Transcript Highlights:

• The hearing room is open for in-person attendance in this hearing, but all are encouraged to watch the
• The hearing room is open for in-person attendance in this hearing, but all are encouraged to watch the
• And we hear about that. So I want to flag that.
• I'm hearing.
• I'm hearing.

Summary: The committee first heard AB 1157, the Affordable Rent Act, which would lower California’s annual rent cap, remove the single-family home exemption, and eliminate the sunset on existing tenant protections. The author and supporters argued that renters are facing severe affordability pressures, especially in single-family rentals, and that stronger statewide rent stabilization is needed to prevent displacement and homelessness. Opponents, including apartment, building, and property-owner groups, said the bill would discourage housing production, harm small landlords, and override a deal they said was intended to be temporary while the state focused on building more housing. Public testimony on AB 1157 was extensive, with many renters, tenant advocates, labor groups, and community organizations speaking in support, while many landlords, business groups, and property-owner representatives spoke in opposition. Committee members were split: some praised the bill as a necessary response to the rent crisis, while others warned it could reduce investment and worsen the housing shortage. The committee ultimately voted 7-5 to pass AB 1157 to the Assembly Judiciary Committee. The committee then approved the consent calendar, including AB 413, AB 1152, and AB 1275, on a 9-0 vote. It also heard ACA 3, which would require the University of California to make available a limited number of down payment loans for eligible long-term support staff who are first-time homebuyers. Supporters said the measure would help lower-wage UC workers afford homeownership and improve retention, while UC and other opponents argued the proposal was duplicative of existing state programs, unnecessary, and potentially harmful to UC finances. The discussion focused on financing mechanics and the relationship to CalHFA, but no final vote on ACA 3 was included in the portion provided.

Transcript Highlights:

• in favor of the landlord after hearing. in favor of the landlord after hearing.
• and due process.
• and due process.
• and due process.
• hearing until 1:15. hearing until 1:15. Enjoy. All right.

Keywords: 928, house, all

Summary: The Housing Committee opened with a public hearing on HB 196, which would repeal the Housing Champion program. Representative Matt Drew, the prime sponsor, argued the program is an unnecessary and poorly targeted subsidy, saying it rewards municipalities after projects are completed and may not be limited to new housing production. He questioned the transparency of the program, cited difficulty finding required annual reports, and noted a fiscal note suggesting the state could recover up to $3 million if obligations are terminated. Committee members and witnesses debated whether the program’s criteria amount to political favoritism or a standard grant process; supporters said the rubric is specific and that municipalities are evaluated against objective requirements. Representative Priest, Nick Taylor of Housing Action New Hampshire, and Karen Benfield of Stay Work Play New Hampshire all opposed repeal, saying the program encourages local zoning and regulatory changes, helps smaller communities participate, and supports housing supply and young people’s ability to stay in the state. The hearing on HB 196 was then closed. The committee then opened a hearing on HB 1405, a bill establishing an affordable housing guarantee program within the Housing Finance Authority. Prime sponsor Representative Chris Muns said the bill would reduce lender risk by guaranteeing up to 80% of principal on qualifying loans for affordable housing, with a cap of $30 million per lender per year and $300 million outstanding at any time. He described the measure as a low-cost public-private partnership backed by the full faith and credit of the state, and said it was identical to a prior Senate bill that had received unanimous bipartisan committee support before dying later in the process. He framed the bill as one part of a broader housing package aimed at financing, infrastructure, workforce, zoning reform, and other housing-related issues. No votes were taken during the portion of the meeting provided. The only formal actions were opening and closing the public hearing on HB 196 and opening the public hearing on HB 1405, with testimony continuing on HB 1405 at the end of the transcript.

Transcript Highlights:

• We have 101 bills to consider this morning as part of our regular order hearing.
• The hearing room is open for attendance.
• Tunisia hearing on behalf of the NAACP California State Conference in support.
• hearings office was created.
• That is what the regulatory process is for. That's why it takes time.

Keywords: 988, house, all

Transcript Highlights:

• Decision-making will follow after the hearing is done, and this is the hearings from the testifiers as
• Decision-making will follow after the hearing is done, and this is the hearings from the testifiers as
• is to pass this measure as is hearing is to pass this measure as is hearing non<00:09:44.360>
• <00:18:13.600> uh uh as we have received um the process uh uh as we have received um the process
• This concludes the Water and Land Committee hearing. reservations hearing n Madam chair reservations

Keywords: 912, senate, all

Summary: The Committee on Water and Land opened with housekeeping remarks about testimony limits, video availability, and that decision-making would follow the hearing. The committee then heard and considered several SCRs authorizing long-term nonexclusive easements over state submerged lands for existing public or private infrastructure on Oahu, including stormwater outfalls, shoreline protection structures, concrete stairs, seawalls, and a rock revetment. DLNR supported each measure and generally requested only technical or clarifying amendments; for SCR 3, DLNR asked that the title be clarified to specify the easement would be granted to the City and County of Honolulu. After discussion, the committee adopted the chair’s recommendations, passing SCR 3 with amendments and SCRs 4, 6, and 7 unamended, while SCR 5 was passed with technical, non-substantive amendments. Senator Meli noted general concerns about seawalls and hardening but said he would support the measures because they involved repair of existing structures and public access, though he indicated a reservation on SCR 6. The committee then took up governor’s messages for HCDA appointments. For GM 58, Gerald Gordner was nominated to the Kalaeloa district seat; HCDA’s executive director and another supporter praised his urban planning, housing, zoning, GIS, and collaborative skills, and Gordner described his interim service and background in housing affordability and disaster recovery. Members also discussed a former military hangar in Kalaeloa and possible future uses, with Gordner noting he understood there had been restrictions that were later lifted, while the chair raised concerns about airport operations and modular housing use. The committee also heard support for GM 559, nominating Micki Lidstone as cultural specialist; HCDA said she had been an active and reliable board participant and cultural resource, and Lidstone said she valued learning from Native Hawaiian testimony and helping balance community perspectives. Finally, GM 688 nominated Deborah Kabibi to the Leeward Oahu/Maui district seat; HCDA said her community ties would be valuable for South Maui planning, and Kabibi said she had learned a lot from the board’s collaborative process and was eager to represent her community. The transcript ends during discussion of GM 688, before any vote on the nominations is shown.

Transcript Highlights:

• I know that can be, you know, a long drive for a hearing like this.
• We often hear the will of the people is the...
• is ongoing. ...the register while the standing committee process is ongoing.
• You know, decide something contrary to the rule, what's the next process?
• process before it gets to the standing committees, it will have had a public hearing.

Keywords: 970, all

Transcript Highlights:

• Sort of the process of what that is.
• Part of that process was to have a random selection process.
• was to have a random that process was to have a random selection<00:30:23.200> process.
• This is about an 11-step process.
• process from that standpoint. process from that standpoint.

Keywords: 1183, house

Summary: The committee met on March 4, 2026, and focused almost entirely on an update and oversight discussion of the Promise Act, including its grant and loan programs. The chair opened by explaining that the committee wanted to better understand how the 2023 law was implemented, how funds are still being deployed in greater Minnesota and the metro, and whether adjustments made in 2024 and 2025 were working as intended. The minutes from March 3 were approved at the start of the meeting. Deputy Commissioner Kevin McKinnon of DEED outlined the program’s legislative history, funding structure, eligibility rules, and oversight process. He said the grant side has about $94 million available, with $16 million going to the Minnesota Initiative Foundations and $86 million to the Neighborhood Development Center, plus administrative and technical assistance set-asides. He noted legislative changes over time, including shifting the revenue eligibility test to the prior year, adding a home-office deduction requirement for businesses using a home address, and maintaining a preference for applicants who had not received more than $10,000 in prior state assistance. McKinnon said about $22 million had been awarded to 35 businesses at the time of the update, and that the loan program has $30 million appropriated, with about $9.5 million lent so far. He also described the application, verification, audit, and payment process, emphasizing that partners handle intake and DEED conducts final review and random audits. Shahir Ahmmed of the Neighborhood Development Center described the round-one and round-two grant process in more detail. He said NDC spent about nine months building the application platform, launched round one in June 2024, received more than 3,000 applications, and later paused awards while DEED and legislators clarified the law. He reported that 651 applications were approved in the first round for just under $9 million, and that round two launched in September 2025 with a goal of distributing up to $50 million in remaining grant funds. Ahmmed also explained the step-by-step applicant process, including email confirmation, eligibility screening, document upload, identity verification through Plaid, and final DEED review. He said applicants commonly use funds for payroll, equipment or inventory, rent, and utilities. The chair indicated there would be further testimony from other program partners and then member questions, but no votes or formal actions were taken on the Promise Act itself during this portion of the meeting.

Transcript Highlights:

• Hearing none. committee substitute is adopted.
• Hearing none, the committee substitute is adopted.
• I want to thank you all for hearing... this bill.
• Chair hears none. And the bill is left pending.
• Chair hears none and the bill is left pending.

Keywords: 1184, house, all

Transcript Highlights:

• They can't cover it all in this hearing today.
• Hearing none, the rules are adopted.
• process.
• Hear them out.
• So you have to go through the process. There is due process, and we are listening to everyone.

Keywords: 1185, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• The hearing room is open for attendance of this hearing, and it can be watched from a live stream on
• At this time, we are hearing one particular bill. It is SB 63 by Senator Wiener.
• I hear the opposite from my colleague.
• And a lot of these agencies had multiple public hearings before they even got to a hearing with a vote
• I appreciate the cooperative process across the region.

Summary: The Assembly Transportation Committee heard SB 63 by Senator Wiener, as amended and coauthored by Senator Arreguín, a Bay Area transit funding measure intended to avert major service cuts at BART, Muni, Caltrain, and AC Transit. The authors said the region faces a fiscal cliff and that without new revenue, BART could collapse and other systems could face severe reductions. They described the bill as the product of extensive negotiations among the five Bay Area counties and transit operators, with San Mateo and Santa Clara counties opting in during the process. Much of the discussion focused on accountability and governance. Supporters said the bill includes some of the strongest oversight provisions in recent memory, including a third-party efficiency review and ad hoc adjudication committees that can withhold a portion of funding if operators fail to correct problems. Assembly Member Papin and Assembly Member Lackey argued the measure amounts to a taxpayer bailout with insufficient representation and too much control left to MTC, while the authors responded that the bill gives affected counties direct complaint and enforcement authority and that MTC must follow the ad hoc committees’ recommendations. Several members asked about complaint procedures, withholding thresholds, opt-in/opt-out issues, and whether the funding would return to the source counties if withheld. Testimony in support came from SPUR, Caltrain, MTC, the Bay Area Council, BART, SamTrans, VTA, San Francisco MTA, transit coalitions, environmental groups, local governments, and labor. Supporters emphasized the risk of severe service cuts, the importance of preserving recent investments such as Caltrain electrification, and the need for regional self-help. There was no registered opposition witness, though some members spoke against the bill. The committee ultimately voted 11-5 to pass SB 63 as amended to the floor, with the committee amendments also removing urgency language.

Transcript Highlights:

• We hear the tone of the frustration. We hear the tone of voice.
• process and transmission process. process. process.
• evaluation process.
• <02:19:19.519> for process uh and the phase two process for process uh and the phase two process
• We do that by process planning process.

Keywords: 916, all

Transcript Highlights:

• Now, we're in this hearing and a public hearing.
• <00:07:12.000> We're this hearing and a public hearing.
• We're this hearing and a public hearing.
• because it is a public hearing. because it is a public hearing.
• . process. process.

Keywords: 1183, house

Transcript Highlights:

• You'll hear a resource hub. You'll hear a service array, a navigator.
• Process lives in the individual people.
• some sort of administrative process.
• We're not a trial, we're a hearing.
• It's an open court process.

Summary: The committee opened with a moment of silence honoring a deceased member, then approved the April minutes. The first major presentation was from Chelsea Florey of Child and Family Services on the Diversion Task Force and related grant programs created with one-time funding from HB 1012. She reported that five of six proposals were funded, with youth diversion services operating in Bismarck, Fargo, Grand Forks, Minot, and a Red River Children’s Advocacy Center program focused on problematic sexualized behavior. Members discussed barriers such as staffing shortages, voluntary family engagement, service fatigue, and the need for better coordination, broader outreach, and possible changes to diversion eligibility rules so low-level cases can remain in diversion longer. Several legislators pressed for more practical system changes and clearer service navigation, while Florey said the task force is trying to build a service array or hub and is leaning on the Children’s Cabinet for broader recommendations. The committee then heard from North Dakota Lottery Director Thomas Lawler, who gave an operational overview and biennium report. He described the lottery’s history, games, retailer commissions, Pick and Click subscriptions, Players Club membership, and revenue distribution. For the 2023-25 biennium, about $67 million in tickets were purchased, with roughly $16.2 million transferred overall, including money for the general fund, drug task force grants, and compulsive gambling prevention and treatment. Members asked about the compulsive gambling allocation and whether the amount is set by statute. A lengthy presentation followed from the Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation on criminal justice data connectivity and reentry. Adam Anderson explained that North Dakota’s jail, court, HHS, and correctional systems use multiple separate databases that do not communicate in real time, requiring manual cross-checks and staff communication. He said the department is exploring a centralized hub or other integration approach, but noted challenges with identifiers, vendor contracts, confidentiality, and cost. Robin Schmolenberger then updated the committee on a Medicaid data-sharing project with HHS, saying monthly application assistance is now occurring in correctional facilities and that automated bi-directional data exchange is expected in late 2026 to help suspend and reactivate Medicaid coverage and identify former foster care youth. Members also discussed parole, probation, transitional housing, and the need for better real-time notifications and clearer data definitions. The committee also received an update from county representatives on the 24/7 sobriety program, including a recent attorney general opinion that if a court waives 24/7 fees, sheriffs may use the cheaper twice-daily breath test or urine testing instead of SCRAM bracelets or drug patches. Finally, Bruce Johnson of the Racing Commission presented on an audit report, acknowledging serious findings involving overspending from the promotion fund, grant documentation failures, a breeders fund eligibility reversal, and repeated procurement violations. He said the commission has already changed its procedures by tracking fund limits monthly, requiring grant applications and itemized reports, enforcing breeders fund rules as written, and routing purchases through procurement with written contracts. The committee asked follow-up questions throughout but took no formal votes on these presentations.

Transcript Highlights:

• Hearing no objection, the reader will read.
• Have a better quality when it comes to the permitting process and the inspection process.
• I didn't quite hear that.
• President, I'm sorry, I couldn't hear that.
• Um Of that actual body of of this process.

Transcript Highlights:

• You click on and streamline the process. There's a lot of process issues.
• That's a broken process.
• So where are we now in our recovery process?
• I think the process in place works.
• I'm interested to hear maybe what we learned from that process, what that was like coordinating, are

Transcript Highlights:

• Hooray, never gets a hearing.
• You hear, Brian? Yes, he is.
• You hear, Brian? Yes, he is.
• The processes are not known. The length of time of the processes are not known.
• The processes are not known. The length of time of the processes are not known.

Bills: SB1041, SB1088, SB1118, SB1128, SB1168, SB1176, SB1189, SB1207, SB1250, SB1272, SB1274, SB1286, SB1428, SB1457, SB1461, SB1503, SB1519, SB1537, SB1582, SB1618, SB1654, SB1713, SB1827, SCR1012, SCR1020

Keywords: electronic monitoring, nursing care, assisted living, resident rights, privacy, consent, surveillance, cybersecurity, homeland security, artificial intelligence, state appropriation, VPN security, zero trust, housing, zoning, middle housing, urban development, duplexes, triplexes, fourplexes

Transcript Highlights:

• We’ll close the hearing on 12:31 and we’ll open up our next hearing at 13:47. >> Right.
• close the public hearing on 1347. close the public hearing on 1347.
• Um process there.
• about claims processing. about claims processing.
• not duplicate an appeals process. not duplicate an appeals process.

Keywords: 1189, house, all

Transcript Highlights:

• I mean, I hear you. I hear what you're saying, but...
• I mean, I hear you, I hear what you're saying, but Greenlee County, and you're not involved in this piece
• I think the process began in '22. The RFP process was completed in '23.
• There's a textbook RFP process. I think eight vendors were surveyed, and ...textbook RFP process.
• I've heard this hearing for a few hours now.

Keywords: 1182, all

Transcript Highlights:

• I mean, we, we definitely, I hear you and we definitely hear that too, you know, we're, we work with
• That were processed, um, more than 2 million renewals that were processed.
• We had it in another hearing, and I, but I didn't bring it.
• Are you in the appropriations process?
• We, we try to get them, uh, processed as quickly as possible.

Transcript Highlights:

• The agency also had proposed that process. process for the medically dependent children program waiver
• We definitely I hear you and we definitely hear that. We work with these stakeholders a lot.
• applications that were processed, more than 2 million renewals that were processed.
• He gets due process.
• We try to get them processed as quickly as possible.

Keywords: 1184, house, all

Transcript Highlights:

• And with that, I will close the hearing on Assembly Bill 576 and open the hearing on Assembly Bill 213
• We are going to hear three more bills. We will hear Assembly Bill 6, then Senate Bill 507.
• We will hear Senate Bill 507, and then we will hear Assembly Bill 593.
• And we'll close the hearing on Senate Bill 507 and we will open the hearing on Assembly Bill 594.
• Is that what I'm hearing?

Bills: AB6, AB102, AB131, AB212, AB213, AB220, AB259, AB282, AB376, AB396, AB479, AB503, AB570, AB572, AB574, AB576, AB593, SB185, SB207, SB507, AB6

Keywords: fetal alcohol spectrum disorder, FASD, prenatal alcohol exposure, children's health, developmental disability, early intervention, treatment assistance, Aging and Disability Services Division, Department of Health and Human Services, Autism Treatment Assistance Program, public health, parent education, evidence-based treatment, Nevada NRS 427A, disability services, behavioral health, emergency medical services, ambulance, licensing, health district