Video & Transcript Research : 'hearing process'

Page 155 of 500
MN

Minnesota 2025 1st Special Session

Conference Committee on SF3045 5/9/25

Transcript Highlights:
  • of Administrative Hearings.
  • , not voicing process.
  • , not voicing process.
  • vouching process, not voicing process. vouching process, not voicing process.
  • The first one is regarding the defined processes for absentee ballot processing.
Keywords: 1183, house
CA

California 2025-2026 Regular Session

Assembly Environmental Safety and Toxic Materials Committee Jun 30th, 2026

Environmental Safety and Toxic Materials

Transcript Highlights:
  • I hear what you're saying about transparency.
  • How does this bill, they're already regulated in all of these processes.
  • whether it's being processed according to the bill's strictures.
  • review process. ...systems, safe distances from homes, public hearings, and the usual environmental
  • review processes.
Keywords: 988, house, all
NH

New Hampshire 2026 Regular Session

House Municipal and County Government (01/30/2026)

Municipal and County Government

Transcript Highlights:
  • process.
  • I'm hearing no from the audience. I'm hearing yes from the committee.
  • <02:04:35.840> take process and that process can take process and that process can take several
  • >> Oh I and how is that process? >> Oh I and how is that process?
  • a vital part of our budgetary process. a vital part of our budgetary process.
Keywords: 1189, house, all
MN
Transcript Highlights:
  • <00:05:22.840> test comments uh before we uh hear test comments uh before we uh hear test
  • You have to go through a privately negotiated process, and in this process every meeting, phone call,
  • development variants in this process development variants in this process density<00:13:30.680><
  • negotiated process and in this process negotiated process and in this process every<00:13:57.800
  • members tell us that in this process members tell us that in this process every<00:14:07.079>
Keywords: 919, house, all
Summary: The committee heard House File 1987, the Minnesota Starter Home Act, and first adopted the A1 author’s amendment, which made minor cleanup changes, removed sections two and three, adjusted ADU language, and tweaked density language. The bill authors described the measure as a bipartisan effort to address Minnesota’s housing shortage by allowing more starter homes, duplexes, townhomes, and accessory dwelling units, while also limiting some local zoning barriers and preserving city protections in certain sensitive areas. They emphasized that the state has a large housing gap, rising home prices, and that the bill is intended as one part of a broader housing package. Supportive testimony came from the Minnesota Chamber of Commerce, Housing First Minnesota, Habitat for Humanity, AARP Minnesota, and Americans for Prosperity. These witnesses argued that workforce and starter-home shortages are hurting families, employers, and economic growth; that restrictive zoning and lengthy approval processes raise costs; and that more middle housing and ADUs would expand options for older adults, caregivers, working families, and people seeking homeownership. Several supporters said the bill would reduce regulatory barriers, lower development costs, and help communities add needed housing supply. Opposition or cautionary testimony came from city and municipal representatives, including officials from Cambridge, Eagan, and Mankato, as well as the League of Minnesota Cities and related groups. They argued that local governments already are approving substantial housing growth and need flexibility to manage zoning, parking, infrastructure, stormwater, and community input. They warned the bill could weaken local control, remove practical standards, and create unintended impacts such as more rental conversion in some neighborhoods or development without adequate infrastructure. No final vote on the bill itself was shown in the transcript beyond adoption of the A1 amendment.
NH

New Hampshire 2026 Regular Session

House Legislative Administration (01/22/2026)

Legislative Administration

Transcript Highlights:
  • that what I'm hearing? that what I'm hearing? >> Sure.<00:37:56.800> Yes.
  • <00:57:51.760> We for hearing. We can see the portal. We for hearing.
  • bills are expedited through the process. bills are expedited through the process.
  • to call uh close the hearing on that. to call uh close the hearing on that.
  • hearing on House Bill 114. hearing on House Bill 114.
Keywords: 1189, house, all
TX
OR
Transcript Highlights:
  • We perform those services within a context, a governance structure, and a process that is defined by
  • And those three values you'll hear me reference a few times.
  • All reports are thoroughly reviewed as part of our initial investigatory process.
  • The PDR process applies to those three levels of assets I mentioned in the earlier slide.
  • The PDR process applies to those three levels of assets I mentioned in the earlier slide.
Keywords: 907, all
Summary: The Joint Interim Committee on Legislative Audits met on June 17 for informational presentations. The Department of Administrative Services, through Chief Audit Executive Eli Ritchie, gave an overview of statewide internal audit requirements and the fiscal year 2025 report. He explained the difference between internal and external audit, described Oregon’s statutory and rule-based internal audit structure, and reported that 30 agencies had internal audit functions, with most meeting required standards. He said 73 audits and 49 advisory/consulting engagements were completed statewide, with strong compliance overall, though a few agencies were rebuilding audit committees after vacancies. No committee questions were raised after the presentation. The Secretary of State’s Audits Division then presented its Government Waste Hotline annual report. Director Steve Bergman and audit manager Olivia Rekhed described changes made to align the hotline with statute, including renaming it the Government Waste Hotline, creating a review panel, improving anonymity protections, removing fraud reporting from the hotline’s scope, and adjusting reporting timelines. They said hotline volume increased modestly in 2025, most reports were referred elsewhere or closed for insufficient evidence, and two reports were substantiated, including questioned costs of about $856 for personal use of a state vehicle and about $2.9 million tied to the Preschool Promise program. Committee members asked about hotline staffing, cost, anonymity, and follow-up on findings; staff said the hotline is lightly resourced, uses a contracted intake service, and referrals or recommendations are followed up through management letters and later reviews. The committee also heard an audit of the Oregon Parks and Recreation Department’s safety inspections and asset tracking. The Secretary of State’s office reported that OPRD had not consistently conducted or documented quarterly OSHA safety inspections and had incomplete asset records, including missing acquisition dates and costs for many assets. The audit made eight recommendations covering safety inspection policies, asset management guidance, tagging, reconciliations, disposition controls, training, and a new asset management system; OPRD agreed to all recommendations. OPRD officials said they had already begun training staff, improving inspection procedures, and working toward a replacement asset system, while noting operational challenges from a large, dispersed park system and manual processes. Committee members asked about what kinds of assets are tracked, how tagging works, whether items were actually being lost, and how much tracking is necessary for low-value tools; OPRD said the main issue was inconsistent classification and documentation rather than widespread loss. The meeting ended with no votes or formal actions taken.
WA

Washington 2025-2026 Regular Session

Joint Oregon-Washington Legislative Action Committee Jun 12th, 2026 at 01:00 pm

Joint Oregon-Washington Legislative Action Committee

Transcript Highlights:
  • I've learned a lot by hearing that.
  • The cost estimate validation process is a cost estimate validation process is a...
  • We go through a three-step process.
  • We go through a three-step process.
  • It's been a very great process and a very successful process so far.
Keywords: 904, all
FL

Florida 2025 Regular Session

October 8, 2025 - 03:00 PM

Transcript Highlights:
  • We do the way the process works.
  • I would be interested to hear from the district's how you felt that process, but and we will be talking
  • Can you share with us your current process or your your process for ensuring all available tax credit
  • And that process was successful.
  • 24 25 to thank you, Madam Chair. >> So the process that we had for 24, 25 is the process that we had
NH

New Hampshire 2025 Regular Session

Senate Executive Departments and Administration (02/19/2025)

Executive Departments and Administration

Transcript Highlights:
  • information as to the filing process information as to the filing process currently<00:15:50.480
  • a paper process to an electronic<00:21:36.400> process<00:21:36.799> which<00:21:37.480
  • <00:31:57.480> see has to hear see has to hear see roll<00:31:58.960> call<00:31:59.440
  • <00:40:59.920> in and we will start our next Hearing in and we will start our next Hearing
  • I've made some changes to the bill. hearings I took into great consideration hearings I took into great
Keywords: 1191, senate, all
MN

Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session

House Judiciary Finance and Civil Law Committee 3/12/26

Judiciary Finance and Civil Law

Transcript Highlights:
  • in the removal from the hearing room. in the removal from the hearing room.
  • example, I've been through this process. example, I've been through this process.
  • affected without full due process affected without full due process protections.
  • hearings like this.
  • Um, so it's refreshing to hear it really considered wholeheartedly in this hearing.
MN

Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session

Child Committee Meeting - 2025-04-01

Children and Families Finance and Policy

Transcript Highlights:
  • I love hearing your name. It's wonderful. So that is.
  • I appreciate you hearing the bill.
  • Can you guys see me and hear me okay? Yes, we hear you.
  • Can you hear me well? Yes, yes.
  • I would love to hear what the department has to say.
AL

Alabama 2026 Regular Session

Alabama House Local Legislation Committee Feb 3rd, 2026

Local Legislation

Transcript Highlights:
  • have signed up for the public hearing have signed up for the public hearing then<00:05:30.400>
  • One is that There this public hearing.
  • throughout this whole process. throughout this whole process.
  • The answer was the uh, we can't hear.
  • They caught up in the political process.
Bills: HB180
CA

California 2025-2026 Regular Session

Assembly Floor Session May 19th, 2025

California House Floor Meeting

Transcript Highlights:
  • And I’m sick of hearing deflections.
  • Rebuilding after a fire is a difficult and costly process.
  • Seeing and hearing no further debate.
  • We did about four hearings, many of you were part of that.
  • The expedited review process responds to the state's approval process, delaying the commencement of vital
Summary: The Assembly met after a quorum call, prayer, and Pledge of Allegiance, then moved through a long Daily File with several guest introductions and floor speeches. Members recognized visiting student leaders, championship football teams from Tuolumne County, Alpha Kappa Alpha members at their Capitol day, and later a descendant of Wong Kim Ark. The chamber also adopted a procedural motion allowing certain members to host guests in the rear of the chamber. Among the major policy items, AB 578 on food delivery platform refund practices passed 47-2, AB 344 on successor beer manufacturer definitions passed 61-0, AB 454 to make California’s migratory bird protections permanent passed 55-12 on the urgency clause, AB 482 updating the Table Grape Commission passed 64-1, AB 1237 to support transit access for 2026 FIFA World Cup ticket holders passed 56-15 on the urgency clause, AB 738 on wildfire rebuild solar exemptions passed 42-2, AB 1460 on 340B pharmacy access for clinics passed 41-5, AB 750 on homeless shelter oversight passed 49-1, AB 1061 on housing in historic districts passed 41-13, AB 1523 on expanding mandatory mediation thresholds passed 65-0, and AB 316 on AI-related civil liability passed 56-0. AB 761 authorizing the Monterey-Salinas Transit District to seek a sales tax ballot measure passed 47-12. The chamber also adopted several resolutions. AJR 3 urging protection of Social Security, Medicare, and Medicaid passed 53-2 after extensive debate that included criticism of federal cuts and counterarguments focused on state Medi-Cal policy and budget decisions. ACR 65 proclaiming California Tourism Month was adopted by voice vote after coauthors were added, and ACR 62 recognizing California Nonprofits Day was also adopted by voice vote with 65 coauthors. AJR 5 affirming birthright citizenship and opposing efforts to end it passed 58-1 after a lengthy, highly partisan debate centered on the 14th Amendment and the Wong Kim Ark precedent. The session also included passage of AB 571, a CEQA exemption for the Southern California Veterans Cemetery at Gypsum Canyon, which was presented as a long-running bipartisan effort to create a final resting place for Orange County veterans.
WY
Transcript Highlights:
  • probably forgot more about this process probably forgot more about this process than<00:10:09.680
  • and to follow a according to process and to follow a process<00:10:44.000> and<00:10:44.240><
  • the process. the process.
  • Um, we have a hearing.
  • Um we have a hearing. themselves up. Um we have a hearing.
Keywords: 916, all
Summary: The committee met to consider amendments to House Bill 111. It first adopted amendment number one without objection. Members then discussed a Senate amendment related to a $750,000 state match for the Central Wyoming College Jackson project, with Senator Laursen explaining the request as a way to leverage local fundraising for the final phase of the project. He said the project had been underway since 2018, that the building was nearing completion, and that the amendment was intended to encourage a local fundraising campaign rather than wait for a later appropriation. Representative Lien questioned whether the funding had gone through the usual approval process, and other members raised concerns about bypassing standard procedures, while Laursen argued the request was consistent with prior late-stage project adjustments and reflected local skin in the game. The discussion also covered a Senate amendment concerning University of Wyoming land use, specifically whether language should remain requiring open space or allow trustees more flexibility to decide between open space and parking. One member moved to delete the Senate amendment and reinsert the stricken language, but after discussion the motion was withdrawn so the committee could consider all amendments together. Members noted that the university had already been discussing the plan and that the language change would not necessarily alter the trustees’ authority, though it might protect the university. The committee then turned to a Gillette College/Enzi building amendment. Senator Driscoll said the proposal was his own and not requested by the college, and Janelle Overberlander, founding president of Gillette Community College District, testified about the history of the project, including the 2021 separation from the Northern Wyoming Community College District, prior planning for a STEM building, and the later decision to revive the project as an academic building honoring Senator Enzi. She said the building is intended to address lab space needs and support industry partners, including companies expected to bring jobs to Campbell County. Driscoll explained that the amendment would provide a dollar-for-dollar match for non-state money and require Gillette College to move to a four-mill levy, which he said would eventually make the college a net contributor to the system. The committee continued discussing the amendment and its long-term fiscal effects, but no final vote on the later amendments is shown in the excerpt.
MN

Minnesota 2025 1st Special Session

House Housing Finance and Policy Committee 3/12/25

Housing Finance and Policy

Transcript Highlights:
  • <00:01:47.880> really housing bills you're hearing really housing bills you're hearing really
  • start a process and you never know how long it's going to take.
  • start a process and you never know how long it's going to take.
  • Well understood process.
  • Can you hear me? We can hear you. Perfect, thank you. Good afternoon, Chair and committee members.
Keywords: 1183, house
FL

Florida 2025 Regular Session

November 19, 2025 - 11:00 AM

Transcript Highlights:
  • STEP UP DID NOT TIMELY PROCESS FPS EO EDUCATIONAL TUITION PAYMENTS FOR STEP UP DID NOT TIMELY PROCESS
  • AS I WILL DESCRIBE NEXT THE PAYMENT PROCESS FOR SCHOOL DISTRICTS DIFFERED SIGNIFICANTLY FROM THE PROCESS
  • SECOND ISSUE REGARDING EXTENDED BUDGET PROCESS.
  • DO PLANS TO PHASE IN BETTER PROCESSES?
  • IS THAT THE PROCESS GOING FORWARD?
MN

Minnesota 2025 1st Special Session

Committee on Human Services - 03/17/25

Human Services

Transcript Highlights:
  • Am I hearing that correctly?
  • Am I hearing that correctly?
  • The process for these is a manual claims process.
  • The committee has heard in previous hearings that our county assessment process is deeply flawed in Minnesota
  • previous hearings that our County<03:07:06.319> assessment<03:07:06.840> process<03:07:
Keywords: 1187, senate, all
NM

New Mexico 2025 Regular Session

IC - Legislative Health and Human Services Nov 7th, 2025

Legislative Health & Human Services Committee

Transcript Highlights:
  • We've been hearing rumors of that. Next slide, please.
  • So we're anxious to hear.
  • Insurers to simplify procedures and processes.
  • Guzmano, we can't hear you. I don't know if you can hear us. Hopefully, we're getting back.
  • If you can hear us, hang on and we'll...
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Senate Session Apr 9th, 2025

Texas Senate Floor Meeting

Transcript Highlights:
  • Chair hears none. The motion is adopted.
  • Hearing none. Any objection? Hearing none. All oyster lovers are okay.
  • And so I went through the process.
  • Hearing none, rules are suspended.
  • Hearing none, motion adopted.
Summary: The Senate convened with a quorum, heard an invocation, recognized a Karnes County Day delegation and the Texas Association of Museums, received a governor’s message on Texas Diabetes Council appointments, and introduced the Doctor of the Day. The chamber then took up several resolutions, including SR 388 honoring the Texas Association of Museums, and adopted SRs 380, 382, and 387 by voice vote. Senator King was excused due to a family death, and the journal reading was dispensed with. The Senate then moved through a series of bills, most of them on expedited suspension of the regular order and three-day rule. Measures passed included SB 868 on Rural Volunteer Fire Department Assistance Program funding for high-wildfire-risk areas; SB 264 exempting certain family motor-vehicle transfers from tax; SB 2112 on oyster mariculture penalties; SB 1484 on catfish labeling and marketing; SB 660 on bollards near hospital emergency rooms; SB 1809 creating offenses for gift card fraud; SB 32 and SJR 81 providing business personal property tax relief and a related constitutional amendment; SB 1267 modernizing boat titling and adding disclosure for hidden hull damage; SB 1470 allowing DPS data sharing for voter list maintenance; SB 2406 and SB 2407 implementing Sunset recommendations for the Sabine River Authority and Lower Neches Valley River Authority; SB 609 on school district compliance with legally required policies; SB 921 on ex parte Medicaid eligibility renewals; SB 2320 increasing DWI penalties; SB 1822 requiring disclosure and oversight of AI-based utilization review algorithms; SB 693 on notaries public and deed theft prevention; and SB 664 setting statewide qualifications and oversight for magistrates and related judicial officers. One of the most contested items was SB 779 on common law public nuisance claims, which drew extended debate over whether the bill would limit lawsuits against lawful, regulated activities and whether it would preserve private nuisance and other existing remedies. Despite objections, the Senate suspended the rules and passed the bill to engrossment by a 17-12 vote, holding it there. Another debated measure was SB 1008 on state and local authority over the food service industry; after a perfecting amendment, it was passed to engrossment and then to final passage. Several bills were adopted or passed with near-unanimous support, while others, including SB 1267, SB 1470, SB 1822, and SB 2320, saw some opposition but still cleared the chamber.