Video & Transcript Research : 'state representative objection'

Page 156 of 500
TX

Texas 89th 2nd C.S.

Natural Resources Apr 23rd, 2025

Natural Resources

Transcript Highlights:
  • Please state your name, who you represent, your position on the bill. My name is Justin Dribalblis.
  • Wells, if you could please state your name, who you represent, and your position on the bill for the
  • You could please state your name, who you represent, and your position on the bill for the record.
  • TAG represents 91 of the 98 groundwater conservation districts from around the state.
  • If you could please state your name, who you represent, and your position on the bill for the record.
Summary: The Committee on Natural Resources heard House Bill 2109, which would remove certain long-proposed reservoir projects from the state water plan after 50 years without progress. Chairman Van Deaver and many landowners, local officials, timber interests, and conservation advocates testified in support, arguing that the Marvin Nichols Reservoir has burdened Northeast Texas landowners for decades with the threat of eminent domain, depressed property values, and uncertainty over homes, farms, ranches, schools, churches, and cemeteries. Supporters also said the project would flood tens of thousands of acres, require extensive mitigation, harm timber and agriculture, and that Texas now has better alternatives such as conservation, reuse, aquifer storage and recovery, and desalination. Several members expressed sympathy for the affected families and questioned whether a project could remain in the plan indefinitely without progress. Opposition came from North Texas water interests, including the North Texas Commission, Tarrant Regional Water District, and the Texas Water Association, who argued that the bill would interfere with the state’s long-term water planning process and remove needed future supply options for a fast-growing region. They said Region C faces major projected shortages by 2070, that conservation and reuse have already delayed the need for new supplies, and that reservoirs remain one tool in the state’s water-planning toolbox. TWDB staff explained the existing inter-regional conflict process and noted that the substitute would affect several unique reservoir sites, not just Marvin Nichols. After testimony, Chairman Van Deaver closed by urging passage of the bill, but the committee withdrew the substitute and left HB 2109 pending. The committee then took up House Bill 5188, a brackish groundwater bill. The author said the bill would reduce permitting burdens for wells in designated brackish groundwater production zones, and the committee substitute added requirements on monitoring, groundwater-rights ownership, and allocation of pumpage limits while removing some exclusions and export-fee provisions. Texas Wildlife Association testified against the bill, warning that the exemptions could weaken groundwater conservation districts’ ability to protect freshwater resources and surface-owner rights. San Antonio Water System testified in favor, saying brackish groundwater is a key future supply and that the substitute would help speed development of desalination and brackish projects. The Texas Alliance of Groundwater Districts testified neutrally but raised concerns about reduced district oversight, especially around injection-well exclusions and the loss of export fees, and said discussions on the bill were ongoing.
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Natural Resources Apr 23rd, 2025

Natural Resources

Transcript Highlights:
  • Representatives of the groundwater conservation districts across the state have provided valuable feedback
  • Please state your name, who you represent, and your position on the bill.
  • Wells, if you could please state your name, who you represent, and your position on the bill for the
  • You can please state your name, who you represent, and your position on the bill for the record.
  • Our TAG represents 91 of the 98 groundwater conservation districts from around the state.
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Natural Resources Apr 23rd, 2025

Natural Resources

Transcript Highlights:
  • Representative Ashby? Here. Representative Berry? Here. Representative Bell? Here.
  • Representative Buckley? Here. Representative Farrelly? Here.
  • Representative Gomez, Representative Garcia, Representative Gonzalez, Representative Romero. Petal.
  • Objection, the bill will be left pending. Is there objection?
  • Barrett if you could please state your name, who you represent, and your position on the bill for the
TX

Texas 89th Regular

S/C on Transportation Funding Apr 14th, 2025

S/C on Transportation Funding

Transcript Highlights:
  • State your full name, who you represent, and your position on the bill.
  • Remember, each rail car represents four semi-trucks on the state highways.
  • You must either represent yourself and state what your position is.
  • I can't have you stating that you're representing other people or alluding to that you're representing
  • Please step forward and state who you represent and your position on the bill.
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Judiciary & Civil Jurisprudence Mar 12th, 2025

Judiciary & Civil Jurisprudence

Transcript Highlights:
  • The Texas Association of Business, we're the state chamber for the state of Texas.
  • We believe there is a significant value in having our legal state of incorporation in a state where we're
  • Yes, Representative Flores.
  • Yes, Representative Schofield. Hi, Representative.
  • Yes, Representative Schofield.
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Judiciary & Civil Jurisprudence Mar 12th, 2025

Judiciary & Civil Jurisprudence

Transcript Highlights:
  • a state prosecutor's state annual salary.
  • As the data shows, and as has already been stated, when tenants are represented in court, their chances
  • For all the reasons stated, it's... stated here today.
  • Secondly, HB32 represents a dramatic departure from established state procedural norms.
  • Because the privilege to be your state representative, I feel like we have the responsibility, and definitely
TX
Transcript Highlights:
  • Any objections? Hearing none, it's all ordered.
  • the United States of organized retail theft.
  • What is that impact to the state of Texas?
  • Any objections? Hearing none.
  • Any objections? Hearing none, it's so ordered. No objections? Hearing none, it's so ordered.
AL

Alabama 2025 Regular Session

Alabama Senate Feb 20th, 2025

Alabama Senate Floor Meeting

Transcript Highlights:
  • And if no objection, we could use the previous roll. All right, any objection?
  • No objection? All right, any objection? Hearing none, so ordered. Mr. Britt...
  • All right, any objection? Hearing none, so ordered. All right, any objection?
  • All right, any objection? Hearing none, so ordered. All right, any objection?
  • All right, any objection? You object? All right, you want to be recognized?
MN

Minnesota 2025 1st Special Session

House Workforce, Labor, and Economic Development Finance and Policy Committee 2/18/25

Workforce, Labor, and Economic Development Finance and Policy

Transcript Highlights:
  • Representative Natalie Zeleznikar responded: “Thank you, Representative Greenman.
  • Representative Emma Greenman continued: “Thank you, Representative Zeleznikar.
  • Thanks, Representative Baker, and Representative Znar for bringing this.
  • And I was just listening to Representative Greenman and Representative Pinto, and I believe Representative
  • Representative Baker said he had been listening to Representative Mueller, Representative Pinto, and
Bills: HF110, HF111, HF263, HF105
KY
Transcript Highlights:
  • Representative Bridges. Representative Frasier. Representative Gordon, yes.
  • Without objection, so ordered.
  • Without objection, so ordered.
  • Without objection, so ordered.
  • <00:34:27.720> States allowing reciprocity in state States allowing reciprocity in state States
Summary: The subcommittee met with a quorum, approved the minutes, and welcomed new members before taking up Council on Postsecondary Education regulations 13 KAR 2:120 and 13 KAR 2:130. The regulations, as amended by staff and agency amendments, update public university and KCTCS performance funding models to conform to 2024 Senate Bill 191 and the performance funding work group’s recommendations. Changes discussed included replacing the underrepresented minority metric with an underrepresented students metric defined as first-generation students, adding an adult learner metric, increasing the low-income degree premium, adjusting small-school and nonresident credit-hour weights, revising data aging and progression metrics, and adding STEM+H criteria in 13 KAR 2:120. Travis Pal of the Council on Postsecondary Education explained that the changes reflect the work group’s three-year review process and that the work group ultimately voted to define underrepresented students as first-generation students and to apply half-weighting between research and comprehensive universities for the new metric. Michael Frasier of the Kentucky Student Rights Coalition and Eastern Kentucky University student government opposed 13 KAR 2:120, arguing that the regulation improperly applies weights where the statute does not clearly authorize them and that the funding changes disadvantage comprehensive universities and vulnerable students. He asked the committee to find the regulation deficient or, alternatively, recommend legislative clarification and a revised fiscal analysis. Pal responded that weighting has been part of the model since 2017, that CPE was following the statute and work group recommendations, and that the model could be changed by future legislation. Members asked about the timing of the broader performance funding review, and Pal said the full model is reviewed every three years, with the next work group cycle beginning in 2026. No motion to find the regulation deficient was made, and the committee allowed the regulations to proceed to the committee of jurisdiction. The committee then approved a staff amendment to Teachers’ Retirement System regulations 102 KAR 1:195 and 102 KAR 1:340, which require annual reporting of accumulated sick leave, leave policies, and salary schedules to TRS and make technical changes to the final average salary calculation and related definitions.
HI

Hawaii 2026 Regular Session

Senate Floor Session 04-17-2026 11:30am

Hawaii Senate Floor Meeting

Transcript Highlights:
  • Any objections? If not, the motion is carried. Conferees may be named at a later date.
  • <00:05:37.240> Any<00:05:37.440> objections?
  • Any objections? If not, the discussion? Any objections?
  • <00:09:21.040> Any<00:09:21.280> objections?
  • Any objections? If there any discussion? Any objections?
HI

Hawaii 2026 Regular Session

Senate Floor Session 04-16-2026 11:30am

Hawaii Senate Floor Meeting

Transcript Highlights:
  • Any objection? If not, the motion is carried. Conferees may be named at a later date.
  • <00:02:00.000> Any<00:02:00.200> objection?
  • Any objection? If not, the discussion? Any objection?
  • Referrals and re-referrals. for state programs. for state programs.
  • If there are no objections seconded.
TX
Transcript Highlights:
  • I rise to state your inquiry.
  • State your inquiry.
  • Speaker, state your inquiry.
  • State your inquiry.
  • State your inquiry.
OK
Transcript Highlights:
  • Please recognize Representative Manger for a floor presentation.
  • They also have three speech and debate state champions.
  • This team represents the very best of Oklahoma education and the arts.
  • Please recognize Representative Blair for a presentation.
  • So, next week, be there, Aloha, Representative Sterling.
OK
Transcript Highlights:
  • Now, therefore, pursuant to the motion of Representative Robert Manger, the Oklahoma House of Representatives
  • Of Northwestern Oklahoma State University, Roberts State University, University of Oklahoma, Northeastern
  • She is a three-time state qualifier for golf.
  • She is a three-time state qualifier for golf.
  • Representative Pogomiller, you're recognized.
HI

Hawaii 2026 Regular Session

Senate Floor Session 03-23-2026 11:30am

Hawaii Senate Floor Meeting

Transcript Highlights:
  • Any objections?
  • Any<00:04:10.160> objections?
  • If there are no objections from the members, the Senate will stand adjourned until 11:30 a.m. tomorrow
  • If there are no objections from the members, the Senate will stand adjourned until 11:30 a.m. tomorrow
AL

Alabama 2026 1st Special Session

Alabama House Ways and Means General Fund Committee Feb 25th, 2026

Ways and Means General Fund

Transcript Highlights:
  • I see several members or representatives in the audience.
  • I see several members or representatives in the audience.
  • > the<00:19:58.480> in<00:19:58.640> the or representatives in the in the or representatives
  • <00:23:53.120> In Yeah, it was represent Mooney. In Yeah, it was represent Mooney.
  • interest on state account. interest on state account.
TX

Texas 89th 2nd C.S.

Disaster Preparedness & Flooding, Select Aug 22nd, 2025

Disaster Preparedness & Flooding, Select

Transcript Highlights:
  • Please state your name, who you represent, and your position on the bill for the record.
  • If you could please state your name, who you represent, and your position on the bill.
  • The chair then stated that, if there is no objection, House Bill 164 will be left pending.
  • Please state your name, who you represent, and your position on the bill for the record.”
  • “Sure, you all can go ahead and just state your name and who you represent. Hi again.
Summary: The committee met in special session to hear a series of flood, preparedness, and youth-camp safety bills, with members repeatedly noting that many of the measures were intended as planning, warning, or authority-clarifying bills rather than direct spending bills. House Bill 254 would expand eligibility for the Rural Infrastructure Disaster Recovery Program to include Kerr County and 18 other flood-affected counties by raising the GDP cap and lowering the poverty threshold; it drew no opposition and was left pending. House Bill 68 would direct a study of flood mitigation in flatland areas, especially in the Rio Grande Valley, to develop cost-effective drainage and infrastructure recommendations; local officials and advocates supported it, and it was also left pending. The committee then heard several youth camp bills tied to the recent Hill Country flooding. House Bill 75 would impose flood-aware building and site standards for youth camps near floodplains, and House Bill 71 would require camps and youth activity entities to submit emergency preparedness plans to TDEM, coordinate with local responders, and maintain readiness protocols; both bills were supported by safety advocates and camp representatives, and both were left pending. House Bill 171 would require campgrounds near flood-prone waters to give written flood-risk notice to campers and obtain signed acknowledgment; it was presented as informed consent and left pending. Testimony on these bills emphasized Camp Mystic and other recent flood tragedies, with some witnesses urging broader building-code and floodplain reforms. The committee also heard House Bill 117, which would let counties regulate impervious cover for flood mitigation in unincorporated areas. Supporters, including county officials, environmental groups, and residents, argued that rapid development in the Hill Country and other growing areas is worsening runoff and downstream flooding; opponents from the builders’ association said counties already have substantial authority and warned about overreach into rural property use. After extensive testimony, the bill was left pending. Senate Bill 18 would streamline permitting for certain flood control districts to repair dams and reservoirs and build small holding areas, and it was left pending after supportive testimony from Plum Creek Conservation District. Senate Bill 3 would create a state-backed outdoor flood warning siren program for identified flood-prone areas, funded through a grant program; witnesses generally supported it, though some cautioned that sirens are not sufficient by themselves and may not be heard indoors or in overnight storms. It too was left pending. The committee also began hearing House Bill 149 on public-safety radio interoperability, but the transcript cuts off before the bill’s full testimony or action is shown.
TX
Transcript Highlights:
  • Is there an objection? 1978. Sorry. Senate Bill 1978. Is there an objection? Hearing none.
  • Which states? Colorado, California, and others. Each of those states has different emphases.
  • In most states...
  • The states are New York, Minnesota, and California. are the states in Colorado that have adopted it.
  • In the state.