Video & Transcript Research : 'learner permit'

Page 15 of 388
CA

California 2025-2026 Regular Session

Assembly Education Committee Feb 12th, 2025

Education

Transcript Highlights:
  • order to facilitate the hearing as much from the public within the limits of our time, we will not permit
  • Public comment may be provided only at the designated time and place, and as permitted by the chair,
  • And then we've had to find new materials for our students, especially our multilingual learners.
  • The other piece is our long-term English learners.
  • A, we call them LTELs, Long-Term English Language Learner.
Keywords: 988, house, all
NM
Transcript Highlights:
  • As a state, we've really struggled in adequately serving our English learners, partly because the SEG
  • never had a dedicated funding stream for English learners. and it didn't provide additional funding
  • So, in response, House Bill 63 created a factor for English learners and students who have exited EL
  • For English learners, they were being funded as if 19.6% of their students were English learners, but
  • in actuality, 66% of their students were English learners.
CA
Transcript Highlights:
  • These TK students would not be eligible because they would not meet the English learner designation.
  • My understanding is that preschool already has a screening tool developed for multilingual learners.
  • and English learner students in kindergarten through grade 12.
  • CSPP contractors receive additional funding for identified dual-language learners in that setting.
  • They've had permitting delays and approval delays.
Summary: The committee heard a series of budget proposals focused on education finance, with repeated questions about whether the state’s investments are coordinated, targeted to the highest-need students, and likely to produce measurable results. On the first item, the administration proposed $1 million for a study of California’s curriculum framework, standards, and instructional materials process, plus $250,000 for supplemental ELA/ELD guidance. CDE and Finance said the study would examine how other states organize standards, frameworks, and adoptions, while the chair and members questioned why California has gone so long without updating some standards, what the study would actually accomplish, and whether the proposal was too vague to justify the cost. The issue was held open. The committee then took up a proposed $25 million statewide literacy network within the system of support. CCEE and CDE said the network would coordinate multiple existing literacy leads, create a clearinghouse of evidence-based resources, and improve coherence across the state’s many literacy initiatives. Members pressed on how a one-time, five-year allocation could support a long-term system, how the work would reach distressed and rural districts, and whether the proposal would translate into classroom change rather than just another layer of coordination. The issue was also held open. Next, the committee reviewed a $500 million proposal to expand literacy coaches and reading specialists and to create a math coaches program. CDE described the existing literacy coach cohorts as producing positive reports from participating LEAs, while the LAO recommended modifications, especially for the math coach portion, including limiting eligibility to elementary schools, setting minimum grant amounts, directing funds to eligible school sites, and making eligibility automatic rather than application-based. Members focused on whether coaches were actually being placed at the schools with the greatest need and whether the state has a coherent long-term strategy for literacy and math investments. The committee also heard a $40 million proposal for training and implementation of K-2 reading difficulty screeners, which the LAO said was reasonable but could be reduced because $25 million had already been provided for training; CDE said the new funds were needed for full implementation, procurement, and sustainability. Finally, the committee heard a $10 million proposal for a developmentally appropriate TK multilingual learner screener, with CDE explaining why the preschool language-identification process is different from K-12 EL assessment and the chair asking staff to explore whether a single, more consistent approach could be developed. The meeting concluded with a presentation on universal school meals and kitchen infrastructure, including a $31.5 million backfill, an $84.1 million increase for projected meal growth, a COLA adjustment, and $150 million for kitchen upgrades and training to support freshly prepared meals.
VT

Vermont 2025-2026 Regular Session

Senate Session - 2026-04-15 - 1:00PM

Vermont Senate Floor Meeting

Transcript Highlights:
  • <00:15:17.360> permits.
  • permits.
  • And it also expands it learners permits.
  • <00:15:36.320> And license and uh learner's permit. And license and uh learner's permit.
  • Such vehicles shall be permitted to park at a parking meter without fee.
Keywords: 927, senate, all
CA
Transcript Highlights:
  • We won't permit talking or loud noises from the audience.
  • And one last thing I wanted to say is the supports for dual-language learners and English learners.
  • And one last thing I wanted to say is the supports for dual-language learners and English learners.
  • We know that 60% For dual-language learners and English learners, we know that 60% of kids in California
  • ages 0 to 5 are English learners, or what we call dual-language learners.
Summary: The Assembly Select Committee on Child Care Costs held its third hearing, focused on how transitional kindergarten (TK) fits into California’s mixed-delivery early learning system, with an emphasis on the Central Valley. Opening remarks stressed that TK and child care should complement each other, not compete, and that families need both part-day school-based options and full-day, year-round care. Committee members outlined hearing goals around aligning TK with existing programs, understanding family needs, and examining the economic impact of early learning on workforce participation and local economies. Panelists from the Legislative Analyst’s Office, Every Child California, Early Edge, Children Now, and others described TK’s rapid expansion to all four-year-olds, the growth in enrollment, and related changes to state preschool and after-school programs. Witnesses generally supported TK but warned that its expansion has shifted enrollment away from community-based providers, especially centers and family child care homes, creating financial strain, vacant classrooms, and staffing challenges. They urged stronger partnerships between school districts and community providers, more flexible licensing and facilities support, higher and more uniform reimbursement rates, permanent authority for state preschool to serve two-year-olds, and better compensation and training for educators across settings. Parents and providers testified about the importance of trusted, culturally and linguistically responsive care, the need for infant-toddler and home-based options, and the difficulty of affording child care when TK is not full-day or does not fit family schedules. Several speakers emphasized that many families still face long waits for subsidies and that reimbursement and payment delays threaten provider stability. Public comment echoed these concerns, with providers calling for true cost-of-care rates, more vouchers, support for transportation and nontraditional hours, and protection from insurance and facility costs that can force programs to close. State education officials said California’s UPK system works best when TK, state preschool, Head Start, and community-based providers are treated as a shared system, and noted that planning and implementation grants and local coordination efforts have helped build mixed-delivery partnerships. The hearing ended without formal votes or actions, but committee members indicated they would continue gathering input to inform future policy and budget decisions.
MN

Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session

No firearms on campus 3/24/26

Minnesota House Floor Meeting

Transcript Highlights:
  • This restriction falls on law-abiding permit holders.
  • Minnesota permit-to-carry holders have already been vetted by the state and trusted to carry for lawful
  • So if someone serves as a permit to carry and they go to an event and they can't get into the venue,
  • So if someone serves as a permit to carry and they go to an event and they can't get into the venue,
  • So if someone serves as a permit to carry and they go to an event and they can't get into the venue,
Keywords: 919, house, all
Summary: The committee took up House File 4362, which would allow Minnesota public colleges and universities to prohibit visitors from carrying firearms on campus, similar to existing policies that already apply to students and employees. The bill’s author argued it was a modest step to help campuses protect staff and students from gun violence, citing the long history of school shootings and saying the decision should be left to each institution. Supporters, including representatives of the Inter Faculty Organization and Minnesota State College Faculty, said the current law leaves a loophole because campuses can restrict students and employees but not visitors, and they pointed to data and incidents suggesting many campus shootings involve non-affiliated individuals. Opponents, including the NRA Minnesota state director and the Minnesota Gun Owners Caucus, argued the bill would create ineffective gun-free zones, disarm lawful permit holders, and expand firearm restrictions across large and sometimes unclear areas of public property. They also raised concerns about notice, due process, and the claim that criminals would ignore the restrictions. In member discussion, supporters emphasized campus safety, institutional discretion, and the responsibility to protect students, while opponents stressed Second Amendment rights and existing campus carry trends in other states. After discussion, the chair announced a roll call vote on the motion to refer House File 4362 to the Public Safety Committee. The motion failed on a 7-7 tie, and the bill was not referred onward.
MN

Minnesota 2025 1st Special Session

House Education Finance Committee 2/18/25

Education Finance

Transcript Highlights:
  • provide a child with the foundational literacy skills, we empower that child to become lifelong learners
  • provide a child with the foundational literacy skills, we empower that child to become lifelong learners
  • provide a child with the foundational literacy skills, we empower that child to become lifelong learners
  • We oppose House File 6, which permits districts to use dedicated revenue approved by this legislature
  • We oppose House File 6, which permits districts to use dedicated revenue approved by this legislature
Bills: HF6, HF52, HF53
OK
Transcript Highlights:
  • Basically, what we're doing here is we are allowing permitted water users to have a five-year averaging
  • It's based on their permitted amount.
  • So, if I was irrigating today and I had a water permit and I'm drawn out just my x number per years'
  • We're requiring a permit fee from the fire marshal's office, and 75% of that permit fee, capped at $500,000
  • We're not saying they have to prove the permit. They just had 30 days to respond.
AL

Alabama 2026 1st Special Session

Alabama House Public Safety and Homeland Security Committee Jan 28th, 2026

Public Safety and Homeland Security

Transcript Highlights:
  • This would exempt them from having to apply for a permit with ADEM.
  • Um, you know, they're not getting permits now and haven't as far as I know.
  • But we uh— to obtain an event permit or any similar to obtain an event permit or any similar event<00
  • Uh and Aaliyah was permitting process.
  • I'm I'm looking to the back of permit.
FL

Florida 2025 Regular Session

October 15, 2025 - 01:30 PM

Transcript Highlights:
  • education system, one of the most comprehensive and responsive systems in the nation, equipping learners
  • districts to more fully Alon funding with instructional hours and programs deliver supporting both permit
  • That enrollment increased from 150,109 learners in 23. 24 to just over 151,359 students in. 24. 25, these
  • investment in those rapid job aligned programs and that investment is paying off supporting more learners
  • The pipeline fund shorter prepping institutions, programs, employers and learners through incentives
CA

California 2025-2026 Regular Session

Assembly Education Committee Jul 1st, 2026

Education

Transcript Highlights:
  • the goal of the hearing and hear as much from the public within the limits of our time, we will not permit
  • Public comment may be provided only at the designated time and place as permitted by the chair.
  • This section defines policy on appropriate use in two main areas: permitted instructional uses and strict
  • I know that the bill language does address the issue of English learners, and I'm just curious: in terms
  • First, to make sure all shade structures are permitted, it expands eligible types from free-standing
Keywords: 988, house, all
CA
Transcript Highlights:
  • , we're going to introduce our first panel, household impacts, and cost pressures on workers and learners
  • This was our Workers and Learners Project.
  • Our students aren't just learners, though; they're workers who keep Los Angeles running, often at the
  • We also recommend empowering workers and learners through workers' rights training and resources.
  • More recommendations we have include strengthening financial support for workers and learners by making
Summary: The Assembly Committee on Economic Development, Growth, and Household Impact held an informational hearing in Paramount as part of its “Pocketbook Tour,” focused on affordability, cost pressures, and household impacts in Los Angeles County. The first panel centered on workers and learners, with testimony from the UCLA Labor Center and the Southeast Los Angeles County Workforce Development Board. Speakers described how rising living costs, tuition, and low wages force many students to work long hours, often in unrelated, low-wage jobs, while struggling with food, rent, bills, anxiety, and limited financial aid. Recommendations included expanding state-funded work study, creating a statewide internship tax credit for small businesses, improving financial aid formulas to reflect regional cost of living, increasing flexibility for students, and strengthening worker-rights education and career pathways. The second panel focused on microbusinesses and small business affordability. Testimony from microenterprise advocates, the Los Angeles Regional Small Business Development Center Network, and local business owners described rising commercial rents, labor costs, tariffs, supply chain disruptions, insurance, utilities, and disaster-related pressures as major threats to small businesses. Witnesses emphasized that small businesses are central to local economies and asked the state to expand technical assistance, low-interest financing, disaster support, supply-chain development, and community-based outreach. They also urged more intentional support for microbusinesses and home-based entrepreneurs, including networks that connect them to resources and help them build collective buying power. Committee members asked about possible state actions, including tax credits for hiring local workers or interns, support for trades and apprenticeships, and ways to partner more closely with SBDCs and chambers of commerce. Public comment echoed the hearing themes, with speakers highlighting student hardship, nonprofit mental health funding, renewable energy jobs and internships, and the need for state support for clean-energy incentives. No formal votes were taken; the hearing concluded with closing remarks and adjournment at 11:05 a.m.