Transcript Highlights:

• The other element I want to point out there is there's not a direct correlation between entrance fee
• You could pay a high entrance fee and have 4,000 square feet of living space.
• In most cases, the CCRC entrance fee model was developed to create a cost of construction, and that's
• of the entrance fee model, like I said earlier, is utilized to offset the costs of construction.
• You're probably sick of hearing me say that, and entrance fees.

Keywords: 995, all

Summary: The Special Commission on Continuing Care Retirement Communities met for its third meeting, focused on regulations, oversight, and enforcement. Staff and agency presenters reviewed the current framework: the Executive Office of Aging and Independence explained that assisted living regulations generally do not apply to CCRCs unless an assisted living component markets itself separately, and that CCRCs must submit marketing materials, contracts, and disclosure statements for public posting. The Attorney General’s office described Chapter 93A consumer protection standards and noted it is working on draft assisted living-specific regulations. DPH outlined its oversight of licensed nursing facilities associated with some CCRCs, including routine surveys, complaint investigations, and enforcement tools such as admissions freezes, fines, receivership, and license actions, along with federal CMS sanctions for certified facilities. Commission members and presenters then discussed gaps and ambiguities in how CCRCs are defined and regulated, especially whether communities without on-site skilled nursing should still be treated as CCRCs, how assisted living-like services within CCRCs are classified, and whether residents have enough clarity about the services they are buying. A major theme was disclosure: members raised concerns about entrance fees, refund timing and conditions, whether skilled nursing is on-site or provided by contract, and how residents can compare communities. Several participants suggested more standardized disclosure and possibly broader consumer protection rules, while others cautioned that overly rigid requirements could affect community finances and development. The commission also explored enforcement and resident protections. Some members argued that independent living residents are already covered by landlord-tenant law and that existing complaint systems and community education may be sufficient, while others said residents in supported or assisted settings within CCRCs should have clearer access to ombudsman services and oversight. The discussion turned to closure and ownership transfer, with members citing recent national examples of sales and bankruptcies that changed resident terms. DPH explained its closure process for licensed nursing facilities, and members noted that Chapter 197 of 2024 adds oversight for facility transfers and financial disclosures. The meeting ended with logistics for the next session at Brookhaven at Lexington on June 2, a public hearing on June 16, and a request to circulate the hearing notice broadly to residents and stakeholder organizations.

Transcript Highlights:

• The proposed $493 licensing fee for speech language pathology assistants, or SLPAs, is more than double
• the supervision requirements while also seeking a cost estimate to reduce the assistant licensing fees
• The proposed $493 licensing fee for speech language pathology assistants, or SLPAs, is more than double
• the supervision requirements while also seeking a cost estimate to reduce the assistant licensing fees
• The proposed $493 licensing fee for speech language pathology assistants, or SLPAs, is more than double

Keywords: 1187, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• $225 annual fee. $225 annual fee. In<00:33:28.920> St.
• annually it's a $97 individual fee. annually it's a $97 individual fee.
• In Brooklyn Center, there's an annual establishment fee of $3,000 and a $1,500 investigation fee.
• In every development.
• Mandatory tree fees, mandatory park fees, in addition to building a park.

Keywords: 1187, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• Development. Development.
• Committee on Economic Development. Committee on Economic Development.
• here here in Senate Economic Development here here in Senate Economic Development Housing<00:35:
• convenience fee? convenience fee?
• the committee on economic development. the committee on economic development.

Keywords: 927, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• for 19 FTEs and the criminal Investigations Division and then item five is a new rider for contingent fee
• untracked payments that would allow the agency to pay contingent fees based on. on recovered amounts
• Item nine is an agency request for new Writer that would provide the authority to charge a rental fee
• At that time, there was a $2 fee assessed on each transaction that went through the Texas.gov account
• This is funding to develop a JCO certification program. and training and skill development.

Keywords: 1184, house, all

Transcript Highlights:

• That fee can apply to a number of That fee can apply to a number of properties<00:14:26.240> as
• what we're using. all of these properties have developed. all of these properties have developed.
• > expenses develop the amount of expenses develop the amount of expenses uh<00:20:22.960> that
• <00:20:59.919> what very important in trying to develop what very important in trying to develop
• Thank you, Chair Scott. from representative fee maybe there's a from representative fee maybe there's

Keywords: 1183, house

Transcript Highlights:

• Development, tourism, emergency response, and everyday connectivity.
• First, we provide grants for construction, planning, and development of projects.
• This is one fee schedule that has not been changed. since 1963.
• Economic Development likewise.
• The idea is we developed a presentation.

Transcript Highlights:

• I might suggest that the fee would go to, of course, to disperse.
• it no matter what right you take a fee it no matter what right you take a fee of<00:43:01.559>
• We have the developer, the foundation as a partner, and...
• It would be the loss of the property and probably legal fees associated with that.
• It would be the loss of the property and probably legal fees associated with that.

Keywords: 912, senate, all

Summary: The meeting covered several Senate resolutions related to the University of Hawaiʻi system, the East-West Center, and related education and workforce issues. On SCR 178 and SR 48, testifiers strongly supported the East-West Center, describing it as an important Hawaii asset that promotes cultural exchange, global citizenship, diplomacy, and ties to the University of Hawaiʻi. Speakers said the Center has helped train leaders and bring international connections and investment to Hawaii, and they urged continued funding despite federal cuts. The chairs then recommended passage with technical amendments, and both resolutions were adopted by the committees. The committee also heard testimony on resolutions calling for audits of University of Hawaiʻi operations. On SR 32 and SCR 50, the University of Hawaiʻi said it supported the resolution and had already begun work on establishing a Bachelor of Science in nursing at the UH Maui campus, with additional staff available on Zoom to answer questions. On SR 160 and SCR 142, which sought a financial and performance audit of UH Mānoa facilities, UH Athletics said it already undergoes annual financial audits required by NCAA bylaws but not performance audits, and discussed its internal evaluations, contingency planning, and efforts to address concerns raised by student athletes and staff. The committee then took up SCR 138 and SR 55, requesting a management and performance audit of the UH Office of the Vice President for Academic Strategy. Vice President Deborah Halbert and P20 Director Steve Shotz said they did not oppose the audit and believed it could provide clarity, while explaining that the office is relatively new and works collaboratively across campuses on articulation, transfer, grants, and workforce alignment. They described grant programs including Perkins, GEAR UP, preschool development, and data-sharing efforts, and said they are focusing more resources on teaching, health care, and skilled trades. The discussion also touched on SR 54, a proposed performance audit of the UH Foundation, where foundation representatives said they already undergo annual financial audits, acknowledged some donor communication issues, but emphasized improved stewardship and growth in fundraising over recent years.

Transcript Highlights:

• fees that would increase this.
• transfer fees and exempt reporting<01:03:09.440> advisor<01:03:09.880> fees<01:03:10.200
• so it's not all reporting advisor fees so it's not all licensing<01:03:11.160> fees<01:03:11.440
• > on then we would charge a nominal fee on then we would charge a nominal fee on narrowly<01:03
• > that<01:03:31.680> are make sure that we have fees that are make sure that we have fees

Keywords: 1183, house

Transcript Highlights:

• Our barrier islands cannot handle more development.
• The witness continued that developers would make taxpayers pay for developers' costs, and said citizens
• They accuse us now of not charging enough impact fees.
• the size or type of development.
• They were developed and built after World War II.

Summary: The committee heard five housing- and resilience-related bills. HB 793 would create an International Aerospace Innovation Fund administered by Space Florida to support aerospace research, workforce development, and commercialization; it was amended with a clarifying change and passed unanimously. C.S. for HB 411 would extend an affordable housing property tax exemption to certain nonprofit projects on leased land through a housing finance authority, such as Habitat for Humanity projects; it also passed unanimously. HB 701 would require local housing assistance plans to allow mobile home owners on leased land to seek help with lot rent, and it passed unanimously after an amendment and testimony from mobile home advocates and AARP in support. The committee also considered C.S. for HB 393, which expands the My Safe Florida Condominium Pilot Program to help eligible condominiums fund hurricane mitigation projects, including roof-related work, with added eligibility and inspection requirements. The bill drew support from condo and housing groups and passed unanimously with committee substitute. The final and most extensive measure, HB 943, would significantly revise state land-use and development rules to promote affordable housing by limiting local restrictions, changing zoning and approval standards, adjusting parking and impact fee rules, and expanding accessory dwelling unit and mixed-use provisions. It generated extensive testimony, with many local officials, city and county groups, and preservation advocates opposing it as overly broad and preemptive, while housing and business groups supported it. HB 943 was amended several times during the meeting, including changes related to church-owned property, parking, historic landmarks, manufactured homes as accessory dwelling units, and fair housing language. The sponsor repeatedly said the bill was a work in progress and that additional changes would be made. After debate from members emphasizing both the need for more housing and the need to preserve local control, the committee approved HB 943 on a 14-1 vote, with Rep. Casello voting no.

Transcript Highlights:

• And on the electric vehicle, the user fee on that, we have a user fee on electric vehicles and plug-in
• And on the electric vehicle, the user fee on that, we have a user fee on electric vehicles and plug-in
• had a a hybrid fee that was being had a a hybrid fee that was being collected.<00:12:32.399> I
• fee was removed. removed. removed.
• user fee on that, we we have a user fee user fee on that, we we have a user fee on<00:13:52.399>

Keywords: This meeting was recovered from a back up copy and uploaded after the original meeting took place., 958, all

Summary: The committee received an update from the Kentucky Transportation Cabinet on the FY 2025 road fund. Officials reported road fund revenues came in $38.5 million above the enacted estimate, but were down about $11 million from FY 2024, largely because a motor fuels tax rate reduction took effect at the start of FY 2025. Motor vehicle usage tax receipts were stronger than expected, and the cabinet said the road fund ended the year with a $61.6 million surplus, which the budget bill directs to state highway construction. Members also discussed how the motor fuels decline affects formula distributions to cities, counties, and rural/secondary roads, with officials saying about $122.8 million had been planned for revenue sharing but was not distributed because receipts were lower than forecast. Members asked about broader revenue trends, including fuel efficiency, electric vehicles, and the removal of a hybrid fee. Cabinet officials said improved fuel efficiency and CAFE standards reduce gasoline consumption and therefore fuel tax receipts, while EVs and plug-in hybrids are subject to a user fee. They also said toll revenues from the Louisville bridges are covering bills and commitments, though they did not have detailed figures at hand. On project delivery, officials said delays are often caused by right-of-way acquisition, utility relocation, and the large volume of projects in the highway plan, and that much of the work happens behind the scenes before construction begins. The committee also reviewed the cabinet’s cash management approach, which was adopted after 2000 to avoid setting aside full project costs all at once and to keep the road fund cash balance above a required minimum. Officials said the balance typically rises in winter and falls in summer as project bills come due, and that the current balance was about $166 million. They also reported that project awards for the year were nearing $998 million and expected to exceed last year’s total. No formal votes or legislative actions were taken beyond approving the prior meeting minutes.

Transcript Highlights:

• Economic Development Administration.
• On the next page, the regulatory fees.
• The regulatory fees per the compact are the fees that the tribes have agreed to pay the state in lieu
• Fees, but that, again, that's a separate fee from the revenue-sharing fees.
• Is that the regulatory fees? Revenue share, sorry, the revenue share, OK.

Transcript Highlights:

• thing is we would continue developing thing is we would continue developing zeroc<00:24:32.840><
• Technology support for developing Technology support for developing highest<00:25:26.440> quality
• Development Development Associates<00:50:03.799> as<00:50:03.960> you<00:50:04.079>
• I'd like to start with the development I'd like to start with the Workforce<00:51:55.160> Development
• <01:41:15.920> we Employment and economic development we Employment and economic development

Keywords: 1183, house

Transcript Highlights:

• OUR H O K ARCHITECT IS ACTUALLY DOING THE DESIGN DEVELOPMENT.
• YOU DO THE DIFFICULT JOB OF TRYING TO DEVELOP THE BUDGET TO MEET THE NEEDS OF THE JUSTICE SYSTEM AND
• I HAVE BEEN BEATING THE DRUM OF RAISING FILING FEES IN CIVIL CASES.
• I DO AS A POLICY MATTER TO THE LEGISLATURE ON WHETHER THERE IS THE NEED TO INCREASE THOSE FEES.
• IF YOU KNOW WHEN IS THE LAST TIME FILING FEES WERE LOOKED AT OR REACHED?

Transcript Highlights:

• What is the current fee, both for either entrance or parking for state parks?
• Is there a standard fee, or is it based regionally?
• We have a visitor use fee. It ranges usually between $8 to $10 per park.
• But just in general, what fees are associated with that?
• Sixteen percent of that's developed and 84% of it is still open space.

Keywords: 993, senate, all

Summary: The joint meeting of the Senate Finance Committee and the Committee on Cultural Affairs, Tourism, Parks, and Recreation considered Governor Hochul’s nomination of Kathleen “Kathy” Moser to serve as Commissioner of the Office of Parks, Recreation, and Historic Preservation. Moser described her background in conservation and public lands, and said her priorities would include improving access and belonging for all New Yorkers, maintaining health and safety, modernizing infrastructure, addressing climate change and sustainability, and strengthening partnerships with local governments, community groups, and the Legislature. Members questioned her on a range of park issues, including visitor fees, safety at swimming areas such as Lake Welch, security measures at parks, access for urban residents through nature buses and school transportation grants, maintenance and capital needs, event permitting, workforce recruitment and retention, and coordination around the 250th anniversary of the American Revolution. Moser said the department has targeted capital and safety investments at popular parks, is installing fencing, lighting, cameras, and license plate readers at entrances at selected sites, and is planning extensive 250th commemoration programming and historic-site renovations. She also discussed efforts to expand community stewardship, including partner groups, culturally specific amenities like cricket fields, and outreach through traveling exhibits and social media. Senators raised concerns and suggestions about renewable energy siting, cell service in rural areas, invasive species prevention, and local infrastructure needs. After questioning concluded, the committees voted to advance the nomination, and the motion was reported to the Senate floor.

Transcript Highlights:

• the percentage of tipping fees they received when this was first implemented.
• of tipping fees they received when this was first implemented.
• 15% to 18% would be 10% of total tipping fees.
• So it's not, talking proportionally, it's not taking a very large share of the tipping fees.
• No tax funds, no tipping fee funds. You know, it's an unfortunate situation.

Keywords: 959, house, all

Summary: The committee met to hear Senate Bill 1586, sponsored by Senator Ben Brown, which would address abandoned, ownerless landfills in Missouri. Brown described a constituent’s discovery of contamination near an abandoned landfill in St. Clair and argued the state has at least 29 similar sites, creating risks to water supplies and public health. He said the bill evolved through multiple versions and now keeps the solid waste districts intact while redirecting 10% of tipping fees to fund environmental studies, investigation, remediation, and management of ownerless landfills. The bill also would clarify seller disclosure requirements by requiring written, dated notice delivered by mail. Members questioned the fiscal impact and whether the 10% diversion would effectively amount to a larger share of district revenues. Brown said he was open to further discussion but emphasized the need to fund at least initial studies and to create an interim committee for broader stakeholder input next year. Supportive testimony came from University of Missouri engineering dean Marisa Crusoe, who said the bill provides both a clearer regulatory framework and a stable funding stream, and that studies are a necessary first step to determine cleanup costs and potential reuse of the sites. Opposition testimony came from solid waste district representatives, including Chris Busson, Diana Bryant, and Lacey Miller. They argued the districts already perform important recycling and household hazardous waste functions, that the proposed cut would significantly reduce local programs and staffing, and that DNR already has authority to address abandoned landfills. They also said the districts are subject to oversight and that the system has generally worked, while warning that consolidation or funding cuts would harm local recycling, grants, and hazardous waste services. No vote was taken, and the hearing concluded without further business.

Transcript Highlights:

• Uh, creates a fee of $40 for that non-domiciled CDL.
• Uh, creates a fee of $40 for that non-domiciled CDL.
• Uh, creates a fee of $40 for that non-domiciled CDL.
• Uh, creates a fee of $40 for that non-domiciled CDL.
• Uh, creates a fee of $40 for that non-domiciled CDL.

Keywords: 927, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• Corporation would act as a land bank and be able to develop plans and RFPs and RFQs for development
• developers?
• ..to help by offsetting permitting fees or connection fees at this time?
• and also mixed-income development.
• I lead cooperative housing development for the Northwest Cooperative Development Center.

Summary: The committee met for work sessions on land banking/shared homeownership and on maximizing existing housing stock. Members first heard an overview from Commerce on alternative homeownership models, including community land trusts, limited equity cooperatives, condominiums, accessory dwelling units, middle housing, church land for housing, and public land transfers. The discussion focused on how these models can help households build equity while keeping housing permanently affordable. Committee members asked about statewide counts of co-ops and land trusts, and Commerce said it does not track all of those entities directly. Pierce County staff then described the Pierce County Community Development Corporation’s rapid acquisition fund and its role in acquiring, holding, and transferring public land for affordable housing. They said the county used general fund and affordable housing sales tax dollars to buy properties, preserve a manufactured home park through resident ownership, and create a pipeline of sites for future development. Members asked about the advantages of a public development authority, funding sources, the use of surplus and underutilized public property, and how the model works with housing authorities. Spokane land bank staff followed with testimony that land banks can reduce blight, preserve affordability, and help nonprofits acquire land quickly, but that holding costs and taxes can make the work harder without state support. They also described brownfield assessments, donated properties, and work on Black homeownership and public surplus properties. The committee then heard from the Northwest Cooperative Development Center on limited equity cooperatives, especially in manufactured housing communities. The witness said Washington now has about 43 limited equity co-ops and that recent subsidy funding and legislation have accelerated resident purchases of manufactured home communities. Members asked how residents benefit from capped equity, how values are affected, and whether the model improves access to lending; the witness said the model stabilizes costs, allows modest equity gains, and that a recent law allowing manufactured homes in co-ops to be titled as real property should improve access to traditional financing. The committee also discussed House Bill 1974 from the prior session and possible updates to land banking legislation. In the second work session on maximizing existing housing stock, Commerce reviewed recent housing laws and implementation timelines, including ADUs, middle housing, condo liability reform, SEPA changes, tiny homes, and co-living. Members raised concerns about the long implementation horizon, vacancy data, corporate ownership of homes, and the need for better support for small landlords and first-time ADU owners. Sightline then testified on mobile dwelling units, arguing that RVs, tiny houses on wheels, and similar units are a low-cost, quick-to-install housing option that is often blocked by zoning; the witness said many Washington residents already live in these units, often informally. Finally, AARP discussed housing options for older adults, including ADUs, missing middle, manufactured home communities, co-living, universal design, and village-style support models, emphasizing aging in place and the need for more accessible, affordable housing choices.

Transcript Highlights:

• , standardizing application fees, capping tenant screening fees at $50, and regulating late fees.
• fees are non-refundable, so folks are paying those fees over and over again.
• This is in addition to sometimes a $100 admin fee or $200 holding fee, sometimes in conjunction with
• all of those fees that are non-refundable.
• We are not asking to regulate those types of fees, just the fees associated with processing an application

Transcript Highlights:

• suits concerning Live Local, and increases attorney fee provisions to $200,000 from $100,000.
• We've also specifically dealt with planned unit developments as well.
• local government's ability to enact art fees.
• It was built by a private developer to service that area.
• that they add in, in addition to our 25% surcharge fee.

Summary: The committee heard and acted on a long agenda of local, housing, education, construction, and claims bills. It first took up SB 1730 on affordable housing/Live Local changes, adopting an amendment that narrowed and clarified several provisions, including density, height, parking, attorney fees, and exclusions for certain protected areas, then reported the bill favorably. It also approved SB 1674, which clarifies that local investment restrictions cannot block Israel bonds, after a clarifying amendment. SB 140 on charter schools was reported favorably after significant debate over school conversion, teacher contracts, local control, and the use of surplus school property for housing or other public purposes; several speakers opposed it as harmful to public schools, while the sponsor said it preserved district authority and added options for municipalities and job creation. The committee also passed SB 96 and SB 4, two local claims bills, and SB 1714, which allows SHIP funds to help mobile home owners with lot rent and requires local housing plans to address mobile home park closures.