Transcript Highlights:

• And so through shared learning, through evaluation, we have a pulse on hospitals who are taking the autonomy
• And so through shared learning, through evaluation, we have a pulse on hospitals who are taking the autonomy
• c><00:26:18.480> through through shared learning through through shared learning through evaluation
• 19.760> a<00:26:19.919> pulse<00:26:20.320> on<00:26:20.640> hospitals evaluation
• we have a pulse on hospitals evaluation we have a pulse on hospitals who<00:26:21.279> are<00

Keywords: 00:00 - Call to Order/Roll Call 01:38 - Discussion of 26RS SCR 9 22:00 - Roll Call Vote on 26RS SCR 9 23:15 - Discussion of 26RS SJR 23 33:20 - Roll Call Vote on 26RS SJR 23 35:18 - Adjournment, 958, all

Summary: The House Standing Committee on Health Services met with a quorum and first heard Senate Concurrent Resolution 9 from Sen. Steve Meredith. He argued that Kentucky’s Medicaid system is too costly and bureaucratic, saying spending has grown dramatically and that managed care organizations do not align with improving health outcomes. His proposal would create a feasibility study for a five-year pilot of an “accountable community healthcare organization” in three area development districts, with a locally owned, nonprofit, provider-driven model intended to reduce costs, address social determinants of health, and keep savings in the community. Members asked about how the model would differ from MCOs, administrative costs, eligibility changes, and implementation costs; Meredith said the model would eliminate preauthorization barriers, rely on provider and community risk-sharing, and could be funded initially through existing grant opportunities. The committee then voted unanimously to report SCR 9 favorably. The committee next took up Senate Joint Resolution 23, the “Food is Medicine” resolution, introduced by Sen. Shelley Funke Frommeyer and Dana Feldman of the Kentucky Department of Agriculture. They described the resolution as part of a broader wellness and rural prosperity effort, emphasizing that nutrition should be treated as part of health care and that Kentucky agriculture can support better health outcomes through local, healthy food. They said the effort grew out of task force work and regional listening sessions and is intended to build a foundation for continued collaboration between hospitals, agriculture, and state agencies. Members expressed support for the concept and the partnership approach, and the discussion highlighted using evaluation and shared learning to expand the initiative.

Transcript Highlights:

• authorized to perform in Kentucky through regulation or legal determination, including the following: evaluating
• following: determination, including the following: determination, including the following: evaluating
• For those of you who may be less familiar with audiology, audiologists evaluate, diagnose, manage, and
• My practice offers the only cochlear implant evaluation and long-term cochlear implant management services
• My practice offers the only cochlear implant evaluation and long-term cochlear implant management services

Keywords: 958, all

Summary: The committee first approved the October 23 meeting minutes and then heard testimony on a planned 2026 bill to modernize Kentucky’s audiology practice act. Witnesses from the Academy of Doctors of Audiology and a Kentucky audiologist said the proposal would largely codify existing authority and add new powers to order certain imaging and lab tests related to auditory and vestibular conditions, as well as prescribe topical ear medications. They argued the changes would reduce delays, especially in rural areas, improve access to hearing and balance care, and help address provider shortages. Committee members asked about evidence for the expansion, responsibility for reviewing imaging results and incidental findings, and whether the changes might affect referrals or scope of practice. The witnesses said they could provide evidence, that the audiologist would be responsible for obtaining and reviewing radiology reports and following up with patients and primary care providers, and that the goal was to speed treatment and streamline referrals when needed. The committee then heard a separate proposal to update the Kentucky Board of Medical Imaging and Radiation Therapy statutes by licensing MRI technologists and diagnostic medical sonographers, who are not currently required to be licensed in Kentucky. The bill would create a transition period through January 1, 2028 for current practitioners, require national credentialing for new applicants after that date, expand the board from 9 to 11 members, and clarify scope and enforcement provisions. Supporters said the measure would improve patient safety, align Kentucky with most other states, and recognize national credentials. Members questioned how many workers would be affected, whether the state currently meets national standards, the cost of licensure, and whether the bill could worsen staffing shortages, especially in rural areas. The witnesses said about 800 MRI technologists and 1,600 sonographers in Kentucky are currently certified, initial licensure would cost $100, and existing licensees would not pay an additional fee. They also said the board viewed the change as a safety measure and noted increasing portability of MRI services across state lines. Finally, the committee began hearing a respiratory care interstate compact proposal. The sponsor and respiratory care representatives described the compact as a way to allow licensed respiratory therapists from member states to practice across state lines. They outlined the profession’s role in hospitals, emergency departments, home care, pulmonary labs, long-term care, and telehealth, and said the compact would help with workforce flexibility and access to care. The transcript cuts off before the discussion concluded or any action was taken on that item.

Transcript Highlights:

• members can use to accomplish that: strategic planning, budgeting, frameworks for superintendent evaluations
• So for that first audit, we evaluated the LEA's management of sensitive materials.
• That's how they're going to be evaluated. That's part of the nature of this course.
• So those were kind of the three policy concepts that were proposed and also evaluated.
• you see some mixed results there, but a lot of these categories indicate a strong preference for evaluating

Keywords: 985, all

Transcript Highlights:

• that was $18.6 million through the Government Results and Opportunity Fund or GROW to pilot and evaluate
• $5.6 million to create a regional on-call response team, $5.4 million over three years to pilot and evaluate
• So, can data be correlated across the board to assess, evaluate performance, and to give us the ability
• the most part three years, and the specific language is around piloting different strategies and evaluating
• in Taos for the Legislative Finance Committee and they wanted, they did a progress report on the evaluation

Transcript Highlights:

• And for 26-27, UC is also expected to grow, but is evaluating its ability to meet the growth targets,
• Education Student Housing Fund program included a set of metrics by which the Legislature would evaluate
• So there were a set of metrics that the Legislature used to evaluate these projects.
• Education Student Housing Fund program included a set of metrics by which the legislature would evaluate
• So there were a set of metrics that the legislature used to evaluate these projects.

Summary: The Assembly Budget Subcommittee on Education Finance held an extended hearing focused primarily on University of California budget issues, enrollment, housing, and Title IX. Chair David Alvarez opened by noting the governor’s proposed 8% ongoing General Fund reduction to UC, the deferral of compact funding, and the College of the Law budget item, while emphasizing that no votes would be taken that day. Public commenters, including UC Davis employees and lecturers, urged restoration of UC funding and opposed the hiring freeze, saying cuts would worsen staffing shortages, reduce research capacity, and harm students and patients. On UC core operations, the Department of Finance said the governor’s budget maintains the compact but defers $240.8 million in ongoing support and continues a planned 7.95% reduction, while the LAO recommended rejecting the deferrals and instead making any changes in the budget year. UC San Diego’s chancellor and UC Office of the President argued the cuts and deferrals would create major campus shortfalls, force hiring freezes, larger class sizes, fewer course offerings, delayed projects, and possible layoffs. Committee members questioned whether cuts could be shifted away from students and toward administration, discussed UCOP reserves and bond debt, and noted that UC’s budget structure makes the campus-level impact larger than the headline reduction. The committee also reviewed enrollment trends and nonresident replacement. The LAO said UC resident enrollment has grown and recommended revisiting 2026-27 targets and pausing the nonresident replacement plan if state funding does not improve. UC said it has exceeded California undergraduate enrollment and nonresident replacement goals, but warned that continued growth without funding would force enrollment reductions and harm quality. Members discussed the role of nonresident and international students, tuition rates, and the value of UC as a pathway for California students and a source of talent for the state. A separate housing item covered the state’s Higher Education Student Housing Grant Program. UC reported that recent bond savings could support additional affordable beds at UC Davis and UC Santa Barbara, but the LAO and Finance noted the Legislature would need to decide how to use the $6.2 million in savings from the original projects. The committee also heard a Title IX update from UC’s systemwide civil rights office, which described campus Title IX structures, training, and policy enforcement, and said the system has been working to improve confidentiality guidance and streamline complaint processes after survey feedback showed confusion and lengthy procedures.

Transcript Highlights:

• We know that all of the farmers that are part of this, it's already proven in the evaluations that we're
• We know that all of the farmers that are part of this, it's already proven in the evaluations that we're
• doing to bring them better I. proven in the evaluations that we're doing to bring them better options
• at the federal level, and so for us, we are committed to tracking those closely and, of course, evaluating
• And we've also seen that through both state and federal evaluations on food security impacts as well

Summary: The joint oversight hearing focused on food insecurity in California and how state and federal nutrition programs, agricultural production, and food distribution systems intersect. Assemblymembers emphasized that many Californians, including farmworkers, seniors, children, and communities of color, remain food insecure despite California’s agricultural abundance. Panelists and members discussed CalFresh, WIC, school meals, Sun Bucks, food banks, and the impact of federal policy changes, including possible nutrition cuts, tariffs, and immigration enforcement, on access to food and the agricultural workforce. Secretary Karen Ross described CDFA programs aimed at improving access to fresh food and supporting local agriculture, including the senior farmers’ market program, California Nutrition Incentive Program, Healthy Refrigeration Grant Program, Community Food Hubs, Farm to School, urban agriculture, and a proposed tribal food sovereignty program. She said these efforts help connect local producers to consumers, expand healthy food access, and build infrastructure such as refrigeration, mobile markets, and aggregation hubs. Department of Social Services Deputy Director Alexis Fernandez Garcia outlined CalFresh, CFAP, Sun Bucks, CACFP, emergency food programs, and tribal nutrition assistance, noting that CalFresh and related programs significantly reduce poverty and food insecurity, but participation gaps remain for non-English speakers, some Asian American communities, and undocumented households. PPIC researcher Tess Thorman presented data showing that 13% of California households experienced food insecurity in 2023, with higher rates among households with children and Latino, Black, and other households. She said nutrition programs reduce poverty and food hardship, but federal rules, income thresholds, immigration restrictions, and high living costs limit their reach. Members asked about simplifying applications, improving call center access, increasing outreach in multiple languages, and adjusting benefits for inflation. Officials said the state has used available federal options to streamline enrollment, improve customer service, and target outreach, but many core rules and benefit levels are set federally. The second panel shifted to food production and market access. A farmer, a UC food systems leader, and a produce distributor described efforts to connect small and medium farms with food banks, schools, universities, and Medi-Cal food-as-medicine programs. They highlighted programs such as Farms Together, the USDA Southwest Regional Food Business Center, Farm to School, food hubs, and climate-smart infrastructure grants as ways to create stable markets for local growers while improving food access. Speakers also raised concerns about land tenure, consolidation, regulatory burdens, labor constraints, and the loss of federal funding, and members discussed whether state investments and Prop. 4 funds could help sustain and expand these efforts.

Transcript Highlights:

• You can understand, we're going to look at this, we're going to evaluate this company; we may do it monthly
• I really do wish we would say specifically how regularly we're going to re-evaluate the investment to
• the state because this may be as little as a five-year investment, and we're only going to evaluate
• You need to have the data about the effectiveness of your teaching that needs to be evaluated.
• mathematical instruction, ongoing professional learning in mathematics, mathematics coaching, and program evaluation

Transcript Highlights:

• Yeah, you have provided a There's a lot of wise observations of the complexity of how to evaluate performance
• And so we evaluate schools in domain two based upon. upon student growth, and you get the better of the
• qualify for a teacher incentive allotment within a district, you just have to have fair teachers. evaluations
• Recently, the current CEO and fourth agent head since the corporation's formation, evaluated and made
• board governance policy. that delineates roles of the board, the committees, the CEO, how the CEO is evaluated

Keywords: 1184, house, all

Transcript Highlights:

• They conduct meetings over the nine-month period during the interim to evaluate competitive proposals
• Proposals are reviewed and evaluated by our members through multiple rounds of scoring.
• 00:08:50.720> and agencies proposals are reviewed and agencies proposals are reviewed and evaluated
• 51.519> by<00:08:51.640> our<00:08:51.800> members<00:08:52.279> through evaluated
• by our members through evaluated by our members through multiple<00:08:52.880> rounds<00:08:53.160

Keywords: 1187, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• But I wanted to also mention that the Title III program evaluation, which is conducted in partnership
• 00:50:37.520> title<00:50:38.000> 3<00:50:38.319> program<00:50:38.800> evaluation
• that the the title 3 program evaluation that the the title 3 program evaluation which<00:50:39.760
• We have barriers to credential re-evaluation, retraining, or reskilling.
• <01:04:18.720> that to complete even the evaluations that to complete even the evaluations

Keywords: 958, all

Summary: The Commission on Race and Access to Opportunity met in September 2025, established a quorum, introduced new member Larry Forester, and approved the minutes from the August 26 meeting. The main presentation came from Warren County Public Schools Superintendent Rob Clayton and Assistant Superintendent Sarah Johnson, who discussed the district’s work serving English language learners and multilingual students, including immigrant and refugee families. They said Warren County now serves roughly 5,500 multilingual students out of about 19,000 total, representing about 92 languages and 90 countries, with 57 certified multilingual teachers, a GO Center, migrant and refugee advocates, and the state’s first international high school. The presenters emphasized that the district welcomes immigrant families and that students and parents generally value public education, but they described major challenges tied to accountability and funding. They explained that multilingual students are tested after one year in the system, even though many need more time to become proficient in English and grade-level standards, and they argued that current graduation-rate rules can unfairly penalize schools when transient students enroll briefly and then leave. They also said the cost of serving this population has risen sharply, with special revenue and especially general-fund spending increasing substantially over the past decade, prompting the district to reallocate resources from EL teacher assistants toward translation technology and additional certified staff. Committee members asked questions about how long-term multilingual students compare with the general student body and whether the district’s data show similar graduation outcomes. Clayton said he did not have the specific comparison data at hand but believed students who stay K-12 generally reach proficiency. He and Johnson asked legislators to consider giving students more time before accountability measures apply and to shift some graduation accountability from individual schools to the district level for highly transient populations, while still maintaining accountability. No formal votes or legislative actions were taken beyond approval of the minutes.

Transcript Highlights:

• include measurable outcomes as defined in section 33.03, subdivision 10, a plan for measuring and evaluating
• include measurable outcomes as defined in section 33.03, subdivision 10, a plan for measuring and evaluating
• include measurable outcomes as defined in section 33.03, subdivision 10, a plan for measuring and evaluating
• include measurable outcomes as defined in section 33.03, subdivision 10, a plan for measuring and evaluating
• include measurable outcomes as defined in section 33.03, subdivision 10, a plan for measuring and evaluating

Keywords: 1183, house

Transcript Highlights:

• The study would evaluate how carbon pricing might influence state energy costs in the short and long
• <00:06:09.000> how economy the study would evaluate how economy the study would evaluate how
• He said that is the evaluation of the externalities versus the benefits that fossil fuels provide for
• He said that is the evaluation of the externalities versus the benefits that fossil fuels provide for
• without fossil fuels and the evaluation without fossil fuels and the evaluation of<00:34:34.919>

Keywords: 1189, house, all

Transcript Highlights:

• So when we're evaluating software or how we're developing something like a digital wallet, do we need
• outside of our direct control, you hear us talk a lot about third-party risk management and the evaluation
• outside of our direct control, you hear us talk a lot about third-party risk management and the evaluation
• brought PeopleSoft in, when we moved from Samus to PeopleSoft, we hired a third-party vendor to evaluate
• We have two tools that we're evaluating right now, but they're both very, very manual.

Summary: The committee received several informational reports from NDIT and DPI. Justin Data reviewed the quarterly major IT project portfolio, noting the portfolio was slightly under budget and behind schedule overall, with three red schedule items: Bed Management System and Vital Records were essentially complete and being closed out, and the Roadway Capital Planning Project was delayed by vendor bug fixes after testing. He also summarized recent project startups and closeouts, including the Victim Notification System, Medicaid data exchange, Highway Patrol’s motor carrier permit system, and several completed HHS and RIMS projects. Members asked for follow-up on ADA compliance work, the public-facing RIO website, and the state’s mainframe retirement timeline, and staff agreed to provide updates later. Craig Falkley reported on coordination of services with political subdivisions and higher education, including StageNet, cybersecurity, radio/911 services, and PeopleSoft coordination. He also explained distributed ledger technology as a tool for transparency and fraud prevention, but said it is not widely used in state government and suggested the report be modernized to focus more broadly on emerging technologies such as AI and cybersecurity. The committee generally agreed that the topic should be updated. Chris Gurgan presented the mandatory cybersecurity incident reporting program created by HB 1314, explaining how agencies and political subdivisions report incidents through NDIT’s website or service desk. He said 77 incidents had been reported since 2021, 47 met the statutory definition, and most were phishing-related; most reported incidents were resolved, with one recent ransomware matter still open. He also reviewed notable incidents since the last report, including the PowerSchool compromise, a SimpleHelp intrusion at a school district, a court intrusion, a WSUS vulnerability, a business email compromise, and a recent ransomware incident involving a non-state critical infrastructure entity. Members asked about recovery of stolen funds, early warning signs, smishing, training, MFA, conditional access, and cybersecurity maturity assessments; Gurgan said the state uses MFA and conditional access, provides awareness training to state employees, and would return with more information on maturity assessments. Tony Ambrose then updated the committee on the K-12 student information system bridge project. He said district implementation of Infinite Campus had begun statewide, but the data migration vendor originally selected was terminated for poor performance and replaced by Aurora Educational Technology, which had experience with similar statewide migrations. He also said DPI is migrating special education data from Tynet into Infinite Campus, and that some SLDS-based tools such as e-transcripts and Choice Ready may not function exactly as they do now at July 1, requiring interim or alternative solutions. Members raised concerns about summer school disruptions, the timing of the cutover, and whether the new system would support existing reporting and transcript functions; DPI said it was working on identity, authentication, data-sharing agreements, and post-go-live integrations, and would continue to refine the plan beyond June 30.

Transcript Highlights:

• And<00:23:44.640> the<00:23:44.800> independent<00:23:45.320> evaluation<00:23:46.200
• > of<00:23:46.360> each And the independent evaluation of each And the independent evaluation
• If the intent is to try to expand into uses, then I think we have to evaluate what's feasible. >> All
• think we try to expand into uses, then I think we have<01:13:15.360> to<01:13:15.440> evaluate
• <01:13:16.560> what's have to evaluate what's have to evaluate what's uh<01:13:17.720>

Bills: SB3326

Keywords: renewable energy, energy storage, cost reduction, public utilities commission, Hawaii energy policies, 910, house, all

Summary: The joint committees on Energy and Environmental Protection and Labor heard SB 3326, a bill concerning a study of separating transmission from generation in Hawaii’s electric system. Testimony was largely opposed. Life of the Land argued that true separation on an isolated island grid has not been shown to work anywhere and said the bill would waste taxpayer money. Hawaiian Electric and the Public Utilities Commission also opposed the measure, saying Hawaii already uses competitive bidding for new generation, that the bill would add cost, complexity, and reliability risks, and that a new study would duplicate prior work. In response to questions, the PUC explained its existing competitive bidding framework and said it had not seen an island system fully restructure in this way. The chair then amended the bill’s intent to require the PUC to open a proceeding for an independent, comprehensive analysis of the state’s energy pathways, including cost reduction, financial risk, state energy goals, and reliability, rather than narrowly focusing on separation. Both committees voted to pass SB 3326 SD2 with amendments, with the Energy committee adopting the recommendation unanimously and the Labor committee adopting it with one reservation and two no votes. The Energy and Environmental Protection Committee then took up SB 2497 SD2, which would require electric utilities other than cooperatives to provide transparent, publicly accessible customer bill impact analyses and annual reports to the PUC. The Department of Commerce and Consumer Affairs and the PUC offered comments, with the PUC supporting the intent. Life of the Land said the proposed disclosure requirements would be too complex for most ratepayers to use meaningfully, while Hawaiian Electric said the bill could raise costs and slow projects, though it acknowledged some of the language changes and said much of the information is already available through existing planning and regulatory processes. Hawaii Clean Power Alliance and one individual testified in support. No vote was taken on SB 2497 SD2 during the excerpt. The committee also heard SB 3183 SD2, which would bar higher-income taxpayers from claiming the renewable energy technologies income tax credit for certain residential solar systems and would change refundability rules. The Department of Taxation, the Hawaii State Energy Office, and the Tax Foundation offered comments, while the Hawaii Solar Energy Association and numerous companies and individuals opposed the bill. Opponents raised concerns about impacts on financing models and the solar market. Members asked the Department of Taxation for data on how credits are claimed by homeowners versus third-party owners and on the refundability of the credit; the department said it did not have the information immediately available but would follow up. The chair indicated decision-making would likely be deferred to allow further review, and no vote was taken in the excerpt.

Transcript Highlights:

• amending the Wyoming Governmental Claims Act, providing immunity for persons providing competency evaluations
• competency detainees before a competency competency detainees before a competency competency evaluation
• or<00:14:09.360> or<00:14:09.720> restoration,<00:14:10.680> amending evaluation
• or or restoration, amending evaluation or or restoration, amending the<00:14:11.120> Wyoming<
• evaluations or restoration services<00:14:17.800> as<00:14:17.920> specified,<00:14:18.840

Keywords: 916, all

Transcript Highlights:

• give them time to have the had the to give them time to have the psychological<00:46:46.720> evaluation
• <00:46:47.359> and<00:46:47.599> appropriate psychological evaluation and appropriate
• come out of it and be the best person they could be, I would like to see us more so having them evaluated
• ><00:49:27.440> so<00:49:28.160> having<00:49:28.480> them<00:49:28.720> evaluated
• <00:49:29.440> and see us more so having them evaluated and see us more so having them evaluated

Bills: HB348, HB106, HB347, HB54, SB118, SB167, SB195, HB260, HB263, HB328, HB348, HB106, HB347, HB54, SB118, SB167, SB195, HB260, HB263, HB328

Keywords: bail reform, illegal aliens, violent offenses, pretrial detention, flight risk, court hearings, doxing, personal identifying information, harassment, online safety, law enforcement, public servants, penalties, consumer protection, illicit material, private rights, digital privacy, nonconsensual distribution, incarceration, pregnancy

Transcript Highlights:

• Can you come and evaluate?"
• Can you come and evaluate?" evaluate?" evaluate?"
• with an assessment of whether someone needs to go to a hospital emergency department for further evaluation
• department to go to hospital emergency department for<00:49:59.520> further<00:49:59.920> evaluation
• <00:50:00.559> and<00:50:00.720> IA for further evaluation and IA for further evaluation

Keywords: 928, house, all

Summary: The committee first handled routine business, approving the prior meeting minutes with one abstention from a member who had been absent. It then received an update from DHHS Commissioner Lori Weaver on the department’s rural health transformation grant submission. Weaver said the grant was submitted ahead of the deadline, reflected input from communities and providers statewide, and would now enter a CMS review and negotiation phase. She explained that the governor’s office will oversee the grant with DHHS, that some proposals may be limited by federal parameters, and that the department may need to hire some staff to administer the grant, within the grant’s administrative cap. Members also discussed DHHS budget pressures and staffing. The department’s CFO, Nathan White, reviewed the agency’s budget mix, noting that DHHS accounts for a large share of the state’s operating and general fund budgets, and explained projected general fund lapse estimates, which he said are currently just under $20 million for the department. He also described why lapse projections are difficult to predict in DHHS because many costs are driven by utilization and because some funds are statutorily non-lapsing. White reported that vacancy rates have risen, citing about 400 unfunded positions in the current biennium and the department’s hiring freeze, while emphasizing that direct-care positions are being prioritized. Committee members raised concerns that back-of-the-budget cuts and weak revenue collections could affect the department’s ability to manage lapse projections. The committee then heard from Division of Public Health Director Ian Watt on vaccine policy and federal changes. Watt said New Hampshire continues to support access to safe and effective vaccines, including through the universal purchase program and seasonal respiratory virus guidance. He explained a recent CDC change regarding the MMRV vaccine, which now discourages the combined shot for the first dose in children under four because of febrile seizure risk, while still allowing it for the second dose. Watt said New Hampshire’s school and child care vaccine mandates remain stable, with nine vaccines required for schoolchildren and 10 for child care, and that the state continues to review federal recommendations cautiously. He also said there have been no supply or funding disruptions affecting vaccine access, and that childhood vaccine funding through commercial insurers remains intact. Finally, the Permanent Subcommittee on Alzheimer’s Disease and Other Related Dementias presented its annual report. The subcommittee said it met about six times, heard presentations on state services, silver alerts, brain health awareness, and palliative/hospice care, and began work on updating the state’s Alzheimer’s plan, which had last been updated in 2015-2016. To gather more direct input, the subcommittee formed a needs-assessment work group to develop a survey for people living with dementia, caregivers, and service providers. It recommended integrating Alzheimer’s and dementia materials into chronic disease, aging, and public health outreach; embedding cognitive health into systems of care and the state health improvement plan; adding cognitive health measures to BRFSS; and continuing partnerships with aging and advocacy organizations. Members praised the report and suggested it should clearly identify the subcommittee and include page numbers in future versions.

Transcript Highlights:

• We are disappointed that the LAC evaluation subcommittee did not recommend the OA to investigate the
• We are disappointed that the LAC evaluation subcommittee did not recommend the OA to investigate the
• We are disappointed that the LAC evaluation subcommittee did not recommend the OA to investigate the
• The third is the drug evaluation and classification program.
• We need to re-evaluate the status quo of problem solving of lane addition expansion when we know that

Keywords: 1187, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• To address the needs of the community, it is proposed to evaluate the water storage components, water
• The city is also proposing to evaluate the sanitary sewer collection system and treatment facility.
• community, it is proposed to evaluate community, it is proposed to evaluate the<01:01:37.520>
• The city is also proposing<01:01:47.920> to<01:01:48.160> evaluate<01:01:48.640> the
• proposing to evaluate the sanitary sewer collection<01:01:50.400> system<01:01:50.799> and

Bills: HF568, HF433, HF1689, HF3135, HF3137, HF3145, HF2887, HF2819, HF2802, HF2664, HF2267, HF799, HF800, HF3049, HF296, HF580, HF1438, HF1237

Keywords: special education, education funding, construction, Minnesota, regional educational programs, HF433, Cloquet Area Fire District, fire station, capital investment, bonding bill, state bonds, general obligation bonds, public safety, emergency services, fire protection, local infrastructure, Minnesota capital budget, DEED grant, municipal facilities, station construction

Transcript Highlights:

• Therefore, the HPIA board, a year or so ago, had to re-evaluate their purchasing strategy.
• I would say there is no magic bullet, but getting issues on the table and doing a thorough evaluation
• I would say there is no magic bullet, but getting issues on the table and doing a thorough evaluation
• /c><01:02:46.720> thorough the table and doing a thorough the table and doing a thorough evaluation
• of where our markets at and evaluation of where our markets at and where<01:02:49.680> the<01

Keywords: 912, senate, all