Transcript Highlights:

• employee health benefits to reflect updated benefit and retirement rate changes in the budget year; statutory
• The budget includes statutory changes to eliminate the pilot program, however we maintain a certain baseline
• The budget also includes statutory changes to eliminate the pilot program, however we maintain a certain
• plans in the out years to restore the jury duty pilot program, and I should note that we also have statutory
• education-based privileges for incarcerated college students and support the mental health licensure trailer if amended

Summary: The subcommittee heard May Revision presentations for the Office of Emergency Services, Judicial Branch, CDCR, and the Department of Justice, with the LAO offering comments and recommendations throughout. For Cal OES, the administration outlined funding for relocating the Red Mountain communications site, increased FEMA reimbursement authority, cybersecurity grants, next-generation 911 support, and a reduction to the Flexible Cash Assistance for Survivors of Crime program. Members raised concerns about VOCA backfill and disaster reimbursement, while the LAO recommended approving the 911 request with reporting, adding contingency planning for cybersecurity grants, clarifying the FEMA reimbursement language, and increasing reporting on emergency spending. For the Judicial Branch, the May Revision included funding for implementation of the Trial Nations Access to Justice Act, reductions tied to court facilities and employee benefits, and General Fund solutions such as a reduction to the pretrial release program, a reversion from the Trial Court Trust Fund, and elimination of the jury duty pilot program. The LAO cautioned that the pretrial reduction could affect detention and release decisions and recommended tighter legislative oversight over the trust fund transfer and reallocation language. Members questioned the impact of the pretrial cut, the lack of Prop. 36 court funding, and the rationale for the jury pilot elimination; the Judicial Branch said it was generally supportive of the budget as proposed. CDCR presented requests for roof repairs, fire alarm replacements, CalAIM-related costs, and trailer bill changes on incarcerated college students, mental health hiring, and tuberculosis testing, along with a planned prison closure by October 2026. The department also proposed reducing or delaying several items, including radio replacement, ADA improvements, COVID mitigation, and some facility upgrades, while adding a $125 million placeholder for consultant-driven operational savings. The LAO recommended rejecting or reducing several San Quentin-related proposals, questioned the staffing and contract medical requests, and urged more transparency on the consultant savings plan; members expressed concern about the realism of the savings targets and the potential legal or operational risks from delaying ADA and radio projects. For DOJ, the May Revision proposed ongoing funding and 44 positions to defend against federal actions, IT and accounting system upgrades, implementation funding for AB 1877, and a special fund loan. The LAO supported the KLETS connection but asked for a contingency plan if the new DMV link is delayed, noted that AB 1877 would not be fully implemented without additional funding, and recommended limiting and reporting on the federal accountability workload. Members questioned the size and permanence of the DOJ request, the use of the earlier $25 million special session appropriation, and the pace of federal litigation; DOJ said the new request would support ongoing litigation, expert assistance, and coordination across multiple cases and states.

Transcript Highlights:

• And, Madam Chair, there's one amendment. Go ahead, Madam Chair.
• The amendment is adopted. I move Senate Bill 1425, as amended, receive a due pass recommendation.
• My question is related to the 14th Amendment.
• is adopted please move the bill as amended I move Senate bill 1328 as amended we see we do pass recommendation
• No amendments. I move SCR 1013 receive a do-pass recommendation. No amendments, no discussion.

Bills: SB1285, SB1289, SB1326, SB1328, SB1329, SB1330, SB1392, SB1402, SB1425, SCR1013, SCR1014

Keywords: sentencing, correctional facilities, multiple sentences, death penalty, aggravating circumstances, juvenile offenses, class 2 felony, foreign donations, election administration, certification, Arizona Revised Statutes, transparency, public disclosure, victims' rights, attorney fees, government accountability, right to counsel, legal representation, parents' rights, family law

Summary: The committee approved the minutes and then took up several election, family court, and criminal justice bills. SB 1425, the “big bill,” would move Arizona’s 2026 primary election date earlier and adjust related election administration timelines; the chair’s amendment moved the primary to July 21 and removed the shortened curing/ID deadlines. County officials testified in support, explaining the timing changes and the need to align dates, and the committee adopted the amendment and gave the bill a do-pass recommendation. SB 1289, dealing with certifications for entities providing money or resources for election administration and foreign funding disclosures, also received a do-pass recommendation after testimony from supporters arguing it would block foreign influence in election administration and ballot issue spending. The committee later heard SCR 1013, a related resolution that would more directly prohibit foreign-source money for election administration and ballot measures; the sponsor and supporters said it was similar to SB 1289 but broader, and testimony focused on foreign money flowing through nonprofit networks. The committee then considered SB 1326, which would allow courts to award attorney fees and costs to victims when a party violates or worsens a victim’s rights. A victim’s attorney testified that the bill would provide needed accountability and guidance, while opponents argued the term “exacerbates” was vague and that existing remedies already exist. The committee approved SB 1326 on a 4-3 vote. SB 1402, requiring courts to impose a fee on certain probationers to cover electronic monitoring costs, drew support from the sponsor and advocates who said offenders should pay for monitoring, and opposition from defense attorneys who warned it could burden indigent probationers and divert money from treatment; it also received a 4-3 do-pass recommendation. The most extensive debate was on SB 1330, which would allow a parent in certain custody cases to request a jury trial on parenting time or legal decision-making. Supporters, including several parents, described costly and traumatic family court experiences and argued a jury would provide a neutral check on judges and court-appointed professionals. County and court representatives opposed the bill, saying family cases require specialized judicial expertise, jury trials would delay urgent matters, increase costs, and risk confidentiality. Despite those concerns, the committee adopted the bill on a 4-3 vote. The committee also approved SB 1328, which declares state policy favoring parental rights and a child’s equal access to both co-parents, after adopting an amendment adding legislative intent language. Finally, SB 1329, which would let parents sue court-appointed professionals who deviate from professional ethics or standards in custody matters, passed 4-3 after testimony from parents and advocates who said court appointees lack accountability, while opponents said existing malpractice and licensing remedies already address misconduct.

Transcript Highlights:

• Without objection, we will adopt amendment number three.
• Without objection, we will adopt amendment number four.
• We are now back on the bill as duly amended.
• There is an amendment in the bill I'd like to adopt.
• Without objection, we will adopt the amendment. We're back on the bill as amended.

Bills: SB378, SB540, SB1061, SB1475, SB1531, SB1534, SB1684, SB1824, SB1826, SB2049

Keywords: bail bondsman, bondsman license, multicounty agent bondsman, surety bondsman, Insurance Commissioner, bail bond regulation, bond deposit, forfeiture, deposit ratio, writing capacity, license transfer, power of attorney, surety bond, bail industry, Oklahoma insurance law, financial solvency, administrative action, SB1061, Oklahoma Secure and Fair Enforcement for Mortgage Licensing Act, SAFE Act

Transcript Highlights:

• and with those amendments I'm recommending a support with do pass to re-refer to the appropriations
• On AB 775 Fong the motion is do pass as amended and be re-referred to the Committee on Appropriations
• We presented some amendments to the author's office. They're currently reviewing them.
• Historically, the statutory process of certification has been unconstitutional.
• The motion is do pass as amended and be re-referred to the committee on appropriations. Bennett?

Keywords: 988, house, all

Transcript Highlights:

• We have House 199, an act to amend the Safe Haven Law to extend the time frame for voluntary placement
• right to rest, eat, pray, and be in public spaces by updating the Commonwealth's public spaces laws, amend
• The current budget and statutory language do require ... ...applying for TAFDC.
• The current budget and statutory language do require verification of pregnancy from a medical provider
• I am now a plaintiff in a federal lawsuit regarding violations of the First Amendment.

Keywords: 995, all

Summary: The committee hearing covered a wide range of child welfare, family support, and human services bills. Testimony strongly supported a guaranteed cash stipend for young adults aging out of foster care (S.161), with the Attorney General’s Office, youth advocates, and foster care providers describing high rates of homelessness and poverty after exit from care. Providers also urged action on a resolve to study the foster care liability insurance crisis (H.197/S.1280), saying premiums and coverage losses are forcing program cutbacks and could reduce foster care capacity statewide. Another major topic was a direct care worker medication administration program registry (H.237/S.162), which supporters said would help recruit and train workers, especially bilingual staff, to address workforce shortages in human services. Several bills focused on child protection and child welfare system practices. Supporters of H.267/S.145 called for advance notice to children’s attorneys when placements or other major events change, arguing that timely communication is essential to prevent unnecessary disruption and improve advocacy. Testimony also backed legislation to formally recognize and strengthen children’s advocacy centers and the Massachusetts Children’s Alliance (H.233/S.112), with prosecutors and CAC leaders describing the trauma-informed model as a longstanding, effective response to child abuse and trafficking. A bill to establish a Massachusetts children’s cabinet (S.115) drew support from advocates who said cross-agency coordination is needed to align policy and funding for children’s well-being. The committee also heard testimony on bills addressing safety, equity, and family support. Senator Lovely and survivors supported S.152, which would create a civil cause of action for sexual abuse by adults in positions of authority or trust, with witnesses describing grooming and power imbalances in schools and youth-serving settings. H.274, a bill of rights for people experiencing homelessness, was supported by advocates who said it would add anti-discrimination protections and voting and privacy rights amid rising criminalization of homelessness. H.272/S.171 to protect maternal health received support from Rep. Montaño, MLRI, and a physician, who said the bills would make cash assistance available earlier in pregnancy and remove the medical-verification barrier. H.4216 on equitable hair care for children in state custody was supported by social workers and advocates who said hair care is tied to identity, dignity, and mental health. H.255 on empowering early educators drew testimony about barriers faced by renters and condo owners trying to open home-based child care programs. H.217, concerning resources and support for pregnant and parenting families, drew testimony from anti-abortion pregnancy resource center advocates. No votes were taken during the hearing, and several bills had no one signed up to testify or were deferred when witnesses were unavailable.

Transcript Highlights:

• Today, I will be presenting on a budget bill, Junior, which amends the 2025 Budget Act and associated
• This bill is largely technical and amends the 2025 TK-12 education trailer bill.
• Among other things, this bill amends the accrual schedule for Prop 98 through 2030, allows the Department
• Most notably, the bill includes statutory changes to: - Expand exemptions from CEQA and coastal development
• This bill would enact various statutory changes related to housing programs to implement the Budget Act

Keywords: 988, house, all

Transcript Highlights:

• This bill had an amendment added in the House that raises some concerns.
• I wanted to amend this bill and for the House to offer a substitute because the bill did not address
• I'm told if the Senate offers an amendment or substitute for this bill, it will effectively...
• Second, we need to implement the statutory updates in House Bill 2187, which were developed in concert
• Unfortunately, during the pandemic, we saw a breakdown in the statutory system as everyone. ...entered

Bills: HB107, HB742, HB1639, HB1700, HB2071, HB2187, HB2402, HB2516, HB3211, HB4529, HB5342, HB694, HB923, HB4655, HB107

Keywords: sickle cell disease, registry, health data, confidentiality, healthcare access, human trafficking, first responders, health care, training, reporting, protection, cancer, female firefighters, health study, state health services, fire protection, telemedicine, teledentistry, telehealth, health records

Transcript Highlights:

• We have several statutory requirements. All of our loans must be $250,000 or greater.
• We have a several statutory<00:04:05.680> requirements.
• All of our loans statutory requirements.
• Uh, the qualitative is looking at the people, the developers, and the statutory requirements.
• The motion prevails and the amendment is adopted.

Bills: HF2986, HF3555

Keywords: virtual power plant, VPP, distributed energy resources, DER, demand response, load management, grid modernization, peak demand, peak shaving, battery storage, energy storage, solar photovoltaic, solar panels, electric vehicles, smart thermostats, heat pumps, aggregator, public utilities commission, PUC, rate recovery

Transcript Highlights:

• Kane has put in a pink sheet. with an amendment to establish open with an amendment to establish open
• But that wasn't the statutory intent.
• But that wasn't the statutory<01:32:53.600> intent.
• And I suspect if we statutory intent.
• Sorry, that's a statutory authority.

Keywords: 1189, house, all

Transcript Highlights:

• WITHOUT OBJECTION SHOW THE AMENDMENT ADOPTED.
• DEBATE, WITHOUT OBJECTION SHOW THE AMENDMENT ADOPTED, LET'S TAKE A EOG AMENDMENT P2026 – 105. >> SIMILAR
• THAT IS THE AMENDMENT. >> Chair McClure: QUESTIONS, DEBATE, WITHOUT OBJECTION SHOW THE AMENDMENT ADOPTED
• PUBLIC TESTIMONY, DEBATE, SHOW THE AMENDMENT ADOPTED.
• LET'S TAKE UP AMENDMENT EOG W2026002, YOU ARE RECOGNIZED. >> THIS AMENDMENT MAKES MODIFICATIONS TO PROJECTS

Keywords: 999, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• for all of the EPA's staff, especially senior leadership, to understand how the agency's use of statutory
• Zabel, under what specific statutory conditions can EPA deny a... waiver request.
• Thank you. 0% of chemicals approved within their statutory guideline.
• Szabo, do you each commit to implementing statutory... directives in the Renewable Fuels Standard to
• It's important that we hit our statutory timing obligations for setting RVOs.

Transcript Highlights:

• the bill, and I just wanted to mention that LBR is funded, which is 6% above the FY26 estimate, statutory
• the bill, and I just wanted to mention that LBR is funded, which is 6% above the FY26 estimate, statutory
• We will probably have a floor amendment to increase that.
• Once I have that number, we'll probably have a floor amendment.
• We do have a strike all. amendment to increase that. Uh the Port amendment to increase that.

Keywords: Appropriations - Room 216, 12 March, 2026; 10:30 AM, 925, all

Summary: The committee began by noting the plan to suspend the rules later that afternoon so several measures could be taken up on the floor, including bills that may be on final passage or contain reverse repealers. Members were reminded to clearly identify which bills were final passage measures so the chamber would know it might be the last opportunity to vote on them. The committee then moved through a series of appropriations bills. In the education and judicial budgets, Senator DeBar explained House Bills 1928, 1933, 1935, 1936, and 1937, covering the legislative operations budget, DFA buildings reappropriations, K-12 education, MPB, and the library commission. He described increases for teacher pay, special education supplements, testing contracts, ELC coaches, financial literacy, ESA funding, and other adjustments, along with reductions in some areas and a decline in student enrollment affecting the funding formula. The bills were adopted by title sufficient, do pass, with strike-all motions where applicable. Senator Wiggins presented House Bills 1924, 1926, 1927, 1930, and 1931, covering the Attorney General, Capital Postconviction Council, district attorneys and staff, the Office of State Public Defender, and the Supreme Court/AOC budget. He highlighted salary increases for agency attorneys, human trafficking funding, new district attorney positions from judicial redistricting, public defender support for family defenders and the rural legal services pilot, and major court-system items such as judicial salary increases, youth court intake, CCID courts, and the MyCIDS replacement system. Questions focused on the meaning of personal services, vacancy funding, and possible use of opioid settlement funds for AOC; the committee was told those issues could be handled through the reverse repealer or other vehicles. The bills were advanced, with the committee noting which ones contained reverse repealers and which were final action. Subcommittee 5 and 6 then handled human services, health, licensing, and transportation-related measures. House Bills 1906, 1909, 1912, and 1921 covered Child Protective Services, Human Services, Medicaid, and Rehabilitation Services, with explanations for new attorney positions, salary and vacancy funding, SNAP administration, Medicaid agency funding, and restoring positions in rehab services. House Bill 1908 for the Department of Health added money for Jackson water litigation and public health priorities such as obesity management, remote monitoring, cancer screenings, and maternal-infant health. House Bills 1913, 1914, 1915, 1917, and 1918 were taken up together for licensing boards, with most changes described as cloud services, PIN restoration, or vacancy funding; only the Board of Medical Licensure bill had a reverse repealer. Finally, Senator Thompson handled special fund and transportation bills, including the Port Authority, waterway and river districts, Yellow Creek, and MDOT. He noted overtime concerns at the Port Authority, special-fund increases for contractual services and capital improvements at the water districts, and MDOT increases for salaries, commodities, equipment, and the three-year highway plan. Senator Wiggins raised a question about utility relocation costs in transportation projects, saying some municipalities were being told to pay those costs themselves; Senator Thompson said he would follow up with MDOT.

Transcript Highlights:

• I just want to mention that I think, as you all know, The Legislative Council Service takes its statutory
• This could be for bills, amendments, substitutes, certificates, memorials, et cetera.

Keywords: 996, all

Transcript Highlights:

• Chair, there's an amendment. I'd be happy to explain. Yeah, Mr.
• No amendments, please call the roll. Senator Bolick, aye.
• Nobody has to amend.
• Which ones would have to be amended returns? Mr.
• We had an amendment from the House, came back this way.

Bills: SB1042, SB1043, SB1044, SB1135, SB1136, SB1142, SB1180, SB1221, SB1252, SB1254, SCR1003

Keywords: public funds, virtual currency, bitcoin, investment, Arizona Strategic Digital Asset Reserve Act, state treasurer, retirement system, state payments, cryptocurrency, Arizona law, payment methods, government transactions, property tax, tax exemption, Arizona Revised Statutes, digital currency, workers' compensation, death benefits, burial costs, spousal compensation

Summary: The committee began with staff and page introductions, then took up a series of previously heard bills, mostly related to cryptocurrency and tax administration. SB 1042, SB 1043, SB 1044, and SCR 1003 dealt with allowing public entities to invest in virtual currency, accept cryptocurrency payments, and exempt virtual currency from property tax. Supporters framed the measures as modernization, while opponents argued crypto is risky, fraudulent, and a poor use of public funds. All four measures were recommended do pass on narrow 4-3 votes, with Democrats generally opposed. The committee also heard SB 1221, which would require the Department of Revenue to notify legislative tax chairs before adopting a new interpretation or application of tax law that could adversely affect taxpayers. The sponsor said the bill was meant to front-load disputes and avoid surprise tax changes; it passed 4-3. SB 1142, which would have Arizona opt into a new federal scholarship tax credit program and require ADOR to administer it, drew extensive testimony. Supporters said it would expand scholarship opportunities for students in public, charter, private, and home education settings and keep donations in Arizona. Opponents argued it would divert money from public schools, lack accountability, and primarily benefit wealthier families. The bill passed 4-3 after lengthy debate. The committee then questioned Department of Revenue officials about a press release on Arizona tax forms and federal conformity after H.R. 1. Members focused on why the department told taxpayers not to wait to file, how the state conforms to federal changes, and whether amended returns would be needed if the Legislature changes the forms later. DOR said the forms were issued assuming conformity, that most taxpayers would not be affected by pending changes, and that amended returns could be required for some retroactive provisions; members criticized the guidance as confusing and potentially costly. Finally, the committee heard SB 1254, which would require both grantor and grantee signatures on conveyance documents before recording, to reduce deed fraud and clarify acceptance of property transfers. County assessors supported the bill, saying it would close a loophole and improve records; it passed 6-0 with one member not voting. The committee then began SB 1252, the Uniform Assignment for Benefit of Creditors Act, with testimony from the Arizona Uniform Laws Commission explaining that it would create a more uniform framework for asset assignments and creditor claims, but the transcript cuts off before any vote on that measure.

Transcript Highlights:

• either because they're a statutory either because they're a statutory repeat<00:46:41.040> offender
• Uh, what I will say is that individuals have the First Amendment right to film officers out in public
• So you do have the First Amendment right to film police, film ICE, film agents if you see them carrying
• right to film officers first amendment right to film officers out<01:04:58.480> in<01:04:58.720
• right to film police, film amendment right to film police, film ICE,<01:05:08.000> film<01:05

Keywords: 910, house, all

Summary: The Committee on Public Safety held an informational briefing on findings from the deportation data project and possible policy responses to increased federal immigration enforcement in Hawaii. In opening remarks, the chair said the committee was concerned about changing federal executive orders, policies, and enforcement actions, and framed the issue as one involving due process and public safety. The chair and presenters described reports of ICE activity on multiple islands, including raids, courthouse presence, and fear in immigrant communities, and said the committee was considering whether state policies should be advanced more quickly. Mandy Fernandez of the ACLU of Hawaii presented updated deportation data and argued that increased immigration enforcement is creating fear, reducing crime reporting, and potentially making state and local agencies extensions of the federal immigration agenda if they accept federal funding with conditions. She said the deportation data project, housed at UC Berkeley Law with UCLA’s Center for Immigration Law and Policy, uses FOIA requests and its latest data runs through late July 2025. She reported 153 ICE arrests in Hawaii from January through July 2025, up from 41 in the same period in 2024; 96 removals, up from 15; a federal detention center average daily population of 91 in June 2025 versus 31 in June 2024; and 111 ICE detainers issued in Hawaii from September 2023 through July 2025, with 49 issued in 2025. She also cited an immigration court backlog of 1,144 pending cases as of August 2025 and noted that about one in five Hawaii residents were born outside the United States. Haley Chang of the Office of the Public Defender said her office is seeing a marked increase in ICE presence around courthouses and more ICE contacts with clients, including reports of people being detained after court appearances or while on supervision. She emphasized that the office is not an immigration law office and that much of its information is anecdotal, but said the pattern appears new compared with prior years. In response to committee questions, she explained that ICE detainers are requests, not judicial warrants, and said local law enforcement is generally not required to honor them unless accompanied by a judicial warrant or other legal authority. She also said the public defender’s office had not yet seen new criminal charges arise solely from an ICE detention or failure to appear tied to immigration enforcement, though cases could be affected if defendants are removed from the criminal process.

Transcript Highlights:

• Gentlelady, is this a friendly amendment? And gentlelady, is this a friendly amendment?
• Yes, we are getting the updated amendment. This will be Amendment Number Three.
• Is this a friendly amendment? Madam Speaker, the amendment is unfriendly.
• Your amendment seems to be only those individuals. I cannot accept your amendment.
• Speaker, this is a friendly amendment. Okay, so a debate on the amendment.

Bills: HB145, HB164, HJR6, HR1, HB20, HB65, HB66, HB80, HB166, HB295, HB306, SB29, SB37, HB99, HB206, HB213, HB270, HJR5, SB104, SB193, HJM2, HJM3, HJM1, HM7, HM17, HM4, HM22, HM23, HM24, HM26, HM2, HM16, HM32, HM13, HM47, HM20, HM51, HM1, HM31, HM35, HM36, HM46, HM53, HM54, HM39, HM11, HM14, HM21, HM34, HM50

Keywords: high-wage jobs, tax credit, job creation, New Mexico, economic development, lobbying, transparency, public records, government oversight, accountability, constitutional amendment, legislative sessions, veto override, New Mexico legislature, session length, House Resolution 1, HR1, House investigatory subcommittee, special committee, legislative investigation

Transcript Highlights:

• But I have an amendment, and I'd like to pass out the amendment, to put some belt and suspenders, just
• Wilson, could you read in Amendment 3875? Thank you, Mr. Chairman. Members, this is Amendment 3875.
• We would also like to see the bill amended to state that any litigation... ...amended to state that any
• And I do have amendments.
• Members, this is Amendment Set 3848-38-48.

Bills: SB480, HB621, HB637, HB804, HB841, HB1056

Keywords: fishing gear, Oyster Bayou, shrimping, regulation, marine resources, HB621, Act 658, renewable energy, recycling, decommissioning, wind energy, solar power, solar facilities, wind turbines, energy infrastructure, end-of-life disposal, universal waste, recyclable materials, waste reduction, Department of Environmental Quality

Transcript Highlights:

• That, all of the allocation of the in-state program is really well outlined in statutory code regarding
• I think by pausing it, it'll, we'll have some productive dialogue that we may be able to do some statutory
• I know any time that we have a statutory change to the Legacy Fund, we try to get a cost-benefit analysis
• I'll see if Representative Bosch is okay amending his motion. I would amend my motion and then ask.

Keywords: 908, all

Transcript Highlights:

• Would be to simply amend subsection C to remove the prohibition on using those values for tax purposes
• this bill's structure or reconsider it. reject it until somebody comes up with a more equitable amendment
• boards over directors from adopting reappraisal plans. appraisal plans that do not conform with the statutory
• Under the current statutory framework, they are incentivized. to file a suit, which in turn reduces their
• But this bill uses different language. and under basic principles of statutory construction different

Bills: HB1952, HB3258, HB3524, HB3851, HB4478, HB4613, HB4703, HB4742, HB4744, HB4809, HB4864

Keywords: county appraisal district, board of directors, governance, taxing units, public representation, penalty, property report, taxation, timely filing, chief appraiser, appraisal district, ad valorem tax, property appraisal, tax protests, unequal appraisal, property rights, property tax, public employees, protest leave, appraisal review board

Transcript Highlights:

• NO FURTHER QUESTIONS WE WILL MOVE NOW TO AMENDMENTS. THERE ARE NO AMENDMENT.
• THERE ARE NO AMENDMENTS. WE WILL GO INTO PUBLIC TESTIMONY NOW. FIRST IN PUBLIC TESTIMONY WE HAVE.
• DO WE HAVE PUBLIC TESTIMONY ON THE AMENDMENT? NO PUBLIC TESTIMONY. DEBATE?
• LET SHOW THE AMENDMENT IS ADOPTED. BACK ON THE BILL AS AMENDED.
• MOVING INTO PUBLIC TESTIMONY ON THE BILL AS AMENDED. JENNIFER HOBGOOD WITH AMERICAN SOCIETY.