Video & Transcript : 'postpayment review' :
Page 167 of 500
ID
Transcript Highlights:
- Dopple was created, there was a legislative audit that went back three years prior to Dopple and reviewed
- Administrators to present docket number 24-4101, which is found starting on page 455 of your legislative review
- request approval to repeal docket number 24-091-2501, which starts on page 430 of your legislative review
- to request approval to repeal docket 24-1901-2501, found starting on page 439 of your legislative review
- of the board to present docket number 24-1701-2501, which is found on page 435 of your legislative review
Committee:
House Health and Welfare
OK
Oklahoma 2026 Regular Session
Incentive Evaluation Commission -IEC- Jan 29th, 2026 at 10:00 am
Transcript Highlights:
- but this is, you know, an important commission in the fact that what we're doing is looking at and reviewing
- That is new and that is the one that has not been reviewed in a prior year.
- Review and approve the for your cycle. So, is there a second? And second in roll call, please.
- Rita Armer, on the selection of the 226 evaluation criteria, which would probably also include the review
- for the Side act for review of the incentives.
ND
North Dakota 2026 1st Special Session
Artificial Intelligence and Data Center Committee Jul 15th, 2026
Artificial Intelligence and Data Center Committee
Transcript Highlights:
- Chairman, need to review attempts at the federal level to preempt state regulation of AI.
- I've reviewed the memo—some really great information in there.
- It provides consumers with an ability to go back and have those decisions reviewed.
- After IT review, approval has occurred, so now we're at the end of that second stage.
- This is the detailed third-party security review that we do at NDIT.
Summary:
The committee held its first meeting on artificial intelligence and data centers, establishing its purpose as a study and policy-development body rather than one aimed at producing many bills. Majority Leader Hogue urged members to move quickly, focus on federal and other states’ AI laws, consider possible federal preemption, child protections, and the siting and economic impacts of data centers. Committee leadership echoed that the goal is practical, balanced governance that protects North Dakota while allowing innovation to continue.
Legislative Council staff provided a background memo and NCSL presented a detailed overview of AI concepts and the current state legislative landscape. The presentations distinguished narrow AI, generative AI, agentic AI, and theoretical AGI/ASI, and summarized major state policy themes: comprehensive AI laws in states such as Utah, Colorado, Texas, California, and Illinois; targeted laws on deepfakes, chatbots, health, education, notifications, and digital likeness; and growing use of appropriations and agency inventories. Members asked about Colorado’s repeal and reenactment, Texas’s sandbox and training provisions, oversight structures, and whether AI regulation is bipartisan; presenters said most issues cut across party lines, with broad agreement on child safety and deepfakes but more division on broader regulatory approaches.
The federal update focused on executive orders, preemption, and congressional activity. NCSL described a White House framework favoring a single federal standard, a DOJ litigation task force, Commerce Department review of state laws, and possible funding conditions tied to state AI policy, though no formal state-law challenge had yet occurred. The presentation also covered a recent executive order creating a voluntary federal vetting process for advanced frontier models after safety concerns, and congressional proposals including a failed 10-year state moratorium, Senator Blackburn’s child-safety bills, the Kids Online Safety Act, a House-passed children’s digital safety package, a Senate data center moratorium proposal, and a House ratepayer/data-center bill. The committee took no formal action beyond receiving testimony and asking questions.
ND
North Dakota 2026 1st Special Session
Higher Education Institutions Committee Apr 9th, 2026 at 08:30 am
Higher Education Institutions Committee
Transcript Highlights:
- They're reviewing comprehensively all of the digital evidence.
- So like I said, in that review of our study of what we were doing, sorry.
- As mentioned, this has been a topic that has been discussed and reviewed.
- As mentioned, this has been a topic that has been discussed and reviewed.
- Chair Sickler, I think you bring up a great metric that we should review.
ND
North Dakota 2026 1st Special Session
Higher Education Institutions Committee Apr 9th, 2026
Transcript Highlights:
- They're reviewing comprehensively all of the digital evidence.
- So, like I said, in that review of our study of what we were doing... Sorry.
- So, like I said, in that review of our study of what we were doing... Sorry.
- As mentioned, this has been a topic that has been discussed and reviewed.
- Chair Sickler, I think you bring up a great metric that we should review.
Summary:
The committee met on the Minot State campus for a presentation from President Shirley and several university leaders on enrollment, academics, workforce initiatives, and partnerships. Shirley reviewed the university’s financial audits, noting mostly clean results with only minor technical findings in recent years, and highlighted Minot State’s major programs, specialized accreditations, and ties to Minot Air Force Base and NCAA Division II athletics. Members asked about education workforce shortages, athletic tuition waivers, dual credit incentives, and the university’s in-state tuition policy for all students. Shirley also discussed the university’s recruitment efforts, including the Hometown Pride and Academic Excellence scholarships, campus visit growth, and the Emerging Scholars dual-credit reimbursement program.
A major focus was workforce development and new academic offerings supported by legislative Workforce Education Innovation Funds. Shirley described the new Innovation Engineering program, which was developed with industry input to train broadly skilled engineers for western North Dakota, and said it had already drawn more applicants than expected. Dr. Crystal St. Peter presented a new master’s program in counseling that integrates mental health and addiction counseling to address statewide provider shortages, with a hybrid format to reach rural students. Members asked about licensure requirements, internship hours, and job placement for graduates. Shirley also outlined a new nursing simulation center and health sciences space in downtown Minot, made possible by state support and the purchase of the former Trinity Health Center West building.
The committee also heard about Minot State’s efforts to build pipelines into education and special education, including the Aspire program for rural high school students and an online paraprofessional-to-special-education degree pathway. Shirley said these programs, along with new articulation agreements and a large Bush Foundation grant, are intended to address teacher shortages and keep students in North Dakota. No formal committee votes or actions were taken during the presentation; the session consisted of informational updates and member questions.
MD
Transcript Highlights:
- process for special retrospective review process for special pediatric<00:20:48.960><c> hospitals.
- </c><00:21:02.320><c> of</c> provide for a retrospective review of provide for a retrospective review
- process be conducted by a review process be conducted by a licensed<00:21:20.280><c> physician.
- </c> the scope of the retrospective review the scope of the retrospective review from<00:21:29.120><c
- on the panel of the Governor's review on the panel of the Governor's Office<00:23:53.640><c> of</c><
ND
North Dakota 2026 1st Special Session
Agriculture and Water Management Committee Mar 31st, 2026 at 09:30 am
Agriculture and Water Management Committee
Transcript Highlights:
- it would take a significant amount of time and resources to review all of those.
- Just to review some of the things that we talked about in the last committee meetings, I wanted to review
- Just to review some of the things that we talked about in the last committee meetings, I wanted to review
- It's possible it takes them, you know, two to three to four weeks to review it.
- It's possible it takes them, you know, two to three to four weeks to review it.
MN
Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session
Legislative Commission on Pensions and Retirement - 03/17/26
Minnesota Senate Floor Meeting
Transcript Highlights:
- It's just a quick review. Um, I'm happy to do that.
- It's just a quick review. review. review.
- Um, consider the members a quick review.
- You Wilson can do a staff memo review.
- </c> plan membership committee, which reviews plan membership committee, which reviews changes<00:41:
CA
California 2025-2026 Regular Session
Assembly Budget Subcommittee No. 2 on Human Services May 21st, 2025
Transcript Highlights:
- We have concerns about the proposed exemption from review or approval by the Department of Technology
- Just very briefly, because then we should get on with revision, review of the May Revise.
- We conducted a review of how the IHSS administration funding works.
- $250,000 for a fiscal review, and an audit is independent at half a million dollars a year.
- Just to note that we're continuing to review and we'll communicate with staff as needed.
Summary:
The hearing began with opening remarks on the Governor’s May Revision for child care and human services, with committee members and advocates stressing that the budget should not be balanced on the backs of low-income families, children, and providers. Legislative members and public witnesses strongly opposed the proposed suspension of the child care COLA, reductions to the Emergency Child Care Bridge Program, and the lack of codified rate reform tied to the alternative methodology. Several speakers also urged more support for providers affected by the Eaton fire and other disasters, and called for child care to be funded at the true cost of care and for additional slots to be restored.
Administration, LAO, and Department of Education staff described the child care proposal as maintaining existing funding levels while adding administrative resources to prepare for federally required prospective payment changes and single-rate reform. The administration said the May Revision would suspend the 2025–26 COLA and reduce Bridge Program funding to align with utilization, while the LAO raised questions about the size and purpose of the proposed rate-reform and prospective-payment funding and recommended rejecting a Department of Technology exemption. CDE supported continued early education investments but said it would need additional resources if prospective pay were extended to state preschool, and it objected to a proposed reallocation of preschool funds for inclusive education grants.
The committee then moved to the IHSS portion of the May Revision. DSS outlined five major proposals: capping provider work hours at 50 per week, eliminating IHSS for undocumented adults age 19 and older, shifting certain Community First Choice reassessment penalties to counties, reinstating the Medi-Cal asset test as a conforming IHSS reduction, and automating the termination of IHSS when Medi-Cal eligibility ends. DSS also discussed funding to implement a federal HCBS access rule and a separate reassessment of IHSS administrative methodology that found counties would need additional administrative funding. Finance said the proposals were intended to slow program growth and improve sustainability, while the LAO said it was still analyzing the package and raised concerns about implementation, county workload, and the potential loss of services.
Committee members and public commenters criticized the IHSS cuts, especially the overtime cap and the elimination of services for undocumented adults and people affected by the asset test. Advocates argued that IHSS workers and recipients depend on these services, that county administration is already underfunded, and that the proposals could destabilize vulnerable consumers. The chair closed by saying the committee would continue to fight for child care and would not pause on child care, and the meeting recessed before moving on to the remaining May Revision items.
MN
Transcript Highlights:
- That said, that process is now in kind of an extended period of review.
- 00:01:49.920><c> extended</c><00:01:50.479><c> period</c><00:01:50.720><c> of</c><00:01:51.040><c> review
- </c> kind of an extended period of review. kind of an extended period of review.
- </c> the task force has met, we've reviewed the task force has met, we've reviewed data,<01:15:47.600
- </c><01:19:12.960><c> the</c> review panel recommendations and the review panel recommendations and the
Bills:
HF333 , HF2712 , HF1064 , HF1069 , HF1113 , HF2207 , HF204 , HF2867 , HF2924 , HF746 , HF1530 , HF2587 , HF1078
Committee:
House Capital Investment
Keywords:
HF333, Duluth, Lot D, redevelopment, capital investment, bonding bill, state bonds, bond proceeds, public infrastructure, seawall repair, utility connections, demolition, debris removal, transportation improvements, site preparation, soil correction, economic development, DEED, capital appropriation, general obligation bonds
NH
New Hampshire 2025 Regular Session
Senate Election Law and Municipal Affairs (04/08/2025)
Election Law and Municipal Affairs
Transcript Highlights:
- So once the threat goes away, reviewed.
- Um, but after 60 days or 30 days, there probably should be a review process to give it more time for
- But if they're going to use the argument of threats to public health, then that should have a review
- Um, so the idea that there's further review and have citizen input after a period of time, if you're
- Um, but after 60 days or 30 days, there probably should be a review process to give it more time for
Committee:
Senate Election Law and Municipal Affairs
MN
Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session
House Fraud Prevention and State Agency Oversight Policy Committee 4/7/25
Fraud Prevention and State Agency Oversight Policy
Transcript Highlights:
- The program is reviewed frequently and extensively.
- So, it is highly reviewed, and we work really hard to address items that may come up.
- </c><01:23:57.199><c> benefit</c> peer and federal reviewed benefit peer and federal reviewed benefit
- 24:02.159><c> and</c> program is reviewed frequently and program is reviewed frequently and extensively
- And the program is reviewed by future.
MN
Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session
House Environment and Natural Resources Finance and Policy Committee 3/27/25
Environment and Natural Resources Finance and Policy
Transcript Highlights:
- During that review, we often require additional information from the applicant.
- as opposed to post-completeness technical reviews.
- 37:21.920><c> reviews.
- </c><01:37:22.560><c> If</c> postcompleteness technical reviews.
- If postcompleteness technical reviews.
Keywords:
HF1587, Cass County, Minnesota Department of Natural Resources, DNR, condemnation, eminent domain, state land, surplus land, public waters, tribal land transfer, federally recognized Indian Tribe, tribal ownership, land conveyance, no consideration, land appropriation, natural resources, U.S. Highway 2, Section 27 Township 145 North Range 28 West, land return, Tribal sovereignty
HI
Hawaii 2025 Regular Session
CPN-EIG, CPN-HHS, CPN DEFER Public Hearings 02-11-2025
Commerce and Consumer Protection
Transcript Highlights:
- If you have submitted it in writing already, we have reviewed all the testimony, so there is no need
- If you have submitted it in writing already, we have reviewed all the testimony, so there is no need
- We want the regulatory agency in Hawaii to simply review them and approve them along the way.
- </c><01:25:58.760><c> them</c> agency in Hawaii to Simply review them agency in Hawaii to Simply review
- </c><01:38:08.199><c> Studies</c> because over 2,000 peer-reviewed Studies because over 2,000 peer-reviewed
Committee:
Senate Commerce and Consumer Protection
Summary:
The joint Senate hearing focused primarily on SB 1201, a wildfire measure that would create a wildfire recovery fund and allow securitization for electric utilities. Hawaiian Electric strongly supported the bill, saying it would help protect customers, property owners, insurers, and the broader economy from future catastrophic wildfire liability while improving the utility’s credit profile and lowering financing costs. Support also came from DCCA Consumer Advocacy, the Attorney General’s office on written comments, Ulupono Initiative, Clearway Energy Group, IBEW Local 1260, Par Hawaii, KIUC, the Chamber of Commerce Hawaiʻi, Plus Power, and numerous organizations and individuals. Opponents or commenters raised concerns about the liability cap, victim compensation process, and fund structure, including the Hawaiʻi Association for Justice, the Hawaiʻi Regional Council of Carpenters, and the Hawaiʻi Insurance Council; Henry Curtis of Life of the Land supported the concept of a fund but questioned the catastrophe threshold and whether the fund would be empty without a prudency finding.
Much of the discussion centered on whether the proposed fund would actually help restore Hawaiian Electric to investment grade, with senators comparing the proposal to California’s wildfire fund. Hawaiian Electric said the bill was only one part of a broader process, alongside physical risk reduction and settlement finalization, and argued that without the bill the utility would not regain investment grade. Senators also questioned the proposed $1 billion fund size, the fairness of ratepayer contributions versus shareholder contributions, and whether customers should pay for consulting and administrative costs; Hawaiian Electric said its proposed amendment would remove those consulting-related charges. The company also said the fund would accrue interest and, if unused, could be returned to customers, and that there would be replenishment and supplemental contribution mechanisms if the fund were exhausted.
The Attorney General’s office said it still had further amendments to discuss, and the departments had not yet resolved where the fund should reside administratively, though Hawaiian Electric said it believed DCCA was the appropriate place but was open to alternatives. KIUC requested two amendments. No vote or final committee action was taken during the hearing, and the measure remained under discussion with questions and proposed amendments still outstanding.
KY
Kentucky 2026 Regular Session
House Legislative Session Day 48 (3-17-26)
Kentucky House Floor Meeting
Transcript Highlights:
- c> Multiple peer-reviewed studies including Multiple peer-reviewed studies including the<01:21:34.239
- </c> registration review for atrizine registration review for atrizine concluded<01:22:00.159><c> in<
- That review is conducted by the same chief justice that now reviews such requests, but without first
- It is a fair, independent review of the appearance of bias.
- ><c> now</c><01:45:27.760><c> reviews</c><01:45:28.159><c> such</c> chief justice that now reviews such
CA
California 2025-2026 Regular Session
Assembly Privacy and Consumer Protection Committee Jun 23rd, 2026
Privacy and Consumer Protection
Transcript Highlights:
- We are, CTA is still reviewing the... are opposed and less amended. Thank you. Thank you.
- CTA is still reviewing the amendments, but we have some preliminary takes on them.
- I would like to thank the author and the staff and look forward to reviewing the amendments.
- Every environmental review, every rulemaking, every local planning decision is at stake.
- Every environmental review, every rulemaking, every local planning decision is at stake.
Committee:
House Privacy and Consumer Protection
CA
California 2025-2026 Regular Session
Senate Budget and Fiscal Review Subcommittee No. 2 on Resources, Environmental Protection and Energy May 21st, 2026
Transcript Highlights:
- the creation of this program or the starting of this program, and that on an annual basis it can review
- We have, as I said, reviewed and the project done. The project.
- We have, as I said, reviewed, and the project does address a lot of the objectives in our strategic plan
- And actually, it was reviewed by what was called blind, double-blind scientific peer review.
- And actually, it was reviewed by what was called blind, double-blind scientific peer review to understand
Summary:
The subcommittee heard an overview of the May Revision from the Department of Finance and the Legislative Analyst’s Office, focused on resources, environmental protection, energy, and related budget issues. Finance said the May Revision keeps the budget balanced in 2026-27 and 2027-28, narrows the structural deficit, and proposes major investments in natural resources, including Proposition 4 bond funding for the Golden Gate Fields acquisition, wildlife refuge and wetland projects, Fort Ord Dunes campground operations, Healthy Rivers and Landscapes, wildfire-human coexistence, and beverage container recycling. The LAO praised stronger-than-expected revenues but argued the state still has a structural deficit and is relying too heavily on reserves, recommending more reserve deposits and fewer new discretionary expenditures.
Members questioned several proposals, especially the Golden Gate Fields purchase and the Healthy Rivers and Landscapes Program. Agency officials said the Golden Gate Fields site is a time-limited opportunity, would be remediated by the current owner, transferred to East Bay Regional Park District after closing, and restricted to park/open-space uses rather than commercial development. On Healthy Rivers and Landscapes, Finance and the Natural Resources Agency said the $25 million request would help launch year one of the program, support scientific monitoring, and maintain commitments to environmental flows and habitat restoration; the LAO said the request was premature because the Bay-Delta plan has not yet been formally adopted and the state’s total funding commitment remains unclear. Officials also discussed water storage, subsidence, and the need for ongoing investments in aquifer recharge, aqueduct repairs, and recycling.
The committee also reviewed a proposed $1 million shift for the Coexisting with Wildlife Initiative. Fish and Wildlife and the Cattlemen’s Association said the money would support limited-term staffing, deterrence tools, and livestock-loss compensation, while acknowledging the amount is modest compared with the need. Members emphasized the growing human-wildlife conflict problem and the importance of nonlethal deterrence and public education. The discussion then turned to greenhouse gas reduction fund revenues and transit; members warned that lower auction revenues and possible CARB rule changes could leave little or nothing for Tier 3 programs such as transit, clean water, and air-quality programs. Finance and the LAO said the Legislature should plan for multiple revenue scenarios and consider whether the existing cap-and-invest spending framework still matches current revenue expectations and priorities.
VT
Transcript Highlights:
- hospital must notify the agency to inform its health care transformation work and board so it can review
- Section 2, 21 V.S.A. 9456, the budget review.
- </c><00:41:29.760><c> impact</c><00:41:30.160><c> of</c><00:41:30.319><c> the</c> board so it can review
- the impact of the board so it can review the impact of the hospital's<00:41:31.040><c> budget.
- </c><00:41:39.200><c> This</c> 21 VSA 9456, the budget review. This 21 VSA 9456, the budget review.
CA
California 2025-2026 Regular Session
Assembly Emergency Management Committee Mar 17th, 2026
Transcript Highlights:
- Following the pause, Cal OES undertook an extensive review of the system and engaged directly with local
- As a result of that review, Cal OES developed a revised strategy for simplifying the architecture and
- So it sounds like they are reviewing your contracts, but are they reviewing the work and the progress
- We welcome oversight and accountability, along with technical review.
- We welcome oversight and accountability, along with technical review.
Summary:
The Emergency Management Committee held an oversight hearing on California’s Next Generation 911 rollout, focusing on Cal OES’s decision to move away from the original regional vendor model toward a statewide provider model. Cal OES said the regional architecture created complexity at the boundaries between regions, leading to misrouted calls, transfer problems, and degraded audio, and that a statewide model would better align with national standards and provide a more reliable, secure system. The Legislative Analyst’s Office urged the Legislature to pause further implementation until it has more information on the problems, tradeoffs, costs, and oversight needs, and recommended stronger reporting and possibly independent technical review before proceeding.
Committee members pressed Cal OES on accountability, cost, testing, vendor selection, and whether the current system is safe. Cal OES said the project has cost about $456 million so far, most of it recurring service fees, and that 23 PSAPs had transitioned voice traffic while more than 440 total PSAPs remain in the state. Officials said the current system is operating, that a pause would not put the public at risk, and that the statewide conversion could be completed by summer 2030. Members and the LAO raised concerns about whether Cal OES has enough technical oversight and whether contract language alone is sufficient to prevent repeat problems.
The vendor panel largely defended the regional model and argued that the existing system is already built, tested, and ready to expand. NGA 911, Synergem, Lumen, and Atos said the regional architecture provides redundancy and resilience, that early problems were often tied to legacy-system integration, carrier issues, or training rather than the regional design itself, and that a statewide redesign would add cost and delay. Atos said it serves as the statewide backbone and backup and has already carried live traffic, while vendors emphasized that they support continued modernization but believe California should build on the current regional investment rather than replace it.
WA
Washington 2025-2026 Regular Session
Senate Transportation Feb 27th, 2026 at 02:30 pm
Transportation
Transcript Highlights:
- It authorizes the commission to convene a fatality review committee to review incidents involving the
- Department of Licensing and other information the department determines as relevant for compliance review
- second process allows cities, counties, and the state to petition the Transportation Commission to review
- second process allows cities, counties, and the state to petition the Transportation Commission to review
- and the legislature must make a final determination. to the legislature for review, and the legislature
Committee:
Senate Transportation
Keywords:
vehicle ownership, insurance, title transfer, consumer protection, motor vehicle, oil tanker, tank vessel, restricted waters, Puget Sound, San Juan Islands, Rosario Strait, Admiralty Inlet, Discovery Island, New Dungeness, tug escort, pilotage, marine safety, spill prevention, oil transport, petroleum shipment