Transcript Highlights:

• I URGE MY COLLEAGUES TO SUPPORT THIS COMMONSENSE, BIPARTISAN I urge my colleagues to support this commonsense
• I urge my colleagues to support both these bills and to support H.R. 832, and stand with America and
• Speaker, I rise to support H.R. 788.
• As we continue to support our small businesses, it will support the nation's job creators.
• and the support that they deserve.

Keywords: U.S. House of Representatives Floor Proceedings on Monday, February 24, 2025, 1012, house, all

Transcript Highlights:

• I rise in support<02:26:16.880> of<02:26:17.120> HR198 support of HR198 support of HR198
• adjacent military support airport. adjacent military support airport.
• Chairman, for your steadfast support and to the ranking member as well for his support.
• And I support this bill, Mr.
• his comments and support of the bill. his comments and support of the bill.

Keywords: U.S. House of Representatives Floor Proceedings on Monday, June 23, 2025, 1012, house, all

Transcript Highlights:

• Daniel Malone waves in support. Craig Belcher waves in support. Drew Love waves in support.
• Sam Wagner waves in support, and Courtney Mooney waves in support. Thank you.
• Aaron DePetro waves in support. Sam Wagner waving in support.
• Paul Handerhan, waving in support. Thank you, Mr. Chair. Jason Main, waving in support.
• Paul Handerhan, waving in support. Thank you, Mr. Chair. Jason Main, waving in support.

Summary: The committee met with a quorum present and heard a series of bills, mostly local claims and growth-management or permitting measures. SB 16, SB 14, and SB 24 were uncontested claims bills providing relief for injuries or damages involving the City of St. Petersburg and Miami-Dade County; each was described as settled or favorably reported by a special master, and each was reported favorably without debate. SB 288, a negotiated bill on rural electric cooperatives, was presented as a clarification to protect co-op authority over generation and power purchases while preserving consumer protections; it drew support from industry stakeholders and was reported favorably. SB 830 created a public-records exemption for certain local administrators and their families’ personal information, citing threats against city managers, and it also passed favorably. The committee also considered several land-use and permitting bills. SB 1138 would create a registry of qualified professionals to conduct pre-application review for plats and development, aiming to reduce delays and backlogs; local government groups raised concerns about preemption and preserving quasi-judicial authority, but the bill passed favorably with one no vote. SB 168 expanded public nuisance law to include gambling houses, increased penalties, and authorized attorney’s fees and foreclosure of unpaid fees; it was reported favorably. SB 686 revised the agricultural enclave statute to create a public-hearing process for certain residential projects in urban service areas, with a sunset date later amended to June 30, 2026; conservation and planning groups raised concerns about local planning authority and public participation, but the bill passed favorably. SB 548, a growth-management and impact-fee cleanup bill, clarified plan-based methodology, extraordinary circumstances, interlocal agreements, and refund procedures for impact fees. Local government and development stakeholders testified that it would improve predictability while preserving flexibility, though some sought further refinement on fee increases and refunds; the bill was amended and then reported favorably. SB 1234 addressed building permits and inspections, including permit validity, small-project exemptions, temporary hurricane protection, standardized permit forms, and expanded use of private providers; county officials objected to reduced oversight, while builders and private-provider advocates supported the measure. After testimony and debate, the bill was reported favorably. At the end of the meeting, Senator Jones requested to be recorded on several votes, and the committee adjourned after no further business.

Transcript Highlights:

• Okay, so we'll go to support.
• as they need to be supported.
• ...wish to speak in support.
• I support this bill.
• Chair, I support your bill.

Transcript Highlights:

• MDE's implementation support MDE's implementation support funding.<00:09:07.839> On<00:09
• distribution of the student support distribution of the student support personnel<00:14:39.600><
• We support mentors in schools.
• We support mentors in schools.
• So please consider your support of us in the future. We support mentors in schools.

Keywords: 1187, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• One is for CSPP auditing support.
• That kind of support.
• long-term services and supports system.
• Two supported it, and 24 did not offer any feedback.
• Thank you very much for your continued support.

Summary: The Assembly Budget Subcommittee on Human Services held a hearing on the Governor’s May Revision, with no votes taken. The first major topic was child care and early education, where the Department of Social Services and Department of Finance outlined proposed changes to absorb federal Child Care and Development Fund and Proposition 64 revenue reductions, shift some funding between child care programs, end funding for prospective pay implementation now that the federal requirement has been rescinded, adjust the alternative payment administration structure, and fund child care infrastructure grants and a Low-Income Investment Fund contract closeout. The Legislative Analyst’s Office said the budget makes progress on the structural deficit but recommended maintaining the administration’s solution level, making reserve deposits, and avoiding new ongoing commitments; it also raised concerns about shifting reductions to the California Alternative Payment Program and about the proposed administrative-rate change. Committee members strongly criticized the proposed loss of child care slots and said they would oppose eliminating those slots, while also expressing support for child care as essential infrastructure. The committee then reviewed California State Preschool Program proposals. Finance and CDE described reductions to the preschool COLA from 2.41% to 2.01%, removal of prospective pay funding, and increases for the QRIS block grant, audit support, and rate reform implementation. Trailer bill language would codify age-based rate categories, inclusion-rate documentation, family fee collection rules, portability, and excused absences. CDE supported the QRIS increase and some attendance and family-fee changes, but warned that aligning three- and four-year-old rates could reduce support for three-year-olds and that the budget does not fully cover enrollment growth. Members also questioned whether the preschool and child care slot reductions should be reallocated rather than terminated, and the administration said the reductions were intended to reflect current utilization and avoid harm to currently enrolled families. The hearing then moved to CalFresh and nutrition programs. CDSS said the May Revision includes a one-time CalFood augmentation, funding to cover federal SNAP administrative cost-share pressures, and additional staffing and technical assistance to implement HR 1 changes, including the able-bodied adults without dependents time limit and new non-citizen eligibility rules. The department estimated HR 1 could cut CalFresh funding by $2.3 billion to $3.7 billion annually and affect about 500,000 people, with roughly 806,000 adults potentially subject to the time limit and about 34,000 non-citizens expected to lose eligibility once fully implemented. Members pressed for stronger harm mitigation, including a $98 million backfill to protect families from losing food benefits, and raised concerns about county workload and the “chilling effect” on immigrant participation. The final portion of the transcript began the IHSS presentation, noting a revised budget of $33.7 billion total funds and $12.8 billion General Fund, with proposed reductions tied to Medi-Cal asset-limit changes and other federal conformity items.

Transcript Highlights:

• It's in support of SJR 12.
• Environmental Voters is proud to be here in support of SB 10 today because this bill supports California's
• Anybody in support of this measure? Absolutely. Anybody in support of this measure?
• I'm here today in strong support of SB 675.
• I'm here today in strong support of SB 675.

Keywords: 988, house, all

Transcript Highlights:

• you support this bill.
• We do support composting.
• We do support composting.
• Anyone online to support? We have two online to support.
• I support that; it's in my district, and I support the opportunity to maybe have new jobs.

Bills: SB47, SB110, SB122, SB143, SB168

Keywords: food recovery, composting, waste management, solid waste surcharge, organic waste reduction, environment, grants, advisory group, bosque management, Rio Grande, environmental protection, water resources, fiscal appropriation, drinking water, well owners, water testing, water treatment, public health, agriculture, New Mexico Department of Agriculture

Transcript Highlights:

• We support this measure.
• DNR in support.
• Malama Pu‘u Ma in support.
• Um, County of Hawaii Mayor's Office in support. HCDA in support.
• County of Hawaii Mayor's Office in support. HCDA in support.

Keywords: 910, house, all

Summary: The committee heard testimony on several agriculture, water, invasive species, and land-use bills. HB 299 and HB 1220, both relating to invasive species, drew broad support from the Hawaii Invasive Species Council, DLNR, the Department of Agriculture, C-GAPS, Sierra Club, Hawaii Farm Bureau, Hawaii Farmers Union, and others. Testifiers said HISC funding fills gaps between agency mandates, supports research and technology, and helps respond to both terrestrial and marine invasive threats. On HB 1220, C-GAPS described a marine anemone infestation in Kāneʻohe linked to aquarium release and said control and restoration would be difficult without the bill’s funding. A committee member asked for tracking information on the species, and the Division of Aquatic Resources said it maintains monitoring data and annual reports. No opposition was noted on either measure. HB 506, relating to conservation enforcement, also received support from DLNR and Malama Pu‘u Ma. Committee discussion focused on the bill’s scope and how the funding would be used. Members asked about a prior boat purchase mentioned in opposition testimony and about whether mainland vendors were being used; the department said it did not buy that boat and that procurement follows the normal state process, with total bid price including delivery, taxes, and other fees. The department explained that the bill’s funding is primarily for marine enforcement work in nearshore fisheries, including herbivore protection around O‘ahu. HB 915, relating to water use, had mixed testimony. DLNR supported alternative water sources and amendments to the water code, while the Department of Agriculture opposed the bill as drafted, saying its irrigation program is designed for non-potable agricultural use and is not structured for residential or mixed-use development. The Department of Health said it needed more information on its reuse guidelines and noted concern about removing the recycled water manager requirement, which it said helps ensure safe operation and maintenance of reuse systems. Members questioned the bill’s preemption language and whether county or state rules would be displaced, and Agriculture suggested county water agencies might be better suited for some of the proposed uses. HB 502, concerning land use, drew support from the Attorney General’s office, the Land Use Commission, Hawaii Realtors, Hawaii Farm Bureau, and Hawaii Farmers Union, with the Department of Agriculture standing on its written testimony. The Attorney General warned that allowing important agricultural lands to be redistricted through a declaratory ruling process could conflict with the state constitution and recommended excluding IAL from the bill. The Land Use Commission said it has an inventory of IAL lands and did not believe the bill would affect them, and it agreed to the suggested protection. Supporters said the bill could help move lands with limited agricultural value into the rural district, reduce pressure on productive farmland, and better align land use with actual farming potential. HB 929, relating to the agricultural land conveyance tax, received comments from the Department of Taxation and opposition from Hawaii Farm Bureau and Hawaii Realtors; Farm Bureau said it supports preserving agricultural land but was concerned about unintended consequences and questioned whether speculative flipping of ag land is a current problem.

Transcript Highlights:

• This bill has bipartisan support.
• This bill has bipartisan support.
• That's why I'm supporting this measure.
• That's why I'm supporting this measure.
• .and in extremely strong support, and I ask everyone to step up and meet this moment by supporting AB

Keywords: 988, house, all

Transcript Highlights:

• Any more witnesses in support? Okay. Any others who would like to speak in support of SB 983?
• Any more witnesses in support? Okay. Any others who would like me to in support of SB 983?
• Any other key witness in support? Okay. Anyone in support of SB 1256 as a me too? Thank you.
• I will support the bill. I think this bill makes sense. I will support the bill. Thank you.
• Okay, are there any me-too supporters? Okay, are there any me-too supporters? Opposition?

Summary: The Senate Committee on Local Government met to hear a long agenda of local government, housing, labor, and transparency bills. The committee first adopted the consent calendar for SB 1187 and SB 1388, then heard SB 983, which would authorize the Port of San Diego to use job order contracting for repairs and repetitive maintenance work. Supporters said the bill would speed emergency and small repairs and reduce costs, while opponents raised concerns about construction definitions and project labor agreement language. The bill was ultimately moved forward on a 2-2 vote after discussion of amendments and labor negotiations, and later the committee’s final roll call showed it passing out on a 5-2 vote. The committee also heard SB 1256, aimed at limiting duplicative litigation over a San Diego County housing project, and SB 992, which would make permanent and expand a small special-district audit flexibility by raising the revenue threshold from $150,000 to $250,000. SB 1256 drew support from the author and project counsel, who argued the project had already been litigated and was delaying needed housing, while opponents said the bill would interfere with wildfire and subdivision-map review. SB 992 had support from county auditors and special districts, with no opposition, and was approved 5-0. SB 1115, addressing governance failures at the Tulare County Public Cemetery District by allowing county supervisors to remove an individual trustee for cause, also passed unanimously after testimony describing serious dysfunction and opposition from the California Special Districts Association. The committee then took up SB 1193, which would impose transparency and approval requirements on Alameda County discretionary funding to nonprofits and other entities. The author and supporters described the bill as a response to grand jury findings and alleged conflicts of interest, while Alameda County argued its current process is already transparent and that the bill would add burdens and could harm services. After amendments and discussion, the bill passed 5-0. SB 1383, a density bonus law bill clarifying that local labor standards cannot be waived through density bonus concessions, was supported by labor groups and moved forward despite no opposition, with the final roll call showing it passing out 5-1. SB 1361, intended to prevent local governments from undermining transit projects because of SB 79 density concerns, also passed after support from L.A. Metro and labor and no formal opposition, with the final vote recorded as 5-2. The committee later resumed to hear SB 1272, the CASH Act, which would limit certain sanctions on homeowners for prior unpermitted work by previous owners; the transcript cuts off before that bill’s full testimony and vote.

Transcript Highlights:

• We also support cyber intel sharing with the BCA Fusion Center.
• And they, of course, can support any agency that requests Guard activation support.
• And they, of course, can support any agency that requests Guard activation support.
• And we also provided operational support.
• Not too technical, but what does support mean in that space?

Keywords: 918, senate, all

Summary: The Minnesota Senate Subcommittee on Veterans heard a Department of Military Affairs presentation on bonding, tuition benefits, and cyber response. The department requested $3.5 million in design funding for a new hangar at the 148th Fighter Wing in Duluth, citing safety problems with the aging 1950s-era hangars and the need to improve the wing’s competitiveness for future federal military construction funding. It also sought $2.5 million for asset preservation at Army facilities statewide, emphasizing that state dollars are often matched by federal funds. A National Guard lieutenant also testified about the State Tuition Reimbursement Program, describing how it helped pay for her undergraduate and doctoral education and reduce student debt. The committee also received an update on Minnesota National Guard cyber operations, including the response to the July 2025 ransomware attack on the City of Saint Paul. Testimony described the cyber coordination cell’s role in planning, interagency coordination, and support during the incident, including helping re-image about 500 computers and assisting with network recovery. Members heard that the Guard’s cyber teams conduct extensive partner engagement and are prepared to support state and local entities when civil resources are exhausted and the incident exceeds local capacity. Three bills were then heard and advanced. Senate File 4075, as amended, would implement recommendations from the task force on Special Guerrilla Unit and regular forces veterans from the Secret War in Laos, including eligibility and benefit changes; the committee adopted an amendment and passed the bill to the full committee. Senate File 3956, as amended, would clarify that the Department of Veterans Affairs may partner with veteran-serving organizations using nonmonetary resources to address food insecurity, homelessness, and suicide prevention; it was also referred onward. Senate File 4056, as amended, would add veteran or military status as a protected class under the Minnesota Human Rights Act; testimony supported the change, including concerns about service members losing educational opportunities while on state active duty, and the bill was passed to the full committee.

Transcript Highlights:

• legislature and while supported legislature and while supported decision-making<00:02:37.360>
• For many families, a supported.
• I would ask for your support. good bill. I would ask for your support.
• And I'm here in strong support<00:23:38.640> of support of support of HF1861<00:23:40.840>
• committee support. Thank you very much. committee support. Thank you very much.

Keywords: 1183, house

Transcript Highlights:

• We are grateful for the support of the 88th.
• state support would need to be funded by tuition.
• We are grateful for your support.
• We're also requesting support of two facility projects to support our technical program expansions.
• This is due in large part to your continued support of LIT that support resulted in further of our tuition

Keywords: 1184, house, all

Transcript Highlights:

• that we want to support.
• would support them.
• LGBTIQ+ young people, particularly those without family support or supportive schools, are more likely
• LGBTI young people, particularly those without family support, supportive schools, are more likely to
• CBHA supports the efforts to make online spaces safer for young people, and we support stronger safeguards

Keywords: 988, house, all

Transcript Highlights:

• I am looking, I support this, I support the film tax credit because I don't want my industry that I grew
• Thank you for your continued support.
• For these reasons, we strongly support the film. and we support the increase. Thank you. Thank you.
• Strong support.
• So, we ask that you support and that everyone supports the tax incentive for the film industry.

Keywords: 988, house, all

Transcript Highlights:

• We are proud to support them. We have supported them, as they said, for almost 44 years.
• I'd appreciate your support on it.
• We have William Smith, Board of PBA, waiving in support.
• We have Hunter Flagg waving in support of the bill.
• We have Hunter Flagg waving in support of the bill.

Summary: The Committee on Fiscal Policy met and considered a wide range of bills, including early learning and special needs funding (SB 1102), Israel bond investment authority (SB 1674), Parkinson’s disease research at USF (SB 1800), mental health and substance use disorder reforms (SB 1620), veterans nursing home beds (SB 788), securities regulation updates (SB 988), labor pool regulation (SB 1672), Alzheimer’s awareness (SB 398), educator preparation (SB 1590), student mental health reporting (SB 1310), specialty license plates (SB 824), financial institutions and IOTA-related issues (SB 1612), transportation facility designations (SB 1408), utility worker protections (SB 1386), DNA testing grants (SB 1072), the Council on the Social Status of Black Men and Boys (SB 364), housing support for former foster youth and homeless students (SB 584), sex offender registration changes (SB 1654), migrant vessel disposal (SB 830), commuter rail indemnification (SB 916), juvenile justice revisions (SB 1344), aggravating factors in capital cases (SB 984), and a criminal offender substance abuse pilot program (SB 1140). Most bills were explained by sponsors, often with supportive testimony from affected agencies, advocacy groups, or industry representatives, and several were amended before final action. The committee adopted amendments on many measures, including clarifications and effective-date changes for SB 1102; technical changes to SB 1620 implementing mental health commission recommendations; a delete-all amendment for SB 1620; an amendment to SB 988; a consumer-disclosure amendment on SB 1612; and multiple amendments to SB 1408, SB 364, SB 584, SB 1654, and SB 1344. SB 1672 on the Labor Pool Act drew extensive public testimony in opposition from worker advocates, who argued repeal would weaken protections for temp workers and formerly incarcerated workers, and the bill was temporarily postponed to a later meeting without a vote. Several bills received notable testimony in support, including SB 584, where former foster youth described housing instability and the importance of campus housing and federal voucher coordination; SB 1386, which was backed by utility and industry groups seeking stronger penalties for assaults on utility workers; and SB 984, which drew opposition from the Florida Conference of Catholic Bishops over expansion of death penalty aggravators. The committee also heard support and opposition on SB 1612 regarding IOTA interest rates and legal aid funding, with bankers and civil legal aid representatives disputing the proper rate structure and whether the bill conflicted with Florida Bar rules. At the end of the meeting, the committee reported all voted-on bills favorably, including SB 1102, SB 1674, SB 1800, SB 1620, SB 788, SB 988, SB 398, SB 1590, SB 1310, SB 824, SB 1612, SB 1408, SB 1386, SB 1072, SB 364, SB 584, SB 1654, SB 830, SB 916, SB 1344, SB 984, and SB 1140. Members also requested to be recorded on various bills, and the committee adjourned after noting one remaining meeting would be lengthy.

Transcript Highlights:

• completion grants that will support completion grants that will support nonprofits<00:01:48.360>
• develop targeted strategies to support develop targeted strategies to support low-income<00:02:03.240
• systems additionally continued support systems additionally continued support for<00:02:23.360><
• <00:03:58.879> for for increased funding our support for for increased funding our support
• <00:15:25.279> of $50,000 would be supportive of $50,000 would be supportive of supporting

Keywords: 1183, house

Transcript Highlights:

• AND SUPPORT, CASSANDRA URBAN WAIVING IN SUPPORT, CHERYL PERSON, SCHOOL DISTRICT IN SUPPORT, STEPHANIE
• LORI COX WAIVING IN SUPPORT, CHRISTINA HOULIHAN IN SUPPORT, JESSICA MABRY IN SUPPORT.
• JUSTIN SHARP, WAIVING AND SUPPORT. CIVIL FROST WAIVING IN SUPPORT.
• LISA IN SUPPORT, SCOTT TURNER IN SUPPORT, DELLA ABBOTT IN SUPPORT, SAM FISHER LEE COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT
• ANTHONY RICARDO IN SUPPORT. SALLY'S LETTER, WAIVING AND SUPPORT.

Keywords: 999, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• and I urge my colleagues to support it. and I urge my colleagues to support it.
• Speaker, I support and rise in support of H.R. 1263.
• I rise in support of Speaker, I support I rise in support of HR<04:06:21.720> 1263.
• <04:27:43.040> the support HR 217 and and support the support HR 217 and and support the legislation
• PVA for supporting this bill. I also PVA for supporting this bill.

Keywords: U.S. House of Representatives Floor Proceedings on Monday, May 19, 2025, 1012, house, all