Video & Transcript : 'judiciary compensation' :

Page 166 of 488
MA

Massachusetts 2025-2026 Regular Session

Informal House Session 48 Jun 21st, 2026 at 11:00 am

Massachusetts House Floor Meeting

Transcript Highlights:
  • Day of Stoneham moves that the petition be referred in non-concurrence to the Committee on Judiciary.
  • The petition will be referred in non-concurrence to the Committee on Judiciary. Mr.
Summary: The House opened with the Pledge of Allegiance and then took up committee reports recommending suspension of Joint Rule 12 for two House petitions from Colleen M. Garry: one to establish an opt-out admissions lottery process for charter schools, referred to the Committee on Education, and another concerning income tax deductions for certain school expenses, referred to the Committee on Revenue. The House approved the suspensions and then recessed subject to the call of the Chair. The House later received a Senate petition filed by Cindy F. Friedman and Andrea Joy Campbell to strengthen health care protections in the Commonwealth. The House concurred in suspending Joint Rule 12 for the petition, but on motion of Mr. Day it was referred in non-concurrence to the Committee on Judiciary rather than the Committee on Health Care Financing. The House then adopted an order setting its next meeting for Thursday at 11 a.m. and adjourned to meet then in an informal session.
MN

Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session

House Public Safety Finance and Policy Committee 3/4/26

Public Safety Finance and Policy

Transcript Highlights:
  • </c> Judiciary, Finance, and Civil Law? Judiciary, Finance, and Civil Law?
  • The D3 amendment represents judiciary.
  • Motion carries and House File 962, as amended, is re-referred to Judiciary.
  • </c> amended is re-referred to the judiciary amended is re-referred to the judiciary committee.<00:32
  • </c> amended is re-referred to judiciary. amended is re-referred to judiciary.
Bills: HF962 , HF3541 , HF2936 , HF3762 , HF2879
CA

California 2025-2026 Regular Session

Assembly Insurance Committee Apr 2nd, 2025

Insurance

Transcript Highlights:
  • workers' compensation, is about $8 per payroll.
  • It's a good thing for the cost of workers' compensation.
  • workers' compensation, is about $8 per payroll.
  • It's a good thing for the cost of workers' compensation.
  • It's a good thing for the cost of workers' compensation.
Committee: House Insurance
Summary: The Assembly Insurance Committee met as a subcommittee and heard several bills focused on insurance transparency, wildfire mitigation, access to coverage, and workforce issues. AB 75 would require insurers to give homeowners 30 days’ notice before collecting aerial images of their property and allow homeowners to review those images; supporters framed it as a privacy and consumer protection measure, while consumer advocates and insurers sought amendments to strengthen access and clarify coverage. The committee also heard AB 234, which would add the Assembly Speaker and Senate pro tem, or their designees, as nonvoting members of the California FAIR Plan governing committee; supporters said it would improve oversight, while opponents argued it was only a small transparency step and more reform was needed. Both bills were advanced, with AB 75 sent to Privacy and Consumer Protection and AB 234 sent to the Assembly Floor. Members also heard AB 428, which would allow water corporations to participate in joint powers authorities for pooled insurance purposes, with testimony from small water utilities describing steep premium increases and the need to reduce costs. The bill was supported by water industry and labor groups and passed to Local Government. The consent calendar included AB 69, AB 487, and AB 570, all sent to Appropriations. AB 943 would streamline producer pre-licensing education requirements by removing the 20-hour per-line mandate while keeping ethics training; industry sponsors said it would reduce barriers to entry, while consumer advocates warned it could lower professional standards. The committee approved AB 943 to Appropriations. AB 1209 would create a pathway for cannabis employers to secure workers’ compensation coverage and related services through a state-coordinated network, with supporters saying the industry faces unique banking and insurance constraints and that the bill would improve compliance and transparency. Opponents argued it could amount to a form of amnesty and questioned whether the industry was simply avoiding existing requirements. The committee advanced AB 1209 to Business and Professions. Finally, AB 1 would require the Department of Insurance to review and consider updates to the Safer from Wildfire regulations every five years starting in 2030; it drew broad support from the department, insurers, local governments, and fire-safety advocates, and was sent to Appropriations. Most measures passed on strong or unanimous votes, with AB 1209 receiving a 15-2 vote.
VT

Vermont 2025-2026 Regular Session

House Session - 2026-05-26 - 10:00AM

Vermont House Floor Meeting

Transcript Highlights:
  • Representatives, becoming a passionate and effective voice on matters related to education, the judiciary
  • 57.720><c> the</c> voice on matters related education, the voice on matters related education, the judiciary
  • ><c> and</c><00:03:58.880><c> law</c><00:03:59.040><c> enforcement,</c><00:03:59.840><c> and</c> judiciary
  • , and law enforcement, and judiciary, and law enforcement, and social<00:04:00.400><c> equity,</c><00
CA
Transcript Highlights:
  • The Senate Budget Subcommittee No. 5 on Corrections, Public Safety, Judiciary, Labor, and Transportation
  • The Senate Budget Subcommittee No. 5 on Corrections, Public Safety, Judiciary, Labor and Transportation
  • The Senate Budget Subcommittee, number five on corrections, public safety, judiciary, The Senate Budget
  • Subcommittee No. 5 on Corrections, Public Safety, Judiciary, Labor and Transportation is now adjourned
CA
Transcript Highlights:
  • The Senate Budget Subcommittee No. 5 on Corrections, Public Safety, Judiciary, Labor, and Transportation
  • The Senate Budget Subcommittee No. 5 on Corrections, Public Safety, Judiciary, Labor and Transportation
  • The Senate Budget Subcommittee, number five on corrections, public safety, judiciary, The Senate Budget
  • Subcommittee No. 5 on Corrections, Public Safety, Judiciary, Labor and Transportation is now adjourned
Summary: The Senate Budget Subcommittee No. 5 heard an update from the California High-Speed Rail Authority on its draft 2026 business plan and related budget proposals. The Authority reported continued Central Valley construction progress, including completion of 59 of 92 major structures, 80 of 119 miles of guideway under construction, 93% utility relocation completion, and plans to begin track laying and electrification soon. It said the revised goal remains completing the Merced-to-Bakersfield early operating segment by 2032-33, while also pursuing ancillary revenue opportunities, a private partner through a co-development procurement, and two budget change proposals to reappropriate $423 million for Link Union Station and $246 million in federal trust funds before they expire. The Legislative Analyst’s Office said it had no specific concerns with the budget change proposals but raised major concerns about the draft business plan and the project’s broader fiscal outlook. LAO said the plan appears incomplete in several respects, that funding is likely insufficient to complete the revised initial operating segment and would leave a larger gap for expansion beyond the Central Valley, and that borrowing costs, optimistic assumptions, and uncertainty around future greenhouse gas reduction fund revenues could worsen the outlook. LAO suggested the Legislature could wait for a finalized business plan and highlighted unresolved questions about the scope of the project, borrowing, public-private partnerships, and proposed statutory changes. Members focused on whether the project can be delivered on time and what financial obligations the state could face. Senators questioned the need for tax increment financing, value capture, and other legislative changes, with concerns about impacts on local governments and school districts. The Authority said utility relocation authority is its top legislative priority and that value capture is a longer-term tool that would not affect civil construction of Merced-to-Bakersfield, but could affect payback timing. It also said the state’s $1 billion annual cap-and-invest funding through 2045 is currently assumed to cover the Central Valley segment, while private partners could either finance against that state commitment or invest additional capital in other segments. Public testimony was mixed: building trades and labor groups supported the project and the Authority’s request, while local government and special district representatives opposed tax increment proposals and urged consent from affected agencies; environmental and rail advocates supported the project and urged action on utility relocation. No votes were taken, and the hearing adjourned after public comment.
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Texas Supreme Court Investiture May 7th, 2026

Texas House Floor Meeting

Transcript Highlights:
  • On behalf of the court and the entire judiciary of the state of Texas, thank you, Justice Alito, for
  • Nathan cares deeply about the grand architecture of the judiciary, but he cares even more. texture of
  • the judiciary, but he cares even more whether ordinary Texans can get through the front door.
  • And to all of my valued colleagues at every level of the state and federal judiciary, it's an honor to
Summary: The Supreme Court of Texas held a ceremonial investiture for two new justices, James Sullivan and Kyle Hawkins. Chief Justice Jimmy Blacklock opened the session with welcoming remarks and led the Pledge of Allegiance, followed by the National Anthem sung by Trooper Alena Gallardo. The event included an invocation by Father Dean Wilhelm, emphasizing the importance of justice and the rule of law. Governor Greg Abbott praised the new justices, highlighting their qualifications and the significance of their appointments to the court. Justice Samuel Alito administered the oath of office to Justice Hawkins, while Judge Thomas Griffith administered the oath to Justice Sullivan. Both justices expressed gratitude for their appointments and acknowledged the support of their families, mentors, and colleagues. The ceremony also honored former justices Jeff Boyd and Nathan Hecht, with heartfelt tributes reflecting on their contributions to the court and the legal community in Texas. The event concluded with a benediction by Reverend Greg Davidson, encouraging the justices to work diligently and honorably in their new roles.
MO

Missouri 2026 Regular Session

Judiciary Feb 11th, 2026

Judiciary and Civil and Criminal Jurisprudence

Transcript Highlights:
  • I will now call the Committee on Judiciary to order.
  • This is related to offenses involving the judiciary. House Bill 2699 be voted do pass.
  • This is related to offenses involving the judiciary. Is there any discussion?
  • Further, this will conclude the Judiciary Committee today. Thank you all.
Summary: The Judiciary Committee first met in executive session and took up House Bill 2699, which concerns offenses involving the judiciary. The committee adopted a House Committee substitute and two amendments: one adding circuit clerks, deputy circuit clerks, court administrators, division clerks, and municipal clerks, and another adding court reporters who are active participants in courtroom activities. The substitute bill was then voted do pass by a roll call of six ayes, two noes, and two present; one member stated a personal interest and voted present. The committee then held a public hearing on House Bill 2848, the so-called “mask intimidation” bill sponsored by Representative Dolan. The bill would create a Class C misdemeanor for intentionally harassing, intimidating, or threatening another person while concealing one’s identity with a mask or similar covering, with exceptions for legitimate uses such as medical, religious, holiday, and First Amendment-related activity. Supporters, including the Anti-Defamation League, said the bill would address masked intimidation by extremist groups and protect targeted communities; there was no opposition testimony. A public hearing followed on House Bill 2765, sponsored by Representative Justice, which would regulate intoxicating hemp beverages through a framework modeled on alcohol’s three-tier system. The bill would set licensing, testing, labeling, packaging, age-21 sales restrictions, and THC limits, and assign oversight to the Department of Health and Senior Services and the Division of Alcohol and Tobacco Control. Support came from the Missouri Beer Wholesalers Association, Hemp Beverage Alliance, Missouri Petroleum and Convenience Association, Torch Drinks, Total Wine, and others, who argued the bill would create needed guardrails, keep products away from minors, and preserve a regulated retail market; some witnesses also urged broader regulation of other hemp-derived products. There was no opposition testimony, and the committee concluded its hearing without taking final action on HB 2765.
NM

New Mexico 2026 Regular Session

House - Judiciary Feb 2nd, 2026 at 02:11 pm

House Judiciary

Transcript Highlights:
  • This is your House Judiciary Committee, and I am calling it to order.
  • Good afternoon, Madam Chair and members of the Judiciary Committee.
  • I recommend a do not pass on House Bill 32 and a do pass on House Judiciary Committee Substitute for
  • I move I do not pass on House Bill 33 and I do pass on House Judiciary Committee Substitute for House
Bills: HB9 , HB50
MS

Mississippi 2026 Regular Session

Education - Room 216, 2 February, 2026; 1:45 PM

Education

Transcript Highlights:
  • We had a big debate in Judiciary B last week.
  • c><00:10:14.320><c> big</c><00:10:14.480><c> debate</c><00:10:14.800><c> in</c><00:10:14.959><c> Judiciary
  • </c><00:10:15.680><c> B</c><00:10:16.000><c> last</c> had a big debate in Judiciary B last had a big
  • debate in Judiciary B last week.<00:10:17.200><c> So,</c><00:10:17.680><c> and</c><00:10:17.839><c> I
Committee: Joint Education
MN

Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session

Countering Climate Change – Senator Rob Kupec May 26th, 2025

Minnesota Senate Floor Meeting

Transcript Highlights:
  • Unfortunately, in a very tight budget year that comes through the judiciary, which, you know, is worried
  • that comes a very tight budget year that comes through<00:07:59.280><c> the</c><00:07:59.440><c> judiciary
  • ,</c><00:08:00.639><c> um,</c><00:08:00.800><c> which,</c><00:08:01.120><c> you</c> through the judiciary
  • , um, which, you through the judiciary, um, which, you know,<00:08:01.440><c> is</c><00:08:01.840><c>
MN

Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session

Senate Floor Session - 05/16/25

Minnesota Senate Floor Meeting

Transcript Highlights:
  • Uh, the Workers Compensation 2025.
  • </c><00:19:07.440><c> fraud</c> to combating workers compensation fraud to combating workers compensation
  • Workers' Compensation Advisory Council.
  • The court has exclusive statewide authority to review workers compensation cases decided by compensation
  • The court has exclusive statewide authority to review workers compensation cases decided by compensation
MN
Transcript Highlights:
  • I am the Co-Chair of the House Judiciary and Civil Law Committee, and I'm Rochester area.
  • I chair the Senate Judiciary and Public Safety Committee.
  • I'm on the Judiciary and Public Safety Committee. All right, members, we still have a mic delay.
  • On the side-by-side page, R1 contains the judiciary-related adjustments.
  • </c> that we have a strong judiciary. that we have a strong judiciary.
Summary: The Safety and Security Conference Committee met on May 13, 2026, with a quorum present and no immediate vote taken. Chairs explained the committee was working ahead of a possible target so it could act quickly later if needed, then proceeded with member introductions and a reminder about committee decorum. Staff noted a microphone delay and said the meeting would include a side-by-side walk-through of the House and Senate policy language and a review of the fiscal spreadsheet. Fiscal staff summarized major differences in court, public safety, and legislative security funding. The House and Senate proposals differed on safety and security funding for the Supreme Court, Court of Appeals, and District Courts, as well as on courthouse grants, capital security enhancements, and a new legislative/protective services unit. Staff also reviewed Senate-only and House-only items, including a Senate proposal to require removal of insignia from public safety vehicles sold to the public, and House provisions for a security services task force and member security costs. Total general fund impacts were reviewed, with the House total corrected to include an open appropriation that had been omitted from the spreadsheet totals. Nonpartisan staff then walked through the policy differences. The Senate language focused on a Protective Services Unit and security for principal state officials, while the House language focused on a Legislative Services Unit and security for legislators. Both bills included provisions on Capitol Complex Security, reporting requirements, and reimbursement arrangements with local law enforcement, but differed on details such as whether elected officials must provide contact information to DPS and how requests for personal protective services are handled. The House-only amendment A8 was presented for discussion; it would revise emergency contact provisions, replace the House’s personal protective services request language with a more detailed threat assessment and mitigation framework, direct implementation of the new unit, and make related reimbursement and technical changes. Judge Richard Kyle, president of the Minnesota District Judges Association, testified in support of stronger judicial and court safety measures. He described rising threats against judges, citing survey results showing high rates of judges limiting personal information, receiving inappropriate communications, changing personal behavior, and experiencing threats to themselves and family members. He said the association supports legislative authorization and funding for home security and personal data protections for judicial officers, and emphasized that safety concerns for judges and court staff have become more serious in recent years.
HI

Hawaii 2025 Regular Session

PBS Info Briefing - Mon Nov 10, 2025 @ 10:15 AM HST

Hawaii House Floor Meeting

Transcript Highlights:
  • throat] Um, the Office of the Public Defender is funded through the State of Hawaii through the judiciary
  • And again, I don't know um we did not directly communicate with either the judiciary or Homeland Security
  • </c><01:08:22.480><c> or</c><01:08:22.799><c> homeland</c> with either the judiciary or homeland with
  • </c><01:10:14.960><c> And</c><01:10:15.120><c> we</c><01:10:15.280><c> and</c> through the judiciary
  • And we and through the judiciary first.
Summary: The Committee on Public Safety held an informational briefing on findings from the deportation data project and possible policy responses to increased federal immigration enforcement in Hawaii. In opening remarks, the chair said the committee was concerned about changing federal executive orders, policies, and enforcement actions, and framed the issue as one involving due process and public safety. The chair and presenters described reports of ICE activity on multiple islands, including raids, courthouse presence, and fear in immigrant communities, and said the committee was considering whether state policies should be advanced more quickly. Mandy Fernandez of the ACLU of Hawaii presented updated deportation data and argued that increased immigration enforcement is creating fear, reducing crime reporting, and potentially making state and local agencies extensions of the federal immigration agenda if they accept federal funding with conditions. She said the deportation data project, housed at UC Berkeley Law with UCLA’s Center for Immigration Law and Policy, uses FOIA requests and its latest data runs through late July 2025. She reported 153 ICE arrests in Hawaii from January through July 2025, up from 41 in the same period in 2024; 96 removals, up from 15; a federal detention center average daily population of 91 in June 2025 versus 31 in June 2024; and 111 ICE detainers issued in Hawaii from September 2023 through July 2025, with 49 issued in 2025. She also cited an immigration court backlog of 1,144 pending cases as of August 2025 and noted that about one in five Hawaii residents were born outside the United States. Haley Chang of the Office of the Public Defender said her office is seeing a marked increase in ICE presence around courthouses and more ICE contacts with clients, including reports of people being detained after court appearances or while on supervision. She emphasized that the office is not an immigration law office and that much of its information is anecdotal, but said the pattern appears new compared with prior years. In response to committee questions, she explained that ICE detainers are requests, not judicial warrants, and said local law enforcement is generally not required to honor them unless accompanied by a judicial warrant or other legal authority. She also said the public defender’s office had not yet seen new criminal charges arise solely from an ICE detention or failure to appear tied to immigration enforcement, though cases could be affected if defendants are removed from the criminal process.
NH

New Hampshire 2025 Regular Session

Senate Session (05/01/2025)

New Hampshire Senate Floor Meeting

Transcript Highlights:
  • from EDNA: House Bill 331 and House Bill 445; from HHS: House Bill 357 and House Bill 731; from Judiciary
  • Bill 357 and House Bill 731<00:22:22.320><c> from</c><00:22:22.640><c> from</c><00:22:22.880><c> Judiciary
  • /c><00:22:23.520><c> House</c><00:22:23.679><c> Bill</c><00:22:24.280><c> 468,</c> 731 from from Judiciary
  • , House Bill 468, 731 from from Judiciary, House Bill 468, House<00:22:25.520><c> Bill</c><00:22:26.120
  • following bills are special ordered to the next session: from Election Law, House Bill 107; from Judiciary
IA

Iowa 2025-2026 Regular Session

House in Session Feb 20th, 2026 at 11:30 am

Iowa House Floor Meeting

Transcript Highlights:
  • House File 2660 by the Committee on Judiciary, a bill for an act relating to decedent property, including
  • House File 2660 by the Committee on Judiciary, a bill for an act relating to decedent property, including
NH

New Hampshire 2025 Regular Session

House Judiciary (02/19/2025)

Transcript Highlights:
  • </c><00:28:57.720><c> meet</c> members of the House Judiciary meet members of the House Judiciary meet
  • Dear honorable members of the House Judiciary Committee, my name is M. Jax.
  • Thank you, members of the House Judiciary Committee. My name is Leor Frank.
  • Hello, honorable members of the Judiciary Committee.
  • Good morning, Chair Manion, uh, members of the House Judiciary Committee.
Summary: The House Judiciary Committee opened a hearing on House Bill 148, with the chair limiting testimony to two minutes and asking for no outbursts so the committee could get through eight bills that day. Representative Kofalt, the prime sponsor, said HB 148 was the same as last year’s HB 396, which passed both chambers but was vetoed by the governor. He explained the bill would allow, but not require, separation by biological sex in bathrooms, locker rooms, houses of correction, and certain athletic competitions, leaving local school boards and administrators discretion to set policies. He argued the bill was meant to address safety and privacy concerns and cited a Milford incident and concerns in several school districts as examples of why local flexibility was needed. Committee members questioned the lack of a definition of “biological sex” and how the bill would be applied. Kofalt said he did not think a definition was necessary because males and females are generally understood, and he said the bill would give local policymakers latitude to make practical rules. He also said the bill was intended to address situations where people might misuse transgender claims to access spaces inappropriately. In response to questions, he said he was aware of issues in Kearsarge, Milford, and Mascoma school districts and had heard of discomfort in the State House, though he did not know all the details. Several opponents testified that the bill would discriminate against transgender and non-binary people and create enforcement problems. Executive Councilor Karen Hill said the bill would roll back New Hampshire’s anti-discrimination protections and conflict with the state’s Live Free or Die values. Alice Wade, a trans woman, said she had used women’s restrooms without incident and argued the bill would invite invasive enforcement and harassment. Representative La Selig said the bill was discriminatory and that bathroom concerns were being confused with unrelated harassment by cisgender males. Betsy Harrington supported the bill, citing a girls’ soccer game at Kearsarge that she said was disrupted by a boy playing on a girls’ team. Rosie Emer and her child testified against the bill, saying bathroom restrictions would increase anxiety and risk for trans and non-binary children. Stephen Scaer and Wendy Stallings supported the bill, arguing sex is biologically fixed and that excluding males from female spaces should not require genital inspections. No vote or final committee action was taken in the portion of the hearing provided.
NH

New Hampshire 2025 Regular Session

House Session (05/01/2025)

New Hampshire House Floor Meeting

Transcript Highlights:
  • The majority of the Committee on Judiciary, to which was referred Senate Bill 146FN, an act relative
  • and Rehabilitative Services, to which was referred Senate Bill 67FN, an act relative to workers' compensation
  • employers to provide certain information regarding cost sharing to employees receiving workers' compensation
CA
Transcript Highlights:
  • up to a 20% compensation increase.
  • They adopted a compensation policy that removed a 10% compensation increase cap.
  • In fact, the CSU didn't even include the compensation study of community colleges in their own compensation
  • on top of this compensation.
  • They talk about, the CSU talks about these compensations in the context of equity.
Summary: The Assembly Higher Education Committee met for a policy hearing on several higher education bills. AB 1534 (Irwin) would create a California approval process for short-term workforce Pell Grant programs; supporters said it would expand access to job training with consumer protections, while a neutral witness urged more work on implementation. Members raised concerns about the bill’s $4,000 tuition cap, but the measure passed 5-1 with an urgency clause and was sent to Labor and Employment. AB 1831 (Irwin) would cap compensation for certain CSU administrators, bar raises in years when tuition rises, and repeal a 2025 executive pay resolution; the author said she would amend the bill to remove retroactive repeal, narrow the scope, and clarify that it applies to base salary and non-represented managers. CFA, students, and labor groups supported the bill as an accountability measure, while CSU opposed it, arguing the cap would hurt recruitment and retention. The committee approved the bill 4-1-3 and sent it to Appropriations. The committee also advanced AB 1555 (Hadwick), which would allow up to 200 students to qualify for in-state tuition at College of the Siskiyous under a cross-border regional arrangement; it passed unanimously to Appropriations. AB 1552 (Jackson), requiring the community colleges and CSU and requesting UC to report recommendations on civic engagement and democracy education, also passed to Appropriations after some members objected that such programs could be used for partisan activity. AB 1829, which expands CalWORKs student-parent support by allowing more direct aid and waiving a 25% work-study employer match at the colleges’ discretion, passed 8-1 and was re-referred to Human Services. The committee later added on consent items and adjourned after announcing its next hearing date.
MN

Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session

Committee on Judiciary and Public Safety - Part 1 - 03/27/26

Judiciary and Public Safety

Transcript Highlights:
  • The Senate Judiciary and Public Safety Committee will come to order. We do have a quorum present.
  • I believe at one point there was thought of assembling it here in Senate Judiciary.
  • I believe at one point there was thought of assembling it here in Senate Judiciary.
  • </c><00:16:18.160><c> and</c> this, whether or not the Judiciary and this, whether or not the Judiciary
  • Senator Lance, welcome to the Judiciary Committee. It is a pleasure to be here.