Transcript Highlights:

• , the MOP program, has been discussed as the primary program within UC, and had over 500 loans that particular
• The existing DREAM program? The existing program that the UCs offer?
• Those folks have often gone through treatment programs. They've done it with others.
• They're finishing up their 90-day program and treatment, or perhaps six months, and then they're actually
• and better quality of services at those programs.

Summary: The committee first heard AB 1157, the Affordable Rent Act, which would lower California’s annual rent cap, remove the single-family home exemption, and eliminate the sunset on existing tenant protections. The author and supporters argued that renters are facing severe affordability pressures, especially in single-family rentals, and that stronger statewide rent stabilization is needed to prevent displacement and homelessness. Opponents, including apartment, building, and property-owner groups, said the bill would discourage housing production, harm small landlords, and override a deal they said was intended to be temporary while the state focused on building more housing. Public testimony on AB 1157 was extensive, with many renters, tenant advocates, labor groups, and community organizations speaking in support, while many landlords, business groups, and property-owner representatives spoke in opposition. Committee members were split: some praised the bill as a necessary response to the rent crisis, while others warned it could reduce investment and worsen the housing shortage. The committee ultimately voted 7-5 to pass AB 1157 to the Assembly Judiciary Committee. The committee then approved the consent calendar, including AB 413, AB 1152, and AB 1275, on a 9-0 vote. It also heard ACA 3, which would require the University of California to make available a limited number of down payment loans for eligible long-term support staff who are first-time homebuyers. Supporters said the measure would help lower-wage UC workers afford homeownership and improve retention, while UC and other opponents argued the proposal was duplicative of existing state programs, unnecessary, and potentially harmful to UC finances. The discussion focused on financing mechanics and the relationship to CalHFA, but no final vote on ACA 3 was included in the portion provided.

Transcript Highlights:

• Alternative jet fuel is an opt-in fuel in the Clean Fuels Program, eligible to earn credits in the program
• So that's outside the parameters of the program.
• So that's outside the parameters of the program.
• You spoke a lot to the carbon intensity and the treatment under the Clean Fuels Program.
• threaten the integrity of the program.

Bills: SB6172, SB6246, SB5932

Keywords: Washington climate policy, greenhouse gas, GHG emissions, cap-and-invest, carbon market, emissions trading, allowances, covered entity, coal-fired power plant, coal plant, electric utility, electric generating facility, fossil fuels, natural gas, imported electricity, emissions leakage, air pollution, renewable energy transition, industrial emissions, railroad emissions

Transcript Highlights:

• Is that prison or do certain programming. So, prison or do certain programming.
• </c> mentioned that we already have programs mentioned that we already have programs in<00:53:26.960>
• It prohibits access programs.
• Uh we view this as a programs.
• Thank you, Chair. access program. The notion here to access program.

Keywords: 1187, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• Senators, if you remember, uh, was the phone call conversation and the people that are in care and treatment
• and so with that I'm care and treatment and so with that I'm very<00:02:21.720><c> honored</c><00:02
• </c> uh for direct care and treatment uh for direct care and treatment facilities<00:03:00.080><c> there
• so I think this absolutely the treatment so I think this absolutely the right<00:05:12.680><c> thing
• /c> mile of any existing residential program mile of any existing residential program program<00:45:57.839

Keywords: 1187, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• By providing for faster treatment decisions and authorization of proper, necessary medical treatment,
• As background, the 340B drug pricing program is a federal program requiring drug manufacturers to provide
• Obviously, the 340B program is a federal program, one that's been tremendously successful.
• J&J strongly supports the 340B program.
• She said California took action on the 340B program and its Medicaid program for two main reasons.

Summary: The Ways and Means Committee held a public hearing on multiple bills, beginning with a motion to suspend the five-day notice rule for a long list of Senate bills, which passed on a voice vote. The committee first heard Substitute Senate Bill 6026, a governor-request housing bill that would require cities and counties over 30,000 population to allow residential uses in commercial and mixed-use zones, limit mixed-use/ground-floor commercial requirements in some areas, and allow added height where such requirements are imposed. The lieutenant governor testified strongly in support, arguing the bill would add needed housing capacity without requiring ground-floor retail burdens. The hearing on SB 6026 was then suspended so the committee could move through the agenda. The committee then heard Senate Bill 6294, a broad local government finance measure with eight parts, including expanded uses for certain REET revenues, a new county public utility tax, a new local sales tax for children and family services, expanded housing-related tax uses, changes to county levy structure, longer lid lift periods, and expanded use of rental car tax revenue. Local government, housing, and public health witnesses largely supported the bill, emphasizing flexibility for affordable housing, rental assistance, children’s services, and county fiscal stability. Opponents, including wireless industry, water/sewer district, auto dealer, realtors, energy, and cannabis representatives, objected to specific tax provisions as regressive, costly, or likely to raise consumer prices. Several witnesses requested amendments, including adding public health clinic funding and flood recovery language from House bills. The committee also heard Substitute Senate Bill 5400 on local news sustainability, which would create a state grant program funded by a surcharge on large search engines and social media platforms to support journalism jobs and the Murrow Fellowship program. News organizations, the League of Women Voters, open government advocates, and local journalism supporters testified in favor, saying local news is essential to civic life and that the bill would help sustain reporting without using general fund dollars. Technology industry representatives opposed the bill, arguing it unfairly singles out tech companies and could face legal challenges. The committee then heard Senate Bill 6211, which would let opt-in GMA jurisdictions impose REET-2 without voter approval; cities and counties supported it as a parity and infrastructure funding measure, while Realtors opposed the loss of voter approval. Senate Bill 5650, authorizing local cannabis excise taxes, drew support from some local officials but strong opposition from cannabis businesses, which argued Washington’s cannabis taxes are already too high and drive sales to the illicit market. Senate Bill 6033, waiving penalties and interest for taxpayers who failed to collect new sales tax on certain services, was supported by NFIB as a compliance and fairness measure. Senate Bill 6297, exempting temporary staffing services for nonprofit behavioral health providers from sales tax, drew strong support from behavioral health organizations citing workforce shortages and unsustainable costs. Finally, Senate Bill 6343, extending and expanding tax relief for disaster-damaged property and repairs, was presented as aid for flood recovery; local officials testified in support. No final committee votes on the bills were taken in the portion of the meeting provided.

Transcript Highlights:

• Alternative jet fuel is an opt-in fuel in the Clean Fuels Program, eligible to earn credits in the program
• So that's outside the parameters of the program.
• So that's outside the parameters of the program.
• You spoke a lot to the carbon intensity and the treatment under the Clean Fuels Program.
• threaten the integrity of the program.

Summary: The Senate Environment, Energy & Technology Committee heard three bills. SB 6246 would direct Ecology to develop recommendations for how no-cost allowances for emissions-intensive trade-exposed facilities (EITEs) should work from 2035 to 2050, and would require EITEs to submit facility-specific emissions data and periodic decarbonization plans as a condition of receiving allowances. Supporters said the bill preserves the Climate Commitment Act’s goals while giving the Legislature and Ecology better information to prevent emissions and job leakage and to plan for industrial decarbonization. Opponents argued the bill adds costly reporting and planning burdens, could threaten competitiveness, and in some cases could lead to allowance withholding; Ecology said it generally supports the approach but wants some streamlining and noted implementation costs are not in the governor’s budget. SB 5932 would provide certainty for sustainable aviation fuel development by changing how Ecology applies electricity carbon intensity in the Clean Fuels Program and by setting an earlier trigger for aviation fuel tax incentives. The sponsor and 12, a Moses Lake SAF developer, said the bill would give investors and producers needed certainty for expansion and help Washington remain competitive. Ecology and Climate Solutions opposed parts of the bill, saying it would weaken incentives for new renewable electricity generation, limit Ecology’s technical discretion, and reduce the Clean Fuels Program’s effectiveness, though Ecology said it supports decarbonizing aviation and is willing to work on the issue through rulemaking. Some testimony also supported the tax certainty portion while objecting to the Clean Fuels Program changes, and one witness asked for clarification on local participation in the incentive. SB 6172 would end remaining state tax and regulatory exemptions for the coal-fired TransAlta plant after its scheduled closure date. The sponsor said Washington should remove special treatment now that the state has phased out coal, while supporters said the bill reinforces the state’s clean energy transition and protects public health and climate goals. A few witnesses raised concerns about possible costs to utilities and ratepayers if the plant were ever required to run in an emergency, and asked for language to protect against that. The hearing concluded with the committee closing public testimony on all three bills; no votes were taken in the transcript.

Transcript Highlights:

• Sorry with residential treatment programs which offer intensive around the clock, mental health services
• And at the same time, the introduction of the qualified residential treatment program has expanded the
• And new placement models have emerged such as the behavioral qualified residential treatment program
• Initiative has been the development of the behavioral qualified residential treatment program to provide
• The Behaviour qualified residential treatment program was created to serve children with intensive behavioral

Keywords: 999, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• We ensure that students returning from hospitalization or treatment programs receive a smooth transition
• c> smooth</c> or treatment programs receive a smooth or treatment programs receive a smooth transition
• residential treatment options, teletherapy services, and crisis stabilization programs, and adequate
• inpatient and treatment including inpatient and residential<00:19:51.080><c> treatment</c><00:19:51.679
• ><c> options</c> residential treatment options residential treatment options teletherapy<00:19:53.600

Keywords: 1187, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• </c><00:01:35.480><c> with</c> of the Office of Statewide Programs with of the Office of Statewide Programs
• State-funded treatment court model.
• </c> change will not uh remove treatment change will not uh remove treatment services<00:07:44.000><c
• </c><00:14:04.320><c> Many</c> staff and program management. Many staff and program management.
• </c> diversion programs. diversion programs.

Keywords: 958, all

Summary: The Budget Review Subcommittee on Justice and Judiciary received an update from the Administrative Office of the Courts on implementation of House Bill 504, the judicial branch budget, and court facility projects. AOC leaders said they do not anticipate problems balancing the outgoing biennium or fiscal year 2026, and explained that the budget changes were driven by the need to reduce costs while preserving required constitutional, court-rule, and statutory services. They also said the new filing fee increases authorized by HB 504 took effect that day and are expected to generate up to $5 million, while the reorganization is projected to save about $3 million in general fund dollars. The bulk of the presentation focused on a major reorganization of the Office of Statewide Programs, which includes specialty courts, family and juvenile services, and pretrial services. AOC said the plan eliminates 170 positions and creates 109 new ones, mainly by reducing middle-management layers, expanding regional service delivery, and cross-training staff. Officials said 110 employees had already been offered or accepted placements, 24 had chosen voluntary separation, and the final number of employees leaving remains fluid until the process concludes around August 1. They emphasized that specialty court programs were not eliminated, but state-funded treatment court contracts and behavioral health liaison positions were removed, with treatment costs shifted to Medicaid or participants where appropriate. Members asked about the process, staffing impacts, specialty court participation, juvenile services, and how AOC will monitor the changes. AOC said the reorganization was developed by leadership, HR, and legal staff under direction of the Chief Justice and approved by the Supreme Court, and that it is intended to improve efficiency and frontline support rather than reduce services. They said specialty court participant levels are being watched closely, that CDW services will continue to use outside providers for programming, and that the agency will keep judges and stakeholders informed as the new structure goes into effect. No votes were taken, and the committee did not approve minutes because a quorum was not present.

Transcript Highlights:

• Quite honestly, I think what they do is they refer them to a program like Sex Abuse Treatment Center
• Quite honestly, I think what they do is they refer them to a program like Sex Abuse Treatment Center
• Quite honestly, I think what they do is they refer them to a program like Sex Abuse Treatment Center
• Quite honestly, I think what they do is they refer them to a program like Sex Abuse Treatment Center
• Quite honestly, I think what they do is they refer them to a program like Sex Abuse Treatment Center

Keywords: 910, house, all

Summary: The committee heard testimony on several measures related to housing, homelessness, caregiving, and tax relief. On HB 431, which appropriates funds for the CAL initiative and HHFDC, the Department of Human Services supported the bill and noted the Governor’s request for $50 million per year for HMS, the need for more permanent supportive housing, and a technical issue with establishing a special fund in session law. The Statewide Office on Homelessness and Housing Solutions strongly supported the measure, describing it as unprecedented funding for CAL projects and linking it to goals of reducing homelessness and expanding housing inventory. Catholic Charities Hawaii, the ACLU of Hawaii, and the Reimagining Public Safety in Hawaii Coalition also supported the bill, emphasizing permanent supportive housing, diversion from jail, and public safety benefits. The chair redirected one testifier to stay on the measure when testimony drifted to another program. Written support was also noted from several organizations and agencies. The committee then heard HB 225 on squatting. DHS said it appreciated the intent and deferred to the Attorney General and task force members, while noting that outreach on public lands differs from private land, where owner consent is required. The Office of the Public Defender supported the bill and wanted a voice in finding a solution. The Statewide Office on Homelessness and Housing Solutions also said it supported the intent, while opposition from the Kingdom of the Hawaiian Islands and support from one individual were noted. For HB 280, which would make the community outreach court permanent and appropriate funds, the Judiciary strongly supported the bill, describing the court as a mobile, community-based program serving vulnerable populations and connecting participants to services. The Office of the Public Defender also supported the measure, saying the program has helped people move off the streets and into stable housing and that permanent funding would allow expansion. Written support from the Hawaii Substance Abuse Coalition was noted. The committee then moved to HB 71, creating a refundable family caregiver tax credit, where the Department of Taxation provided comments, the Executive Office on Aging and AARP Hawaii supported the measure, and the Tax Foundation of Hawaii raised concerns about duplication with an existing dependent care credit and the lack of incentives for cost control. The committee next heard HB 753, which would increase the applicable percentage for the household and dependent care services tax credit. Support came from the Executive Office on Aging, Catholic Charities Hawaii, AARP Hawaii, and Hawaii Children’s Action Network, while the Tax Foundation again raised technical concerns about complexity and administration but noted the bill adds guardrails against abuse. No votes were taken during the portion of the hearing provided.

Transcript Highlights:

• doctor who has any knowledge of the disease to only 5% of rare diseases having any FDA-approved treatment
• </c> but these disease modifying treatments but these disease modifying treatments come<00:04:53.320>
• State agencies typically have an average of four FTE to do the work, and there are some programs that
• State agencies typically have an average of four FTE to do the work, and there are some programs that
• that we initiated with that programs that we initiated with that amount<00:09:56.680><c> that</c><00

Keywords: 919, house, all

Summary: The committee heard House File 1501, which would fund the Minnesota Rare Disease Advisory Council and make the current fiscal year 2025 budget its permanent base. Representative Murphy said the bill would provide about $342,000 in general fund money for the 2026-27 cycle and argued that the council helps shorten diagnosis times, support research, and keep Minnesota a leader in rare disease work. Erica Barnes, the council’s executive director, testified in support and explained that the council was established in 2022 to improve care for the estimated one in 10 Minnesotans living with a rare disease. She said the council needs the full $668,000 level it operated with this year to maintain its statutory duties, noting that the current ongoing base is about $326,000 and that the extra funding was previously one-time money. Barnes described the barriers faced by rare disease patients, including long diagnostic delays, limited provider knowledge, and the fact that only a small share of rare diseases have FDA-approved treatments. She said rare disease care is costly to the health system and that the council has used prior funding to convene the community more regularly and carry out its work. Representative Leing questioned why the budget should be doubled and asked what additional work the council would do with the higher amount; Barnes responded that without the larger ongoing appropriation the council would fall back to 1.8 FTE and would have to stop some programs. Representative Hingson Jger spoke in support, saying the council’s collaboration has been valuable for policy work in the genetic and rare disease space. In closing, Murphy emphasized Minnesota’s leadership in rare disease and shared a personal story about how diagnosis and treatment changed his family’s life. No public testimony was offered. The chair then laid House File 1501 over for possible inclusion in the omnibus bill.

Transcript Highlights:

• And what we see is that there are a lot of different programs that are funded.
• It doesn't foreclose still, you know, having an encroachment permit program.
• It functions as a right-to-counsel program.
• We are also participants in the current iteration of the fellowship program.
• We are also participants in the current iteration of the fellowship program.

Summary: The committee heard several bills focused on civil rights, housing, public safety, and administrative process. Early items included SB 46, which would authorize the Secretary of State to remove constitutionally ineligible presidential and vice presidential candidates from California ballots; SB 1078, requiring notice to the Civil Rights Department when court filings involve civil rights violations; SB 989, expanding access to Care Court by letting first responders refer cases through county behavioral health agencies; SB 998, clarifying and expanding discrimination prevention coordinators in the new Office of Civil Rights; SB 1146, requiring disclosure for AI-generated health advertisements and giving physicians a limited private right of action; SB 1164, a California Voting Rights Act expansion responding to federal voting-rights rulings; SB 1256, a housing bill aimed at limiting repeated litigation over the Harmony Grove Village South project; SB 1267, addressing HOA liability and indemnification for EV charger installations; and SB 1425, authorizing an encroachment permit program for high-speed rail right-of-way management. The committee also later heard SB 873, restricting ICE arrests near courthouses, and SB 1160, requiring eviction data reporting by zip code. Most bills drew support from sponsors, advocacy groups, labor organizations, or local officials, while opposition centered on concerns about county workload, due process, fire safety, civil liberties, or the scope of the policy changes. Members generally expressed support for the bills while noting unresolved issues and the need for amendments or further stakeholder work, especially on SB 1164, SB 1256, SB 1267, SB 1425, and SB 1160. The Judicial Council opposed SB 1160 because of the burden of adding zip-code reporting to court systems, while the author and supporters argued the data would help target eviction-prevention efforts. SB 873 drew strong support from public defenders, immigrant-rights groups, and court-related stakeholders, with the San Bernardino County Sheriff’s Department opposing. SB 989 drew support from firefighters and family advocates, while Disability Rights California opposed, arguing Care Court is too costly and diverts resources from community-based services. SB 1164 received broad civil-rights and voting-rights support, with cities opposing unless amended over definitions, cure periods, and litigation risk. SB 1256 drew support from housing and labor interests and opposition from local residents and environmental groups concerned about fire safety and evacuation. SB 1267 was supported by the HOA and utility stakeholders after amendments addressing liability concerns. After quorum was established, the committee voted to pass a consent calendar and then approved the listed bills, sending them to the appropriate committees or to Appropriations, including SB 46, SB 873, SB 989, SB 998, SB 1078, SB 1146, SB 1164, SB 1256, SB 1267, and SB 1425. The transcript ends with SB 1160 still under discussion, with members indicating support for the bill’s goals but acknowledging the Judicial Council’s implementation concerns and the need for further work.

Transcript Highlights:

• This bill addresses the currents, really great swim lesson voucher program.
• This bill does not authorize any new treatment or prescribing authority.
• Psychiatry residency slots in Florida have increased from 22 slots at 3 programs to 176 slots at 28 program
• The Legislature's continued investment in the frame program.
• But this program is working. It's making a measurable difference across Florida.

Transcript Highlights:

• discuss legislation which aims to require health insurance coverage for early-stage Alzheimer's treatments
• There are now two FDA-approved treatments designed to slow dementia progression for those in the early
• As Susan mentioned, there are two new life-changing treatments available that can slow the progression
• By mandating insurance coverage of new FDA-approved Alzheimer's treatments for Minnesotans on private
• So we took the plunge and agreed to start lmab treatments in November of '23.

Keywords: 1187, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• And so they have seen a lot of use more in that program.
• So they're getting copies of the pre-sentence investigation, treatment notes, treatment information,
• , education programs, supportive programs, treatment programs.
• These programs exist in prison.
• Statutorily, it is called a release program.

Keywords: 908, all

Transcript Highlights:

• programs.
• This is an area of bipartisan policy concern given that opioid treatment programs are the only licensed
• programs.
• </c> homes as well as opioid treatment homes as well as opioid treatment programs.<00:08:15.280><c> Most
• Most of the evidence to date programs.

Keywords: 1183, house

Transcript Highlights:

• Could those programs be challenged as programming designed with preference or reference to protected
• Programming, AD engagement staff.
• Could those programs be challenged as programming designed with preference or reference to protected
• Would they be caught up in your bill as being preferential treatment or programming to one particular
• program that is strictly a STEM program for girls.

Keywords: 999, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• We are endeavoring to create a pilot program.
• And so he is working to put a program in place.
• Court approval is required before anyone enters the program.
• This is not a release program.
• This is not a release program.

Keywords: 974, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• </c> Enforcement Foundation Program Fund. Enforcement Foundation Program Fund.
• The purpose of foundation program fund.
• She helped develop an ocular disease residency program.
• </c><00:51:38.440><c> House</c> opportunity program in Kentucky.
• House opportunity program in Kentucky.

Keywords: Convene 00:00 Senate Message 05:49 Calendar/2nd Readings 06:27 Report of Committees 08:12 Orders of the Day/HB 485 09:40 HB 43 23:13 HB 139 25:09 HB 414 31:49 HB 297 36:16 Motions, Petitions, and Communications 41:08 Introduction of New Bills and Resolutions 51:25 Recess for ConC/Rules Meeting 53:41 ConC/Rules Report 56:40 Floor Amendments 57:54 Adjournment 58:17, 958, all

Transcript Highlights:

• PROGRAM REVIEW, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS PERFORMANCE MEASURING PROGRAM WITH SECRETARY DIXON.
• SO AS IT RELATES TO PROGRAMS WE KNOW THAT IF WE INVOLVE INDIVIDUALS IN EDUCATION PROGRAMMING THEY HAD
• WITH THEIR PROGRAM THERE.
• THOSE PROGRAMS ARE INDEPENDENTLY PROCURED AND CONTRACTED FOR SPECIFIC TREATMENT PURPOSES.
• THOSE ARE PROGRAMMING SERVICES.

Keywords: 999, senate, all