Transcript Highlights:

• Home without a required safety review.
• House Bill 776 makes sure little ones receive timely safety checks when serious safety concerns are reported
• This case is made a priority for a safety assessment.
• Instead, it focuses on preventative safety.
• plans and help ensure the safety of kids.

Keywords: 989, all

Summary: The House Health and Welfare Committee approved the minutes from March 4, 6, and 11, 2026, and then heard Senate Bill 1256, a DOGE Task Force code cleanup measure requested by the Commission for the Blind and Visually Impaired to remove outdated statutory language about a 1990 report. The committee sent SB 1256 to the floor with a due pass recommendation without opposition. The committee then took extensive testimony on House Bill 776, which would require the Department of Health and Welfare to rapidly verify and prioritize safety reviews for infants under one year old when reports involve parents with serious child-abuse histories, prior terminations of parental rights, or prenatal drug exposure. The sponsor and supporters framed the bill as a narrow, preventive response to the death of a Nampa infant, Benji, emphasizing that it would not automatically remove children but would trigger faster review and safety assessment. Supporters included foster parents, a hospital social worker, a psychologist, a nurse practitioner, a former foster youth, a police officer, and others who described delayed CPS responses, repeated family histories of abuse, and the need for quicker intervention to protect newborns. Opponents and skeptics raised constitutional and due process concerns, arguing the bill could expand government authority, resemble preemptive or “red flag” style action, and risk overreach against parental rights. Some members said the underlying problem was CPS performance rather than the law itself, while others argued the bill simply speeds up an existing response and does not create a presumption of abuse. After debate, the committee adopted a roll call vote and sent HB 776 to the floor with a due pass recommendation, 12-4-4.

Transcript Highlights:

• Good morning, Chairs and Senate Public Safety members.
• First, I want to thank you as the Chair of Senate Public Safety and the Chair of Assembly Public Safety
• Firearm safety is crucial, and safety training needs to be at the forefront of everyone's minds when
• Firearm safety is crucial, and safety training needs to be at the forefront of everyone's minds when
• According to the National Rifle Association's gun safety rules, at the NRA firearm and education safety

Summary: The Senate Committee on Public Safety met on March 17, 2026, with no quorum at the start and throughout much of the hearing, so bills were presented and discussed but no final votes were taken. The committee heard SB 936 on nitrous oxide sales, SB 941 on commissary price caps in private immigration detention facilities, SCR 118 urging release of Jeffrey Epstein-related files, SB 1009 on juvenile detention standards, AB 46 on mental health diversion, and SB 948 on firearm safety training and registration for new residents. The chair explained public comment procedures and noted that SB 891 was on consent, but the transcript focused on the other measures. SB 936 drew strong support from the author, prosecutors, local officials, and public health/environmental groups, who described rising misuse of flavored large nitrous oxide canisters, youth targeting, impaired driving crashes, deaths, and waste disposal costs. Opposition from the ACLU argued the bill was too broad and should use a regulatory rather than criminal approach, warning about overreach into ordinary household items. Members generally expressed support, though some asked for narrowing amendments to avoid unintended coverage. SB 941 was presented as a cap on markups for commissary goods sold to detainees in privately run federal immigration detention facilities, modeled on prior prison commissary limits. Supporters described severe price inflation for basic necessities and the burden on families, while no opposition testified. SCR 118, calling for full release of unclassified Epstein investigation files, was supported by the author, a survivor statement, and anti-trafficking advocates; one member objected that the resolution could implicate people without full facts, while others emphasized transparency and survivor accountability. SB 1009 and AB 46 both centered on criminal justice discretion: SB 1009 would require clear and convincing evidence before detaining youth and was supported by defenders and youth advocates but opposed by probation and district attorneys who warned about public safety and resource constraints; AB 46 would narrow mental health diversion by allowing judges to deny diversion when public safety is at risk, with prosecutors and victims’ families supporting it and public defenders, ACLU, and behavioral health groups opposing it as an unnecessary restriction on treatment. SB 948 would expand firearm safety certificate requirements to include live-fire training and require new California residents to register firearms within 60 days; the author and gun-safety advocates supported it as a common-sense safety measure, and the hearing moved into support testimony as the transcript ended.

Transcript Highlights:

• Uh, and that is railway safety, railroad safety. Uh, and that is railway safety, railroad safety.
• safety? safety?
• All of that improve safety. safety. safety.
• ><c> safety,</c> So, safety, safety, safety, safety, So, safety, safety, safety, safety, safety,<00:46
• </c> safety, safety. safety, safety. So,<00:46:04.800><c> Mr.

Keywords: 916, all

Summary: The committee opened by taking roll for the Joint Transportation, Highways, and Military Affairs Committee and noting that 20 topics had been submitted for discussion, including one late addition. Members were asked to number the topics for reference, and the chair explained that each presenter should give a brief overview before the committee returned to the dais for questions and possible ranking or action. No votes were taken during the portion provided. The first topic was a request from the Associated General Contractors of Wyoming to have TRIP, a third-party transportation research organization, present a report on Wyoming’s highway system. The report is intended to identify transportation needs and 25 priority projects, and the committee generally supported hearing the report and methodology directly from TRIP. The next topic combined two similar railroad safety proposals. Representative Chestek described a bill addressing train length, wayside detectors, and track inspections, citing the East Palestine derailment and concerns about reduced inspection frequency. Committee members raised questions about federal preemption and enforcement authority; Chestek said states can be more protective of safety where federal rules leave gaps, and WYDOT said it would need additional expertise and staffing to administer such a program. No public testimony was offered on the railroad topic. The committee then heard two proposals from the Wyoming Military Department. One would study Tricare subsidies for mental health providers by comparing Tricare reimbursement rates with other insurers, gathering de-identified data on eligible members and provider participation, and then returning to the committee with findings before any legislative recommendation. Members discussed whether the issue might fit better in Labor, Health, and Social Services, but the military department said it believed the committee had a strong connection to the topic. The second military topic would study Service Group Life Insurance for state active duty, comparing state and federal death benefits for Guard members to identify any shortfalls. The committee also briefly discussed a VSO program review raised by Representative Neff, focusing on the number of veterans service officers and retention, but no action was taken in the excerpt.

Transcript Highlights:

• But then the UL proceeded to look at those safety risks and to solve for them in the safety standards
• So the safety standards issued by the U.L., which will be Safety standards.
• account the safety risks and solve for them.
• UL has not set the safety standards for these systems.
• , we're always going to be erring on safety as well.

Summary: The committee first heard SB 868, the Plug and Play Solar Act, which would streamline approval for portable plug-in solar devices for homes and apartments. The author and supporters argued the bill would help renters and other Californians lower electric bills, expand access to solar, and create statewide safety standards through UL certification and the National Electrical Code. Opponents, including electrical workers, firefighters, utilities, and PG&E, raised concerns about shock, fire, backfeeding, older electrical systems, and the bill bypassing the California Electrical Code and Building Standards Commission process. After extended discussion and testimony from UL, the author agreed to add California Electrical Code language, and several opponents indicated they would move to neutral; the committee then passed the bill out as amended to the Senate Judiciary Committee on a roll call vote. The committee then took up SB 886, which would establish rules for large data centers to prevent electricity cost shifts to other ratepayers. The author and supporters said rapid data center growth could drive major grid costs and that the bill would require data centers to pay for their own infrastructure, participate in demand response, and secure new zero-carbon resources. Supporters included environmental and consumer groups, while opponents such as the Data Center Coalition, Silicon Valley Leadership Group, utilities, and business groups argued the bill was unnecessary, could duplicate CPUC proceedings, and might impose operationally risky mandates, especially around demand response and backup power. Committee staff described amendments narrowing the bill to large data centers, clarifying tariff and cost-allocation provisions, replacing behind-the-meter storage with a pre-funded long-term clean energy contract, and exempting certain public and critical facilities; the discussion continued with questions about cost responsibility, clean energy targets, and peak-load management.

Transcript Highlights:

• And that's what this is safety.
• </c><00:16:46.160><c> So</c> with the department of safety. So with the department of safety.
• uh gun safety courses and most safety uh gun safety courses and most<00:20:00.960><c> courses</c><00
• </c><00:43:41.839><c> It</c> safety. It's about political cover. It safety.
• </c> years and also added the safety valve. years and also added the safety valve.

Keywords: 1189, house, all

Transcript Highlights:

• Um, and we believe that the purpose of licensing is health and safety, assuring the health and safety
• </c> and safety of children. and safety of children.
• </c> health and safety and less on quality. health and safety and less on quality.
• </c> kind of going from health and safety kind of going from health and safety licensed<00:13:25.600>
• </c><00:36:30.800><c> They</c> children's health and safety. They children's health and safety.

Keywords: 1183, house

Transcript Highlights:

• Good morning, chairs and Senate Public Safety members.
• First, I want to thank you as the Chair of Senate Public Safety and the Chair of Assembly Public Safety
• Firearm safety is crucial, and safety training needs to be at the forefront of everyone's minds when
• Firearm safety is crucial, and safety training needs to be at the forefront of everyone's minds when
• According to the National Rifle Association's gun safety rules, at the NRA, firearm education and safety

Summary: The Senate Committee on Public Safety met on March 17, 2026, beginning without a quorum and hearing several bills and a resolution. SB 936 by Senator Blakespear would prohibit retail sale of nitrous oxide canisters larger than 8 grams while preserving legitimate medical, dental, culinary, and automotive uses. Supporters, including prosecutors, county officials, and local government groups, described rising misuse among youth, impaired driving crashes, deaths, and environmental waste from large flavored canisters. The ACLU opposed unless amended, arguing the bill was too broad and should use a regulatory approach rather than criminal penalties; the author said amendments were being considered to narrow the language. Committee members largely expressed support, though some raised concerns about wording and implementation. SB 941 by Senator Padilla would extend a prison commissary price cap framework to private for-profit immigration detention facilities under federal contract in California. Supporters said detainees and their families face extreme markups on basic necessities and that the bill would curb exploitation. There was broad support from immigrant justice, civil rights, and disability rights organizations, and no opposition testimony was presented. SCR 118 by Senator Gonzalez urged release of unclassified Jeffrey Epstein investigation files. Supporters framed it as a transparency and survivor-accountability measure, with testimony from CAST and a survivor statement. One committee member voiced concern about incomplete facts and the risk of political overreach, while others supported the resolution as part of broader anti-trafficking efforts. SB 1009 by Senator Becker would require clear and convincing evidence before detaining youth in juvenile proceedings and would emphasize less restrictive alternatives. The author and supporters argued that detention harms youth, increases recidivism, and is overused, citing a personal witness who described spending more than 200 days in juvenile detention before her case was resolved. Probation, district attorneys, and AFSCME raised concerns that the bill could limit judicial discretion, strain county resources, and create public safety risks or uneven implementation. Committee members were split, with some supporting the bill as a needed safeguard and others saying the system needs more resources before changing the standard. AB 46 by Assemblymember Nguyen would narrow mental health diversion by allowing judges to deny diversion when public safety is at risk. Supporters, including district attorneys and a crime victim’s family, said current law is too restrictive and has allowed dangerous offenders to reoffend; opponents, including public defenders and the ACLU, argued diversion is already limited and effective and that the bill would reduce access to treatment. Finally, SB 948 by Senator Aegian would require more comprehensive firearm safety training for firearm safety certificates and require new California residents to register firearms and obtain a certificate within 60 days. Supporters, including Brady and youth gun violence advocates, said the bill would close loopholes and improve safety; gun rights groups opposed, calling it an unconstitutional financial barrier and a burden on new residents.

Transcript Highlights:

• Good morning, chairs and Senate Public Safety members.
• Good morning, chairs and Senate Public Safety members.
• First, I want to thank you, as the Chair of Senate Public Safety and the Chair of Assembly Public Safety
• Firearm safety is crucial, and safety training needs to be at the forefront of everyone's minds when
• According to the National Rifle Association's gun safety rules, firearm safety is paramount.

Keywords: 987, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• And safety is our top priority at MassDOT.
• And we talk about safety, and a Tier 1 scooter is here.
• In product safety compliance, rating is not the conclusion.
• consumer safety in this context.
• I am here, and I founded the Boston Community Safety Coalition.

Keywords: 995, all

Summary: The Joint Committee on Transportation held a hybrid hearing on the governor’s Ride Safe Act, S. 3077, and related micromobility bills. Chairs and administration officials described the bill as a statewide, speed-based framework for e-bikes, scooters, mopeds, and similar devices, intended to replace outdated device categories with clearer rules for age limits, helmets, equipment, operating locations, registration, insurance for higher-speed devices, and restrictions on tampering. They also emphasized improved crash-data collection, a working group for future updates, and battery safety standards such as UL certification to reduce fire risk. Committee members asked about enforcement, shared-use paths, commuter rail accommodations, battery storage, and how the bill would apply to other vehicles like quads; the administration said some issues would need further study or follow-up. Testimony from advocates, municipal officials, and commission members was mixed but generally supportive of clearer statewide rules. Transportation and safety advocates backed the speed-based tier system but urged additional measures, including a default speed limit on shared-use paths, automated enforcement, and more funding for Complete Streets and Shared Streets programs. Bike shop and police representatives said current laws are confusing for riders and law enforcement and that better definitions and data reporting are needed. Several speakers stressed that enforcement and education will be critical, and that local patchwork rules are difficult to apply consistently. Medical testimony strongly supported tighter protections for young riders. Pediatric emergency and trauma doctors described a sharp rise in serious injuries and deaths involving e-bikes and scooters, including severe pediatric cases, and urged amendments adding a minimum age for faster devices and a universal helmet requirement. They argued that the force and weight of these devices make crashes more dangerous than conventional bicycles and pointed to past Massachusetts safety laws as evidence that age and equipment restrictions can reduce injuries. Some public testimony opposed the bill as written, especially from moped commuters who argued that gas-powered mopeds are being treated differently from comparable electric devices and should be included in the framework. They called for clearer rules on bike-lane access, insurance, parking, and statewide standards for mopeds as vulnerable road users. No votes were taken during the hearing; the committee heard testimony and questions only.

Transcript Highlights:

• As we are all for safety and improving any safety measures, we feel that the items in Colby's... ...improving
• any safety measures.
• And I think that maybe a safety committee is more in line with providing safety measures as opposed to
• Have other remedies, safety bales.
• Public safety must come first. That is why I... ...greater risk. Public safety must come first.

Summary: The hearing covered several public safety bills and related testimony. On S. 2681, “Colby’s Law,” which would establish safety standards for BMX/motocross tracks, the committee heard emotional testimony from the family of a teen killed at a track and from advocates who said minimum standards are needed for barriers, medical staff, emergency planning, insurance, and oversight. A track owner and rider also testified that safety is important but argued the bill was incomplete and should better distinguish between BMX and motocross and include more specific equipment and weather-related rules. On S. 2680, a bill to expand emergency planning around aging nuclear plants and high-level nuclear waste sites, supporters from Cape Cod, medical groups, and anti-nuclear organizations urged a 50-mile emergency planning radius and stronger state preparedness, citing risks from long-term waste storage and inadequate federal oversight. The committee also heard testimony on a Barnstable home rule petition to allow certain emergency response vehicles to use red lights, with the town supporting the change to improve response times on the water. A substantial portion of the hearing focused on H. 5158, the Protect Act, which would limit state and local cooperation with federal civil immigration enforcement. County sheriffs testified about how ICE notifications and detainers work in practice, distinguishing between criminal warrants and civil immigration requests to notify, and describing their discretion when people are released on bail or at the end of a sentence. Sheriffs said they generally notify ICE when requested, especially in cases involving serious charges, but emphasized the need to balance public safety, victim notification, and due process. Committee members pressed them on the impact of ICE pickups at courthouses and jails, and several lawmakers and witnesses argued that pretrial detainees taken by ICE can disrupt prosecutions and deny victims their day in court. Supporters of the Protect Act included labor, education, health care, and immigrant advocacy groups. They said immigrants and mixed-status families are living in fear of routine interactions with police, schools, courts, and hospitals, and urged the committee to ban 287(g) agreements, prohibit law enforcement from asking about immigration status or providing operational assistance to ICE, and add stronger protections for sensitive locations such as schools and health care facilities. Medical witnesses described patients and families avoiding care because of ICE presence, and educators said students are missing school out of fear. No votes or final actions were taken during the hearing; the committee heard testimony and indicated it would continue receiving written testimony before taking action later.

Transcript Highlights:

• </c> safety or flight concerns. safety or flight concerns.
• </c> released regardless of legitimate safety released regardless of legitimate safety concerns<00:15
• </c> about ensuring that a public safety about ensuring that a public safety decision<00:17:22.480><c
• </c> decision is made using public safety decision is made using public safety factors<00:17:24.959><
• The idea of public safety factors being used for public safety decisions has some merit.

Keywords: 1183, house

Transcript Highlights:

• Financial bail is not necessary. reduces community safety over the long reduces community safety over
• ,</c><00:09:47.120><c> but</c> concerned about public safety, but concerned about public safety, but
• </c> somebody's safety needs. somebody's safety needs.
• </c> safety needs into account. safety needs into account.
• . safety.

Keywords: 1183, house

Transcript Highlights:

• </c> years first and foremost a campus safety years first and foremost a campus safety advisory<00:41
• The safety advisory committee.
• I had followed some of the work of the Campus Safety Coalition and the formation of the campus safety
• I had followed some of the work of the Campus Safety Coalition and the formation of the campus safety
• Coalition we organized this safety Coalition we organized this campus<00:52:48.760><c> safety</c><00

Keywords: 1183, house

Transcript Highlights:

• We're answering a child safety problem.
• We're answering a child safety problem.
• What parents want and what they deserve is safety by design, with the strongest privacy and safety protections
• Anyway, we should have safety defaults.
• They can use it for safety, too.

Keywords: 988, house, all

Transcript Highlights:

• But then the UL proceeded to look at those safety risks and to solve for them in the safety standards
• So the safety standards issued by the UL, which will be Safety standards.
• the safety risks and solve for them.
• , that will continue to update. safety, that will continue to update the safety issues with regrets of
• Which, good or bad, you know, safety, we're always going to be erring on safety as well.

Summary: The committee heard extensive testimony on SB 868, the Plug and Play Solar Act, which would streamline approvals for portable plug-in solar devices while setting safety standards. The author and supporters argued the bill would help renters and homeowners with high electricity bills by allowing low-cost balcony solar systems to reduce monthly costs, and they emphasized that the devices would not feed power back to the grid. Supporters included environmental and consumer groups, solar advocates, and many members of the public. Opponents, including electrical workers, firefighters, utilities, and PG&E, raised concerns about shock, fire, overloading, and the need for California-specific building standards. After discussion, the author agreed to committee amendments and later to add compliance with the California Electrical Code in addition to the National Electrical Code; several opponents said that change would move them to neutral. The committee then voted to pass SB 868 out as amended to Senate Judiciary, with some members expressing support while reserving concerns about safety as the bill moves forward. The committee then took up SB 886, dealing with data center electricity use and ratepayer protections. The author said the bill is intended to prevent large data centers from shifting grid and infrastructure costs onto other customers, citing rapid growth in data center demand and examples from other states. Supporters, including TURN and climate groups, said the bill would require data centers to pay for their own grid impacts, pre-fund long-term clean energy resources, participate in demand response, and cover related costs. Opponents from the data center industry, tech and business groups, utilities, and some energy users argued the bill was unnecessary, could duplicate CPUC processes, and could create discriminatory rate treatment or operational problems, especially around mandatory demand response and limits on backup generation. Committee staff described amendments narrowing the bill to large data centers, clarifying tariff and cost-allocation provisions, replacing a storage requirement with a long-term zero-carbon procurement mechanism, and exempting certain public and utility facilities. Members discussed the balance between affordability, reliability, and clean energy, with the bill framed as a way to protect ratepayers while allowing data center growth.

Transcript Highlights:

• Bill 2112 will greatly expand safety manager training and associated site safety requirements.
• Bill 2112 will greatly expand safety manager training and associated site safety requirements.
• Therefore, safety must come first.
• The unions invest heavily in safety.
• It's all about safety.

Keywords: 995, all

Summary: The joint committee held a public hearing on several bills covering state administration, land/public housing redevelopment, construction safety, memorialization, records management, rural grant equity, and animal research. Testimony in support of H. 3329 described an inequity in the Governor’s Council reimbursement statute, which currently cuts off travel, meals, and lodging reimbursement after four terms; the witnesses argued this disproportionately burdens members from western Massachusetts and creates geographic and economic barriers to service. The Boston Housing Authority supported legislation for the Brighton/Faneuil Gardens area, saying it would allow a mixed-use redevelopment that replaces all existing public housing units one-for-one, adds new affordable housing, creates replacement rehearsal space for displaced musicians, and preserves prevailing wage standards. A major portion of the hearing focused on S. 2112, a construction safety bill. Suffolk Construction, Boston building trade representatives, and local inspectors testified that the measure would strengthen training, site safety standards, oversight of high-risk work, and enforcement, while helping protect workers and the public and improving retention and recruitment of inspectors. Witnesses said the bill would align Massachusetts more closely with higher safety standards in other states and build on lessons from past construction-related incidents. The committee also heard support for S. 2162, which would create a COVID-19 memorial; the witness emphasized the scale of pandemic deaths in Massachusetts and the educational value of public memorials. Other testimony addressed H. 3321, which would modernize records preservation for registers of deeds by reducing reliance on costly microfilm in an increasingly electronic system; the witness said current law is outdated and expensive. H. 3311, aimed at advancing equity for rural communities receiving state grants, drew support from town officials in Leyden and Ashfield, who said small towns lack staff for grant writing and should be evaluated more on need and regional impact, especially for climate and public safety projects. Finally, S. 2117, concerning animal research, was supported by an animal welfare advocate who urged prohibiting state funds for animal experiments and shifting to non-animal research methods. After the hearing concluded, the chairs noted that additional hearings and polling votes would follow, and the committee then adjourned.

Transcript Highlights:

• WE ARE DEFINITELY TALKING SAFETY. AS MS.
• FROM A SAFETY PERSPECTIVE I FEEL THIS IS PARAMOUNT.
• HOUSE BILL 283 IS SCHOOL ZONE AND PEDESTRIAN SAFETY.
• I APPLAUD YOU LOOKING OUT FOR PUBLIC SAFETY.
• I WANT TO GO BACK AND EXPOUND UPON THE SAFETY.

Transcript Highlights:

• The Federal Rail System Safety Act allows for state laws addressing local safety hazards in the absence
• The Federal Rail Safety Act specifically allows states to regulate railway safety.
• safety and operational efficiency.
• You know, cost of safety, what is the cost of safety? But to answer your question, I don't know.
• This bill is public safety.

Keywords: 987, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• But in public safety, I think both parties recognize the number one purpose of government is the safety
• is road or driver safety.
• </c><00:01:13.360><c> Committee</c> Judiciary and Public Safety Committee Judiciary and Public Safety
• It's a safety of its citizens.
• 13.120><c> safety.

Keywords: 1187, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• The Federal Rail System Safety Act allows for state laws addressing local safety hazards in the absence
• The Federal Rail Safety Act specifically allows states to regulate railway safety.
• safety and operational efficiency.
• But public safety, safety of, as I said, with the crews and the trains and everything else, we'll address
• This bill is public safety.

Summary: The committee first heard SB 220, which would require Los Angeles Metro to submit an expedited governance reform report to the Legislature in light of Measure G and the upcoming creation of a countywide elected executive. Senator Allen said the bill was intended to prompt a locally driven discussion about how Metro’s board should reflect the new county structure, not to prescribe a specific governance plan. Metro and the City of Los Angeles opposed the bill, arguing that local task forces and an ad hoc Metro committee were already studying the issue and that the bill was premature and unnecessary. Several committee members echoed local-control concerns, while others supported keeping the bill alive as a vehicle for further discussion. The bill was moved on a do-pass motion to Appropriations and ultimately recorded at 7-2, with the measure held on call for absent members. The committee then heard SB 667, the California Railway Safety Act, which would require freight railroads to install wayside detector systems at specified intervals, with different treatment for short-line railroads, and would require railroad response plans to be submitted to the CPUC. The author and labor supporters argued the bill would help prevent derailments like the East Palestine disaster by detecting overheated bearings earlier and improving crew notification and inspection protocols. Railroads and business groups opposed the bill, saying the spacing mandate and related requirements would be costly, could slow freight and passenger operations in shared corridors, and might discourage investment in short-line infrastructure. After extensive discussion about safety, preemption, costs, and passenger rail impacts, the committee passed the bill to Appropriations on a 7-2 vote, with the measure also held on call. Finally, the committee took up ACR 71, which designates a portion of State Route 101 in Santa Clara County as the Little Saigon Freeway. The author and numerous supporters described the designation as a recognition of San Jose’s Vietnamese American community, its refugee history, and the cultural and commercial importance of Little Saigon. There was no opposition testimony. Members spoke in support, including comments about the connection between the San Jose and Orange County Vietnamese communities. The resolution was adopted and sent to Appropriations on a unanimous roll call among those present, with 10 votes recorded before the chair returned.