Video & Transcript Research : 'dependency cases'
Page 160 of 500
NM
New Mexico 2025 Regular Session
IC - New Mexico Finance Authority Oversight Jul 9th, 2025
New Mexico Finance Authority Oversight Committee
Transcript Highlights:
- We have a food giveaway every Friday, depending on who needs it.
- So depending on where the patient is at, Right, because we do most of Northeast New Mexico.
- We have people in our practice who arrange for those referrals, depending largely on where they are and
- We work so closely and are so dependent on NMFA and the Water Trust Board.
- I wish they would all apply, because then we could make the case to all of you: here's the number that
WY
Wyoming 2026 Regular Session
House Labor, Health & Social Services Committee, February 23, 2026
Labor, Health & Social Services
Transcript Highlights:
- Uh, Medicaid market share is somewhere between 10 to 15%, depending on the area.
- <00:04:14.159>
So <00:04:14.239>it's depending on the area. - So it's depending on the area.
- We are sort of intending a lot of these, you know, some in some cases grants, but some cases capital
- , forms of disability, but in some cases, forms of disability, but in some cases, hospice<01:08:34.000
Bills:
HB0004
MN
Transcript Highlights:
- Every single one of those cases has a digital evidence component.
- Every single one of those cases has a digital evidence component.
- survivors have answers in their cases survivors have answers in their cases more<00:19:47.080>
<01:35:54.080>which are there um in some cas cases which are there um in some cas cases which - penalty boxes I guess will be the case penalty boxes I guess will be the case too<01:44:58.960><
Summary:
The committee first heard from the Minnesota Department of Administration on the governor’s capital budget requests. Commissioner Tamara Grundal described the state’s deferred maintenance backlog, saying Minnesota owns more than 4,800 buildings across 19 agencies, with an estimated replacement value of $11.2 billion and about $2.2 billion in deferred maintenance. She urged continued bonding support for asset preservation, CAPRA emergency repair funding, Capitol Complex security upgrades recommended by the ACAS advisory committee, and a budget-neutral account to help leverage federal funds for renewable energy storage and electric vehicle projects at state facilities.
Members asked follow-up questions about prior security spending and CAPRA use. The commissioner said some 2018 security funds were used for items such as bollards, projectile-resistant glass, key card readers, and security kiosks, but specific details would be provided offline. On CAPRA, staff said recent projects included public safety upgrades, correctional facility repairs, water main and sewer work, roof repairs, lift station repairs, and boiler and steam trap replacements. The commissioner said the account has recently been used heavily, with about $1.9 million remaining, and estimated a typical target range of roughly $3 million to $5 million based on past spending and expected emergencies. A staffer said they did not know whether bonds had been issued ahead of time to fund the reserve and would follow up.
The committee then heard from the Department of Public Safety on BCA capital projects. Commissioner Bob Jacobson and Superintendent Drew Evans said the governor’s proposal includes a new Southern BCA regional office and laboratory in Mankato, expansion of BCA regional office and lab space, and a new Minnesota State Patrol headquarters using trunk highway cash. Evans said the Mankato project is needed because of growth in DNA analysis, digital evidence, controlled substances, cyber tips, and sexual assault kit testing, and because the current St. Paul facility is over capacity. He said the new regional facility would improve turnaround times, reduce travel for scientists and law enforcement, support training, and improve evidence intake and crime scene response in southern Minnesota.
Senator Pappas questioned the increase in the Mankato project cost from about $48 million to $68.6 million. Evans said the increase was driven by rising construction costs and additional specialized laboratory and support-space needs identified during design work with the Department of Administration. No votes or formal actions were taken during the portion of the meeting provided.
AL
Alabama 2025 Regular Session
Alabama Senate Finance and Taxation Education Committee Apr 30th, 2025
Finance and Taxation Education
Transcript Highlights:
- Uh, so this deals with the GI dependent scholarship. Just a little bit of background.
- or those who are 100% disabled or in extreme situations. who are 100% disabled or in extreme cases,
- Another problem with HB487 is that scholarships are given to the dependents of those who are only to
- the dependents of those who are only minimally disabled.
- There's just no justification for giving scholarships to dependents of minimally scholarships to dependents
Keywords:
rural health, hospital funding, tax credits, qualified donations, Alabama Department of Revenue, HB273, Hunger-Free Campus Act, hunger free campus, food insecurity, college hunger, student hunger, campus pantry, food pantry, SNAP, Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program, basic needs, student food assistance, meal vouchers, meal credits, food vouchers
NH
Transcript Highlights:
- Um we had a case come in with a Health.
- Dodie replied that it depends on the SPF and formulation.
- So um depending on the SPF and the >> Yeah.
- Um and so we or a license in this case.
- They all look a little bit differently depending on their situations.
FL
Florida 2025 Regular Session
Appropriations Committee on Criminal and Civil Justice Mar 18th, 2025
Transcript Highlights:
- AND IN MOST CASES YOU WILL SEE THE WARNINGS ARE ABOUT THREE TIMES THE AMOUNT OF THE CITATIONS, BUT NOT
- THE CASE IN LIVERIES.
- >> Vice Chair: PROPERTY PEOPLE WHO DON'T OWN BOATS LIKE CATTLE. >> DEPENDS UPON IF THEY’RE ADVERTISING
- IT DEPENDS UPON WHAT THEIR OBJECTIVE IS. ARE THEY PEARLY THERE TO MAKE MONEY? AND SOME AREN'T?
NM
New Mexico 2025 Regular Session
IC - Indian Affairs Nov 14th, 2025
House Government, Elections & Indian Affairs
Transcript Highlights:
- That's not only the case in New Mexico, though; that's across the nation.
- And in some cases, a funding agent may say that we don't pay for indirect costs.
- So it depends. I know when I was at Stanford, it was like they got sued by the university.
- So, it just depends, you know, and it's okay.
- I would say that this is the case not just for New Mexico projects.
CA
California 2025-2026 Regular Session
Assembly Environmental Safety Committee and Toxic Materials Committee Jul 15th, 2025
Environmental Safety and Toxic Materials
Transcript Highlights:
- And it's one of the reasons why every shredding facility will have the ability to make their best case
- Not in every case.
- Not in every case, okay, is that your issue then oh I I don't know what they're referring to in terms
- So maybe I'm, is that not the case? I know I'm closing here, but no, no, okay. All right.
- You need to be careful depending on the context.
TX
Texas 89th Regular
Senate Committee on Health and Human Services May 13th, 2025
Health & Human Services
Transcript Highlights:
- Yes, so I think depending on which direction the agency goes would determine the cost, and I think we're
- My experience working with individuals in the community has shown me cases in which clients residing
- You might remember in the 2024 Malouf versus the state case.
- That was a North Texas case. It was highly... ...publicized in news media.
- So it really depends; a lot of times, it's tailored to which group we're talking to.
Bills:
HB35, HB138, HB754, HB1314, HB1612, HB2254, HB2510, HB2789, HB3560, HB3597, HB4224, HB4273, HB4643, HB4783, HB138
Keywords:
peer support, first responders, mental health, confidentiality, emergency services, health impact analysis, cost analysis, coverage mandates, health insurance, legislative analysis, health care data, human trafficking, trafficking prevention, medical assistant training, health care facilities, hospital compliance, clinic compliance, anti-retaliation, whistleblower protection, employee reporting
TX
Transcript Highlights:
- It depends on the stage of when we're seeking that financing. What do you mean?
- So in the case of Nevada's high-speed rail effort, Nevada received three billion dollars in connection
- It depends on the nature; if it's a private company, I would think that it would pay property taxes.
- I'm not sure what happens in the case of highways or roads.
- In some cases it's, you know, a corner of their property, in some cases it's the middle of their property
Bills:
HB341, HB791, HB1564, HB1695, HB1722, HB1729, HB1772, HB2003, HB2954, HB2989, HB3084, HB3134, HB3135, HB3309, HB3611, HB3679, HB3727, HB3832
Keywords:
affordable housing, zoning, development, community support, local regulations, bicycle lanes, traffic collisions, Texas Department of Transportation, study, public safety, bicycles, electric bicycles, scooters, road safety, transportation study, HB 791, Central Catholic High School, San Antonio, specialty license plate, specialty plates
MN
Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session
Transportation committee OKs bill to ramp up restrictions on repeat DWI offenders 3/19/25
Transcript Highlights:
- And just as an FYI, there's close to 5,000 cases per year in Minnesota of driving without a license,
- per year in there's close to 5,000 cases per year in Minnesota<00:05:17.800>
of <00:05:18.120> - on the amount of choice and depending on the amount of what<00:12:44.480>
what <00:12:44.639>< - One of the things that the bill does do, in some cases, is require that folks go through treatment.
- One of the things that the bill does do, in some cases, is require that folks go through treatment.
Summary:
House File 2130, sponsored by Representative Craft, was heard and amended before being re-referred to the Committee on Public Safety Finance and Policy. The bill responds to serious impaired-driving tragedies in St. Louis Park, including the Park Tavern crash, and aims to strengthen Minnesota’s ignition interlock requirements for repeat DWI offenders. Craft described the bill as based on data showing repeat-offender risk, arguing that current law’s look-back and interlock timelines are too limited and that the statute was also reorganized for clarity.
The A1 amendment was adopted without objection. Craft explained that the amendment clarifies when the $680 license reinstatement fee must be paid: not before entering interlock, but before exiting the program, to reduce barriers to participation. He also said the bill would extend interlock requirements more aggressively for repeat offenders, expand the look-back period for prior offenses, and in some cases require treatment. He emphasized that interlock is intended to improve public safety and can support sobriety, while also acknowledging broader root-cause issues such as mental health and addiction.
Testimony in support came from St. Louis Park Mayor Nadia Mohamad, Police Chief Brian Cruy, and Methodist Hospital President Jennifer Meister. They said the bill would help address gaps in current law, better account for prior offenses, and potentially prevent future tragedies. Some members raised concerns about whether the bill was a reaction to tragedy and about addressing underlying causes of impaired driving, while others supported the measure and noted the need for broader transportation and treatment options. After discussion, the committee voted to re-refer HF 2130 to Public Safety Finance and Policy, and the motion prevailed.
CA
California 2025-2026 Regular Session
Assembly Budget Subcommittee No. 7 on Accountability and Oversight Mar 11th, 2025
Transcript Highlights:
- And part of the reason that that is the case is there's been a long standing federal commitment and state
- So I have some concerns about so heavily depending on the pit count for overarching a measure of success
- In my particular case, we know that this money is not promised, and we have to show better return every
- It is dependent on that relationship building and that outreach work being resourced well enough to be
- Now that is certainly not everyone's experience or story, but where that has been the case, people are
FL
Florida 2026 Regular Session
Joint Legislative Auditing Committee Feb 10th, 2025
Transcript Highlights:
- It just depends on the entity and how well they prioritize it and allocate resources to correction.
- cleaning them up and most of the findings are corrected other times it doesn't go as well it just depends
- In this case, I don't believe... Report to the state attorney or FDLE.
- In this case, I don't believe we did.
- That is absolutely the case.
Summary:
The Joint Legislative Auditing Committee heard the Auditor General’s operational audit of the City of Mexico Beach, which identified nine findings. The audit cited significant turnover in key management positions, late filing of required annual financial reports, weaknesses in competitive procurement and purchase approval controls, a duplicate payment on stormwater repairs that was later largely refunded, issues with the city accountant’s contract and IRS classification, IT access control problems, and the lack of fraud-reporting policies. Committee members asked about corrective action, and the Auditor General said a follow-up audit is required by statute within 18 months, with no enforcement authority beyond reporting progress back to the committee.
Mayor Rich Wolf and city staff responded that the city had experienced major turnover and was rebuilding its finance and administrative team. He said the city had hired a city administrator, financial director, city clerk, and accounting firm, and was working to create policies, procedures, forms, and review processes to address the findings. Members discussed whether the turnover and hurricane-related workload contributed to the problems, and city officials said some of the larger purchases were storm-related and tied to FEMA or emergency work.
The committee then received a staff update on enforcement for local governments that have not filed required financial reports. Staff said 400 entities had been notified, and as of the meeting two counties, 33 municipalities, and 48 special districts still owed reports or audits. The committee adopted a motion to proceed under section 11.42, Florida Statutes, including possible withholding of state funds for municipalities and enforcement actions for special districts, with authority for the chair and vice chair to delay action if new information warranted it.
Finally, the committee unanimously directed the Auditor General and OPPAGA to conduct the required 2024-2025 audit of the Department of the Lottery, with the Auditor General handling financial, internal control, and compliance issues and OPPAGA developing operational recommendations. Members also briefly discussed whether the committee had reviewed transportation surtaxes and expressed interest in improving the timeliness and transparency of the audit and enforcement process before adjourning.
NY
New York 2025-2026 Regular Session
Senate Standing Committee on Housing, Construction and Community Development - 02/25/2026
Housing, Construction, and Community Development
Transcript Highlights:
- an act to amend the Real Property Actions and Proceedings Law in relation to prohibiting naming dependent
- an act to amend the Real Property Actions and Proceedings Law in relation to prohibiting naming dependent
- In any case, this bill... This is Senator Clear, right? This is Senator Clear. Thank you.
- With respect to the other appliances, there is a different charge that is determined depending on whether
- But in any case, in that circumstance, under current law, for a gas-powered dryer they could charge three
Summary:
The Senate Housing, Construction, and Community Development Committee met on February 25 and took up a series of housing-related bills, many of which had previously passed the Senate or been reported by the committee in prior sessions. Measures advanced included bills on NYCHA utility accountability, a small rental housing development initiative, uniform waiting list priorities for domestic violence survivors, protections for dependent children named in eviction papers, expansion of veterans’ housing preferences, inclusion of illegal conversions in the definition of harassment, repeal of obsolete rent formula language, inspection of major capital improvement rent increases and rent stabilization extensions, a community land trust acquisition fund, and an affordable independent senior housing assistance program. Most were reported to finance, Codes, or the floor, typically with some minority negative or “without recommendation” votes noted.
The committee then returned to Senate Bill 6718B, sponsored by Senator Jackson, which would eliminate certain surcharges landlords may charge when tenants install appliances in rent-regulated housing. A guest speaker, Mr. Umberto Lopez, argued the bill would further squeeze landlords, especially small property owners, and warned that rising costs and regulation could lead to more units being taken off the market or “warehoused.” Committee members asked about the bill’s practical effect, including whether tenants could install appliances only with landlord approval and how current surcharge amounts are calculated for air conditioners, washers, dryers, and dishwashers. The chair explained that the bill would remove the ability to charge those existing fees, which are intended to cover wear and tear and utility-related costs.
After the discussion, the committee voted to report S6718B, with minority negative votes recorded. The chair also noted an upcoming housing budget hearing later that day and repeatedly emphasized time limits during the meeting.
NM
Transcript Highlights:
- In case there's any question about the definition of the geographic area, and that's what the amendment
- So, it's all going to depend on how the rules are written for the grant, how it's administered, and how
- The case would have been made that they could have closed their doors altogether without the support.
- Why are we depending upon a federal agency to do that? Mr.
- Depending on where you are in the state of New Mexico, your payer mix changes.
TX
Transcript Highlights:
- Results of both domestic and foreign fresh produce industries depend on having sufficient CBP ag specialists
- Three years ago, you know, we had citations. ranging anywhere from $10,000 to $15,000, $20,000, depending
- You know myself, we have a case.
- denied your permit to build, or they put pressure on that. that developer or on that farmer, rancher, depending
- ones being sued for a rock going through a windshield or our trucks being rear-ended or whatever the case
MO
Missouri 2026 Regular Session
Substance Abuse Prevention and Treatment Task Force Jun 24th, 2026 at 01:00 pm
Substance Abuse Prevention and Treatment Task Force
Transcript Highlights:
- That's not always the case. because the coalition in Missouri came from outside sources.
- I think it depends on what facet that you want to explain.
- That means that you don't lose your medications, as is the case for my patient earlier.
- That means that you don't lose your medications, as is the case for my patient earlier.
- no other reason why that would be the case.
CA
California 2025-2026 Regular Session
Assembly Select Committee on Electric Vehicles and Charging Infrastructure Nov 20th, 2025
Transcript Highlights:
- There is a case for it, particularly at airports.
- Level one is a genius idea for airports, but they're a unique case. Yeah.
- So you're not going to see double duty in a lot of cases here.
- So this really expands the use cases that we have going forward. It allows for...
- That's been the case for us.
Summary:
The joint informational hearing of the Select Committee on Electric Vehicles and Charging Infrastructure focused on California’s EV market, charging infrastructure, and the effects of recent federal actions. The chair opened by emphasizing California’s progress on EV adoption and charging reliability, but also noted ongoing challenges with affordability, access, interoperability, heavy-duty electrification, and federal headwinds. She highlighted interest in technologies such as inductive charging and thanked host organizations and staff before moving to the first panel.
State agency witnesses from Go-Biz, CARB, and the California Energy Commission described current programs and priorities. Go-Biz outlined its role in coordinating agencies, supporting permitting, and advancing the state’s ZEV market development strategy and equity action plan. CARB discussed federal attacks on its clean vehicle regulations, litigation to defend waiver authority, and the importance of incentives and regulatory programs such as Advanced Clean Trucks, Advanced Clean Fleets, Clean Truck Check, HVIP, and Clean Cars for All. The CEC detailed its funding and regulatory work on charging and fueling infrastructure, charger reliability, payment methods, roaming, and statewide planning, while stressing the need for more charging in multifamily housing and more public DC fast charging. All three agencies said federal rollbacks and permitting delays are major obstacles, but that California remains committed to expanding ZEV adoption.
The second panel featured advocates, local government, utility, and research perspectives. CalETC urged continuous state funding through the Greenhouse Gas Reduction Fund and emphasized the low-carbon fuel standard, multifamily charging, and managed charging. An EV advocacy group proposed a conquest-style state incentive for new and used EV buyers and argued that multifamily housing is a major untapped market, while also favoring Level 2 charging over Level 1 for most home and apartment settings. Los Angeles County and LADWP described large-scale local deployment of chargers, fleet electrification, workforce training, and the need for sustained funding, agency coordination, and streamlined permitting and grid interconnection. UCS recommended prioritizing replacement of older high-emitting vehicles, using fuel policy revenues to support cleaner cars, and expanding bidirectional charging. The chair closed by asking for more discussion on Level 1 versus Level 2 charging and noted the importance of education, affordability, and practical deployment strategies.
NH
New Hampshire 2025 Regular Session
House Education Funding (09/23/2025)
Transcript Highlights:
- they have the right to have their case they have the right to have their case adjudicated<00:18:
- <01:45:35.360>
students parents or in some cases students parents or in some cases students - Hey, in case you in case you dance?
- Hey, in case you in case you might<03:16:26.160>
have <03:16:26.319>left <03:16:26.560>< - Uh right now, you're in that case.
Summary:
The Education Funding Committee’s higher education subcommittee met to discuss HB 443, HB 510, and related issues. The chair explained the subcommittee membership and noted that Representative Luno was absent and replaced by Representative Bricky, with other full committee members allowed to participate in discussion but not final votes. No votes were taken during this meeting, and the chair said final subcommittee recommendations would likely come in the first week of November.
On HB 443, which concerns terms of appointment to the Higher Education Commission, the chair described the bill as intended to let the governor replace members who are not attending or no longer representing the appointing organization. He said the prior governor supported the idea, but the current governor’s office believes the bill is unnecessary because nonattendance or loss of representation would already amount to resignation or removal. Members raised questions about legal authority and whether the same principle should apply to other boards. The chair said he was leaning toward finding the bill not needed, but would continue discussion later.
The committee then spent most of the meeting on HB 510, which would establish due process rights for students, student organizations, and faculty at public higher education institutions and address collective bargaining issues. Supporters, including Representatives Papovich and Brown, argued the bill would provide clear, minimum protections, especially because campus rules are lengthy and vary by institution; Brown also suggested adding an independent ombudsman or representation for students. Opponents, including Representatives Burton and Bricky, said existing campus regulations already provide due process and that the bill could interfere with campus governance and collective bargaining. The chair and others discussed whether the bill’s definitions should be aligned with existing law to avoid confusion, and several members suggested using existing statutory definitions or cross-references. The chair also said the bill would apply only when disciplinary action is involved, not as a general challenge to DEI policies, though members referenced recent national examples involving DEI-related disputes as context.
NH
New Hampshire 2025 Regular Session
House Executive Departments and Administration (04/16/2025)
Transcript Highlights:
- does have to physically review the case does have to physically review the case and<00:26:30.880
- know the status of all those cases yet. know the status of all those cases yet.
- we're not ready to review this case. we're not ready to review this case.
- this case? this case?
- depend on how many services they can do. depend on how many services they can do.
Summary:
The committee opened a hearing on Senate Bill 185, which would add timelines to Office of Professional Licensure and Certification (OPLC) investigations. Senator Howard Pearl said the bill was prompted by concerns from the New Hampshire Association of Realtors about delays at the Real Estate Commission, and he explained that the proposal would require OPLC staff to make an initial determination within 30 days and, if misconduct is found, complete an investigation within 60 days. He said the goal is to improve transparency and give consumers and licensees more timely information, while preserving the board’s adjudicatory role. He also noted that the bill had been amended to delay implementation to give OPLC time to work through its backlog.
Committee members questioned how the bill would work when an investigation is incomplete and whether the board could send a case back to OPLC without a firm deadline. Pearl said the board would have discretion to continue the investigation or make a final determination, and that the bill was intended to streamline OPLC’s process rather than impose a hard cap on complex cases. OPLC Executive Director Deanna Durus and General Counsel Nicholas Fry then testified that the agency has already changed its procedures under prior legislation, including a facial review of complaints and monthly board review of dismissal memos. They said the bill would substantially alter the current structure, could conflict with existing limitation periods and board duties, and would be difficult to implement without additional staff and funding.
Durus said the agency’s backlog is large, that new complaints are being triaged and prioritized, and that some urgent matters are moved ahead based on risk and statutory deadlines. She said OPLC had completed a review of about 500 backlog cases that would now be dismissed under current screening standards, and that those cases are being turned into memos for board review. Board of Medicine public member Nina Gardner testified in favor of the bill but said the backlog is significant and that the agency needs more resources to make the process work effectively. She said the board is seeing progress, but not fast enough, and suggested the bill may not go far enough without additional staffing and funding. No vote was taken during the hearing.