Transcript Highlights:

• I know you guys are used to digital things, but that's good.
• are used to digital things, but that's<00:11:14.320><c> good.
• So, I see this as an opportunity to actually help these families. Yeah.
• I welcome the opportunity to work with you on this important topic.
• And this legislation gives them the opportunity to be able to do that.

Keywords: 1191, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• </c> essentially computer use and digital essentially computer use and digital literacy<01:01:10.559>
• </c> written is that computer use and digital written is that computer use and digital literacy<01:12
• . opportunity. opportunity.
• </c> opportunities for low-income families. opportunities for low-income families.
• This claim was to opportunity.

Keywords: 1189, house, all

Transcript Highlights:

• The UK has a tax on digital services.
• Chair, firstly, again, thank you for the opportunity to present to the committee.
• I want to thank you for the opportunity to be here today. I'm Kayla Kitson.
• Again, I want to thank you for the opportunity to testify on why it's critical.
• Good morning, everyone, and thank you very much for the opportunity to be here.

Summary: The joint informational hearing examined California’s taxation of multinational corporations, especially the Water’s Edge election versus worldwide combined reporting. Chairs opened by framing the issue as a review of whether current rules fairly and sufficiently tax foreign subsidiary income, given profit shifting concerns, budget pressures, and the long history since Water’s Edge was adopted in the 1980s. The first panel from the Legislative Analyst’s Office and Franchise Tax Board explained the mechanics of unitary taxation, apportionment, and the Water’s Edge election, and provided filing data showing Water’s Edge filers are a small share of returns but account for a large share of corporate tax liability. FTB witnesses said the agency already administers both methods and could handle a shift to mandatory worldwide reporting with education and outreach, though revenue estimates are difficult because foreign affiliate information is not directly available. Committee members asked about foreign government pushback, administrative burden, industries with more profit shifting, revenue uncertainty, and whether companies would leave California. LAO and FTB witnesses said pushback from foreign governments was plausible, but they did not expect major business flight because California’s tax is largely based on sales rather than physical presence. They also said worldwide reporting could reduce profit shifting but might increase revenue volatility and litigation risk. A second panel of academic and tax policy witnesses argued that Water’s Edge is a loophole that rewards aggressive tax planning, that worldwide combined reporting would better capture income tied to California, and that modern federal and international rules such as NCTI/GILTI, CAMT, and Pillar Two reduce compliance concerns and make a return to worldwide reporting more feasible. They also said California’s current system can create selection effects and may under-tax large multinationals. In the next panel, a California Budget and Policy Center witness urged eliminating the Water’s Edge election, calling it a costly loophole that benefits large global corporations over smaller domestic businesses and deprives the state of billions in revenue that could support health care and other services. A Silicon Valley Leadership Group witness gave historical context for why Water’s Edge was adopted and began outlining concerns about compliance, double taxation, and the risk of overreaching beyond income truly connected to California. No bill was voted on or advanced; the hearing was informational only, with members using the testimony to weigh the policy trade-offs and possible transition periods if the Legislature were to change the current rules.

Transcript Highlights:

• The next two agencies, the Idaho Digital Learning Academy and the Idaho Educational Services for the
• Thank you for the opportunity. Mr.
• The other area that we're looking at updating would be around digital content and curriculum.
• ... ...to other funding streams or funding opportunities that our schools have.
• SDE has applied this rescission to funding that is otherwise used for advanced opportunities payments

Summary: The committee received a detailed JFAC presentation on the K-12 public school support budget from Legislative Services analyst Kellan McGurkin, followed by testimony from Superintendent Debbie Critchfield. McGurkin reviewed how Idaho’s school funding formula works, including support units, staff allowance, career ladder salary funding, discretionary funding, health insurance, transportation, facilities, and the Public Education Stabilization Fund. He explained the FY 2026 revised budget, including a reduction in projected support units and an ongoing $22.3 million general fund rescission, and then walked through the FY 2027 request and the Governor’s recommendation. Major FY 2027 items included health insurance adjustments, transportation growth, federal fund authority, and proposed one-time special education initiatives: a $5 million high-needs fund and a $1 million regional service model, both tied to interest or transfers from other funds. The Governor also recommended eliminating or reducing some items, including virtual school-related payments and a reduction to Idaho Digital Learning Academy funding, which would lower the general fund request compared with the agency proposal. Critchfield framed the budget around enrollment trends, shifting student populations, and the need for flexibility in how districts use existing dollars. She highlighted gains in literacy, graduation rates, dual credit and career technical participation, and said the department wants more categorical flexibility for professional development, technology, and digital content funds so districts can redirect unused money to higher priorities such as literacy or special education. She also described the Idaho Career Ready Students grant as having created 170 new programs and said remaining funds are obligated. On special education, she said costs are growing faster than current funding and argued for a bridge solution while broader funding issues are addressed; she also said the department is pursuing a regional service-center model to help rural districts share hard-to-fill specialists. Critchfield additionally outlined planned federal waivers on assessments and flexibility, and said the state is seeking more control over education decisions. Committee members focused heavily on funding mechanics, especially whether career ladder and health insurance money is distributed per teacher or through support units, how discretionary funds are used, why insurance amounts in the budget book differed from current projections, and whether districts can use leftover health insurance dollars for other purposes. Members also questioned the proposed special education funding, the use of interest earnings from dedicated funds to support the general fund, the size and use of school contingency balances, and whether the state should revisit the funding formula itself. No votes were taken during this portion of the meeting; the discussion remained in presentation and questioning, with several follow-up requests for data and clarification.

Transcript Highlights:

• Just presuming we have them digitally signed by you and Co-Chair Adams would be effectively the way that
• I don't know if Jan has had the opportunity to go up there yet to look at them, but how would you even
• If they do have events on July 5th, this is the opportunity to bring people together, share a meal, and
• So this will be an opportunity for every state to submit one object and one piece of paper that will
• States have an opportunity to submit existing projects and events and activities that will be happening

Keywords: 989, all

Summary: The America 250 Advisory Council met with a quorum and first approved the prior minutes. Staff then provided a financial update showing most of the $250,000 celebration fund had been allocated, with about $9,147.70 expected to return to the commemorative fund after two outstanding grants are finalized, and total expenditures reported at $344,310.88 across related accounts. Members thanked staff for keeping the grants and payments moving so local events could be planned. The council then received legal guidance from the Attorney General’s Office on contracts and spending authority. Counsel explained that the committee as a whole controls the commemorative funds, may delegate contract work to subcommittees or individuals, and should clearly identify who is authorized to sign each contract. The council voted to require that any legally binding agreements approved by the committee be sent to the co-chairs for signature, and that signed agreements be shared with Legislative Services and the Treasurer’s Office for recordkeeping and payment processing, with questions routed back to the co-chairs. Members also discussed a specific $20,000 celebration contract for organizers, noting it had already been funded and was still being finalized for signature. Updates followed on the ambassador program, including nearly 2,000 ambassadors, extensive city/county/business/school logo participation, a large quilt display at the Capitol, service challenge progress, and plans for the Liberty Bell carriage and fountain projects. The governor’s task force report highlighted upcoming America 250 initiatives such as the July 8 “Sharing the Spirit of America” reading event, the youth art campaign “My America, From Ground Zero to Common Ground,” America’s Potluck, and website updates. The federal report covered the National Archives’ “America’s Time Capsule,” “America’s Block Party,” Flag Sojourn, America’s Field Trip, America Innovates, the expanded congressional caucus, and the Great American State Fair in Washington, D.C. Finally, the council approved grant disbursements for Power County, the City of Nampa, the City of Heyburn, and Jerome County, and scheduled the next meeting for April 20.

Transcript Highlights:

• I'm the specialty producer for Chris 6 News in Corpus Christi, and I appreciate the opportunity opportunity
• Thank you for the opportunity to speak in favor of this bill. of HB 4219.
• I'm a policy analyst with the Texas Public Policy Foundation and I'd like to thank you for the opportunity
• Last session, you were right to work with me on on central bank digital currency and prohibiting that
• The right to repair only works if we're given the opportunity to repair.

Bills: HB 431, HB 1522, HB 1922, HB 2467, HB 2468, HB 3228, HB 3229, HB 3306, HB 3803, HB 3804, HB 3805, HB 3806, HB 4219, HB 4238, HB 4344, HB 4386, HB 4739

Keywords: HB 431, Texas Property Code, Property Code Chapter 202, solar roof tiles, solar shingles, solar energy device, homeowners association, HOA, property owners' association, POA, renewable energy, residential solar, distributed solar, roof-mounted solar, homeowner rights, architectural control, open meetings, public notice, transparency, government efficiency

Transcript Highlights:

• And I think that it would be an incredible opportunity to bring it here.
• Um, as written, the bill creates great opportunity.
• My one concern is not with opportunity.
• Digital transactions are covered under this, and we had received strong support for the bill.
• :12.719><c> under</c> Digital transactions are covered under Digital transactions are covered under this

Bills: HB0120, HB0043, HB0128

Keywords: energy production, natural gas, industrial sovereignty, manufacturing, tax exemptions, money laundering, illegal investment, financial institutions, criminal activity, Wyoming legislation, severance tax, oil production, tax exemption, energy sector, economic impact, 916, all

Transcript Highlights:

• I'm grateful for the opportunity to briefly present House Bill 2318, which is aligned with House Bill
• So I want to thank you, Chair Stinnett, for the opportunity to present this bill and for the committee's
• Like, they have opportunity zones. They have, like, health care zones. So stuff like that as well.
• There were other states who had something called, like, health care zones or opportunity zones.
• I appreciate the opportunity to speak in support of a bill in front of this committee this year.

Keywords: 959, house, all

Transcript Highlights:

• The UK has a tax on digital services.
• Chair, firstly, again, thank you for the opportunity to present to the committee.
• Good morning, everyone, and thank you very much for the opportunity to be here.
• Good afternoon and thanks for the opportunity to speak. My name is Victor Lagoonis.
• Good afternoon and thanks for the opportunity to speak. My name is Victor Lagoonis.

Summary: The joint informational hearing focused on California’s taxation of foreign subsidiaries of U.S. corporations, especially the state’s water’s-edge election versus worldwide combined reporting. Committee members and witnesses discussed how unitary taxation and sales-factor apportionment work, why multinational corporations are a small share of filers but a large share of tax liability, and how foreign income, profit shifting, and double taxation concerns affect policy choices. The Franchise Tax Board explained current filing rules, the seven-year water’s-edge election, and recent filing statistics showing about 21,562 water’s-edge returns in 2023, roughly 6% of C corporation filers but about half of corporate tax liability. The Legislative Analyst’s Office and FTB staff emphasized that revenue effects from eliminating water’s edge are uncertain because foreign affiliate income is not directly observable, and they noted possible revenue volatility and administrative complexity. Several committee members asked about foreign government pushback, the burden on FTB, whether certain industries are more likely to shift profits, and whether companies would leave California; witnesses generally said there was no strong evidence that firms would exit the state because tax liability is driven mainly by California sales. They also discussed how California already administers both methods, how the election can be advantageous or disadvantageous depending on a firm’s facts, and how federal reforms like GILTI/NCTI, CAMT, and OECD Pillar Two may affect the issue. The second panel presented sharply contrasting views. One professor and a tax policy advocate argued that water’s edge creates unfairness, encourages profit shifting, and leaves California with billions in lost revenue, while a Tax Foundation witness argued that mandatory worldwide reporting would tax the wrong income, create double taxation and litigation risk, and impose heavy compliance burdens, especially for foreign-based multinationals. A later panel from the California Budget and Policy Center supported closing the “water’s-edge loophole,” saying it would raise needed revenue for public services and level the playing field between large multinationals and smaller domestic businesses. No vote or formal action was taken; the hearing was informational only.

Transcript Highlights:

• THERE IS AN AMENDMENT HE WILL GET ANOTHER OPPORTUNITY. WE DO HAVE AN AMENDMENT.
• DO THEY GET HARD COPIES SENT TO THEM OR AN EMAIL OR A DIGITAL NOTICE?
• THERE IS AN OPPORTUNITY WE HAVE TO GO BACK AND FIX THIS PROBLEM TO ALLOW AN OPPORTUNITY FOR COMMUNITY
• THANK YOU FOR THE OPPORTUNITY TO SPEAK.
• I'M GOING TO VOTE FOR IT TODAY BECAUSE I GET ANOTHER OPPORTUNITY TO SEE IT.

Keywords: 999, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• Grateful for the opportunity to serve on Assembly Budget Subcommittee 1 with our great subcommittee chair
• a space that I will always be proud to uplift in conversation because higher ed has given me an opportunity
• I think this is a missed opportunity.
• You had the opportunity to come at any moment over the past several months and make this point.
• We'd welcome the opportunity to work with the Legislature and the administration to ensure this structure

Keywords: 988, house, all

Transcript Highlights:

• And we'd like to thank you for the opportunity to be here today to testify.
• I mean, the opportunity to prevent that harm may already be gone.
• Being 86 in the digital world, I may not have done it correctly.
• I agree, because on my digital list, you're not there.
• for testimony and an insufficient opportunity for debate, our Rule 27 actually affords you the opportunity

Keywords: 989, all

Summary: The committee continued testimony on House Bill 864, which would schedule kratom as a Schedule I substance. Testimony was sharply divided. Supporters included family members of people who died after using kratom, police representatives, a physician who said kratom is an addictive opioid-like substance, and the bill sponsors, who argued that kratom and related compounds can cause addiction, withdrawal, overdose, and death and that a ban is needed to protect public health. Opponents included convenience store and kratom industry representatives, a veteran and other users who said kratom helped them manage pain or avoid opioids, and the American Kratom Association, which argued that the bill conflates natural kratom leaf with synthetic derivatives such as 7-OH and that regulation, not prohibition, is the better approach. The committee ultimately adopted a motion to hold HB 864 to a time certain of March 25 by a roll call vote of 11-5. The committee then took up House Bill 903, a SNAP-related bill clarifying which food items can be purchased with benefits. The sponsor explained that the bill was intended to clean up the earlier SNAP waiver language and remove items such as cookies, cakes, brownies, sprinkles, chips, and snack bars from the list of allowable purchases, while keeping more nutritious items and certain bars. Retailers testified in support, saying the changes would reduce confusion and improve consistency. After discussion over the process and the proposed changes, a motion to hold the bill failed, and the committee voted to send HB 903 to the floor with a due pass recommendation. The final item introduced was House Bill 757, which the sponsor said would define medical neglect in Idaho law and create protections for parents and guardians from false or bad-faith reports. The bill would narrow medical neglect to life-threatening conditions and include exemptions for reasonable efforts to obtain care, medically complex situations, and alternative treatments. No action was taken on HB 757 in the portion provided.

Transcript Highlights:

• The next two agencies, the Idaho Digital Learning Academy and the Idaho Educational Services for the
• Thank you for the opportunity. Mr.
• The other area that we're looking at updating would be around digital content and curriculum.
• A couple of quick notes related to other funding streams or funding opportunities that our schools have
• SDE has applied this rescission to funding that is otherwise used for advanced opportunities payments

Keywords: 989, all

Summary: The committee heard a lengthy presentation on the K-12 public school support budget, including how support units, career ladder funding, health insurance, discretionary funding, transportation, facilities, and the Public Education Stabilization Fund (PSIF) work. Legislative Services explained that FY 2026 support units were revised downward, creating a $22.3 million ongoing general fund reduction, and walked through the FY 2027 agency request and governor’s recommendation. The governor recommended no increase for population forecast adjustments, but did recommend some statutory and policy changes, including shifting certain interest earnings to the general fund and reducing funding for some virtual school and IDLA-related items. The agency request also included one-time proposals for a high-needs special education fund and a regional service model for related services. Members asked extensive questions about how career ladder dollars are distributed, how health insurance and discretionary funds interact, why the health insurance increase in the budget differed from current plan estimates, and how facilities money under House Bill 292 is used. There were also questions about the size and use of the Idaho Career Ready Students fund, the maintenance-of-effort implications of special education funding, and whether some special education costs are being used for student housing or other noninstructional expenses. The superintendent and budget staff emphasized that many of the budget lines are formula-driven or statutorily required, that local districts determine actual staffing and spending within those formulas, and that special education costs continue to outpace available funding. Superintendent Debbie Critchfield then framed the budget request around enrollment trends, shifting demographics, and the need for more flexibility in how districts use existing dollars. She highlighted proposed categorical flexibility for some funds, changes to digital content and curriculum distribution, continued literacy gains, growth in career technical education programs funded through Idaho Career Ready Students, and the importance of endowment and Millennium Fund support. She also described the special education proposals as a temporary bridge while the state considers larger formula changes and noted a near $100 million gap between special education spending and funding. She further outlined planned federal waiver requests on assessments and flexibility, and said the department is seeking more state control over testing and reporting requirements. The committee did not take final action on the budget during this portion of the meeting. Members raised concerns about interest transfers from dedicated funds, the complexity of the funding formula, special education accountability, and whether the state should revisit the overall school funding model. Several follow-up data requests were made, including information on health insurance participation, regional special education service needs, and school contingency fund balances.

Transcript Highlights:

• But we still go for it because it's still funding opportunities.
• I'm really thankful for the funding opportunity and what it does provide.
• We disseminate those to the tribal leadership whenever we have an opportunity.
• I think the latest opportunity was at the state tribal summit.
• It's good to know that you've had the opportunity to address this as well.

Transcript Highlights:

• That bill amends Idaho Code to revise policy regarding the Idaho Digital Learning Academy.
• Idaho Digital Learning Academy.

Keywords: 989, all

Summary: The Joint Finance and Corporation Committee met with a quorum from both chambers and first approved a $6.5 million federal supplemental appropriation for the Military Division to replace failing climate control systems in Idaho Air National Guard buildings at Gowen Field. The committee then considered Idaho State Police funding tied to three revenue measures: a beer excise tax distribution change, a new specialty license plate, and a liquor account distribution change. Members discussed the impact on cities and counties, with several noting the shift away from local governments, but the motion to appropriate $6.695 million in dedicated and federal funds for ISP personnel costs passed and received a do-pass recommendation. The committee next took up two pieces of language related to Idaho Digital Learning Academy. One trailer language item tied to House Bill 940, which would change course fee limits for non-graduation and graduation-required courses, was adopted by unanimous consent. A second proposal to restore IDLA’s access to PSIF after a large appropriation reduction failed after members raised concerns about allowing access before the academy spent down its cash balance and about weakening the budget cap. Members then approved language redirecting about $12 million from the Strategic Initiatives Fund to the local highway distribution formula instead of LTAC grants, after debate over whether formula-based distribution or competitive grants better served local needs. Finally, the committee adopted language preventing an automatic transfer from the Budget Stabilization Fund to the General Fund when the fund exceeds its 15% cap, preserving the fund balance unless the legislature acts otherwise. The meeting adjourned after the final do-pass recommendation was approved.

Transcript Highlights:

• H593 was referred to Energy and Digital Infrastructure.
• H597, H598, H599, H600, and H601 were referred to Energy and Digital Infrastructure.

Keywords: 926, house, all

Transcript Highlights:

• This allows digitized identification cards to be accepted as a valid form of identification under certain
• circumstances and authorizes state and county law enforcement agencies to accept a digitized identification

Keywords: 912, senate, all

Summary: The Judiciary Committee met on a decision-making agenda and took up a series of bills, mostly accepting committee recommendations with either technical or substantive amendments. HB 472 would allow digitized identification cards to be accepted as valid ID under certain circumstances; the committee amended it to clarify that a physical ID may still be required where state or federal law demands it, and the measure passed. HB 510 on water shortages and emergencies, HB 871 on the effective date of Act 130 relating to the Hawaiian Homes Commission Act, HB 1120 on the Department of Health’s nuisance-abatement authority, and HB 1162 on motorcycle instruction permits all passed with amendments or technical changes. HB 544 establishing a pet insurance framework, HB 995 extending reporting time for firearm carry license reports, HB 10002 extending the White Correctional Oversight Commission coordinator term, HB 1093 clarifying the Hawaii Public Housing Authority’s powers, HB 1291 expanding labeling rules for winged brown coffee to roasted coffee, and HB 1348 on public-land recreation leases and county-resident lotteries also passed, with HB 1348 amended to require a lottery within a year of vacancy and to limit renewal conditions. The committee also discussed HB 76, requiring skateboard users under 16 to wear helmets, and HB 1259, which would change how speed limits can be reduced without an engineering study. One member raised concerns about HB 1259, arguing the language could allow unsafe reductions on state highways; the committee noted a no vote from that member, but the measure still passed. HB 76 initially passed as amended, then the committee briefly revisited it after a member said they had intended to vote no; on revote, the bill was adopted unamended. Throughout the meeting, members generally voiced no objections to the remaining measures, and each bill was reported out with the stated recommendation.

Transcript Highlights:

• In creating this committee, Massachusetts has an opportunity to be not just a leader in the state's census
• it's a small share of the population and the data have historically been shared, that may be an opportunity
• it's a small share of the population and the data have historically been shared, that may be an opportunity
• past, there’s that information that was collected by the interviewer or on the paper form that was digitized
• If you are using, you know, a digital assistant in your house, that is a way that those big tech companies

Summary: The hearing focused on census data privacy, administrative data sharing, and the role of state and local governments in improving census accuracy, especially for the 2030 census. Dr. Philip Rocco testified first, arguing that the census is increasingly intergovernmental and that state and local investments in address list work, outreach, and complete count commissions can materially improve self-response and reduce undercounts. He emphasized that hard-to-count communities are most affected when states delay planning, politicize census work, or lack capacity, and he pointed to examples such as LUCA participation, outreach funding, and group quarters review as important tools. He also warned that recent federal actions and a broader climate of distrust could threaten 2030 operations, and urged Massachusetts to begin readiness planning now. Members then questioned Dr. Rocco about the use of administrative data such as DMV, TANF, SNAP, and WIC records, and about group quarters enumeration. He explained that those data-sharing efforts were voluntary agreements with the Census Bureau, unlike group quarters data, which are often provided by facility administrators and sometimes state agencies. He said the Trump-era effort to use DMV and other records was tied to Executive Order 13880 and was widely resisted because states had confidentiality and legal concerns, and because the stated purpose appeared to shift toward citizenship-related uses. On group quarters, he described e-response, paper response, in-person enumeration, and administrator-provided directory information, noting that privacy issues arise mainly from FERPA limits on university data and from missing demographic details in administrative records. A second panel, Beth Giroz and Amy O'Hara, then explained how administrative data are used by the Census Bureau and why data quality and privacy concerns matter. They described administrative data as records collected for operational purposes, useful for frame-building, nonresponse follow-up, enumeration, and post-enumeration evaluation, but often incomplete or mismatched on key census variables such as race, ethnicity, household relationships, and residence timing. They highlighted that some sources, like IRS, Medicare, USPS, SSA, and Bureau of Prisons records, are especially valuable, while others such as SNAP, TANF, WIC, Medicaid, CHIP, foster care, and driver’s license data vary in completeness and sharing. They stressed that privacy means collecting only what is needed, and that the Bureau typically uses limited header or roster data rather than full records. No votes or formal actions were taken during the hearing, and the committee recessed briefly before continuing testimony.

Transcript Highlights:

• In creating this committee, Massachusetts has an opportunity to be not just a leader in the state's census
• it's a small share of the population and the data have historically been shared, that may be an opportunity
• it's a small share of the population and the data have historically been shared, that may be an opportunity
• past, there's that information that was collected by the interviewer or on the paper form that was digitized
• If you are using, you know, a digital assistant in your house, that is a way that those big tech companies

Keywords: 1212, all

Transcript Highlights:

• It is a structured and intentional opportunity.
• This is a structured and intentional opportunity to apply what we have already seen work in Louisiana
• We have the opportunity to further look at this through a study and not through a change in law.
• So we would respectfully ask that you reject this bill as amended and that we have the opportunity to
• Yeah, and I think that that may give people an opportunity to read your amendments as well.

Keywords: 974, senate, all