Transcript Highlights:

• The next section is a waiver of rights.
• So on two different sections of this.
• Um, so on section<01:15:49.520><c> B,</c> section B, section B, we're<01:15:51.360><c> going</c><01:15
• Uh for the purpose of section B.
• So in section &gt;&gt; Thank you, Mr. Chairman.

Bills: SF0050, SF0084, HB0133, HB0116, HB0011, HB0044

Keywords: groundwater, water resource management, state engineer, aquifer study, corrective controls, monitoring wells, public reporting, water conservation, Colorado River, drought, irrigation, water rights, voluntary program, interstate agreements, conservation districts, supervisors, elections, agriculture, local governance, beneficial use

Transcript Highlights:

• Could you tell me the difference between where I am on page two and section two, where it talks about
• And could you tell me the difference between where I'm on page two and section two where it talks about
• You say you see that in section two.
• So on section two, it talks about removal of the camp in 90 days. That's like line 11.
• It says the municipality and the next one section is the county. Correct. Okay. Thank you.

Bills: SB1265, SB1198, SB2046

Keywords: municipal ordinances, local government, ordinance publication, posting requirement, public notice, municipal law, city ordinances, town ordinances, county government, newspaper publication, effective date, Oklahoma statutes, 11 O.S. 14-106, ordinance notice, government oversight, healthcare authority, property lien, county treasury, Oklahoma, municipalities

Summary: The Senate Local and County Government Committee met and first announced that Senate Bill 1619 would be laid over to a later date. The committee then heard Senate Bill 1265, which would extend the deadline for municipalities to publish ordinances from 15 days to 30 days, with supporters citing the decline of daily newspapers and the need to help cities meet publication requirements. The bill received a due pass recommendation and advanced on an 8-0 vote. The committee next considered Senate Bill 1198, which would require the Oklahoma Health Care Authority to release liens on property owned by a city or county when requested by the local treasurer. Senator Mann explained that the measure is intended to help local governments reuse tax-delinquent or code-violation properties for affordable housing, since liens can exceed the value of the property. The bill advanced on a 7-1 vote. After a brief recess, the committee took up Senate Bill 2046, as amended by committee substitute, which would allow the Department of Environmental Quality to determine the legality of campsites and evaluate whether sanitary and environmental standards are met. Members questioned the bill’s definitions, reporting thresholds, timelines, fiscal impact, and the role of DEQ and the Department of Public Safety in notifying counties and ordering removal of camps. Following debate, the bill advanced on a 6-2 vote.

Transcript Highlights:

• PRESIDENT OF THE FLORIDA SENATE, AND SPEAKER PEREZ, BY VIRTUE OF THE AUTHORITY VESTED IN US BY ARTICLE 3, SECTION
• 3C OF THE CONSTITUTION AND SECTION 11.011, DO HEREBY PROCLAIM THAT SECTION 1 OF THE LEGISLATURE OF THE
• SECTION 2, THAT THE LEGISLATURE IS CONVENED FOR THE SOLE AND EXCLUSIVE PURPOSE OF CONSIDERING LEGISLATION
• SECTION 3, THAT THE COMMITTEES AND SUBCOMMITTEES OF EITHER HOUSE OF THE LEGISLATURE ARE AUTHORIZED TO
• BYRD, AND UNDER THE AUTHORITY VESTED IN ME AS GOVERNOR OF FLORIDA, UNDER PROVISIONS OF ARTICLE 3, SECTION

Keywords: 999, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• Speaker, gentlelady, I'm going to go to section 3.
• Speaker and gentlemen, it magically reappears Section 5, section 6, section 9, 10, and 11 this year.
• Because there is one line, one tiny amount of section, probably a bad word, very small. section, because
• A of this, subsection A of this section.
• OK, I'll try to go by section then.

Transcript Highlights:

• The first, in section one, is just allowing a designee for the commissioner on the MJSP board in case
• Sections two and three are proposing to sunset the inventory economic development report and the net
• On section two, the inventory of economic development programs, can you just explain to the committee
• My questions are about section two and section three, and before I ask my question, one of the questions
• > two</c><01:14:16.800><c> and</c> my questions are about section two and my questions are about section

Keywords: 1187, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• </c> and section 14. and section 14. 386<00:15:45.279><c> then</c><00:15:45.519><c> the</c><00:15:45.680
• We deleted those sections. Yeah, okay.
• We deleted those sections. Yeah, okay.
• </c> thank you um we deleted those sections thank you um we deleted those sections deleted<00:52:03.079
• ><c> those</c><00:52:03.240><c> sections</c><00:52:03.559><c> representative</c> deleted those sections

Keywords: 1183, house

Transcript Highlights:

• Oh, Senator, I'm trying to understand your question about section three.
• 3 and the proviso in that paragraph. question about section three section question about section three
• we look at the same section three the section<00:15:32.639><c> three</c><00:15:33.079><c> in</c><00:15
• </c><00:15:46.600><c> 3</c> yeah the second paragraph of Section 3 yeah the second paragraph of Section
• </c> amendments recommended by Deb in section amendments recommended by Deb in section two<00:36:37.599

Keywords: 912, senate, all

Summary: The joint hearing covered three measures on the 1 p.m. agenda. SB 817, relating to out-of-state offices, drew support from DBEDT and several community groups, with questions focused on the requested funding, staffing level, whether the office would expand broadly, and whether the Philippines was being singled out. SB 1578, relating to international affairs, received support from DBEDT and the Attorney General, with the chair noting the bill was intended to help DBEDT analyze Hawaii’s international partnerships and plan next steps. SB 1639, establishing Hawaii Beach Day, had limited testimony and was moved along without substantive debate. SB 582, relating to DBEDT, was also heard with support from state agencies and a few individuals, and was described as a vehicle for organizational and funding changes affecting the State Foundation on Culture and the Arts, including moving some positions and programming to general funds and narrowing the works-of-art special fund's uses. The committees then took up recommendations. All three measures were advanced with amendments: SB 817 was amended to include technical changes and a defective effective date of July 1, 2025; SB 1578 was amended to address the Attorney General’s concerns, make the commission subject to Senate confirmation, and add technical changes and a defective date; and SB 582 was amended to incorporate provisions from SB 1577, clarify SFCA authority over performing arts, shift SFCA positions and programming to general funds, restrict the works-of-art special fund, and add a defective date. Each committee voted to adopt the chair’s recommendations, with no reservations or no votes noted in the Transportation and Culture and the Arts committee and only Senator Dela Cruz voting no on SB 817 there; in the Economic Development and Tourism committee, SB 817 passed with Senator Kim in reservation and Senator Awa voting no, while SB 1578 and SB 582 passed with Senator Awa voting no. The later 10:00 a.m. agenda hearing focused on SB 1589, relating to the stadium development special fund, and SB 1629, relating to taxation. On SB 1589, the Attorney General asked for clarification of section 3, particularly the proviso about remaining monies lapsing to the general fund if the New Aloha Stadium Entertainment District is terminated before completion; the interim stadium manager explained the bill would allow spending of $49.5 million already in the special fund for consultant, construction management, quality assurance, and contingency costs. On SB 1629, testimony was sharply divided: supporters, including film industry and business representatives, said the measure would support local film production, restore prior GET treatment, and help attract studio development; opponents argued the bill was vague, overly favorable to a specific project, and lacked oversight and accountability. The hearing ended with extensive questioning about whether the bill was effectively tailored to a particular studio project and how it related to other film tax credit measures, but no final committee action on SB 1589 or SB 1629 was included in the transcript excerpt.

Transcript Highlights:

• </c> sorry, I'm looking for the section here. sorry, I'm looking for the section here.
• </c> desperately trying to find that section desperately trying to find that section as<01:18:04.880>
• </c><01:41:28.320><c> uh</c> I'll go through this, but section uh I'll go through this, but section uh
• </c><02:26:09.040><c> Um,</c> section is is totally fine. Um, section is is totally fine.
• </c> Um but as I said, removing that section Um but as I said, removing that section is<02:27:27.200>

Bills: HB0070, HB0043, HB0103, HB0157, HB0092, SF0092

Keywords: foreign censorship, digital innovation, constitutional rights, Wyoming GRANITE Act, extraterritorial laws, civil actions, speech protection, legal jurisdiction, joint liability, money laundering, illegal investment, financial institutions, criminal activity, Wyoming legislation, First Amendment, free speech, lawsuits, immunity, public participation, strategic lawsuits

Transcript Highlights:

• Section 1, language matters.
• Section 11, Special Commission.
• I'm testifying in support, amended by removing Section 3 and by removing the word "necessary" from Section
• [Speaker continues] ...H. 1981, subject to the removal of Section 3 and the word “necessary” from Section
• And that is the reason why removing Section 3 and the word “necessary” from Section 2 is so important

Keywords: 995, all

Summary: The Joint Committee on the Judiciary held a lengthy public hearing on a wide range of civil rights, immigration, hate crimes, and reparations bills. Chair Edwards and Chair Day opened with strict testimony rules, including two-minute limits, written testimony options, and decorum requirements. Attorney General Andrea Joy Campbell testified in strong support of S. 1126/H. 1920, the Combating Hate in the Commonwealth bill, saying Massachusetts needs stronger tools to address rising hate and bias incidents. Her Civil Rights Division chief explained that the bill would give the division civil investigative demand/subpoena power, expand civil rights enforcement, close loopholes in the Massachusetts Civil Rights Act, add protected classes to the hate crimes law, and require better hate-crime data reporting. The committee also heard support for H. 1954 on access to counsel in immigration proceedings, H. 4684 on law enforcement identification and public trust, and H. 1927 to exonerate individuals accused of witchcraft in colonial Massachusetts. Several bills focused on discrimination and civil rights enforcement. Supporters of S. 1248 on organizational standing said fair housing nonprofits need explicit authority to bring discrimination complaints in their own names, especially as federal protections are under attack. On H. 1246, advocates urged adding sex and gender as protected classes in the hate crimes statute, arguing women are not protected under current state law. H. 1820 drew testimony for protections against height and weight discrimination. H. 1995 would regularize sentencing for hate crimes by requiring diversity awareness training for both convictions and continuances without a finding, and H. 1056/H. 1589 would broaden hate-crime victim standing and require restitution to be used to repair harm. H. 1886 would clarify that defense-based social service staff are exempt from mandated reporter obligations when working under attorney-client privilege. The committee also heard testimony on H. 1889/S. 1064, a bill to eliminate disparate impact. Environmental justice advocates, fair housing attorneys, and community members argued that neutral policies can still produce discriminatory outcomes and that Massachusetts should allow state-court claims and a private right of action to address them. Committee members raised concerns about litigation floodgates, punitive damages, and the scope of protected classes, while supporters said the bill would mainly target systemic harms and injunctive relief. Additional testimony supported H. 1922/S. 119, the Fair Investment Act, which would create civil rights protections in venture capital and other investment settings for founders and investors, especially women and minority entrepreneurs. The hearing also included testimony on H. 1683, the Sex Trade Survivor Act, which would expand vacatur and expungement relief for trafficking survivors, remove archaic offenses from the code, and create an interagency commission; supporters emphasized reducing barriers to housing, employment, and reentry. Finally, the committee heard extensive support for H. 1753/S. 1181, establishing a commission to study reparations in Massachusetts. Testifiers described the state’s history of slavery, redlining, and ongoing racial disparities, and urged the committee to report the bill favorably. No votes or final actions were taken during the hearing.

Transcript Highlights:

• Businesses such as my law office, we have to comply with Section 2."
• Businesses such as my law office, we have to comply with Section 2."
• "In Section 2, 487N-2, it details specifically what needs to be done.
• </c><01:37:15.679><c> 4</c> intergovernmental Affairs into section 4 intergovernmental Affairs into section
• </c><01:41:28.840><c> um</c> testimony um by removing that section um testimony um by removing that section

Keywords: 910, house, all

Summary: The committee on Economic Development and Technology heard testimony on several measures, beginning with SB 1343, which would amend quorum requirements for the Small Business Regulatory Review Board. The board chair testified in support, saying it has been difficult to fill all seats and that using active seats for quorum would help the board function more effectively. No opposition or questions were raised, and the committee moved on. The committee then heard SB 1578, which drew mixed testimony. DBEDT supported the measure and the Attorney General suggested inserting preamble language from HB 1025 to provide historical context on the East-West Center. Austin Martin of the Libertarian Party of Hawaiʻi opposed the bill, arguing it could invite improper behavior, create loosely regulated satellite offices, increase foreign influence, and add competition for land ownership. The committee took no vote during the hearing. The bulk of the meeting focused on SB 1641, a measure to establish a Hawaiʻi film commission/authority and related funding and governance structure. DBEDT supported the intent and offered friendly amendments to clarify the distinction between film and media industries, while the Honolulu Film Office and labor representatives from IATSE, Teamsters, and Pride at Work supported the bill but urged changes. Their concerns centered on conflicts of interest, especially having producers on the commission, and they asked for more labor representation and clearer oversight rules. The Attorney General raised constitutional and special-fund concerns, saying the grant standards and special-fund language needed work. Committee members discussed renaming the entity as a Hawaiʻi Film Authority, broadening its scope beyond cultural production, adjusting the commission makeup, and clarifying funding sources, including the existing film and creative industries fund and the 0.2% rebate contribution. No final vote was taken in the portion provided, but members indicated the bill would need substantial revisions and an HD1.

Transcript Highlights:

• First, the conflict of interest section.
• ,</c> of interest, the foreclosure sections, of interest, the foreclosure sections, and<00:05:05.960>
• </c> DE13 contradict other sections in 515B. DE13 contradict other sections in 515B.
• Section<00:21:34.240><c> five</c> Section five Section five prohibits<00:21:36.120><c> an</c><00:21:36.240
• I know. of this section of the bill. So, you of this section of the bill.

Bills: SF1750, HF2700, HF1606, HF3356, HF3946, HF3970, HF3658, HF3875, HF2627, SF856, HF1268, HF1338

Keywords: common interest community, CIC, homeowners association, HOA, condominium, planned community, cooperative, unit owner, association board, declarant, declarant control, special declarant rights, assessment lien, foreclosure, late fees, fines, attorney fees, resale disclosure, annual report, maintenance plan

Transcript Highlights:

• We're seeing that in section two of the bill.
• We're seeing that in section two of the bill.
• We're seeing that in section two of the bill.
• We're seeing that in section two of the bill.
• We're seeing that in section two of the bill.

Bills: HF1007, HF1152, HF1671, HF2258

Keywords: tourism, World Junior Hockey Championships, funding, economic impact, sports events, Minnesota, economic development, livability, marketing, partnerships, labor and industry, electrical licensing, electrical inspection, continuing education, online course approval, Internet continuing education, power limited technician, maintenance electrician, master electrician, technology circuits

Transcript Highlights:

• Also, in Section 22 of, it'll be...
• In Section 22 of LB 1209, I'm adding an extra section at the very end.
• That section transfers $5 million back to the tobacco settlement cash fund.
• in Section 8, and extensive reporting requirements in Sections 3 and 16.
• Senator Merman, we've moved on vote cloture pursuant to Rule 7, Section 10.

Bills: LB878, LB958, LB958A, LB762, LB1187, LB966, LB929, LB962, LB1209, LB937A, LB962A, LB1050, LB1050A, LB965, LB1022, LB753, LB788, LB913, LB1055, LB1195, LB429, LB721, LB722, LB727, LB745, LB749, LB778, LR293, LR296, LR422, LR495, LR496, LR497, LR498, LR499, LR500, LR501, LR502, LR503, LR504

Keywords: paid parental leave, state employees, workplace benefits, family support, economic impact, Medicaid, Medical Assistance Act, home and community-based services waiver, HCBS waiver, waiver participant, assessment tool, clinical interviewing, service tier, retroactive coverage, doula, doula reimbursement, maternal health, prenatal care, pregnancy, birth outcomes

Transcript Highlights:

• did offer a suggested definition for an existing term in the bill as well as suggested additional section
• section C5, and add some definitions for clarity.
• 2, subsection D3, terms, strike section 2, subsection D3, clarify<00:04:20.479><c> section</c><00:04
• </c><00:12:47.680><c> 13</c> and also amending section 13 and also amending section 13 off<00:12:50.399
• </c><00:15:53.360><c> 3</c> um, potential redundancy of sections 3 um, potential redundancy of sections

Bills: SB3326, SB2911

Keywords: renewable energy, energy storage, cost reduction, public utilities commission, Hawaii energy policies, intoxicating liquor, direct shipment, breweries, distilleries, Hawaii, 912, senate, all

Summary: The committees heard SB 3001 on artificial intelligence in a joint Commerce and Consumer Protection/Labor and Technology hearing. Testimony included support from the Department of Education and Google, comments from the Office of Consumer Protection and the Attorney General’s office, and late opposition from Agentic LLC. The Attorney General raised constitutional and vagueness concerns and suggested clarifying amendments, while Google said the bill’s risk-based approach and proposed amendments could help establish industry-wide safety standards for minors. The committees recessed and then voted to pass SB 3001 with amendments, adopting DCCA/OCP recommendations on data minimization for minors and UDAP clarity, the Attorney General’s proposed clarifications and deletions, and Google’s nonconflicting amendments; the effective date was deferred to July 1, 2050. The vote passed unanimously among members present, with some members excused. The Commerce and Consumer Protection committee then took up several previously heard measures in decision-making. SB 2045 on combat sports passed with amendments reflecting DCCA and boxing commission recommendations, including clarifying the on-site medical professional requirement, reporting duties, promoter payment, removal of the combat sports registry and ambulance requirement, and other technical changes; the effective date was deferred to July 1, 2050. SP 2347 on the residential landlord-tenant code passed with amendments striking landlord requirements so OCP could work on a multilingual tenant-rights notice, and SP 2495 on consumer protection passed with amendments requiring OCP to publish an annual report on potential code violations. SB 2777 on insurance was deferred to February 17, 2026 for further decision-making. At a later CPN decision-making agenda, SB 2471 and SB 2829, both relating to the powers of artificial persons, passed with amendments clarifying the preamble, removing language about foreign artificial persons, and making other consistency and non-substantive changes; both effective dates were moved to January 1, 2027. SP 2033 on renewable energy also passed with amendments clarifying the definition of grid-ready homes, cost-sharing provisions, applicability to interconnecting customers, and safety/certification compliance, with the effective date deferred to July 1, 2050. In each case, the committee voted to adopt the recommendations without objections from members present. The committees also heard SB 3000 on insurance, which would authorize the Attorney General to bring civil actions to recover costs and losses tied to climate-attributable harm and future climate risk, including costs incurred by state insurance-related entities. The Insurance Division and Attorney General’s office offered comments seeking clarification and warning about redundancy, implementation issues, possible representation of private insurers, and concurrent litigation concerns. Supporters, including the Center for Climate Integrity, a resident testifier, Sierra Club, and Green America, argued the bill would help shift insurance costs to fossil fuel companies responsible for climate harms and address rising premiums and nonrenewals in Hawaii. Opponents, including the American Petroleum Institute, argued the bill singled out one industry, raised constitutional concerns, and should be deferred because related climate litigation is already pending. The transcript ends with the committee continuing testimony and discussion on SB 3000 and then moving into SB 3326 on energy, where the consumer advocate and Hawaiian Electric opposed the bill’s proposed separation of generation from transmission and distribution, while the PUC stood on written testimony, Retail Merchants of Hawaii supported it, and Life of the Land raised concerns about assumptions and the need for more substance.

Transcript Highlights:

• Namely, what the bill would do under Section 2 is it would preclude the ability to communicate direct
• What's different between this bill and others is really Section 3, which is that a candidate who believes
• Most notably, though, is that Section 3, subsection 3, at the conclusion of the investigation, a written
• Most notably, though, is that Section 3, subsection 3, at the conclusion of the investigation, a written
• Adding an investigatory piece in Section 3, specifically a two-fold investigatory piece with a required

Keywords: 909, all

Transcript Highlights:

• Um, so I believe that in under Section 1, they, they utilize the term anticipation note to pay, um, just
• I think what this Section 1 gets at is the situation in Amarillo where they, they were utilizing tax
• Uh, so the certificates of obligation, I believe, would be covered under Section 2. Uh, on page 2.
• Um, my understanding is section 1, relates to the tax notes, Section 2 is the CEO portion.
• , put those into the CEO section as well, because we will never build a jail with GOs in this state.

Transcript Highlights:

• But we also need to make sure that it's getting put into the same sections as, because 2156, the campaign
• finance one, which is Sean Cleary's bill, creates a whole new section of code.
• The governor has his special counsel, but I think there's a separate section that gives him the exemption
• Yeah, so it would say, notwithstanding any other provisions of the section, if attorney is employed by
• And then within this section, then, that we leave the governor in, take out the Agriculture Commissioner

Keywords: 908, all

Summary: The Senate State and Local Government Committee reconvened and reviewed the status of several bills. The chair said bill 1377 could not be acted on until the House finished work on campaign finance bill 2156, and bill 1535 likely would not be ready because of unresolved concerns from Representative Davis and planned meetings with Highway Patrol and BCI. The committee therefore focused on bill 1601, which dealt with when the Attorney General may refuse or revoke special assistant attorney general appointments for certain state offices and entities. Members debated the policy and constitutional implications of the bill, including whether it was solving a real problem or creating a potential conflict, and whether statewide elected officials and independent bodies should have their own counsel. After testimony from the Chief Deputy Attorney General clarifying current law and the appropriations process, the committee amended the bill to add the Ethics Commission to the list of entities and to narrow the affected offices to the Governor, State Auditor, and Ethics Commission. The committee also changed one provision from “and” to “or” to clarify the standard for refusal or revocation. The committee then approved the bill as amended on a 6-0 vote and designated Senator Braunberger as the carrier. The chair said the committee would not meet the next morning and would instead reconvene the following week at the call of the chair.

Transcript Highlights:

• Sections 2 through 4 come from Representative Olson's House File 2338, and this relates to the state
• Moving to the bottom of page 13, this is the second section of To MDV's access to the Maxis database.
• Section 9 at the bottom of page 14.
• This is the first section of Chair Representative Cha's bill to recognize veterans of the secret war
• Moving to the bottom of page 18, section 12 is a provision for From the underlying bill, which is the

Transcript Highlights:

• It used to be Section F; now it's Section G.
• is that Section 11 that you're referring to, Senator Smith.
• , and you would be captured under the membership section.
• So let me find some more with section 13.
• Please look closely at Section 8 and Section 3 of the strike-all.

Summary: The committee first considered CS/SB 536, which updates Florida’s criminal gang statutes to reflect modern gang recruitment and communication methods, including social media and encrypted messaging. Senator Martin said the bill does not criminalize gang membership, but clarifies definitions used for gang-related enhancements and law enforcement investigations. Members raised concerns about the meaning of “observed in the company” of gang members and possible impacts on businesses and bikers; Martin said the language was not intended to reach ordinary business customers and that the bill still requires other criteria. The committee adopted the amendment and reported the bill favorably after debate, with some members supporting it and others warning it was still too broad. The committee also approved CS/SB 762, allowing cross-jurisdictional assignment of conflict capital cases with cost and reporting requirements, after an amendment emphasizing judicial economy and geographic proximity; the bill was described as a cost-saving measure and was reported favorably. CS/SB 1742, creating a new offense for indecent exposure or sexual acts directed at minors under 16, was amended to align with the House version and to cover observing a child for sexual gratification, then reported favorably. CS/SB 1750, increasing penalties and mandatory minimums for serious sex crimes and child sexual abuse material offenses, was amended to restore some current-law provisions and limit reclassification to offenders who were 18 or older at the time of the offense, then reported favorably. The committee also approved CS/SB 1582 on statewide data sharing for secondhand dealer and pawnbroker transactions, along with its companion public-records bill SB 1792, both described as theft-prevention and law-enforcement tools with confidentiality protections and stakeholder support. CS/SB 500, providing FDLE protective security for major-party nominees for statewide constitutional offices, was also reported favorably after a technical amendment. The longest and most contentious discussion was on CS/SB 1632, which would create a process for Florida to designate foreign and domestic terrorist organizations, restrict courts from enforcing foreign or religious law when it conflicts with state or federal law, and bar public funds from supporting designated organizations. Senator Graal said the bill targets conduct, not belief, and creates due-process protections through written findings, public notice, cabinet action, and judicial review. Senator Smith and Senator Polsky repeatedly questioned whether the bill’s use of terms like “promotion” could chill protected speech, academic debate, protest activity, or legal representation, and whether the designation process could be used politically or against religious and advocacy groups. Graal said promotion was meant to cover support for illegal acts, not mere disagreement or academic speech, and said she was open to clarifying language. Numerous speakers opposed the bill, arguing it was vague, unconstitutional, and likely to be used against Muslim communities, students, nonprofits, and dissenting political speech; a few supporters argued it was needed for public safety and to prevent state support for terrorism. The committee did not take a final vote on CS/SB 1632 in the portion provided, and the transcript ends during public testimony on that bill.

Transcript Highlights:

• Taiwan pursuant to the 1979 Taiwan Relations Act, Public Law 96-8, United States Code, Title 22, Section
• As Article 4, Section B of the Taiwan Relations Act stipulates that wherever the laws of the United States
• </c> 22 Section 3301. 22 Section 3301.
• As<00:13:43.560><c> Article</c><00:13:43.920><c> 4</c><00:13:44.200><c> Section</c><00:13:44.680><c>
• B</c><00:13:45.080><c> of</c><00:13:45.200><c> the</c><00:13:45.320><c> Taiwan</c> As Article 4, Section

Keywords: 1183, house