Video & Transcript Research : 'data analysis'

Page 158 of 500
AL

Alabama 2026 1st Special Session

Alabama Senate County and Municipal Government Committee Mar 10th, 2026

County and Municipal Government

Transcript Highlights:
  • The federal government has not so far failed to act in creating a nationwide data privacy bill.
  • The federal government has not so far failed to act in creating a nationwide data privacy bill.
  • The federal government has not so far failed to act in creating a nationwide data privacy bill.
  • The federal government has not so far failed to act in creating a nationwide data privacy bill.
  • The federal government has not so far failed to act in creating a nationwide data privacy bill.
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Trade, Workforce & Economic Development May 14th, 2025

Trade, Workforce & Economic Development

Transcript Highlights:
  • The fact that consumer reporting agencies buy and sell our data among each other and among third-party
  • The intent of the bill is absolutely the protection of DNA data.
  • We'll now have to add a data tag to scenarios of DNA studies, as well as use the already limited time
  • That's an intellectual property—the ownership of the DNA data.
  • Johnson relating to the regulation of certain business entities that act as data brokers.
MN

Minnesota 2025 1st Special Session

House Human Services Finance and Policy Committee 3/13/25

Human Services Finance and Policy

Transcript Highlights:
  • We can gather data to create proposals to address identified gaps for veteran eligibility for state and
  • As a data privacy and protection professional, I appreciate that you emphasized it is read-only.
  • So for any data that is being accessed, are we getting authorization from the individual?
  • How will these be determined, and what data supports these definitions?
  • How will these be determined, and what data supports these definitions?
AZ

Arizona 2026 Regular Session

02/11/2026 - House Appropriations

Appropriations

Transcript Highlights:
  • So the main thing we're trying to do with this bill is making sure that our genetic sequencing, or data
  • Data centers have obviously been a huge new sector that's grown very fast in Arizona.
  • centers, but also what the effect is on... ...small modular reactors and data centers, but also what
  • Nevertheless, without any kind of data metrics, there's just anecdotal evidence back and forth.
  • Are there any results or data tracking college entrances?
Summary: The committee first heard HB 2584, which would prohibit public funds from being used for genetic sequencing equipment made by companies owned or controlled by entities domiciled in a foreign adversary. The sponsor said the bill is intended to prevent sensitive genetic data from being sold or used against the United States. There was little public testimony, and the committee approved the bill on a 13-5 vote for a do pass recommendation. Members then considered HB 2804, a rural development and housing tax credit bill that would let the Department of Housing allocate up to $2 million per year in credits for qualifying rural affordable housing projects, with the program set to expire in 2037. Supporters, including the sponsor, the mayor of Flagstaff, and housing investors and developers, said the credit would leverage federal LIHTC dollars, attract private capital, and help finance affordable housing for seniors, veterans, and low-income residents in rural Arizona. Opponents from the Arizona Free Enterprise Club argued state LIHTC programs are inefficient, costly, and hard to oversee. The committee passed the bill 13-4. The committee also heard HB 2388, as amended, which appropriates $100,000 to the Arizona Commerce Authority to study the economic benefits of small modular reactors and data centers, with a report due by June 30, 2027. Supporters said the study could help Arizona plan for future energy and data-center growth, while opponents argued the agency already has other funding sources and should not receive additional money for the study. The amended bill passed 10-7. After a presentation from Auditor General Lindsay Perry on county treasurer procedural reviews and the Santa Cruz County embezzlement case, the committee approved HB 2352, which provides $2,385,900 in FY 2029 for the Auditor General to continue county treasurer reviews, on an 11-7 vote. The committee then unanimously approved HB 2418, as amended, which directs $600,000 to be evenly distributed among five major incident task force counties and codifies the longstanding distribution practice. Finally, the committee took up HB 2499, the first of two ESA administration bills, which would appropriate $2.6 million and 12 FTEs to the Department of Education for ESA administration and oversight beginning in FY 2027; the bill drew extended debate about ESA growth, accountability, testing, and spending oversight, but the transcript cuts off before the final vote.