Video & Transcript : 'gasoline standards' :

Page 14 of 500
OK
WA

Washington 2025-2026 Regular Session

Senate Environment, Energy & Technology Feb 3rd, 2026 at 01:30 pm

Environment, Energy & Technology

Transcript Highlights:
  • and certain other standards on a coal facility as of December 31, 2025.
  • and certain other standards on a coal facility as of December 31, 2025.
  • It provides that the 90 parts per million lead content standard applies to cookware manufactured on or
  • after January 1st, 2026, and eliminates the 10 parts per million lead content standard that would be
  • Finally, it establishes future. standard that would be in effect in 2008.
WA

Washington 2025-2026 Regular Session

House Labor & Workplace Standards Jan 23rd, 2026 at 10:30 am

Labor & Workplace Standards

Transcript Highlights:
  • Welcome to the Labor and Workplace Standards Committee hearing.
  • shared understanding that wage theft hurts workers, communities, and the integrity of our labor standards
  • bill that requires the Department of Labor and Industries to consider certain national consensus standards
  • bill that requires the Department of Labor and Industries to consider certain national consensus standards
CA

California 2025-2026 Regular Session

Senate Floor Session May 27th, 2026

California Senate Floor Meeting

Transcript Highlights:
  • In the 1980s, California had roughly 50, more than 50 refineries producing gasoline.
  • It took us seven years to raise standards in that industry.
  • SB 1203 says, professionalism and public safety standards.
  • training is stronger, making sure the standards are clearer and creating a workable path forward.
  • AB 46 replaces that framework with a clearer standard, focused on whether someone poses a...
US

US Federal 2025-2026 Regular Session

US House Floor Proceedings (Monday, February 23, 2026)

US Federal House Floor Meeting

Transcript Highlights:
  • This legislation directs the National Institute of Standards and Technology, or NIST, to develop and
  • POTENTIAL AND FOR THE SMALL BUSINESSES THAT FORM THE This bill directs the National Institute of Standards
  • The National Institute of Standards and Technology can greatly help American small businesses understand
  • It also includes several additional Terms to make sure agencies are finally held to that standard.
  • My bill strengthens safeguards To ensure Federal agencies rely on data that meets clear standards for
Bills: SB2503 , HB5235 , HB6329 , HB3679 , HB2600 , HR390
WA

Washington 2025-2026 Regular Session

House Environment & Energy Feb 18th, 2026 at 10:30 am

Environment & Energy

Transcript Highlights:
  • So they're affected market customers, meaning that they are subject to the CETA standards.
  • What's the standard that requires us to have the third-party verification for those emission reductions
  • But we believe that's similar enough that we have a similar standard here for this as well.
  • In that same time period, gasoline demand declined modestly.
  • We're committed to ensuring its standards are applied fairly and comprehensively.
Bills: SB6013 , SB6291
CA

California 2025-2026 Regular Session

Senate Health Committee Mar 25th, 2026

Health

Transcript Highlights:
  • They would be no pollutants at all because they don't do gasoline.
  • But they still make them test for the stuff that would be in refineries for gasoline.
  • Thank you, Madam Chair. because they don't do gasoline.
  • But they still make them test for the stuff that would be in refiners for gasoline.
  • The work that we did was competent gold standard care that was approved by the plan.
Committee: Senate Health
NH

New Hampshire 2025 Regular Session

House Ways and Means (03/04/2025)

Transcript Highlights:
  • and those uh have minimal standards and those uh have minimal enforcement<00:52:22.119><c> or</c><00
  • That is sold at the pump, so the fee per gallon of gasoline is not necessarily reflected because this
  • would apply a cost to gasoline, petroleum, and household oil. in the billing process uh behind the in
  • is not necessarily reflected gasoline is not necessarily reflected because<01:05:11.599><c> this</c>
  • </c> because this would apply a cost gasoline because this would apply a cost gasoline petroleum<01:05
Summary: The committee first held a public hearing on HB 660, which would require historic horse racing facilities to provide 10% of HHR winnings to host municipalities as mitigation. Representative Om said the bill was intended to offset local costs associated with large gaming facilities, noting that prior gaming measures included opt-in provisions and that this proposal would leave charities and the state whole while taking the 10% from the operator’s share. Members questioned why 10% was chosen and whether municipalities were currently experiencing added costs; Om said the amount was meant to address projected future impacts, not broader municipal budget issues, and cited a study on casino-related community costs. Opponents from the New Hampshire Charitable Gaming Operators Association argued the bill unfairly singled out one industry and said gaming facilities do not impose more municipal burden than other entertainment venues. The hearing closed without a vote, and a member clarified the bill would apply to existing and future casinos/facilities. The committee then opened a hearing on HB 658-FN, which raises the cap on reimbursements from the Oil Discharge and Disposal Cleanup Fund and makes related changes to the Oil Pollution Control Fund. Representative Malloy introduced the bill, and Representative Aly described the funds as an insurance backstop for oil spill cleanup and low-income tank replacement, saying the program helps prevent environmental hazards and satisfies financial responsibility requirements. Bob Scully of the Energy Marketers Association supported the bill but noted that fee changes are ultimately passed on to consumers. Department of Environmental Services officials Robert Bishop and Jennifer Marts explained that the bill would change reporting deadlines, raise the reimbursement cap for low-income homeowners, extend the fee collection period for 10 years, and adjust petroleum import fees based on an actuarial review. They said the funds cover spill response, prevention, and tank replacement, and that the fee structure was designed to keep the funds solvent while balancing costs across fuel categories. Committee members asked about the actuarial basis for the fee changes, why some fees would rise while others would fall, and how the funds are used. DES said the review used 10 years of claims and exposure data and that the fuel oil fee would otherwise need to rise sharply, so the board proposed a smaller increase and rebalanced other fees. Members also asked about the scope of covered oil imports, and DES explained that the fee applies to oil destined for use in New Hampshire, not merely passing through the state. The discussion also covered home heating oil spills, which DES said are often discovered by homeowners or fire departments and are usually caused by tank corrosion, piping, or overfills. No votes were taken during the hearing, and the chair noted that the policy committee had already approved the bill before the finance-focused review.
AL

Alabama 2026 Regular Session

Alabama House Agriculture and Forestry Committee Feb 5th, 2026

Agriculture and Forestry

Transcript Highlights:
  • It would prohibit state agencies from adopting a rule to establish environmental protection standards
  • And the standard in what this bill does.
  • This is also not, no offense to the man who spoke before me, the gold standard that Trump laid out.
  • This is also not, no offense to the man who spoke before me, the gold standard that Trump laid out.
  • :21:39.200><c> industry</c> uniform standards across the industry uniform standards across the industry
Bills: SB71 , SB71
US

US Federal 2025-2026 Regular Session

Joint Address to Congress by the President of the United States (Tuesday, March 4, 2025)

US Federal House Floor Meeting

Transcript Highlights:
  • </c><02:23:10.920><c> for</c> to the National emission standards for to the National emission standards
  • </c><02:23:27.200><c> for</c> technology-based emission standards for technology-based emission standards
  • </c> under unrealistic efficiency standards under unrealistic efficiency standards hjr<02:53:23.640><
  • </c> limiting and anti-natural gas standards limiting and anti-natural gas standards from<02:53:28.560
  • </c> consumer goods not creating a standard consumer goods not creating a standard just<03:01:26.279>
Bills: HR919 , HR579 , HR177
HI

Hawaii 2025 Regular Session

HHS-AEN, HHS Public Hearings 01-31-2025

Health and Human Services

Transcript Highlights:
  • I would also emphasize that the standards that this bill calls for would also be another... smallest
  • um for the one binding legal standard um for the remediation<00:16:36.959><c> of</c><00:16:37.079><c
  • We know it's stored a variety of fuel, some of the older fuels like bunker C all the way to gasoline,
  • We know it's stored a variety of fuel, some of the older fuels like bunker C all the way to gasoline,
  • We know it's stored a variety of fuel, some of the older fuels like bunker C all the way to gasoline,
Summary: The committee heard testimony on several bills related to cesspools, Red Hill cleanup, water testing, environmental governance, and beverage container recycling. For SB 472, SB 501, SB 675, and SB 958 on cesspools, most testimony supported accelerating cesspool conversion and expanding Department of Health capacity, though the Attorney General flagged a single-subject issue on SB 472 and the Department of Health and others raised concerns about funding, program structure, and coordination. Supporters emphasized cesspools as a major water pollution source and urged earlier deadlines, while some testimony questioned the tax credit approach and asked for clearer grant and staffing language. For SB 639 on underground storage tanks and Red Hill cleanup, the Department of Health asked for clearer cleanup standards and noted limits on laboratory detection and sampling, while supporters argued the bill would create a binding legal standard for remediation and help prevent reopening of the facility. Testimony also stressed the need to remove all contamination to the extent practicable and protect aquifers and drinking water. SB 664 on water quality testing drew strong support from residents and water advocates, but the Department of Health warned the measure could duplicate existing authority and create significant cost; the Board of Water Supply supported the concept while noting it would expand responsibilities into private-property testing. SB 674 on environmental advisory council and waste reduction received mixed testimony: supporters said it would help address landfill siting and protect water resources, while industry groups requested changes to advisory council membership and exemptions for certain products, and one witness opposed the measure. For SB 1067 on deposit beverage container recycling, the Attorney General said the grant language may be constitutionally problematic because it lacks standards, while industry testimony both supported the recycling goals and asked for amendments, including broader representation on the advisory council and clearer treatment of compostable and packaging-related issues. No votes or final committee actions were taken in the portion provided.
MN

Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session

House Education Policy Committee 3/17/26

Education Policy

Transcript Highlights:
  • <00:19:48.160><c> of</c><00:19:48.880><c> fiscal</c><00:19:49.280><c> management,</c> standards of fiscal
  • management, standards of fiscal management, violations<00:19:50.640><c> of</c><00:19:50.880><c> law,
  • </c> All districts and charters are required to put state standards into place so that students receive
  • </c><00:24:21.279><c> uh</c> MTSS framework uh academic standards uh MTSS framework uh academic standards
  • </c><00:24:24.400><c> into</c> required to put state standards into required to put state standards into
Bills: HF3487 , HF3421
FL

Florida 2026 Regular Session

Education Pre-K - 12 Feb 3rd, 2026

Education Pre-K - 12

Bills: S0824 , S1170 , S1620 , S1738 , S7036
Summary: The Education Pre-K-12 Committee met and took up several education bills. It first heard SJR 1104 on religious expression in public schools, which would place a proposed constitutional amendment on the ballot to protect voluntary religious expression by students and school personnel. The sponsor said it would codify existing protections and not require prayer or religious activity, while opponents argued it was unnecessary, could be used to advance Christian nationalism, and could make minority-faith students uncomfortable. The committee reported the resolution favorably. The committee then approved SB 1738 on educational facilities, as amended, to require the Department of Education to review school facility requirements and recommend design and construction practices intended to improve safety and accountability. It also approved SB 824 on charter schools, as amended, which shifts the bill to a transparency-focused strike-all requiring districts to submit annual reports on unimproved land holdings to the Department of Education. The committee also confirmed appointees on Tabs 7 and 8. A major portion of the meeting focused on SB 1620 on public education, described by the sponsor as a “school board members’ bill of rights.” The bill would give board members broader access to district documents and staff, limit nondisclosure agreements, clarify attorney representation, and strengthen budget transparency and nepotism rules. Supporters said it would help board members do their oversight jobs, while opponents warned it could undermine superintendents, expose confidential student or employee information, and create confusion in district governance. The committee reported the bill favorably. Finally, the committee heard SB 1170 on education, as amended, which would allow parents of students with disabilities to request cameras in self-contained classrooms and set district procedures for reviewing those requests. Supporters, including parents and disability advocates, testified that cameras would protect non-speaking and vulnerable students and provide accountability, while one opponent argued the measure should be funded if adopted. The committee reported the bill favorably. The committee also adopted a committee-bill motion for SPB 7036, a broad education package covering school turnaround, literacy, safety, early learning, instruction, and educator pipeline issues, though members raised concerns about a possible state role in producing instructional materials; the bill was reported favorably as a committee bill.
WA

Washington 2025-2026 Regular Session

Senate Transportation Jan 26th, 2026 at 04:00 pm

Transportation

Transcript Highlights:
  • So for one, for an average male or female, they would, with one standard drink, reach 0.02 for men or
  • and provinces have enacted some form of a .05 standard.
  • This does not change the legal standard for initiating a traffic stop.
  • A professional decision-making process remains central to the enforcement standards.
  • The 0.05 standard is a measured, evidence-based practice for public safety.
Bills: SB5234 , SB6110 , SB6176
FL

Florida 2026 Regular Session

Health Policy Jan 26th, 2026

Health Policy

Transcript Highlights:
  • up payment decisions, lowers administrative cost for providers, and uses a proven fair national standard
  • Their statutes further direct the respective state boards of pharmacy to adopt rules establishing standard
  • And the standard protocol recommends that unvaccinated children stay home for 21 days. Thank you.
  • And the standard protocol recommends that unvaccinated children stay home for 21 days.
  • Yes, I still want to go back to the standard operating procedure that had been in effect for so long,
Bills: S1082 , S1168 , S1756 , S1156 , S1480
Summary: The committee took up several health-related bills. SB 1082, on a statewide provider and health plan claim dispute resolution program, was presented as a way to let providers and insurers use the federal independent dispute resolution process for emergency out-of-network claims under state-regulated commercial plans. A late-filed amendment clarified access to the state program, and the bill was reported favorably as a committee substitute. SB 1168, on background screenings, would centralize clearinghouse screening functions at the Agency for Health Care Administration; an amendment clarified that sealed and expunged records may be reviewed for eligibility determinations, and the bill was reported favorably as a committee substitute. SB 1156, on ambulatory surgical centers, would move their regulation into a standalone section of law separate from the hospital-focused Chapter 395, and it was reported favorably. The committee also considered SB 1480 on temporary certificates for practice in areas of critical need. A strike-all amendment created a grandfathering process for current certificate holders with active primary care relationships if federal designation changes remove an area’s critical-need status. Supporters said it would protect patients and preserve access to care in underserved areas, and the bill was reported favorably. The most extensive debate was on SB 1756, the medical freedom bill. The sponsor said it would require vaccine educational materials and alternative schedules for parents, expand school immunization exemptions to include conscience-based objections, clarify that emergency treatment authority does not include mandatory vaccination, and allow pharmacists to provide ivermectin behind the counter with written warnings. The committee adopted one amendment to extend liability protections to physicians as well as pharmacists, but rejected a substitute amendment that would have required counseling for exemption requests. Public testimony was overwhelmingly opposed, with physicians, pediatricians, cancer advocates, parents of immunocompromised children, and public health groups warning that the bill would lower vaccination rates and increase risk to vulnerable Floridians. The bill remained pending after testimony, with no final vote taken in the portion provided.