Transcript Highlights:

• And same with if you're in the program in an apartment building, you can smoke it.
• And same with if you're in the program in an apartment building, you can smoke it.
• Is that a criminal code then?
• Is that a criminal<01:02:21.280><c> code</c><01:02:21.520><c> then?
• Is it a criminal criminal code then?

Bills: HF2354 , HF1672 , HF2389 , HF2870 , HF2743 , HF1918 , HF2551 , HF1671

Committee: House Judiciary Finance and Civil Law

Keywords: medical assistance, fraud prevention, subpoena authority, criminal penalties, consumer protection, medical cannabis, medical marijuana, cannabis, cannabinoids, hemp, marijuana registry, patient registry, visiting patient, Tribal cannabis, Tribal medical cannabis program, Tribal sovereignty, Office of Cannabis Management, designated caregiver, home cultivation, adult-use cannabis

Transcript Highlights:

• Co-ops are not really an issue in most of California... ...not really an issue in most of California,
• Can they be inside objective standards? Or are there no objective standards at all, perhaps?
• I want to also add that currently California is in the bottom half of fiber build-out in the country.
• This is not unique to California.
• California Utility Employees.

Committee: Senate Energy, Utilities and Communications

Summary: The Senate Committee on Energy, Utilities and Communications held an oversight hearing focused on electric rates, utility regulation, affordability, wildfire costs, and the California Public Utilities Commission’s role. Chair and members framed the discussion around the challenge of transitioning to a cleaner grid while maintaining reliability and keeping bills affordable. The hearing also served as the annual update from the CPUC and the Public Advocates Office, with testimony from Professor Severin Borenstein and CPUC President-designate Alice Reynolds. Borenstein gave a primer on utility regulation, explaining that generation is largely deregulated while transmission and distribution remain regulated, and that most rate-setting follows cost-of-service regulation. He emphasized that the hardest issue is setting the allowed return on equity: too high can raise bills and encourage capital-heavy spending, while too low can deter investment and harm reliability. He argued there is no silver bullet, said performance-based regulation and price caps have limits, and suggested some costs now charged through electric bills—such as climate programs, low-income subsidies, and wildfire-related public policy costs—might more appropriately be paid through the state budget. Reynolds described the CPUC’s oversight role, saying the commission reviews utility spending through general rate cases, balancing accounts, and other proceedings, and that affordability is addressed through front-end scrutiny, post-spend accountability, and legislative direction. She highlighted wildfire mitigation as a major driver of rate increases, noted recent progress on clean energy procurement and battery storage, and said the CPUC is working on return-on-equity decisions, FERC advocacy on transmission costs, and implementation of SB 254 and other statutes. Members pressed on a range of issues, including wildfire securitization, load growth from EVs and data centers, gas-system stranded assets, balancing accounts, and a water-service dispute in Keene involving Union Pacific. No votes were taken; the hearing was informational, with several follow-up commitments from the CPUC to provide data and updates.

Transcript Highlights:

• Co-ops are not really an issue in most of what California, in most of California... ...not really an
• issue in most of what California, in most of California, but municipal utilities are, and they have a
• Can they be inside objective standards? Or are there no objective standards at all, perhaps?
• I also want to add that currently California is in the bottom half of fiber build-out in the country.
• California Utility Employees.

Committee: Senate Energy, Utilities and Communications

Transcript Highlights:

• standard.
• that standard was a civil negligence standard, correct?
• that standard was a civil negligence standard, correct?
• So during committee, that standard, I said, was it a civil negligence standard?
• In addition, medical providers have made repeated statements in this building that there are standards

Summary: The House convened with prayer, the Pledge of Allegiance, approval of the prior day’s journal, and a long series of special guest introductions recognizing interns, community leaders, FFA officers, library advocates, park and recreation professionals, and others. Members also used points of personal privilege to honor Black History Month and the legacy of William Clay Sr. The chamber then moved into first reading of several bills, including measures on University of Missouri curators, personal property assessment lists, and state department spending. The main floor action centered on House Bill 1757, which would require universal screening of third-graders for gifted education using flexible screening methods and would help ensure students who qualify are identified regardless of zip code or family resources. Supporters argued the bill would close gaps in gifted identification and expand access, while questions focused on funding, screening methods, and whether the bill would create an unfunded mandate. The House adopted the committee substitute and ordered the bill perfected and printed. Members then debated the Born Alive Abortion Survivors Protection Act, presented as House Committee Substitute for House Bills 1667 and 2294. Supporters said the bill would require medical care for infants who survive an abortion attempt and impose civil and criminal penalties for knowingly harming such a child. Opponents argued the bill was duplicative of existing law, could criminalize medical providers, and would worsen Missouri’s maternal care shortages. The debate included extended questioning about the bill’s standards, scope, and enforcement, but no final vote on the born-alive measure was taken in the excerpt.

Transcript Highlights:

• Americans strongly feel that the tax code is built in favor of the wealthy.
• TCJA addressed some of the more egregious problems that existed in the tax code until 2017.
• And they can instead take that standard deduction.
• But I believe a tax code that benefits our small businesses is a tax code that pays also for the essential
• You also testified to the need to close a series of loopholes. in our tax code.

Committee: Senate Small Business and Entrepreneurship Committee

Keywords: joint hearing, small business, Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, economic recovery, tax relief, job creation

Summary: In this joint hearing of the House Committee on Small Business and the Senate Committee on Small Business and Entrepreneurship, the primary focus was on the importance of making the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017 (TCJA) permanent. The chair emphasized that small businesses are crucial for the nation's economic recovery, especially in the wake of current federal policies perceived as detrimental. Witnesses shared their experiences and highlighted how the tax cuts facilitated job creation and business expansion, stressing the need for continued support through ongoing tax relief measures. The meeting included discussions about the economic implications of the TCJA's potential expiration, with members voicing their concerns regarding how this could impact small businesses and the broader economy.

Transcript Highlights:

• I want to make that clear, not program building, institution building, so that we can make sure that
• First, building a healthy California for all.
• First, building a healthy California for all.
• This funding has directly enabled the NAACP California Hawaii State Conference to build...
• This funding has directly enabled the NAACP California Hawaii State Conference to build and expand a

Transcript Highlights:

• So I think there's Code Ninjas. My sons go to that.
• They go and they code at a computer in a building in a strip mall for a while, and then they go home.
• I would say this is setting a standard.
• in a government building, then the government building can take the appropriate course to direct that
• The process of V-coding is, while not... Yes.

Committees: House Emerging Issues , House Emerging Issues and Professional Registration

Transcript Highlights:

• Sir Duket, on behalf of the Rural County Representatives of California and the California Association
• of Code Enforcement Officers, in support.
• With me to testify in support is Silvio Ferrari on behalf of the California Building Industry Association
• Sylvia Farrow, on behalf of the California Building Industry Association, proud sponsors of the bill.
• , and Habitat for Humanity California, all in strong support.

Summary: The committee opened the June 18, 2025 Local Government hearing with housekeeping rules, noting that testimony would be in person and that disruptive conduct would not be tolerated. Because a quorum was initially lacking, the committee proceeded as a subcommittee and heard several bills before later taking formal votes once quorum was established. The agenda included 15 bills, with eight placed on the consent calendar and one bill pulled by the author. The bills discussed included SB 333, which would let San Luis Obispo County voters consider raising the local sales tax cap for transportation funding; SB 390, a district-specific measure for South San Francisco to address a Mello-Roos/CFD issue affecting properties with conservation easements; SB 394, which would increase penalties for water theft and allow local agencies to recover damages; SB 611, which would restore protections for housing projects tied to adopted community plans while CEQA litigation is pending; SB 757, which would allow nuisance abatement liens or special assessments to collect cleanup costs for chronic nuisance properties; and SB 489, which would require public agencies involved in housing approvals to post application requirements online. Supporters generally framed the bills as tools for infrastructure financing, housing production, transparency, public safety, or deterrence of theft and blight. Opposition was heard on SB 757, with critics warning about due process, foreclosure risk, and displacement of low-income homeowners. After quorum was called, the committee voted 7-0 to pass SB 757, and later approved SB 489 on a 10-0 vote. The consent calendar bills—SB 74, SB 225, SB 272, SB 409, SB 558, SB 735, SB 736, and SB 737—were approved together. SB 333 advanced on a 7-2 vote, SB 390 passed 9-0, SB 394 passed 9-0, and SB 611 passed 10-0. The hearing concluded with the committee adjourned after all listed actions were taken.

Transcript Highlights:

• clear standardized regulatory guidelines.
• In serious consideration by this legislature to build more and more beds.
• In CAPERS, we have have 30 standards to live by to ensure the fidelity and safety within.
• So peer organizations build the recovery capital.
• If you build it, they will deliver them, which is a plan. If you build it, they will come.

Bills: HB3772 , HB1656 , HB4504 , HB1896 , HB4420 , HB4421 , HB4076 , HB3708 , HB2806 , HB3540 , HB1586 , HB5459 , HB4553 , HB4535 , HB3811 , HB3749 , HB4255 , HB4051 , HB5098 , HB3554 , HB4539 , HB5274

Committee: House Public Health

Keywords: e-cigarettes, health and safety, regulations, directory, penalties, regulation, certification, compliance, manufacturers, FDA, nicotine, mental health, emergency detention, paramedic authority, mental illness, healthcare facility, public health, covenants not to compete, health care practitioners, physicians

Transcript Highlights:

• I'm with the California Transit Association in support. Thank you.
• Good afternoon, Mark Newberger, for the California State Association of Counties in support.
• Rob Gross-Clouser, on behalf of the California Assessors Association.
• Amy Garrett with the California Association of Realtors, in strong support of the measure.
• According to the California Association of Food Banks, 22% of California households and 20% of... ...

Committee: House Revenue and Taxation

Summary: The Assembly Revenue and Taxation Committee met after several delays while the Senate remained in session. Once convened, the chair welcomed new committee member Assembly Member Juan Carrillo and explained hearing procedures, including that bills with significant fiscal impacts would generally be sent to suspense. SB 87 was the only bill designated for an immediate vote; the rest were heard for discussion and then referred to suspense. The committee heard several tax-related measures. SB 359 would clarify that county-run transit systems qualify for existing fuel tax exemptions for public transit operators; it drew support from the County of Placer, the California Transit Association, and CSAC, and was sent to suspense. SB 603 would allow county boards in disaster-affected counties to extend the five-year replacement property deadline by up to three years; it was supported by the Assessors Association and the California Association of Realtors and also sent to suspense. SB 293 would extend deadlines and protect intergenerational property transfers for disaster-impacted homeowners, especially in Altadena after the Eaton Fire; it received strong support from the California Community Foundation and committee members, and was referred to suspense after the author agreed to work on refinements. The committee also heard SB 353, which would extend the farm-to-food-bank tax credit for five more years; it was supported by Californians Against Waste and sent to suspense. SB 723 would raise the threshold for local property tax exemptions on low-value properties to reduce administrative burden on small businesses, and was likewise referred to suspense. SB 785 would create a $5,000 tax credit for durable medical equipment for medically fragile children; it drew support from pediatric home health and provider groups and was sent to suspense. SB 87, which would extend the sales tax exemption for volunteer fire department fundraising activities, was the only bill voted on and passed the committee 5-0 to Appropriations.

Transcript Highlights:

• So NAMI California is the National Alliance on Mental Illness in California.
• So really delighted to announce that now in California, So really delighted to announce that now in California
• well as the California State University and the University of California Office of the President.
• The First Partner's Office, alongside California Volunteers and the California Health and Human Services
• Agency, have launched this campaign called California Love, California Strong, with the idea of really

Summary: The Select Committee on Youth Mental Health and Treatment Access held its third hearing to review the state of youth mental health, progress under the Children and Youth Behavioral Health Initiative (CYBHI), and remaining implementation and funding challenges. The chair emphasized that schools are often the main point where education, health care, and social services intersect for students, and that the committee’s goal is to ensure public investments translate into better access and outcomes. The hearing featured testimony from researchers, a youth advocate, state officials, and local practitioners. PPIC researcher Shalini Mostala reported that teen mental health remains a serious concern, with high rates of chronic sadness, hopelessness, and suicidal thoughts, though recent California data show some improvement since the pandemic. She noted persistent disparities by gender, race, and rural status, and said school-based health centers, wellness centers, and community schools are associated with lower suicidal thoughts. Youth advocate Ella Cruz, speaking for NAMI California, described her own mental health struggles and argued that youth voice, peer-to-peer support, and reducing stigma are essential; she also said technology and AI cannot replace trusted adults or trained professionals. Committee members asked about phone use, stigma, cultural barriers, and how to make supports more accessible and relatable to students. Dr. Sohill Sood of the California Health and Human Services Agency said statewide survey data show declining stigma, increased counseling use, and lower suicide ideation among students, and he highlighted CYBHI’s certified wellness coaches, digital tools, awareness campaigns, and the first-in-the-nation fee schedule that allows schools and colleges to bill health plans for behavioral health services. He said the program is growing quickly, with more than 230,000 claims and over $11 million in new revenue to date, while acknowledging that billing systems and coordination are still being built. Trina Frazier of Fresno County described a multi-tiered system of care supported by CYBHI, CalAIM, and other grants, serving thousands of students through school-based services, wellness centers, and mobile therapy units; she said ongoing funding and flexibility are critical. Rachel Kroberniski of El Segundo High School’s James Morehouse Project described a long-running wellness center and peer mentorship model that supports students in multiple languages, and said peer programs help students feel seen, connected, and more willing to seek help. Members broadly praised the flexibility, collaboration, and peer-based approaches described by the witnesses. Questions focused on sustaining funding after one-time grants expire, improving coordination among schools, counties, and providers, expanding the fee schedule to higher education, and ensuring continuity of care for students after high school. Officials said county offices of education, DHCS, and other partners are using communities of practice and technical assistance to spread best practices, and that CYBHI services can follow some young adults through age 25, with additional supports through community-based programs and digital platforms.

Transcript Highlights:

• We already have a process for confirming residency in the code.
• style building, you have columns from the Roman.
• Okay, you enter your access code here, you put your paper in right there.
• Texas election code 122.001 clearly states that voting must be private.
• All are understanding section 122.001 in the voting code.

Bills: SB16 , SB76 , SB310 , SB311 , SB396 , SB505 , SB827 , SB964 , SB1209 , SB1210 , SB1386 , SB1470 , SB2035 , SJR37 , SB 16

Committee: Senate State Affairs

Transcript Highlights:

• of California to unionize.
• They keep our buildings looking great and freshly painted.
• Sandra Brewer with SEIU California in support. Sandra Brewer with SEIU California in support.
• Association and the California.
• Eric Lairn, on behalf of the California State Association of Counties, the Urban Counties of California

Summary: The Assembly Committee on Public Employment and Retirement heard several labor and retirement bills. AB 1582 by Assembly Member Ortega would make it an unfair labor practice for a higher education employer to disregard or delay arbitration decisions involving contracting out, with make-whole relief including attorney fees and costs. Supporters from AFSCME and other labor groups said UC has repeatedly ignored arbitration outcomes on outsourcing disputes, while UC opposed the bill as an overbroad change that could create systemwide operational and financial risk. The committee passed the bill on a do-pass basis to Appropriations. AB 1818 by Assembly Member Ortega would repeal an outdated HEERA provision that CSU has used to reopen bargaining when it claims state funding is insufficient. Teamsters and other labor supporters argued CSU has used the provision to avoid honoring negotiated raises, while CSU said the bill would limit its ability to manage compensation responsibly when state funding is uncertain. The committee also passed AB 1818 to Appropriations. AB 1564 by Assembly Member Arreguín would make communications between an employee and union representative confidential in public employment matters. Labor supporters said the measure would protect trust in the representational relationship and codify existing PERB case law, while school, local government, county, city, and business groups warned it could hinder workplace investigations, including those involving student safety and harassment. The bill passed 7-0 to Appropriations. AB 1844 by Assembly Member Pacheco, placed on the consent calendar, would update Judges’ Retirement System 2 to allow non-spouse beneficiaries for survivor benefits and to extend access to survivor options for vested judges; it was approved unanimously, 7-0. After all items were taken up, the committee adjourned.

Transcript Highlights:

• build.
• And then once that you get your building permit, you start the building process, and you know how that
• goes, and we hope that that building process can expedite along because building being very sequential
• the city's standards to meet what the city's current standards are, but they've been in place.
• And so, the larger if you're building a master plan community that may be a 20-year build out in 10 phases

Committee: House Land & Resource Management

Transcript Highlights:

• And so this is building on existing registries that we have.
• I just want to say not just California, too.
• California, which has a registry as well, has 566.
• California but not in Vermont. So, that California but not in Vermont.
• <01:04:59.160><c> is</c><01:04:59.360><c> across-the-aisle</c> building is across-the-aisle building

Transcript Highlights:

• California, in support.
• California, in support.
• California, in support.
• As a California resident, I think California should pull the plug.
• all of California.

Summary: The Senate Committee on Transportation heard testimony on a large agenda of transportation-related bills, with several measures discussed before a quorum was established. AB 1588 focused on sideshows and street takeovers, with the author, San Francisco Police Department, and Streets Are for Everyone arguing the bill would modernize enforcement, add motorbikes and dirt bikes to the sideshow framework, and improve public safety; there was no opposition testimony. AB 2015 would require Caltrans to study the effects of third-party navigation apps on congestion, local streets, infrastructure, and emergency response, and was supported by Streets for All, AAA, and local agencies, with no opposition. AB 2717 would extend a sunset for off-site advertising displays at large sports venues; the Dodgers supported it, the San Jose Sharks and others noted amendments, and no opposition was heard. AB 1608 would strengthen the independence and transparency of the High-Speed Rail Office of Inspector General by requiring public reports, adding confidentiality protections for sensitive security information, and granting staffing and purchasing authority; the First Amendment Coalition supported the amended bill, while the Vice Chair raised concerns about transparency and limiting confidential notices to committee chairs. The committee also heard AB 2346 on e-bike safety, which would require speedometers on Class 2 e-bikes, lights, a statewide sidewalk speed limit, local authority over bike-path speeds, and point-of-sale disclosures. Support came from medical, law enforcement, local government, and safety groups citing rising injuries and confusion over e-bike rules; PeopleForBikes remained opposed unless amended, mainly over lighting and disclosure requirements, though Streets for All withdrew its opposition after amendments. Members broadly supported the bill and discussed helmet use, youth safety, and the distinction between e-bikes and higher-powered e-motos. AB 1919 would let Santa Cruz Metro place a citizens’ initiative on the ballot to secure transit funding and protect service and jobs; the sponsor, bus operators, and labor supported it, with no opposition testimony. AB 2012 would streamline permits for moving manufactured homes under an annual permit, and AB 2024 would clarify Outdoor Advertising Act permitting and relocation procedures; both drew support from industry and housing groups and no opposition. After quorum was established, the committee adopted the consent calendar, which included items 13, 6, 8, 11, 14, 15, and 21, by roll call vote. The committee then heard AB 2484, which would allow San Diego voters to authorize a local transit tax initiative for MTS; the author and MTS argued it would preserve service and allow voters to decide future funding, and the bill advanced on a 5-2 roll call with the roll left open for absent members. The committee also heard AB 2560, which would codify the state transportation climate principles known as CAPTI; supporters said it would lock in goals for transit, rail, active transportation, equity, and greenhouse gas reduction, while Orange County Transportation Authority opposed. The author closed by asking for aye votes, and the committee proceeded toward roll-call action on the bill.

Transcript Highlights:

• the California Military Department?
• First of all, California has recognized that veterans or citizens of the state, and as California has
• But we could build the most beautiful buildings.
• California.
• is building upon our progress.

Committee: House Military and Veterans Affairs

Summary: The Assembly Committee on Military and Veterans Affairs held an informational hearing focused on the effects of federal budget and staffing cuts on veterans and on California’s systems for delivering veteran services. In opening remarks, the chair argued that cuts to the VA, federal workforce, Medi-Cal, SNAP/CalFresh, and related programs would disproportionately harm veterans, citing impacts on health care, suicide prevention, housing, and employment. The committee then heard from the California Military Department, CalVet, county veteran service offices, and veterans legal and housing organizations about how state and local programs are responding. Major General Matthew Beavers of the California Military Department described the department’s structure, its response to the Los Angeles fire emergency, and concerns that federal cuts could reduce readiness, training, equipment, and funding for programs such as Work for Warriors, STARBASE, and counterdrug operations. Members asked about how service members access VA benefits, the impact of federal cuts on readiness, and what the Legislature can do to help. Beavers said the state should advocate for recapitalized equipment and stable funding, and he criticized some federal efficiency reviews as wasteful while warning that reduced readiness would ultimately affect Californians. CalVet Deputy Secretary Roberto Herrera, L.A. County veteran services director Jim Zenner, and Swords to Plowshares legal director Mo Cedar emphasized that county veteran service officers and legal aid are essential for claims, appeals, housing, and mental health access. They said the PACT Act and federal staffing strains have increased demand, while county offices remain underfunded. Testimony highlighted the value of CalVet strike teams, MHSA-funded legal services, and county programs that bring in federal benefits and reduce homelessness and incarceration costs. Committee members generally agreed that California should sustain and expand these supports, improve data sharing, and protect state programs from federal cuts. In the final panel on mental health and suicide prevention, Herrera, Amy Fairweather of Swords to Plowshares, and Robert Storr of U.S. Vets described state-funded programs such as the Veterans Support Self-Reliance program and the California Veterans Health Initiative. They reported improved outcomes for veterans in supportive housing and expanded no-cost counseling statewide, but warned that step-down funding and federal uncertainty could jeopardize services. Members asked about wait times, access, and who can use VA services, and witnesses explained that the main barriers are workforce shortages and capacity, not just eligibility. No formal votes or legislative actions were taken during the hearing.

Transcript Highlights:

• them for building a building or occupying a building down here would you say so I don't have the the
• You know, if you were to, you know, build a building there or lease a building there.
• I'll verify the codes.
• And it's all I see in the codes, so is there a code for this for the merit?
• And so, uh, tax code, the Texas tax code generally covers how districts set their INS rates.

Committee: House Delivery of Government Efficiency

Transcript Highlights:

• the California Military Department?
• And code talkers and others.
• First of all, California has recognized that veterans or citizens of the state, and as California has
• the most beautiful buildings.
• is building upon our progress.

Summary: The Assembly Committee on Military and Veteran Affairs held an informational hearing focused on the effects of federal budget cuts and policy changes on veterans, military readiness, and California’s veteran support systems. The chair and members emphasized that federal reductions to the VA, Medicaid/Medi-Cal, SNAP, and the federal workforce are disproportionately harming veterans by threatening health care, employment, housing, crisis lines, and suicide prevention services. The chair also highlighted California’s progress on veteran homelessness and the importance of preserving state programs that leverage federal dollars. Major General Matthew Beavers of the California Military Department described the department’s structure, its response to the Los Angeles fire emergency, and concerns that federal cuts could reduce readiness through less training, older equipment, and fewer resources. He also discussed state programs such as Work for Warriors, STARBASE, youth and community schools, and the counterdrug task force, saying they are valuable but vulnerable if funding is redirected away from readiness. Members asked about the impact of federal changes on the Guard and how the Legislature could help, and Beavers said the state should advocate for recapitalized equipment and continued support for key programs. A second panel focused on veterans’ benefits and claims support. CalVet, Los Angeles County, and Swords to Plowshares testified that county veteran service officers, legal aid, and community-based partnerships are essential to helping veterans access VA benefits, especially after the PACT Act expanded eligibility and increased claims volume. Witnesses said these services bring substantial federal dollars back to California, but county offices and legal providers are underfunded and overburdened. Members discussed data sharing, staffing shortages, and the need for more resources to reach veterans who are not connected to VA care. In the final panel on mental health and suicide prevention, CalVet and nonprofit providers described state-funded programs such as the Veterans Support Self-Reliance program and the California Veterans Health Initiative, which place services in permanent supportive housing and provide no-cost counseling statewide. Witnesses said these programs are showing measurable improvements in health, medication adherence, and emergency room use, but they depend on sustained funding and are vulnerable to step-down grants and federal instability. Committee members expressed support for the programs and raised questions about access, staffing, and the role of non-veteran family members in Vet Center services.

Transcript Highlights:

• Jessica Dwan, from the University of California, is here in opposition. Thank you.
• Jessica Dwan, from the University of California, in opposition. I'll just say briefly.
• At the same time, I, you know, I also received a copy of the Jewish California letter.
• And we also, the Jewish California groups moved their opposition to neutral. Okay.
• Quote, the trustees of California State University, that I'm reading from Government Code section that

Summary: The Assembly Higher Education Committee heard AB 2551 by Assemblymember Sade Elhawary, which would require the California State University system to hold a student hearing on time, place, and manner (TPM) policies and to collect and report demographic data on TPM violations and related discipline. The author and student witnesses argued the bill would increase transparency, reveal disproportionate enforcement, and give students a voice, citing examples of students facing investigations, holds on records, and other consequences after campus protests. Supporters included the California Faculty Association, CAIR-California, and ACLU California Action. The University of California opposed the bill, raising privacy concerns that disaggregated reporting could make it easier to identify individual students, especially in small categories. Committee members debated whether the bill was too prescriptive, whether it could create federal privacy issues, and whether the reporting should include additional categories such as political viewpoint. The author said the bill had been narrowed, including removal of a sunset provision, and emphasized that the goal was to understand and address possible disproportionate enforcement while balancing student safety and free speech. After discussion, the committee voted to concur in Senate amendments and pass AB 2551 to the floor. The roll call ultimately showed 8 ayes, 1 no, and 1 not voting. The chair then announced the committee’s final meeting of the year was adjourned.