Transcript Highlights:

• and economic development, battle air pollution, and advance our climate goals.
• The infrastructure to test... The infrastructure to test and repair these vehicles is disappearing.
• Main Street was economic development for our city in Huntington Beach, and many of the coast of Orange
• The problem is that many of these rail lines are operating on infrastructure that is decades old, and
• Many of these short-line railroads are operating on infrastructure that's over 100 years old in some

Keywords: 987, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• Finally, for the state to remain competitive, it requires a stronger research and development infrastructure
• infrastructure.
• Just two more real quick questions um with the CTE development, do y'all actually work with TEA to develop
• Universities's infrastructure is a direct determinant of student success.
• Um, on the Texas state, um, You mentioned research and development and so forth.

Transcript Highlights:

• future to uh support infrastructure future to uh support infrastructure projects<01:27:21.120>
• > on<01:29:53.520> the infrastructure uh addition on the infrastructure uh addition on
• paying for some of our infrastructure paying for some of our infrastructure and<01:35:02.000>
• commercial development within St. Paul. commercial development within St. Paul.
• crucial tool for economic development crucial tool for economic development and<01:42:53.440>

Keywords: 1187, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• Data centers will be critical infrastructure for the innovative technologies of the future, and innovation
• Data centers will be critical infrastructure for the innovative technologies of the future, and innovation
• Data centers will be critical infrastructure for the innovative technologies of the future, and innovation
• Data centers will be critical infrastructure for the innovative technologies of the future, and innovation
• <00:10:08.040> in engagement in data center Development in engagement in data center Development

Keywords: 1183, house

Transcript Highlights:

• access to capital fund for their development.
• Do we have any conditional clause prohibiting such a thing, developing?
• They will not be for commercial development of the property. Good. Thank you.
• So is there any, did I miss any amount set aside for water development, water storage development?
• So James Newcomb, Deputy Director for Natural Infrastructure, Department of Water Resources.

Keywords: 987, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• <00:14:32.320> Innovative their uh goal is to develop Innovative their uh goal is to develop
• in development in development now<00:14:43.320> and<00:14:43.519> these<00:14:43.720
• Some of them may already have developed a component of intellectual property in their development, or
• Some of them may already have developed a component of intellectual property in their development, or
• Some of them may already have developed a component of intellectual property in their development, or

Keywords: 1183, house

Summary: The House Higher Education Finance and Policy Committee met and approved the minutes from the previous meeting. The chair noted that agency overviews from the Office of Higher Education and other state agencies were not available, so the committee proceeded with University of Minnesota presentations instead. The committee also reviewed posted committee rules. University of Minnesota representatives gave an overview of the university’s research enterprise, describing it as a system of five campuses with a possible expansion to St. Cloud, and highlighting research strengths across campuses in agriculture, energy, natural resources, health, and the Twin Cities flagship campus. They said the university has more than $1.3 billion in annual research expenditures, receives most of its research funding from federal sources, and is ranked highly for both overall research and interdisciplinary research. Examples discussed included the Clinical and Translational Science Institute, the Forever Green initiative, and research tied to sustainable crops, health, and commercialization. Members asked questions about specific research areas, including biodegradable or renewable plastics, wheat research, food dyes, health and environmental toxins, and the market for winter camelina and winter pennycress. University staff said they could follow up with more detailed information and explained that the winter crop work is intended to become market-driven over time, while also improving soil health and creating new revenue streams for farmers. They also clarified that the university’s federal research funding includes money from NIH, NSF, DOE, DOD, and other agencies, and that the “other” funding category includes foundations, subawards, and internal university seed funding. The committee then heard a second University of Minnesota presentation focused on partnerships, commercialization, and workforce development. Testimony highlighted collaborations with industry and government partners such as U.S. Steel, 3M, Medtronic, Cisco, and defense-related industry leaders, as well as programs supporting microelectronics, AI, cybersecurity, and sustainable aviation fuels. No formal votes were taken beyond approving the minutes, and the committee ended the segment by moving on to the next testifier.

Transcript Highlights:

• basically halt all housing development basically halt all housing development in<01:21:26.239>
• Of course, larger developers still need to deal with health, safety, and infrastructure issues, so those
• ,<03:59:03.760> but >> you're saying developer, but >> you're saying developer
• > multif developers wealthy by developing multif developers wealthy by developing multif family<04
• when they've made those infrastructure when they've made those infrastructure investments<04:40:

Keywords: 928, house, all

Summary: The subcommittee first took up House Bill 1598 and an amendment, 2026-0463H. Elliott Barry and Nick Norman testified that the amendment reflected a hard-fought compromise balancing concerns from all sides, and they urged no further changes. With no questions from members, the subcommittee voted unanimously to recommend the bill with the amendment to the full committee, 3-0, and closed the subcommittee. The housing committee then moved through several executive session bills. HB 1010 was amended with 2026-0274H, described as clarifying and implementing prior housing law (HB 631) governing residential units above office and retail space; the amendment was adopted unanimously and the bill was reported ought to pass as amended on a 17-0 vote and placed on consent. HB 65 was then voted ought to pass and also placed on consent, with members saying it was duplicative of the compromise reached on HB 1010. HB 1349 was reconsidered for a clarifying vote and again received unanimous support for its prior disposition, 17-0, and was placed on consent. The committee next took up HB 1523, which concerned homeowners associations. An amendment, 2026-0380H, removed Section 5’s Attorney General enforcement mechanism, added HOA conflict-of-interest approval language, and delayed the effective date to give stakeholders more time; it was adopted unanimously. The bill then passed 18-0 as amended and was put on consent. The committee also voted ITL on CACR 16, a constitutional amendment related to sleeping or homelessness issues, after debate over unintended consequences and whether it protected a basic right; the vote was 10-8, with a majority report assigned and a minority report to be written. Later, HB 108, dealing with inclusionary zoning, was voted ITL 10-8 after members argued the bill imposed unrealistic burdens and could halt development; a minority report was noted with amendment 0149H. HB 7, concerning ADUs and restrictive covenants, was also voted ITL 10-8 after discussion of unintended consequences and a proposed amendment to encourage second ADUs; it was sent to the regular calendar with a minority report and amendment 0289H. HB 1120, on water-related subdivision requirements, was ITL’d 17-1 and placed on consent, with one member noting a study amendment had been offered. HB 1143, addressing housing-provider obligations and municipal enforcement powers, was ITL’d 17-1 and placed on consent. Finally, HB 1145, a fee/tax proposal tied to housing development, was ITL’d 11-7; members debated whether it would discourage development, and a minority report was assigned.

Transcript Highlights:

• Welcome to this morning's Assembly Committee on Economic Development, Growth, and Household Impact hearing
• California's transition to an electrified economy, combined with aging grid infrastructure and a fragile
• Grid Manufacturing Initiative within GO-Biz to address supply chain delays for critical grid infrastructure
• comes to these three goals, probably the most strategic sector for building high-road economic development
• So we're talking about a level of economic development impact that's really not comparable to what we

Summary: The Assembly Committee on Economic Development, Growth, and Household Impact heard AB 2516 by Assemblymember Petrie-Norris, which would create the California Grid Manufacturing Initiative within GO-Biz. The author and supporters said the bill is intended to address supply chain delays and rising costs for critical grid equipment, speed clean energy deployment, improve reliability, and encourage in-state manufacturing and high-road jobs. Support came from labor and industry representatives including UAW, IBEW, the California Labor Federation, CWA District 9, BlueGreen Alliance, California Labor for Climate Jobs, TURN, and Ingersoll Rand; no opposition was registered. Committee members raised affordability concerns, and the bill was moved to Appropriations and passed 7-1. The committee also heard ACR 173 by Assemblymember Carrillo, which would formalize a sister-state relationship between California and Jalisco, Mexico. Carrillo emphasized cultural, economic, and demographic ties, cooperation on issues such as agriculture, labor, technology, and education, and immigrant protections. There were no witnesses in opposition, and the resolution was adopted. The consent calendar included AB 2163 by Gonzalez and ACR 164 by Bains and ACR 166 by Avila Farías, all of which were approved. After quorum was established, the committee took roll, recorded multiple aye votes from absent members, and then adjourned after reporting all items out.

Transcript Highlights:

• How can we develop a more intentional collaboration?
• How are we developing referral systems, infrastructure, and communities?
• Development of the Strength Building Program.
• sessions and considerations in the development of all...
• The caucus, CLBC, obstructed historic reparations infrastructure bills.

Keywords: 988, house, all

Transcript Highlights:

• We will call the Energy Development and Transmission Committee, Good morning, committee.
• Because I'd love to see the coal develop with that.
• to residential developments and a lot of other stuff.
• their infrastructure.
• , and communities regarding infrastructure improvements, workforce development, economic benefits, and

Summary: The committee met at the Coteau Freedom Mine in Mercer County, approved the June 2 minutes, and heard an overview of the mine from Coteau Properties president Andrew Hawbaker. He described the Freedom Mine as the largest lignite mine in the United States, supplying coal to Dakota Gasification, Antelope Valley Station, and Leland Olds Station. He emphasized the mine’s scale, safety record, reclamation work, workforce needs, community involvement, and economic impact, including payroll, taxes, royalties, scholarships, and local hiring. Members asked about how long land stays in production, how quickly it returns to agriculture after reclamation, labor shortages, and how mining affects groundwater and water wells. Hawbaker said most tracts are mined for about three to five years, reclamation is coordinated with landowners, and the company continues to struggle to find electricians, welders, mechanics, operators, and engineers. The committee then heard from Public Service Commission Chairman Randy Christman on coal mining reclamation and permitting. He reviewed North Dakota’s coal mining history, the state’s reclamation laws, federal Surface Mining Control and Reclamation Act primacy, bonding, permit renewals and revisions, prohibited mining areas, inspection and enforcement, and contemporaneous reclamation requirements. Christman stressed that North Dakota’s program is professional and thorough, with frequent inspections, financial assurance, and a 10-year revegetation monitoring period before bond release. He also discussed federal coal ownership issues that can delay mine plans, the treatment of prime farmland, and how reclamation differs for wind and pipelines. In response to questions, he said one challenge is sometimes releasing land too soon before long-term compaction issues are fully understood, and he noted that data centers do not currently have a comparable reclamation model because they typically own the land. In the afternoon, the committee received an update from Lignite Energy Council president Jonathan Fortner on the lignite industry. He said North Dakota’s lignite sector supports five commercial power plants, four mines, about 12,000 direct and indirect jobs, and more than $5.5 billion in economic activity, while helping keep the state’s electricity rates among the lowest in the nation. Fortner reviewed coal severance and conversion tax revenues, the lignite research fund, federal regulatory rollbacks, carbon capture policy, and the industry’s legal costs fighting federal rules. He also highlighted a study on large-load development, saying new data centers and critical mineral processing facilities could create major local tax revenue and help justify new baseload generation. Members asked whether new gas pipelines would crowd out coal plant development and whether the economic study included jobs and broader local impacts; Fortner said the industry sees room for both and that the study did include construction, operations, jobs, and tax effects.

Transcript Highlights:

• AB 372, Bennett, rural water infrastructure: do pass on an A roll call.
• AB 1448, Hart, oil and gas development: do pass out on a B roll call.
• AB 1448, Hart, oil and gas development: do pass out on a B roll call.
• AB 472, Rogers, wind energy infrastructure needs: holding committee.
• AB 941, Zbur, Electrical Infrastructure Permitting: holding committee.

Summary: The Assembly Appropriations Committee held its May 23, 2025 suspense hearing and opened by emphasizing the difficult budget environment, rising costs for constituents, and the need to make tough choices. The chair said many bills would be held, amended to reduce costs, or made two-year bills because the state could not afford broad program expansions this year. The committee also noted the agenda was organized alphabetically by author and that results would be posted later that day. The committee then acted on a large suspense file, taking up hundreds of Assembly bills across topics including housing, health care, education, labor, public safety, climate, water, transportation, elections, and technology. Many bills were held in committee, while many others were approved with cost-saving, clarifying, or author’s amendments. Examples included measures on CalABLE, Covered California enrollment, wildfire and insurance issues, reproductive health, school and college programs, prison and juvenile justice matters, AI and data privacy, and local government and utility regulation. Several bills were converted to two-year bills to continue discussion. Throughout the hearing, the committee repeatedly voted on bills by A roll call or B roll call, often with Republicans not voting on amended measures. Some bills were advanced with notable amendments, such as narrowing scope, removing appropriations, delaying implementation, or striking costly provisions. The committee also approved a number of committee bills and omnibus measures, including emergency management, judiciary, insurance, and water-related bills. At the end of the hearing, the chair stated that the committee had moved 435 bills to the Assembly floor, either as do pass or do pass as amended, and adjourned the meeting.

Transcript Highlights:

• development.
• This would apply the tourist development taxes as well as local option sales taxes.
• That would be a drastic overhaul of tdt. >> And our towards developing councils.
• They put stress on our infrastructure. Sometimes they even commit crimes.
• destination infrastructure, to create to create destination infrastructure, to create more workforce

Keywords: 999, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• . our our infrastructure delivery process. our our infrastructure and<00:27:14.559> systems<00
• <00:28:29.440> So, plans to develop the develop rates.
• So, plans to develop the develop rates.
• You know, it's it's um developed<00:28:50.799> understanding<00:28:51.279> the developed
• <01:12:07.920> to based services and and infrastructure to based services and and infrastructure

Keywords: 928, house, all

Summary: The Committee to Study Long-Term Managed Care met to approve prior minutes and outline its schedule, with meetings set for September 24 and September 29 ahead of an October 1 report deadline. The chair said the committee would use the first two meetings to digest testimony, likely ask follow-up questions of DHS, and then work toward conclusions and a report format. The minutes from the previous meeting were approved unanimously. The main testimony came from Sharon Alexander of Amera Health, who argued in favor of moving from fee-for-service Medicaid long-term services and supports to a managed LTSS model. She described managed LTSS as a capitated, quality-driven system used in about 26 states, and said it can improve care coordination, accountability, access to home- and community-based services, and budget predictability. She cited Amera Health’s experience in Pennsylvania and Delaware, including care coordination, housing and transportation support, caregiver programs, and quality benchmarks tied to state oversight. She also said nursing facilities would remain an important option for people who need that level of care. Committee members asked about how the programs are administered, how rates are set, how care managers work, and how quality is measured. Alexander said states contract with managed care organizations at actuarially sound capitated rates, with annual contracts, reporting, and oversight. She explained that care managers typically conduct quarterly assessments and follow up after trigger events such as hospitalization, and that housing coordinators may assist with transitions to the community. On quality, she said states use CMS-related and HCBS benchmark measures covering service timeliness, care planning, transitions, and other outcomes, and that New Hampshire could build on existing metrics rather than starting from scratch. She also noted that rural areas face workforce and transportation challenges, which managed care plans try to address through technology and self-direction options.

Transcript Highlights:

• will put on my hat as a developer will put on my hat as a developer working<00:31:52.399> with
• <00:43:02.079> through through War Force development through through War Force development
• /c><00:43:04.280> energy Economic Development using these energy Economic Development using these
• existing distribution infrastructure existing distribution infrastructure that<00:58:33.240>
• happening if you're a smaller developer happening if you're a smaller developer and<01:36:10.960

Keywords: 1187, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• We were told we get $5 million for the project, building up the project and infrastructure, and then
• ><00:36:07.040> an recommends the commission developing an recommends the commission developing
• . developed. developed.
• <00:37:33.440> a<00:37:33.760> baseline commission develop a baseline commission develop
• access to the nextg revoke developers access to the nextg production<00:38:14.800> environment.

Keywords: 1189, house, all

Summary: The committee first approved the June 20, 2025 minutes, with several members abstaining, and then adopted the consent calendar after removing items 223 and 224 under tab five, item 222 under tab six, and item 231 under tab seven. The committee also noted that an old business item related to YDC claims administration would be removed at a future meeting because the fiscal year had closed and no further committee action was needed. The main substantive discussion centered on Department of Health and Human Services requests. Item FIS-223 would fund a shared database between the Department of Education and HHS to identify children eligible for the summer EBT program; members asked whether it could also help with Medicaid or school reimbursement tracking, but the witness said the item was specifically for summer EBT and that broader integration questions would need follow-up with Education and Medicaid staff. The committee then adopted the item, with Representative Mooney voting no. Item FIS-224 concerned the phrase "high quality services" in child care-related funding; HHS said the standards come from the federal Office of Child Care, and the committee adopted the item. Item FIS-222 related to Money Follows the Person; HHS explained it is a 100% federally funded program that supports transitions from institutions to community living with services such as housing navigation, furnishings, and case management. Members questioned the scale and cost of the program, and HHS said the initial federal award was $5 million, with additional federal IT funding later approved; the committee adopted the item, again with Representative Mooney voting no. Under tab seven, the committee discussed item 231 involving ARPA funds and the YDC project. The Department of Administrative Services explained that recent Treasury guidance allows leftover ARPA dollars from approved projects to be repurposed only for additional work on already approved projects, not new projects. Members asked about whether the project was over budget and whether some items had been in the original plan; officials said the work reflected add alternates from the original bid and that the project was on track to meet the deadline. The committee adopted the item. The meeting then moved to the audit presentation on the New Hampshire Liquor Commission’s fiscal year 2024 management letter, which identified 13 internal control comments, including two material weaknesses, largely tied to the new NextG system. Recommendations included strengthening controls, formal risk assessment, reconciliations to New Hampshire First, cash receipt controls, subsidiary ledgers, SOC reports for vendors, internal audit functions, lease accounting, gift card breakage reporting, and IT security and access controls. The Liquor Commission said it concurred with most findings, described the system transition as successful overall, and said remediation would continue; committee members asked for estimated completion dates for audit findings and discussed the need for more regular follow-up on audit issues and budget monitoring.

Transcript Highlights:

• authorizing energy infrastructure authorizing energy infrastructure construction<02:52:23.680>
• building energy infrastructure building energy infrastructure connecting<02:55:50.479> our
• in May, that delay cost the developer in May, that delay cost the developer $955<03:08:03.279>
• <04:16:06.800> rules this by requiring FK to develop rules this by requiring FK to develop
• the turbines and the the infrastructure the turbines and the the infrastructure to<04:26:10.239>

Keywords: U.S. House of Representatives Floor Proceedings on Thursday, September 18, 2025, 1012, house, all

Transcript Highlights:

• THE CITIZENS OF FLORIDA MADE IT CLEAR YOU DO NOT WANT TO SEE OUR STATE PARKS DEVELOPED.
• AT THE SAME TIME OVER 100 ACRES ARE BEING DEVELOPED EVERY DAY.
• THEY BELONG TO THE PEOPLE, NOT TO DEVELOPERS.
• IT IS NOT LOST ON ME THAT THERE ARE DEVELOPERS WHO SEE OPPORTUNITY.
• THIS IS REALLY ABOUT THE INFRASTRUCTURE CAPITAL INVESTMENTS IN THE FACILITIES.

Keywords: 999, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• The projections are ultimately used to support climate-resilient development and climate-resilient infrastructure
• The projections are ultimately used to support climate-resilient development and climate-resilient infrastructure
• The projections are ultimately used to support climate-resilient development and climate-resilient infrastructure
• and housing development. ...because roads are important infrastructure necessary to help with rebuilding
• and infrastructure and housing and development. development. development.

Keywords: 910, house, all

Transcript Highlights:

• To the region with its general development plan.
• who were developing around there.
• And so when... ...developers who were developing around there.
• It's about urban infill development. We're not suburban sprawl.
• It also is generally in places that are already developed.

Summary: The Assembly Committee on Housing and Community Development heard a long agenda focused mainly on housing production, higher education facilities, homelessness, and permitting reform. Early items included AB 6, which would direct HCD to convene a working group on allowing three- to ten-unit “missing middle” housing to be built under the Residential Code rather than the Building Code; AB 48, a higher education bond proposal that would fund campus repairs, modernization, disaster recovery, and student/employee housing; and AB 76, which would clarify a Chula Vista university innovation district exemption so the project can include academic buildings and housing without conflicting with surplus land rules. Supporters emphasized affordability, cost savings, student housing needs, and access to education, while members raised questions about implementation, affordability requirements, and project scope. The committee later took votes on these items, with AB 6, AB 48, and AB 76 all moving forward on unanimous or near-unanimous votes to Appropriations. Members also heard AB 595, which would create a state homeownership tax credit pilot to support affordable for-sale housing. The author and supporters argued that California’s homeownership rate is at historic lows and that the bill would help close racial wealth gaps by financing homes working families can buy. The committee approved AB 595 and sent it to Appropriations. The consent calendar, including several other housing-related bills, was also approved unanimously. A major portion of the hearing was devoted to AB 1165, the California Housing Justice Act of 2025, which would require ongoing state investment and a financing plan to address homelessness and housing affordability. The author and witnesses described the scale of homelessness, the limits of one-time funding, and the need for sustained, accountable funding streams. After testimony from housing advocates and people with lived experience, the committee passed AB 1165 on a 10-0 vote to Appropriations. Finally, the committee heard AB 609, a CEQA reform bill that would create a simplified exemption for qualifying infill housing projects in already developed areas. Supporters framed it as a targeted way to reduce delays and costs for housing near jobs and transit, while opponents from environmental justice, labor, and tribal groups warned it could reduce public participation, weaken protections for disadvantaged communities, and create consultation concerns for tribal cultural resources. The author said the bill would not change zoning or affordability tools and would continue to work with opponents on amendments. The bill was moved forward after extensive discussion, with members noting ongoing negotiations on tribal consultation and labor concerns.

Transcript Highlights:

• , communication, community development, communication, community development, and<00:04:43.880>
• <01:35:05.000> to you know, this type of development to you know, this type of development
• bidding process by solar developers bidding process by solar developers competing<01:36:00.600><
• To go forward with electric school bus infrastructure programs, developing that and back charging that
• and programs, developing developing that and programs, developing developing that and back<03:31:

Keywords: Senate streaming session for Thursday, April 2, 2026, 960, senate, all

Summary: The Senate convened with a quorum, heard an invocation by Reverend J.C. Austin of Woods Memorial Presbyterian Church, and journalized the prayer. Members also introduced several guests and interns, including a shadow from the 45th District, a Legislative Black Caucus fellow, a ninth-grade author from Annapolis High School, a World Autism Acceptance Day group in the gallery, and a student shadowing the Senator from District 30. The chamber then moved to House bills on second reading and Senate bills on third reading. The Senate adopted favorable committee reports and passed several House bills without objection, including measures extending the Maryland Horse Industry Board sunset, requiring housing counseling information for certain first-time homebuyers, expanding the educator expense tax subtraction to full-time pre-K teachers, increasing funding for the State Library Resource Center, extending agricultural use assessment eligibility for community solar projects, allowing the Seat Pleasant Police Department to join the Law Enforcement Officers Pension System, authorizing changes to a tax sale legacy protection program, and granting special taxing authority for the Village of Drummond. The chamber also adopted seven amendments to Senate Bill 1007 on state debt authorizations and ordered it printed for third reading. On final passage, Senate Bill 956 on Maryland Transportation Authority video toll collections passed with 44 affirmative votes. The Senate then took up Senate Bill 841, a major energy affordability and utility reform bill, with two committee amendments adopted. The bill was described as providing short-, medium-, and long-term rate relief, including changes to EmPOWER Maryland, utility cost recovery, data center tariffs, net metering, solar policy, transmission planning, battery storage, nuclear incentives, and low-income assistance. Debate began on the amended report, and a motion to lay the bill over was withdrawn while members discussed waiting on additional amendments.