Transcript Highlights:

• Members, we're gonna call up pending business for votes on bills that we heard earlier.
• We go through all of these screeners and and all of this pretty cool technology, so I'm wondering from
• I urge you to vote no and on Senate Bill 1610.
• I'm asking you to vote no on Senate Bill 1610.
• Please vote no on Senate Bill 1610. I want my brother to have a chance to come home.

Transcript Highlights:

• HB 3867 by Zwiener relating to voting a statewide ballot or voting in a limited ballot following the
• HB 4022 by Lujan relating to the Texas Jobs, Energy and Technology Innovation Act refer the Committee
• HB 4030 by Morale show relating the document documentation of proof of identification for voting for
• With the political party to vote in a prior priorities primary election or creating criminal offense
• HB 4149 by Button relating to the Texas Jobs, Energies, Technology and Innovation Act referred to the

Transcript Highlights:

• happened and the vote was taken on this. happened and the vote was taken on this.
• voting for.
• for they've been voting what they voted for they've been voting what they voted for you<03:16:20.160
• opportunity to vote on this. opportunity to vote on this.
• <04:08:45.920> to incorporate enhanced technologies to incorporate enhanced technologies to

Keywords: 1189, house, all

Transcript Highlights:

• Section 19, the line of credit for the Child Welfare Technology Project.
• If not, I will have the clerk call the vote on the amendment. Mr.
• If not, I will have the clerk call the vote for a do not pass, so he do not want it to pass the vote.
• Have the clerk call the vote for a do not pass, so he do not want it to pass the vote.
• Seeing none, we'll have the clerk call the vote for a do pass on 1540.

Keywords: 908, all

Summary: The committee first took up House Bill 1012, the Department of Health and Human Services budget. Senator Dever walked through the amended budget, highlighting a roughly $5.85 billion all-funds total, major one-time items for IT, child care, housing, behavioral health, juvenile justice, rural EMS, and supportive housing, along with funding for Medicaid expansion, CCBHCs, opioid settlement uses, and several studies and reporting requirements. Members discussed the provider inflation increase, with Senator Mathern urging a 2%/2% rate instead of 2%/1.5%, but the committee adopted the subcommittee amendment and then passed the amended bill 15-0 with a do-pass recommendation. Senator Dever was named as carrier. The committee then considered House Bill 1540, a school choice/education savings account-style bill. Senator Shibley explained the subcommittee amendments, including clarifying the Bank of North Dakota as administrator, adding a means test at 400% of the federal poverty guideline, and adjusting the fiscal note to about $21.7 million for the second year. In debate, members raised concerns about the bank being assigned duties outside its normal role, the lack of DPI involvement, and whether the means test should be tiered rather than a hard cutoff. The committee rejected a do-not-pass motion 5-10-1, then approved a do-pass motion on the amended bill 9-6-1, with Senator Wobama noted as the likely carrier. The meeting ended with the chair announcing the committee would adjourn and reconvene the next morning.

Transcript Highlights:

• >> Chair<00:41:23.200> votes<00:41:23.520> yes. >> Chair votes yes.
• >> chair votes, yes. >> chair votes, yes. >> 120. >> 120.
• going to go ahead and vote OTP on this. going to go ahead and vote OTP on this.
• Uh, the clerk votes no. >> no. Uh, the clerk votes no.
• c><01:36:47.440> do to get you to vote or not vote or do to get you to vote or not vote or do

Keywords: 1189, house, all

Transcript Highlights:

• All members vote who desire to vote. All members vote who desire to vote.
• All members vote who desire to vote. All members vote who desire to vote.
• All those vote who desire to vote. All those vote who desire to vote.
• desire to vote all members vote who desire to vote all members vote who desire to vote.
• All those vote who desire to vote. All those vote who desire to vote. All those vote.

Keywords: 988, house, all

Transcript Highlights:

• sort of CTE program would you Technology sort of CTE program would you require<00:17:19.919> a
• officials and uh technology officials and uh technology directors<03:11:28.200> we<03:11:
• Why should we be purchasing things separately, not using the same technology?
• and I'm not oppositional technology and I'm not oppositional technology<04:22:21.800> I<04:22
• The people that created this technology have said so themselves.

Keywords: 928, house, all

Summary: The committee first heard House Bill 362, which would grant the Department of Education rulemaking authority related to educator licensure and testing requirements, including passing scores on professional education assessments. Representative Ladd said the bill is intended to preserve New Hampshire’s standards for classroom teachers and CTE instructors, while allowing DOE flexibility through rulemaking. He emphasized maintaining high standards, including for career and technical education, and said he was open to DOE clarifying the language further. Committee members raised concerns that the bill, as written, could remove language recognizing industry-recognized credentials for CTE instructors. Department of Education Director Steven Appy said DOE had drafted an amendment to clarify that the requirement applies to an initial New Hampshire license, to exempt CTE teachers from content exams, and to preserve current administrative practice allowing basic academic skills testing and industry-recognized credentials as substitutes. The committee discussed the distinction between basic academic skills tests and content assessments, and Appy said the amendment was meant to avoid conflating those requirements. The chair said the committee would take up executive session on HB 362 and related bills later. The committee then took up House Bill 90, which narrows and defines the rules for part-time teachers, especially in concurrent enrollment settings. Representative Ladd explained that the bill is meant to allow qualified college faculty or adjuncts from the University System or Community College System to teach high school concurrent-enrollment courses when local schools lack a teacher with the needed master’s-level credentials, particularly in math and STEM subjects. He said the bill is intended to expand student access to college-level coursework, save money, and preserve standards, while still requiring background checks and adherence to ethics and conduct rules. Members began asking questions about how the bill would work in practice, including certification and endorsement issues, but the hearing was not concluded in the portion provided.

Transcript Highlights:

• We will not be voting today.
• Thirty seconds: technology has taken us a long ways, and technology continues to expand.
• Thirty seconds: technology has taken us a long ways, and technology continues to expand.
• You know, sometimes some investments in technology, for example, if you want to have technology that
• The technology issue that the Senate Member of Peter Norris brought up—the biggest technology investment

Summary: The hearing focused on California wildfire resilience, with the first panel discussing statewide funding, policy, and strategic priorities, and the second panel shifting to home hardening and defensible space. The LAO outlined the state’s wildfire risk, the large increase in resilience spending in recent years, and the fact that most funding has been one-time rather than ongoing. Testimony emphasized that wildfire risk varies greatly by region, that the state must balance response spending with prevention, and that success should be measured more carefully than by acres treated alone. Witnesses also noted the importance of local, federal, utility, and Proposition 4 funding sources, as well as the need for long-term maintenance and strategic prioritization rather than scattered projects. Cal Fire leadership and other witnesses stressed that California’s wildfire problem is not uniform: forested areas, chaparral, and wildland-urban interface communities require different strategies. In Northern California and forested watersheds, speakers emphasized fuels reduction, prescribed and cultural burning, strategic fuel breaks, watershed protection, and maintaining forest health. In Southern California, testimony focused on wind-driven fires, ember intrusion, ignition prevention along roads and power lines, and the limits of large-scale vegetation clearing. Several witnesses argued that the state should invest where it can leverage local and regional partnerships, support capacity-building programs like Regional Forest and Fire Capacity, and improve data systems to track treatment effectiveness and project outcomes. Members repeatedly pressed witnesses on how to prioritize limited funds, asking what should be done more of, less of, and first. The chair argued that protecting homes and communities through hardening and defensible space should be a major priority, especially near structures, while also acknowledging the need for broader landscape work and watershed protection. There was discussion of incentives such as insurance discounts, property tax treatment, and community certification for hardened homes, along with the need for multiple payers rather than relying on the state alone. Cal Fire reported new and expanding data tools, including treatment trackers, defensible space inspection dashboards, and a fuels treatment effectiveness program that evaluates whether nearby treatments affected wildfire behavior. No votes were taken because the hearing was informational only.

Transcript Highlights:

• We will not be taking any votes today.
• So all of those technological questions, Is it transferring appropriately?
• projects are in terms of reporting to the Department of Technology.
• And so by talking with the Department of Technology about how we could align that information technology
• Hi, I'm Frank Holt, chairman, CEO of Synergem Technologies, a regional provider in the north.

Summary: Assembly Budget Subcommittee No. 6 heard the Governor’s May Revision proposals for the judicial branch, the Board of State and Community Corrections, the Department of Justice, and the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation. The Legislative Analyst’s Office opened with a warning that the state budget remains structurally imbalanced and urged the Legislature to avoid new ongoing spending unless offset by reductions elsewhere. In the judicial branch discussion, the Judicial Council highlighted language access funding, appellate court security, a backfill for the state court facilities construction fund, and an extension of the lactation room mandate; Finance supported most items but suggested reporting language on interpreter costs and reducing the General Fund backfill. Members raised concerns about judicial vacancies, long-term salary freezes, remote hearings, and the lack of progress on court staffing in some counties. For the Board of State and Community Corrections, the administration proposed $10 million one-time each for the Missing and Murdered Indigenous People grant program and a human trafficking vertical prosecution grant program. The LAO said both should be weighed against other priorities and suggested the Legislature consider whether the Tribal Nations Grant Fund could support MMIP work, while Finance said it preferred General Fund support and wanted more review before any fund swap. Members strongly supported MMIP funding and asked whether ongoing support would be considered. On the human trafficking grant, Finance said BSC was a good fit because of its grant administration experience and prior vertical prosecution work, while legislators asked why the program was not placed with the Office of Emergency Services as originally contemplated in prior legislation. The Department of Justice presented antitrust litigation funding, Medi-Cal Fraud and Elder Abuse staffing, completion of organized retail criminal enterprise cases, and trailer bill language for a continuous appropriation from the Victims of Consumer Fraud Restitution Fund. The LAO supported the antitrust account use but questioned the Unfair Competition Law Fund’s ability to cover the full request without General Fund repayment, and recommended against a continuous appropriation for the restitution fund in favor of a more limited mechanism with legislative oversight. Finance said the fund would remain solvent and defended the continuous appropriation as necessary to pay victims promptly. In the CDCR portion, the largest discussion centered on the Boston Consulting Group efficiency review and sharply reduced savings estimates; LAO said the department had not fully explained the proposed position eliminations or future $100 million savings target, while Finance said the work reflected deeper analysis and ongoing efforts to find savings. Members repeatedly pressed CDCR and Finance on the gap between earlier promised savings and the revised figures. CDCR also outlined population projections showing continued declines in prison and parole populations, while LAO again urged the state to close an additional prison to save ongoing costs. The department then walked through several May Revision items, including workers’ compensation funding, a Corcoran honor housing dorm, incarcerated firefighter pay implementation, an incarcerated menopause program, mental health receiver staffing, mental health resource teams and crisis intervention teams, medical classification staffing changes, and AI note-taking for the electronic health record. LAO generally recommended limiting-term funding and more reporting for many of these proposals, while Finance defended them as necessary ongoing investments or court-ordered obligations. Members questioned the cost of workers’ compensation, the need for more prison closures, the lack of funding for women’s facility violence prevention, and the timing and transparency of the BCG savings process. No votes were taken.

Transcript Highlights:

• I will be<00:12:52.000> voting<00:12:52.360> yes. be voting yes. be voting yes.
• Got it. >> Those voting yes, 17. Those voting no, 13.
• <00:55:08.240> on voted on, there is no further vote on voted on, there is no further vote
• Those voting yes, 26. Those voting no, 4.
• Those voting yes, 17. Those voting no, 13.

Keywords: 927, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• And this helps with buying technology and other things that can help.
• So is that $14 million just simple surveillance-type technology?
• So you're saying that this technology has the ability to, like, to be able to...
• Awesome technology if it's being used by the good guys, I guess, right?
• And incredibly scary technology if it gets in the wrong hands.

Keywords: 959, house, all

Transcript Highlights:

• We appreciate that, and we will be voting at the conclusion of all the testimony.
• separated out, and we will vote individually on anyone you would like to vote on separately.
• may tune back into us at 3:30, or about 3:15, to make sure that you are voted in.
• Is there Would like to remove one of those names and vote separately.
• Is there anyone you would like to vote separately on?

Summary: The Appropriations Committee on Higher Education met to consider a large slate of confirmations and reappointments to boards of trustees for Florida’s colleges, universities, and the Florida Prepaid College Board. Chair Harrell opened by emphasizing the importance of trustee appointments to maintaining Florida’s higher education system, and the committee heard brief testimony from each nominee about their background, ties to the institution, and priorities such as student success, workforce alignment, fiscal stewardship, and community partnerships. Several nominees highlighted personal connections to their schools, including alumni status, family legacy, or prior service on the board, while others emphasized experience in business, law, education, health care, or public service. Testimony focused heavily on workforce development and institutional growth. Speakers cited nursing, dual enrollment, applied programs, military and veteran support, broadband access, agriculture, law enforcement, and technical training as key areas for colleges to meet regional labor needs. University nominees discussed research expansion, affordability, strategic planning, and partnerships with industry and government, with Florida Atlantic, Florida Polytechnic, the University of West Florida, and the University of South Florida each described as being in periods of growth or transition. Miami-Dade College, Tallahassee State College, Polk State College, and other state colleges were praised for enrollment, economic impact, and job placement outcomes. The committee also heard from the Florida Prepaid College Board reappointee, who described the program as a long-term promise backed by public trust and reported recent technology and customer-service improvements. After testimony, the committee took up the nominations as a group. One nominee, Drew Weatherford, had withdrawn and was not voted on. The remaining trustees were approved unanimously by roll call and reported favorably to the Ethics and Elections Committee. The meeting then adjourned.

Transcript Highlights:

• I know there's a lot going on. request to go back and forth on committees, both to vote and as well as
• This work has led to a complex that has become the premier site for research, technology, education,
• or critical infrastructure technology, the board. restructuring of the board is really the main part
• University, Mervap Musa, CEO at Rees Technology Center, are here to provide testimony. regarding how
• And all of these, we're going to set up test beds at Reese Technology Center and EMEFAC. on critical

Bills: HB 1105, HB1527, HB1787, HB1972, HB2081, HB3296, HB3976, HB4071, HB4234, HB4438, HB4701, HB5092, HB5150, HB5180, HB5265, HB5333, HJR203

Keywords: tuition exemption, paramedics, higher education, laboratory fees, emergency medical services, peace officers, criminal justice, law enforcement, degree programs, public institutions, HB 1787, HPV, human papillomavirus, college health, university health, student health, public health education, prevention program, screening, early detection

Transcript Highlights:

• If not, Vice Chair for the vote. Chair votes I. >> Voting on SB 3055.
• If not, Vice Chair for the vote. Chair votes I. >> Voting on SB 3055.
• Vice Chair for the vote. Chair votes I. >> Members voting on 2761.
• Vice Chair for the vote. Chair votes I. >> Members voting on 2761.
• Vice Chair for the vote. Chair votes I. >> Members voting on 2761.

Keywords: 912, senate, all

Summary: The Committee on Labor and Technology heard testimony on several measures. SB 2198 would direct DLIR to study a Hawaii Workforce Excellence Award program and report back to the Legislature; DLIR supported it so long as it did not affect its supplemental budget request. SB 2140 would authorize counties to require contractors to disclose wage, benefit, hour, and employment-status information and to deny or suspend permits for certain labor-law violations; DLIR and labor representatives supported it as an added accountability tool, while the committee discussed whether state law alone was sufficient and whether counties would still need to pass their own ordinances. SB 3055 would prohibit falsely impersonating a union representative; union and labor groups strongly supported it, and UPW said it was open to amendments to address concerns raised by OPA. SB 3090, SB 3091, and SB 3092 were emergency appropriation bills for public employment cost items tied to collective bargaining and temporary hazard pay or salary adjustments for various bargaining units; agencies and unions generally supported moving them forward, and B&F said the amounts were still being finalized because negotiations were ongoing. The committee also heard SB 2761, which would bar social media platforms from allowing users under 16 to create or maintain accounts if the platform knows the user is under 16. DCCA’s Office of Consumer Protection offered comments, while CCIA and Meta opposed the bill, raising constitutional and First Amendment concerns and arguing that blanket bans could push teens to less regulated spaces online. Meta also said the bill’s carveouts were too narrow and would leave major platforms outside the scope of the restriction. In decision-making, the committee recommended passage of SB 2198 with amendments, SB 2140 as is, SB 3055 with amendments adding a specific intent-to-deceive standard, SB 3090 with amendments, SB 3091 with amendments, SB 3092 with amendments, and SB 2761 with amendments adopting DCCA’s changes and noting potential First Amendment issues in the committee report. For the appropriation bills, the committee changed the effective date to January 1, 2077 as a placeholder. All recommendations were adopted, with reservations noted on SB 2761 from Senators Moriwaki, Fevella, and Ihara.

Transcript Highlights:

• So vote no on this rule. Vote no on this blank check.
• and for technology. and for technology.
• five-minute votes. five-minute votes.
• for voting against it. for voting against it.
• Democrats voted for it, Republicans voted for it, and independents voted for it.

Keywords: U.S. House of Representatives Floor Proceedings on Thursday, June 4, 2026, 1012, house, all

Transcript Highlights:

• You'll vote with me. That is a bill, ma'am. He almost made it. He almost made it through.
• And members, by your vote, the bill is reported favorably.
• Members, that was a unanimous vote. I'm really excited right now.
• By your vote, the bill is favorably reported. And Madam Chair, I've had fun.
• Mike Grissom, Life Lift Technology. Waves in support. Mike Grissom, Life Lift Technology.

Summary: The committee met with a quorum and heard a lengthy agenda of bills, with the chair limiting public testimony to about one minute per speaker. Early action included passage of HB 203, which allows certain counties to opt back into transportation concurrency, as amended to narrow the bill to small counties. The committee also favorably reported CS/HB 43, allowing renters to reuse tenant screening reports for 30 days, and HB 897, a timeshare-related strike-all that clarified timeshare governance provisions and annual board meeting requirements. The committee then approved HJR 1,215, proposing a constitutional amendment to eliminate tangible personal property tax for farmers and agricultural businesses, with support from agriculture and business groups. A major portion of the meeting focused on the committee’s hemp package. Members discussed the committee bill PCB for HAT-25-01, which would create a regulatory framework for hemp-derived intoxicating products, including licensing, packaging and labeling restrictions, testing, and sales limitations. Testimony was mixed: industry representatives and distributors generally supported regulation but urged changes on branding, packaging, milligram limits, and sales locations; convenience store and petroleum marketers opposed restrictions that would exclude gas stations; and consumer-safety and addiction advocates supported tighter controls, including bans on synthetics, online sales, and child-appealing packaging. The committee also heard and approved PCB for HAT-25-02, a companion tax bill imposing excise taxes on hemp consumables and beverages, despite concerns raised about possible triple taxation and higher compliance costs. The committee next passed HB 211, expanding the definition of farm products to include edible and non-edible plants and clarifying agricultural preemption on bona fide farm operations. It also favorably reported PCS for HB 561, creating a chief manufacturing officer role within the Department of Commerce, a workforce development grant program, a voluntary manufacturing promotion campaign, and required reporting, along with PCS for HB 563, which adds an annual fee of up to $100 for participants in the promotional campaign. Both manufacturing bills drew broad support from industry and economic development groups. Finally, the committee took up HJR 1257 and its conforming bill HB 1259, which would create property tax benefits for long-term rental properties owned by Floridians with a separate homestead. Supporters argued the measure would encourage long-term rentals and investment in Florida, while opponents from counties and cities warned it would shift tax burdens and reduce local revenue. After debate, the joint resolution passed 9-4 and the implementing bill also passed 9-4, and the meeting adjourned after all agenda items were completed.

Transcript Highlights:

• Remember, and we can play this game, the vote we had was we were trying to have the vote before lunch
• We voted on it after lunch, Mr. Chair. I'll tell you what. We tried to vote before, correct?
• And it's brought to the committee for a vote.
• And so for those who don't have a vote, don't like it or whatever, there's always a prerogative to vote
• **Senator Block**: Did we try to vote on it before lunch? We did, right?

Transcript Highlights:

• . >> Chair: SB 360 IS REPORTED FAVORABLY BY YOUR VOTE.
• THE ADMINISTRATOR OF THE TELECOMMUNICATIONS ACCESS SYSTEM TO DISTRIBUTE MORE MODERN AND UPDATED TECHNOLOGIES
• INCORPORATING DEFINITIONS FOR TECHNOLOGY NOT CONTEMPLATED BY THE ORIGINAL ACT AND REVISING OUTDATED
• BY YOUR VOTE CS FOR SB 344 IS REPORTED FAVORABLY.
• SENATOR FINE. >> SENATOR GRUTERS. >> SENATOR INGOGLIA. >> SENATOR PIZZO. >> CHAIR BRADLEY. >> BUY YOUR VOTE

Keywords: 999, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• We're going to keep that vote on call. It's two votes yes and three votes no. Thank you so much.
• to vote or party issues?
• Not voting. Tungipa, not voting.
• and the ability to vote.
• Respectfully ask for an I vote. “Respectfully, ask for an aye vote.” “So moved.”

Summary: The committee heard a long agenda of elections-related bills. It first approved three consent items: AB 808, AB 1029, and AB 1072. The committee then took up AB 1249, which would require non-Voter’s Choice Act counties to offer at least one Saturday early-voting location before statewide elections and allow in-person return of vote-by-mail ballots at designated county offices or satellite locations. Supporters said it would expand access for working voters and those with transportation barriers; some members raised concerns about ballot verification and added workload for rural counties. The bill passed the committee on a divided vote and was placed on call for absent members. The committee next considered AB 25, a voter ID and election integrity measure that would require citizenship verification, government ID for voting, tighter voter-roll audits, and a 72-hour ballot-counting deadline. The author and supporters argued it would restore public trust and improve election integrity, while opponents from the League of Women Voters, ACLU California Action, labor groups, disability advocates, and others said it would restrict access, burden vulnerable voters, and amount to voter suppression. After extensive debate, the committee voted the bill out on a narrow split and kept it on call. Members also approved AB 1164, which clarifies when voters are entitled to a replacement ballot and updates the Voter Bill of Rights language; AB 1441, which would create an independent citizens redistricting commission in Merced County despite opposition from the county board over cost and local control; and AB 16, which would clarify county election officials’ authority to begin processing vote-by-mail ballots earlier and clean up outdated code. The committee also heard AB 1411, which would require non-VCA counties to prepare voter education and outreach plans and use a Secretary of State template, with the sponsor saying it would improve voter information statewide.

Transcript Highlights:

• Let's vote on let's move consent.
• <01:07:50.559> the and with the emerging technologies the and with the emerging technologies
• So, I'm voting no. All that on consent. So, I'm voting no.
• That was just You just voted on 247. That was just You just voted on that<01:19:47.440> one.
• So, let's vote on the amendment Okay.

Keywords: 1191, senate, all