Video & Transcript Research : 'protective injunctions'
Page 14 of 500
TX
Transcript Highlights:
- That's not protection; it's a cover-up.
- H.B. 4623 protects good educators... ...your head on.
- That's not protection; it's a cover-up.
- I got that from Child Protective Services. The schools would not give it to me.
- And we don't have time to protect our kids; we have to protect them now.
Keywords:
district composition, congressional election, Texas, legislature, voting districts, fraudulent solicitation, disaster relief, nonprofit organizations, criminal penalties, consumer protection, fraud prevention, charitable donations
Summary:
The committee first took up House Bill 2853, which would allow the UT System Board of Regents to adjust the University of Texas at El Paso student union fee above the current statutory cap, subject to student approval, to help fund a new student union building. Senator Blanco explained the bill and the committee substitute, there were no questions or witnesses, public testimony was closed, and the committee adopted the substitute and left the bill pending subject to the call of the chair.
The committee then heard House Bill 610, which would limit severance payments for terminated independent school district superintendents to six months’ salary and benefits. Senator Paxton described large severance payouts and said the bill had passed the House overwhelmingly. There were no witnesses, public testimony was closed, and the bill was left pending.
A lengthy hearing followed on House Bill 4623, which would waive school district immunity in certain cases involving negligent hiring, supervision, or employment of professional school employees who commit abuse or related misconduct against students. Senator Paxton and several witnesses, including survivors and parents, argued the bill was needed to address cover-ups, delayed reporting, and repeated failures to remove dangerous employees; some members raised concerns about liability caps, litigation, and how the bill would interact with the Tort Claims Act. The committee also heard from TEA staff and employee-group witnesses who discussed possible injunctions and stronger no-hire protections. Public testimony was then closed and the bill was left pending.
Finally, the committee heard House Bill 4, an accountability and assessment bill that would restore A-F ratings, change the state testing system, and replace STAAR with shorter, more instructionally useful assessments. Senator Bettencourt explained the committee substitute, including annual ratings, limits on taxpayer-funded lawsuits, and a phased-in testing redesign with beginning, middle, and end-of-year assessments. Testimony was generally supportive from education and business groups, though some witnesses favored norm-referenced testing while others emphasized criterion-referenced, TEKS-aligned assessments; one witness noted social studies assessments were restored in the bill. The hearing concluded with additional invited testimony and no final vote reported in the transcript.
WI
Wisconsin 2026 1st Special Session
Joint Committee on Finance May 12th, 2026
Joint Committee on Finance
Transcript Highlights:
- Initially, the district court issued an injunction prohibiting the enforcement of this provision.
- Court of Appeals for the First District stayed the injunction pending appeal... ...of this provision.
- Protection Program. ...request to fund the Public Protective Services Hearing Protection Program.
- Services Hearing Protection Program, which would provide hearing protection devices to law enforcement
- and fire protective agencies in the state. ...enforcement and fire protective agencies in the state.
TX
Transcript Highlights:
- That injunction is still in effect.
- That injunction is still in effect.
- In terms of protecting the public, is the public better protected by leaving the law as it is, or is
- it better protected by doing what this bill proposes?
- to give them protection from the liability that would shut down that protection.
Bills:
HB 1181, HB3704, HB1363, HB1610, HB1615, HB1620, HB3223, HB1317, HB2884, HB2176, HB4027, HB1664, HB933, HB2613, HB3353, HB2086, HB4101, HB3441, HB4145, HB3455
Keywords:
judiciary, judges, justices, retired, legal assignments, judicial conduct, notary public, criminal offense, education requirements, official documents, record retention, implicit bias, bias training, judicial training, judge education, court personnel, continuing legal education, CLE, state bar, Texas Court of Criminal Appeals
TX
Transcript Highlights:
- And here we're focused. and trying to make sure we protect the general public, or what is?
- Well, thank you for your bill, and I think we as public officials and senators owe a duty. to protect
- Governor for making these bills priorities and again this is a continued effort to protect public safety
- We need to pass any law that we can to protect all Texans, every. law-abiding man woman and child in
- It does allow for attorney's fees for the citizens seeking injunctive.
Bills:
SJR1, SB9, SB40, SJR36, SJR1, SJR5, SB9, SB40, SJR1, SB9, SB40, SR62, SR92, SR95, SR108, SR110, SR111, SR113, SR114, SR117, SR120, SB314, SB314
Keywords:
bail denial, illegal aliens, felony offenses, constitutional amendment, law enforcement, bail reform, defendants, pretrial detention, public safety, criminal justice, charitable bail organizations, bail bonds, public funds, political subdivision, injunctive relief, taxpayer rights, bail, criminal justice reform, El Paso, economic development
HI
Hawaii 2025 Regular Session
ECD Public Hearing - Fri Jan 31, 2025 @ 10:00 AM HST
Economic Development & Technology
Transcript Highlights:
- I'm Raji Talentino with the Office of Consumer Protection, OCP.
- Hawaii's consumer protection laws.
- Thank you. with offic of consumer protection um ocp with offic of consumer protection um ocp an<00:23
- has<00:23:34.120>
long an office consumer protection has long an office consumer protection - with enforcing State consumer protection with enforcing State consumer protection laws<00:52:36.400
Summary:
The House Committee on Economic Development and Technology heard testimony on several measures, including HB 671 on Native Hawaiian data tabulation, HB 639 on AI chatbot disclosures and consumer protection, HB 1391 on a proposed Hawaii/Irish trade commission, HB 1361, HB 1384 on an AI advisory council, HB 1292, and HB 1308 on online sports wagering. Testimony on HB 671 focused on clarifying how Native Hawaiian categories should be defined for data purposes, with Eugene Tian noting Census data can tabulate Native Hawaiians alone but not those in combination with other races without special tabulation. HB 639 drew support from DCCA’s Office of Consumer Protection, which said the bill should advance but may need amendments to align with existing consumer protection law and preserve OCP enforcement authority. HB 1384 received support from ETS, which said an AI advisory council would help establish governance and standards for state AI use. HB 1391 drew comments in support from DBEDT and one testifier who urged a broader U.S./Hawaii/EU framing rather than a bill focused on Ireland. HB 1361 was heard with no testimony in the excerpt, and HB 1292 received support from the Hawaii Community Development Authority and opposition from HGA, which warned the measure could open the door to privatizing or outsourcing government services. HB 1308 drew extensive testimony both for and against, with supporters arguing legalized online sports betting could generate revenue for education, housing, health care, child care, and problem gambling treatment, while opponents raised concerns about regulation, oversight, and the social impacts of gambling. Supporters included BetMGM, DraftKings, and the Iron Workers Stabilization Fund, while the Department of Taxation and Office of Information Practices also provided comments. The committee then moved into decision-making and adopted the chair’s recommendations to pass HB 671, HB 639, HB 1391, and HB 1384 with amendments, while HB 1361 and HB 1292 were deferred. For HB 1308, the chair outlined a substantial HD1 with changes including limiting the bill to internet-connected mobile or digital wagering platforms, shifting regulatory responsibility from DBED to DCCA, adding confidentiality language tied to UIPA, and using committee notes to reference other states’ tax percentages and agency testimony; members discussed the need for guardrails, and one member changed from a no vote to reservations, but the excerpt ends before the final vote is shown.
TX
Transcript Highlights:
- under Chapter 211 of the Local Government Code and the Texas Constitution provides due process protections
- such as notice and hearing, requirements, there remains significant confusion over how these protections
- It's like a positive injunction, right? Okay. And so, mandamus...
- So it's an important bill to protect property owners in those cases.
- I mean, there has to be abilities for municipalities to protect their historic landmarks.
Keywords:
zoning, municipality, municipal immunity, governmental immunity, local government, Chapter 211, Texas Local Government Code, land use, declaratory relief, injunctive relief, mandamus, attorney's fees, court costs, property rights, home rule city, code enforcement, planning and zoning, land development, municipal ordinance, historic landmark
MN
Minnesota 2025 1st Special Session
House Elections Finance and Government Operations Committee 3/17/25
Elections Finance and Government Operations
Transcript Highlights:
- What's protected in 504 for landlord-tenant law, which, you know, she showed you the book.
- <00:57:12.400>
piece subdivision 8 about the injunction piece subdivision 8 about the injunction - um if they want to of about injunctions um if they want to of settlements<00:57:36.839>
um <00 - um the injunction piece is is<00:57:51.640>
generally <00:57:52.440>the <00:57:52.760>< - Center our shared humanity and protect Center our shared humanity and protect all<01:21:28.840><
Keywords:
sacred communities, micro units, religious institutions, housing regulations, homelessness, conditional use permits, immigration enforcement, sanctuary policies, sanctuary city, noncooperation ordinance, ICE, U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, federal immigration authorities, deportation, undocumented immigrant, undocumented person, immigration status data, data sharing, preemption, local government
ND
North Dakota 2025-2026 Regular Session
Senate State and Local Government Apr 10th, 2025 at 09:00 am
State and Local Government
Transcript Highlights:
- Additionally, with executive orders, injunctions, courts, courts...
- Additionally, with executive orders, injunctions, court stays, all of those sorts of things, we've seen
- a lot of uncertainty leading into an election cycle where we could potentially be faced with an injunction
- notwithstanding, you could do that without compromising the intent of the bill, but the intent is actually to protect
Summary:
The State and Local Government Committee met to reconsider and amend House Bill 1165, which dealt with petition circulation requirements and ballot receipt rules. The committee walked through technical changes requested by the Secretary of State’s office, including moving petition-title language, adding a 15-business-day submission deadline for petition packets, and revising language related to mailed absentee ballots and the presidential executive order requiring ballots to be received by election day rather than merely postmarked. The State Election Director explained that the change was intended to provide clarity and consistency for voters and election officials, while Senator Braunberger objected that it was an unnecessary reaction to an executive order that could be challenged. The committee adopted the amendment 5-1 and then passed the bill as amended on a 5-1 vote, with Senator Braunberger voting no.
The committee then took up House Bill 1307, which concerned election authority, home rule powers, and related city and county petition/signature provisions. After questions from members and clarification from the Deputy Secretary of State and a League of Cities representative, the committee agreed the amendment was intended to preserve city petition power and align the bill with changes made in another election bill, while also addressing park district language. The amendment was adopted 6-0, and the bill was passed as amended 6-0. Senator Castaneda was designated as the carrier.
Finally, the committee discussed House Bill 1580, a study bill on state employee compensation. Members used language from an earlier draft tied to health plan changes and broadened it to study total rewards compensation, including pay grades, classifications, comparisons among state employees across departments and with similar private-sector jobs, equity funding and bonuses, prevailing wages on state projects, and the impact of changes to health plan benefits and premium structures. The committee agreed to make the language more generic and adopted the amendment 6-0, then passed the bill as amended 6-0. House Bill 1601 was not acted on and was held until after floor session so members could continue discussions and await additional input.
FL
Florida 2025 Regular Session
Judiciary Mar 12th, 2025
Transcript Highlights:
- I ask you to please protect Florida's legal aid funding by voting no on Senate Bill 498.
- I know there has been an issue sometimes with domestic violence injunctions also.
- What you're doing is removing protected speech, government forcing of internet.
- And it is protective of this for the betterment of the community.
- A similar provision in Florida would improve transparency and tenant protection.
NM
New Mexico 2025 Regular Session
IC - Courts, Corrections and Justice Sep 23rd, 2025
Courts, Corrections & Justice Committee
Transcript Highlights:
- However, the current executive is seeking to strip legal protections from those groups who apply for
- This protection has been stripped away from children since June.
- The Sensitive Data Act was to protect public safety and to protect individuals from excesses.
- I think the main brunt of this statute is is injunctive relief.
- We are protecting the disenfranchised, and I'm very proud of that.
TX
Transcript Highlights:
- That injunction is still in effect.
- That injunction is still in effect.
- And those standards are designed to protect society in general, uh, that you should have some protection
- I, In terms of protecting the public.
- protection.
CA
California 2025-2026 Regular Session
Assembly Budget Subcommittee No. 5 on State Administration Mar 10th, 2026
Transcript Highlights:
- Since the passage of this program, protections offered under SIBTF are now provided, Since the passage
- With the injunction, or is there anything that California can enforce on our own?
- And how does this partial injunction and the lawsuit impact the BCP? Okay.
- It’s just I also want to protect the state where we can. All right.
- It's just I also want to protect the state where we can. All right.
Summary:
The Budget Subcommittee on State Administration heard presentations on the Department of Industrial Relations’ labor-related budget items, with the main focus on proposed trailer bill language to reform the Subsequent Injury Benefits Trust Fund (SIBTF) and a related budget change proposal for staffing. DIR said SIBTF has grown far beyond its original purpose, citing the 2020 Todd decision, expanded eligibility based on chronic or asymptomatic conditions, and a backlog that has grown to more than 30,000 pending cases. The administration argued the reforms would restore guardrails, reduce liabilities and employer assessments, and speed processing for severely injured workers; the LAO said the proposal was largely consistent with its prior recommendations. Members raised concerns about using trailer bill language for major policy changes, the retroactive application to open cases, and the impact on workers already in the queue, while supporters from employer groups and public agencies backed the proposal as necessary to control costs and restore sustainability. Public comment was split, with injured-worker advocates opposing the retroactive changes and business/public employer representatives supporting the reforms.
The committee then heard the SIBTF workload request, which would phase in 177 positions over five years at a cost of $36.5 million, including staff for the Division of Workers’ Compensation, the Office of the Director Legal Unit, and administrative support. DIR said the additional staffing is intended to address very high caseloads and reduce processing times, but emphasized that the request assumes the reform package is adopted; LAO agreed the staffing increase made sense if paired with reforms. Members asked about vacancy rates, current staffing, and whether the workload request would become the new normal, and DIR said it would monitor caseload trends and adjust future requests as needed.
Finally, the committee received an update on the California Workplace Outreach Program (CWOP), which DIR described as a partnership with community-based organizations to educate workers and help employers comply with labor laws. DIR reported that CWOP has reached 1.75 million workers and employers and made 8 million touchpoints since 2020, with the current round awarding $50.7 million to 87 partners for a two-year period through June 2027. Members and public commenters highlighted the program’s role in reaching immigrant, farmworker, janitorial, nail salon, and other vulnerable communities, and several speakers urged continued funding at $30 million per year for five years. No votes were taken during the hearing.
TX
Texas 89th Regular
Senate of the 89th Legislature Feb 19th, 2025 at 11:00 am
Texas Senate Floor Meeting
Transcript Highlights:
- J.R. shows the state's commitment to protect our citizens and assist the federal government in their
- And here we're focused. and trying to make sure we protect the general public, or what is?
- Well, thank you for your bill, and I think we as public officials and senators owe a duty. to protect
- Right, and the bill provides for injunctive relief.
- It does allow for attorney's fees for the citizens seeking injunctive.
Keywords:
bail denial, illegal aliens, felony offenses, constitutional amendment, law enforcement, bail reform, defendants, pretrial detention, public safety, criminal justice, charitable bail organizations, bail bonds, public funds, political subdivision, injunctive relief, taxpayer rights, bail, criminal justice reform
MN
Minnesota 2025 1st Special Session
House Press Conference 3/19/25
Transcript Highlights:
- <00:05:15.199>
for on strong consumer protection for on strong consumer protection for seniors - <00:19:17.520>
the the right thing in protecting the the right thing in protecting the veterans - <00:26:16.960>
protection <00:26:18.000>uh kinds of sum consumer protection uh kinds - So yes, the to protect themselves.
- about preventing fraud and protecting about preventing fraud and protecting motans<00:29:39.200>
AL
Alabama 2026 Regular Session
Alabama Senate Special Session 2026 May 6th, 2026
Alabama Senate Floor Meeting
Transcript Highlights:
- We need to ensure voters are protected.
- . protections. protections.
- protections were weakened. protections were weakened.
- It protects the fundamental right to vote.
- >
right <00:48:29.119>to It protects the fundamental right to It protects the fundamental
Summary:
The Alabama Senate convened with prayer, the pledge, and a roll call establishing a quorum of 34 senators present. The chamber then received a House message referring House Bill 1 on primary elections to the Committee on County and Municipal Government, and moved to Senate Bill 1, also dealing with primary elections and tied to ongoing court action over Alabama’s legislative maps. Senator Elliott explained SB 1 as a prospective measure meant to set up a special election if federal courts lift injunctions on the state Senate districts, while opponents argued the bill was being rushed and could disrupt voters, candidates, absentee voters, and election administration.
Much of the debate focused on whether the bill would effectively change election rules too close to an election and whether it conflicted with a 2022 statewide amendment requiring election-related changes to take effect at least six months before a general election. Supporters said the bill simply preserves the legislature’s enacted maps and responds to recent court rulings, while opponents said it could disenfranchise voters, especially military, elderly, absentee, rural, and Black voters, and that the underlying litigation and federal Voting Rights Act issues remained unresolved. Several members also referenced a Brennan Center report and broader concerns about racial turnout gaps and minority representation in Alabama.
Senator Coleman offered an amendment to give the state discretion rather than mandate a special election, arguing it would better align with the current court order; the Senate rejected it on a roll call vote, 8 yeas to 25 nays. Senator Vivian Figures then offered a notice-focused amendment requiring adequate public notice before any election changes, arguing that voters need time to learn new dates, polling places, deadlines, and ballot information; that amendment also failed on a roll call vote, with the clerk announcing it did not pass. The transcript ends with further discussion beginning after the failed amendment votes.
TX
Texas 89th 2nd C.S.
Licensing & Administrative Procedures Mar 25th, 2025
Licensing & Administrative Procedures
Transcript Highlights:
- providing students with alternative pathways to pursue a CPA license while maintaining great standards to protect
- substantial equivalency to what we require here, and that helps Texas continue to ensure that we are protecting
- Chairman, members, frequently, um, the attorneys typically, uh, pursue civil injunctions against illicit
- Under the current system, local attorneys have mostly focused on obtaining injunctions and temporarily
- We would do our efforts on the civil side to get injunctive relief, but having this extra.
HI
Hawaii 2026 Regular Session
EDT DEFER, EDT-EDU, WLA-EDT-EDU, EDT Public Hearings 02-17-2026
Economic Development and Tourism
Transcript Highlights:
- >
the <00:15:09.519>assault already protected under the assault already protected under - just declar a declaratory or injunctive just declar a declaratory or injunctive relief<00:18:43.919
- want to protect their employees through<00:20:06.720>
injunctive <00:20:07.520>programs - ><00:20:08.320>
by <00:20:08.559>giving through injunctive programs by giving through injunctive- And I don't think that that protection."
- ><00:20:08.320>
Summary:
The committee first took up Senate Bill 2693 relating to capital improvement projects for aerospace infrastructure. Members had no questions, and the recommendation to pass the bill with a defective date of July 1, 2050 was adopted unanimously. The committee then deferred decision making on Senate Bill 26980 relating to transportation and Senate Bill 2374 relating to the blue economy until Thursday, February 19, 2026, in Room 229, pending additional information.
In the joint hearing on Senate Bill 2816 relating to state enterprise zones, agencies and organizations including DBEDT, HTDC, Taxation, the University of Hawaii Cancer Center, Oceanit, the Hawaii Medical Association, and the Queen’s Health System testified in support or submitted written comments. One public testifier urged expanding enterprise zones around the Kakaako/Cancer Center area and combining them with the foreign trade zone to reduce taxes and attract business. A senator questioned whether the enterprise zone program had ever been comprehensively evaluated, noting DBEDT said it had not done a full study in recent years and cited annual report figures including about $221 million in company revenues and $460,000 in foregone state revenue in 2022. The discussion focused on whether the bill would subsidize existing activity or support new economic development, and on the broader policy question of whether enterprise zones should be used to revitalize depressed areas or to target strategic sectors like health care technology.
The committee then heard Senate Bill 2900 relating to sports officials. The Department of Education supported the measure, saying the Attorney General is best positioned to represent employees in temporary restraining order matters and that elevating intentional bodily injury of a sports official to a class B felony would improve safety. The Office of the Public Defender opposed the bill, arguing it would escalate conduct already covered by existing assault statutes and go beyond other protected classes. The Department of the Attorney General recommended narrowing the bill by inserting “substantial” before bodily injury in the criminal section and deleting a section that would make the AG’s office act like plaintiff’s counsel in civil matters, suggesting instead that departments adopt policies to help employees obtain TROs without creating an open-ended civil representation role. Several sports and school-related organizations testified in support, and members discussed whether the bill should be narrowed or coordinated with other measures before further action.
NM
New Mexico 2025 Regular Session
IC - Federal Funding Stabilization Subcommittee Aug 1st, 2025
Federal Funding Stabilization Subcommittee
Transcript Highlights:
- The complaint in that matter was filed for injunctive relief again.
- There was a preliminary injunction that was issued in that matter.
- That complaint was for injunctive relief.
- As I said, the injunctions were issued to stop that from moving forward.
- Tager, but that was just a preliminary injunction, correct? Are you anticipating any change?
NM
New Mexico 2025 Regular Session
IC - Land Grant Oct 7th, 2025
House Rural Development, Land Grants And Cultural Affairs
Transcript Highlights:
- Now, by strengthening this funding, we're helping farmers and ranchers protect their water rights and
- What can the legislature do as a policy-making body to help them address protection of those resources
- I don't know if there's a legal action; I don't know the exact terms, but it has to do with injunctions
- I would encourage and urge to really look at that legal action that presents an injunction and presents
- Traditionally, we've paid for that out of the game protection fund, our license dollars, but I don't
MN
Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session
Committee on Health and Human Services - 03/25/26
Health and Human Services
Transcript Highlights:
- :04:09.920>
SNAP First, this recommendation protects SNAP First, this recommendation protects - ,<00:27:57.200>
maintain, MDH's mission is to protect, maintain, MDH's mission is to protect - <00:36:45.560>
So, <00:36:46.000>we challenge this uh injunction. - So, we challenge this uh injunction. So, we remain<00:36:46.800>
cautious. - The current 146A fails to protect public protection and provides no mechanism for accountability.