Transcript Highlights:

• that were identified in the initial that were identified in the initial adoption<00:04:06.840>
• <00:14:53.560> special<00:14:53.880> education<00:14:54.920> evaluation initial
• special education evaluation initial special education evaluation this<00:14:56.160> evaluation
• <01:54:27.480> in paperwork reduction initiatives in paperwork reduction initiatives in recent
• asked it because I forgot in my initial asked it because I forgot in my initial um<02:00:47.320>

Keywords: 1187, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• , to do the very things you're talking about, but roll it forward five, six years, and it doesn't appear
• c><00:05:08.480> and<00:05:08.600> it<00:05:08.680> doesn't<00:05:08.960> appear
• <00:05:09.160> there's six years, and it doesn't appear there's six years, and it doesn't
• appear there's been<00:05:09.520> any<00:05:09.880> appreciable<00:05:10.600> improvement
• It was initially a five-year contract, and there's been one extension of that contract by the IFA.

Keywords: 958, all

Summary: The committee first approved the March 10 minutes and then moved through a large agenda of contract reviews, including a deferred Kentucky Transportation Cabinet item tied to Louisville bridge tolling and RiverLink. Transportation officials explained that the contract was part of a bi-state arrangement with Indiana: Indiana Finance Authority held the main contract with HNTB, while Kentucky needed a mirror contract to pay its 50% share under the bi-state management agreement. Members questioned why the work was treated as effectively no-bid, how much input Kentucky had in vendor selection, RiverLink’s collection performance, and when tolls might end. Transportation said Kentucky had equal representation in selection, HNTB served as a toll services advisor, collections and customer service had improved, and tolls are expected to remain until debt obligations are paid off in 2058. Several members criticized the company’s past performance and voted no as a statement of concern, but the contract still moved forward. The committee then deferred a Kentucky State University item because the vendor was not registered with the Secretary of State. It also approved the overall agenda and contract review lists. A Board of Optometric Examiners contract drew significant discussion: board representatives said they had previously relied on the Public Protection Cabinet for legal services, but that office lacked staff and advised them to seek outside counsel. Some members argued the committee could not approve a contract that appeared to conflict with statute, while others said the board should not be left without legal counsel and that the Attorney General should be brought in to resolve the issue. The committee ultimately voted to defer the optometric contract for one month and requested the Attorney General appear at the next meeting. Finally, the committee reviewed an Administrative Office of the Courts amendment for the Court of Appeals building project. Staff explained that the General Assembly had authorized the project, the design contract had already gone through multiple approved phases, and the current item was only an administrative correction to a prior modification amount. Members approved the amendment, with one member noting appreciation that the project costs had been reduced when an error was found.

Transcript Highlights:

• So that to me would look and appear to be some sort of a conflict of interest or a form of a kickback
• to be some sort of a a and appear to be some sort of a a conflict<00:27:04.760> of<00:27:04.880
• Grom, I think I got your name wrong initially, and then we'll try to get it right.
• Thank you to Representative Aam for carrying this initiative of the council to provide a little context
• Thank you to Representative Aam for carrying this initiative of the council to provide a little context

Bills: HF1379, HF1596, HF2260, HF1429

Keywords: nonopioid directive, opioid refusal, opioid-free care, pain management, health care directive, advance directive, patient autonomy, informed consent, substance use disorder, opioid epidemic, prescriber immunity, provider liability, emergency medical services, EMS, health record, Minnesota Department of Health, health care agent, medical power of attorney, Metropolitan Council, Minnesota government data practices

Transcript Highlights:

• The budget includes $45 million for targeted university initiatives, including investments to further
• The initial amount that we put into the budget was $1.5 billion, which is slightly down from last it
• And it appears we will do this rushed, without proper due diligence or thoughtfulness.
• I, in my glamorous self, would not be before you without such initiatives.
• I, in my glamorous self, would not be before you without such initiatives.

Keywords: 998, house, all

Transcript Highlights:

• Yes, the appropriation initially goes to the other department. Right.
• That is a conversation yet to be had about the expenses and the cost and how that would be initially
• It sounds like the goal would be to broaden it beyond the initial pilot communities as well.
• It sounds like the goal would be to broaden it beyond the initial pilot communities as well.
• So funding would be offered via a statewide block grant initially.

Summary: The subcommittee began by announcing a change in the agenda order, moving item 6 ahead of item 1 and then item 7, and noting there would be no votes taken on any items that day. Item 6 covered a proposed operational efficiencies control section for the Natural Resources Agency that would let multiple departments jointly fund landscape-scale or multi-jurisdictional projects and allow Finance to transfer climate bond funds to a lead state entity. The LAO said the proposal was reasonable but suggested the Legislature consider requiring summary notification on how it is used; Finance said it would consider that request. Item 7 focused on the 2026-27 biodiversity and nature-based solutions spending plan. Finance and the Wildlife Conservation Board described the climate bond funding for habitat restoration, wildlife crossings, public access, tribal nature-based solutions, and related work, including $111 million proposed for WCB and $30 million for Salton Sea habitat and public access projects. The LAO supported the overall approach but flagged the San Andreas Corridor Program as an area where the Legislature may want to specify geographic priorities. Members discussed the pace of Salton Sea work and whether the proposed projects would count toward disadvantaged community goals. Item 8 addressed Cal Fire’s aviation contract and staffing needs for wildfire response. Cal Fire said year-round fire activity, a larger and more complex aircraft fleet, and labor market pressures justified the proposed contract increase, including more mechanics, pilots, and maintenance support. The LAO recommended approval, saying the proposal addressed health and safety concerns. Members asked about contractor staffing, competition in the bidding process, and future technology for early fire detection and suppression. The committee then took up item 1 on golden mussel containment. Fish and Wildlife described the invasive species’ spread in the Delta, the task force and response framework, and a request for eight new positions funded by Prop. 4 to support control plans, outreach, monitoring, research, and coordination with partners and law enforcement. Members pressed the department on whether the state should fund more direct decontamination infrastructure and grants to local water managers, and on the realistic goal of containing the mussel. The chair and several members emphasized the urgency of the threat and requested an itemized breakdown of the $20 million request. The hearing then moved to a broader LAO overview of wildfire prevention and response funding, where the LAO summarized the state’s funding mix and warned that ongoing wildfire resilience funding will likely decline as one-time bond and GGRF funds are exhausted, prompting discussion of long-term funding options and the balance between prevention, suppression, and community hardening.

Transcript Highlights:

• The initial nine failed culverts took two years to be approved, and in the meantime, six more culverts
• But I really appreciate the fact that it appears that you're working cooperatively, and I hope you would
• The questioner replied that the issue appears in many fishermen's opposition letters and suggested the
• The initial portion of the investigation, we did believe that the individual The initial portion of the
• I am presenting this bill, which would create a marine carbon initiative in the state of California.

Summary: The committee heard a long agenda of water, parks, transportation, species protection, and fisheries bills. AB 430 would require the State Water Resources Control Board to publish an economic and environmental impact study when emergency water regulations are extended over multiple years; the author and supporters from agricultural and water groups said it would add transparency without limiting emergency authority. AB 1139 would expand a CEQA exemption to let county park agencies open existing roads and trails for non-motorized recreation, with supporters emphasizing access to nature and opponents warning about impacts to sensitive habitat, tribal resources, and fire risk. AB 929 would temporarily exempt small community water systems and managed wetlands from certain SGMA pumping reductions and fines; supporters said it would protect vulnerable communities and wetlands, while farm and water coalition opponents argued it would undermine basin-wide groundwater management and shift burdens to other users. AB 1225, creating an Accessibility Advisory Committee for State Parks, drew broad support and passed unanimously. The committee also heard AB 514, which would encourage local water suppliers to develop emergency water supplies for drought and service interruptions; it passed with broad support, though one member cautioned against using scientific research as a loophole. AB 550 would let developers seek incidental take permits for species under consideration for listing, aimed at reducing delays for clean energy projects; environmental groups supported the goal but asked for clearer standards, limits on using research as mitigation, and a fee provision, and the bill passed as amended. AB 697 would authorize an incidental take permit for the State Route 37 interim project in Solano and Marin counties, balancing congestion relief and habitat restoration; supporters stressed long commutes and urgent restoration deadlines, while opponents raised climate, sea-level-rise, and tribal concerns. The bill passed, with some members noting they would continue to work on the measure. Other measures discussed included AB 975, which would give Sutter County a narrow, temporary exemption from streambed alteration agreements for certain damaged small bridges and culverts; county officials described repeated flood damage and long permitting delays, and the bill passed as amended. AB 1056 would phase out transferability of set gillnet permits after 2027, allowing only a final family transfer; supporters framed it as a gradual response to bycatch concerns, while fishing industry opponents said it would unfairly target an existing fishery and set a bad precedent. The committee also took up AB 1146, described by the author as a response to politically motivated water releases; supporters from conservation and water organizations backed the bill. Several bills were voted out to Appropriations, some were left open for later action or add-ons, and the committee repeatedly noted it was working through the agenda without a quorum early in the hearing.

Transcript Highlights:

• under its provision, given the presumption that no conditions of release can be guaranteed at the appearance
• That is my fear of this bill and the whole initiative.
• So one thing I want you all to remember, it may have appeared like we were a split caucus, but let me
• help our state maximize our potential to meet our state's needs and would prevent other critical initiatives
• want to make sure that we're being as fiscally responsible with our budget when we carry out this initiative

Summary: The House convened with prayer, a moment of silence for the Parkland shooting victims, the Pledge of Allegiance, and adoption of the special order report for the day. The chamber then moved into a special-order agenda focused almost entirely on immigration-related measures, beginning with Senate Memorial 6C urging the U.S. Department of Homeland Security to provide guidance and training for 287(g) agreements. The memorial was adopted 85-27 after brief debate, with supporters arguing Florida should help maximize federal immigration enforcement and opponents saying Congress, not the state, should fix immigration policy. The House next took up Senate Bill 4C, an immigration bill creating new state offenses for illegal entry and reentry by adult unauthorized aliens and requiring a mandatory death sentence for an unauthorized alien convicted of a capital felony. Members debated constitutional concerns, due process, racial profiling, fiscal impacts, and whether the bill intruded on federal immigration authority. Several amendments were offered and defeated, including proposals to extend protections to Venezuelans with TPS, to remove the mandatory death penalty, to protect certain long-term immigrant workers and teachers, to expand exemptions for Haitians and humanitarian parole recipients, and to create a task force on best practices for immigration enforcement in schools and other sensitive locations. A final amendment to strip the bill as unconstitutional was also rejected. The bill then passed 85-29. The final measure discussed was Senate Bill 2C, which creates a State Board of Immigration Enforcement led by the Governor and Cabinet, establishes grants and incentive bonuses for local law enforcement cooperation with federal immigration authorities, repeals the fee waiver for undocumented students beginning July 1, 2025, and appropriates more than $300 million for immigration enforcement. The sponsor described it as a broad enforcement package, while questions from members focused on the impact on current students who receive in-state tuition and whether the bill would remove incentives for those already enrolled. The transcript ends during that exchange, before final action on SB 2C is shown.

Transcript Highlights:

• So, my question is, since you are part of a growing family and just based on appearances appear to be
• So, my question is, since you are part of a growing family and just based on appearances appear to be
• So, my question is, since you are part of a growing family and just based on appearances appear to be
• So, my question is, since you are part of a growing family and just based on appearances appear to be
• appear to and just based on appearances appear to be,<03:54:41.680> you<03:54:41.840> know

Keywords: 928, house, all

Summary: The committee heard public testimony on HB 1065, a housing bill that would clarify when multifamily and mixed-use housing may be allowed on commercially zoned land, define infrastructure standards, and preserve municipal discretion over where such development can occur. Prime sponsor Representative David Priest said the bill is intended to help address the housing shortage by using already developed commercial areas without overriding local planning. The New Hampshire Municipal Association, through Brody Dees, said it supports the bill and views it as a priority, but noted it is still discussing related language with stakeholders and wants clearer definitions for multifamily development, infrastructure, and adaptive reuse while preserving local control over commercial land use. Testimony was mixed. Ivy Van, a certified planner, opposed the bill because she said the infrastructure language is too restrictive and could exclude properties served by private utilities or septic systems. Chris Freeman, a housing provider, was generally supportive but recommended technical changes, arguing the infrastructure definition may be too broad and that the adaptive reuse language could unintentionally block useful building modifications. He said the bill should be clarified so it does not discourage reuse projects. The committee then moved to discussion of an accessory dwelling unit bill, with Representative Turkot describing changes that would shift some ADU approvals from a matter of right to conditional use or special exception, allow municipalities more control over attached versus detached units, set parking standards tied to single-family dwellings, and adjust size limits. He argued the bill would restore local discretion and prevent ADUs from becoming primarily rental units. Representative Reed pushed back, saying detached ADUs can help meet housing needs and provide opportunities for small landlords, while other members questioned how the bill would affect existing detached structures and breezeways. No votes were taken in the excerpt, and the chair also noted a recess and time limits for later testimony.

Transcript Highlights:

• find out they trace find out okay it was find out they trace find out okay it was this person that initiated
• the call they this person that initiated the call they this person that initiated the call they did
• the threat okay all right I initiated the threat okay all right I initiated the threat okay all right
• we're trying to go down the intentions we're trying to go down the same road but it just doesn't appear
• to same road but it just doesn't appear to same road but it just doesn't appear to be like we all on

Keywords: 1136, house, all

Transcript Highlights:

• Even if you leave it up to the rules of the Procurement Policy Board, based on that, it would appear
• Even if you leave it up to the rules of the Procurement Policy Board, based on that, it would appear
• Even if you leave it up to the rules of the Procurement Policy Board, based on that, it would appear
• that way it's not seen as a climate that way it's not seen as a climate change<00:56:26.400> initiative
• draw<00:56:28.559> down<00:56:28.920> some<00:56:29.119> of change initiative

Keywords: 910, house, all

Transcript Highlights:

• Blaise Duran, I'll call up as our representative on the Texas Pharmacy Initiative.
• I am Porter's designee on the advisory councils at the Texas Pharmaceutical Initiative.
• Although this is my first time appearing before you as CPRIT CEO, I have been with CPRIT from the very
• But the royalties that they are paying us initially range from 3% up to 5%.
• It appears to have been rescinded.

Summary: The Senate Finance Committee heard budget presentations for the Texas Historical Commission, the Pension Review Board, the Employees Retirement System (ERS), Social Security and benefit replacement pay, the Texas Emergency Services Retirement System (TESSRS), and the Cancer Prevention and Research Institute of Texas (CPRIT). The Legislative Budget Board outlined recommendations and major changes for each agency, including reductions tied to one-time projects at the Historical Commission, continued funding for courthouse grants, heritage trails, and Holocaust/genocide education, as well as new or modified riders and capital items. For the pension-related items, LBB described funding changes for PRB, ERS, Social Security, and TESSRS, including ERS health plan cost growth driven largely by pharmacy costs, the status of pension funding reforms, and TESSRS’s request for additional state support to address its unfunded liability and staffing needs. Members asked extensive questions about the Historical Commission’s one-time funding, unexpended balance authority, courthouse preservation, the Presidio La Bahia and National Museum of the Pacific War projects, and coordination of Texas history messaging across sites such as the Alamo, San Jacinto, Washington on the Brazos, and other heritage locations. The Historical Commission chair emphasized heritage tourism, economic development, and the need for continued investment in historic sites, staffing, IT modernization, and vehicles. On the pension items, senators discussed PRB oversight of local systems, including the Dallas police and fire pension situation, and ERS investment returns, benchmark comparisons, and rising health costs. ERS officials said the plan remains well funded overall, noted a 2021 cash balance reform and a planned supplemental legacy payment, and explained that GLP-1 drugs such as Ozempic and Mounjaro are a major driver of pharmacy spending; they also said the agency is working with the Texas Pharmacy Initiative and that rebates are contractually returned to ERS. For TESSRS, LBB and agency staff said the system serves volunteer and part-paid emergency personnel, is facing an infinite amortization period, and is requesting additional appropriations, staffing, and IT funding, along with a statutory change to allow an actuarially determined state contribution. The agency said it may otherwise need to cut benefits for volunteer firefighters. For CPRIT, LBB reported about $600 million in recommended funding for the biennium and a 10-FTE increase, while the agency described its $6 billion voter-approved program, $3.75 billion in grants awarded to date, and $10.4 million in revenue sharing since 2011. CPRIT’s only exceptional item was a request for a 10% salary increase for two exempt positions. No committee votes or formal actions were taken in the transcript.

Transcript Highlights:

• launch has to be a little that initial launch has to be a little bit<00:51:43.280> bigger<00:
• I do also think too that some of the requirements also appear quite restrictive.
• keep that in mind of folks who initially keep that in mind of folks who do<01:20:52.719> know
• <01:21:27.120> quite of the requirements uh also appear quite of the requirements uh also
• appear quite restrictive.<01:21:28.560> Um,<01:21:29.280> I<01:21:29.600> understand

Bills: HF3508, HF3548, HF3549

Keywords: dairy assistance, agriculture, investment, relief initiative, farm support, farm assistance, down payment, state funding, loan modification, grain indemnity, financial security, crop insurance, Minnesota agriculture, 1183, house

Transcript Highlights:

• So it’d be a $150 initial registration fee and then a renewal fee, and that’s it.
• And by comparison, I think the initial license fee for an insurance company is $1,500.
• So it'd be a $150<00:51:51.839> initial<00:51:52.319> registration<00:51:52.800> fee
• fee and then a $150 initial registration fee and then a renewal<00:51:53.839> fee<00:51:54.400
• <00:51:59.839> lensure comparison, I think the initial lensure comparison, I think the initial

Keywords: 1189, house, all

Summary: The subcommittee took up the pooled risk management program bill and reviewed a new amendment drafted with input from the Insurance Department and Legislative Services. Department witnesses explained that the proposal would move oversight of pooled risk management programs from the Secretary of State’s office to the Insurance Department, add a licensure requirement, preserve the programs’ non-insurer status, and exempt them from third-party administrator licensure. They also described a series of solvency tools in the draft, including financial reporting, risk-based capital standards, minimum capitalization, investment limits, commissioner examination and enforcement authority, rulemaking authority, merger and affiliate-transaction review, confidentiality protections, and a separability clause. A major theme of the discussion was that pooled risk management programs differ from commercial insurers because the risk remains with the member local governments rather than being backed by a state guarantee fund. Witnesses said the bill is designed to emphasize solvency over return of premium and to give the Insurance Department a regulatory “toolbox” to prevent insolvency, including a proposed $5 million excess or stop-loss coverage benchmark, optional accessible policies, and a requirement that boards vote on dividends or premium returns when capital exceeds 600% of risk-based capital. Members questioned how this approach differed from the original Secretary of State bill and whether assessments on towns would still be possible; the department responded that the new framework would allow more flexible oversight and alternatives to immediate court action. The committee also discussed why the statute should continue to say the programs are not insurers, with the department explaining that this preserves their autonomy and avoids applying unrelated insurance laws and premium taxes. Members asked about the department’s workload and were told the department believed it could absorb the new duties without additional funding. No vote or final committee action was taken in the portion provided.

Transcript Highlights:

• These articles appear the same as presented in committee earlier in the session.
• These articles appear the same as presented in committee earlier in the session.
• These articles appear the same as presented in committee earlier in the session.
• These articles appear the same as presented in committee earlier in the session.
• These articles appear technical article.

Keywords: 1187, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• initially into segregation. initially into segregation.
• after initial um sanction has<01:26:02.239> been<01:26:02.480> served.
• It's just in that initial 24-hour period. >> Got it. >> Yeah.
• It's just in that initial 24-hour >> Yeah.
• It's just in that initial 24-hour period. period. period. >> Got<01:51:51.440> it.

Keywords: 912, senate, all

Summary: The working group on restrictive housing met with a quorum present, approved the August 21, 2025 minutes, and adopted a procedure to take public testimony on each agenda item with a two-minute limit per testifier, with some flexibility for follow-up questions. The main presentation came from the Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation on restrictive housing policies and a recent outside assessment of mental health care practices at HSCF and OOTC. DCR said the assessment found strengths such as consistent medication administration and staff commitment, but also identified major problems including outdated workflows, staffing shortages, inadequate physical plant conditions, overuse of suicide/safety watch for personal safety issues, and a need for more individualized treatment plans. DCR described several corrective steps already underway: filling a long-vacant high-level mental health administrator position, adjusting evening medication passes, working with DOH on transfer and referral workflows, planning a new electronic medical records system and revised screening tools, and pursuing additional training for ACOs and mental health staff. For OOTC, DCR said the facility is overcrowded and decrepit, needs a better screening tool, and requires more mental health-specific training and staffing. For HCF, DCR said the layout limits confidential assessments and provider access, and that the proposed consolidated healthcare unit would add 43 beds, private exam rooms, and a de-escalation room. DCR also said the new unit could serve acute and chronic suicide/safety watch needs and possibly some inmates with dementia, Alzheimer’s, or significant cognitive impairment. The discussion then focused on Act 292, which DCR said is difficult to implement as written. DCR said the bill aligns with DOJ, NCCHC, and ACA guidance in defining restrictive housing, limiting duration, requiring reviews, identifying vulnerable populations, and using step-down units, but raised two major concerns: a requirement to refer vulnerable people to DOH for confinement, and a requirement for clinical assessments every 12 hours by a provider. Members responded that the law should be matched with funding and staffing, and asked what resources are needed. DCR said it submitted a request for 35 positions at a cost of about $8.6 million, and also said funding may be needed for community-based beds and contracted medical services. Members also asked about the current MOA/MOU between DOH and DCR, the working group membership, and the timeline for revisions. DCR said the group includes DCR, DOH, and governor’s office medical advisors, that a first draft is complete, and that the revised agreement should be in place by the end of the year. On staffing, DCR said ACO recruitment classes increased from five to eight, vacancy rates dropped from 34% to 24%, but OOTC still faces a projected $7.1 million shortfall and heavy overtime costs, forcing post closures and program reductions. The meeting ended with continued discussion of screening tools, including DCR’s explanation that current broad questions may over-identify people with substance-use-related symptoms as having serious mental illness, and that a more discrete tool is needed to better identify those with acute needs.

Transcript Highlights:

• Just like on the resolution, if you don't respond right away, your name may not appear directly there
• And the only reason for that treatment appears to be the color of our skin.
• Is it because there is a hope that these initial gifts, grants, and donations will come in and act as
• So while there is that initial payment, yes, it is... That doesn't happen with workman's comp.
• And I saw what appeared to be at the time a legal path for an argument.

Keywords: 981, all

Transcript Highlights:

• Is the Chair's intention to complete these initial hearings?
• It appears to be making two points here.
• That's intentional racial discrimination, or at least it strongly appears to be.
• In fact, for these initial hearings, we're only having three total hearings for a state of 30 million
• Since there were going to be three initial hearings on any revisions to the plan, I divided the state

Keywords: 997, house, all

Transcript Highlights:

• for their injury through a plaintiff attorney, and you said something very pertinent during your initial
• It's an honor to appear in front of this committee. And, frankly, an honor to appear next to Mr.
• The other vehicle initially refused medical treatment until her husband arrived at the scene.
• In March of 2023, our insurance company sent us a letter advising us that this case appears to be so
• Yes, sir, but it appears that the adversarial risk for the defendant is enormous and the adversarial

Bills: SB 30, SB 517, SB 1313, SB 1314, SB 1316, SB 1541, SB 1698, SB 1845, SB 1860, SB 2420, SB 2429

Keywords: gambling, criminal offenses, penalties, defense, electronic devices, tobacco advertising, youth protection, public health, criminal offense, retailer regulation, e-cigarettes, nicotine products, health, public safety, regulation, advertising restrictions, health and safety, elections, election audit, county elections

Summary: The Senate Committee on State Affairs convened to discuss several critical pieces of legislation including SB30 and SB38. Senator Betancourt introduced a committee substitute for SB38 which underwent a smooth adoption process, moving it favorably toward the Senate. The meeting featured a mix of invited testimonies where both proponents and opponents took the floor. One notable highlight included a testimony from Melissa Casey, who criticized the current legal state as prone to fraud and detrimental to both insurers and the public at large, contending that it inflated insurance costs across the board. The discussions delved deeply into the implications of the bills on judicial processes and potential insurance ramifications, with spirited debates surrounding issues of non-economic damages and jury rights. The atmosphere remained engaged as committee members heard varied perspectives on the bills, showcasing a robust democratic process. The meeting underscored the importance of public testimony in shaping legislation, ensuring that multiple voices were considered as the committee pressed on towards making decisions that affect the legal landscape of Texas.

Transcript Highlights:

• The ayes appear to have it. The ayes do have it.
• the bill be amended as it appears the bill be amended as it appears starting<01:31:56.960> on
• that the bill be amended as it appears that the bill be amended as it appears on<01:43:54.400>
• The eyes appear to have it.
• The eyes do >> The eyes appear to have it.

Keywords: 927, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• I direct the doctor of audiology program at the University of Utah, but I am appearing here as a private
• If you look at 2071, there is now, and this goes against, I think, our initial recommendation, but there
• Not sure why that was carved out initially. I wasn't there for that part of the conversation.
• first item is, does not have the requirement to verify proof of age in restaurants if the person appears
• else's driver's license ID that's valid and then contact me and say, why does your picture keep appearing

Keywords: 985, all