed fiscal-note figures indicating the bill would add roughly $576 million to the state share of school funding, bringing the total state share to about $1.65 billion, and said the note also mentions possible effects on charter schools and vouchers. Committee members asked about the evidence supporting higher costs for low-income and English learner students, how long ESL funding should continue, why free-and-reduced-lunch aid remains higher than special education aid, whether the formula is based on enrollment or average daily membership, and whether the bill is truly equitable across districts of different sizes and needs. Luneau and later witness Zach Shen of the New Hampshire School Funding Fairness Project said the bill is supported by research and court findings, that the current formula relies heavily on local property taxes, and that shifting more funding to the state would reduce property-tax pressure and help address disparities among districts. Shen also cited broad public support for the related HB 550 testimony and said HB 651 is intended as a step toward a more equitable funding system. No vote or final action was taken in the portion provided.

Transcript Highlights:

• Members, support, support bills. Remember, support, support bills. Let's move.
• In particular, in Los Angeles, this bill is a support bill and has received bipartisan support.
• This bill has support, support, respectfully ask, but I vote. Thank you, Assembly Member Gibson.
• This is a support, support bill. Please vote aye. Thank you, Assembly Member Harbidian.
• This is a support, support bill. Please vote aye. Thank you, Assembly Member Harbinion.

Summary: The Assembly convened, initially lacked a quorum, then completed the roll call and prayer, adopted routine procedural motions, and moved through the daily file with many bills passed and retained or passed outright. Early measures included AB 2417 on community college faculty retirement information, AB 1579 expanding the Children’s Crisis Pilot Program, AB 2041 on emergency medical services reporting, AB 1547 on a UC medical school feasibility study in Kern County, and AB 1552 directing higher education segments to report on civic engagement and democracy education. The body also took up SB 73, an urgency elections-security bill, where supporters argued it would protect ballots, voting systems, and election workers from interference, while opponents said it could be unconstitutional, partisan, and overly restrictive of local and federal investigations. SB 73 passed with urgency and immediate transmittal to the Senate. The Assembly then approved a long series of policy bills, many with unanimous or near-unanimous votes, including AB 1554 on California Earthquake Authority transparency, AB 1584 on civil rights duties at the Air Resources Board, AB 1592 on the California Indian Cultural Center, AB 1629 on direct payment to dentists, AB 1645 on prison visitation physical-contact rules, AB 1688 on foster care notice and accountability, AB 1699 on prescribed and cultural burns, AB 1738 on virtual final inspections for single-family homes, AB 1741 on charging sexual battery during a residential break-in as a wobbler, AB 1802 on mitigation lands endowments, AB 1813 on community renewable energy program changes, AB 1899 creating a youth homelessness prevention office, AB 1904 on a credentialing apprenticeship program, AB 1941 on organized metal theft, AB 2043 on drone-attack prevention for mass gatherings and critical infrastructure, AB 2054 on paid family leave for military relatives, AB 2081 on home-based Medi-Cal care, AB 2116 on predatory lending, AB 2122 limiting bench warrants for vehicle-code infractions, AB 2176 on student housing coordination, AB 2187 on tribal public-contract exemptions, AB 2221 on charitable fundraising processing deadlines, AB 2232 on advance parole hearing reporting, AB 2235 on confidentiality of judges’ home addresses, AB 2250 on cannabis/hemp enforcement cleanup, and AB 2266 on electricity. Most measures were described as support or bipartisan bills and passed with little or no opposition. A few bills drew notable debate or recorded opposition, including AB 1813, AB 2122, and SB 73, though all ultimately passed. After finishing 35 items, the Assembly announced it would return the following week with a much larger file, noted upcoming floor amendment deadlines, and adjourned until Tuesday, May 26 at 1 p.m. A post-adjournment vote change was also recorded, changing Assembly Member Dixon’s vote on AB 2041 from aye to no.

Transcript Highlights:

• So we are very much in support of this bill.
• Today we wanted to come and speak in firm support of Senate Bill 1288.
• I would ask you all to vote in support.
• But once supports were in place, everything changed. He went back to school.
• And I am in support of House Bill 624.

Keywords: 989, all

Summary: The committee first heard House Bill 531, which updates Idaho law on epinephrine delivery systems in schools by changing language from a single auto-injector reference to broader “delivery system” terminology. Sponsor Camille Blaylock and supporting testimony from a school nurse and Idaho PTA said the change would allow schools to use newer FDA-approved options such as nasal spray without adding fiscal or training requirements. The committee asked whether the bill required schools to keep epinephrine on hand, and was told it did not; the bill was then sent to the floor with a due pass recommendation. The committee then took up Senate Bill 1288, creating the Idaho High Needs Student Fund to reimburse districts and charters for unusually high special education costs above a $30,000 threshold, with higher reimbursement levels above that amount and a cap per student. Testimony from school boards, district administrators, educators, and parent advocates described large costs for nursing care, interpreters, behavioral supports, Braille materials, and other federally required services, and argued the fund would help districts meet IDEA obligations without destabilizing local budgets. Members asked about the rural/non-rural funding split, the prior year’s version of the bill, and the current special education funding gap; Superintendent Critchfield said districts are currently covering these costs from operations and that the broader funding formula still needs adjustment. The committee approved the bill and sent it to the floor with a due pass recommendation. Finally, the committee considered House Bill 624, which revises rules for virtual education programs and virtual charter schools, especially Idaho Home Learning Academy. The bill requires board approval of contracts with education service providers, residency verification, curriculum aligned to state standards, conflict-of-interest safeguards, limits on direct payments to parents, and Idaho certification for teachers, while preserving local control over approved expenses and teacher oversight. Supporters from Idaho Home Learning Academy, Boundary County, Bonneville, and Idaho Parents Unlimited said the bill balances accountability with flexibility and helps preserve public school choice for families, especially in rural areas. The committee moved the bill to the floor with a due pass recommendation and then adjourned after recognizing a Senate page.