Transcript Highlights:

• Speaker, I yield back. minute<00:14:47.079> Mr<00:14:47.360> Speaker<00:14:47.800> I
• <00:14:47.959> rise<00:14:48.320> today<00:14:48.639> to minute Mr Speaker I
• <00:14:54.880> dedication<00:14:55.399> and<00:14:55.680> success<00:14:56.120><
• > boxing<00:14:57.519> has<00:14:57.720> inspired<00:14:58.320> all<00:14
• > you<02:14:04.239> for<02:14:04.480> what<02:14:04.679> purpose<02:14:05.000

Keywords: U.S. House of Representatives Floor Proceedings on Thursday, March 6, 2025, 1012, house, all

Transcript Highlights:

• that they are<00:14:06.639> actually<00:14:07.079> part<00:14:07.279> of<00:14:
• :44.160> put<00:14:44.440> this<00:14:44.639> kind<00:14:44.759> of<00:14
• asked<00:14:51.160> the<00:14:51.360> question<00:14:51.720> is<00:14:51.920
• is because I think<00:14:53.360> what<00:14:53.480> we<00:14:53.600> need<00:14
• :14:58.240> go<00:14:58.600> I<00:14:58.720> I<00:14:58.800> think<00:14:

Keywords: 912, senate, all

Summary: The joint Committee on Higher Education and Agriculture heard Senate Bill 1158, which would authorize general obligation bonds and appropriations for a controlled environment agriculture research and demonstration facility at the Magoon Research and Teaching Site in Manoa. Testimony was overwhelmingly supportive from the University of Hawaiʻi, Department of Agriculture, Farm Bureau, Maui County, MetroGrow Hawaiʻi, and other agricultural groups, who said the project would strengthen food resilience, support year-round production, create clean jobs, and provide a demonstration site for urban vertical farming. University representatives said the project would include demolition of an existing condemned building, a research and lab component, and a multistory vertical farm, with an estimated cost of $6 million and a projected two-year build time. Members questioned whether Manoa was the best location, whether the project fit the university’s broader strategy, and whether the request would displace other priorities. The University said the site is tied to SEAR activities, close to students and faculty, and intended to support hands-on training and commercial-scale production. In response to concerns about soil testing and stakeholder needs, the University said it would restart the soil testing lab using internal funds, though not as part of this bill, and would request additional staff for efficiency. The committee then recessed and later reconvened in decision-making, where the chairs recommended and the committee adopted amendments to SB 1158, including a name correction and deferral to July 31, 2050, and the bill passed with amendments. The committee then took up Senate Bill 663, relating to the University of Hawaiʻi College of Tropical Agriculture and Human Resources and SEAR research and experiment stations. The University testified that the stations are important for locally relevant agricultural research but are short staffed, with 34 positions down since 2005, and that the bill requests eight new positions, including agricultural technicians and four county community coordinator positions, to improve station operations, community engagement, and workforce development. The Farm Bureau supported the measure, saying the positions are needed to revamp extension services and that Manoa is an appropriate urban location for the vertical farming component. Members questioned why vacant or existing positions could not be used instead of new ones, and the University explained that some listed vacancies reflected old federally funded positions or inaccurate counts, promised a written update, and said it was working to fill current openings. No final vote on SB 663 was reached in the portion provided.

Transcript Highlights:

• <00:14:01.040> report<00:14:01.279> by<00:14:01.519> voter<00:14:01.839> 16
• House<00:14:10.720> Bill<00:14:10.959> number<00:14:11.440> 104<00:14:12.720>
• a favorable<00:14:13.680> report<00:14:13.920> by<00:14:14.160> vote<00:14:14.320
• These<00:14:21.120> bills<00:14:21.360> received<00:14:21.680> a<00:14:21.839
• Senate<00:14:34.720> confirmation<00:14:35.279> number<00:14:35.600> 45<00:14:36.320

Keywords: 920, all

Summary: The Alabama Senate convened with prayer, the pledge, and a roll call establishing a quorum. The chamber approved routine motions to excuse absent senators, dispense with the previous day’s journal, and allow introduction of bills and committee reports throughout the day. The Senate also received several House messages referring bills to committee, including local constitutional amendments for Limestone, Blount, and Mobile counties, a human cloning bill, a Fair Campaign Practices Act bill, a public education bill, a court fees bill, and a physician assistance bill. Committee reports were then taken up. The Finance and Taxation General Fund, Confirmations, State Governmental Affairs, County and Municipal Government, Education Policy, Banking and Insurance, Fiscal Responsibility and Economic Development, Transportation and Energy, and Local Legislation committees all reported a number of bills favorably, many with amendments or substitutes. Several measures were advanced to the calendar for the next legislative day, and the Senate confirmed multiple appointments, including Eileen Meyer and Tiffany Martin to the Alabama Board of Midwifery, Jennifer Ag, Jerry Gross, and Edgar Hower II to the University of West Alabama Board of Trustees, Patricia Sims, Tony Cochran, and Sandy Stimson to the Alabama State Port Authority Board of Directors. The Senate then adopted a special order calendar under Senate Resolution 34, setting the order of business for the 10th legislative day. The main floor debate centered on House Bill 161, the App Store Accountability Act, which was described as a child-protection measure requiring parental permission, age verification by app stores, accurate app age ratings, and limits on minors entering contracts through app downloads. Senators speaking in support said the bill was needed to protect children from harmful online content and preserve parental control, and they discussed an amendment clarifying the meaning of “act” and preserving compliance with other state age-verification laws. The debate was ongoing in the portion provided, and no final vote on HB 161 appears in this excerpt.

Transcript Highlights:

• Turning to page 10 of 14, at the top, lines 587 and 589 are no-cost grant extensions.
• Sections 12, 13, and 14.
• Sections 14 and 57 are a new proposal.
• Sections 14 and 15 add the crime of child torture to the permanent disqualifications.
• Sections 11 through 14 are also a new proposal.

Bills: HF2434

Keywords: healthcare, personal care assistance, worker retention, disability services, state funding

Transcript Highlights:

• <00:14:01.120> To<00:14:01.360> his<00:14:01.600> many<00:14:01.839> friends
• > he<00:14:08.880> will<00:14:09.040> be<00:14:09.199> missed<00:14:10.000
• :11.440> I<00:14:11.760> find<00:14:12.000> comfort<00:14:12.320> in<00:14
• So, Mr.<03:14:06.640> Speaker,<03:14:08.000> if<03:14:08.160> it's<03:14:08.399>
• Speaker,<03:14:15.359> let<03:14:15.840> the<03:14:16.239> professionals,<03:14:

Keywords: U.S. House of Representatives Floor Proceedings on Thursday, June 26, 2025, 1012, house, all

Transcript Highlights:

• And the other one pertains to our public records chapter.
• We are scheduled to move in September 14, 2026. So we will spend another session in the modular.
• I can share that there's 424 session law chapters, however. 424. And how many bills introduced?

Summary: The committee began with introductions of members and staff, then approved the minutes from the previous meeting and approved a step increase for Code Advisor Kathy Buckley. Staff reported on publication sales and distribution, noting that 2024 paper and paid sales were down from prior years, while online access and reduced demand for printed copies continued to trend downward. Members discussed the continuing role of printed RCWs and session laws, with staff explaining that libraries and counties remain the main paper purchasers and that some specialized titles are still produced in print and electronic formats. The committee then reviewed a table of “multiple actions” affecting RCW sections from the 2025 session. Staff explained that 153 sections had multiple amendments or related actions, but most could be merged through editorial authority; about 10 sections would likely need future legislative cleanup. The committee approved the table, allowing staff to proceed with merging where possible. Financially, staff reported the office was on track to return about $542,000 to the state, though that amount may decrease slightly because of end-of-year purchases, including a shared printer for LSS. They also noted a slight budget reduction for the next fiscal year, but said staffing adjustments and existing coverage should prevent problems. The committee discussed upcoming rulemaking to align the office’s public records procedures with House and Senate practices, including designating a public records officer and updating language to reflect current legislative structure. Staff said the process would follow standard APA rulemaking and could take roughly six months. Members also heard about a prior “video auditor” incident at the office and the office’s response and training. Finally, staff provided a building update: the office is scheduled to move back into the renovated Pritchard building on September 14, 2026, with furniture selection underway. At the end of the meeting, staff shared session statistics, including 424 session law chapters, 1,305 House bills introduced, 1,082 Senate bills introduced, 238 House bills passed, and 193 Senate bills passed, and the committee adjourned.

Transcript Highlights:

• We have, I think it's 14 statutory probate court judges. Oh, I'm off.
• We also have attorneys appointed under Chapter 264 of the Family Code. ...which are in court-ordered
• parents to select attorneys for termination cases, I would suggest that attorneys appointed under Chapter

Bills: SB629, SB1015, SB2501, SB2933

Keywords: child support, interest accrual, family law, delinquency, financial judgment, statutory probate courts, probate court fees, judicial fund, county reimbursement, comptroller, Texas Government Code, Local Government Code, court fees, fee allocation, excess contributions, judicial education and support fund, presiding judge salary, county finance, court administration, Texas judiciary

Transcript Highlights:

• HCR 5 SCR 14. Mr. doorkeeper, Mr.
• Uh, the Texas chapter of the Recording Academy are gathering in Austin today, celebrating the unique
• have uplifted, we congratulate you on a well-earned retirement and wish you all the best in the next chapter

Transcript Highlights:

• But, you know, both looking at Chapter 70, Chapter 90, we recognize a lot of it's attributable to health
• But, you know, both looking at Chapter 70, Chapter 90, we recognize a lot of it's attributable to health
• Regarding the $242 million increase, I think many of us know Chapter 70 is not equitable for a lot of
• Is there any efforts being made to revisit Chapter 70, especially with the new secretary coming in?
• Chapter 70 and how we think about that.

Keywords: 995, all

Summary: The joint budget hearing opened the FY27 budget process with remarks from the Senate and House Ways and Means chairs, who described the fiscal outlook as challenging because of slow revenue growth, rising health care and other costs, and uncertainty from federal policy changes. Governor Healey and Secretary of Administration and Finance Matthew Gorzkowicz then presented House 2, a $62.8 billion budget that they said grows by about 1% and does not raise taxes or fees. They emphasized affordability, fiscal discipline, protection of core services, and continued investment in education, transportation, housing, child care, health care, and public safety. The administration also discussed a separate bill to delay and phase in certain federal tax-code changes from the so-called OB3 law, especially research and experimental expense provisions, to reduce immediate budget impacts and preserve competitiveness. A major portion of the hearing focused on education and municipal aid. The administration said House 2 provides about $7.6 billion for Chapter 70 aid, fully funds the final year of the Student Opportunity Act, increases special education circuit breaker funding, and raises rural school aid. Senators and representatives from both parties raised concerns that Chapter 70 and other aid formulas are not equitable for small, rural, and low-wealth communities and are not keeping pace with inflation, and several called for broader review of the formula and related funding streams. The governor and secretary said they are open to further discussion, pointed to additional support through rural aid, special education, transportation reimbursements, and minimum aid, and said total Student Opportunity Act investment would reach about $2.1 billion over the life of the law. Transportation, housing, and fair share spending were also central topics. The administration said fair share revenues are being used holistically, with education-heavy spending in the operating budget and transportation-heavy spending in the supplemental budget, and estimated the overall split to date at roughly 57% education and 43% transportation. They highlighted MBTA stabilization, regional transit authority support, microtransit, fare-free regional transit, and bridge and commuter rail investments, while noting the MBTA remains a major fiscal concern. On housing, the governor stressed production, permitting reform, ADUs, down-payment assistance, and support for public housing authorities, while lawmakers pressed for more funding for local housing authorities and for ways to address out-migration, energy costs, and affordability. The governor also said the administration will not withhold fire safety grants from communities over MBTA Communities Act noncompliance and will handle such issues case by case. No votes were taken at the hearing; it was an informational presentation and question-and-answer session.

Transcript Highlights:

• 00:14:28.600> for<00:14:28.800> all<00:14:29.320> for<00:14:29.519> all<00
• <00:14:30.880> to<00:14:31.360> com<00:14:31.720> well<00:14:31.920> let<
• > you're<00:14:33.199> trying<00:14:33.360> to<00:14:33.440> do<00:14:33.600
• :34.720> see<00:14:34.920> done<00:14:35.120> is<00:14:35.279> just<00:14
• > I<00:14:56.160> think<00:14:56.320> we<00:14:56.440> could<00:14:56.600

Keywords: 912, senate, all

Summary: The Judiciary Committee heard several bills on January 30. SB 286 and SB 287 both concerned supplemental funding for the Honolulu Department of the Prosecuting Attorney: SB 286 for the career criminal prosecution unit and SB 287 for the victim witness assistance program. Testimony from the department explained that these bills are filed each year because the Attorney General’s core budget allocation may not be sufficient, though the department said the core had recently been increased and the supplemental request might no longer be necessary. For SB 287, the department also warned of a possible federal Victims of Crime Act funding freeze that could cut about $1.88 million and severely harm victim services. Both bills drew support from county and community witnesses, and members asked about prior-year funding and why the requests were limited to fiscal 2025-26; no votes were taken in the excerpt. SB 289, from the State Ethics Commission, would create a more uniform administrative fine process under the ethics code and lobbyist law. The commission said the measure would not change substantive enforcement but would let it issue a notice and order of fine first, with the respondent able to request a hearing within 20 days, which would speed up cases that are not factually disputed. Members questioned whether the bill would deny due process or function like an automatic parking ticket, and the commission responded that respondents could still challenge the fine and that the process would apply to violations with fines under $1,000. The committee also heard SB 304, which would add 11 positions for the First Circuit Adult Client Services Branch; Judiciary testimony said probation caseloads are high, with an average of 116 cases per officer, and the added staff would help meet national supervision standards and better serve higher-risk clients. Members asked whether the positions were already in the budget and about current staffing ratios; the witness said the positions were not already funded and that the Judiciary supported the bill with amendments. The committee then heard SB 311, a proposed constitutional amendment to exclude spending money to influence elections from protected free speech. Testimony was strongly divided: supporters argued that Citizens United has distorted elections and empowered special interests, while opponents warned the language was too broad and could affect nonprofit advocacy and grassroots groups. Finally, SB 313 would impose a 1% wealth asset tax on individuals with $20 million or more in assets. The Department of Taxation said it had concerns about the bill’s ambiguity and administration and noted it would require annual valuation and likely additional resources; opponents, including family business representatives and the Tax Foundation of Hawaii, argued the tax would be difficult and costly to administer, would require sensitive business disclosures, and could force family businesses to pay from company cash. Supporters said wealthy residents should pay a fair share. The committee heard testimony and questions on these bills, but the excerpt does not show final committee votes or actions.

Transcript Highlights:

• .<00:14:08.480> Senator<00:14:08.800> Lucero,<00:14:09.440> now<00:14:09.760>
• I'd also like to<00:14:16.560> ask<00:14:16.720> for<00:14:16.880> a<00:14:16.959
• > roll<00:14:17.120> call<00:14:17.360> on<00:14:17.519> the<00:14:17.680
• :00.080> to<01:14:00.239> come<01:14:00.400> back<01:14:00.560> and<01:14
• If Senator Pa<01:14:06.880> had<01:14:07.120> actually<01:14:07.360> read<01:14:

Keywords: 1187, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• He served 14 years in the Arizona State Senate, where his policy prowess and political acumen contributed
• It cuts $14 million from affordable housing during the midst of an affordable housing crisis.
• The other item is number 14.
• The other item is number 14.
• House Bill 4141, amending laws 2024, Chapter 211, Section 6.

Summary: The House convened, approved the journal, and spent much of the opening portion recognizing guests and interns from both parties, along with former lawmakers and a newly seated member, Representative Sylvia Allen. The chamber then took up House Concurrent Resolution 2065 honoring the late Alfredo Gutierrez. Members from both parties gave extended remarks about his life as a civil rights advocate, student activist, legislator, and mentor, and the resolution was unanimously adopted and transmitted to the Senate. Family members of Gutierrez were recognized in the gallery during the memorial tribute. The House then moved into Committee of the Whole on the first budget-related measures. On House Bill 4138, the “feed bill”/budget operations measure, Democrats argued the budget favored corporations and data centers over seniors, health care, housing, universities, and vulnerable families, while Republicans defended it as a continuation of prior policy and said it preserved tax conformity and modest agency cuts. After debate and questions, the committee recommended the bill do pass and the House adopted that report, sending HB 4138 to engrossing. The chamber next considered House Bill 4139, the amusement/gaming-related budget bill. Members debated whether it was essentially unchanged from last year’s budget language, with Republicans saying it was a continuation bill and that gaming-related provisions would support rural economies and tourism, while Democrats questioned the broader budget context and its effects on working families. The committee recommended HB 4139 do pass, and the House adopted that recommendation. The House then began debate on House Bill 4140, the state budget implementation bill, focusing on the budget stabilization fund and a proposed government efficiency initiative; discussion was still underway at the end of the transcript.

Transcript Highlights:

• So<00:14:29.839> step<00:14:30.079> two,<00:14:30.800> what<00:14:31.120> is<
• each<00:14:35.600> state<00:14:35.839> is<00:14:36.000> to<00:14:36.240> have
• to<00:14:40.320> belong<00:14:40.720> to<00:14:40.959> the<00:14:41.279>
• Again,<00:14:47.040> in<00:14:47.279> plain<00:14:47.600> terms,<00:14:48.079>
• <00:14:50.800> It<00:14:51.120> steps<00:14:51.440> in<00:14:52.000> when

Keywords: 1189, house, all

Transcript Highlights:

• uh and non-driver<00:14:01.519> IDs<00:14:02.240> about<00:14:02.639> the<00:14
• Um, it's<00:14:09.360> costly<00:14:10.240> to<00:14:10.480> be<00:14:10.639>
• <00:14:12.720> It<00:14:12.959> does<00:14:13.120> have<00:14:13.519> a
• c><00:14:17.839> what's<00:14:18.079> explained<00:14:18.399> to<00:14:18.480>
• :14:05.279> of<04:14:05.520> the<04:14:05.840> of<04:14:06.239> the<04:14

Keywords: 1189, house, all

Transcript Highlights:

• It was hitting around 14. targeted market equity that we granted.
• It was hitting around 14. Which is down a bit.
• It was hitting around 14, maybe close to 15, but it's come down some.
• Healthcare support occupations have the highest projected percentage growth, or just over 14%.
• It also adds two definitions to the chapter, which addresses the defined contribution retirement plan

Summary: The Employee Benefits Committee met to approve prior minutes, hear presentations on state employee health insurance, compensation, leave, and related policy issues, and then recess for lunch. PERS reviewed the history and structure of the state health plan, noting the long-standing state-paid family coverage, cost-control measures, wellness incentives, the current grandfathered PPO and high-deductible options, and the effects of recent benefit mandates such as insulin caps, prosthetic coverage, medication management, prescription copay changes, and ambulance balance-billing limits. Committee members questioned the fiscal impact of adding benefits and the possible cost of moving to a non-grandfathered plan, while PERS and HRMS emphasized that health insurance remains the top-ranked employee benefit and that any major plan changes should be considered carefully. HRMS also presented compensation comparisons showing state pay generally below private-market benchmarks, discussed targeted market equity adjustments, identified ongoing recruitment and retention concerns in fields like nursing, IT, engineering, and attorneys, and reviewed leave policies, tuition reimbursement, and family leave comparisons with neighboring states. Job Service provided labor market data showing low unemployment, high labor force participation, and wage growth that still trails some neighboring markets, and OMB explained that prevailing wage requirements apply to federally funded projects under Davis-Bacon, not to ordinary state contracts. After lunch, the committee took up the required process for health insurance mandate bills and adopted an amendment to Joint Rule 211. The amendment clarified that the deadline for submitting mandate measures is intended to allow time for all required reports, including both the cost-benefit analysis and any Employee Benefits Committee actuarial report, while leaving the existing deadline unchanged. The amendment was adopted on a roll call vote, with several members voting yes and a few no votes recorded. The committee then moved into its jurisdiction review of bill drafts, beginning with a bill that would automatically renew pre-tax dental and vision elections; members debated whether it had any actuarial or administrative impact on PERS or the state, and the chair explained that the committee’s role was only to decide whether further analysis was needed before later testimony and recommendations.

Transcript Highlights:

• almost tripled over the last four years, from 5.2 million for the 2021 regular local election to over 14
• which is the most recent election for which we have reconciled data, the Secretary of State spent $14
• Within this chapter, there are two main points that we'll discuss.
• Days they do a mobile early voting and you know one chapter house and another day in a in a you know,
• Uh, lines or slides 14 and 15.

Transcript Highlights:

• would<00:14:01.720> be<00:14:01.920> suppressed<00:14:02.639> but<00:14:02.759>
• :14:04.040> of<00:14:04.199> the<00:14:04.440> choice<00:14:04.680> of<00
• exception<00:14:06.880> um<00:14:07.639> so<00:14:07.959> you<00:14:08.079>
• <00:14:11.120> death<00:14:11.279> or<00:14:11.440> bodily<00:14:11.920>
• > we<00:14:13.560> don't<00:14:13.800> have<00:14:13.920> a<00:14:14.120>

Keywords: 912, senate, all

Summary: The Judiciary Committee heard testimony on SB 284, which would remove the requirement that wiretapping applications to a designated judge be accompanied by a written memorandum from the Department of the Attorney General. The Department of the Attorney General opposed the bill as drafted and instead proposed a new emergency-wiretap procedure allowing county prosecutors to seek immediate judicial authorization in exigent circumstances, followed by AG review and a follow-up application within 48 hours. The Honolulu Prosecuting Attorney’s office supported creating an emergency exception, citing a kidnapping case involving a missing material witness and the need to obtain live phone location data quickly, but asked that the AG be required to respond clearly within the follow-up period. The AG said the current wiretap process often arrives incomplete and noted a prior Honolulu application that was returned for more information and then abandoned. The committee also heard public testimony, including one speaker in support and another in opposition, and discussed whether the proposed emergency process should include imminent danger findings and what happens if the follow-up application is not approved. No vote or final action was taken in the transcript. The committee then took up SB 295, which increases penalties for violating temporary restraining orders and orders for protection and makes related changes. The Deputy Public Defender opposed the bill’s higher penalties, arguing that not all restraining-order cases involve domestic violence and that the measure could affect family disputes, property conflicts, custody battles, and other non-domestic situations. The Honolulu Prosecuting Attorney supported the bill, saying it would create a more uniform and efficient charging framework and that violations of court orders can be serious even when the conduct appears minor in isolation. Domestic violence advocates also supported the measure, emphasizing the need for meaningful enforcement and deterrence; one witness cited statewide data showing thousands of TRO petitions but relatively few convictions and fines. A representative from the Domestic Violence Action Center supported the bill but requested amendments to reduce unintended consequences for survivors. During discussion, the committee focused on the proposed minimum sentence, with the Domestic Violence Action Center recommending reducing it from 15 days to 5 days. The witness explained that longer minimums can create hardships such as job loss, housing instability, and child care problems, while still allowing time for survivors to access shelter and services. The committee chair indicated support for amending the bill to reflect that recommendation. The Honolulu Prosecuting Attorney also clarified that the bill is intended to address violations of already-issued protective orders after judicial review, not the initial issuance of restraining orders, and said the office supports eliminating the distinction between domestic and non-domestic protective-order violations because charging decisions are often made under time pressure. Multiple individuals and organizations signed up in support, and one witness testified in opposition. No vote or final committee action was announced in the transcript.

Transcript Highlights:

• So<01:14:02.719> these<01:14:03.040> exemptions<01:14:03.760> balance<01:14:04.239
• But at<01:14:09.360> the<01:14:09.520> same<01:14:09.679> time,<01:14:09.840>
• 01:14:40.480> and<01:14:40.800> many<01:14:41.040> people<01:14:41.199> in
• this in<01:14:41.920> the<01:14:42.080> Senate<01:14:42.480> has<01:14:42.719>
• :14:50.720> was<04:14:50.800> in<04:14:50.960> co<04:14:51.439> oops<04:14

Keywords: 1191, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• The question<03:14:13.840> is,<03:14:14.080> will<03:14:14.239> the<03:14:14.399
• Those<03:14:19.439> in<03:14:19.600> favor<03:14:19.920> say<03:14:20.160> I.
• And<03:14:27.600> without<03:14:28.000> objection,<03:14:28.399> the<03:14:28.560
• motion to reconsider<03:14:29.439> is<03:14:29.600> laid<03:14:29.840> on<03:14
• For<03:14:43.040> what<03:14:43.279> purpose<03:14:43.520> does<03:14:43.680

Keywords: U.S. House of Representatives Floor Proceedings on Monday, September 15, 2025, 1012, house, all

Transcript Highlights:

• We always<00:14:01.600> She's<00:14:01.839> like,<00:14:01.920> "What<00:14:02.240
• <00:14:02.880> I'm<00:14:03.040> like,<00:14:03.199> "Always<00:14:04.160> I<
• 14:06.880> you<01:14:07.040> know<01:14:07.199> which<01:14:07.440> is<01
• > and<01:14:09.679> want<01:14:09.920> in<01:14:10.080> the<01:14:10.239>
• > side<01:14:16.400> and<01:14:16.800> in<01:14:17.040> the<01:14:17.360>

Keywords: 1189, house, all